This blog is about
Maddie McCann, but as I’ve had the opportunity to say, does NOT exist because of the unfortunate demise of said British 4-year child.
It was, and is, an
anonymous exercise of citizenship, to show that one doesn’t have to be a politician to exercise politics, as politics starts right at the spot where your feet are standing at any given point of time.
Politics is nothing else than the exercise by citizens of their citizenship, usually delegated upon those who they elect, amongst
THEMSELVES.
Politicians are as much people, as people are politicians. That simple, and don't ever let that power be taken away from you.
We’ve also shown, post after post, that what is known as the
Maddie McCann Affair is much, much more than about the set of events of a death that occurred in
PdL.
Recent events have proved us right.
Yes, it was in that particular quaint little fishing town that, just like a novel, all the events related with
Maddie McCann, did spark.
But as we’ve been explaining, what
followed, very quickly took such proportions that made that place nothing more than a speck of dust when seen where all has happened since.
And what followed
Maddie’s death is what is
REALLY RELEVANT, as that was what was of
criminal nature and not the child’s loss of life, which we continue to believe to have happened in an accidental manner.
But, if
PdL is indeed but a speck of dust,
Portugal itself, its
government, police and
justice system were not much bigger than a grain of sand, just so you understand how big the conflict of interests really was, and certainly continues to be.
Ironside was the first to use the expression
“White Hats”, that, together with its corollary,
”Black Hats”, became a household expressions in this blog. And now are commonly used in the internet.
I found this analogy with the good old cowboys movies, to be one very fortunate choice of words, as both defined with much more accuracy the two main “camps” around the
Maddie McCann Affair, than the
“Pro” and
“Anti” with which we were presented by the
Black Hats.
They had two intentions with this.
The first was to link the
negativity that the word
“Anti” contains with those seeking to know the truth, while attaching themselves to the
positive word
“Pro”. Much like what is achieved with
“White Hats” vs ”Black Hats”, only the other way around, which we, obviously, do find it to be the correct order of things.
The second was that, by dividing us all into either being
“Pro-McCann” or
“Anti-McCann” they were limiting our
opinion scope to just the
McCann couple, which was very convenient as it left out the majority of the
Black Hats.
Pretty clever, but then again, we’ve always said that we were up against very clever people.
We’ve been saying, for quite a while now, that the
Black Hat Castle of Cards, has been steadily crumbling down. And like any erosion, is going at an exponentially fast rate, as we’re witnessing.
Those who were once
allies, have now become
foes, and
foes are known to fight between themselves.
And in the process for an
ally to become a
foe, it's
mandatory for betrayal, or its perception, to be found somewhere in the middle, and how bitter one becomes when one feels betrayed.
We, in this blog have said that the crumbling began with “political demise” of
Jim Gamble, but now, when doing some researching for this post, I came across with a somewhat violent articles by
The Sun against
Gordon Brown, in
November 2009.
Getting a name wrong and not bowing in respect of the fallen in combat is unquestionably reprehensible, but I think it doesn’t merit the thrashing the man got on
November 9th, 2009 (1)(2)(3).
For example, I found very much more offensive the fact that
Jim Gamble, Gerry and
Kate McCann wore in public a
poppy on their lapels. That really insulted the memory of all valiant soldiers who’ve offered the
UK their life as the ultimate sacrifice.
So, something must have happened around that time.
Mr. Brown either stepped on someone’s toes or, knowing him as we know, demanded to have more power than he was “entitled” to.
I don’t know what he did, but he certainly had
The Sun after him like a rabid dog during and after last year’s elections
(1)(2)(3).
But that is “way-above-our-pay-grade-level-of-politics”, so we’ll stick with
Jim Gamble being kicked off
CEOP as the catalyst for the beginning of hostilities between the
Black Hats.
Hopefully, history books will correct us on this, but now that is an unimportant detail. What is important is that they’re after each other’s throats, viciously.
So hostilities have now escalated, as we predicted, into a full scale war.
The
Black Hats are now fighting each other; each belligerent using all its power and might.
The outcome is unknown, but this blog prides itself in contributing that it is indeed taking place.
First, we had the
“NOTW 168th Air Squadron” being annihilated right in their HQ. It was wiped completely off the tarmac, unable to get a single plane up in the air. All destroyed on the ground. So humiliating.
We’ll back to this later, as it is quite telling about what is going on.
Then we had the
“SY Batallions” being torn to shreds in the
battlefields of the British Parliament.
The very same battlefields that wait bigger and tougher fights very soon.
But the decisive factor that will be remembered in this war was the engaging of the
“Brown Division”.
Gordon Brown did try to tell us something on
January 24th, 2011, about his phone being hacked, and, in fact, more than a year before, on
Dec 11th 2009, the
The Sun had already shown an unusual interest in the use he had of his cellphone.
With the
“Brown Division” fully engaged there was no more turning back.
It forced the
“Murdoch Corps” to deploy into the battlefield, which is due to arrive soon in full power.
Rebekah Brooks' troops have done their best to contain damages, but have caved in. and whatever is to happen, will happen, we only know that it will be
barbaric and
cannibalistic.
And the events are happening at a rate quite hard to keep up pace with.
A huge amount of blood is expected to be spilled, as this huge fighting machine will not go down easy, if it will go down at all, although
Rebekah Brooks's resignation appears to show that not all is well on
Murdoch's "Eastern Front".
On his
"Western Front", it seems that the
FBI is now investigating possible hacking on
9/11 relatives of victims. A subject to which all Americans are very sensitive about, so, if this proves to be true, that will mean that the
US will be engaged in this war, and we all know what happened when
America arrived in all wars in which the
UK was already fighting…
They came, they saw and they won.
But let’s return to the ongoing fighting. First, back to the destroying of the
“NOTW 168th Air Squadron” and then to the engagement of the
“Brown Division”.
And just as a side note, while we’re on the subject of
“Divisions”, isn’t it deafening the silence from the
“Blair Division”? It’s like it’s exercising fully its
Miranda Rights, even before anybody has even read them to them…
The loss of
NOTW, is, in the least, scandalous.
Why close a paper because it was caught up in some illegality?
After all, it wouldn’t be the first, would it? And all others before closed down?
Shouldn’t just the responsible ones be the only ones accountable for whatever possible illegality, and allow the paper business to go on as normal, as expected?
Why close it?
Shouldn’t the eventual dropping sales be the determining factor for such a decision, and not one based on possible criminal behavior of just a FEW of its professionals?
So many questions, a very simple answer, or at least, a simple word to answer them all:
CARELESSNESS.
Only utter
CARELESSNESS in handling sensitive information can justify such a hasty decision.
This suddenness in closure means only that the whole lot of
professionals, archives and
computers had to be
silenced, and silenced at once.
Why? Because they were
CARELESS with the information, and it could be easily accessible by inadequate probing eyes if any action wasn’t taken.
It was preferable to take such obvious action as the deletion of files, which basically assumes guilt, than to have what was deleted be seen. Now, we know that to delete an electronic footprint is not exactly the easiest thing to do…
This
CARELESSNESS was probably due to the fact that they felt that they had their backs completely protected, and became
ARROGANT. Arrogance only leads down one path, that of error.
So, the
NOTW had to go, and it wasn’t enemy fire that wiped off
168 years of tabloid, just like that.
Those who made that decision know very well why they made it, and how urgent and needed it was that it was made.
Enough of the
NOTW demise.
Because it isn’t important, what is important is that people understood that
British journalists published stories in accordance with the needs and requirements of friends and clients, regardless of being real or not.
Doesn’t the
McCann name just pop right up?
The engagement of
“Brown Division”, brings in one very important
Black Hat asset,
The Sun.
The Sun has been clearly nominated to stand up to the
“Brown Division”. The hatred between both is evident, and the tabloid has done a very poor job standing its ground.
I found its defensive tactics quite interesting. As per all
Black Hat tactics, it reveals
CARELESSNESS and
ARROGANCE.
After years of living in a self-created fictionalized world, they decide to react in defense by running a ridiculous story about a
parent, who out of the goodness of his heart decided to contact the tabloid to help fight a disease.
How noble, how endearing, but being such a good man, why does he need to be protected from
Brown? So that his altruism would go unrecognized by his peers? It can only be that, because any other sort of fear can only result from being afraid of having to be accountable for his words, but that would only worry him if he was
lying, and we know he isn’t because he did, so says the tabloid, sign an
affidavit.
It’s a known fact that hard times create bonds between sufferers.
Parents of seriously ill children tend to come together and help each other to surpass such difficult times, if only to gather and join up each one’s fading strengths so that together they become a whole strong unity able to fight, together, such adversity.
There’s no back stabbing, only burden-sharing.
If I had a child with a serious disease, and did happen to find out that on nearby bed lay a son or daughter of a celebrity, my natural reaction would be to start to look at that person with much more humanity, and join him/her in all his efforts in the fight against the disease that had stricken both our children.
Not go, behind his back, and tell a tabloid.
But that’s me.
And I‘m not saying that
The Sun didn’t have the
Brown’s approval to run the story, nor that it did, as I have no idea and am not interested in having one. I’m just saying that the story that the tabloid has run to justify itself is utter tripe.
So much so, that it lasted less than half a day on the internet.
In fact, what we were confronted with, once again, was with yet another
“Maddie-Sighting-Witness”, so common in
The Sun, only this time the witness didn’t see a
lookalike Maddie in some corner of the world, but saw himself heading for
The Sun, in the most benign and altruist manner as we saw.
SKY News, as expected, also ran the story, no surprises there, but to watch that news channel these days is quite painful.
One can sense the total discomfort in every word said, be about what subject it may be, because nobody is listening, just watching. Some, like myself, with a smile on their face.
But let us just lose one minute to look at what this parent had to say:
“The father, who contacted us in November 2006, was stunned when he heard the allegations that The Sun must have accessed Fraser's medical files to discover his condition.
And yesterday he signed a legal affidavit confirming he was the source of our story, published when Mr Brown was Chancellor.
He said: "It was difficult knowing the truth, then to hear the lies being put out just to screw the papers.
"This has taken the focus off the issue and it has now put the focus on blaming people for something they didn't do.“
Now, of the two last paragraphs, I’ll just change TWO WORDS for just another TWO WORDS: “the papers” with “Mr. Amaral”. Just see the effect:
“He said: "It was difficult knowing the truth, then to hear the lies being put out just to screw Mr. Amaral.
"This has taken the focus off the issue and it has now put the focus on blaming people for something they didn't do.“
Fascinating, isn’t it? The Sun whining about what The Sun loves to do onto others. It’s like they have this unique template out of which they write their whole newstories.
But what has all this got to do with the McCanns?
The McCann Story was an ARROGANT and CARELESS story ran in the best classical “NI-Style”.
That style being: “we can say whatever we wish, they way we wish to do so and couldn’t give a rat’s ass about your intelligence, so do swallow whole the tripe we dish out to you while we rub it in your face that we can do what we can do, and you just have to put up with it with no complaints whatsoever otherwise we’ll sue your arse right off your pants, are we clear?”
The exact same ARROGANT and CARELESS style that made them close NOTW in a jiffy.
The exact same ARROGANT and CARELESS style that has now made the gigantic “Murdoch Corps” have to fight for its life.
I’ve had the opportunity to remark that although the rats are the first to abandon ship, but to be able to do that, a rope to DRY land is required.
The absence of a rope, or the existence of one that just drops into the middle of the ocean only has one consequence: the rats must stay and fight.
So a rope must then be found, and this is where the McCanns could come in and save save the day.
They’re the ideal sacrificial lambs at this point in time, and they know that, and that’s why they’re so, so silent and quiet. No longer rats, just insignificant white mice in an obscure laboratory.
But are they any good as rope?
On one hand, yes, as the popular wrath would be sufficient to distract the public, although this will only be valid if the US doesn’t pick up on this, if there’s something to be picked up on that side of the Atlantic.
But on anther hand, they’re certainly not. Why? Because of the Fund.
The Fund, unlike lying to the authorities, which is a crime, and unlike any possible sexual scandal which is not a crime at all; it is a SERIOUS crime.
Much, much more SERIOUS than any phone hacking scandal.
What was supposedly a brilliant move to pin down the McCanns and make sure that they had much, much to lose if they one day decided to change their minds about "the truth", has now become a SERIOUS problem to all.
So, apparently, the Black Hats cannot afford to change one scandal for a much bigger one.
As I said, there’s a war going on. I don’t know what the result will be, nor will even venture a prediction.
Only about the McCanns.
If the McCanns are brought to justice by the other hands than those of the Black Hats, then they will not only NOT represent any kind of rope, but become one BIG bucketful of nails for so many coffins out there…
On the other hand, the Black Hats are done with them, and really want to tar and feather them up.
Their situation looks really bad. I’m not seeing the deal that the book was to be an endless source of income, to still be in place. I'm sure it is NOT. And the book didn't really sell that much. Only two months have gone, and it's as if it it didn't exist.
After all, dimwit Kate McCann did decide to bite the hand that was feeding her, didn’t she?
Also, I’m not seeing ANY of the tabloids of running another McCann story EVER again. Too risky. With the exception of their arrest, that is. And about that, can I make a suggestion for The Sun headline that day? How about “McScams”? Do use it please, no copyrights demanded.
Their faces are well too known for them to resort to anonymity, and they don’t have the required “friendships” to live a life of a non-working celebrity.
I would say that they’re between a rock and hard place. They chose on May 3rd, 2007, to have to make that choice today. Now, all they have to do is tell all they know. They’ve asked for it, haven’t they?
And what about us?
Well, we’ll continue to force our hand. Even if the McCanns are brought to justice, it will remain this blog’s responsibility to ensure that there’s no mockery about it.
There are still many things to write. I have to explain to you how you can reopen the process, how Kate McCann’s book is proof that she, or whoever wrote the damn thing, reads this blog, revisit our friend Mr. Smith, and explain what the Gaspar’s statements are all about.
May I is finding some interesting biological and business linkages that help understand this whole drama, and Sina J is busy finding so many missing people that were “plucked” from it, and we still have our ongoing Quiz Night, don’t we?
Also “Up for tennis, Doc?” has had only one chapter, with already other two laying dormant for over a year. Then, we’ll start to join dots, and you fill the colours in.
Lastly, as expected, with the smell of victory I see some people already stepping up on their toes, dusting off and trying out their Sunday suits, swelling up their chests already rehearsing for the upcoming medal ceremony.
Please do not invite us for such an event. We wouldn’t miss our late afternoon tea, with scones, watching our grandchildren playing cricket for anything in this world.
