Wednesday 29 May 2019

Blood and the EVR dog - Part 1



1. Introduction

The Maddie case, in terms of internet, has been rocked by very well-known personalities, Mr Thompson and Sade Anslow, casting doubt over Eddie’s alerts on the Scenic: they only represented alerts to blood.

Later he would say that he wasn’t being adamant, that it could only have been blood not that it was only blood.

However, to say that his opinion was that Maddie’s body was never in the car, sets clearly aside the ‘could’, as it’s his conviction that she was never there:

https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturnz/status/1127320339539746816
 ⚡Bugsy ⚡‏ @TheBunnyReturnz
Replying to @regretkay @MancunianMEDlC and 34 others
Personally I don't think Madeleine was ever in the hire car. There's certainly no proof of it...or wasn't when the PJ shelved their case in 2008.
2:11 PM - 11 May 2019

https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturnz/status/1127323773118627840
⚡Bugsy ⚡‏ @TheBunnyReturnz
Replying to @maxine68711804 @regretkay and 34 others
Of course. We can form opinions based upon behaviour, but for me personally I won't subscribe to the theory that Madeleine's body was in the boot because there's no publicly available proof to support that theory.
10:25 pm - 11 May 2019

According to Mr Thompson, there is no ironclad proof that Madeleine’s body was EVER in the Scenic. We call to the attention of the readers that Mr Thompson is a self-proclaimed expert on EVRD dogs, human decomposition and blood. He understands blood, he understands dogs.

In that he accepts to only come second to his don, NotTextusa, the scientist with a degree which we don’t know in what but if we were to guess, we would say it was in drivel and twaddle, the only product he has consistently put out – of very high-quality, it must be recognised – in all the different characters he has been, and they have been so many over the years. Recent events have proved how right we have always been.

And on what does Mr Thompson base his conclusion. From this statement by Martin Grime that is in the PJ Files:

“It is my view that it is possible that the EVRD is alerting to 'cadaver scent' contaminant or human blood scent. No evidential or intelligence reliability can be made from this alert unless it can be confirmed with corroborating evidence.”

“Or human blood scent”, he is very clear, isn’t he? Or maybe he isn’t and that is what we intend to analyse.

This post is the first part of two. In this one we will analyse blood dog and blood in the context that is relevant and that is in the use in tandem of blood and EVRD dogs in sites where a human death is possible, probable or likely to have happened.

We intend to be bold with these 2 posts as at the end of them, show very clearly that Eddie did not alert to blood, decomposed or otherwise and we also intend to show what we believe Mr Grime meant when he said what he said.

As a disclaimer, we unlike some – NotTextusa, Mr Thompson and Sade Anslow, hoping to have respected the gang’s hierarchy – who claim to have unquestioned and above all unquestionable expertise on all of Martin Grime’s areas of expertise , are only providing personal opinions on the subject, based simply on logic and general culture and will evidently be corrected if shown we are wrong by those who sincerely want to help.

One does not have to possess a degree in science or have no more than the basics of physics to know the seriousness of a man standing in front of train to stop it, will end up with the train winning with terrible personal disastrous consequences for the man.

As we believe that Martin Grime is indeed an expert, we have only made an effort to make logical sense of what he said. No twisting, tweaking or adapting.


2. The simpleton school of EVRD dogs and blood

First let’s define who we consider to be a simpleton in the context of this post: that group of people who all have in common an alma mater. They have all graduated from the NotTextusa’s university of drivel.

According to these simpletons, the EVRD dog detects both blood and cadaver scent.

Then, this would be how the dogs work: the EVRD dog walks in, alerts. The alert can be blood or cadaver, at this stage no one knows.

The blood dog is brought in. If the blood dog signals, then it is blood but then one would remain in the situation of not knowing if that blood belonged to a cadaver or if it originated from a simple cut from a domestic accident or a nosebleed. At this stage no one knows whether the EVRD dog alerts are of cadaver or blood as the blood dog does not help in any way clarify that.

The only added value for the blood dog alert to be working in tandem with the EVRD, is that we get to know that there is blood present. That’s it, nothing else.

According to this theory, one still doesn’t get to know if a cadaver was present. And because both dogs alert to blood, what the blood dog alert does in fact is to rule out completely the possibility of us EVER knowing that, as the possibility of being only blood will always be present.

Only if the blood dog doesn’t give any alert, can one be certain that it is cadaver scent but… whose cadaver?

Because science is yet not able to physically retrieve any sample from the cadaver compound residue that the body leaves behind, it can’t extract from it any DNA, then we are left with the uncertainty of who the dead person is.

According to the simpletons, the dogs, alone or together are useless in any scenario.


3. According to simpletons, an always live Maddie

But, will reply the simpleton, that is not so because if BOTH the EVRD and the blood dogs do alert, meaning the possibility of a dead person AND blood present, then it is possible to extract DNA from the blood and determine who the dead person in question is.

No, because where there’s blood, then according to you there’s the strong possibility of it only being blood, as the EVRD dog could be only alerting to that substance. Following their logic, whenever blood is alerted, the possibility of referring to a cadaver must be ruled out, and that’s why Mr Thompson so firmly believes that Maddie’s body was never in the Scenic.

And that’s the reason why the simpletons, undercover pros while waving for all to see and notice the anti colours, want so much for the EVRD to detect both blood and cadaver: it explains the alert in the Scenic and it reduces the dog alerts into saying absolutely nothing about whether Maddie is dead, regardless of whatever DNA results obtained, by Mark Perlin or anyone else for that matter.

This is how relevant this question is. That’s why they cling to Martin Grime’s “or human blood scent” for dear life.

Fortunately for us, these “antis” have over-played their hand and revealed their game.

Let’s imagine that in the Maddie case that Maddie’s DNA was found both in the apartment and in the Scenic. Full, unquestionable 100% matches.

Would that prove, according to the simpleton theory of dogs, that a dead Maddie had been there? Absolutely not.

As said above, according to them, the EVRD “cadaver” alert is to be immediately disregarded as blood was confirmed, so Eddie’s alerts could be just that and there’s no way to eliminate that uncertainty.

And because it can “only” be blood, one has then to take into account the possibility that Maddie struggled when being taken by the abductor and sprayed her blood everywhere in the apartment.

Blood and cadaver alerts in the living-room, fully explained. Let’s continue to accompany the simpleton’s explanation for all.

The scent of cadaver in the bedroom? Well, that could have been from anyone, not necessarily Maddie, as there was no DNA collected there to prove it is her. In fact, if she struggled in the living room, then it would be absurd to think the cadaver scent in the bedroom could be hers. A preposterous thought, even! It has to be from someone else.

Same goes with the flowerbed, cuddle cat and the clothing.

Plus, according to the simpletons, the scent in the flowerbed could have come from a phenomenon similar to someone smoking a cigarette outside as a dead body just happened to pass nearby… Walking Dead not fiction after all?

To those not familiar with Mr Thompson’s cigarette theory, here it is:


Textusa 27 Jan 2019, 18:38:00
Mr Thompson,
Can you please give a brief explanation as to how the airborne scent remained outside for months to be there and be detected by the dog in the flowerbed.

Pseudo Nym 27 Jan 2019, 18:51:00 
Can you explain how your non retrievable residue did?
Scents attach themselves to all manner of things Mr textusa. If I were to sit in a smoky room then go outdoors you would smell it on my clothes right? Martin Grime wasn't certain of this alert anyway. But you should know this. Again, this could be explained by scent pooling, and to understand that, I would urge you to read the book I referred you to above.

And NotTextusa has presented the possibility for the alert in the flowerbed to have been because of a medieval graveyard.

To those not familiar with NotTextusa’s medieval graveyard theory, here it is:


To this very direct and specific question from us: “If only gas and only airborne contamination why was the scent detected in the backyard? It’s open air, impossible for airborne molecules to remain floating there.”

NotTextusa, the scientist replied in his blog:

“Well, why do you think? Might interest you to know that it’s impossible to field walk in this country without finding small pieces of human bone, due to centuries of ploughing disturbing medieval graves. Consequently, it finds its way into the topsoil very readily. Try thinking outside the box for a change.”

In response to this reply, we said: “All is scientifically explained, so says Insane”, to which NotTextusa, the scientist then said “Which it is [scientifically explained].

If the scent of the graveyard or similar to cigarette smoked cadaver scent wafted into the flowerbed then the same scent could have could have just wafted into the bedroom.

The clothes? Kate McCann just happened to have been near so many corpses, wasn’t that so?

In the Scenic, as blood was found, the cadaver possibility ruled out, all will be explained by contamination of blood by Maddie via her clothing or objects she used after having grazed a knee, nosebleed or some other injury no one noticed before she went missing.

Basically, with alerts from both dogs, it could, according to them, mean only be blood, and even if there is a 100% DNA match, it could have come from a live Maddie.

The EVRD alerts only, as they could mean literally anyone who has passed away and not necessarily Maddie, the possibility of her being alive has to be considered.

Maddie is, say the simpletons, alive. At least, they say, it’s a strong possibility and once one accepts the EVRD dog also alerts to blood, nothing in the files contradicts it.

See how important the EVRD dog v blood question is?



4. Mr Thompson’s farm analogy

So, according to the simpletons, what are the EVRD dogs good for? Absolutely nothing.

We challenge anyone to come up with a scenario within the simpleton theory of dogs, in which the EVRD dog is of any use other than exempting the parents and to cast doubt on the possibility of death ever having happened in the apartment.

We will be waiting for one. A single one.

Mr Thompson on May 15 explains all his reasoning by using the following analogy:

“Understanding how the dogs worked is as simple as adding beans. In fact, to test how easy it was, I tried a little experiment.

My friend's little boy - who is eight, has a little toy farm set. I substituted Eddie and Keela for a horse and a cow.

I then told him the horse was really good at smelling when cake was being baked, and when cookies were being made.

I told him the cow could only smell cookies.

He didn't get it the first time - he was only eight after all, but, after a couple more goes, he understood.

It really is *that* simple. And yet, a small adult who pretends to be of higher intelligence than any other being on the planet, and has had 12 years to get it, STILL can't work out how the dogs work.

Needless to say, myself and my mate's young lad ate the cookies the horse and cow found and I tried not to think about what only I knew the cookie had represented.

Hey, if the loony can have Fred to feature in made up anecdotes, I'm allowed a fucking horse and cow.”

As a snide remark, we would like to inform Mr Thompson that Fred in his story equates to “friend's little boy - who is eight” in his story and not to the horse and cow. Fred is the one who has to listen to me and has not been taught to go and smell cookies. And yes, you are fully allowed to have your “friend's little boy - who is eight” in the story, plus the horse, the cows, the cookies and the oven.

According to Mr Thompson’s analogy, Eddie the horse smells cookies when they are being made and Keela the cow can only smell cookies after they are made.

We are not trying to mock Mr Thompson, in fact we have made an effort to understand what he has said to be able to show how wrong something is so  one has to understand with clarity what is being defended and in the analogy, as far as we understood, the horse pretends to be Eddie the EVRD dog and the cow, Keela the blood dog.

And that is as far we could go to understand the analogy.

For example, Mr Thompson thinks he has made the cookies represent blood but he makes a blunder. What his analogy shows is what both the horse and the cow are able to smell is dough, not cookies. The horse (Eddie) alerts to dough in all its different stages in the baking process and the other (Keela) only to when it’s finally cooked, when it’s a cookie.

When the author of an analogy gets the analogy wrong, then it’s very hard to make heads or tails of it, no matter how hard one tries. And we tried, we really did.

We understood that Mr Thompson brought in decomposition as the baking process, which we agree he should but as shown above we don’t think he knew what he meant.

One thing that Mr Thompson does not make clear in his analogy is whether the horse also signals the fully cooked cookie, because if he does, Mr Thompson is saying that both dogs are dough dogs. The difference is that one can smell the dough during the entire baking process and the other only at the end. But, bottom line, both horse and cow could both only be alerting to a fully baked cookie.

We think that’s what he means because if the horse (Eddie) could only smell dough before being fully baked and the cow (Keela) only the baked cookie, then their alerts could not be confused and we think he’s trying to give an example how one alert, the one of the baking process, could be confused with just being an alert to a fully baked cookie.

For starters, Mr Thompson gets his animals wrong in the analogy. Decomposition, in regards with what is relevant for the analysis is an evolving process not an end-state, it’s not a baked cookie. His analogy to be correct, he should have said that one animal, Keela the cow was only able to smell unbaked dough, while Eddie the horse could smell dough from unbaked to fully baked.

Then the analogy would make sense because then we could all understand what he was trying to illustrate and that would be how one dog alerted only to fresh blood (unbaked dough) and the other alerted to both fresh (unbaked) and decomposed blood (baked dough).

Even when being criticised by someone who is not nice to us like Mr Thompson, we have to help him out. If that doesn’t show that we are capable to set aside personal differences in the quest for the truth, nothing else will.

So, pushing to the best of our ability to turn  Mr Thompson’s analogy against us,, this is what we think he’s trying to say: Keela alerts to fresh blood (supposedly blood from a living human being) and Eddie to blood both decomposed (supposedly blood from a dead human being) and fresh blood (supposedly from a living human being), meaning Eddie’s alerts could be blood from a living human being, so the body may not have been present in the Scenic, in fact it is Mr Thompson’s firm opinion that it was not.

Honestly, we cannot turn his analogy more against us. If that is possible, our apologies but we will proceed assuming that we have nailed it.


5. The topic of decomposition of blood

Mr Thompson brings up a very interesting point that we have never seen debated: the decomposition of blood.

The decomposition of the entire human being has been discussed but that of blood spilled out of the body, it is something no one speaks of.

People just say, blood from a living person or blood from a dead person, meaning one is “fresh” and the other “decomposed” forgetting that fresh blood, as any biological product undergoes a decomposition process.

Saying decomposed blood is meaningless when it comes to determining whether it came from a living human being (or from a recently diseased one) or from a dead one.

In fact, the blood in a crime scene is more likely to be all fresh blood because usually the victim was alive or in the process of losing their life when the bleeding occurred. Also, the blood could have oozed out very shortly after death, when decomposition hadn’t started or if it had, was not yet noticeable.

There is only one scenario where there no fresh blood and only blood from a dead person and that would be the one where the body is moved after decomposition is noticeable. That’s easy to understand, it’s when a body first enters the premises long after death, the blood it may come out of it cannot be considered fresh. The scenario of the body in the Scenic would fit into that scenario, for example.


This to say a blood dog does not alert to fresh blood but to blood that even though it left the body fresh is within its own blood decomposing process in a status depending on the time lapsed after it left the body.

To be easier to understand, if one was to use a colour palette to illustrate the scents a blood dog alerts to, it would look like this:


Very simple. On the left the scent of fresh blood and on the right, decomposed. The dog would alert to both and all in-between.

Please note that when a blood dog alerts to blood, as time has passed after the bleeding, the scent would be one between somewhere in the middle to the far right of the palette, meaning blood noticeably decomposed, regardless of whether it had been fresh when it contaminated the crime scene.

To understand, if the blood alerted to belongs to Maddie, as we believe it does, it would have left her body during or shortly after her death and would have the exact same characteristics if she had bled it a few hours before when she was alive. In both instances, it would have been fresh blood when spilled but with the decomposition of 3 months when alerted to by Keela.

In practical terms, in apartment 5A Keela would have alerted to Maddie’s blood (a recently dead person) as she would have to the blood from the alleged shaving accident (live person), without establishing any difference about its origins in terms of being a dead or live person.

And this reasoning also applies to the blood alerted to in the Scenic. For Keela, the blood found there is just human blood. This detail may seem unimportant now but is very, very important as the reader will see when we analyse the EVRD dog in the next post.


6. Blood decomposition v Human decomposition

As said above, blood decomposition is a topic that we have never seen debated. And it turns out it is something that should have been, because it is very relevant to the case.

The reader may ask, but isn’t blood decomposition the same as human decomposition?

No, it isn’t. Stand-alone blood, found frequently in crime scenes and in every common household has its own decomposition process, which is way simpler than that of the entire human body.

And it’s quite easy to understand why. Will just bring over what Wikipedia says about blood:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood

“Blood is a body fluid in humans and other animals that delivers necessary substances such as nutrients and oxygen to the cells and transports metabolic waste products away from those same cells.

In vertebrates, it is composed of blood cells suspended in blood plasma. Plasma, which constitutes 55% of blood fluid, is mostly water (92% by volume), and contains proteins, glucose, mineral ions, hormones, carbon dioxide (plasma being the main medium for excretory product transportation), and blood cells themselves. Albumin is the main protein in plasma, and it functions to regulate the colloidal osmotic pressure of blood. The blood cells are mainly red blood cells (also called RBCs or erythrocytes), white blood cells (also called WBCs or leukocytes) and platelets (also called thrombocytes). The most abundant cells in vertebrate blood are red blood cells. These contain hemoglobin, an iron-containing protein, which facilitates oxygen transport by reversibly binding to this respiratory gas and greatly increasing its solubility in blood. In contrast, carbon dioxide is mostly transported extracellularly as bicarbonate ion transported in plasma.”

It contains quite a lot of scientific language but could the above even begin to describe the complexity of the human body? Of course not.

One does not need to have the eye of an eagle to tell apart a tree from a rabbit. They are physically different. One does not need to go read in a science book what makes a tree and rabbit different, one just has to trust one’s eyes. One may have to go and research to tell the differences between a rabbit and a hare apart but not about what distinguishes a tree from a rabbit.

One does not have to do any research to understand that if decomposition is, to sum it up, the process of breakdown of the various “components” of an organism, then general culture is sufficient to understand the difference between the low number of “components” that make up blood with the absurd number of those that make up the entire human body, to see that no comparison between them is possible.

In terms of complexity would be to compare primary school arithmetic with an Abel Prize winning mathematic thesis.

And most of us have had, directly or indirectly, the experience to know the difference and we’re speaking about those who have had the experience of letting meat rot or know of a friend to whom that happened.

That stench which lingers interminably in permeable surfaces, such as occurs when meat is left to defrost and rot in a freezer which has switched off without our noticing; in spite of determined efforts to clean and refresh. A stench so aggressive so distinctive that one can even still smell faint odours from it occasionally long after it was cleaned.

Rotting meat produces a stink, a vile stench that is pungent, very strong and sickening and that is a smell that dried blood doesn’t produce. And how does everyone know that, even those who have been lucky to never have been near rotting meat?

Because decomposed blood does not produce stench and we all have, literally in every household and because of nosebleeds, shaving cuts and kitchen mishaps, decomposed human blood in our houses. If blood produced such a stench, we all would notice and our houses would become unbearable to live in.

The argument may be that the size between a piece of rotting meat and household blood stains differ, only those who have not gone through such an unpleasant experience could ever say such nonsense.

The stench of rotting meat remains after one has washed it away many times, using all chemicals invented and those yet to invent, is so aggressive to the nose. One literally reduces it to quantities invisible to the naked eye and the stench persists. If the decomposition of blood was as anywhere similar in terms of smell to the decomposition of rotting meat, then blood would produce the same stench and it doesn’t.

No one has ever complained about the stench of blood in their homes. In fact, the end result of the decomposition of blood is not an unpleasant smell at all:

https://www.quora.com/What-does-decomposing-blood-look-like-outside-of-the-body

What does decomposing blood look like outside of the body?

The plasma, or the liquid portion, unless in a vial with some type of anticoagulant, will evaporate leaving a film of proteins, which will degrade out of the body. The blood cells will die rather rapidly outside the body as well. So essentially, decomposing blood will smell kind of metallic due to its trace minerals such as iron and copper. It will then appear as a dark reddish stain that has dried up.

Janet Caruana, former Laboratory Technologist at Winthrop University Hospital (1999-2009)
Answered Dec 30 2017 · Author has 2.2k answers and 2.1m answer views”

Kind of metallic. Is that the stench one gets from rotting meat? No, it is not.

It’s very clear that the scent of decomposing blood cannot be confused with the one from human decomposition.

Saying that the EVRD dog also alerts to blood is as ridiculous as saying that Mr Thompson’s horse or cow trained to alert to fully baked cookies would also alert to grilled sardines.


7. Blood decomposition

We are certain the subject has been studied but we could not find any specifics on blood decomposition per se.

Even the Wikipedia page for blood does not mention it at all.

But Janet Caruana is clear that the plasma leaves “a film of proteins, which will degrade out of the body”. Decomposition or degradation is transformation. She also says “that blood cells will die rather rapidly” and we imagine that the same will happen to the white ones.

Meaning that there is some sort of decomposition process that is peculiar to blood. That means that blood straight out of the body, or fresh, will have a different scent than one that is fully decomposed. Blood dogs are trained to react to a scent within this range.

Above would then be the range of scents that Keela, or any blood dog alerts to. She alerts to blood in all its decomposing states.

As a side-note, the above debunks NotTextusa´s gaseous theory of human decomposition. If plasma (which is a significant part of the human body) decomposition leaves “a film of protein” and this is just one of the many, many decomposition processes involved (and this one in particular involves evaporation to boot!) that added up make-up the human decomposition process which produces whatever it does, which we have called cadaver compound, which releases the scent the EVRD dogs are trained to react to.


8. Complexities

The decomposition of a human being is so complex that science has been unable to determine what exactly is happening. One reason for this, is that there are too many variables to quantify. For example, we have spoken of stand-alone blood and that only involves the decomposition of plasma, red and white cells.

The three processes we have just listed are within one that encompasses them which is blood decomposition. Blood decomposition, is but one of many, many decomposition systems within an extremely complex process that is human decomposition.

To compare the description of the decomposition of human blood against the decomposition that happens with the entire human being, would be like describing what the fuel a car uses is made up of compared to describing to all the finest detail of the most technologically advanced spaceship, including the fuel it uses.


That’s why it’s easy to understand the complexity of the scent that the blood alerts to has absolutely no comparison, by default, with the complexity of the scent the EVRD alerts to.

To even attempt to say that because the scent the blood dog alerts to is “within” the scent the one the EVRD alerts to is like the pros attempting to say that Eddie alerts to urine because it contains cadaverine.

The scent the EVRD alerts is one unique scent, not different scents that the dog checks on some sort of check-list that when he has checked reaches a certain number, he puts down the list and alerts.

The fact that a scent has a range does not make it a multitude of scents, like we showed for the blood dog. The scent has a commonality in all its range and that is what makes it unique because it is unique.


9. Dogs in tandem

Are we diminishing Keela’s importance in the detection of blood by saying she just detects blood but being unable to determine if it came from a live or dead person?

We are not, in any way.

This is how we say the dogs work in tandem. Eddie walks in and alerts to an area. That alert limits an area where a cadaver has been. This is unquestionable evidence, not up for debate.

Keela then comes in and helps in the collection of further evidence on site by alerting, if that is the case, to blood and pointing the locations with greater precision than Eddie.

Eddie alerts and Keela doesn’t, it determines forensically the presence of a body within the area/location/object determined by the dog’s trainer.

Eddie alerts and Keela alerts, means that within the area Eddie proved a human dead body had been, there is blood. Again, no need for further forensics.

The pinpointing with precision of exact location where the blood is, to whom the blood belongs to is up to human forensics.

What conclusions can be made after knowing the locations of the blood and to whom the blood belongs to, is up to police intelligence.

The job of the dogs is to say, here was a cadaver and where the cadaver was there is blood. That’s it. And that’s really a lot.


10. Conclusion

The EVRD dog does not alert to blood. That is what the blood dog is for.


The EVRD dog was NOT trained to alert to anything but CADAVER SCENT. Only cadaver scent, human cadaver scent. end of.

To say that the EVRD dog alerts to blood because it’s decomposed blood, is absurd as blood cannot be compared to a human body in terms of complexity. It’s just exploiting how the word “decomposed” sounds in our minds. To say the EVRD dogs alert to decomposed blood has the exactly the same logic as saying that they alert to a decomposed cabbage. 

To say that the EVRD dog alerts to blood is to mislead on purpose. To discredit on purpose the EVRD dog but, and that is the real objective, to reduce the importance of the alerts from BOTH dogs to nothing.

Martin Grime does say “It is my view that it is possible that the EVRD is alerting to 'cadaver scent' contaminant or human blood scent. No evidential or intelligence reliability can be made from this alert unless it can be confirmed with corroborating evidence.”

Martin Grime is pretty adamant and we certainly do not think Martin Grime to be stupid.

But if the simpletons were right about the EVRD dog also alerting to blood, then the supporters of the hoax, in which the McCanns are included, wouldn’t have absolutely anything to worry about whatever results Mark Perlin may produce if his offer is accepted.

As according to them the EVRD alerts in the Scenic could only be blood, a 100% match with Madeleine’s DNA could be explained with blood spilled by her before she disappeared.

But they are worried about the results Mark Perlin may produce, aren’t they? Really worried. Very worried.


Maybe the simpletons should take to their own advice and read, because reading means being able to read beyond a single sentence. Maybe that will stop them having the arrogance of thinking they know more than the Portuguese justice system.


To be continued.

161 comments:

  1. https://twitter.com/PollyGraph69/status/1133263872234803201
    Debbie Lee Perry‏ @PollyGraph69
    Replying to @factsonly10x @littlesnipper_ and 35 others
    you must be so jealous of the textusa team, they are proper genuine researchers. And their blogs are spot on. Jealously gets you no where. bet you wish you could write a blog like them. #McCann
    7:48 AM - 28 May 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/factsonly10x/status/1133571437426561024
    Crimes Unsolved‏ @factsonly10x
    Replying to @PollyGraph69 @littlesnipper_ and 35 others
    Behave, I've only read it twice. Page after page on Walker and even that bored me to death. Anyhow, short arse won't be blogging much longer. #mccann #mccanns
    4:11 AM - 29 May 2019

    *****

    Threat to be reported.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://twitter.com/factsonly10x/status/1132772924123963393
      Crimes Unsolved‏ @factsonly10x
      Replying to @JoanaAMorais
      Do you know where I can get a pair of white leggings like 65 year old Brenda had? Asking for a friend. #mccann #mccanns
      11:18 PM - 26 May 2019

      https://twitter.com/JoanaAMorais/status/1132773505278324736
      Joana Morais‏ @JoanaAMorais
      Replying to @factsonly10x
      you call yourself human? shame on you.
      11:20 PM - 26 May 2019

      Delete
    2. The old account referred to the white leggings as well, talk about giving yourself away. What an utterly vile human being, whoever he/she is doesn't seem to know enough about the case to actually be connected though.

      He/she knows the files but doesn't have a clue what happened to Madeleine.The account IMO is that of a hardened independent who get's a kick out of humiliation.

      Its such a troll when it comes to Brenda Leyland also, so no matter how diligent it is in quoting the files everything else gets defenestrated in one fell swoop when it reveals its true self.

      "The worst of the human psyche electronically unleashed" to quote another clueless journalist in this mad and mysterious affair.

      No, he/she doesn't know enough to be part of the official cover-up IMHO.

      Delete
    3. Gets, not get's. Sorry, typo!

      Delete
  2. https://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-only-thing-that-didnt-happen-was.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. Just to clarify something about this post, we’re not saying in 5A there would be a perceptible stench. The residue left behind by a recently deceased person would not be enough to cause that.

    But the fact that Eddie alerted to it means that yes, there was a stench there, only totally imperceptible to the human nose and only a dog could sense it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. https://twitter.com/hadashocker/status/1133667428586668032
    FullTimeHacker‏ @hadashocker
    Always worth a read. http://textusa.blogspot.com/2019/05/blood-and-evrd-dog-part-1.html?m=1#more …
    #mccann #scam
    10:32 AM - 29 May 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133685484960530432
    J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
    Replying to @hadashocker
    Vital correction needed in that post - the dog EVRD also alerts to blood from a live human being OR only from a cadaver. As you will then note that that one fact changes the context of much of what else is stated as fact in that blog. #Mccann
    11:44 AM - 29 May 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/SadeElishaa/status/1133690715232452608
    00Sade 🕵️‍♀️‏ @SadeElishaa
    Replying to @JBLittlemore @hadashocker
    Jesus Christ 🤦
    12:05 PM - 29 May 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133691191646740482
    J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
    Replying to @SadeElishaa @hadashocker
    Sorry to disappoint ... only JBL ; )))
    12:06 PM - 29 May 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/SadeElishaa/status/1133691622900809728
    00Sade 🕵️‍♀️‏ @SadeElishaa
    Replying to @JBLittlemore @hadashocker
    😆well I am a very well known personality I'll have you know 😂
    12:08 PM - 29 May 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133692504170270720
    J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
    FollowFollow @JBLittlemore
    More
    Replying to @SadeElishaa @hadashocker
    So I am told! Bathe in your stardom! As for me I cannot be any other than JBL (as opposed to JCS ... J C Superstar!!)
    12:12 PM - 29 May 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/SadeElishaa/status/1133693904669351937
    00Sade 🕵️‍♀️‏ @SadeElishaa
    Replying to @JBLittlemore @hadashocker
    I can't bear to read it all, but a quick scan shows it's the usual outright lies about the dogs, some ridiculous drawings demonstrating the catastrophic inability to understand the most basic concepts...and....a pinch of obsession. The usual recipe. #McCann
    12:17 PM - 29 May 2019

    ******

    “the dog EVRD also alerts to blood from a live human being OR only from a cadaver”

    So Eddie is just a Keela 2.0, is he? Just an ugrade?

    If so, why not shelf Keela 1.0 instead of using her with Keela 2.0? Sentimental reasons?

    We invite JBLittlemore (who we strongly suspect to have been the scientific source for NotTextusa all these years) to provide links to back up his statement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133705325033512961
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      Textusa: We invite JBLittlemore (who we strongly suspect to have been the scientific source for NotTextusa all these years) to provide links to back up his statement.
      So, for you, from the horse's mouth ... ; ) I only knew of NT recently & he does not need my advice! #Mccann
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7u59tYW0AAQ-p3.png
      1:03 PM - 29 May 2019

      [picture attached is a screengrab from Martin Grime’s rogatory.
      http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_RIGATORY.htm

      This sentence is highlighted:
      “'The dog EVRD also alerts to blood from a live human being or only from a cadaver'”]

      Delete
    2. The sentence JBLittlemore quotes is from the PJ and not Martin Grime saying it.

      The question is “Does the EVRD dog also give alerts to blood leads from a human with life or just from a cadaver?”

      Martin Grime’s reply is:

      “The EVRD dog is trained with complete and disaggregated material, blood, bone tissue, teeth, etc. crossed contaminants in decomposition. The dog will recognise in its entirety or ‘belonging parts’ of a human cadaver. He’s not trained for ‘live’ human odours, no trained dog would recognise the scent of ‘fresh blood’. They however locate, and give the alert to dried blood from a live human being.”

      Delete
    3. We stand by what we have written. The phrase from Grime is clear. We will deal with this subject in our following post but we believe that he was trying to safeguard the importance of Eddie's alerts in the Scenic.

      Either he was unfortunate in the choice of words, or the translator may have missed the point. That phrase alone would have invalidated the findings and it would have never been a proven fact that marks of a human cadaver were found in the Scenic as per the list of proven facts made up by the court.

      We ask the question, if the EVRD dog alerts to dry blood from a live human being, then what is his use? The question is not in favour or against Martin Grime but in favour of the truth.

      If Eddie detected blood from a person who was alive at the time of bleeding, he would be of little use in finding bodies, as there would be more likelihood of being constantly distracted by irrelevant, and more frequently deposited, blood.

      And isn’t dried blood from a live human being a live human odour?

      Only Martin Grime can explain what he meant.

      We will continue to present our reasons, as we have done, and leave up to the readers to make up their minds.

      We have this annoying habit of trusting our own eyes.

      Delete
    4. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133731357211938816
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      Martin Grime's Rogatory was NOT translated so no reason to allege error. He confirmed in his first language that the EVRD will also alert to DRIED BLOOD from a live human. It is the flawed understanding of how & why the dogs worked in tandem that is the issue for some. #mccann
      2:46 PM - 29 May 2019

      *****

      Apologies, we didn’t know Martin Grime spoke Portuguese so well. And quite fluently. To compare his Portuguese with Jules’ would be comparing the complexity of human decomposition with blood’s:
      http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/CR3/cr3_23.jpg

      “O cão EVRD também dá o alerta a pistas sanguíneas de um humano com vida ou somente de um cadáver?

      O cão EVRD é treinado utilizando material completo e desagregado, sangue, tecidos ósseos, dentes, etc e contaminantes em decomposição. O cão reconhecerá ne integra ou ‘partes constituintes’ de um cadáver humano. Ele não é treinado para odores humanos ‘vivos’, nenhum cão treinado reconheceria o cheiro de ‘sangue fresco’. Eles localizam porém, e dão alerta para sangue seco de um humano com vida.”

      By the way, the word “desagregado” is translated in the PJ Files as “disintegrated” when it means “disaggregated”. See how things get lost in translation?

      To be clear, Martin Grime has said “It is my view that it is possible that the EVRD is alerting to 'cadaver scent' contaminant or human blood scent” and is said by a translator to have said “They [EVRD dogs] however locate, and give the alert to dried blood from a live human being.”

      Delete
    5. I think there's a HELL of a difference between I mean there's a HELL of a difference (IMO) between 'disintegrated' and 'disaggregate'
      /dɪsˈaɡrɪɡeɪt/

      past tense: disaggregated; past participle: disaggregated
      separate (something) into its component parts.
      "a method for disaggregating cells"

      Delete
    6. https://twitter.com/HiDeHo3/status/1133444051913596929
      https://twitter.com/HiDeHo3/status/1133455316383883265
      Could Silverdoe, who liked this tweet, please inform Lizzy HdH that it’s not cadaver odour but only blood?

      Interesting how the gang are distracting from what Mr Thompson said very clearly: he doesn’t believe Maddie’s body was in the car, EVER.

      Silver tweets that alerts could be ONLY be blood and yet promotes the video about alerts in the car. Isn’t that strange?

      We need to ask a clear question to the gang: do you believe Maddie’s body was carried in the car boot, yes or no?

      Mr Thompson: No
      NT ?
      Sade ?
      Jules ?
      Silver ?
      JBL ?

      To those who say yes, could they please justify as to why they believe that to have been so?

      We know you are reading.

      Delete
    7. https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1133798670237917184
      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1133800211141341184

      Delete
    8. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133765268889645057
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      Before I have to return to my desk my answer is that I agree with Ben with regard to their being no proof to confirm that Madeleine was ever in the boot of the Scenic. There is none. To that I will not state that she was. #Mccann
      5:01 PM - 29 May 2019

      Delete
    9. When we read the tweet from JBLittlemore, we laughed. We’re talking about the tweet already transcribed above:
      https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133705325033512961

      And then we made and published a comment mocking JBLittlemore. But then deleted that comment because we thought were being too literal, as we honestly thought JBLittlemore could not be that stupid.

      It turns out he could.

      And this tweet confirms that:

      https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133713185083658241
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      J B Littlemore Retweeted J B Littlemore
      Further to your new comment based on scraping my tweet - surely you can see the highlighted comment in my link is EXACTLY the quoted one you required I prove? The very one you used to mock me & indicate Keela was a 1.0 instead of a 2.0 - ye gods! #Mccann
      J B Littlemore added,
      https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133705325033512961
      1:34 PM - 29 May 2019

      He leaves no doubt that he is referring specifically to the highlighted comment in his link: “surely you can see the highlighted comment in my link is EXACTLY the quoted one you required I prove”. To nothing else.

      The reason why we were mocking him in the first place and then retracted was because, as we said, we thought he couldn’t be as stupid as to be quoting that particular phrase, and anticipating that he would come back with a “I was obviously meaning what was written below…” which would silence us, we deleted the comment.

      It turns out that he was indeed quoting that phrase!

      And this is the phrase, it was a question written by the PJ for Martin Grime to answer:
      - In Portuguese (as it is in the PJFiles), “O cão EVRD também dá o alerta a pistas sanguíneas de um humano com vida ou somente de um cadáver?”
      - Our translation (published in our comment at 29 May 2019, 13:40:00): “Does the EVRD dog also give alerts to blood leads from a human with life or just from a cadaver?”
      - Translation in the McCannPJFiles site: “ 'The dog EVRD also alerts to blood from a live human being or only from a cadaver'”.

      JBLittlemore quotes what the PJ wrote to be asked as what was said by Martin Grime!

      Then he confirms that he absolutely has not realised that those words are not from Grime:

      https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133728597125025793
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      Replying to @Jules1602xx
      But Textusa has just admitted the same point - "He’s not trained for ‘live’ human odours, no trained dog would recognise the scent of ‘fresh blood’. They (EVRD) however locate, and GIVE THE ALERT TO DRIED BLOOD FROM A LIVE HUMAN BEING." Fact. #Mccann
      2:35 PM - 29 May 2019

      The words in CAPS are indeed from Grime but they are our translation of them! The he says that we admitted to a point made by the PJ in a question.

      This clearly shows how this individual hasn’t not read the files. Until this afternoon, until we showed him what in reality Grime had said (we have already helped Mr Thompson with his analogy, now we had to help JBLittlemore), he was basing his certainty that the EVRD dogs alerted to blood from a live person and blood from a dead person on the words of some PJ officer!

      Of the 2 quotes in the files where Grime speaks of the issue dealt with in the post, one is in the blog that we said we were going to deal with it in our next post, and the other he didn’t even realise it wasn’t from Grime!

      Just shows they don’t even know what they read.

      Delete
    10. And then guess who comes into the quote not being Grime but from the PJ debate? Jules, the beholder of the most famous and most secret photos of the Big Round Table (130 days since Jan 19):

      https://twitter.com/Jules1602xx/status/1133760828702953472
      00The Jules... 🕵️‍♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸‏ @Jules1602xx
      Replying to @JBLittlemore
      He should correct his accidental on purpose mistake pronto..
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7vtdQ8XoAE8CD-.jpg
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7vtdc0XoAAc3gG.jpg
      4:43 PM - 29 May 2019

      [Pic #1, from our blog:
      “Textusa29 May 2019, 13:40:00
      The sentence JBLittlemore quotes is from the PJ and not Martin Grime saying it.
      The question is “Does the EVRD dog also give alerts to blood leads from a human with life or just from a cadaver?””
      Pic #2, from the McCannPJFiles:
      [“[red dot]'The dog EVRD also alerts to blood from a live human being or only from a cadaver' [red dot]
      The dog EVRD is trained using whole and disintegrated material, blood, bone tissue, teeth, etc. and decomposed cross-contaminants. The dog will recognize all or parts of a human cadaver. He is not trained for 'live' human odours; no”]

      ****

      What is between the red dots 'The dog EVRD also alerts to blood from a live human being or only from a cadaver' is the “sentence JBLittlemore quotes [that] is from the PJ and not Martin Grime saying it”, which is absolutely correct. So what “accidental on purpose mistake” do we have to correct? Not seeing any.

      Just shows that these people have no convictions based on the PJFiles.

      Second time Jules makes this mistake. Last time she said she was owned, will she say it again?

      Honestly, we couldn’t make this up even if we tried.

      Fred is having a blast.

      Delete
    11. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133731357211938816
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      Martin Grime's Rogatory was NOT translated so no reason to allege error. He confirmed in his first language that the EVRD will also alert to DRIED BLOOD from a live human. It is the flawed understanding of how & why the dogs worked in tandem that is the issue for some. #mccann
      2:46 PM - 29 May 2019

      *****
      https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133754732638625796
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      Replying to @Jules1602xx
      Martin Grime gave his Rogatory Statement in ENGLISH - as presented. It was then translated into Portuguese for the purposes of the PJ. What he said in the statement is exactly what he said! No arguing with it. EVRD alerts to DRIED blood of live human as well as cadaver. #Mccann
      4:19 PM - 29 May 2019

      *****

      JBLittlemore,

      No, what is presented is the translation into Portuguese of that rogatory. What you have quoted is the English translation for the website McCannPJFiles. The translation into English of what was originally in English but translated into Portuguese.

      So, every reason to allege error.

      Delete
    12. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133836963566497792
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      "Eddie would be sent in first <>as part of an investigation to check & if he alerted then Keela was sent in <>if Keela also alerted the alert was to blood as that is all that Keela is trained to detect. If she did not alert too then Eddie was alerting to cadaver scent." #Mccann
      9:46 PM - 29 May 2019

      *****

      And because one cannot retrieve DNA from the cadaver residue, then there will never be a DNA match, so no one will ever know to whom the body belonged to.

      In the locations where both dogs alerted to – which are the locations in which Keela alerts because she’s brought in to the areas alerted to by Eddie – the DNA collected in meaningless because the “cadaver” side of Eddie’s alerts is to be ignored because he could only have alerted to blood, so there’s no link that can be established with absolutely any certainty between that blood and any death.

      So says the man who until yesterday was quoting “The dog EVRD also alerts to blood from a live human being or only from a cadaver” as being from Martin Grime, when it’s an incorrect translation of a question made by the PJ and so in fact no one said it.

      So says the man who says that Keela COULD have alerted to blood.

      So says the man who couldn’t care less about what the PT courts have said.

      Delete
    13. Silverdoe (Anonymous 29 May 2019, 19:24:00),

      Eddie alerted to the seal of the car, where Grime send the scent was emanating from.

      Keela entered the car and alerted in the boot.

      We didn’t say what you believed in - we asked you what you believed in and the answer is as clear as the one to the Hynd’s question: Nyes.

      Delete
    14. From NotTextusa’s blog:

      “[quoting our blog] According to Mr Thompson, there is no ironclad proof that Madeleine’s body was EVER in the Scenic. [end quote]

      And he's absolutely correct - there isn't”

      Delete
    15. Update on the question "do you believe Maddie’s body was carried in the car boot, yes or no?"

      Mr Thompson: No
      NotTextusa: No
      Sade ?
      Jules ?
      Silver: Nyes
      JBLittlemore: No

      Delete
    16. https://twitter.com/SadeElishaa/status/1133840301565599744
      00Sade 🕵️‍♀️‏ @SadeElishaa
      Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx
      Wouldn't surprise me. The sheer audacity of peddling these utter lies is just incredible, but the cheek of slating those who actually stick to facts 😂
      Yes Textusa, we've had to agree with pros over this. Pros are literally more truthful than you. Let that sink in 🖕#McCann
      9:59 PM - 29 May 2019

      *****

      Sade,

      You know who agrees with us? Gonçalo Amaral.

      He must be a pro like us.

      Delete
    17. From "FB Anon":

      "In this video it’s stated very clearly that Keela alerts to blood & Eddie to human remains."

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijFQ_G9QNYo&fbclid=IwAR2HWl7ZcSCkocLyEmH-uSQWsdjD6Shu-qDxSw6nlzEvwJdgm7ml7Z38EQ4

      Delete
    18. Interesting tweet, bringing it over to the blog:

      https://twitter.com/CruftMs/status/1134024135775010816
      Ms Myrtle Willoughby Cruft‏ @CruftMs
      I found some interesting research (2018) by Martin Grime, he goes into so much detail. Obvs. a very busy and diligent man and STILL a respected Expert in the UK Forensic science community. He credits Mark Harrison and other colleagues in his white paper. #mccann
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7zcYyuXoAAxSch.png
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7zcbmKW4AA8Gkx.png
      10:09 AM - 30 May 2019

      [Picture #1:
      “18.0 SUMMARY
      Properly trained, proficient, and mission effective detection canines provide a qualitative olfactory detection solution within a layered, mission focused, search strategy. They are not considered quantitative but may be presumptive. Detection canine responses therefore require corroboration either instrumentally, visually or by anecdotal witness evidence. The weight of evidence in relation to detection canine responses will be considered within judicial process. Not by members of the public, the press, or anonymous critique within internet forums”]

      [Picture #2:
      “10.0 CORROBORATION IN THE ABSENCE OF RECOVERED HUMAN REMAINS OR BLOOD
      The same concept applies throughout the detection phase of search. All resources can provide both positive and negative results. Both positive and negative results should be corroborated by as many other resources as is appropriate and practicable before attempting to interpret or recover.
      A VRD alert followed by a forensic search of the alert site will either result in the recovery of human remains or blood, or not. A recovery can be used as proof of accuracy. However, no recovery following an alert does not necessarily mean that the dog was incorrect in that residual odour or trace evidence may have been present, or concealment may have precluded discovery.
      Humans should not be so arrogant as to assume that they are right merely because they are the head of the food chain. All canine responses should be investigated to complete satisfaction, considering all relevant intelligence and scientific principles.”]

      Delete
    19. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134078951532507137
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      Textusa 12.40 5. You demanded I provide a link to a comment I posted – I highlighted exactly that comment. As most recognise (but I failed to highlight entirely) I was referring to the entire paragraph which included Martin Grime’s answer – the same context! #Mccann
      1:47 PM - 30 May 2019

      *****

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

      Do add this to JBLittlemore’s beliefs:

      https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133853019760713729
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      Replying to @SadeElishaa @xxSiLverdoexx
      Well done 00Sade. I don't know anything about any Textusa post about Mrs May - why would he post anything about her? Surely not tied in with Mccann case? Surely not ...
      10:50 PM - 29 May 2019

      *****
      https://twitter.com/SadeElishaa/status/1133855077180030978
      00Sade 🕵️‍♀️‏ @SadeElishaa
      Replying to @JBLittlemore @xxSiLverdoexx
      I kid you not 🤫
      10:58 PM - 29 May 2019

      *****
      https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1133857554365321216
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      FollowFollow @JBLittlemore
      More
      Replying to @SadeElishaa @xxSiLverdoexx
      Well no doubt his plot synopsis regarding Mrs May's Tale will be a huge hit with old fans & self publishing enables him to 'publish' the full tome of wild plots & twists in the tail? Thankfully I'm too busy with War & Peace at present ; )
      11:08 PM - 29 May 2019

      *****

      So, for JBLittlemore (and for Jules) Theresa May is totally oblivious about the Maddie case. The last time they asked her about Maddie, she replied “Who?”

      Delete
    20. To make it clear for all the gang’s hierarchy:

      https://twitter.com/Jules1602xx/status/1047988628272697346
      00The Jules... 🕵️‍♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸‏ @Jules1602xx
      Replying to @FragrantFrog
      I take it Fred [nothing to do with Textusa, a character mentioned by the Frog] was evil... :)
      Instead of rooting them out you joined them... :)
      But we're Bunny girls... :)
      Major B and Major NT call the shots but we're one big happy team... :)
      JBL is the Godfather... He is God.. :)
      12:15 AM - 5 Oct 2018

      Delete
    21. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134079173138497536
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      Textusa 12.40 7. Finally I highly respect the PT courts as I make clear regularly. Why ignore that to attack me on the simple basis I cannot yet agree it is (scientifically) corroborated/proven the dogs alerted to blood & cadaver? Have the courts seen the proof? #Mccann
      1:48 PM - 30 May 2019

      *****
      Neither in Portugal nor in the UK it’s not habitual procedure to ask a judge on whether s/he is sure of what s/he has written in a decision.

      One may not agree with a judge’s decision and one then may present arguments as to why one disagrees with the decision. Never seen a case of someone asking a judge, “did you really mean proven?” or “did you see the proof before you wrote proven?” or even “are you a nutcase who doesn’t know what the word proven means?”.

      But you can try and be the first. Please write to the Portuguese Supreme Justice court, last court to analyse the case in Portugal and ask “Have the courts seen the proof?”

      Delete
    22. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134079052229369857
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      Textusa 12.40 6. If you read my tweets (versus picking some to satisfy your need to enact abusive behaviour) you will see that I argue that those pro ‘no blood found’ arguments with ‘unidentified cellular material’ as COULD BE BLOOD. Stop twisting. #Mccann
      1:48 PM - 30 May 2019

      *****

      JBLittlemore: Textusa I did not say what you say I said, what I really said is what you said I said, so stop twisting.

      We said “So says the man who says that Keela COULD have alerted to blood” and he says, “with ‘unidentified cellular material’ as COULD BE BLOOD”.

      By the way, this “COULD be blood” was debating with specifically if Keela had alerted to blood because according to you it COULD only be blood (as you are saying above) – and not with any pro.

      Delete
  5. Well known personalities? With all due respect, you're giving these meaningless fools far more attention than they deserve.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 29 May 2019, 13:57:00,

      We only published the thread.

      Delete
    2. Textusa, do you have any theory as to where Madeleine is now? It's been over twelve years and it seems like no-one on the internet or MSM have a clue.

      Thoughts?

      Delete
  6. From NotTextusa’s blog, Sade Anslow reporting to boss:

    SadeElisha29 May 2019 at 15:47
    😁
    The newest one is even more insane. I do hope you find the time to wade through it NT, but pour a large glass first.

    Not Textusa29 May 2019 at 19:21
    Oh for the love of god - is he a masochist? How many times does he want to be ritually humiliated like this ? :))

    He's an absolute bell end

    And from Twitter:

    https://twitter.com/Jules1602xx/status/1133753612960698370
    00The Jules... 🕵️‍♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸‏ @Jules1602xx
    Replying to @JBLittlemore
    You noted his [Textusa] twist of the question asked to Mr Grime too.. ?
    4:15 PM - 29 May 2019

    *****

    NotTextusa, Jules,

    - Trish Hills Allen
    - Paul Rees
    - Kirstie Murray
    - Ben Thompson
    - Natalie Charlesworth
    - Netty Estelle

    In the names above, there are 2 gender-fake people. You know, like we do, there are. When are you going to doxx them?

    The list had not yet made it into this post. Now, thanks to you, it has.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://twitter.com/SadeElishaa/status/1133863493227241473
      00Sade 🕵️‍♀️‏ @SadeElishaa
      Replying to @JBLittlemore @xxSiLverdoexx
      Isn't it just! Well would ya just lookit - Tut tut. Textusa's minions being brain dead was only going to serve him for so long, eh? Dearie dearie me. I trust Debbie will get her name up in lights now Textusa? Demanding her, erm, knowledge 😑? 😂#McCann
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7xK1GLWkAAAfwb.jpg
      11:31 PM - 29 May 2019

      [Picture attached is a screengrab of this tweet:
      https://twitter.com/PollyGraph69/status/1133764020954107904
      Debbie Lee Perry‏ @PollyGraph69
      Replying to @strackers74 @Jules1602xx and 3 others
      speaking of zora setting people up, she couldn't of met the Textusa Team or the man i met, cos he ain't short, stumpy, gay or whatever else she said about him, so who's been set up eh zora? looks like you were hun, do you really believe you met one of team from Textusa pmsl
      4:56 PM - 29 May 2019]

      *****

      Sade,

      Let us give you a hint. Did you, Mr Thompson, NotTextusa or Jules Chrimes tell us which are the 2 gender-fakes of these 6 people who are (Natalie is no longer): Trish Hills Allen, Paul Rees, Kirstie Murray, Ben Thompson, Natalie Charlesworth and Netty Estelle?

      No, none of you have. That means for us to know from DIFFERENT sources that, it means the DIFFERENT people also know. Are we asking them to doxx the gender-fake people in the Admin of Justice for Madeleine FB group? No, we are not, we won’t as there is absolutely no reason for us to ask them to do that.

      And to be clear we don’t want the gender-fake people in the Admin of Justice for Madeleine FB group to be doxed, what we want is your hypocrisy exposed. That is what we want and what we have achieved.

      All of you were Admin in Justice for Madeleine FB, Debbie Lee Perry was not. Even if she had been, has Debbie made gender-faking an issue? She has not.

      Debbie Lee Perry, as far as we know, has not sat along side with gender-faking people while allegedly doxxing someone else’s alleged gender-faking and continue to persist in that alleged doxxing.

      If Debbie Lee Perry was or had been Admin in Justice for Madeleine FB group AND (important) made gender-faking an issue, you can bet your bottom dollar her name would be added to the list.

      As an example of this, we are not asking any of the 4 other members of Justice Admin to doxx out their friends (even though they all happily liked the comments made on gender-faking outraged by Mr Thompson there) nor do we intend to.

      We demanding you, Mr Thompson, NotTextusa and Jules Chrimes to doxx your friends, is not about doxxing but your hypocrisy.

      About the content of Debbie Lee Perry’s tweet, it affects us as much as the content of any of your doxxing. Nothing. And, as always, we neither confirm nor deny.

      By the way, we are waiting for you to submit a mail to where we can send your do not publish comment so you can reread it and we know that you have so.

      Delete
    2. A screengrab of a comment made (undated, just says 1 yr ago) by Netty Estelle in the Justice for Madeleine FB group:

      “Netty Estelle

      I don’t “get” textusa. She (he, actually, I am pretty sure most of the writing is executed by a bored, priapic but ageing male) bangs on about swinging but… what’s the evidence? Is there any, even a suggestion?”

      Delete
    3. “So you can insert your threats up your hairy Iberian arse, Mario. You'll find it between your short fat legs”, NotTextusa at 30 May 2019 at 22:45, in his blog.

      If the allegations were to be true, is “hairy Iberian arse” more or less derogatory in xenophobic terms than “sardine-muncher”? Asking for a friend.

      Delete
  7. From “FB Anon”:

    “If there’s no evidence that MMcC’s body was ever in the car boot, then why the need for Sandy Cameron’s statement. Do the gang think his statement is truthful or not? If he’s lying, then why is he lying?”

    ReplyDelete
  8. We would like to ask the gang another question.

    What is the useful intelligence an EVRD is supposed to bring? If a cadaver was on site. If the body is on site, no need for a dog.

    What is the MOST PROBABLE, the MOST LIKELY biological product to be found in a crime scene? Blood most likely to be from a live person, dying.

    What is the use for the police any animal that can’t tell them apart?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Another question:

    An alert that is only given by Eddie, is it really cadaver scent or could it be blood that Keela failed, for whatever reason, to detect?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi how are you? I have started reading about the case a while ago, and what has happened to many of us, an inexplicable interest that prevents me from stopping looking for information. I found this post very interesting and I look forward to the next one. I have never been much doubts those claims that may have alerted only Eddie blood for the simple reason that they were in many places apartments and cars, and that bad luck have the macann no one had a small accident unimportant there ... or even think that if that will suffice, Eddie would not stop warning until when they take him to urinate in the square. But obviously I do not stop wondering if nobody could contact this expert scientist to clarify in more detail what he meant in that controversial paragraph ... do you have information? because in 12 years, and I calculate still lives, maybe someone managed to agree to specify this. a pleasure to read. from Uruguay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Juana,

      We are not aware of any urinating episode with Eddie. Do you have a link?

      Thank you

      Delete
  11. It just became clearer to me that the real importance of Keela was to gather DNA evidence as Eddie’s alerts were to something that couldn’t be used to extract DNA.

    ReplyDelete
  12. From NotTextusa’s blog:

    “[quoting our blog]We intend to be bold with these 2 posts as at the end of them, show very clearly that Eddie did not alert to blood, decomposed or otherwise and we also intend to show what we believe Mr Grime meant when he said what he said. [end quote]
    Ah - so you are going to interpret that which was unable to be scientifically ratified 12 years ago in a highly sophisticated forensic lab, and…”

    *****

    NotTextusa trusts the FSS and its report on Maddie.

    One can just quote Luiz Felipe Scolari: “E o burro sou eu?”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhYmRjJHmec

    ReplyDelete
  13. https://twitter.com/Jules1602xx/status/1128403478316036097
    00The Jules... 🕵️‍♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸‏ @Jules1602xx
    100% definetly no swinging.. Fact..
    There was defo a #BRT though..
    You're welcome.. #McCann
    9:55 PM - 14 May 2019 from Sint Maarten

    *****
    https://twitter.com/Anvil161Anvil16/status/1134041375320748032
    Whispering‏ @Anvil161Anvil16
    Replying to @Jules1602xx
    and I thought you only dealt in facts? #McCann
    11:18 AM - 30 May 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/Jules1602xx/status/1134042049269915653
    00The Jules... 🕵️‍♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸‏ @Jules1602xx
    Replying to @Anvil161Anvil16
    Put proof of these V.I.P's up and swinging and I'll delete my comment.. :)
    11:21 AM - 30 May 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/Anvil161Anvil16/status/1134042806656352257
    Whispering‏ @Anvil161Anvil16
    Replying to @Jules1602xx
    No no - you're the one dealing in facts...
    11:24 AM - 30 May 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/Jules1602xx/status/1134043042946715648
    00The Jules... 🕵️‍♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸‏ @Jules1602xx
    Replying to @Anvil161Anvil16
    Confirming you don't.. ?
    I admire your honesty.. For once.. :)
    11:25 AM - 30 May 2019

    *****

    So, and going solely along with your logic, your failure to put up the pics and e-mails you say you have and that you said on Jan 19 you were going to use them to own the blog is a confirmation that you don’t have them?

    ReplyDelete
  14. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134078606404149248
    J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
    Textusa 12.40 2. Eddie alerted to DRIED blood + the scent of human decomposition (compound), like it or not. Keela was his counter operational canine in effect. I have never stated Eddie’s alerts are to be ignored but they must be corroborated in some demonstrable manner. #Mccann
    1:46 PM - 30 May 2019

    ReplyDelete
    Replies


    1. Now this is a VERY INTERESTING tweet. SO INTERESTING that we have “extracted” it from the thread above and give it the visibility it deserves.

      Oh, we like it! JBLittlemore has (almost) nailed it!

      In fact, Mr Thompson can thank you because we were going use as the next post’s opening picture the same one we used for the current post (we had our reasons to do that, more specifically to explain why the cat in it so we’ll just have to find another way to fit the cat lifeguard question which remains to be important) and now we have to use this one. We really have to.

      The problem with the deceiving when knowing the truth is that the truth is in the back of one’s mind when one is deceiving. Sometimes, truth just comes up for breath.

      We have to thank you for recognising that it is a compound.

      We have never denied the alerts need to be corroborated, as Grime himself states that.

      If the alerts didn’t need further corroboration, none of us would be here, debating and arguing.

      The McCanns would have been charged and the case would have been put before a court.

      Delete
    2. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134122601339658241
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      Textusa 16.24. By 'compound' I am referring to the blend/mixture of the many separate components which combine to produce the sum cadaver odour. Nothing other than that. Not your apparently oily substance etc. So you know! #Mccann
      4:41 PM - 30 May 2019

      *****

      😂😂😂😂😂

      You mean the gases that blend/mixture of the many separate components which combine to produce the sum cadaver odour?

      You disagree with the Rat? Our CAPS:

      https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1129331479786377216
      Ismail A Rat‏ @IsmailARat5
      Replying to @IsmailARat5 @Cerb32 and 35 others
      Let’s establish somehing, because I don’t like all the implications that I’m an “anti McCann” and stupid to boot...
      THE DOG IS A CADAVER DETECTION EVRD.
      IT DOESN’T ALERT TO NOTHING.
      IT ALERTS TO PRESENCE OF CADAVER RESIDUE. NOT SOMETHING BLOWN IN THE WIND, BUT ACTUAL PARTICLES
      11:23 AM - 17 May 2019

      *****
      https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1129332715029975042
      Ismail A Rat‏ @IsmailARat5
      Replying to @IsmailARat5 @Cerb32 and 35 others
      FROM OILY SECRETION BONDED TO SURFACES.
      And I honestly don’t give a toss about who gets convicted for what.
      But what I want to know is which Fokkers have been making or taking dead bodies with them on holiday on the Algarve and how is no one noticing?
      Airport security don’t
      11:27 AM - 17 May 2019

      Delete
    3. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134123608660426752
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      And I very much regret that because of the repeated onslaught from the worrying individual over on Textusa, who is simply out to twist the words of & destroy anyone who doesn't agree with swinging, oily stuff, round tables & abusing a 'gang' I'll be locking my account. #Mccann
      4:45 PM - 30 May 2019

      Delete
  15. By the way, another question for the gang (especially for those who say that Maddie was never in the Scenic), what is your opinion of the significance of the 15 markers in the car?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not part of the gang Textusa, but I have a quick question for you. What is your opinion on the control sample? Trustworthy and authentic? Or not?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous 30 May 2019, 18:12:00,

      Can you tell us which control sample are you referring to?

      Thank you

      Delete
    3. The one from Leicester allegedly belonging to Madeleine.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous 30 May 2019, 21:44:00,

      We see you are referring to the pillowcase from Rothley, used to extract Maddie’s DNA.

      Although her worn clothing in the apartment would have contained her DNA but it could have also contained DNA from other family.

      The pillowcase was tested and shown to have DNA different to S and A.

      The control sample eventually obtained was the cardboard frame containing M’s Guthrie-heel prick test, which all newborns have.

      The case was too high-profile to doubt that the control sample was not 100% right.

      https://www.dummies.com/education/science/forensics/how-and-why-forensics-experts-collect-control-samples/

      Delete
  16. NotTextusa has now updated his “medieval graveyard” theory:

    “[quoting our blog] To this very direct and specific question from us: “If only gas and only airborne contamination why was the scent detected in the backyard? It’s open air, impossible for airborne molecules to remain floating there.”

    NotTextusa, the scientist replied in his blog:

    “Well, why do you think? Might interest you to know that it’s impossible to field walk in this country without finding small pieces of human bone, due to centuries of ploughing disturbing medieval graves. Consequently, it finds its way into the topsoil very readily. Try thinking outside the box for a change.” [end of quote]

    And as I have reiterated countless times, contrary to your much-repeated bullshit, nowhere did I say that Flat 5A lay over the site of a medieval graveyard, something you are still claiming despite my words being RIGHT THERE.

    What I pointed out to you, oh bear of little brain, is that human bone can find its way into the topsoil as a result of centuries of ploughing over the site of ancient burials. I'm sorry my knowledge and qualifications offend you, which they clearly do. I can't help the fact that it makes you jealous and insecure, which it clearly does.“

    *****

    It’s not medieval graveyards, it predates that, it’s “site of ancient burial”.

    Pre-historic bones have found their way from pre-historic burial sites to a flowerbed of an apartment in Praia da Luz.

    Oh, by “ancient” you don’t necessarily mean pre-historic. You mean just bodies buried in the past and ploughed over?

    Maybe the ‘coveiro’ was moonlighting with some gardening?

    Truly the Village of the Damned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps a film crew shot Michael Jackson's "Thriller" near the very same spot in PDL. Or George Romero's 'Night of the Living Dead'... (I see dead people in the neighbourhood to mishmash a few other titles).

      Delete
    2. I’ve heard it all now, over the years;
      excuses for the dogs’ alerts. A carpenter’s severed finger left in the apartment, dead grandad’s pyjamas, dirty nappies, sweaty shoes, and now, an ancient burial ground.
      It’s certainly ripe in that area.

      Delete
    3. From NotTextusa’s blog:

      “Not Textusa30 May 2019 at 18:12

      Some articles where ancient human bone was found in topsoil

      https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/jul/27/archaeologist-roman-bone-fragments-york

      https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/10266743.a23-medieval-bones-were-accidentally-dumped/

      https://www.ipsley.org/printer-friendly.php?page_id=124”

      *****

      We got it wrong.

      It was not medieval bones. It wasn’t pre-historic bones. It wasn’t the ‘coveiro’ doing gardening.

      It was… Roman!

      Apologies to our readers. We missed that one.

      Delete
    4. From “FB Anon”:

      “Here's Sade's reply to NT:
      SadeElisha30 May 2019 at 19:17
      Excellent NT
      Hilarious as ever.


      Yes, Sade's not wrong - it is hilarious!”

      Delete
  17. Summary by Martin Grime (our CAPS):
    https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES.htm#mg2470

    “SUMMARY

    The tasking for this operation was as per my normal Standard Operating Procedures. The dogs are deployed as search assets to secure evidence and locate human remains or Human blood.

    The dogs only alerted to property associated with the McCann family. The dog alert indications MUST be corroborated if to establish their findings as evidence.

    Therefore in this particular case, as no human remains were located, the only alert indications that may become corroborated are those that the CSI dog indicated by forensic laboratory analysis.

    MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION AS REGARDS TO THE EVRD'S ALERT INDICATIONS IS THAT IT IS SUGGESTIVE THAT THIS IS 'CADAVER SCENT' CONTAMINANT. This does not however suggest a motive or suspect as cross contamination could be as a result of a number of given scenarios and in any event no evidential or intelligence reliability can be made from these alerts unless they can be confirmed with corroborating evidence.”

    ReplyDelete
  18. https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/how-sniffer-dogs-signalled-scent-14141404.amp
    Read what Grime said in documentary.
    He’s quite clear that E only alerts to cadaver odour.
    It’s in quotation marks.
    Not that Netflix was an accurate doc, but it quotes Grime.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 31 May 2019, 11:17:00,

      Thank you!

      Bringing it over to the blog:


      https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/how-sniffer-dogs-signalled-scent-14141404.amp

      How sniffer dogs signalled 'scent of blood and corpse' in Madeleine McCann apartment

      New Netflix series The Disappearance Of Madeleine McCann shows the moment sniffer dogs 'alert' their handler to blood and corpse odours inside the McCanns' holiday apartment

      by Emmeline Saunders
      18:08, 15 Mar 2019Updated10:25, 16 Mar 2019

      This is the shocking moment a sniffer dog trained to smell blood signalled his owner in Kate and Gerry McCann's bedroom.

      The old evidence, which did not lead anywhere, is featured in new Netflix eight-parter The Disappearance Of Madeleine McCann.

      Three-year-old British girl Madeleine McCann went missing from her holiday apartment in the Portuguese resort of Praia Da Luz on May 3 2007.

      The new series shows how stumped Portuguese police finally accepted help offered by British detectives to track down the girl.

      Little Madeleine hadn't been seen in months when two highly trained dogs were brought in to go over apartment 5A of the Mark Warner complex of Ocean Club Resort.

      It was where Gerry and Kate McCann - who are not under suspicion - were staying with their family.

      Spaniels Eddie and Keela travelled to Portugal with their handler Martin Grime, and were sent into 5A one at a time to see if they could smell anything.

      "When the dog indicates in the field, it will either be human decomposition or human blood," Martin tells the documentary makers.

      (Cont)

      Delete
    2. (Cont)

      "The human decomposition is very persistent, very pungent to the point where we've been able to locate, in blind searches, graves 40 years after the body has been removed and the body was only there for a short period of time.

      "With blood, crime scene investigators have been to the house and somebody has cleaned the blood up to the point you can no longer see it. That doesn't mean there isn't any there to find. It might drip through the gap and run round the back of the floorboard, but odour will still be coming through the gap in the floorboards and the dog will pick it up and respond to it."

      It means dogs could give an alert to possible scents from long before the McCanns stayed there.

      Eddie, who was trained to smell traces of human cadavers, was sent in first with Martin and ran through the whole apartment.

      "Eddie's behaviour changed the moment he came through the door of the apartment," investigative journalist Robbyn Swan tells the camera. "He became tense and aware.

      "The dog handler said Eddie didn't alert in any other situation except when he scented that which he was seeking: the scent of a human cadaver."

      Martin says: "He would work very well in large area searches, and his response to finding was to bark."

      Footage shows Eddie sniffing around the living room area before going into Kate and Gerry's bedroom, smelling the beds and following his nose to the wardrobe.

      That's where the dog turns around and barks urgently at his handler.

      Eddie also barked at a spot behind the blue sofa by the window, where heavy drapes were tied back.

      Keela the blood dog, who was trained to only alert when she signalled human blood, was then brought in separately to sniff apartment 5A.

      She too stopped dead at the same sofa area where Eddie had alerted, and indicated to her handler that she could smell blood.

      Days later, both dogs were brought to an underground car-park where a number of vehicles had been placed by police.

      The spaniels both alerted their handler when they were brought to a silver Renault Scenic - the same car Kate and Gerry had hired on holiday.

      The dogs indicated they signalled human blood and corpse odour inside the boot and on the outside of the driver's door.

      Eddie also alerted to Cuddle Cat, the stuffed animal beloved by Madeleine that Kate took everywhere after the girl went missing, and Keela signalled blood on some of Kate's clothes, which were forensically examined for DNA evidence.

      When asked about the dogs' results by Portuguese journalist Sandra Felgueira in 2009, Gerry said: "I can tell you that we've obviously looked at evidence about cadaver dogs and they're incredibly unreliable."

      Kate made similar remarks in her book Madeleine.

      Both parents were named as arguido - persons of interest - days after the dogs were brought in, but that status was lifted in 2008 when the case was archived by Portuguese police.

      *The Disappearance Of Madeleine McCann is on Netflix now

      Delete
    3. "The dog handler said Eddie didn't alert in any other situation except when he scented that which he was seeking: the scent of a human cadaver."

      Delete
    4. "When the dog indicates in the field, it will either be human decomposition or human blood," Martin tells the documentary makers.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous 31 May 2019, 12:22:00,

      “Spaniels Eddie and Keela travelled to Portugal with their handler Martin Grime, and were sent into 5A one at a time to see if they could smell anything.

      "When the dog indicates in the field, it will either be human decomposition or human blood," Martin tells the documentary makers.

      "The human decomposition is very persistent, very pungent to the point where we've been able to locate, in blind searches, graves 40 years after the body has been removed and the body was only there for a short period of time.

      "With blood, crime scene investigators have been to the house and somebody has cleaned the blood up to the point you can no longer see it. That doesn't mean there isn't any there to find. It might drip through the gap and run round the back of the floorboard, but odour will still be coming through the gap in the floorboards and the dog will pick it up and respond to it."

      *****

      You are desperate, aren’t you?

      Mark Perlin’s results are a hypothesis, Eddie’s alerts happened.

      Delete
  19. Desperate? That would be you. The article you've quoted shows quite clearly Martin Grime confirming Eddie alerted to dead body scent and blood. Why will you not just admit this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sigh...

      "Eddie, who was trained to smell traces of human cadavers, was sent in first with Martin and ran through the whole apartment.

      "Eddie's behaviour changed the moment he came through the door of the apartment," investigative journalist Robbyn Swan tells the camera. "He became tense and aware.

      "The dog handler said Eddie didn't alert in any other situation except when he scented that which he was seeking: the scent of a human cadaver.""

      Delete
  20. https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturnz/status/1134264959179919365
    ⚡Bugsy ⚡‏ @TheBunnyReturnz
    Replying to @TheBunnyReturnz @xxSiLverdoexx
    On the ss below, textusa rightly claims that Syn's work on the dogs was commendable and something they'd subscribe to. Well, textusa, get your readers on, apologise for your lies on this matter and perhaps consider removing them altogether:
    Read link 👇
    http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1rkfugp
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7239_bXUAA285p.jpg
    2:06 AM - 31 May 2019

    [Picture attached:
    “If you are referring to your co-blog author as having been Synonymph – who, even though she disagrees with us has done an excellent and very commendable work about the dogs, so we basically subscribe her opinions on the dogs – “]

    *****
    https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturnz/status/1134266738433056768
    ⚡Bugsy ⚡‏ @TheBunnyReturnz
    Replying to @TheBunnyReturnz @xxSiLverdoexx
    Syn was a friend of Martin Grime, and they discussed the dogs on many occasions, hence why she was regarded as *the* best source of information when it came to Eddie, Keela and indeed all of Martin's dogs. textusa really needs to accept they're wrong and stop peddling lies.
    2:13 AM - 31 May 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturnz/status/1134268790542426113
    ⚡Bugsy ⚡‏ @TheBunnyReturnz
    Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx
    She is :) So that's Syn, myself, NT, JBL, Jules, Sade, you, just about everyone who understands the files, Martin Grime + reports from other cases, all stating Eddie alerted to human blood and the target scent of VOCs given off by a dead body, and Keela human blood only.
    2:22 AM - 31 May 2019

    *****

    Mr Thompson,

    In the Twitlonger, Synonymph says:
    “It was within Eddie's repertoire to alert to DRIED blood from a live human as well as to alert to a cadaver or it's scent/odour.”

    Synonymph is clearly using as a baseline for her reasoning the translation made by the PJ from what Martin Grime said originally:
    http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_RIGATORY.htm

    “The dog EVRD is trained using whole and disintegrated material, blood, bone tissue, teeth, etc. and decomposed cross-contaminants. The dog will recognize all or parts of a human cadaver. He is not trained for 'live' human odours; no trained dog will recognize the smell of 'fresh blood'. They find, however, and give the alert for dried blood from a live human being.”

    If after having read this in Portuguese from the original PJ File page, we stated that we maintained our opinion, it is evident that we will keep maintaining it after reading something that is clearly based on that.

    So to be clear, we do NOT agree with Synonymph when she says “It was within Eddie's repertoire to alert to DRIED blood from a live human as well as to alert to a cadaver or it's scent/odour”.

    (Cont)

    ReplyDelete
  21. (Cont)

    After throwing Bohden under the bus, you now throw Synonymph, by implying she sides with you, and so ruining her credibility. We’re not accusing Syn of misinformation as she may have been mistaken about Eddie’s alert to the tissue in question as we believe she is a genuine defender of Martin Grime and his dogs.

    It must be said that this EVRD v blood from live human was not debated ever up until now, as no doubter ever questioned of whether Maddie’s body had not ever been in the Scenic before you did. If you are right, then please consider yourself a genius. If you were not the first to raise the question, you were the first we noticed doing but will obviously give the credit to where the credit is due.

    As a side-note, we find your support for Mark Perlin’s offer to be accepted very strange taking into account you knew this because if what you say is true, then any DNA matches in the Scenic are meaningless. Where have Mark S’ podcasts gone? We do hope that it’s dawning on Mark S what kind of people he decided to have around him in this project.

    Let’s continue to be clear, we have said repeatedly that we hold no sacred cows. We don’t follow gurus, we don’t subscribe to things because sacred cows have said them.

    If we agree with someone, it’s because we agree with what they said it and not because they said it. We said that we basically agreed with Synonymph. Now on better analysis, we disagree with that sentence. There may be others that on better analysis we may not agree with. If that happens, we will recognise that with pride. It’s called learning, it shows we evolve.

    We listen, we analyse we come to our own conclusions. So, when Martin Grime said “human blood scent” we listened to what he had to say. Then we gave the subject a thought, debated it between ourselves and came to our own conclusions about it. And we have started to explain our conclusions in this post and will continue to do so in the next.

    But we can say that the conclusion that we have come to is that Eddie’s alerts are an indisputable proof that a human cadaver was in the Scenic and if there’s a DNA match, the that body has to be Maddie. No ifs or buts about it. Eddie’s alerts are that damning for the McCanns.

    That’s how important this issue is, and how understandably you are in panic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You really do show yourself up. Syn spoke directly to Martin Grime about both Eddie and Keela. He told her exactly the same as he states in the files, that Eddie alerts to the scent of human blood and the target scent of a dead body.

      Eddie was trained as a human blood dog first, then as a cadaver dog, but hey, carry on destroying what's left of your credibility. Some will be conned by your lies, the majority though, see you for what you are - a con artist who is mentally unable to admit that appearing to be right is more important than actually being right.

      For the record, I have never said Madeleine's body wasn't in the boot, only that it's my opinion it wasn't. You on the other hand cannot budge from a flawed point of view yo7 claim is a stone wall fact.

      Further to that, you claimed no DNA could be retrieved from an alert only Eddie made. I suggest you read the files again because yet again, you are wrong.

      All this talk of gangs just makes you look unbalanced and paranoid. There is no gang, only a lot of people who can see you're wrong.

      Delete
    2. Mr Thompson,

      "Syn spoke directly to Martin Grime about both Eddie and Keela. He told her exactly the same as he states in the files, that Eddie alerts to the scent of human blood and the target scent of a dead body"

      So now you know what Martin Grime told Synonymph or you claim know exactly what she thought when she said what she said. You and your grandiose delusion of determining what people think and say. Hope she's enjoying the use you are giving of her name.

      "Eddie was trained as a human blood dog first, then as a cadaver dog".

      Quote/link please. Thank you.

      "Further to that, you claimed no DNA could be retrieved from an alert only Eddie made. I suggest you read the files again because yet again, you are wrong."

      Quote/link please. Thank you.

      Delete
    3. That's right. Syn and I are very good friends and I have her permission to say the very things she's said herself online. You're making a fool of yourself.

      Clue for you. Attracta Harron.

      Delete
    4. Mr Thompson,

      If you are quoting what she said it online, she doesn't need to give you permission to anything it's public.

      You are the one proving a point. Provide the links.

      Delete
    5. It's polite to ask, textusa. I wouldn't expect you to understand that.

      If you'd read the files and in particular any that relate to Martin Grime, you'd know exactly what I speak of. The reason I won't direct you to the exact quote, is that you need to read the files The relevant files in their entirety.

      Delete
    6. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

      Delete
    7. Oh, Mr Thompson, only noticed this now (just shows what it really matters): "I did try tell textusa that the quotes HE asked for were in the files". He?

      Are you sure you meant... he? Seriously?

      Delete
  22. https://twitter.com/Tealtraum/status/1134218305127047170
    Ben Salmon‏ @Tealtraum
    Been reading tag and two blogs closely over the last week or so. Just want to reaffirm publicly that my opinion has not changed, I believe body was moved in the hire car, early June. For many reasons. Doesn't make me anyone's enemy. #McCann
    11:01 PM - 30 May 2019

    Not Textusa31 May 2019 at 05:38
    For Tealtraum:

    Hi, saw your tweet - thanks for that. Shows it's perfectly possible for people to have a difference of opinion without carrying on like they crapped in your handbag.

    Very happy to explain what my thinking is on the whole ''body in the car'' scenario if you want to pop in at some point :)

    *****

    So, is now NotTextusa stalking tweets?

    And asking for things from Twitter to be discussed on a… blog???

    And here we were thinking that this was the most abhorrent thing one could do…

    (Does NotTextusa need a request to lay way his thoughts about the “whole “body in the car” scenario? He saw the tweet, saw that it contained matter for debate and/or clarification so shouldn’t he enlighten his readers without having Ben Salmon ask him?)

    ReplyDelete
  23. If Grime or Syn on his behalf admit that E’s alerts in the car and behind the sofa are possibly blood only, then it makes GA and the SCJ look foolish and Grime to have stood by and failed to clarify an assumption made by many that the Mcs put Ms body in the car.
    That leaves only the toy and the clothing not signalled by Keela, plus the closet.
    All could then be explained away as some sort of innocent contamination.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Are you saying Mr Grime trained Eddie to forget the scent of dried blood.. ?
    Eddie alerted to the key fob, with blood on it.. Why do you think Mr Grime removed the key fob from the car after Eddie alerted and placed it somewhere else..? Where both Eddie & Keela alerted to it..
    Why can't you just admit you're wrong like everyone else does when they get something wrong.. I've SS my comment before posting..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jules,

      "Are you saying Mr Grime trained Eddie to forget the scent of dried blood.. ?"

      No, we are not saying that at all. Eddie could not forget something he was not trained for.

      Delete
  25. So Eddie, a dog trained at great expense and with body parts that could only be legally used in USA alerts to blood from a living or dead person.
    What use would that be in a search for a body? How would the handler know if they were on a wild goose chase, following a scent of blood?
    Training a blood dog seems much easier as human blood products can be legally obtained for use in U.K.
    Why go to all the trouble to train Eddie in the USA if he was so unreliable in distinguishing blood from cadaver odour?
    But that’s not what Grime says in his summary.

    ReplyDelete
  26. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134476724861853697
    J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
    @TheBunnyReturnz I see you have just corrected Textusa most succinctly re Eddie & his alerts. There is also no proof or confirmation that a body was in the boot of the Scenic & only the foolhardy would insist there absolutely was. Like all things, we have to wait to see.
    4:08 PM - 31 May 2019

    ****
    https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134480909774872576
    J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
    What is being overlooked is that Eddie did not enter the Scenic or alert to the boot at all. He alerted to the driver door within which was found a key fob that Keela alerted to also. That fob was again alerted to by Eddie when buried in sand later, as did Keela. Blood. #Mccann
    4:25 PM - 31 May 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturnz/status/1134484095873032192
    ⚡Bugsy ⚡‏ @TheBunnyReturnz
    Replying to @JBLittlemore
    textusa wasn't even aware of that alert until a couple of weeks ago, now they claim to know more than those who have studied the dogs for years and more worryingly, they contradict Martin Grime and take a swipe at those who translated the files. Bizarre. #McCann
    4:37 PM - 31 May 2019

    *****

    And the gang is up in arms!

    Their panic is palpable.

    Mr Thompson had to come out of hiding. JBLittlemore, unprotects his account less than 24 hours after having protected. Of course, he’s their most valued member (in fact the only one) and he’s needed on the battleground! LOL.

    They are really, really, REALLY worried that we are getting our point across, aren't they? And we fully understand why.

    12 years on, the pros (us) are trying to convince people that a dead body was in the Scenic (as says Gonçalo Amaral and has the Portuguese justice system considered proven) while the antis (the gang) are trying to prove we are wrong!

    The Rat, very conveniently has gone silent about the dogs and tweets with pros about football, weather and knitting.

    Let us be very clear, we will write on our own rhythm. We decide when we publish and what we publish. And the next post will only come out when we decide it will, not before.

    So you huff and puff as much as you want against this brick house.

    To readers, please be prepared to read all we have said distorted and read many pre-emptive conclusions that they will say we have reached when we haven’t.

    It’s understandable, they are in PANIC.

    PS: You do realise you are building suspense for our next post, don't you? We can't thank you enough.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Serious typo "as says Gonçalo Amaral and has the Portuguese justice system considered proven" should be, obviously "as says Gonçalo Amaral and as the Portuguese justice system considered proven".

      Apologies.

      Delete
  27. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134489105809776640
    J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
    Replying to @TheBunnyReturnz
    It is all ridiculous. And doubting Syn?! All the nonsense about the Scenic - the blood on the key fob BOTH dogs alerted to in driver door was Gerry's. No alert to the boot by Eddie. So no indication/proof of a body there. Have to dash out but will be in touch shortly ; ) #Mccann
    4:57 PM - 31 May 2019

    *****

    Please throw the key fob out of the Maddie case.

    Careful, anyone who dares from now on to establish a link between the key fob and Maddie will be mercilessly clobbered by the gang.

    The rest of the gang agree with JBLittlemore?

    ReplyDelete
  28. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134484530461630464
    J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
    Replying to @TheBunnyReturnz
    Textusa clearly doesn't want to admit he was wrong & so will fight by any means to protect his unfounded theories to the death, destroying anyone who tries to help him 'get the facts right'. It is tragic. Any quality work they have done there is also destroyed as a result #Mccann
    4:39 PM - 31 May 2019

    *****

    We are destroying people? Who??

    How would a blog with only 4 readers and 2 Chinese bots destroy anyone???

    ReplyDelete
  29. Do readers remember us saying that the best way to win a game of chess was to play BOTH the white and black pieces?

    They infiltrated us for years, white pieces playing against the black one, the established pros. And they played and played until the white pieces earned an unquestionable credibility of anti. Solid, bona fide.

    Having controlled both sides of the board they slowly started to bully out those who were here for the truth. Anyone who dared not toe the line got pounced on by BOTH black and white pieces-

    Ruthlessly they contained the debate only to what was safe. To be more precise, they were very efficient in not allowing it to go anywhere it wasn’t supposed to go.

    And they bullied until only left were them, the fake whites and their friends, the pros, black as them.

    Once they had the board controlled, they started to say what the pros had been saying all along but now that it came from the mouth of antis they hoped to be convincing and drag the social media crowd with them. The lynch mob lynching the McCanns.

    If the need of the lynch mob for blood is satisfied, who cares about the truth?

    A lynching crowd. That’s what they were hoping to stir up. None better than any white supremacist racist lynching goon from the South of the US a hundred years ago. A century has passed and the world has not evolved in its values.

    But, quoting all Asterix books at their beginning “All Gaul is under Roman control, except for one small village in Armorica…” and we were the Armorica in the Maddie case.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asterix_the_Gaul

    But we are not “made invincible by a magic potion created periodically by the Druid Getafix”.

    We are normal citizens. And that was the objective to Textusa’s anonymity. To show how normal citizens can indeed fight back and we have. And we are VERY PROUD of what we have achieved. We don’t need prizes or glory only the sense of self-fulfilment, and that we have. A sentiment that also should be shared by all who had the courage to have accompanied and helped us in this journey. To them, all without exception, our recognition.

    Normal citizens can and do cause the NotFrog effect and this one caused by us AND our friends is hitting them hard. Really hard. So much so, irrelevant of what happens next, they have lost: they are swaying no one.

    That explains their anger, their fury.

    They started a HUGE campaign, with ALL possible means at their disposal, and we mean ALL possible. Even some we didn’t imagine possible. And the end result, a handful of losers who are finding it hard to come to terms on how they were able to lose so easily.

    And now they are reduced to being nasty fish-wives, showing at last their monsters within.

    Ironically, their movie characters are currently being rehashed in a movie opening this summer which we recommend for readers to go and watch and enjoy it like we will: the hyenas from Lion King. Watch them and throw back your head in laughter when one sees how well the gang has been replicated. To perfection, we would say.

    When the new Lion King opens this summer, do go and see it and then laugh, laugh and then laugh some more.

    It will be left to be known if in the Maddie case it will be the hyenas who will end (figuratively) with Scar or if it will be Scar who will throw (literally) the hyenas to the lions.

    ReplyDelete
  30. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134527788856332290
    J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
    @TheBunnyReturnz @Jules1602xx @SadeElishaa As you correctly stated Ben it is polite to ask before publishing Syn's info.. See attached she's sent me (plus much more!) with permission to use & let us hope this helps Textusa begin to understand how the dogs worked & why. #Mccann
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D76mjy2XkAI4S9v.png
    7:31 PM - 31 May 2019

    [Picture attached says the following:
    “Eddie was trained to detect blood first and later cadaver scent. Keela was only ever trained in minute blood detection. They worked in tandem as a failsafe. If both dogs alerted = blood. Eddie alerting alone = cadaver scent. Eddie would be sent in first. if he alerted Keela would be deployed to differentiate Eddie's alert between blood or cadaver scent. As Keela only alerted to blood. As Keela only alerted to blood, if she alerted then Eddie's alert was also attributed blood. Take the tissues used during sex found in HDLG for example. Op Rectangle report clearly states positive indication from EVRD and blood dog plus a visual confirmation from the scene of crime officer SOCO. Forensics later also confirmed blood and semen. The only time both dogs would alert to the presence of semen was if it was mixed with blood as it Was on the tissues. They were deconditioned to alert to semen on its own. I'll attach a screenshot. I know Martin because I was his brothers partner for 2 years.”]

    *****

    Interesting to see Synonymph providing JBLittlemore with material. That alone says more than whatever content of the picture.

    Second thing to notice, did the readers notice of when JBLittlemore was inactive, the gang went silent on the dogs? It’s very clear who is in charge of this campaign on the other side.

    The above does not match up with what Grime says in the Netflix documentary nor with what he says in the Mirror article nor, most importantly, says in the summary in the files. NOWHERE in the files, does Martin Grime say that Eddie + Keela = blood. If that were so, it would be MANDATORY for Grime to have mentioned that ALL alerts on the Scenic could be blood. He doesn’t.

    Instead, where it mattered, Martin Grime says ALL alerts from the EVRD dog are cadaver: “my professional opinion as regards to the EVRD'S alert indications is that it is suggestive that this is 'cadaver scent' contaminant”.

    Synonymph says “Eddie was trained to detect blood first and later cadaver scent”, we would like to see this backed up with some link.

    Someone with the proper qualifications has to tell us where is the logic on training a dog for 2 scents. Like training a dog for bombs and drugs. He alerts, is he alerting to a bomb or just cocaine? Bring in the bomb-squad to then discover that it was drugs?

    It makes no sense to train a dog for a scent and then train him for another completely different to be deployed in scenarios where the presence of BOTH scents are not only likely but highly probable and telling the difference between both is of the utmost importance.

    How does this fit with the above? It doesn’t. The summary is written by Martin Grime, the above is said by Synonymph.

    If this was true, wouldn’t he have said this in the Netflix documentary? A documentary heavily biased in favour of the McCanns and when such a statement would forever cast doubt on the alerts on the Scenic? Yet, he doesn’t. Are the Netflix documentary producers stupid? We don’t think so! Did they have the opportunity to cast doubt over the alerts on the Scenic on their 20 million dollar/pound/euro project but decided to put it off and wait until some bunny on Twitter decided ro do it? Seriously?

    The dog alerted for what he was trained for: cadaver scent. And in the Scenic, what a cadaver scent it was!

    (Cont)

    ReplyDelete
  31. (Cont)

    Something from a friend of a friend (especially from a friend of JBLittlemore) is very suspicious. Synonymph is basically calling Gonçalo Amaral and the Portuguese justice system stupid.

    We have been saying for years there was no BRT. Against all obstacles, obstructers and sacred cows.

    Readers who follow us will remember that about a year ago we were praising JBLittemore on his work on the dogs, when we tackled his phony-dog three-way debate with fictional Nick Townsend and Mr Thompson.

    Once we realised that he was nothing but a pretendy anti, we didn’t hesitate to publicly change our minds about him and said so on no unclear terms. A year has passed and readers can see if we were right or not.

    We stand by every word we have written, and we will continue on the path we have set to ourselves on this subject.

    Will that make us look ridiculous? No problem, don’t mind us and move on an let our 4 readers and 2 Chinese bots enjoy what we have to say. And haven’t we been looking ridiculous all these years because of the BRT? So, nothing changes.

    They and only they, can make up their minds if we are right on what we are saying, which is absolutely damning for the McCanns, or if we are wrong.

    Will our reputation be shot because we insist? Again, according to our critics it has been shot since September 2008, so nothing will change there. No, wait, it was since October 2008. The blog only started then in October 2008. But maybe before we started our critics were already saying that we had no street cred.

    And haven’t we been continuing without any reputation whatsoever all these years because of the BRT? So, nothing changes.

    Those thinking that by bringing Synonymph into the picture that would distract us or even maybe stop us, are wrong.

    To our readers, the stakes just got raised. The next post might take a little longer than we expected.

    ReplyDelete
  32. https://twitter.com/umweltbuerger/status/1134558971803705344
    Mari Welzel‏ @umweltbuerger
    Mari Welzel Retweeted Mari Welzel
    Can't wait for the next post, Textusa Sisters ! You said : "They are really, really, REALLY worried that we are getting our point across, aren't they? And we fully understand why." Wow ! #mccann
    Mari Welzel added,
    Mari Welzel @umweltbuerger
    Mind boggling stuff : #mccann and co "Ironically, their movie characters are currently being rehashed in a movie opening this summer which we recommend for readers to go and watch and enjoy it like we will..." https://twitter.com/umweltbuerger/status/1134553854773800960 …
    9:35 PM - 31 May 2019

    *****

    Thank you Mari!

    ReplyDelete
  33. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134602049562271745
    J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
    Vol. IX p. 2480 EVRD "'Eddie' The Enhanced Victim Recovery Dog (E.V.R.D.) will search for and locate human remains AND BODY FLUIDS INCLUDING BLOOD in any environment or terrain." Martin Grime statement. So, as Syn said ... fluids with blood in as per Jersey etc. #Mccann (my caps)
    12:26 AM - 1 Jun 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134603019490869249
    J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
    J B Littlemore Retweeted J B Littlemore
    And in the next sentence MG said "The initial training of the dog was conducted using human blood and still born decomposing piglets." #Mccann
    J B Littlemore added,
    https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134602049562271745
    12:30 AM - 1 Jun 2019

    *****

    Noted

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1135227944790609922
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      A great deal of arguing across the web about (the) Cadaver dog(s) also detecting dried blood. Question posed to Institute for Canine Forensics, CA, US. with answer attached. #Mccann
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D8EjkyoWwAIpmal.jpg
      5:53 PM - 2 Jun 2019

      *****

      [The picture attached is a screengrab from this site:
      http://www.k9forensic.org/faqs.htm

      “What are the qualities and skills of a HRD / Forensic Evidence Dog?

      The Human Remains Detection Dog is trained to alert on residual scent along with other faint scent sources like dried blood. The dog is taught not to disturb the crime scene by digging or retrieving evidence. An important skill the dog is taught is how to search homes or vehicles without causing harm to property. The dog is taught to discriminate between human and all other non-human items. The dogs usually work more slowly and more methodically.”

      JBLittlemore has highlighted the sentence: “along with other faint scent sources like dried blood”]

      *****

      Noted.

      Also noted the effort made to prove that Maddie’s body was never in the Scenic.

      Delete
  34. We would like to make it clear that we are not suggesting Synonymph has invented what was said in the Operation Rectangle report.

    We will have more to say on the Operation Rectangle and some questions to pose, which we will do in due time.

    ReplyDelete
  35. https://twitter.com/Jules1602xx/status/1134568795169861632
    00The Jules... 🕵️‍♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸‏ @Jules1602xx
    Replying to @JBLittlemore @TheBunnyReturnz @SadeElishaa
    It's almost as if he [Textusa] is dissing Mr Grime.. On the sly..
    Now he's [Textusa] saying Keela could have been mistaken.. Who does he think he [Textusa] is..?
    10:14 PM - 31 May 2019

    *****

    Jules,

    Please quote us where we have said Keela could have been mistaken.

    Thank you

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 29th May 21.26 you asked it as a question.. However, it was 'noted' what you did there..
      Nobody has said any alert was a mistake.. You just can't grasp what people are saying, or you don't fully understand the English language.. Or you're just being a total plum..

      Delete
    2. This is the comment Jules is referring to:

      “Textusa29 May 2019, 21:26:00
      Another question:

      An alert that is only given by Eddie, is it really cadaver scent or could it be blood that Keela failed, for whatever reason, to detect?”

      *****

      Jules,

      You are aware of the concept of a false negative, right?

      To say that Keela was mistaken, would be to say that she alerts to anything but blood.

      We have never said, never will say that Keela alerts to any other scent than the one produced by blood.

      Unlike you, we have never said, never will say, that Eddie alerts to any other scent than the one produced by cadaver compound.

      However, there are false negatives. Where the target-scent emitting substance is present but the dog, for various reasons, does not pick it up. That is not to be mistaken but a real possibility, in no way puts in question the dog’s reliability. Every single alert Keela gave was for blood and every single alert Eddie gave was for cadaver.

      Our question raises the possibility of there being blood in the bedroom which was not detected by Keela. For us, if there was any it will remain unfound. In practical terms, even if it existed, it’s evidence that simply doesn’t exist. It wasn’t alerted to, forensically it doesn’t exist. End of.

      For us, Eddie’s alarm is clear, it’s cadaver scent, in no way related to blood.

      But for those who say Eddie is trained for both scents, they can’t say just because Eddie alerted and Keela didn’t, that it’s cadaver scent.

      In their logic, one dog trained for blood (Eddie) and another dog trained for blood (Keela) didn’t. One cannot rule out the possibility that Keela produced a false positive because, according to you, one does not know to what Eddie has alerted to.

      To say that Eddie alerts to both cadaver and blood is to render ALL his alarms, with or without Keela, useless because no one knows exactly to what he’s alerting to.

      Are we dissing Grime on the sly? We will leave it for the readers to judge that. The same readers who will judge if you are dissing or not Eddie brazenly. Scandalously. Shamelessly.

      PS: Why haven’t you answered if you believe or not Maddie’s body was in the Scenic?

      PPS: Why haven’t you or any of others of the gang answered about what they think of the 15 markers?

      Delete
    3. Eddie alerts to the composite odour of the compounds produced in decomposition.. Eddie also alerts to dried blood.. That's why Mr Grime used Keela also..

      Eddie's stand alone alerts, in my opinion, were not to blood..
      Eddie could have been alerting to the both things he was trained to alert to in the hire car, but nothing on this earth will ever prove that, so you can argue it until the cows come home.. Unfortunately, you can't lift DNA from a smell..

      Delete
    4. Jules,

      You say “Eddie alerts to the composite odour of the compounds produced in decomposition.. Eddie also alerts to dried blood.. That's why Mr Grime used Keela also..” and we disagree and say that Eddie does NOT alert to the scent of dry blood, he ONLY, using your words, “alerts to the composite odour of the compounds produced in decomposition” which are absolutely correct.

      So you saying (our caps) “Eddie could have been alerting to the BOTH THINGS HE WAS TRAINED TO ALERT TO in the hire car, but nothing on this earth will ever prove that, so you can argue it until the cows come home..” is absolutely incorrect as we will show in our next post.

      You say “but nothing on this earth will ever prove that”, and we ask why don’t you believe that Mark Perlin’s offer will show a 100% DNA match? Oh, of course, to you if he’s able to prove that, it will be useless as it could be only blood from a live person.

      What idiots the Netflix people must be! Or, if they aren’t idiots, what idiots they must be feeling right now!

      No clear yes/no answer from you about body having been in the car but from your words it seems that you don’t believe it was ever there. Can we put you down as a no? We will take your silence as an agreement, and join you to Mr Thompson, JBLittlemore and NotTextusa.

      Now we’re only missing an answer to that question from Sade Anslow.

      Talking about cows. You do know that saying a million times that a cow is a horse won’t make the cow become a horse, right? It is said that telling a lie a thousand times it ends becoming the truth but not when it comes into transforming a cow into a horse. A cow will never be a horse. Not even if it’s the cow saying those million times that she’s a horse. She isn’t a horse, she’s a cow. She will always be a cow no matter how much she pretends or wants to pretend to be a horse.

      A cow is a cow, truth is the truth. That’s reality.

      Delete
    5. Why are you twisting my words.. ?
      Are you saying Perlins tests are that advanced that he can lift a full DNA match from a smell..?
      Perlin can only work with the forensics that were lifted at the time, from the boot and from behind the sofa.. Unless you know something nobody else does..

      Will any of this prove that swinging was being covered up..?

      Delete
    6. Jules,

      Please quote us where we have said that "Perlins tests are that advanced that he can lift a full DNA match from a smell".

      Thank you.

      Delete
    7. And to the swinging question, we will say the exact same words we said to Anonymous 2 Jun 2019, 12:43:00:

      O que é que tem o rabo a ver com a feira de Montemor??

      Delete
    8. Backtracking.. also using the SC proven facts to try & back up your nonsense..
      The forensics Perlin has to work with are...?
      Or do we (as always) have to wait for your next installment..?

      Delete
    9. Unpublished NotTextusa at 2 Jun 2019, 17:01:00,

      Trish? Is it Trish that’s a man? Is he one of the two gender-fake people on Justice for Madeleine FB group?

      Or is it Paul?

      Maybe it’s Kirstie. Or Ben. Or Netty. Or Natalie.

      When are you going to doxx them?

      And they must be loving the way you keep bringing the attention back to their gender-faking. With friends like you, who needs enemies?

      Delete
    10. Jules,

      No backtracking, diverting or distracting. What we are clearly saying is that IF Eddie's alerts in the Scenic can be blood, as you say they can, whatever Mark Perlin comes up with saying that he has a 100% scientific evidence that it was Maddie's DNA in that car, it's meaningless because it could have come from a live Maddie, before she disappeared.

      For those who say that Eddie alerts to both cadaver and blood, whatever Mark Perlin or anyone else with any other method has to say about the DNA collected in the Scenic is meaningless.

      We, on the other hand, don't say that Eddie alerts to blood. We agree with the PJS that it was proven a dead body was in that car.

      If Mark Perlin or or anyone else with any other method says that there is a DNA match in the Scenic, that would be pretty damning to the McCanns.

      Please tell us where we have backtracked.

      Thank you.

      Delete
    11. Jules,

      None of your business.

      To your "Or do we (as always) have to wait for your next installment..? ", yes, you will have to wait.

      But unlike you with your BRT pics and emails, we deliver.

      Delete
  36. If E was first trained in blood and then cadaver, what was K initially trained with.....pork chops??? She wouldn’t start with human blood would she?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Keela was trained on human blood only. All of this is in the files and has been for over a decade:

      http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_RIGATORY.htm

      'The dog that alerts to human blood is trained exclusively for this purpose, and includes its components, plasma, red cells, white cells and platelets. Given the nature of the training, the dog will not alert to urine, saliva, semen, sweat, nasal secretion, vaginal secretion or human skin unless these are mixed with blood.'

      Delete
    2. Mr Thompson,

      You do realise that "and has been for over a decade", gives you away, don't you?

      Nice to see you hawking over the blog the way you are :)

      Delete
  37. They can’t get to you, Textusa. Why? They have tried to expose you, to shut you up. It didn’t work. You’re batting off flies now.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Those suggesting that Eddie didn’t alert to cadaver at the hired car but ‘only’ to blood - (because Keela over-ruled her), got me thinking. Shouldn’t Keela be subject to the same scrutiny, the same backup? I mean, of course, another dog brought in to confirm if Keela alerted to blood, or not. Do you see what I’m getting at here? Imagine the line of dogs needed - stretching to infinity.

    Eddie’s alerts are scrutinized but Keela’s alerts are accepted as ‘fact.’

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, because all alerts have to be corroborated by forensics. Come on textusa, get rid of this blog you're not capable of answering any questions on the subject and your own words are incorrect. Take it down and start again...

      Delete
    2. Anonymous 2 Jun 2019, 10:30:00,

      Good point!

      Thank you!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous 2 Jun 2019, 12:43:00,

      O que é que tem o rabo a ver com a feira de Montemor??

      But since you insist in bringing up this unrelated topic, here it is:

      https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-CWZ1fz0MihI/VxYyZMV3gpI/AAAAAAAAC_Q/EjoFWjpHqmMepRXCvwwUlVskH2X6Y9BbQCKgB/s1600/TRL_Page_05.jpg

      In Portuguese:

      “2. Em 1ª instância, foi dada como provada a seguinte mat+eria factual:
      (…)
      6. Os cães da policia britânica “Eddie” e “Keela” detectaram marca de odores de sangue humano e de cadáver no apartamento 5-A do Ocean Club (al AR).
      7. Os cães da policia britânica “Eddie” e “Keela” detectaram marcas de odores de sangue humano e de cadáver num veículo automóvel alugado pelos AA. Kate MacCann e Gerald MacCann após o desaparecimento de Madeleine (al AS).”

      In English:

      “2. On 1st instance, it was given as proved the following factual matter:
      (…)
      6. The dogs of the British police “Eddie” and “Keela” detected marks of odour of human blood and of cadaver in the apartment 5-A of the Ocean Club (al AR).
      7. The dogs of the British police “Eddie” and “Keela” detected marks of odour of human blood and of cadaver in the automotive vehicle reanted by the AA. Kate MacCann and Gerald MacCann after the disappearance of Madeleine (al. AR).”

      That’s the Portuguese justice system to your “because all alerts have to be corroborated by forensics”. It has considered, without your forensics (we consider the dogs forensiv evidence and apparently so does the PJS) PROVEN that blood and cadaver odour was detected in the Scenic.

      A PROVEN fact that has gone uncontested all the way up to the Portuguese Supreme Justice Court.

      Your “get rid of this blog” and “Take it down and start again...” says so much. Thank you. There could not be better praise.

      Delete
    4. Keela's alerts need forensic corroboration but sometimes she may alert when there is insufficient material to take a sample or, as with the FSS, they couldn’t confirm what the cellular material was.
      How does the handler know it was blood? Is another blood dog needed for a second opinion?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous 2 Jun 2019, 16:54:00,

      The cellular material can come from other body fluids.

      Keela’s mission is to say if there’s blood and then it's up to human forensics to determine where that blood is located.

      In this process they may find other locations where there is blood but to which Keela did not signal (false negatives) or other biological evidence that is not blood and that Keela would never alert to.

      Delete
  39. Sorry but I must be missing something here with this latest revelation to conveniently to pop up now out of nowhere. It's all a game of Chinese whispers been played with a mans reputation and integrity, don't get me wrong I'm all for facts but personally I prefer them from the horses mouth and not hand me downs. As Martin Grimes has remained so silent about the Maddie case all down to political pressure then he's gone on to let his dogs do all the talking in over 200 cases. The fact that this little gem has been brought up now about Eddie only alerting to blood if Keela did has really got to take the biscuit. By their own words and admission they are double talking in leading people to believe Eddie alerted to blood if Keela did and could not be cavader scent, surely Eddie would have alerted in the boot if this was the case!!! The dissing of the dogs is really becoming a full time job because they really cannot change how well the dogs were trained and how high Grimes reputation has soared. Lets face it why would countries not only hire him and his dogs, but then go on to train dogs of their own in the same way to help skilfully help solve hard crimes and murders if the dogs were so unreliable? It just wouldn't happen no countries government/police force would waste time energy and money training for the dogs to be ridiculed and ignored in courts with the evidence they help provide. For people who claim to be on Madeleine's side they sure do go out of their way of trying to disprove anything that could help her get the truth out.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Did Grime display a bias by not deploying Keela inside any of the other 9 vehicles in the car-park line-up? Given that Eddie did not alert to the exterior boot area of the Scenic, from where the contentious forensic sample was recovered, what justification was there for the CSI dog Keela not checking the interior of other vehicles pertaining to various suspects?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Frog,

      No.

      Keela was deployed to the vehicles Eddie alerted to, which happened to only be the Scenic.

      If Eddie had alerted to any other, then Keela would have been deployed in them.

      No bias whatsoever.

      Delete
    2. Why did Keela have to be deployed after Eddie alerted..?

      Delete
    3. https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturnz/status/1134564617676611585
      ⚡Bugsy ⚡‏ @TheBunnyReturnz
      Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx @JBLittlemore
      Sorry, you've just reminded me of your last tweet before we called it a night, yesterday. Eddie wasn't deployed *in* the car. Once Keela had been deployed and alerted, there was no point as Eddie would've only alerted to the same areas. After Keela it's down to forensic teams.
      9:57 PM - 31 May 2019

      *****

      And this is the quality of people the other side insists on relying upon…

      Lets’ explain this like we would explain to Mr Thompson’s 8 yr old son of a friend of his:

      It’s like zeroing in on a target. Dog A picks a large target, then dog B picks a smaller target in dog’s A target and then humans come and pick even a smaller target in that smaller target! Isn’t that cool?

      Dog A goes in, alerts. Then dog B comes after dog A because dog B is more precise than dog A. After dog B, the CSI people come, you know those guys from the TV series? Those guys are more precise then dog B.

      To consider, even as a remote possibility, an Eddie – Keela – Eddie deployment (EVRD – blood – EVRD) is to be absolutely ignorant. Saying “once Keela had been deployed and alerted, there was no point as Eddie would've only alerted to the same areas” shows that ignorance.

      Delete
    4. Dog A didn't alert to the boot of the Scenic, so why was Dog B required to meticulously examine the boot interior?
      Hypothetically, if a living person had suffered a previous substantial blood loss inside one of the other nine vehicles in the line-up, is it your contention Eddie would not have alerted in the absence of actual cadaver odour?

      Delete
    5. Frog,

      Because for dog A, the inside of the Scenic is the target he has located. The entire inside. As Martin Grime says “This then produced an alert indication at the lower part of the driver’s door where the dog was biting and barking. I recognised this behaviour as the scent emitting from inside the vehicle through the seal of the around the door.”

      Eddie doesn’t point locations. That’s Keela’s role.

      The fact that Eddie was not deployed inside the Scenic is another proof that he is not a blood dog, because if he was one, he should have been and he wasn’t. Alerts to blood are localised, alerts to EVRD are not.

      “If a living person had suffered a previous substantial blood loss inside one of the other nine vehicles in the line-up” it is our “contention Eddie would not have alerted in the absence of actual cadaver odour”. Even if that car was parked on the left next to the Scenic. Eddie would go between the two cars and signal ONLY the Scenic, the way he did.

      Delete
  41. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1135254822037458945
    J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
    Eddie the EVRD only alerted to the driver door on the Scenic. He did not alert to the boot or elsewhere externally. Keela alerted to the door and also within the boot space. Are some suggesing Eddie's alert meant a body was in the door compartment with the key fob? #mccann
    7:40 PM - 2 Jun 2019

    *****


    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂


    There’s such an overabundance of desperation that would drive bonkers a despair dog from a mile away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1135255541314457601
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      The EVRD alerts that matter in reference to cadaver detection in a missing person case are those where the blood dog does NOT also alert - it is these that indicate the EVRD scents only what HE is trained to scent, rather than blood also, where the CSI dog alerts too. #mccann
      7:43 PM - 2 Jun 2019

      *****

      Is this what Silverdoe qualifies as… word salad?

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

      PS: To our readers, please don’t think we are laughing at an ignorant person. JBLittlemore knows exactly what he’s saying. He’s their most qualified man. He doesn’t bring absurdities like Roman/medieval/ancient burial grounds nor the most recent idiocy, the “the scented drawer liners theory” into the debate.

      The fact that he HAS to tweet, is very significant.

      Delete
    2. No, if you're so sure the body was in the boot, and that Eddie ONLY alerts to the target scent of a dead body, AND that you claim scent-pooling is a myth, then do tell us all why didn't Eddie alert to the rear lights or the boot seal?

      Or, you could just admit that you are way over your head with this topic and bow out.

      Delete
    3. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1135270250235289607
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      Replying to @SadeElishaa
      But the SC can confirm the dogs alerted, as no-one doubts they did. However without the corroboration required under criminal law there is no actual evidence to argue a case as Textusa argues exists. If it does, why hasn't it gone to court already in PT?
      8:41 PM - 2 Jun 2019

      *****

      Because no case can be built on just blood having been found and on the scent of an unknown cadaver also having been found. Both were proven to be found.

      You know that. The more you and your friends persist, the more you help us. Thank you.

      Delete
    4. Does the 'word salad' words bother you?
      And no. JBL Is more clearer than you ever will be in your ramblings. Are you missing me? My dazzling personality?
      Oh and cite please where it shows in the files or a video of Eddie alerting to inside the car, thank ye very muchly :) Silverdoe

      Delete
    5. Silverdoe,

      Please see our reply to Frog at 2 Jun 2019, 19:46:00.

      Delete
    6. Mr Thompson at 2 Jun 2019, 20:15:00,

      Because no scent was escaping through those seals.

      Please see our reply to Frog at 2 Jun 2019, 19:46:00.

      Delete
    7. I asked for a cite from the files please that states Eddie tested and alerted INSIDE the car? I can quite easily provide one where they were suggesting AFTER the initial inspection of the car where only Keela hit inside it, that they were going to try to test Eddie inside the car, but not one of him actually doing so.
      So, can you provide a cite from the files? Silverdoe

      Delete
    8. Silverdoe,

      “I asked for a cite from the files please that states Eddie tested and alerted INSIDE the car?”

      Yes you did, at “3 Jun 2019, 01:09:00”: “Oh and cite please where it shows in the files or a video of Eddie alerting to inside the car, thank ye very muchly :)”

      We hope that you’re not asking for it again after we said that Eddie was not deployed inside the car because there was no need for him to be. That would be a stupid thing to do.

      By all means provide your quote.

      PS:

      You said (our caps) “I can quite easily provide one WHERE THEY WERE SUGGESTING AFTER the initial inspection of the car where only Keela hit inside it, that they were going to try to test Eddie inside the car, but not one of him actually doing so.”

      Suggesting? Aren’t you SilverFACTDoe? The one who only deals with FACTS and only FACTS and nothing else but FACTS?

      Delete
    9. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1135272229363703810
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      No desperation in asking whether a child's body could fit in the glove/map/door compartment of a car - is such is to be believed.
      8:49 PM - 2 Jun 2019

      Delete
    10. No, what is stupid is claiming he alerted to cadaver in the car when he did not - And I'll show you mine, if you show me yours. I am always very happy to be proven wrong, unlike yourself, as you full well know. Please quit the attitude I'm being perfectly polite am I not? If there was no need for Eddie to be tested in the car, why would that have been suggested by Grime that they were going to do so? INSIDE the car? Do you by the way have a problem with the word, fact? I thought you were a truther yourself? Silverdoe

      Delete
    11. Silverdoe,

      Are you suggesting that, for whatever reason, Martin Grime felt that there was one tiny, faint, one-in-a-million reason to redeploy Eddie an the Scenic in the case with the highest profile possible and he didn't do it?

      You do realise that you are saying in very clear terms that you think Martin Grime was a very incompetent professional, don't you?

      Have no problem with the word FACT. The only fact in a suggestion is that something is being suggested, nothing else.

      Delete
    12. Actually no, I am not suggesting anything I am asking you where is the proof Eddie alerted inside the car whatsoever from the files - Not the car door where he did mark outside of, but inside the actual car itself. Why is that so difficult to find? And nice try btw - Anyone who knows me knows I stand by the dogs and Grime 100 per cent - Now, where's that proof of yours? I don't want your version of how you read the files, I want it in black and white that Eddie marked physically inside the car after the actual dog inspections. I have mine ready - Silverdoe

      Delete
    13. 😂

      You’re still asking for something we have said CLEARLY that did not happen?

      Has anyone asked you for anything?

      Your deluded sense of self-importance that you people have is amazing.

      It’s you who wants to prove a point, so it’s you who has to back it up. You don’t want to back it up, don’t. Up to you.

      Delete
    14. Lol me self importance? You're confusing the issue here as per like the wind up merchant you are focusing on a group of people you don't know and mocking tweets that are FACTUAL.
      I have no point to prove, unlike you....So....QUOTE:Textusa3 Jun 2019, 10:38:00
      Frog,

      Because for dog A, the inside of the Scenic is the target he has located. The entire inside. As Martin Grime says “This then produced an alert indication at the lower part of the driver’s door where the dog was biting and barking. I recognised this behaviour as the scent emitting from inside the vehicle through the seal of the around the door.”
      What did Marin say later?
      Where did Grime say the 'entire inside? When Eddie marked behind the sofa he pointed to a certain spot, same as the wardrobe, so, where did he say otherwise about it being 'entire inside?' Silverdoe

      Delete
    15. Silverdoe,

      The suspense is killing us. Not.

      Delete
    16. Censored comment from Mr Thompson,

      “Pseudo Nym has left a new comment on your post "Blood and the EVRD dog - Part 1":

      Oh, so the rear lights and the boot were sealed in airtight fashion, were they? I must say, that would be a first for any road vehicle, but you know best. (Censored, drivel).

      (Censored, twaddle).

      (Censored, tripe).

      Posted by Pseudo Nym to Textusa at 3 Jun 2019, 16:37:00”

      *****

      Mr Thompson apparently knows EXACTLY what were the sealing conditions of the rear lights and of the boot of the Scenic in 2007.

      Fascinating.

      Delete
    17. If the suspense isn't killing you, why mention it?
      No one here has 'dissed' the dogs. Evidence and facts have been twisted. The evidence and Grime's words should not be made to suit. When facts speak for themselves it's not needed. And if you don't want me to respond? Stop trying to stir between me, whom you purposely mention to get the reaction you crave, and my friends. Madeleine deserves much better than that. Without hard evidence, even Grime said himself, his dogs haven't been proven right YET. Stop mentioning me, stirring and twisting my words, I won't respond with FACTS you twist. Simple isn't it? Have a nice day. Shall I expect (Censored politeness?) and saying what you're doing here is wrong? It won't matter if I do, but it is nonetheless. When you have to put down others for now reason? That says more about you my friend, than I. You act like a god here. You're far from one. You're a blogger and no better than anyone I know. Others will eventually see it too. Have a good day. We're done. I will speak when it suits ME. Not you. Silverdoe.

      Delete
    18. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLmT-b2QybM

      Procissão
      Letra: António Lopes Ribeiro
      Intérprete: João Villaret

      Tocam os sinos da torre da igreja,
      Há rosmaninho e alecrim pelo chão.
      Na nossa aldeia que Deus a proteja!
      Vai passando a procissão.

      Mesmo na frente, marchando a compasso,
      De fardas novas, vem o solidó.
      Quando o regente lhe acena com o braço,
      Logo o trombone faz popó, popó.

      Olha os bombeiros, tão bem alinhados!
      Que se houver fogo vai tudo num fole.
      Trazem ao ombro brilhantes machados,
      E os capacetes rebrilham ao sol.

      Tocam os sinos na torre da igreja,
      Há rosmaninho e alecrim pelo chão.
      Na nossa aldeia que Deus a proteja!
      Vai passando a procissão.

      Olha os irmãos da nossa confraria!
      Muito solenes nas opas vermelhas!
      Ninguém supôs que nesta aldeia havia
      Tantos bigodes e tais sobrancelhas!

      Ai, que bonitos que vão os anjinhos!
      Com que cuidado os vestiram em casa!
      Um deles leva a coroa de espinhos.
      E o mais pequeno perdeu uma asa!

      Tocam os sinos na torre da igreja,
      Há rosmaninho e alecrim pelo chão.
      Na nossa aldeia que Deus a proteja!
      Vai passando a procissão.

      Pelas janelas, as mães e as filhas,
      As colchas ricas, formando troféu.
      E os lindos rostos, por trás das mantilhas,
      Parecem anjos que vieram do Céu!

      Com o calor, o Prior aflito.
      E o povo ajoelha ao passar o andor.
      Não há na aldeia nada mais bonito
      Que estes passeios de Nosso Senhor!

      Tocam os sinos na torre da igreja,
      Há rosmaninho e alecrim pelo chão.
      Na nossa aldeia que Deus a proteja!
      Já passou a procissão.

      Delete
    19. That's the best you have for a reply?
      Figures. Catchy song though I enjoyed it - Have a good day! Silverdoe :)

      Delete
    20. https://twitter.com/andyLUHGNW3427/status/1135889292696399872
      andy‏ @andyLUHGNW3427
      Replying to @SadeElishaa
      Who's this Textusa? Never heard of it? Is it a Mexican sauce of some sort? Spicy? Tangy?
      1:41 PM - 4 Jun 2019

      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1135923442820276224
      SheLLxx ©The Shelminator ㊙‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      Replying to @andyLUHGNW3427 @SadeElishaa
      A swinger blogger who has been blogging about the case for a decade I think? And still doesn't know about the dogs in the PJ files properly 😂😂
      3:57 PM - 4 Jun 2019

      *****

      According to Silverdoe, all those who support a paedo involvement in the Maddie case, are paedos.

      Delete
    21. A swinger Blogger was not calling you a swinger....
      You blog about swinging. Wow you're touchy! Silverdoe

      Delete
    22. "A swinger Blogger was not calling you a swinger...." is from the same school as "For the record, I have never said Madeleine's body wasn't in the boot, only that it's my opinion it wasn't"?

      By the way, the blog is not about swinging. It's about the truth around the death of a 4 yr old girl. Just in case you forgot.

      Delete
  42. https://twitter.com/NancyParks8/status/1135248019379458049
    Nancy Parks‏ @NancyParks8
    Replying to @andyLUHGNW3427 @Natalie01016290 and 48 others
    Then why haven't they built a rock solid case against the McCanns?
    7:13 PM - 2 Jun 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/Natalie01016290/status/1135249435653550081
    Natalie C‏ @Natalie01016290
    Replying to @NancyParks8 @andyLUHGNW3427 and 48 others
    Because they don't have one
    7:18 PM - 2 Jun 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/NancyParks8/status/1135251506586775553
    Nancy Parks‏ @NancyParks8
    Replying to @Natalie01016290 @andyLUHGNW3427 and 48 others
    And never will
    7:27 PM - 2 Jun 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1135259052005646336
    Ismail A Rat‏ @IsmailARat5
    Replying to @NancyParks8 @Natalie01016290 and 48 others
    Well, that’s the idea when you dispose of a body...
    If it resurfaces then you definitely did something wrong.
    7:57 PM - 2 Jun 2019

    *****

    How right the is Rat! The down side to this is that without a body, no body can be “accidentally found” somewhere near Luz which would allow for the parents to take all the blame.

    But the Rat and JBLittlemore are both on Twitter. Why don’t they engage with each other as they have totally opposing views on the EVRD dog.

    In fact, why are those who engage with the Rat selectively chosen?

    ReplyDelete
  43. Unpublished Mr Thompson (at now so many times we are not going to list them),

    You see that in one of your comments are trying to do better than the Frog did on the Proven/Unproven facts.

    Seriously? You? To the Frog? How funny.

    To that we have only this to say:

    https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1132449609513656321
    Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
    Replying to @TheBunnyReturnz @Jules1602xx @factsonly10x
    I see you've acquired Lord Blacksmith's smoking jacket. You have aspirations beyond your current Bunny status, aspirations which can never be fulfilled.
    Now, off you go, back to sleep & stop mithering over what you think I might say. :)
    1:53 AM - 26 May 2019

    *****

    Only idiots think a parrot speaks out own opinions.

    When you say your extremely worn out “I’ve repeatedly shown you…”, we doubt if, due to your proven extreme compulsion to lie, you are shamelessly lying (or as the Portuguese say, throwing clay to the wall and see if it sticks) or if it’s your delusional sense of self-importance that makes you believe that whenever you show a leaf clover people will believe that you have shown them an entire Amazon forest.

    Oh, and we see that you remain faithful to your impeccable use of psychological projection. It would be funny if it wasn’t sad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is NT’s latest take on the PROVEN facts:

      “The dogs alerted.
      The court found it a proven fact that the dogs alerted.
      The court did not circumvent the need for corroboration or declare an alert to be the equivalent of forensic evidence.
      The accuracy or otherwise of the dog alerts was not an issue for the court to decide as it was irrelevant to the proceedings before them”

      *****

      We remind readers that NotTextusa is so much versed in Portuguese law that he says there are unpublished PJ Files, some of which are in the UK.

      The same man, when the statute of limitations on the Maddie case was being discussed he said nothing. Zilch. Niente. Oh and to use his beloved Portuguese, nada, absolutamente nada, népias.

      We ask NoTextusa to please quote us where have we said the court circumvented anything.

      When a forensic lab says something is proved, a court may disregard it (defense may present valid arguments against said proof, and the judge may deem it not to be considered) but what a court determines to be proof, in the case forensic, it is proof, so it’s NOT an “equivalent of forensic evidence” but forensic evidence for all legal effects.

      Those who tried to circumvent were the McCanns. They tried to circumvent the discussion of fact by just clinging to the principle of presumption of innocence on which they based their damages claim, they didn’t claim libel.

      If libel was not on the table, then all what Gonçalo Amaral said could not be true but the court had to make sure it was not a lie.

      But the fact that the defendants did not cry libel, does not in any way mean that Amaral’s book could not be filled with lies. It would simply mean the plaintiffs decided to overlook that fact for whatever reason.

      If the book was based on lies, that would influence the assessment of damages caused. To establish the certainty that the book was not untruthful was an issue for the court to decide because it was relevant to the proceedings before them.

      The fact that the facts within a book are true, doesn’t mean conclusions made from them is true as it’s always a subjective opinion.

      It was an issue for the court to decide whether the statement made that the dogs had indeed found marks of blood and cadaver was true or not because it was relevant to the proceedings before them, and that is what the court did.

      A proven fact by the Portuguese justice system is a proven fact, a legally binding one.

      The court opened the window of opportunity for the McCanns to contest that proven fact, they didn’t. It stands.

      Delete
    2. By the way, even if it wasn’t in any way in context and absolutely logical to have been done as we have explained, even if the judge decided just to do it out of the blue, with no reason whatsoever, fact is that she did it, it was done.

      And if the if the judge had indeed just decided to just have done it out of the blue, with no reason whatsoever, then the McCann legal team had to call the judge out to that fact and contest. They didn’t.

      Not only have they accepted that the facts listed were proven but they also accepted that there was a reason for the Proven/Not Proven Facts list to have been made up and presented.

      Delete
  44. https://twitter.com/umweltbuerger/status/1135466127231016960
    Mari Welzel‏ @umweltbuerger
    Mari Welzel Retweeted Mari Welzel
    Hello Textusa Sisters ! Monday morning and the pipes are calling ! Hopefully this means truth and justice for Maddie #McCann and for all little children who suffer and die. #mccann
    Mari Welzel added,
    https://twitter.com/umweltbuerger/status/1135462786069405697
    9:39 AM - 3 Jun 2019

    *****

    Good morning, Mari

    Two thirds of the post, the meaty part and most complex bits, has been written and will now undergo the grinding process within team that always happens, to be corrected accordingly.

    To give you an example, the last version of the last post you read, the part 1 of the blood and the EVRD dog, had absolutely nothing to do with the first version that was written and can tell you that after a very heated debate, a rather large bit of the post was taken out before it was published.

    Still a third to go, which will then undergo same process. We work in own rhythm and will continue use our own processes, that’s who we are.

    We also have our personal lives and unlike some we are not paid keyboard warriors.

    So, apologies to disappoint but it will still take a while for this post to be published. The good news for you that we want to put it out as much as you seem to be wanting to read it.

    Hope you understand.

    ReplyDelete
  45. And to those questioning why Eddie was not deployed inside the Scenic, fresh off the oven:

    https://twitter.com/PollyGraph69/status/1135479184120307712
    Debbie Lee Perry‏ @PollyGraph69
    Replying to @Cerb32 @Ntown1976Nick and 28 others
    Eddie alerted to death scent all over #mccann s and apt 5a, thats good enough for me, it tells us Madeleine is dead and her parents are involved in the cover up of her death.
    10:31 AM - 3 Jun 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1135482162730479617
    Ismail A Rat‏ @IsmailARat5
    Replying to @PollyGraph69 @Cerb32 and 28 others
    An EVRD may well alert to an object or location within a given search area, if it is narrow enough, and alert once when several objects are contaminated. The dog is likely to react to where the scent is strongest and typically at that point human forensic officers take over.
    10:43 AM - 3 Jun 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1135482812121923586
    Ismail A Rat‏ @IsmailARat5
    Replying to @IsmailARat5 @PollyGraph69 and 29 others
    That does not rule out there being multiple objects or “spots” within that search field which might - if examined in isolation - produce additional alerts. However, as far as the dog is concerned he alerted. His focus will be where the strongest scent is. He doesn’t, in that
    10:46 AM - 3 Jun 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1135483317619429380
    Ismail A Rat‏ @IsmailARat5
    Replying to @IsmailARat5 @PollyGraph69 and 29 others
    sense, understand that he is needed to detect scent or not on each individual item in a search area, only that he needs to catch the scent where it is strongest.
    He also, it should be added, doesn’t know what the fuck a Cuddle Cat is or why it is there.
    Once the toy was
    10:48 AM - 3 Jun 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1135483860379152384
    Ismail A Rat‏ @IsmailARat5
    Replying to @IsmailARat5 @PollyGraph69 and 29 others
    separated from the field and turned into a discrete item for search, the dog alerted to a probably weaker scent of cadaver.
    Best guess would be that in the PJ theory narrative, the toy either had fleeting slight contact with a deceased child in comparison to the clothing
    10:50 AM - 3 Jun 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1135484424496340992
    Ismail A Rat‏ @IsmailARat5
    Replying to @IsmailARat5 @PollyGraph69 and 29 others
    indicated, was cleaned or scent-masked, or had no contact with the child and was contaminated by contact with the clothes or the wearer of the clothes, say for example a parent observed clutching the toy to her lap.
    There was no false positive.
    The test for cadaver contact is a
    10:52 AM - 3 Jun 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1135484721872494592
    Ismail A Rat‏ @IsmailARat5
    Replying to @IsmailARat5 @PollyGraph69 and 29 others
    cadaver detection dog.
    The tool was good, 100% effective, the deployment was sound, the investigation circumstantially supported their suspicions.
    10:53 AM - 3 Jun 2019

    *****

    JBLittlemore, Mr Thompson, let’s see you engage with this individual on the dogs. Come on!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Happy enough to wile the hours away pouring over this unread blog, but unwilling to engage with an individual on a platform where they and their allies are ever present.
      You can ask why not but i have the suspicion you suspect it would be purely rhetorical!

      Delete
    2. https://twitter.com/Esjabe1/status/1135824021923205120
      💙 єѕנαвє 💛‏ @Esjabe1
      Replying to @JBLittlemore @Ntown1976Nick and 48 others
      The dogs were unlicensed & uncertified at the time.
      9:22 AM - 4 Jun 2019

      *****
      https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1135825181786693633
      Ismail A Rat‏ @IsmailARat5
      Replying to @Esjabe1 @JBLittlemore and 48 others
      I’ll defer to the authority of the police force that had funded them, the professionals that contracted them, the investigation that deployed them, the handler that trained them, the many agencies that continued to use their services - before and after - over the word of a...
      9:26 AM - 4 Jun 2019

      *****
      https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1135838393206804487
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      J B Littlemore Retweeted Ismail A Rat
      Said as it should be said! #Mccann
      J B Littlemore added,
      https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1135825181786693633
      10:19 AM - 4 Jun 2019

      *****

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

      At least now JBLittlemore can’t say he doesn’t know the Rat is on Twitter…

      Delete

    3. Oh, a friend warned us that JBLittlemore had already interacted ONCE with the Rat in the past:

      https://twitter.com/Esjabe1/status/1134612665630957568
      💙 єѕנαвє 💛‏ @Esjabe1
      Replying to @Natalie01016290 @BourgeoisViews and 48 others
      They weren’t so successful at the Haut de La Garenne debacle & scandal. For 5 months they found & dug up non-human bones & the infamous coconut shell “skull piece”. The only teeth & bone fragments Eddie alerted to were decades older than the alleged crimes. 100s of FALSE ALERTS!
      1:08 AM - 1 Jun 2019

      *****
      https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1134612879334879232
      Ismail A Rat‏ @IsmailARat5
      Replying to @Esjabe1 @Natalie01016290 and 48 others
      Zero false alerts.
      Not one.
      1:09 AM - 1 Jun 2019

      *****
      https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1134613112844357632
      Ismail A Rat‏ @IsmailARat5
      Replying to @IsmailARat5 @Esjabe1 and 49 others
      And no one “dug up” a coconut shell at HDLG.
      Three expert witnesses agree.
      1:10 AM - 1 Jun 2019

      *****
      https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1134613497395011584
      Ismail A Rat‏ @IsmailARat5
      Replying to @IsmailARat5 @Esjabe1 and 49 others
      But then you trip yourself up...
      Because you admit the EVRD was exceedingly effective and found human remains even older than the focus period of the alleged offences.
      Bloody effective dog, that.
      1:11 AM - 1 Jun 2019

      *****
      https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1134614331398807552
      J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
      Replying to @IsmailARat5 @Esjabe1 and 48 others
      And touche!
      1:15 AM - 1 Jun 2019

      *****

      “Said as it should be said!” and “And touche!”. Could the bromance be more evident?

      Delete
  46. http://www.cadaverdog.net/maleah-davis-cadaver-dogs-barked-at-scent-of-decomposition-in-car-driven-by-derion-vince/

    Maleah Davis: Cadaver dogs barked at ‘scent of decomposition’ in car driven by Derion Vince

    admin May 12, 2019

    There is a “substantial likelihood” that the man who was watching 4-year-old Maleah Davis when she went missing will be charged with murder, according to court documents.

    Derion Vence, 26, was arrested Saturday and booked into the Harris County jail on suspicion of tampering with evidence — a human corpse, according to police, who have not provided information on whether or not Maleah is believed to be alive.

    In court documents dated Saturday, a Harris County assistant district attorney argued for Vence to be held on a bond of $1 million because “there is a substantial likelihood that additional charges may be forthcoming, including but not limited to the first-degree felony offense of murder.”
    Vence’s bond was set at $999,999, according to jail records.

    CNN reached out to Vence several times last week but did not hear back. It’s unclear if he has a lawyer.

    Additional court documents also reveal that police dogs alerted investigators to the “scent of decomposition” in the trunk of the car that Vence was driving when he said he, Maleah and his son were abducted.

    One week after Maleah was reported missing, public court documents detail the evidence compiled by investigators as they continue to search for her: Blood that matches DNA from her toothbrush. Surveillance footage that contradicts Vence’s story. A blue laundry basket. A gas can.


    Evidence contradicts Vence’s story

    Vence told investigators he had Maleah and his toddler son in tow when he was driving to the airport to pick up Maleah’s mother on May 4. At some point, he said, he pulled over to check whether a sound coming from his Nissan Altima was a flat tire.

    When he stopped, Vence said, several men in a pickup truck pulled up, knocked him out and abducted him, Maleah and his toddler son.

    When he woke up a day later, the boy was there but Maleah was gone, he said, according to Houston police. He said he walked to a nearby hospital, police said, where he received medical attention for injuries he said he sustained in the alleged abduction, and reported Maleah missing.

    Vence told police the car he was driving was stolen when he was abducted, but surveillance footage viewed by authorities shows Vence being dropped off at the hospital on May 5 in that same vehicle.

    The Altima was recovered Thursday in a shopping mall’s parking lot in Missouri City, Texas — about 5 miles from where Vence said he woke up.

    When authorities inspected the vehicle, they discovered a blue laundry basket along with a gas can, according to probable cause documents in Vence’s arrest.

    According to those documents, police also had two separate dogs trained to pick up the smell of cadavers walk around the Altima and other vehicles in the parking lot. Both dogs barked at the trunk of the Altima, the documents state, indicating the “scent of decomposition in the vehicle.”


    Blood evidence linked to Maleah

    In addition to the conflicting stories about his car, blood evidence obtained from the apartment Vence shares with Maleah’s mother is “consistent” with DNA taken from Maleah’s toothbrush, the documents state.

    Houston detectives found drops of blood in the hallway that led to the bathroom and on surfaces in the bathroom.

    Investigators discovered evidence of more blood by using a “chemical reagent” that reacts to the presence of blood that may not be visible to the eye, such as when a person has attempted to clean it up, the documents state.

    (Cont)

    ReplyDelete
  47. (Cont)

    Vence allegedly told investigators “that there should be no blood in the home and that no one was recently bleeding.”

    Testing subsequently linked the blood sample to Maleah.


    Surveillance footage shows Maleah never left apartment

    Investigators have also seen surveillance footage captured from the porch of an apartment next door to Vence’s, the affidavit said. In the footage, Vence is seen on May 3 leaving the apartment with a large blue laundry basket with a black trash bag inside.

    Vence returned a few minutes later, the documents say. He then walks back out of the apartment carrying cleaning supplies, including bleach.

    According to the affidavit, the camera never again captured Maleah leaving the apartment.

    Police refer to Vence as Maleah’s stepfather. A spokesman for the mother’s family told CNN the two were engaged but that has ended. Police previously had spelled his first name as “Darion.”

    His bail is set at $999,999, jail records show.

    Tampering with a human corpse is a second-degree felony in Texas. If convicted, he faces between two to 20 years in prison.

    He’s scheduled to appear in court Monday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maleah’s remains found:

      https://beta.washingtonpost.com/crime-law/2019/06/03/police-say-maleah-daviss-body-was-found-arkansas-year-old-had-been-missing-since-may/?outputType=amp

      Police say Maleah Davis’s body was found in Arkansas. The 4-year-old had been missing since early May.

      By Eli Rosenberg and Katie Mettler
      June 3, 2019 at 6:05 PM EDT

      The remains were found in a garbage bag off the side of a road in Fulton, Ark., on Friday, just a short drive from the state’s border with Texas.

      That morning, Quanell X, an activist in Houston, told reporters that a man he spoke to in jail had admitted to putting a girl’s body in a bag and then driving to that area.

      The man, Derion Vence, was the former partner of the girl’s mother, Brittany Bowens.

      On Monday, forensic authorities formally identified the child’s remains as those of Maleah Davis, Bowens’s daughter, who had reportedly been in Vence’s care while her mother was out of town.

      The Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences, which made the identification, told The Washington Post that it had yet to determine the cause and manner of the girl’s death.

      Maleah was reported missing in Houston in early May, and her story quickly drew wide attention in the city and beyond.

      Vence told police that he and Maleah and his 2-year-old son were abducted by three men as they were driving to the airport. He told investigators that he and the boy had been left on the side of the highway but that the girl was still missing, adding that he did not recall much of what happened because he had been knocked unconscious.

      The girl had significant health problems, including multiple brain surgeries, and had been ill in the days leading up to her disappearance, police had said.

      But about a week after her abduction, police arrested Vence, 27, and charged him with tampering with evidence after the smell of human remains was detected in his car, according to court documents cited by NBC News. Vence is being held in lieu of a $45,000 bond.

      Police said surveillance video showed that Vence’s silver Nissan, which he told police had been taken during the abduction, was used by somebody to drop Vence off at a hospital after the alleged abduction. They also said they found Maleah’s blood in Vence’s apartment.

      According to CNN, court affidavits say that investigators reviewed video footage, taken from a neighbor of Vence, that shows Maleah entering his apartment but not coming out. CNN reported that Vence was seen carrying a laundry basket with a trash bag inside as he left the apartment May 3.

      The discovery of Maleah’s body followed Quanell X’s disclosure.

      Quanell told local news outlets Friday that Vence, whom he had spoken to in jail, told him that the girl was dead and that her body had been dropped off by the side of a road in Arkansas near the state’s border with Texas.

      “Derion snapped,” Quanell told ABC13, telling the outlet that Vence told him he was overwhelmed by the effort of caring for Maleah and his other children.

      The Harris County District Attorney’s Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A spokesman told the Houston Chronicle that prosecutors were looking to file murder charges against Vence.

      Delete
  48. RIP
    Agustina Bessa-Luís (1922-2019)
    https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agustina_Bessa-Lu%C3%ADs

    https://www.publico.pt/2019/06/03/culturaipsilon/noticia/morreu-agustina-bessaluis-1875143
    https://www.dn.pt/cultura/interior/morre-agustina-a-escritora-que-marcou-a-nossa-literatura-10970785.html


    “Porque escrevo? Para incomodar o maior número de pessoas, com o máximo de inteligência”.

    “Why do I write? To bother the biggest number of people, with the maximum of intelligence”

    Descansa em paz.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Always find it interesting how fast the cockroaches come out in force to attack anything that challenges the hoax whether it be the dna samples the dogs,or even mention to dare say swinging. Yes we all know the usual spiel of it's not illegal so why would it demand such a huge operation to cover it up, unlike paedophilia which turns the majority of peoples stomachs, which was and has been pushed to the forefront of this case at every opportunity, it's basically been rammed down the public's throats if we want it or not. There's a number of hobbies that are not illegal but people take part or even pay others to take part with them. Prostitution used to be a dirty word and even though the stigma has been lifted somewhat unlike the Dutch who are open with their red light district it generally still remains hidden as if it's still shameful to visit and use them. Same could be said of other non conforming such as adult babies,sex slaves,just slaves,being and dressing as a dog, even those who loved to be pissed and shit on as it really turns them on. While all I have stated is perfectly legal among consenting adults free or paying you will find 99.9% of people will never mention even to close friends and family their personal hobbies, not just because of the shame or embarrassment but also not wanting to be a social outcast or even pariah. I've no doubt many of us have friends in their social circle who because they don't share the same hobbies and interest have no idea what they get up to in their private lives and rightly so why should they. The question should not be who is the cover up for not just why, it was definitely not for Kate and Gerry and it shows on her face as she knows they'll be thrown to the wolves when the times up. All those who dismiss, ridicule and full on attack swinging then a snippet of Payne's statement gives an insight to what what going on, I wonder how long it was before the Gaspar along with Yvonne Martin statement was thought of to remind him no more slip ups and label him as a child molester. Err so we played some tennis and you know we were having a good knock and then it was getting a bit late so err we,you know left the tennis courts,went back to our respective partners to get ready to go out,you know it was,it was, you know certainly after half past seven that we'd, you know we'd left the courts,perhaps even a bit later than that. Err when I got back err I think because Fiona had done a lot of babysitting and left me playing tennis she said well I'm gonna go for a very quick run. All those claiming to be truth finders and pro Madeleine that come out en mass to attack and ridicule anything that doesn't fit what you want the public to find out and believe need to take a long hard look at themselves. You have no honesty, integrity or respect, the richest to the poorest on the planet can have all these, but not you, you're all sell outs where thirty pieces of silver comes to mind, I pity your friends and families.

    ReplyDelete
  50. We inform our readers that Part 2 will be published tomorrow at 09.00 am.

    It won't be the last. There will be a Part 3 and hopefully the final part.

    ReplyDelete
  51. https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1135993247875162117
    J B Littlemore‏ @JBLittlemore
    Replying to @andyLUHGNW3427 @FragrantFrog and 48 others
    Frog is rather fascinating to debate with ; )
    8:34 PM - 4 Jun 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/andyLUHGNW3427/status/1135993688302280704
    andy‏ @andyLUHGNW3427
    Replying to @JBLittlemore @FragrantFrog and 48 others
    Until it starts wanting to know personal details. What I look like is of no concern to someone who hides behind a toad 😊
    8:36 PM - 4 Jun 2019

    *****
    https://twitter.com/SadeElishaa/status/1136000812059172864
    00Sade 🕵️‍♀️‏ @SadeElishaa
    Replying to @andyLUHGNW3427 @JBLittlemore and 48 others
    Who's wanting to know what you look like 😂 you're not getting stalked by textusa already are you?
    9:04 PM - 4 Jun 2019

    *****

    If hypocrisy was rewarded with money, some people would not need to be paid keyboard warriors.

    Sade Anslow has now returned to being admin on Justice and apparently is not minimally bothered about 2 of her co-admin being gender-fake people.

    Fascinating.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Textusa