By suggestion of our friend J, this week we have decided to make a post of the 28 questions that we put to Anon in our post “Very important concessions”.
They were addressed to Anon (please forgive the aggressiveness below but as you know, then we thought you were Insane) and he has replied. We now invite all the paedo-theory believers to answer them (we will not put into our usual italics as it constitutes the entire post):
“Textusa26 Feb 2018, 13:50:00
“Anon” 24 Feb 2018, 12:29:00,
We have withheld all your 3 comments because we intend to write a post about them. However, the questions we are going to put to you and would like to see you answer them are not the subject of said post, so we have decided to publish your comments.
You state with absolute certainty that all is “about establishment paedophilia”
No ifs or buts. Not even giving an opinion but stating a certainty. It is establishment paedophilia is what you say is the reason for the cover-up.
So, Maddie’s disappearance, according to you, had nothing to with that ridiculous human trafficking gang theory but with a cover-up by the “establishment paedophilia”.
As you know, we disagree with you but let’s entertain you.
We’ll start by correcting you.
As we said in our post “Nepio v Paedo” about, if the covering up of Maddie’s disappearance had to do with paedophilia, then one has to be specific and correct that say it was not about paedophilia but about nepiophilia (our caps):
http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2014/05/paedo-v-nepio.html
“Wikipedia has the following definition for paedophilia: “is used for individuals with a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children aged 13 or younger. NEPIOPHILIA (INFANTOPHILIA) IS PEDOPHILIA, BUT IS USED TO REFER TO A SEXUAL PREFERENCE FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS (AGES 0–3 OR THOSE UNDER AGE 5). Hebephilia is defined as individuals with a primary or exclusive sexual interest in 11-14 year old pubescents.”
Although nepiophilia is paedophilia, we would divide this disgusting pathology into 3 categories:
NEPIOPHILIA – AGES 0–5;
Paedophilia – ages 6 –10;
Hebephilia – ages 11 –14.”
According to you, Maddie was raped and killed by a NEPIOPHILE as she was only 4 yrs old.
So, it wasn’t “establishment paedophilia” but establishment nepiophilia or establishment infantophilia.
In our post “Red-card”, we saw that Nigel Nessling was sentenced because he had in his possession category A images of paedophilia, among other less serious.
http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2017/12/red-card.html
We remind you that category A images are those involving penetrative sexual activity and/or ones of children involving sexual activity with an animal or sadism with children. Heinous.
But Nigel Nessling had only possession of such heinous images. He has not been convicted of raping or killing any child below the age of 5.
So, according to YOUR scenario of nepiophilia/infantophilia under which Maddie would have been raped and killed, the nepiophile who did that to Maddie would be without a shadow of a doubt 100 times more disgusting than Nessling.
Let’s continue with facts.
Operation Task was name given to the operation through which the UK handled the Maddie case, so you are basically saying that it was an operation covering-up for the establishment nepiophilia/infantophilia.
Taking that into account, we have some questions we would like to ask you.
In the Operation Task debrief some entities are listed as being “represented on the Operation Task Gold Group”, so active participants in the cover-up:
Question #1
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in the HOME OFFICE do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #2
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in the FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE (FCO) do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #3
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in the CEOP do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #4
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in the NPIA do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #5
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in the METROPOLITAN POLICE SERVICE do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #6
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in the do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Operation Task also lists other entities has having given an “unprecedented level of response to this crime”, which we assume were active participants in the cover-up:
Question #7
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in the SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME AGENCY do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #8
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in the NATIONAL HI-TEC CRIME UNIT do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #9
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in the ANTI-KIDNAP AND EXTORTION UNIT do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #10
How many TELEPHONE ANALYSIS EXPERTS do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #11
How many MEDIA COMMUNICATION EXPERTS do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #12
We would like to know how many people who worked in the FORENSIC SCIENCE SERVICE (FSS) do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Then there are entities that Operation Task debrief says they were “were represented on the Operation Task Gold Group” but are NOT included in those that gave an “unprecedented level of response to this crime”, so we have to assume they are active participants in the cover-up as well:
Question #13
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in the LEICESTERSHIRE CONSTABULARY do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #14
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in the ACPO do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #15
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in the SIO do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Operation Task debrief says, without naming them, that “a large number of UK law enforcement agencies” that also gave an “unprecedented level of response to this crime”, so, again, part of that cover up.
Question #16
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in these “LARGE NUMBER OF UK LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES” do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Not named in the Operation Task debrief but it’s certain they are also involved in your cover-up:
Question #17
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in the BRITISH EMBASSY IN PORTUGAL do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #18
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in Nº10 do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Taking into account that for 11 years, the hoax has had unfaltering support of the British media, one must ask also the following 2 questions:
Question #19
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in the BRITISH WRITTEN MEDIA from the broadsheet (the Times, the Telegraph, the Financial Times, the Guardian and the Observer) to the tabloid (the Daily Mail, the Telegraph, the Express, the Sun, the Mirror and the Daily Star) do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #20
We would like to know how many people who worked and are now currently working in THE BRITISH TV MEDIA (BBC, Sky News, ITV and Channel 4) do you believe knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Then there are the questions that issues raised by our blog that must also be asked:
Question #21
Do you believe that the MANAGEMENT OF THE OCEAN CLUB who tampered with Booking sheets knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #22
Do you believe that the TAPAS STAFF who stated there were the Tapas dinners that never existed knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #23
Do you believe that the MARK WARNER CHILDCARE STAFF knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #24
Do you believe that the REMAINDER OF THE MARK WARNER STAFF knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #26
Do you believe that GUESTS, namely Wilkins, O’Donnell, Bullen, Balu, Berry and Carpenter knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #27
Do you believe that BRITISH IMMIGRANTS, namely like Robert and Jenny Murat, Fenn, Martin, Geraghty, Cooper, TS, Jones, the Ghoul blog author and Flack knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Question #28
Last question. When you are done answering the previous 27 questions (no need to be precise, a rough estimate will do) can you tell us what kind of a “gun” was put to the head of so many respectable and respected people that made them aid a nepiophile/infantophile 100 times more repugnant than Nigel Nessling who raped and killed Maddie McCann?
Thank you.”
https://twitter.com/TeddyShepherd/status/974398426484965382
ReplyDeleteTeddy @TeddyShepherd
Replying to @K9Truth
Well let's face it The UK Gov hasn't gone out on a limb, galvanised the forces that it did, blew £M12 in order to cover-up the supposed mutual interactional shagging of a bunch of unknown medics who could seemingly afford nothing better than out of season budget holiday #McCann
2:34 pm - 15 Mar 2018
https://twitter.com/TeddyShepherd/status/974406997939576832
Teddy @TeddyShepherd
Replying to @TeddyShepherd @K9Truth
Nor would said Gov go to such extraordinary lengths to cover up the accidental death of a child belonging to of any one these aforementioned insignificant parents. Ergo Madeleine #McCann met her fate in such unacceptable circumstances that the cops and Gov must evermore cover-up
3:08 pm - 15 Mar 2018
https://twitter.com/veniviedivici/status/974409323236425731
Laffin@Mirror again @veniviedivici
Replying to @TeddyShepherd @K9Truth
Overdose by dodgy medics !
3:17 pm - 15 Mar 2018
https://twitter.com/TeddyShepherd/status/974415371913572352
Teddy @TeddyShepherd
Replying to @veniviedivici @K9Truth
But that is still not enough reason reason for the immediate and overriding involvement of dot gov. Madeleine, IMO, was pimped out by her parents for sexual abuse to someone of high Gov status who killed the girl one way or another. #McCann
3:41 pm - 15 Mar 2018
*****
We think this is best replied by one of our readers who commented on our last week’s post:
“Anonymous15 Mar 2018, 22:54:00
What is so infuriating is the attitude that there would not be a cover-up of the swinging activities of a small group of people who were nobody special.
That’s very true- IF it was confined within that group. But what you are saying it’s precisely because the activities in PdL were not confined to that small group and that people of higher prestige were also involved.
As Natalie Rowe described, participants were initiated and blackballed if they failed to maintain the absolute discretion required from them.
Anonymous15 Mar 2018, 23:09:00
Textusa, I'm @22.54
Need to make clear Natalie was talking about the swingers’ groups she was familiar with and not the PdL set up”
Our reader was referring to this from our post “The paedo offensive”:
https://textusa.blogspot.pt/2018/03/the-paedo-offensive_2.html
“From Natalie Rowe’s book, “Whipping up a storm”, when she refers to her friend Stephen:
“…he was into swinging and took me with him to Paris, to a secret, exclusive and expensive club (the annual membership was several thousand pounds) called Cleopatra. Everyone seemed completely respectable, well-heeled and with reputable careers.... [skipping here explicit details].
Stephen also took me to an even more exclusive get-together in a huge chateau about 45 minutes outside Paris. We drove through huge electronic gates into expensive grounds. This swingers club was for judges, lawyers and politicians- nobody could be a member without being recommended by another member and then going through a thorough vetting by the club. Members, who were sworn to secrecy, could bring a guest but they had to take responsibility for the way they behaved. Anything against the rules and you were immediately black balled.””
https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/974420693961052160
ReplyDeleteCanine Truth @K9Truth
FollowFollow @K9Truth
More
Replying to @K9Truth @TeddyShepherd
My mistake, it was not Anna Guedes who used the term "paedo-nutter", but Textusa. Furthermore, I'm reliably informed that the term was not directed at me. #McCann
4:02 pm - 15 Mar 2018
https://twitter.com/TeddyShepherd/status/974426008169402368
Teddy @TeddyShepherd
FollowFollow @TeddyShepherd
More
Replying to @K9Truth
Come away from it, go back to what you are good at. Pump out the info and the links out Don't be distracted by the afflicted They will never send any message capable of worrying the establishment. It's the establishment we must constantly attack/remind to b effectual #McCann
4:23 pm - 15 Mar 2018
https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/974430252037492736
Canine Truth @K9Truth
Replying to @TeddyShepherd
I was just correcting my misrepresentation of Anna Guedes, but take your general point. #McCann
4:40 pm - 15 Mar 2018
Those pushing the paedophiles theory are either implying or stating Maddie was deliberately killed during or after such activity. That is something with which we strongly disagree.
ReplyDeleteStrong allegations like this, set against Mr Amaral’s carefully worded statements, where he makes no allegation of murder, do not, in our opinion, assist in the struggle to obtain a truthful conclusion to this case.
If these allegations are based on the Gaspars’ statements, then we would expect some response to the question we posed about how they got to be in the PJ Files and the continued contact between the Gaspars and the McCanns.
https://twitter.com/umweltbuerger/status/974548268842536960
ReplyDeleteMari Welzel @umweltbuerger
Textusa, they fell for it, is it myopia, they're blinded by 'a paedophile' because 'kate & gerry #mccann & co said so' Wow! more fans showed up, k&g hoax a success, come out of your hiding, TM your swinging lifestyle is fully accepted, the fans approve 'bleib fit, mach mit !' :)
12:29 am - 16 Mar 2018
Your naivety is astounding! Google Rotherham and Telford child grooming and rape and marvel at all the agencies who were complicit in these mass cover ups of children being groomed and raped.
ReplyDeleteYour not talking of one child though.
DeleteMarsha,
DeleteWe don’t need to google Rotherham or Telford cases to know about them as some of the team live in the U.K.
The cases are horrendous. Authorities ignored what was happening under their noses. Cover-ups did happen. The UK should be ashamed as a country for what has been allowed to happen.
It’s about child exploitation, abuse and rape by organised groups, but nothing to do with Maddie case.
But it’s not about abuse of toddlers, which is also horrendous.
We are certain you are, as you should be, genuinely appalled and would take severe measures against these men.
Who we condemn are those who exploit the rightful appallment that people like you feel, in a case where the child’s death has nothing to do with paedophilia, as we believe happened with Maddie.
There are many other children who die as the result of many other causes. And not only paedophilia justifies one wanting to hide what one feels may bring about severe implications to oneself if known publicly.
I'm not a paedo-theorist. Nor am I swinging-theorist. I'm a Goncalo Amaral-theorist! I believe he had everything worked out and that appears to be the only theory that the McCann and their team have desperately tried to shut down by all costs (and it's certainly cost them a lot financially to try and achieve that).
ReplyDeleteI'm a simple-theorist as well. A boring-theorist one could argue.
A
A,
DeleteSo striving for the truth, is not being a Goncalo Amaral-theorist?
Mr Amaral is a human being who under the circumstances went above and beyond but he was just a Portuguese detective with no idea who he was indeed facing.
Who managed to come through the courts, just in his thinking.
DeleteHi Textusa,I do not say you cannot forget what maybe has happened in Rotherham, South Yorkshire Police,Telford grooming gangs!
DeleteRT, Today,Brian Garrish had a former Metropolitan Police Officer who openly stated that senior ranking Officers turned a "Blind eye" to Social Care Home girls disappearing being Groomed by known Prostitutes to the Police!
Which Once again brings in,"Who can You Trust on child sex abuse scandal" The Police!? When the people who are paid to protect Society(Police),are openly flouting child abuse to happen to children,who have for years allowed cohorts to escape the rule of Law for elite friends to abuse them?
South Yorkshire Police had the Audacity to claim that"Grooming gangs" were abusing 1400 young girls and they had No Knowledge of these actions taking place,pull the other one its got Bells and whistles on?
They also tell the public they had no knowledge of Jimmy Saville and numerous MP's/Lords with proclivities to Young Boys,they caught but were told to let go free by MI5/6 Officers!?
If David Cameron can suddenly add another 50 yrs to Lord Dennings Official papers"Profumo Affair" now 2064 date,everything is possible and probable.
I ask people to remember the term,"Smiling Assassins"often seen with young children as part of their collective to Office,Remember your time at Central TV Dave,the Cook report!
I'd like to think that 'most' are striving for the truth, T. (sadly there are a lot about who want to obfuscate the truth) Until everything comes out in the open, and I believe one day that'll happen, then nobody from their armchair really knows exactly what went on! And that includes you.
DeleteAs I said, the theory put forward by Goncalo in his book based on the evidence he saw (and he saw a lot more than you, I & everyone else), suggests by the McCann team reaction to it, that it was pretty much bang on the money! If he was way off the mark then that would've suited them just fine and probably would've left him be as a 'conspiracy nut', like they leave Richard Hall alone.
The fact that they went after him with everything they had tells me that he was very much close to the truth!
Sorry about that.
A
A,
DeletePlease do not sanctify the man. He was a human being and not a super-human able to see all. To sanctify him is to be very unfair to the man.
Yes, there were things that he saw and we didn’t but there are many things he didn’t see because he was unable to see them.
He was an investigator being intentionally cluttered by an entire nation. To demand that under those circumstance that he be able to see things clearly is absolutely unfair.
He was a Portuguese investigator and didn’t know what he was really up against. And all his judgements were made being ignorant in that.
His word is not gospel, neither is his book. We, for example have pointed that his thesis is unfeasible. The time needed to develop the cadaver scent simply does not fit with it. Maddie died sooner than Mr Amaral defends in his book.
By pointing out his mistakes – which were made under extreme adverse conditions set up against him – one is not minimising his value. One is just recognising his humanity.
Under the circumstances, Mr Amaral was an extraordinary human being filled with integrity and sense of duty.
He and his men are to be highly commended in every aspect of the investigation he coordinated and they executed.
But he has made mistakes and had misconceptions about things that appeared to be simple (example, the Tapas dinners) but we don’t blame him for not seeing their complexity. He was surrounded by very efficient people making sure that he only saw what he should.
They went after him because his book symbolised their unpunished crime and to pass on the image of innocent parents they were forced to take him to court. With the legal technicality of pointing towards damage instead of libel.
Not because he was close to the truth but because their version of events was so flimsy that anything touching it would make it fall apart.
We are not exactly sure for what you are apologising.
So, Maddie McCann was ‘pimped out’ by her parents to some high ranking abuser who (we assume) also killed her? And no one saw anything or said anything. Or they did and and have been covering up ever since... ? And this person likes to ridicule your blog?? The mind boggles.
ReplyDeleteK9 and Teddy have been exposed. Those wishing to continue supporting them have their reasons and don't mind being shameless
DeleteAnonymous 16 Mar 2018, 16:39:00
DeletePlease understand that they are now addressing the people who don’t read us.
It’s clear to all they have dodged the questions and have no intention of doing so and yet persist in pushing the paedo files.
People who have been intoxicated against us, don’t know better and are the ones continuing to be targeted.
"...we thought you were Insane..."
ReplyDeleteSymptomatic of Textusa's embarrassingly laughable approach, jumping to conclusions based on misunderstandings, misconceptions and just plain ignorance, which is why this whole blog is a load of rubbish, only worth an occasional glance, for the purpose of amusement, to see what blind alley she has gone down each time!
Don’t be a naughty boy, Insane. Quote the entire sentence please “They were addressed to Anon (please forgive the aggressiveness below but as you know, then we thought you were Insane) and he has replied.”
DeleteIt’s important that you quote all because there seems to be a person who disagrees with you:
In our post “The paedo offensive”:
http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2018/03/the-paedo-offensive_2.html
“Anon6 Mar 2018, 09:40:00
Keep trying to find the truth Textusa. It all makes sense to me that they would would be trying to divert the truth, and what better way than to push a theory contrary to the truth. Hopefully people will see what you see clearly and the truth will out. Thank you for helping me make sense of it all. I’m sure the paedo element is there in the background, but not directly involved with Maddie or her disappearance.
It’s good to see you stand up to your mistakes and admit when you are wrong. I for one respect that greatly.
In our post “Why?”:
http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2018/03/why.html
“Anon15 Mar 2018, 16:02:00
Its plain to see the “ugly seed” was sown right at the start. It has been growing since, with plenty of “evidence” following it closely. It’s what is hidden or denied and that which is kept from growing, this is where the answers lie, always hidden. Is it any wonder it’s shot down if it ever appears! Yet the ugly seed is fed and is allowed to grow and grow.
Textuas, keep watering and nurturing the seed of truth, you are the only one doing so.”
Now, go back to your owners and tell them that you’ve earned a biscuit. Even though you did misbehave a little by not quoting the full sentence, you didn’t swear and that saved us the time we would waste censoring you.
https://twitter.com/CaroleShooter/status/974577363261501440
ReplyDeleteInEz ShOoTa! @CaroleShooter
Replying to @2for1Tickets
Got a feeling the Text USA 'ladies' are a tad young and naive. Students maybe. #mccann
2:25 am - 16 Mar 2018
https://twitter.com/CaroleShooter/status/974631646623346688
InEz ShOoTa! @CaroleShooter
Replying to @SadeElisha86 @2for1Tickets
Some people are forever students.
6:01 am - 16 Mar 2018
InEz ShOoTa! @CaroleShooter
Replying to @SadeElisha86 @2for1Tickets
I accept TextUSA has theories like everyone else but the self indulgent writing is not a good way to convey those theories imo. Students should have learned this after 10 yrs!
6:09 am - 16 Mar 2018
******
Bless Inez for believing we are naive, young students. We would be naive indeed, considering the blog has existed since 2008.
We sincerely don’t believe she’s a shill, just someone who believes passionately in what she believes in.
No shill would make the mistake of describing us as young students, flattering as it is
As our readers know, the blog does not wish to be in any way political. On the other hand, it has stated clearly that the Maddie case is 100% political. It is, was and will always be, even after it’s closed.
ReplyDeleteWe have shown how in our opinion it has been affected by Brexit, without passing any sort of judgment about the process outside saying that both sides of that fence agree that hard times are coming.
It’s quite difficult to talk about politics without being political but when a political event happens in which we see the Maddie case influence it or be influenced by it, we must talk about it.
The UK is currently going through a political crisis due to the poisoning of Mr Skripal, his daughter and a police officer. All 3 are fighting for their lives.
The UK Government has said in parliament that the British intelligence services have evidence that all was Russian doing. We won’t say if we agree with this or not as that would be political.
What we want to highlight in this – and later link it to Maddie – is the FACT that the UK Government has stated in the parliament that the nation’s intelligence community has told it something and there are many who are doubting whether it’s true.
Again, we repeat, we are not saying that it’s not true or that it is, just stating the fact that many are doubting the veracity of what their government is telling them about an issue that involves national security.
On the basis of this this distrust there seems to be the dossier from Tony Blair’s time which was the proof that Iraq had WMDs was spiked and so that the participation of the UK in the 2nd Iraq war would be justified.
As we all know, no WMDs were found in Iraq. Because of this the British intelligence suffered a severe blow to its credibility that is now clearly showing its effects.
Note, the public do not distrust their intelligence services. They mistrust their own government. To them the government order a falsehood to serve its purposes from these services and they comply.
But is it only the Iraq Blair dossier that is making the British public so sceptical about the veracity of the information that the government is alleging to have been told by the national intelligence?
We suggest not.
We would point 3 other cases that are strongly influencing the public’s negative trust on its intelligence services, or to be more specific, its apparent malleability to the government’s will.
All 3 are non-political to the eyes of the common citizen and none implicate any threat to national security. They are: Savile, Hillsborough and Maddie McCann.
In these 3 cases, the public is aware that the highest authorities of the nation covered-up the wrongdoing in them. A wrongdoing that was evident to all or some. In the 3 those authorities lied blatantly.
These 3 cases show very clearly that in the UK an OFFICIAL version of things is not necessarily true, in fact they show that it’s most likely for it to be a lie.
In these 3 cases the various pillars of the British society have forfeited their independence by shamelessly forging and twisting fact to protect those involved.
So, with the “Skripal crisis” Britain is currently going through a “cry wolf” period.
Now that there is a wolf – be it Russia or not – out there, the British government wants the public to believe in it but after crying fake wolf during Savile, during the Iraq WMDs, during Hillsborough and during Maddie McCann, – it’s finding itself shouting alone and hearing from the public, or at least a significant part of it, no, we’re not falling for it again.
The government wants to be believed in and a significant part of the British public doesn’t. One of the reasons is the shameless and sick way the Maddie case has been OFFICIALLY handled.
This comment is not meant to be political, it’s simply to show how the Maddie case has damaged internally so much the UK.
The constant lies and refusal of anyone to accept responsibility which goes across parties has come back to bite them on the arse. Even after enquiries it's always the same old same old they never apologise for mistakes(on purpose or not) we get the lessons have been learnt speech and little else.They believe breaking the law is OK as long as it's them that's doing it so people have got politician fatigue, which stems from most just been career politicians who have done nothing outside in the real world. Without the old boys network they'd get nowhere in neither and that's the truth a lot have opened their eyes up to since Blair ignored us and took us to war.
DeleteIdentified "do not publish" reader at 16 Mar 2018, 23:08:00,
ReplyDeleteInteresting. Thank you.
The Portugal Resident article is back online
ReplyDeletehttp://portugalresident.com/attorney-general-receives-“new-theory”-in-disappearance-of-madeleine-mccann
Posted by PORTUGALPRESS on March 17, 2018
Attorney General receives “new theory” in disappearance of Madeleine McCann
A team of independent investigators working over the last decade has come up with what it believes may have happened to Madeleine McCann.
It is independent of the official story. It doesn’t work to the accepted timeline and it doesn’t involve gypsies, blundering burglars, or Eastern European child smugglers.
Says a member of the investigating group, the theory has been run past professionals from all walks of life, time and again.
The team are convinced that this now needs to be seriously considered by the investigative authorities.
They have communicated their findings to British prime minister Theresa May, and the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick (click here), but the six-page letter laying out what they believe to be “credible evidence” appears to have changed nothing (although it was purportedly forwarded to the Grange ‘investigation team’).
A new letter, translated into Portuguese - containing all the research, and the “detailed file of evidence” on which it has relied - has now been sent to the Portuguese Attorney General as well as newspaper and website journalists in this country.
Said our source: “It is a question of hoping one of them will have the courage to undertake what no-one seems willing to conduct in the UK: a serious investigation into what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann”.
This development comes just as the British Home Office is considering yet another request for funding of the Met’s long-running Operation Grange investigation.
Grange was opened in 2011 and has so far spent over £11 million investigating Madeleine’s disappearance against a backdrop of criticism, particularly over social media (click here).
As the Madeleine McCann Research Group waits to hear what develops from the 20-page letter - sent from the UK on March 6 and logged as received by the Attorney General’s office on March 12 - a leading member of the group said: “it is important that people follow this logically, and without preconceptions - however shocking the conclusion may seem”.
natasha.donn@algarveresident.com
Please note that this has nothing to do with the official investigations.
DeleteAs it says in the article it’s from "A team of independent investigators working over the last decade has come up with what it believes may have happened to Madeleine McCann."
We don't know what they have sent, how accurate and reliable it is (and not saying it is or that it isn't) but please take into account that for it to result in something, it is necessary for the British prime minister Theresa May, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick, the Portuguese Attorney General or the newspaper and website journalists in Portugal, to “one of them will have the courage to undertake what no-one seems willing to conduct in the UK: a serious investigation into what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann”.
As we know, this article was pulled off on the reasons that a major paper intended to publish it. Natasha Donn said that if they didn’t she would publish it again.
She has kept her word, taking some details out of the original article.
But the bad news is that if she had to keep her word, then at least “the newspaper and website journalists in Portugal have not, apparently, yet found “the courage” needed.
For comparison:
Delete"http://portugalresident.com/attorney-general-receives-%E2%80%9Cnew-theory%E2%80%9D-in-disappearance-of-madeleine-mccann
Attorney General receives “new theory” in disappearance of Madeleine McCann
A team of independent investigators working over the last decade has come up with what it believes happened to Madeleine McCann.
Just as the British Home Office is reported to be considering a new request by Metropolitan Police for the funding of its long-running Operation Grange investigation, the theory has landed on the desk of Portugal’s Attorney General.
It is explosive, it does not work to the accepted timeline, and it does not involve Portuguese gypsies or Eastern European child smugglers.
The objective of the 20-page letter, translated into Portuguese, is to prompt judicial authorities towards a reinvestigation.
Explains one the group’s principal spokespeople - a retired Nottinghamshire police superintendent - “it is important that people follow this logically, and without preconceptions, however shocking the conclusion may seem”.
“There is strong evidence, for example, that the famous Pool Photo was not taken on Thursday 3rd as was claimed.
“Weather reports, personal diaries, and many hundreds of photos on sites such as Flickr show that Thursday lunchtime was overcast and there was a cold Force 4 wind”.
The retired police officer is convinced that the mystery is “a very simple sad story” that for reasons unclear has been hopelessly muddled up.
As to why this may be the case, his response was a prememptory: “No Comment”.
“Any answers I give at this point would be personal opinions not based on facts or knowledge and therefore best avoided”, he said.
“It might be, after all, that the findings have "got through" and that a final answer is just around the corner.
“The last FOI (Freedom of Information) report from Grange stated there had been flights to Portugal in 2017:
“To date there have been 2 return flights to Portugal this year.
“In March three officers flew to Portugal at a total cost of £750 - whilst in May 2 officers flew to Portugal, costs being £500.
“To do WHAT ?
“How many of these had we heard about ?
“And don't forget that the CPS lawyers visited Portugal to speak to counterparts a couple of years ago . . .”
Thus for now, the team that calls itself the Madeleine McCann Research group waits.
The letter was sent on March 6 and has been tracked as having reached its destination.
Said one of the group’s members: “We can only hope the authorities take notice. If our findings get published in the Portuguese media, the authorities might be obliged to make an official statement and it might get reported in the UK.
“And then things finally might be able to move forwards…”
natasha.donn@algarveresident.com"
Now having read what is behind this article we inform our readers that:
DeleteWe stand FULLY by what we said in our “Sagresman” post but don’t want to be associated IN ANY WAY with death before May 3rd theory.
http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2015/10/sagresman.html
We stand FULLY by what we said in our “Non-post” post, that the pool photo IS PHOTOSHOPED, a composite of 3 pictures:
#1 - of Maddie alone sitting by the Tapas pool,
#2 - of Gerry & Amelie on later date sitting near where Maddie had been photographed in #1;
#3 - of Gerry, from which only the sunglasses were 'extracted', from hanging on Gerry's t-shirt, to where they appear on his face).
http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2015/11/non-post.html
What's their game really do you think, Textusa?
DeleteAnonymous 17 Mar 2018, 17:42:00
DeleteSorry, but we prefer not to comment publicly what their game is. We have come to a conclusion which we will be keeping to ourselves for now.
But we can say that sometimes we are curious about what is behind a door with an opaque glass pane. Other times we have no curiosity at all at what is behind such a door.
But even in the last case, where there’s no curiosity, if the opaque pane is changed to a transparent one, one has to see what is behind it.
And on seeing what is behind it, there is information one can see that before one could not.
And may even regret not having had curiosity about that door before, such was enlightening what one now has seen.
In practical terms, one has been clarified, without even having asked for clarification.
What one sees may be something profoundly unpleasant but that doesn’t in any way invalidate what is said above.
This episode, was one such door.
If we liked what we saw, or not we will keep to ourselves but we can say with certainty that it was surprisingly revealing. Very, very revealing.
If CMMOMM can't stop the investigation into what happened to Madeleine McCann, then they sure as hell want to try and scupper the investigation.
DeleteYou don't have to be Einstein, anon 17:42, to work out what their game is all about.
I would be very interested to read about your conclusion on this whole CMoMM / MMRG stuff is about, Textusa? As I'm sure all your readers would be as well.
DeleteJudging by your cryptic comment in regards to it, then I feel that you also believe that what they are doing is nothing to do with trying to find the truth about what really happened to Madeleine McCann.
Anonymous 18 Mar 2018, 15:50:00,
DeleteWe have obviously discussed the article between ourselves. In terms of content and in terms of importance within the “Maddie case game”.
In terms of content we can say the following:
- Who are the Portuguese people involved in this? Who were the Portuguese researchers? Was Paulo Reis a translator or a researcher? Why is this not clear?
- Why not quote the names of all the researchers involved? That is what gives credibility to a thesis.
- There is no suggestion whatsoever in this article that Robert Murat is involved in any way. As far as we could tell, the man has been a “favourite” of that forum to bear most of the guilt in this case, to the point of defaming Gemma O’Doherty because she brought back the truthfulness of the Smith sighting. Where has Murat gone to?
- Their evidence to back up what they say is completely lacking. They don’t give examples of who said they saw Maddie and later in the week and why these statements are questionable – they just make a claim. We find interesting it that they give high credibility to a person whose daily routine involves her seeing many clients during the day, remembers many days later, exactly on which day she saw Maddie, according to the defenders of this thesis, because of the tennis shoes she was wearing – which means she was allegedly paying much more attention to the shoes than to the child wearing them – whilst disregarding other statements because they could be confused.
- Why not quote names of digital photography experts? Why not, 11 years later and with much more recent technology, get the same (or other) experts to give a definitive and conclusive opinion – something we haven’t seen to this day – about the photo? This is not a minor crime but one that has grabbed the attention of the entire world and we are certain that these experts would welcome to see their names given visibility because of gained prestige and respect they would gain. Also, one would expect that a theory that wishes to “run past professionals from all walks of life, time and again” and that revolves around when was a photo allegedly taken or not would have as first priority the absolute certification by experts that photo in question as NOT photoshopped, as is claimed by many, we being among those sceptics.
- Why no opinion sought from Mr Amaral, or if it was, why isn’t it mentioned.? As far as we know, Mr Amaral defends death on May 3.
- Why no evidence we have presented in our blog, about the Big Round Table, the booking sheets, the tapas reservation sheets, the crèche sheets, etc was not included? Do the researchers not agree with us? Up to now, besides saying that we write too much and we are a trial to read, no one has contradicted us factually.
This list is not exhaustive. Just some points we have discussed between ourselves but give a sample of what we think of the content.
About its importance within the game, we would say it has close to nil, not to say nil indeed.
However, in terms of clarifying certain areas of the game, it was – we believe unwittingly – definitely very revealing and helpful but we can’t or want to say more than that.
How someone thought this would ever be published by the mainstream media, Portuguese or British, boggles the mind and shows a total lack of self-awareness.
Hope to have answered, at least in some part, your question.
Can we have some names of who is in this so-called Madeleine McCann Research Group? Tony Bennett, Jill Havern, Sharon Lawence, Lizzy Hideho, PeterMac? Anyone else? All 5 of them are bent as a 9 bob note.
DeleteK9 is finally attempting to answer our questions. It has taken him more than week to start:
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/974938781181775873
Canine Truth @K9Truth
Why did Leicestershire Police write "as requested" in the cover note that was faxed with the Gaspar Statements 2 the PJ? Because LP had earlier given the PJ vague info about something odd that happened involving Maddie on a previous holiday. The odd ones here are LP. #McCann
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYetpWWXkAA4y6E.jpg:large
2:21 am - 17 Mar 2018
https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/974939114364702720
Canine Truth @K9Truth
FollowFollow @K9Truth
More
Source of previous screenshot …http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.ie/2016/09/is-dr-david-payne-formerly-of-leicester.html?m=1 … #McCann
2:22 am - 17 Mar 2018
*****
The picture annexed in the first tweet contains the following quote taken from the blog post linked in the second tweet:
“From May (2007) onwards, we became aware of information (coming in) from our British colleagues about something (very odd) that had happened within that group during a holiday (in Mallorca). They never told us specifically what. (We knew) it was something to do with Madeleine but, they (British) never gave us any details.”
It’s from an interview given by Mr Amaral.
Majorca appears in parenthesis. In parenthesis are deductions whoever transcribed thought best to insert. That means then the word “Majorca” was not said by Mr Amaral in that sentence.
(Cont)
(Cont)
ReplyDeleteLet us quote ourselves from our post “The Brit snitch” which we have linked multiple times in the “Gaspar statements” debate with K9 (our caps):
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYetpWWXkAA4y6E.jpg:large
http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2016/09/the-brit-snitch.html
“First it’s in the Chapter 9 – Majorca, September 2005, pgs 120,121.
With all due respect to the effort made to the translation we have found on the internet, we found that some important details were missing from it. This is our translation:
“What above is written was relayed on May 16, 2007, only thirteen days after Madeleine’s disappearance to the English police, by the S.G. and K.G. couple. It was important and pertinent information for the investigation. However nothing was transmitted to the Portuguese police. In the middle of July, rumours began to circle, among the team of investigators, which something similar would have happened, not being known, at the time, details and identity of the participants. These rumours pointed to an eventual identical situation that would have taken place in GREECE, during a holiday trip. However, we had no knowledge of any testimonial proof in that sense. Clarifications to the English police were asked, but nothing was confirmed at the time. I think that only after my departure from the investigation, perhaps at the end of October 2007, it is when the statement from K.G. would have been sent to the Portuguese police. With legitimacy one asks: what is the reason for the English police would have, as all indicates, hidden that statement for six months? When they knew that David Payne organiser of the trip to Majorca, and of whom were signalled abnormal behaviours in the relationship with children, was the same who organised the trip to Portugal, in which the holiday group of village of Luz was part and in which Madeleine was included, who was the first family friend to be seen by Kate McCann’s side after the child’s disappearance (as later will be seen) and on the date of the statement was still in Portugal, could be confronted with these statements? There can be no doubt that the Portuguese investigators could have moved forward with the investigation, in a quicker way, having knowledge of the eventual facts of Majorca, if they had knowledge of them in useful time. These statements with reference to the Majorca trip, seem to indicate a bizarre behaviour worthy of a profound investigation. Are we before a pertinent profile? Could this profile be related to what happened on the night of May 3? The credibility of the S.G. and K.G. statements cannot be easily put in question, as both are doctors and of the same circle of acquaintances – as the members of the Vila da Luz group, who are English doctors and know each other well.”
From this we get to know that it is GA who first hears “rumours” about the Gaspar statement in the middle of July.”
(Cont)
(Cont)
ReplyDeleteIn July 2008 Mr Amaral states clearly that the rumours are about things that happened in GREECE.
He states clearly he asks for information about the rumours about GREECE and gets NOTHING from the British: “ Clarifications to the English police were asked, but nothing was confirmed at the time.”
And confirms that only after he leaves, that the Gaspar statements about events in MAJORCA appear: “I think that only after my departure from the investigation, perhaps at the end of October 2007, it is when the statement from K.G. would have been sent to the Portuguese police”
To say that before they were sent that Mr Amaral was tipped off about events in MAJORCA is FALSE.
A blatant LIE.
To say it after more than a week’s investigation only shows despair.
So, the secret is Paedophilia. Mr Amaral requests information about Greece. They don’t send it. Up to here it fits.
Then we have the episode of the McCanns being practically made guilty by the British press, made arguidos, flown back to the UK.
Then in late September, the 180º turn of the British media and Mr Amaral gets sacked.
Then, and only after the 180º turn, does the Portuguese police ask SPECIFICALLY for the Gaspar statements regarding events in Majorca.
And the British police having had no problem in ignoring a similar request about GREECE in July, decide to concede and send the Gaspar statements in October.
And the secret was what? Oh, yes, paedophilia. Must not let the Portuguese know but what the heck, let’s play with fire and tease them a bit.
We will wait and see what he has to say next. Not about paedo-pushing because he continues to do that shamelessly but to what regards answering the questions we have put him.
This one, why did the PJ REQUEST specifically the Gaspar statements has not been responded.
https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/975072278722633735
ReplyDeleteCanine Truth @K9Truth
Was Amaral talking about the holiday in Greece (referred to in his book by GA) + not the "Gaspar" holiday in Mallorca? No, GA only heard about the Greece rumors in the middle of JULY, but had been informed by LP about the unspecified holiday from MAY onwards. #McCann
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYgnAD2XkAApklb.jpg:large
11:12 am - 17 Mar 2018
https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/975074208437989376
Canine Truth @K9Truth
Here's another translation of that passage that doesn't mention when Amaral heard rumors of the similar incident in Greece. #McCann
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYgnAD2XkAApklb.jpg:large
11:19 am - 17 Mar 2018
*****
We warned and K9, and he pretended not to listen.
We couldn’t have been clearer: “With all due respect to the effort made to the translation we have found on the internet, WE FOUND THAT SOME IMPORTANT DETAILS WERE MISSING FROM IT. This is our translation:”
So, there are things MISSING from that translation.
Let’s us transcribe in PORTUGUESE that passage of the book:
“O que acima fica escrito foi relatado a 16 de Maio de 2007, treze dias apenas depois do desaparecimento de Madeleine polícia inglesa, pelo casal S. G. e K. G. Era uma informação importante e pertinente para a investigação. No entanto, nada foi transmitido à policia portuguesa. EM MEADOS DE JULHO, COMEÇARAM A CORRER RUMORES, ENTRE A EQUIPA DE INVESTIGADORES, QUE ALGO DE PARECIDO SE TERIA PASSADO, DESCONHECENDO-SE, NA ALTURA, PORMENORES E A IDENTIDADE DOS INTERVENIENTES. ESTES RUMORES APONTAVAM PARA UMA SITUAÇÃO IDÊNTICA EVENTUALMENTE OCORRIDA NA GRÉCIA, NUMA VIAGEM DE FÉRIAS. Porém, não tivemos conhecimento de qualquer prova testemunhal nesse sentido. Pediram-se esclarecimentos à polícia inglesa, mas nada nos foi confirmado, na altura. Penso que só depois da minha saída da investigação, talvez em finais de Outubro de 2007, é que o depoimento de K-G. terá sido remetido à polícia portuguesa. Com legitimidade se pergunta: qual é a razão da polícia inglesa ter, ao que tudo indica, ocultado aquele depoimento durante seis meses? Quando souberam que o David Payne organizador da viagem a Maiorca, e a quem foram assinalados comportamentos anómalos no relacionamento com as crianças, era o mesmo que organizou a viagem a Portugal, que fazia parte do grupo de férias da aldeia da Luz onde se integrava Madeleine, que foi o primeiro amigo da familia a ser visto ao lado de Kate McCann após o desaparecimento da criança (como adiante se verá) e que na data do depoimento ainda se encontrava em Portugal, podendo ser confrontado com estas declarações. Não restam dúvidasque os investigadores portugueses poderiam ter avançado com investigação, de uma forma mais célere, tomando conhecimento dos eventuais factos de Maiorca, se deles tivessem tido conhecimento em tempo útil. Estes depoimentos referentes à viagem a Maiorca parecem indiciar um determinado comportamento bizarro e merecedor de Investigação aprofundada. Estaremos perante um perfil pertinente? Poderá este perfil relacionar-se com o que se passou na noite de 3 de Maio? A credibilidade dos depoimentos de S. G. e K. G. não pode ser facilmente posta em causa, já que ambos são médicos e do mesmo círculo dc conhecimentos — tal como os membros do grupo da Vila da Luz. que são médicos ingleses e se conhecem bem entre si.”
(Cont)
(Cont)
ReplyDeleteNow go get someone who speaks Portuguese, as it seems you don’t trust in our translation. See if they contradict this:
“EM MEADOS DE JULHO”, means “In the middle of July”, nothing to do with May.
“COMEÇARAM A CORRER RUMORES”, means “rumours began to circle”, which means they began to circulate in July, not in May.
“ESTES RUMORES APONTAVAM PARA UMA SITUAÇÃO IDÊNTICA EVENTUALMENTE OCORRIDA NA GRÉCIA, NUMA VIAGEM DE FÉRIAS”, the rumours that had started in July were about Greece.
And it was about these rumours, that started in July and about Greece that he asked information about,
But even if you were right, which you aren’t and you KNOW you aren’t, that would mean that in May Mr Amaral hears about paedo behaviour about David Payne in Majorca, in June he hears Yvonne Martin say, twice, that Payne may be related with crimes involving children (does NOT mention paedophilia) and decides NOT to use her statements (they are only annexed in October AFTER the Gaspars’) and only in July decides to ask information about a holiday in Greece? Is that what you are really saying? Thank goodness you’re making an effort in avoiding you are ridiculed.
But let’s set reason and logic aside and say that you are right, when you aren’t and you KNOW you aren’t, then Mr Amaral asked for information about Majorca after he supposedly, according to you, heard of it in May (he didn’t) AND for information about Greece after he heard of it in May, as he STATES, and gets NOTHING from the British authorities.
Then in October, Mr Rebelo asks for the Gaspars’ statements and the British send them. Was it his beautiful eyes? Or was it his smile?
Stop lying. We know you won’t but at least we asked.
https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/975152918918819841
ReplyDeleteCanine Truth @K9Truth
For the slow learners out there: Yes, Amaral gets vague info from LP about the contents of the Gaspar Statements in May. But Payne, the Gaspars + the country are not named. In mid-July GA hears rumors (from sources not specified) about an incident on a holiday in Greece. #McCann
4:32 pm - 17 Mar 2018
https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/975154828912492544
Canine Truth @K9Truth
Even in mid-July Amaral does not know if the incident described vaguely by LP (MAY INFO) is the same as the Greek incident (JULY INFO). He also does not necessarily know at that stage that the incidents are similar. #McCann
4:40 pm - 17 Mar 2018
https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/975156230896398337
Canine Truth @K9Truth
We can assume GA has been pressing LP for more details about the MAY INFO since May, so the receipt of the JULY INFO increases the urgency + scope of these requests. Finally someone in LP responds to these requests in October, with or without the approval of his seniors. #McCann
4:45 pm - 17 Mar 2018
*****
This is getting beyond ridiculous.
Please contact Mr Amaral and order him to rewrite his book, and if won’t do it, you will for him: “The Truth of the Lie, what Gonçalo Amaral really thought” by K9.
I’m surprised Teddy isn’t threatening K9 to block him for replying to you…
DeleteTeddy blocks people as if he owns twitter. He tells people to stop or… and he’s told K9 already not to bother.
As expected, this individual won't tire.
ReplyDeleteNow K9 is rambling about the holiday in Greece.
As the McCanns were not in Greece these rumours had nothing to do with Gaspars' statements:
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MATTHEW-OLDFIELD-10MAY.htm
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/RUSSELL-OBRIEN_ROGATORY.htm
So, according to K9, we have Payne showing he was a paedo to friends twice, in Greece and Majorca, before Luz.
Were these holidays, let's cater for our friend Payne the paedo, and supply him with our children kind of holidays?
To K9 it seems they were.
And then, just because it was requested LP sends damning information to the Portuguese, about Payne the paedo whose friends organised holidays so he could abuse their children. What poor secret guardians these Brits appear to be…
https://twitter.com/LoveTextusa/status/975341863589810176
ReplyDeleteLoveTextusaBlog @LoveTextusa
TEXTUSA contacted me and wishes the following to be known: the opinions expressed here are my own and that they want to make it clear that they don't want their name associated in any theory saying that Maddie died before May 3 #mccann
5:03 am - 18 Mar 2018
*****
We have asked LoveTextusa to dissociate us from any theory that Maddie died before May 3, which we think is absurd to say the least.
We thank LoveTextusa for agreeing to put out this tweet.
We are not and have never been on Twitter, we can’t speak for those on Twitter who use our name there.
We obviously thank all those who support us there, in this struggle for truth against many who pretend to be for it.
Those who choose to believe we are on Twitter will, no doubt, continue to do so, but for those who accept our word, can be assured this is not the case.
One reason we decided against using Twitter is the sheer effort of checking the credentials and beliefs of those appearing on one’s Twitter feed in support.
Twitter serves to express all opinions on all subjects and we see many on #mccann holding views on other matters with which we strongly disagree.
Very difficult to clarify that one agrees with a person on 2 or 3 subjects and disagrees on the rest. For that reason, we try our best in keeping our blog completely ideologically apolitical. We speak of political things but always the context of the Maddie case without letting pass to readers what are our personal standing.
The other reason for not being on Twitter is running a blog is too time consuming to attend to a twitter account as well.
And finally- how could anyone expect Textusa to confine the output to so few characters!?
Anthony Bennett
ReplyDelete
@zampos
1h1 hour ago
More
@LoveTestusa Yes, TextUSA will always defend 'after 6pm 3rd May'. Whatever the evidence. He does agree though that the Last Photo wasn't taken on 3 May. He says Gerry #McCann took it on 20 May! Yes! But I wish he would give up the pretence of being 'Maria Santos & the sisters'
What's he on about with the pretence thing, Textusa?
Anonymous 18 Mar 2018, 20:39:00
DeleteWe have reasons to keep our private information, private.
Even if we hadn’t, we have the right in wanting it to be private. Who we are is irrelevant to what we write.
We do not possess the absurd need for glory that Mr Bennett seems to have. He, or someone for him, has already even set up a Wikipedia page in advance of the forthcoming glory that he, or someone for him, feels he will be due.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Bennett_(politician)
We couldn’t care less what Mr Bennett says or thinks about us. We represent ourselves through our words and that is the only thing we wish to share publicly.
Revealing other people’s private information, or attempting to do so, only reveals one’s personality, nothing else.
We have already seen published publicly on the CMOMM forum a private conversation between me and Jill Havern, so this attitude does not minimally surprise us.
Nor would we be surprised if he was behind similar attempts of revealing our private information which has happened in other blogs, as anonymous or under the guise of Not Textusa (who denied this, and for once we believe him) as he seems to be behind things to which he does not give his name but rather ‘pushes’ those of others so that what he’s selling has some credibility.
Unpublished Anonymous at 18 Mar 2018, 21:44:00,
DeleteThank you for your comment.
We’re not publishing it because we are almost 100% certain that they are different people and if we did it would be feeding speculation and we prefer not to go that way.
Hope you understand.
It appears that Anthony Bennett is trying to ridicule you again on Twitter regarding the Last Photo.
DeleteAnonymous 19 Mar 2018, 12:46:00,
Delete"Ridicule you again"? When was the first time? Pray tell.
As on his Wikipedia page, which he, or someone for him, created, he's identified as a politician, one would expect that he would respect democracy.
Apparently that is not the case.
Back in the day he ran a quite participated poll on his forum and the majority of voters, readers of his forum which he so very tightly controls like a dictator, were in favour of our 3-photo composite thesis than of his not-photoshoped one. That made him furious.
Seeing him play with the caps of our name like a rebelling toddler trying to prove some point has been quite enjoyable. Hope he doesn't hold his breath too long.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/garda%C3%AD-appeal-for-information-about-mary-boyle-s-disappearance-1.3431795?mode=amp
ReplyDeletehttps://mobile.twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/975455722669559810
DeleteGemma O'Doherty@gemmaod1
The latest ‘plea’ by @GardaTraffic in the #MaryBoyle case is another deluded attempt to fool the public. Why don’t they arrest Mrs Ann Boyle and @fiannafailparty uncle #GerryGallagher? Former sergeant in charge Martin Collins makes it clear what happened:
Sgt Martin Collins describes a demand by politician Sean McEniff in...
www.youtube.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPEyFtnz9Lc&feature=youtu.be
7:35 pm · 18 Mar 2018
*****
It seems she’s going for the truth on the Mary Boyle case and we haven’t lost hope she’ll return to Maddie's.
https://mobile.twitter.com/fergbreen/status/975479543736741889
DeleteFerg Breen@fergbreen
Replying to @gemmaod1
2 missing persons articles on the journal today. One has comments on as usual, Mary Boyle article has comments off. Odd but not odd at all.
9:10 pm · 18 Mar 2018
https://twitter.com/zampos/status/975769746661629952
ReplyDeleteAnthony Bennett @zampos
The 'LAST PHOTO' of Maddie. The #McCann's say it was taken on the CLOUDY Thursday. Others suggest the SUNNY Sunday. Many others swear it has been photoshopped. The weirdest of all theories, completely unevidenced, is that of #TextUSA Here is the TEXTUSA LAST PHOTO THEORY, PART 1
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYqhJdYX4AA_T1M.jpg:large
9:23 am - 19 Mar 2018
https://twitter.com/zampos/status/975769888647237632
Anthony Bennett @zampos
The 'LAST PHOTO' of Maddie. The #McCann's say it was taken on the CLOUDY Thursday. Others suggest the SUNNY Sunday. Many others swear it has been photoshopped. The weirdest of all theories, completely unevidenced, is that of #TextUSA Here is the TEXTUSA LAST PHOTO THEORY, PART 2
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYqhgtoWkAEzE1z.jpg:large
9:24 am - 19 Mar 2018
https://twitter.com/zampos/status/975770061649661952
Anthony Bennett @zampos
The 'LAST PHOTO' of Maddie. The #McCann's say it was taken on the CLOUDY Thursday. Others suggest the SUNNY Sunday. Many others swear it has been photoshopped. The weirdest of all theories, completely unevidenced, is that of #TextUSA Here is the TEXTUSA LAST PHOTO THEORY, PART 3
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYqhqCLXkAQ9Xs2.jpg:large
9:24 am - 19 Mar 2018
******
“The weirdest of all theories, completely unevidenced”. Yes, we know, far too lacking in hard evidence. We never explain how we reach our conclusions. Terrible, terrible habit.
Maybe that was the reason why we didn’t write an article, annexed it to a letter and send it all to the Portuguese AG, while convincing some poor and naïve journalist to publish an article publicising it.
Sending completely unevidenced things to official authorities would be dumb and stupid, would ridicule oneself and deepen the gap between genuine internet journalism and the legitimate judicial authorities.
If we were to send something completely unevidenced, the Portuguese Attorney General would immediately conclude that, yes, the internet is filled with absurdity about this case.
We would never send such a thing that by association would damage severely the reputation of all those who have worked hard and honestly on the internet to find out what really happened to Maddie.
https://mobile.twitter.com/K9Truth/status/976077005430165504
ReplyDeleteSo he supports kiko theory and elite paedo ring in PdL!
Like Walkercan’s Pedville