Tuesday 27 November 2018

Scare tactics

Last night the daughter of a member of the team was stalked on her way home.

She reported the incident as she came home and it could have been a case of harassment. So waited for today and after she returned from school and did a reconstruction with her. Her path in yellow, in red, his:


From what was shown by the girl, as can be seen in this picture (which is, superimposed on a map, what was shown to the police), the man clearly wanted to convey the message that she was being followed. She went significantly out of her path and was always intercepted. There was no contact made outside eye contact.


Immediately it was decided to head to the nearest police station and report this. Our translation on what was put in the police report:

“Were present in this police department (…), accompanied by his/her daughter, minor, (…), both identified and associated as Participants, communicating a situation and behaviour on the part of an unknown individual that caused them suspicion.

According to (….), yesterday, around (…) when she left the (…), she crossed with an individual, unknown, who was on his mobile. She continued on her way to her residence, having passed by (…), arriving at (…). However, during the journey, she noticed that the person standing at (…) was, apparently, to following her. Because she felt followed, instead of taking the normal route and going home, she made her way through places where there were more people and with more light. She noticed that in certain moments of the journey, the individual approached and took a route in order to face her, nevertheless never spoke to her or had any compromising act.

The individual at stake would be (…); He wore (…).

The Participants, considering that this was a suspicious and strange behaviour on the part of the individual, decided to participate in the situation for preventive reasons.”

There were some other indications that the encounter with the man wasn’t just a random encounter with a stalker. The facts of that we will keep to ourselves.

There are 2 possibilities. This is either related to the case or it isn’t.

If it isn’t, then we are making a storm in a glass of water.

If it is, then it was meant to scare us. By scaring the family member of team member. A girl.

We had 2 options. Close the blog or not. Safety of our family members comes first.

We have decided to keep the blog open. Visibility is our safety. We cannot stop someone wanting to do something silly against any of us or our families. However, if we remain visible and continue our work as we have done, we feel the deterrence is greater.

That is the reason why we’re doing this post.

To those thinking that we will put anonymity before our families, even your warped, disgusting minds will tell you that the anonymity is irrelevant, we don’t need to do that.

Textusa is an anonymous woman because we want to make this exercise of citizenship nameless, to convey the idea that the anonymous citizen can make a difference whatever the humongous forces against.

That only means we want to keep anonymity. We don’t have to.

If we are correct in our suspicion this was a deliberate scare tactic to those now collaborating with those responsible for this, do take a look in the mirror. This is how low you have sunk.

The Officer who took the report recommended that we take this up with the PJ and that is what we have done/will do. The details of this we won't make public.

We think we don’t need to say how seriously we are taking this. Our actions speak louder than our words.



Post Scriptum:


To show clearly from where the photo the Frog has tweeted was taken from.

197 comments:

  1. I sincerely hope whoever's daughter it is is ok? If this is case related then I truly am astounded!!!! An innocent CHILD is fair game now????
    I pray, for your team's sake that it wasn't, but you were right to go to the police.

    Please stay safe & keep us informed.

    Best Wishes

    ReplyDelete
  2. That’s just awful, I hope the girl is ok. What a nasty thing to do to someone not directly involved in the blog. Even if they were that’s lower than low. You must seriously be hitting a nerve...please take care of yourselves and your family’s first and foremost. I hope the blog continues, its a great enlightener to me and I would miss it immensely if it were to close. That said safety is paramount.
    Sending love.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Horrific. I have no doubt this poor girl will be supported in the extreme. Having had to experience this is horrendous and unforgivable. I send my support and my best wishes and hope with all my heart this incident provokes the PJ to stand up and be shown to put the rights and care of their citizens firmly first.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Absolutely disgraceful - I think you do the right thing by remaining anonymous. There are some hideous people out there. Do what you need to keep yourself and families safe. Sending good wishes.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Just read read it: if it's stalking it«s horrific. Keep yourselves safe over there.
    Keep up the good work but not at the expense of your safety.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So pleased to know you are all well. Thank you for posting and for keeping the blog open. This is such a difficult time for you I can imagine that none of you can feel completely safe and the first thought is protection especially for our children. Let us know when the PJ picks up this person, hopefully they soon find the culprit who is out to threaten your peace.

    Stay safe.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It doesn't surprise me, unfortunately. I have always thought some of those involved in promoting the hoax are dangerous. Some are very wealthy and have elevated themselves to some godlike position in their own heads at least. They are bullies and will protect their own images at any cost. They have lost sight of reasonable behaviour and morals long ago.
    I am really sorry your family members have been affected and I'm sure you have our support no matter what action you take. I appeal to UK government / Portuguese government to put an end to this quickly. Please.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If this incident is something to do with the case and not a coincidence,I wonder if it has anything to do with yourself and another anon person suggesting the DP photos as being of possible interest.
    You two may have inadvertently hit on the key to the mystery.
    Food for thought anyway if nothing more.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Unpublished Anonymous 28 Nov 2018, 08:58:00

    Could you please say who you mean when you say “those you have been mentioning a great deal, and posting photos of”.

    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Scare tactics":

      In reply to your question, I refer to posters you have been commenting on for many months who are not anonymous. (censored).

      Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 28 Nov 2018, 14:01:00

      *****

      To be clear, you are accusing us of exposing the names of people who have exposed their names publicly themselves.

      Ok, now that is clear, what about the photos? Are you talking about photos of people who have put their own pictures in their public profiles?

      Delete
  10. Big Round Turd28 Nov 2018, 12:47:00

    Things that didn't happen

    1. Abduction

    2. This

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 3. Tapas Dinners

      Delete
    2. Replace 2. with tapas and you're on the mark.

      Delete
  11. NT has replied to this post, with a post in his blog called “Attention-seeking missile”:

    I debated for a while over whether to even respond to this, but I think it has gone far enough.

    As you may have seen, Textusa has posted a claim that a daughter of one of his ''team'' was followed home from school and that the incident was reported to the police.

    I'm sure it was very distressing for her and clearly reporting it to the police was the right thing to do.

    Allowing Textusa to use it for his own ends is, however, NOT the right thing to do.

    For idiots like Carla Spade to be making her usual allegations on Twitter is a very silly thing to do. It's also rather hypocritical - she is squealing like a stuck pig at her own details being revealed, yet thinks nothing of falsely claiming that I am Walker and Wright; something she has been doing for over a year.

    So bugger off ladies - and Textusa. I have no time for people who would exploit the distress of their own children for the sake of point scoring.

    Sad, sad wankers.

    Footnote:

    Incidentally, Carla, Textusa used your full name on numerous occasions, as on here https://textusa.blogspot.com/2015/11/non-post.html#more

    Perhaps you should direct your impotent rage at him?

    Posted by Not Textusa at 10:29 am

    3 comments:

    AnneGuedes28 November 2018 at 11:04
    In our times of dictatorship of victimity and strategy of emotion, what chance has a young pretty girl to be followed by a budding saviour in the event of occurring an attempt of abduction, MadeleineMcCanning her ?

    Jules..28 November 2018 at 11:39
    Strange how Tex has edited that post since yesterday and removed the police report and certain things..
    If the 'sister's' are unknown then how it can be connected to the case..
    Reply
    Not Textusa28 November 2018 at 12:03
    I didn't see the original, but I understand he made several references to this blog and it's readers. That was very foolish, which is presumably why he removed them. If anyone captured a copy, do let me know. His blog is already under investigation for harassment, any copies will be passed on to the Google team

    *****

    The point of publication of this post as we have explained, wasn’t victimhood, it was self protection.

    We inform readers that we took out the images of the report out of the post.

    Have meanwhile added what the report said in terms of what happened.

    No “certain things” were edited. Jules, as usual, lies.

    No ref was made in this post to NT’s blog. Anybody who downloaded it will see for themselves.

    No suggestion was made this had anything to do with him.

    We are suggesting that somebody does know identities, at a higher level than people who blog, and is using scare tactics.

    Nuala Seaton commented on our blog with her name. She wasn’t named by us. It was Mr Thompson who revealed to the world that Carla Spade was Nuala Seaton.

    About Anne Guedes’ facetious comment about a very serious situation, one doesn’t even need to be young or pretty to be stalked. And how does Anne Guedes know if the girl who was stalked is pretty or not?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We would like to add add that we consider Mr Thompson's outing of Nuala Seaton outrageous but not surprising. He has form.

      Delete
    2. And we mean form as in reputation, not as in previous convictions.

      Delete
    3. Censored comment:

      Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Scare tactics":

      II was horrified to see Bugsy the Bully "outing" Carla on #mccann, but like yourself was not surprised. He seems to derive great enjoyment from exposing people who want to remain anonymous, especially women. How very pro McCann of him! Now he says that he won't be tweeting on the McCann hashtag again. I wonder how long that will last? *sigh*
      Then there is this tweet from today:
      @MrJNH07
      Replying to @CaroleShooter

      It's not the first time that he's bullied women on the McCann #, I was told some pretty nasty information involving why (censored) isn't seen any more, which I intend to get to the bottom of. Oh and after what I said about 'antis/pros', he chose to stop following me. Transparent.
      I'm presuming that is about (censored).

      Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 28 Nov 2018, 19:19:00

      *****

      Anonymous at 28 Nov 2018, 19:19:00,

      We have censored your comment because it mentions the name of a person who, for quite some time is not seen linked to the case, so we chose to continue to respect this absence.

      Thank you for understanding.

      Delete
  12. I’ve got screen shots of original.
    Nothing was said about NT or his blog!!
    The Police reports are now back along with a translation to English (they are written in Portuguese with no translation in the original post)
    “Certain things” what things exactly? All looks the exactly the same to me apart from the now English translation of paperwork, as above.
    Can’t see Textusa are looking for a way out either. It doesn’t say Police said close blog. Textusa specifically says they will keep it open.
    There have always been dark forces....as we all know.
    The “gang” got it wrong again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jules, I’m anon above 17.01and Anon 27th 19.59 just after post was published and the time of the screen shots. Nothing added and nothing taken away. The foot of the post says 2 comments and as I was the second comment I took the screen shot. Carry on.....

      Delete
  13. Is AG suggesting that the stalker was indeed connected to M case?

    ReplyDelete
  14. How can Anne describe any stalker as a “budding saviour”?
    Any woman who has been followed by a man behaving like this wouldn’t find this an acceptable description.
    Having had training in basic self-defence for women in exactly these situations, my instructor, ex-army, advised exactly what happened here- head for populated area and bright lights. What he didn’t say is “the man could actually be your saviour.”
    He said to follow your instincts as instincts were usually informed by experience and if you felt uneasy, there was good reason.
    He didn’t say you’ll be a target if you’re young and pretty. He said some men enjoy a feeling of power by intimidating a woman.
    Likewise, the instinct this wasn’t about sexual predation but intimidation is valid.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Having now reconstructed 4 times the scenario (as the stalked, as the stalker, at the same time of day to check the various variables and at the same time of day to try to reproduce – as the stalker – what happened) we have come to the conclusion that it was a scare tactic.

    Plus, in our opinion it involved at least 3 operatives.

    Again, the reasons why we have come to this conclusion, we will keep to ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I was followed by a man from a railway train when I was a teenager, almost to my front door and I was terrified. The man got very close to me and I screamed louder than I knew I could scream and he ran off. That scared him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jane,

      Thank you for your comment.

      In our analysis we evidently looked at the possibility of being a creep.

      Your words "and he ran off" is one of many details that tell us, with certainty that this was not a creep. The man established very close contact twice and did not run.

      But, it wasn't only the fact that he didn't run off that rules out being a creep. Reconstructions are useful and show what is possible, what isn't, what is feasible and what isn't.

      Delete
  17. Do you believe in the power of positive thoughts? I'm sending mine to you and your family.

    ReplyDelete
  18. https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1067912526640275456
    Madeleine CaseTweets🌐‏ @McCannCaseTweet
    Replying to @Anvil161Anvil16
    Oh ok, cool! So who is Text USA? Is it one person, a group? Is their name really Maria Santos? Are they from Spain? #mccann
    2:46 PM - 28 Nov 2018

    *****
    https://twitter.com/Andreamariapre2/status/1067917839158390784
    Andrea maria preston‏ @Andreamariapre2
    Replying to @McCannCaseTweet @Anvil161Anvil16
    Maria Santos messaged me on FB with Textusa Avitar ...strange
    3:07 PM - 28 Nov 2018

    *****
    https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1067923143933587456
    Madeleine CaseTweets🌐‏ @McCannCaseTweet
    Replying to @Andreamariapre2 @Anvil161Anvil16
    Because there is the Maria Santos who made Madeleine #McCann mannequin blow up doll in PDL ? So not same person right?
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DtIGab8VAAAMzSv.jpg
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DtIGab-V4AAp1So.jpg
    3:28 PM - 28 Nov 2018

    ******

    To be clear about Andrea Marie Preston: received from her a friend request on FB, so sent her a message asking her if she was @Andreamariapre2, she confirmed she was and informed her that because she was a huge Mr Thompson fan on Twitter, that I would not only not accept her friend request as I would block her, which I did.

    To Isabelle McFadden, we suggest that she call Mark D at Operation Grange, and we are certain that he will inform her, after all he loves to talk to her including all that is related to the case.

    What happened to team’s member daughter only has come to confirm that the choice for anonymity was and is the right one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id106.htm

      Scroll down for mannequin doll
      It was Brazilian artist with full name
      Did Santos is surname.
      So now you are female Brazilian artist?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous 29 Nov 2018, 12:08:00,

      https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1067925852086652928
      Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐‏ @McCannCaseTweet
      Replying to @Anvil161Anvil16 @Andreamariapre2
      But seriously, so text USA is a secret? I’m just curious? Because when it attempts to write Portuguese, most of the time its Spanish with a Portuguese flair 😂😂😎 #mmcann
      3:38 pm - 28 Nov 2018

      *****

      It seems we're Spanish as well. Pity McFadden did not pick up the Dutch accent. With a bit of Australian. Oh, and we're American too.

      Delete
  19. https://twitter.com/triciauny/status/1067938473112420354
    Tricia‏ @triciauny
    Replying to @jules1602x
    Can I ask a question? Is textusa for or against the #McCann ‘s? I’m thinking for but I’m not sure. Been trying to follow lol
    4:29 pm - 28 Nov 2018

    *****

    We are for Justice.

    That means we are for the McCanns in whatever they are being wrongly accused of and against them in whatever they are accountable for.

    That said, it’s our opinion that the McCanns, helped to conceal the body of their daughter and are also guilty of obstruction of justice. Furthermore, we believe that Kate McCann, together with David Payne, is directly involved in the accident that caused Maddie’s death;

    In terms of negligence we are for the McCanns. We don’t believe there was negligence so that’s an accusation that is wrong. But you know who is against the McCanns on this? The McCanns themselves. They really want to come across as being negligent because without negligence the abduction is not possible.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Comments at NT continue:

    EricaCantona28 November 2018 at 13:11
    It seems obsession is alive and well in Textusa land.
    Instead of possibly sedating their kiddies all the McCanns needed was to read a few of Textusa's missives

    Jules..28 November 2018 at 14:51
    If Carla reads this then I'd like her to post the officer in charge of the allegation so I can eliminate myself...Thanks..

    john blacksmith28 November 2018 at 15:37
    I mean, OK, we all have goes at each other but this is just horrible, horrible and makes me wonder whether we're right to go on with stuff that can provoke actions as sick as this. I posted here before how worried I was about Textusa and how vulnerable he might be and now it looks like I'm right again, we've all gone a bit far. I mean I'm so upset I'd better re-phrase this to -

    - piss off texutusa. Looking for a way out are we? - "the police have told me to close this blog down - I don't fear for myself but there are others - great sacrifice - dark lickspittle forces forces are capable of anything - it will soon be time to go now before I answer that question about whether Nick Townsend is dead or alive. You repulsive, lying fraud.

    Jules..28 November 2018 at 16:38
    I see Tex has edited the post again but it's still not back to it's original form...No doubt an anonymous will have saved a copy minus certain things.. Vile person.. How low can one go..

    Sade Anslow28 November 2018 at 17:57
    What an absolute disgrace this is. Hardly an issue for NT or any of us, I think it's easy enough to prove which country you were in on a certain day.
    The fact textusa needs to sink this low for attention is worrying. If it truly happened, linking it to his pathetic blog is deplorable - especially knowing exactly what that nutter Carla would do with it.
    If it's all lies, well, say no more.
    Yes! I did just consider whether there's any truth in it. Perhaps even the girl is lying? Textusa of all people understands how young girls can lie, does he not?

    Not Textusa28 November 2018 at 20:05
    Well, after another day of complete nonsense it seems that the Textaloons will swallow anything.

    Clearly, it's very distressing that someone's child was followed, but how in the name of sanity does one get from that to some supposed 'dark, shadowy forces' intent on revenge for TableGate?

    If anyone hasn't realised yet, the whole table/swinging thing is complete bollocks, created by Textusa who is fixated with swinging for reasons unknown (but much guessed at)

    The swinging came first - forgive the pun - followed by the table. Or not followed by the table, depending on which side of the gateleg you perch.

    Everything else - literally everything else - is bullshit, used by Textusa to add flavour. I know, it's disappointing, isn't it? Like waiting ages for your meal to arrive then discovering that it's just one chicken wing and a fuckload of garnish.

    So Textusa, or whichever sister/brother it is, I suggest you worry about your kid and stop fucking about with fairy tales. No-one in Camp McCann will be giving a shit about you, if they've even heard of you.

    Not Textusa28 November 2018 at 20:33
    "......we have come to the conclusion that it was a scare tactic.

    Plus, in our opinion it involved at least 3 operatives."

    Seriously, I hope you are not telling your kid this

    (Cont)

    ReplyDelete
  21. (Cont)

    Anonymous28 November 2018 at 20:36
    A member of your family (pretending for a second that it's not just one bored guy writing the whole thing) is stalked.

    You've done the right thing, going to authorities for help. What next?

    A. Allow authorities to look into it, and await their conclusions. Keep quiet about what you think happened so as not to cause hindrance.

    B. Bleat about it in public, potentially stunting any progress police could make/making sure to include a microscopic image of a nonspecific police report/drawing conclusions by yourself/instead of thinking of safety measures like providing her a phone, openly arse about in the streets playing investigator/create new characters on the fly (1 weirdo becoming 3 'operatives', which sounds so much more important)

    C. Nothing because it never happened, and this loony attention grab wouldn't fool anyone
    Reply
    Not Textusa28 November 2018 at 21:16
    The idea of farting about doing reconstructions and generally getting in the way is just mental. If the plods subsequently ask the public if they saw anything they'll say "Yes, there was a group of them - two dozy bitches and a cross-dresser, following people about and measuring tables. Very dodgy"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We would like to ask Blacksmith where we have said ""the police have told me to close this blog down".

      Thank you.

      Delete
    2. Knowing how quick the gang are to take screenshots of the blog, plus their ability to download images, all of the accusations of lying, things extracted in the original version... just shows what liars they are.
      Their reactions are vile. But shows what they are really like beneath the superficial veneers of sophistication and literary pretensions.

      Delete
    3. Mr Thompson is the only one who has ever said something similar to "not just one bored guy writing the whole thing".

      For a self-claimed brave man who accuses others of cowardice for writing under anonymity, then he has just called himself a coward. Mr Thompson does say truthful things about himself sometimes, after all. Who’d a thunk it?

      Delete
    4. Why assume girl didn’t have a phone?
      Many women being followed may have phones, but immediate action to evade the person following doesn’t always allow time to make a call.
      By the time it gets a response, the attack could be taking place.
      First response, especially near home, is to get home as quickly as possible, not stop to make a call.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous 29 Nov 2018, 14:29:00,

      The girl did have a phone with her.

      What use she gave to it is between herself, her parents, the police officer to which the incident was reported and whomever it was thought best share that information with, to know.

      Delete
    6. Unpublished Pseudo Nym at 29 Nov 2018, 14:56:00

      We stopped reading you after “I can assure you I have not…” which were the first words of your comment because after that, we knew you were lying. You see, there are give-aways that show when you are telling a lie. One is when you open your mouth and speak. Another, is when you write “I can assure you…”

      Seriously? You really thought that we would expect anything from you other than you, again, trying to play the upstanding hero-citizen victimised by so many, many dastardly people?

      You record stands for itself and can be seen by everyone. It’s much more visible than the plastic in the ocean that, allegedly worries you and your new BFF (should we say boss?).

      About sending messages to others, please don’t mistake us for you. You are the errand boy.

      Now go use NT’s blog as the message board it has become.

      PS Stop deleting tweets.

      Delete
    7. Unpublished Pseudo Nym at 29 Nov 2018, 15:51:00,

      “You are the liar, as proved many times over.”

      We are waiting for the list of the hundred of lies proven. In batches of 10. Make you life easier, batches of 5.

      Please don’t bang on the same “lie”, that we saying NT is Walker (by the way to prove that is a lie you would have to be able to prove who were BOTH NT and Walker). We have already replied to that. Do list the other lies, the hundreds of them. It should be easy. Go on.

      About the girl, don’t worry, she’s reading all the comments. She’s a teenager, old enough to understand.

      Delete
    8. http://archive.is/w0oap
      This is Google's cache of http://laidbareblog.blogspot.com/2015/05/vague-nannies-and-contradictions.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on 12 Oct 2018 16:11:54 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more.

      Why has Ben T deleted this post about the nannies from his blog?

      Delete
    9. From "FB Anon":

      "Anonymous 30 Nov 2018, 11:54:00: It is indeed interesting to see that Ben Thompson has deleted this post from his blog. In it he says "Can we trust the statements of the nannies? Well, certainly not all of them, so who was lying, and why?
      Mary Poppins sang of the importance of a spoonful of sugar, in the case of these statements it's more like a rather large pinch of salt." So, in 2015, he claims that the nannies are lying. Yet in 2018, his good friend NT is berating Lizzy Taylor for not believing Catriona Baker and says this "Now - can you tell me what possible relevance her Facebook friends are to her accounts of what she witnessed? The inference is quite clear - that there is some reason to be suspicious of her because she may have an extremely loose, and as far as I know, unproven, link to the McCanns? I'm pretty disgusted that someone went rifling through the poor girl's contacts in the first place, but to suggest that it means she lied - which despite your floundering, is the clear inference - is appalling." Then Ben Thompson replies with this "So what does textusa do? He starts accusing scores of staff at the Ocean Club of being part of a huge conspiracy, that they all lied to cover up the disappearance of Madeleine." Hang on, wasn't Ben accusing the nannies of lying back in 2015?"

      Delete
    10. Now that Mr Thompson and his friends are trying to pass off that these tweets were sent by some fake account pretending to be him, they weren’t, they were sent by him:

      https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1067537860843266050
      00Bugsy‏ @TheBunnyReturns
      Replying to @CaroleShooter @xxSiLverdoexx and 4 others
      Whilst you're heading toward your 48th hour of moaning about Jilly and whipping up hate - simply because you threw a tantrum. How about we discuss you insulting the memory of millions of people, and their families, by claiming the holocaust was faked? Such a nice lady eh #McCann
      1:57 pm - 27 Nov 2018

      https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1067555711406784512
      00Bugsy‏ @TheBunnyReturns
      Replying to @CaroleShooter
      Really, I thought you didn't believe he did anything wrong? You did claim the holocaust was an invention.
      3:08 pm - 27 Nov 2018

      *****

      Clearly calling CaroleShooter a Holocaust denier. Which is a crime as Carole, who seems now to be overlookin the insult, as said so in very clear terms.

      Carole has said VERY CLEARLY that she is NOT a Holocaust denier.

      Delete
    11. FB Anon,

      Please don’t blame Mr Thompson, he writes what he’s told to write. He has no opinion of his own:

      https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1067107492734427136
      00Bugsy‏ @TheBunnyReturns
      Replying to @PollyGraph69 @xxSiLverdoexx
      I'll tell you why I get annoyed that neglect is stated as fact by some, Debbie. When I first started posting about the case, I was told by someone I trusted, that the PJ & Rebelo had a theory that the kids were all left in 1 apt. I was told that was fact, and told to write it up.
      9:27 am - 26 Nov 2018

      Delete
    12. On Nov 30, a certain tweeter was asked by an anon person to share a message to KMc.
      The tweet contained a specific and serious allegation which I won’t repeat. The author of the allegation is safely anonymous and the tweeter is safe from legal action in the USA.
      As Blacksmith and the tweeter share a mutual admiration and Blacksmith accused another blog of being a cesspit for making allegations of this nature, it seems a real irony.
      I noted with interest who re-tweeted this. Some of the tweeter’s usual supporters didn’t, quite sensibly, but a few others did.
      Of course, it’s possible anon is able to prove the allegation, but as the tweeter says it doesn’t 100% represent her views, she obviously isn’t certain it’s true and can’t guarantee that to those who retweet.
      We may see more of these forwarded messages as readers are invited to send them for posting.
      I’m sure many will, as they are safely anon, but it will be interesting to see if Blacksmith makes any comment about this postbox message system.

      Delete
    13. I've seen the tweet you're referring to, Anon 10:56, and anyone can report abusive twitter accounts at this twitter help page, following. I'd encourage as many as possible to do so because I think that's the only way twitter take such things seriously. There's no way anonymous accusations should be allowed to remain there.

      Here's the twitter help page https://help.twitter.com/forms/abusiveuser

      Delete
    14. @16:40,

      My point wasn’t whether the allegation was true or not. The anon source may have proof. My first point was that the tweeter, who is safe from legal action, hasn’t recognised or warned U.K. followers of the dangers of re-tweeting this.
      My second point was that she and Blacksmith are great pals and I wondered what he thought of her tweet and the specific allegation, considering his contempt for another blog who made similar suggestions, rather than direct allegations.
      Or is it OK for anyone to post their allegations to her, for her to repeat them, even if she doesn’t 100% agree?
      What if anyone posted the swinging theory?

      Twitter, as far as I know, don’t just remove tweets because of the threat of legal action. It’s up to the person referred to in the tweet to take action.
      How would twitter determine if allegations were true or not?

      Delete
    15. @17:49,
      Yes, I realised that, sorry for not clarifying, I didn't have time to. The difference of posting tweets about 'theories' like swinging and her tweet mentioned above, is that the words directly allege that a UK professional is a paedophile, where doing so is a criminal offence. It makes no difference where the person tweeting lives/tweets from, as the target is a UK citizen (added to which individuals re-tweeting may be in the UK), and such allegations are definitely prohibited from twitter.

      For the person posting the original tweet to imply that there are lying allegations of crimes committed by UK professionals, and that public bodies have conspired to hide child abuse, that's a criminal offence in the UK itself. So would anyone posting a specific allegation against an individual, to say that 'this person engaged in swinging with another adult, on this specified time and date', if they knew that to be false. It's the specified false allegation which makes it criminal.

      I'd have to agree completely that those of her associates should be speaking out about the claims made! As for twitter's response to accusations that a professional in the UK (regardless of what we may think of him) has committed this crime, along with all the implications of collusion, this is a clear violation against its terms of use.

      Delete
  22. I see the non obsessed gang are still 100% obsessed. This blog worries them greatly, which is a superb indicator that you are doing a damn fine job. As in showbiz, you know you are relevant when you are being talked and written about and boy do they talk/write. The blog is consuming the small but overly invested lick-spittle mob. Wonderful!

    ReplyDelete
  23. https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1067930212938276864
    00The Jules... 🕵️‍♀️ 🐌🌸🐌🌸🐌🌸‏ @jules1602x
    Carla & Tex are liars... But let's blame Ben for everything..🙄Note the dates.. #McCann
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DtIM10rX4AE-lrf.jpg
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DtIM2boX4AAB_7T.jpg
    3:56 PM - 28 Nov 2018

    *****
    https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1067945623071141890
    Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
    Replying to @jules1602x
    I think the point is Tex never said the Spade is Nuala. That was Ben's doing. Bet his sword broke when he fell on it,.
    4:57 pm - 28 Nov 2018

    *****
    https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1067948631322439680
    00The Jules... 🕵️‍♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸‏ @jules1602x
    Replying to @FragrantFrog
    No Froggy.. The point is Tex said they had never fully named her.. Plus she had posted under that name on FB.. Just like they fully named me on there.. Hypocrites the pair of them...
    5:09 pm - 28 Nov 2018

    *****
    https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1067951200019128321
    Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
    Replying to @jules1602x
    Tex did name her, agreed. But Tex never said that Nuala was Carla Spade, that's the point. You were doxxed because of your pic. Still, Nuala is a coffee mug so we're not really any the wiser.
    5:19 pm - 28 Nov 2018

    *****
    https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1068083602288754688
    00The Jules... 🕵️‍♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸‏ @jules1602x
    Replying to @FragrantFrog
    It's good you noticed I was doxxed... So you note the hypocrisy... :)
    2:05 am - 29 Nov 2018

    *****

    Nuala Seaton is a public FB profile. Nuala outed herself on FB in exactly the same was as EVERYONE else who uses FB.

    As Frog said, we have never linked Carla Spade to Nuala Seaton. This link was not made public by anyone until Mr Thompson, being his usual low-life self, did it:
    https://mobile.twitter.com/CarlaSpade/status/1066431421689065473

    If we had outed Carla Spade as Nuala previously, why would then Mr Thompson proclaim it to the world as if he had just released areal photos of Area 51?

    From what we have read, this information was given to him privately. The fact that Mr Thompson made it public just confirms the man’s lack of moral compass. And the same is lacking in those who support him.

    About Jules’ photo, we did not use any. What happened is that we published a post on FB and it contained a link to one of Jules’ tweets. FB, not us (all those who publish on FB are familiar with this and Jules is an admin of a group of, allegedly 37,000+ members) chooses what appears as the image of the post. In this particular instance, it was Jules’ picture from her Twitter avatar because of said link.

    This was explained then to Jules.

    The hypocrisy is noted, so is the dishonesty and the shamelessness.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Why they continue to try and defame you I just don’t know. They tie themselves up in knots every time. The more they persist the more you are exonerated. May the blog long continue, your well and truly ruffling their feathers.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Update on comments at NT:

    DE F29 November 2018 at 14:11
    Ah, but the reason they did all those reconstructions they will keep to themselves. I rather think that if they didn't, they may well receive a visit from Nurse Ratched with strait-jackets and taken for some frontal lobotomising.

    Not Textusa29 November 2018 at 18:52
    Okay - a request.
    Frankly, I find this business rather distasteful to say the least. I certainly wouldn’t be happy about someone posting my business all over a blog if I was the young person concerned and it was absolutely disgusting when it was done to a young witness in the McCann case.

    I won’t be publishing any further comments on this matter. That is not a reflection on what has been posted already, but I am not having this place used for a certain person’s psychodramas. Can we move along please? The matter is in the hands of the police and it should be left with them to deal with it.

    *****

    The person who decided to make a post accusing us of exploiting to our benefit the fact that a teenage girl was stalked has now found that this whole business is distasteful.

    Distasteful doesn’t half describe what the girl was put through. And as time passes and the importance of certain details become clearer, a crimson bright red line was crossed. A crossing that defines very clearly who we are up against.

    To those who have accused, like NT and the Lick-Spittle gang, of exploiting our incident, it’s very clear to all that after having lived for the last 10 years with only the empathy of our 2 Chinese readers, we decided, while on the BRT offensive, to pull a sympathy card.

    Why pull a sympathy card? According to Blacksmith it was “Looking for a way out are we?”. A way out of what? Of being proven wrong? Do we have a problem with that? In case that happens, we will say then what we say right now: all we have written was with the absolute honesty of belief. And IF we are proven wrong, we will recognise that fact and will detail exactly where we were wrong and why we were wrong.

    We won’t say that we were misled or fooled by anyone or that we went after the opinion of others. We assume our opinions at each moment in time and the change of them whenever they happen.

    The disrespect shown to the girl by those who oppose us, is just heinous.

    The psychological violence that she and her family were subject to, demands that we don’t let this go and we have to take this to its fullest consequences. Are we exaggerating? When it comes to protecting one’s family there’s no such thing as exaggerating.

    About another vile accusation by NT against us, when he says “and it was absolutely disgusting when it was done to a young witness in the McCann case” we will leave it to the readers to judge who used the minor, TS, in question:
    http://textusa.blogspot.com/2012/03/edgars-cronic-discrepancy-syndrome.html
    http://textusa.blogspot.com/2012/03/child-abused.html
    http://textusa.blogspot.com/2012/04/not-even-alice-in-wonderland.html
    http://textusa.blogspot.com/2012/04/mockery-within-mockery.html
    http://textusa.blogspot.com/2012/04/in-previous-post-not-even-alice-in.html
    http://textusa.blogspot.com/2012/04/not-even-alice-in-wonderland.html

    It was not TS’ fault she was used. The fault is in whoever convinced her to do what she did and in whoever convinced those who convinced her.

    Is it “absolutely disgusting”? Yes, absolutely disgusting but now the confirmation has come that these people have absolutely no decency or moral compass. No qualms whatsoever in subjecting a girl to an ordeal.

    To all those who have sent us messages of support, both publicly and privately we would like to express our heartfelt gratitude. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  26. https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1067908706996637696
    Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐‏ @McCannCaseTweet
    Replying to @HRHLadyVegan
    Blacksmith is GOD!!! (3 x cloud emoticons) (shooting star emoticon) #McCann
    2:30 pm - 28 Nov 2018

    *****
    https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1067912072997060608
    Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
    Replying to @McCannCaseTweet @HRHLadyVegan
    Really? I'll just leave this here for you to digest......
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DtH8T9qWoAAeHSI.jpg
    2:44 pm - 28 Nov 2018

    [The picture attached to the tweet says the following:
    BLACKSMITHS BLOGS
    Thank you Global Moderator. I’m not posting very much but my absence from here is partly due to my loss of the link to your site – until I saw it on another site the other day.
    I made it clear some time ago that all I have to offer now is the occasional flat assertion. No reasoned claims, no evidence and definitely no imputation of guilt against anybody. People can choose to take them or leave them, just as they did when I wasted hours putting forth the evidence. None of them involve or imply inside knowledge.
    by AJS [AKA Blacksmith]
    on Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:02 am
    Search in: THE NCCANN CASE
    Topic: Blacksmiths Blogs
    Replies: 10
    Views 356.]

    *****

    It seems that Blacksmith is now more worried to prove that Nick Townsend exists more than Nick Townsend himself is.

    Nick Townsend who supposedly filled with comments pages and pages with such relevance that Blacksmith had difficulty in finding where these people reunited because he lost the link.

    Postman, could you please send this parcel back to addressee: “You repulsive, lying fraud”.

    ReplyDelete
  27. https://twitter.com/SadeElisha86/status/1068278068681326594
    Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
    Replying to @jules1602x
    I think the point is Tex never said the Spade is Nuala. That was Ben's doing. Bet his sword broke when he fell on it,.
    4:57 pm - 28 Nov 2018

    *****
    https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1067945623071141890
    00Sade 🕵️‍♀️‏ @SadeElisha86
    Replying to @FragrantFrog @jules1602x
    Woop-de-fkn-do One anonymous entity has been linked to another, halt the manufacturing of circulcular tables, STAT
    2:58 pm - 29 Nov 2018

    *****

    Says the person who accuses us (one of them, the other 2 being Mr Thompson and Jules) of lying when we say that NT is Walker.

    Go figure. No, no need, it has been long figured out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Forgot that the master himself, NT, also accuses us of lying when we say that.

      Delete
    2. That's because you are. The things you say are not normal, they are nasty. If you're so convinced of all this secret gang stuff, and stalking of your family, take it ALL to the cops. Then when they tell you its not correct, think about what you're doing with your life. Instead of wasting it copying and pasting. Otherwise, it could be you who ends up arrested.

      Delete
    3. Who is manufacturing circular tables? Certainly not Textusa. Sounds more like an admission....

      Delete
  28. They clearly don't like that you went public about the incident, which only confirms that you are right - however difficult it must have been to make this decision. My best wishes to you and your family. We the Chinese readers are here because we are ridiculously optimistic, so thank you for keeping our hopes alive.

    I was wondering what it means to Anne Guedes to "MadeleineMcCann" someone. It is Chinese to me (oops...). Could it be some coded language beside the very thick humour?

    NotFrog

    ReplyDelete
  29. HiTextusa sisters, it’s all very quiet on here and after recent events that’s understandable. Please let us know that all is well and you are just taking a break. I’m worried for you. It seems one or two have gone missing on the # as a result of a certain person/gang. They have been causing havoc once again.
    Sending regards to you all. Take care x

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 4 Dec 2018, 06:52:00

      We’re fine, just attending happy events has kept us busy over the weekend.

      And now we have a meeting planned with an old fat man, a certain Mr Claus, who won’t budge from that happening on the night of the 24th and insists on us celebrating his presence the following day.

      Then, if that wasn’t enough, we have also committed to receive this entity called ‘2019’ at the end of Dec 31!

      Just to say that we are on Christmas break and that life goes on. Wishing our readers the best holidays possible.

      Thank you for your concern which is much appreciated.

      Delete
  30. https://twitter.com/CaroleShooter/status/1069552060415307776
    InEz ShOoTa!‏ @CaroleShooter
    Because of the actions of one of the McCann tag tweeters (backed by the prominent personality) I am now having to install security equipment in my home.
    3:20 AM - 3 Dec 2018

    *****

    Things seem to be getting out of control.

    CaroleShooter doesn’t share our views but we are concerned she feels threatened.

    To be clear, this is not a case of the enemy of my enemy is my friend. We reject that concept in this situation as in any other, but the words “I am now having to install security equipment in my home” should worry everyone and should cause outrage that anyone has felt the need to have said them.

    We have no knowledge of what’s been said to her in twitter DMs. Nor have we had any contact with her.

    We noted she had received and accepted an apology and didn’t want to intervene with any comment. Nor were we, or are we sure Inez would welcome it.

    However, having seen the latest developments and considering our position, we felt we should say something. When things took (and are taking) a sour turn for us, all comments in solidarity were very much appreciated and that is what this comment intends: to show CaroleShooter our total solidarity.

    If she tells us to butt out, we will.

    To those making her feel this unsafe, a Portuguese expression “ganhem juízo!”.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems CaroleShooter has closed her Twitter account.
      https://twitter.com/caroleshooter

      We hope all is ok with her.

      Delete
  31. https://twitter.com/DesireeLWiggin1/status/1070084795974250496
    Desiree L Wiggins‏ @DesireeLWiggin1
    Replying to @BourgeoisViews @McCannFacts and 5 others
    The entire Tapas crew lied through their teeth. So, what makes you think they didn't "look the other way?" They all looked the other way on Kate's 'open window' that never was. FACT. #McCann
    2:37 pm - 4 Dec 2018

    *****

    Strangely this tweet was liked by @ZaneZeleti, @Andreamariapre2 and @xxSiLverdoexx

    Strangely, or maybe not, no one jumped on this tweeter.

    Definitely not strange is the fact that only those who support the swinging theory are not allowed to say "the Tapas crew lied through their teeth". It's even said, only when they say it, that it's bonkers to say it! Why?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think Desiree means the T9, not staff.
      Crew usually means staff but in the UK we use it also to mean a group of like-minded people, as in “B and his crew all behave in the same way.”

      Delete
    2. Anonymous 5 Dec 2018, 10:12:00,

      Thank you, we stand corrected.

      In @DesireeLWiggin1's defence she does consider the possibility that they are swingers:

      https://twitter.com/DesireeLWiggin1/status/1070101062042955776
      Desiree L Wiggins‏ @DesireeLWiggin1
      Replying to @CarlaSpade
      Because they were friends, swingers, pedos, cohorts? Some, any, or all of the reasons listed.
      3:42 pm - 4 Dec 2018

      Delete
    3. From "FB Anon":

      "Desiree Wiggins is American I think, but agree can mean either staff or a group of friends/supporters. I've been watching with interest what's been happening on Twitter over the past week, with people being jumped on and vilified for having different views. Carla Spade has hit the nail on the head with her tweet: " What I see is #McCann has become the place where "regulars" only allow ganging up on the parents, and any other debate is squashed. That's not looking for justice, it's a lynch mob against K&G."

      This is the difference between your blog, Textusa, that seeks to find the truth, and those that seek to condemn the McCanns and cover up the truth. Karen Lowe Sanders, one of the JforM admin on FB and regular commenter on NT, is one of those who in my opinion, keeps up the hatred towards the parents while also trying to shut down any suggestion that others might be involved in the cover up. This is what she has to say about Carla:" Karen Lowe Sanders ‏@EricaCantona7 Follow Follow @EricaCantona7 More Replying to @Tealtraum @xxSiLverdoexx and 4 others The Spade is unhinged clearly, too much reading of that anaesthetic blog will do that to you, it was only a matter of time #McCann"

      So, this is the depths they have sunk to on Twitter? Suggesting someone is mentally ill for believing the cover up?"

      Delete
    4. Probably good to point out the fact that Desiree Wiggins claims to be American, regardless of what evidence there is to suggest the contrary...

      Delete
    5. I also concur with this comment. This person Karen Sanders is quite new to Twitter I believe (I don't know who she is admin for as I don't do FB) but she is continually spoiling for a fight and not just with McCann supporters, she mocks fellow anti's & is very condescending. I don't know why she feels so superior but she contributes nothing towards the case. Just constantly looling for tweets she can make fun of. She is forever getting digs in at Textusa when, as far as I'm aware, she doesn't read the blog? I steer clear as she currently has some kind of agenda.

      Delete
  32. Censored comment:

    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Scare tactics":

    Interesting comment FB anon 11:22:00. Karen Lowe Sanders (appropriately named 'low', a relative of (censored), maybe?) is one of those character attacking Ben T sycophants who has nothing to say about his hypocritical about face regarding the nannies. More hypocrisy. In her twitter photos, how many times does she reference the PJ Files, unlike Carla Spade and even then, with 71 followers, who's actually listening to anything she says apart from more BT sycophants?

    Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 5 Dec 2018, 14:28:00

    *****

    Anonymous 5 Dec 2018, 14:28:00,

    We have censored your comment because we don’t have any reason to believe that Yapyap has anything to do with the person you have mentioned and you are linking their 2 names.

    Hope you understand.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Hi - can someone kindly explain what "#McCann" means on (mainly)twitter posts? I'm mystified.. thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 5 Dec 2018, 18:52:00,

      We are not on Twitter but we think we can say with certainty that the ‘#’ symbol represents a topic of interest.

      Those on twitter who choose to follow the #mccann are notified with every tweet that contains in the text ‘#mccann’.

      For that reason #mccann has become the reference # for all Maddie case related tweets.

      Hope that helps and hopefully we haven’t said anything wrong.

      Delete
    2. It does - thank you for explaining. Best wishes.

      Delete
    3. You're wrong there Mr T. You can't "follow" a hashtag, and you don't get notifications from one either. A person only gets notified if someone favourites a tweet they have made, if someone retweets a tweet they've made, if someone favourites a tweet in a thread they they commented on, if someone retweets a tweet in a thread they commented on, or if they get a new follower. Your certainties are often wrong though so no shock there.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous 6 Dec 2018, 04:19:00,

      However useful the information you have given about how Twitter works, which we hope will help Anonymous 5 Dec 2018, 18:52:00, the only certainty we have given in this post Mr “I can assure you that…”, is that the girl was not followed by a random stalker and that she wasn’t a random target.

      Your comment, like that from others like you just disrespects her and her ordeal.

      Delete
    5. Incidentally, the individual contending with you about how twitter 'works', is wrong, in the sense that they are speaking about twitter defined 'terms'. You do 'follow' hashtags like #McCann, even as you are without an account (I believe). They're trying to argue about 'notifications', which is a twitter specific term (how twitter let you know that someone responded to your tweet), so that may be accurate, but you can still 'follow' (also twitter specific) twitter 'discussions' on a hashtag. The point of a hashtag is that one can 'click' it, which also allows other possible usages.

      Delete
  34. https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1070471906632060928
    Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
    Replying to @CarlaSpade @Anvil161Anvil16
    Actually there is another photo taken on 4th May by someone from Block 2 balcony which is far more interesting. It was Mr Port's presence in that photo & the Sky News video of same day which provided some vital evidence. Who is Judas iyo?
    4:16 pm - 5 Dec 2018

    *****

    Oh, so we have another “Jules’ secret”, is that it? A photo that reveals all.

    Why make it public? Why solve the mystery when it’s much more entertaining to continue to play games around the death of a 4 yr old?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Frog has published the photo:

      https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1070796609657679872
      Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
      Replying to @CarlaSpade @Anvil161Anvil16
      Not secret. Here it is. Enlarge to 300% & tell me what you notice.
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dtw7y25WwAAYBSc.jpg
      1:46 pm - 6 Dec 2018

      *****

      It turns out that it has nothing to do with the BRT.

      The Frog then goes on to say that this picture is much more relevant than the BRT.

      It turns out that’s supposed to be all about Robert Murat having changed clothes on the morning of the 4th.

      We don’t understand why this photo. To prove this point all she had to do was to put up these 2 other pics:
      http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/sitebuilderpictures/dfmm010.jpg
      from this page:
      http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id468.htm
      And:
      http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/murat.jpg
      from this page:
      http://www.anorak.co.uk/175713/reviews/madeleine-mccann-robert-murat-not-alone.html

      They show clearly Murat, and no question that it’s Murat, in different clothes on May 4, and it’s clear both are from May 4, so no need to enlarge any photo to 300% to see that.

      The Frog has said that this is more relevant than the BRT. Upfront, it’s not. Even in the worst-case scenarios for Mr Murat implied by the Frog.

      The lack of BRT implies the involvement of “good” people in the hoax. Involving Murat is to involve someone who is already involved, as its public that he has been as much cleared by the Portuguese justice system as the McCanns have: he hasn’t been.

      Liars who say he has been cleared and who also lie saying that the PJ have apologised to Murat are just that, liars.

      One does not need any photos to see that there’s something that doesn’t add up with Murat’s presence in the events. One just has to read the statements from him, from his mother, from Stephen Carpenter and from the journalist Cecília Pires.

      So, Murat changed clothes that day.

      By the way, the Frog has just thrown out the window her premise that a person wearing same clothes on 2 different photos PROVE same day as she has tried to do with about Mr Len Port when she published the high-definition picture of Tapas, AKA as the Tapas posh picture. Murat proves that premise is invalid and who proves that it isn’t a proof? The Frog.

      What’s the big deal about Murat changing his clothes that day? There’s no big deal.

      Let’s start with the worst of scenarios for Murat. One where he handled the body and as soon he got word that the tracking dogs were coming, he played safe and went home and changed.

      Next scenario, would be the one in which he didn’t sleep that night (when he was supposed to have found out that Maddie has disappeared only in the morning) so during a period of less activity, went home and took a shower and put on a new set of clothes.

      In both scenarios above implied by the Frog, it implicates Murat simply because he didn’t sleep on a night he was supposed to be sleeping peacefully. But does the change of clothes prove any or them?

      All could have a simple explanation as the Frog ends up giving (funny to start saying something is important and then end up explaining why it isn’t) and that is that he dressed up in a shirt to go to work and after realising that he was going to walk a lot looking for Maddie, he went home and changed into something more comfortable for it.

      Please note that we don’t know when the photos with him with the dark blue t-shirt were taken. By the angle of the shadow it seems to be 2/3 hours either way of noon, and taking into account the dogs were not immediately there in the morning we would estimate – without being absolutely certain – that it was in the afternoon.

      (Cont)

      Delete
    2. (Cont)

      So, in truth, the photo presented by the Frog has absolutely no relevance for the purposes she intended. Even she recognises that fact:

      https://twitter.com/Anvil161Anvil16/status/1070837832942534656
      Whispering‏ @Anvil161Anvil16
      Replying to @FragrantFrog @CarlaSpade
      Okay, thank you. So you’re ‘casting doubt’ on Murat’s statement yourself? I’m not judging, just want to know. #mccann
      4:30 pm - 6 Dec 2018

      https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1070839797084811264
      Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
      Replying to @Anvil161Anvil16 @CarlaSpade
      Yes. That's not to say he was involved in Madeleine's disappearance in any way but the doubts cast explain why he needed more of an alibi than his mother when made an arguido.
      4:37 pm - 6 Dec 2018

      So, where’s the relevance? None, just to distract from the BRT.

      But, outside the change of clothes, the photo is quite interesting:

      - It shows very clearly that the apartment 2 floors above 5A can be easily perceived as the top floor of the building.

      - It shows the truck that we have said served to unload/load table tops, table-skirts and possibly tablecloths parked in front of the Tapas entrance in the morning of the 4th.

      - It shows that Murat was not actively translating, he seems quite ignored by the PJ who were questioning people at the time.

      - It shows that Stephen Carpenter was not at all times near Robert Murat.

      - It shows Raj Balu looking over a fence, arms resting on it, certainly not searching but controlling things down over Block 5, with no Neil Berry or mystery man to be seen.

      - And it shows what an amazing photo archive the Frog has. Where did she get this picture from? Did she also do a reverse search on this one as well?

      Interesting that the Frog knew that Murat was sweating that morning:

      https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1070833365119590400
      Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
      Replying to @Anvil161Anvil16 @CarlaSpade
      It was cooler first thing (K&G had fleeces on when they left with PJ around 11pm. RM wanted to appear official imo. Maybe he was sweating a lot......
      4:12 pm - 6 Dec 2018

      (they didn’t leave at 11am, they left earlier. The Frog knows that)

      Delete
    3. By the way, bringing into the debate the Jensen sisters was not a very smart thing to do.

      To readers who are not aware, the sisters say they dined at Tapas on the 3rd but their names don't appear in the reservation sheets,and they have used the expression "the 60 of us" to describe the group of people they were there with.

      60? Quite a large group that is not referenced anywhere.

      Delete
    4. No, they are quoted as saying "There were only about 60 of us staying in the apartments and you got to recognise all the other people'', not that they were in a party of 60.

      Also, they were not booked with Mark Warner, thus those tapas sheets, or the restriction on the number of covers, did not apply to them

      Delete
    5. Anonymous 7 Dec 2018, 20:19:00,

      Could you please show where in the PJ Files, or anywhere else, it is said the restrictions on the number of covers were only for the Mark Warner guests.

      Could you please say where the reservations for customers of other operators have their reservations in the files? Or anywhere else? Did Tapas have separate reservation books for each different operator? If so, how many reservations did Thomas Cook customers have?

      You do realise that the Jensen sisters were reserved by Mark Warner, don't you?
      http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/T/03_VOLUME_IIIa_Page_624.jpg

      On a scale of 1 to 10, how much of a fool have you made yourself to be with your comment?

      We'll answer: inversely proportional to what you have helped show how right we are plus as much as you have shown how you people are so desperate that you just resort to making things up.

      Delete
    6. How would you recognise so many people in such a short space of time, unless they all went to the same places and kept meeting up?
      If you go on a holiday flight to a resort, how many people would you recognise at the resort? They probably have flown from different airports, as did the MW guests, arrived at different times and don’t report meeting each other at the Mill.
      Maybe after 2 weeks, you would start to recognise people, but would you be aware you were all with the same holiday company?
      The introductory sessions described don’t account for 60 people. Carpenter only names a few people he met at the introductory meeting.

      Delete
    7. Food for thought:

      Were the Irwin sisters put on the tapas booking sheet in error, when it should have been the Jensen sisters?

      Delete
  35. https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1071303955626582017
    00Bugsy‏ @TheBunnyReturns
    Replying to @DaveHallCoLtd @KTHopkins
    Prime example was when she [Katie Hopkins] latched onto the McCann case, claiming to be some sort of anti McCann, who would reveal so much, then proceeded to tell us Madeleine disappeared because she was "left to be found" She robs a living from a few clicks on Google, and a nose for controversy
    11:22 pm - 7 Dec 2018

    ******

    What is the beef that Mr Thompson has with Katie Hopkins? She, like him, fully supports neglect. Blames, like him, the McCanns for, allegedly, leaving the kids in the apartment (a practice that apparently is very common among the British MSM reporters as stated by his friend Sonia Poulton in a video to which he gave his name to as well). So why is he attacking her?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Comment received from Mr Thompson, which we have censored:

      “Pseudo Nym has left a new comment on your post "Scare tactics":

      "Left to be found" by an abductor, not simply left. You (censored) with your feeble attempts to twist what others say, (censored).

      Posted by Pseudo Nym to Textusa at 8 Dec 2018, 13:34:00”

      *****

      Let’s first address the accusation about twisting what others say:

      Do you, or do you not share with Ms Hopkins that there was negligence?

      Do you, or do you not share with Ms Hopkins that the McCanns are to blame for, allegedly, having left the children alone?

      If you do share, we have not twisted your words.

      In the phrase “left to be found” the key word is “left”. Unless you are able to quote Ms Hopkins having said the McCanns left the children intentionally to have Maddie abducted, the beliefs between you and Ms Hopkins, in terms of negligence, match.

      All those like you who still maintain negligence show abduction is a possibility. So why be so vicious against Ms Hopkins when your opinions on negligence are so similar?

      Delete
    2. Reply from Mr Thompson, which we have censored:

      Pseudo Nym has left a new comment on your post "Scare tactics":

      Like you care, you're exploiting situations yet again. (censored).

      The keywords are actually, "left TO BE FOUND" not left to have an accident - which was the theory of Goncalo Amaral. No wonder he cannot stand you.

      Posted by Pseudo Nym to Textusa at 8 Dec 2018, 17:31:00

      *****

      You are making a very serious accusation against Katie Hopkins, which we believe to be wrongful. You have explicitly said that she has said that the McCanns left Maddie alone specifically so she could be abducted.

      Nothing to do with us, a legal matter between you and Katie Hopkins. We won’t publish anything more on this subject. If you have anything more to say either publish it on twitter or on your paymaster’s blog.

      You saying Mr Amaral can’t stand us, means he loves us. We didn’t know that.

      Delete
    3. By the way, "you're exploiting situations yet again" has been noted Mr "I can assure you that..."

      Delete
  36. We would like to ask if anyone who knows CaroleShooter has heard from her.

    No details needed. We just to know she’s OK.

    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Elaine Strachan has informed me on FB that Carole was fine and is feeling safe having left Twitter.

      Delete
    2. Something you could have found out yourself by messaging Carole. It's obvious why you chose to use the blog though. Being consumed with hatred will only end one way.

      Delete
    3. How can Carole be messaged if she's already left Twitter? When you don't have an account?

      Delete
    4. Why is Ben assuming you were in contact with Carole S on FB?
      You have already said you had no contact with her.
      I see only one person consumed with hatred.

      Delete
    5. Ben assumes lots of sh#t....she is a pompus wee nyaff... better left to her own little devices....prefer if you dont publish anymore of her insudious comments.

      Bampots

      Delete
    6. We have no contact with Carole Shooter, as is known, we don’t use Twitter and we don’t know what her FB profile is.

      Even if we had contact with Carole Shooter, we want it to be known publicly our concerns for her safety. We want to show publicly our support and condemn publicly all those who made her fear for her safety to the point she felt she had to close her account.

      About who is responsible for Carole feeling fear, we trust that people are as able to read as much as we are.

      Delete
    7. Bampots,

      Could you please clarify who is the "she" you are referring to?

      Thank you.

      Delete
    8. To our readers about this latest episode with Mr Thompson.

      We fully understand that it is unpleasant. But even though our opponents have now stepped up things into making them physically personal, we will continue to discuss matters only case related.

      Let’s us be very clear that we are not accusing Mr Thompson or the gang of physical threat to the girl. We believe that came from higher level.

      As readers know, a great deal of the Maddie case is information. Because of this the internet has played a great part in it for 11 years.

      Although the decisions to be made on the case are outside the internet, it’s incontrovertible that it has played a relevant role in shaping opinions about the case.

      We have no polls or any scientific studies back it up but we think that it would be safe to say the majority of people not familiar with the case think the McCanns were neglectful.

      This was achieved by a very successful misinformation campaign that was launched very early on as we showed in our post “The narrative of negligence”:
      http://textusa.blogspot.com/2015/10/the-narrative-of-negligence.html

      “The author describes perfectly the launch of a myth, the NoN. He even tells us who launched it.
      “Madeleine’s uncle Michael Wright” (he was actually Kate’s cousin by marriage to her cousin Anne Marie)

      “The evidence clearly shows that Gerry McCann, far from passing on to his circle only chaotic first impressions or mistaken interpretations of what had happened immediately after the disappearance, quite clearly hammered home certain key information for many hours after the disappearance which he intended them to pass on to the media. Madeleine’s uncle, Michael Wright, made this quite clear on the same day …””

      A year ago, just after Nigel Nessling’s sentence the other side launched a full offensive to conquer the internet and have it mobilised in such a way that in September they would create a general wrath asking for the McCanns’ throats. If failed and it failed miserably.

      However this offensive cost our opponents their exposure. It took us a significant effort to expose those who had for literally years passed as friends of the truth. In fact, of all those on “active duty”, we believe there are none that those paying attention don’t know by now are simply “smooth operators”.

      As readers have come to realise by now, Mr Thompson is one of these. For years he has been the smoothest of all.

      Due to his total lack of shame, him having a dominant role on Justice FB and his Twitter presence, we feel we need to keep on exposing his hypocrisy about the case.

      So, whenever he steps out of line, we will continue to bring over his words, so that history can register appropriately what his role and that of his friends were in the case.

      Thank you for understanding.

      Delete
    9. just gender messing as they do with you...thought it was funny at the time.....

      Bampots

      Delete
    10. Bampots,

      Thank you for clarifying, we thought as much and it was... surprising, thus the need for clarification :)

      About this gender obsession - to the point of slandering Bruce Springsteen by bringing up his name and associating it with swinging for no reason whatsoever - all we have to say is it shows the hypocrisy of our opponents.

      We have been informed by different sources - so quite the open secret - that some close to Mr Thompson are not of the gender they claim to be and he seems to be, as he should be, comfortable with that.

      Most of the bits we have censored from Mr Thompson are related to him calling me a nasty, vindictive and whatever man. We have censored it no because we want to hide it but because we do not wish to feed the unpleasantness, which is the objective why they were written.

      If Mr Thompson thinks he's holding a big card, then we're afraid that he's brought a Tarot card to a game of bridge.

      Delete
    11. I am outraged by Ben Thompson's recent behaviour towards Carole Shooter and Carla Spade, although Carole and Carla aren't the first to experience this and I doubt they will be the last judging by Thompson's track record on social media. When will his supporters finally wake up and disassociate themselves from this troubled individual? Long term followers of the case may recall that Ben Thompson's FB group members were harvested from other groups he'd deliberately disrupted to further his own agenda. He doesn't care about Madeleine and his close connections to certain people near the core of the whole affair are nothing short of shocking.

      Delete
  37. What a laughing stock Thompson has become with his pathetic bully boy tactics against women and his plethora of usernames. This is a guy who claimed he collapsed with pneumonia after reading something that had been posted about him in a forum. He's an absolute joke and the last person anyone should fear.

    ReplyDelete
  38. One interesting fact about the picture the Frog put up to launch the debate – which backfired – about why had Murat changed his clothes on May 4 is Raj Balu on it.

    We have already pointed out in our comment at 7 Dec 2018, 15:11:00 that the picture “shows Raj Balu looking over a fence, arms resting on it, certainly not searching but controlling things down over Block 5, with no Neil Berry or mystery man to be seen.”

    And the interesting fact is why isn’t this picture in the PJ Files?

    It’s clearly a picture taken privately (we have asked why the Frog had this picture…) but there is something on it that it would make it mandatory to have been handed over to the PJ: Raj Balu.

    Nothing against the man, but it is factual that the picture captures a lone male looking attentively over apartment 5A on the morning of the 4th. The photo is not taken from Block 2. Block 2 is across the street from Block 5 (where Raj Balu is standing) and the picture was taken from the top of the building across the streets from Blocks 1 and Block 6.
    http://luzoceanclub.com/content/uploads/LUZ-OCEAN-CLUB-MAP.pdf
    http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/sitebuilderpictures/zzpdlmap.jpg
    https://www.google.com/maps/@37.0888813,-8.7307803,3a,75y,350.12h,89.44t/data=!3m5!1e1!3m3!1sEoGoIHHD4EsxXr6iU1qDCg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DEoGoIHHD4EsxXr6iU1qDCg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D151.88655%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100

    Block 6 is where Raj Balu and Neil Berry were staying. The photo was taken from a building that does not belong to the Ocean Club.

    A girl goes missing and one captures on a photo a man lurking over the apartment from where the girl went missing and one does absolutely nothing.

    The only reason for that photo not to have been of HIGH interest to the case is if whoever took the photo recognised Raj Balu and knew that there was no reason for him to be considered a suspect, so didn’t report him.

    This can only mean that Raj Balu was known to the photographer and the photographer knew that he had nothing to do with Maddie’s disappearance.

    So, Frog’s photo gives us this food for thought: an independent witness takes a photo from a private property completely unrelated to the Ocean Club, captures on it a man alone overlooking the apartment from where Maddie has disappeared, has, supposedly, no way of knowing he’s a guest staying in Block 6 and even it that was known for whatever reason, has, supposedly, no way of knowing that the man in question was not suspicious and that photo ends up, unexpectedly, in the hands of the Frog instead of being part of the PJ Files as would be expected.

    We remind readers of the words from Stephen carpenter about a man, the Greyhairman, who Raj Balu (!!!) on the night of May 3 finds to be suspicious just because the stranger tells him he has bought a block of apartments and those apartments overlook block 5:
    “Hummm.. then it would just a question of asking who he was, where he was and could be eliminated from the list of suspects, becoming one less person to raise concern.”
    http://textusa.blogspot.com/2015/02/all-worlds-stage-23.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Balu and Berry were the only 2 people, apart from T9 and officers/forensic staff, to be swabbed for evidence, neither were known to have entered 5a prior to or after the event.
      Although the DNA results for both men did not implicate them in any way, that wasn’t known when the photo was taken.
      It’s not uncommon for perpetrators to return to the scene of a crime to observe the activities of the police and even offer their assistance.
      That photo could have been an important piece of evidence.
      How many photos were sent to CEOP rather than the PJ? That should never have happened as it was interfering with the PJ investigation by intercepting evidence which should have been sent directly to the PJ.

      Delete
    2. It was Jim Gamble who interfered with PJ evidence by not sending photos onto them. It wasn't the first or last time for him in particular to meddle in this case.

      Delete
  39. @Anvil161Anvil16
    Replying to @McCannCaseTweet @PJudiciaria and 2 others

    And where would we be without you and your insider knowledge?? Oh my... #mccann

    I agree with "Whispering" here. 5 long years McFadden has been on #mccann, always hinting she has inside information from her high status contacts. What has she brought us in terms of news? Absolutely nothing and yet still her followers are enthralled. They are so naive is they can't see that everything she tweets is just to big herself up. Currently tweeting really old pictures of herself on the hashtag, to make sure everyone knows she has (or once had)a glamorous lifestyle. Totally irrelevant to Madeleine, but never gets pulled on it by the gang.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unpublished Anonymous at 9 Dec 2018, 23:32:00

      We are not publishing your comment because you are making, although you are being logical and perfectly reasonable, a baseless accusation.

      It’s reasonable because we, like you, believe (no need to be a genius to come to this conclusion) that the gang is in contact with each other through various private chat rooms, so the “individual” output in the respective social media is coordinated.

      Where we disagree with you is where you say one controls what another is to say. When there are people involved who are unhinged and who have a profound need to call for attention, then the individuality always surfaces no matter how much discipline their higher echelon tries to impose.

      Delete
    2. So readers know the context:

      https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1071826544773947392
      Madeleine CaseTweets🌐‏ @McCannCaseTweet
      Did I tell you all yet on #mccann? Last week I briefly spoke to @PJudiciaria Portimao..
      Judiciaria has NOT made any statement about a last lead of MADELEINE WALKING OUT ALONE.
      It is FAKE NEWS!!#MadeleineMccann
      @metpoliceuk told me same last month..Theories not coming from MET
      9:58 AM - 9 Dec 2018

      *****
      https://twitter.com/Anvil161Anvil16/status/1071886906189905920
      Whispering‏ @Anvil161Anvil16
      Replying to @McCannCaseTweet @PJudiciaria and
      And where would we be without you and your insider knowledge?? Oh my... #mccann
      1:58 PM - 9 Dec 2018

      Delete
    3. https://twitter.com/jeremy74106668/status/1071905779559600129
      jeremy‏ @jeremy74106668
      Replying to @McCannCaseTweet @Anvil161Anvil16
      Ok, the @McCannCaseTweet has officially lost her mind. Was once an interesting follow on here, now,obsessive and belligerent nonesense on a daily bases.
      3:13 PM - 9 Dec 2018

      Delete
    4. Isabelle McFadden by her own admission is in daily contact with Ben Thompson who feeds her information. She not only coordinates responses to tweets, but she also cooordinates responses to her own tweets. Some Twitter users have proof of this in screenshots from her private chatrooms where a smear campaign against this blog was also coordinated.

      Delete
    5. Ben's carefully crafted characters and his interactions with himself are like listening to episodes of The Archers.

      Delete
  40. Did anyone else notice MichelleS/Silverdoe trying to stop Carla talking about Carole Shooter? The gang wants to pretend that it had nothing to do with Carole leaving Twitter. Unbelievable!

    ReplyDelete
  41. https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1071905668192456704
    00The Jules... 🕵️‍♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸‏ @jules1602x
    Carla claims Madeleine is dead...How did that happen if the children were well looked after.. She's not thought it through has she... #McCann
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuAshCFXcAAw6aL.jpg
    3:13 pm - 9 Dec 2018

    [Picture attached says the folloing:
    “Carla Spade
    @CarlaSpade
    You take the kids along so it looks to others, unaware of your lifestyle choice, like you’re going on a family holiday.
    Mark Warner brought in loads of extra nannies after the children while the adults enjoyed “adult time”. The children were well looked after.”]

    *****

    Stupidity has indeed no limits.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1071908112368570369
      Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
      Replying to @jules1602x
      No, Carla doesn't think things through logically. Carla hasn't checked how many nannies there were in relation to the number of children on MW guest list. Carla can't explain why some nannies were in the pub, neglecting their alleged charges....
      3:23 pm - 9 Dec 2018

      *****

      Based on what has the Frog based this vile charge against the nannies?

      Jules has liked this tweet. Will NT approve?

      And to the “hasn't checked how many nannies there were in relation to the number of children on MW guest list”, we have and it will make a VERY INTERESTING post.

      Delete
  42. https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1071908673595891713
    Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
    Replying to @CarlaSpade
    I think I'm more of a truth-seeker than any anti, Carla and I can 100% say that no table tops were brought in for any VIP party. You're welcome. The photo [the posh esplanade photo] is fascinating on more than one level. #mccann
    3:25 PM - 9 Dec 2018

    *****

    Besides being in denial when shown a wooden round top that has been clearly brought in, what we would like to call the attention to in this tweet is the 100% certainty the Frog alleges to have about happened in the Tapas esplanade that day.

    How can she say she’s that certain? Or better said, what qualifies her to allege to have that certainty?

    ReplyDelete
  43. https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1071894652578459648
    Madeleine CaseTweets🌐‏ @McCannCaseTweet
    Replying to @Anvil161Anvil16
    Exactly!!! Let’s get back to swingers ... in these pictures at a Santa Monica, Los Angeles party there are 2 clues two are famous actors but only one is a swinger?
    As the expert on swinging on #mccann Anvil, can you SPOT the swinger?
    Are all the Tapas swingers or just a few?
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuAigPZU4AA5sY6.jpg
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuAigPbV4AAPr_R.jpg
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuAigPcVsAALxjh.jpg
    2:29 PM - 9 Dec 2018

    *****

    1. We don’t see any famous actors in the pictures, only Isabelle McFadden trying to promote herself.

    2. She is admitting to be very familiar with swinging in the Santa Monica, Los Angeles area. We don’t know of any actor/actress who has come out recognising they were swingers.

    3. Proves our point: swingers are respectable people like the rest of us who, if it wasn’t for hypocrisy of society, shouldn’t be felt they needed to hide their alternative lifestyle. Unfortunately, reality determines otherwise.

    4. We don’t want to know who the swingers in the pictures are, nor do we care.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The smokescreen known as Isabelle McFadden is actually a far cleverer ploy than Ben Thompson and all his different usernames and I would urge anyone reading this to think about that very carefully.

      Delete
  44. https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1071897031688343553
    Madeleine CaseTweets🌐‏ @McCannCaseTweet
    Replying to @Anvil161Anvil16
    Phone a friend..hello it’s me. Up for swinging 😂😂😂? #mccann
    There wasn’t any swinging Anvil, come on sweetie..
    So Mrs Fenn and all those retired people were living in a swingers resort?
    You are so fun but you know the swinging theory is silly
    2:39 PM - 9 Dec 2018

    *****

    Didn’t Mrs Fenn live in her own apartment?

    Does the Ocean Club represent the entire Praia da Luz?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why are some people so desperate to undermine the swinging theory? It's not an illegal activity, but I assume it would tarnish the reputations of doctors somewhat, so perhaps that is the reason.

      Delete
  45. https://twitter.com/The_Truth_II/status/1072067713856622593
    The Ponce of Dubai‏ @The_Truth_II
    Replying to @CarlaSpade @PollyGraph69 and 2 others
    tables or swinging 2 very boring topics that some seem determined to highlight & dominate all talk on #mccann there are 11k pages of the police files thousands of things that can be discussed
    1:57 am - 10 Dec 2018

    *****

    Another one trying his best to make the debate around the tables (only means the Ocean Club staff lied) and swinging (only gives a motive for the hoax) in the Maddie case to be boring. Basically asking people to stop talking about them.

    If he finds the topics so boring, why not just stay away from them and let people who find them interesting debate them?

    If he has “11k pages of the police files thousands of things that can be discussed” why is he not discussing them? No one is stopping him, is there?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://twitter.com/The_Truth_II/status/1072060739098169344
      The Ponce of Dubai‏ @The_Truth_II
      Replying to @PollyGraph69 @CarlaSpade and 3 others
      Debbie I have no problem with your theories which are as valid as anyone else’s swingers doggers group orgies what was really going on during these group holidays is anyone’s guess, the group was a weird bunch
      1:29 am - 10 Dec 2018

      *****

      Notice the subtlety? Putting swingers and doggers as the same.

      Something NT has also tried to convey as equivalent, like we said in our comment at 15 Aug 2018, 19:31:00, in our post “The help and the tennis - comments continue VII”:
      http://textusa.blogspot.com/2018/08/the-help-and-tennis-comments-continue.html

      “Please note how these places enforce strict rules. Very strict rules. Comparing swinging with dogging like NT has tried, is indeed comparing Chablis and lobster with warm tap water on a sunny day and 4 day old stale bread.”

      Delete
  46. The person behind the Ponce account is actually very fragile and often quite fearful, which makes this particular individual easy for others behind the scenes to manipulate, especially as they are well aware that this person seeks to impress them.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Silverdoe is currently blowing her stack on Twitter because she knows her and her cronies are gradually being exposed on this blog for what they really are.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072107673733251076
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      Says the person trying to shut down any debate anyone else has on #mccann Swinging is a THEORY - NOT a fact, deal with it. I am SUSPICIOUS of others trying to shut people up and belittle them and place doubt on them because they don't agree, give it a rest you have a THEORY.🙄
      4:36 am - 10 Dec 2018

      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072108682991812608
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      Replying to @PollyGraph69 @CarlaSpade and 3 others
      But if that makes me and others pretendy for NOT bowing down to the swinging theory? GOOD. All of my friends have been bullied enough - A theory is not a fact, there's withheld files still to be revealed, now I'm getting annoyed with this constant back bitching #mccann
      4:40 am - 10 Dec 2018

      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072109506153381890
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx @PollyGraph69 and 4 others
      Who doesn't care about Madeleine are the ones who try to shut others up over their THEORIES - THAT'S the truth. I'll start blocking if this carries on enough is a bloody enough, Ponce is right, why should the swinging take precedence over everything else with the case? #mccann
      4:43 am - 10 Dec 2018

      https://twitter.com/Irissykes14/status/1072109836320563200
      Iris sykes‏ @Irissykes14
      Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx
      The swinging theory plus the brt saga is boring repetitive crap,Needs to end Michelle,Will They never learn?
      4:44 am - 10 Dec 2018

      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072110137018585090
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      Replying to @Irissykes14
      No Iris because their voices apparently are the only ones who counts. I'm totally sick of it, look at the tag how it's been cause of them as it is? I didn't want to loose my temper, I bloody have now!
      4:45 am - 10 Dec 2018

      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072110499704262656
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      Replying to @PollyGraph69 @CarlaSpade and 3 others
      GOOD voices have now gone from the tag thanks to this swinging and placing doubt on others crap, there's many aspects to this case and many theories, it's wrong! I am sick of the BRT and swinging dominating and pushing others out. Now ganging up on others to push it? So wrong!
      4:47 am - 10 Dec 2018

      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072111695605186561
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      Replying to @Irissykes14
      I'm getting there Iris, it's become ridiculous now. We all have theories and ideas etc, but to go to the lengths they're going to? It's so wrong, it is boring but it's getting beyond forcing the agenda onto others.
      4:52 am - 10 Dec 2018

      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072112820282683392
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      Replying to @Irissykes14
      I don't think the swinging crowd get that Iris - To them their opinions are facts, our opinions mean nothing....
      4:56 am - 10 Dec 2018

      *****

      Hmmmm… who is trying to push who out?

      Delete
    2. I didn’t see any of the above tweeters jumping up and down with condemnation when BT was belittling and ridiculing Lizzy HDH .
      Short memories

      Delete
  48. From "FB Anon":

    "I've just seen this on twittering a reply to Jules:
    "GreenLeaper@FragrantFrog 14 hours ago No, Carla doesn't think things through logically. Carla hasn't checked how many nannies there were in relation to the number of children on MW guest list. Carla can't explain why some nannies were in the pub, neglecting their alleged charges...."

    I thought this was interesting as I've never heard anyone accusing the nannies of neglect before. If it's true that the nannies were in the pub instead of looking after children, how does the Frog know? This tweet only got 1 like - from Jules......"

    *****

    FB Anon,

    Please see our reply at 10 Dec 2018, 09:59:00. Quite the accusation!

    ReplyDelete

  49. https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072121053567176704
    xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
    Replying to @JonnyLons81 @PollyGraph69 and 4 others
    Well Jonny, that's logical for it to be, the PJ's views were death by accident due to sedation - Getting up in a dazed state looking for daddy, they had enough evidence to support their thesis, it was either dark or panic enough to show some form sadly perhaps of abuse IMO.
    5:29 am - 10 Dec 2018

    *****

    To someone who is so demanding about others providing fact, please quote the PJ Files or even Mr Amaral’s book where it’s said “death by accident due to sedation”.

    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. and what's the 'sadly perhaps of abuse IMO' - there's two unfounded theories rolled into one!

      Delete
    2. Death by accident when sedated and possible abuse.

      If T7 covered up abuse, it suggests they were also a group who abused or condoned abuse and sedation.
      The Oldfields, not having an alleged monitor, as Paynes and Tanner claimed, must also have been sedating their child, if this theory is taken to its logical conclusion.
      So baying for more than the McCanns’ blood or not?
      What sort of abuse is alleged?

      Delete
    3. Silverdoe has replied with the following 2 tweets:

      Tweet #1:

      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072147430366416897
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      However, seeing as there's been so much nonsense and you'll ss my comments as it suits, the PJ DID suspect such suspect sedation - Where did I lie with that conclusion? More evidence towards that than swinging alone dear IMO of course.... 😉#mccann
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuEIUIYWsAUIozJ.jpg
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuEIVmcWoAAYhgZ.jpg
      7:14 AM - 10 Dec 2018

      Picture 1:
      “Gonçalo Amaral: Gerry McCann hid Madeleine corpse in the Beach - El Mundo Interview
      By Silvia Taulés
      > The apartment window stayed always shut in spite of what Kate McCann said
      > The girl might have fallen from the sofa: there could have been an accident because of the sleeping solution
      Goncalo Amaral in a moment of the interview (Photo: Bernabé Cordón)
      Madrid - He arrives late, with a certain' star' look. His book (Esquilo, 2008), which will be officially presented on the 9 of September, has sold 120.000 copies in two weeks, a record in Portugal.
      This, once begun, was unstoppable. Gonçalo Amaral, the visible head of an investigation that had thousands of people in suspense, tells why he remains insistent that was Madeleine's parents, Kate and Gerry, who were responsible for her disappearance.
      Question - You defend the theory that the parents are guilty of what happened to Madeleine McCann.
      Answer - No. That is not in the book.
      Q - However that is the theory that one can understand from reading it.”

      Picture 2:
      “From Service information from Ricardo Paiva to Goncalo Amaralom Ricardo Paivafrom Ricardo Paiva
      Strangely, Kate also made several requests, three months after the disappearance of Madeleine, that the police should take blood, hair and nail tests of Madeleine's twin siblings, because, as she said, she remembered that on the day of Madeleine's disappearance, in spite of all the commotion and noise made by the authorities and other persons who were looking for Madeleine in apartment 5A of the Ocean Club, the twins never woke up, having been transported to another apartment, they remained asleep, due to which she now presumes that they were under the effect of some sedative drug that a presumed abductor had administered to the three children in order to be able to abduct Madeleine, a situation which Kate refers to being possible according to what she read in a criminal investigation manual given to her by the British authorities, that would have been the procedure of the abductor in the real case involving abduction, rape and murder of the girl.”

      *****

      From picture 1 Silverdoe believes in an interpretation by Silvia Taulés because the words “The girl might have fallen from the sofa: there could have been an accident because of the sleeping solution” are hers and not from Mr Amaral.

      Then, since she believes every word this article says, she must also believe that Mr Amaral does NOT defend the theory that the parents are guilty of what happened to Madeleine McCann.

      This is true, as far as we know he has only accused them publicly of concealment of the body and obstruction of justice. So, Silverdoe, if the parents didn’t sedate Maddie, who did?

      If sedation and not by parents, then your theory seems to be that someone outside the family sedated her and she ended up having an accident because of that sedation. Is that it?

      Note, nothing of this is in the files. In fact the PJ final report does not mention sedation at all.

      From picture 2, Silverdoe joins the Tony Bennett and Blacksmith club: what Kate McCann says is true. This bit, by the way, is in the files:
      http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/SERVICE_INFORMATION.htm#p10p2533-2534

      So, if sedation was the reason for her death, it’s obvious that Kate the blabbermouth would be telling the police that her 3 kids, including Maddie had been sedated. Really?

      And now, Silverdoe believes in the absurd theory that the abductor sedated Maddie. Not even NT tries to push that one!

      Delete
    4. Tweet #2:

      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072148514900230144
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx �� �� ��️ ��️ ��‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      http://goncaloamaraltruthofthelie.blogspot.com/2009/06/true-victim-is-missing-child.html
      …and a link, aren't I kind? #mccann enjoy
      7:18 am - 10 Dec 2018

      The link takes us to the translation of Chapter 4 of Mr Amaral’s book.

      The relevant passage in Portuguese:

      “Madeleine dorme mal
      Durante uma deslocação a Inglaterra do pai de Madeleine, em Julho de 2007, um colega da polícia inglesa visitou-o em casa. Colado no frigorífico viu um quadro onde eram assinalados os problemas de Madeleine. Constatou que a criança tinha dificuldades em dormir, levantando-se várias vezes durante a noite. O avô paterno chegou a declarar que a mãe de Madeleine dava às crianças um medicamento denominado Calpol, para ajudar os filhos a dormir. Este medicamento é comummente ministrado às crianças inglesas, falando-se até de uma geração Calpol. Ao longo dos últimos anos tem-se discutido se este contém ou não um anti-histaminico cujo efeito é manifestamente sedativo. Certo é que esse efeito era a razão para o uso do Calpol em Inglaterra. Recentemente, este laboratório lançou um novo medicamento, o Calpol Night, em que o anti-histamínico está assumidamente presente. Na altura, especialistas afirmaram que aquele medicamento funcionava como um sedativo. A mãe chegou a admitir que trouxe tal medicamento de Inglaterra, mas que este não teria efeito sedante, tratando-se apenas de um paracetamol (1), e que não teria chegado a administrá-lo aos filhos nestas férias. No momento do desaparecimento de Madeleine, esta dormiria no quarto com os irmãos gémeos. Estes, apesar do barulho, dos gritos da mãe e das visitas ao seu quarto, nunca acordaram. Esta situação pode ser interpretada como encontrando-se as crianças sob o efeito de um qualquer sedativo. Esta dificuldade em dormir pode ter desencadeado o fim trágico de Madeleine.
      (1) Substância active”

      (Cont)

      Delete
    5. (Cont)

      Translated by us:
      “Madeleine sleeps badly
      During a visit to England by Madeleine's father in July 2007, a British police colleague visited him at home. Glued to the refrigerator, he saw a chart on which Madeleine's problems were signalled. He found that the child had difficulty in sleeping, getting up several times during the night. The paternal grandfather went as far as to declare that Madeleine's mother gave the children a medicine called Calpol to help their children sleep. This medicine is commonly given to English children, even there being talked of a Calpol generation. Over the last few years it has been discussed whether or not it contains an antihistamine whose effect is manifestly sedative. Certain is that this effect was the reason for the use of Calpol in England. Recently, this lab has launched a new drug, Calpol Night, in which the antihistamine is admittedly present. At the time, experts said that the drug worked as a sedative. The mother came to admit that she had brought such medicine from England, but that it would not have a sedative effect, as it was only a paracetamol (1) and would not have gotten to administering it to her children on this holiday. At the time of Madeleine's disappearance, she would be sleeping in the bedroom with the twin brothers. These, despite the noise, the cries of the mother and the visits to their room, never woke up. This situation can be interpreted as the children being under the effect of any sedative. This difficulty in sleeping may have triggered the tragic end of Madeleine.
      (1) Active substance”

      *****

      Silverdoe,

      Please tell us where in the passage above invalidates the following scenario (in which we don’t believe ourselves just raising it as a possibility from Mr Amaral’s words above):

      The twins were sedated but Maddie was not, for whatever reason. Because she had sleeping problems and because she was NOT sedated, she woke up, wandered off to the living room and fell off the couch like Mr Amaral has proposed in his book”

      In this scenario, “this difficulty in sleeping may have triggered the tragic end of Madeleine”. For us, what he’s implying is that Maddie should have been sedated and wasn’t, and that was the parents crucial mistake. But, as we said, he’s implying, not stating as fact.

      Again, this is not in the files. You base your theory on a single sentence from Mr Amaral's book that could have the opposite interpretation you gave it, which in our opinion is the most likely one.

      If Mr Amaral really thought that Maddie had died because of over-sedation, wouldn’t you think he would give it a greater emphasis in the book and the sedation be reflected in the final report?

      Delete
    6. Silverdoe,

      About your “more evidence towards that than swinging alone dear IMO of course”.

      To support your theory, from the files you have shown a statement from Kate and outside it you have shown one phrase from Mr Amaral’s book that probably means the opposite of what you say it means.

      About swinging, and just about what is in the files, are you aware that the word “swing” was forensically searched in ALL computers seized by the PJ?

      And that of the diligence by the PJ to St Phunurius, where locals said there were sex-parties?

      And before you say that Mr Amaral doesn’t mention swinging in his book, he doesn’t. But the difference between sedation and swinging is that with sedation, it’s about how Maddie died, so expected to be of relevance in his book, while swinging had absolutely nothing to do with Maddie’s death but with the reason of the hoax and that is not explored by him in his book.

      Delete
    7. Silverdoe has replied, again with 2 tweets.

      Tweet #1:

      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072209367922081792
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      Unless you're chief theorist out to cause destruction, this WILL be my last reply, jog on and get lost, you've done enough damage (Even though you're not on twitter) Goncalo knows more than YOU I trust HIM, tough, you're a vile person who tries to belittle - We're DONE :) #mccann
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuFAUHJW0AAzhVL.jpg
      11:20 am - 10 Dec 2018

      Siverdoe attached to this tweet the picture #1 she did in her tweet:
      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072147430366416897

      Here we have to apologise in the transcription of the picture attached to Siverdoe’s tweet in our comment at 10 Dec 2018, 18:22:00. For some reason we didn’t put the last paragraph. Here is the full transcription:

      “Gonçalo Amaral: Gerry McCann hid Madeleine corpse in the Beach - El Mundo Interview
      By Silvia Taulés
      > The apartment window stayed always shut in spite of what Kate McCann said
      > The girl might have fallen from the sofa: there could have been an accident because of the sleeping solution
      Goncalo Amaral in a moment of the interview (Photo: Bernabé Cordón)
      Madrid - He arrives late, with a certain' star' look. His book (Esquilo, 2008), which will be officially presented on the 9 of September, has sold 120.000 copies in two weeks, a record in Portugal.
      This, once begun, was unstoppable. Gonçalo Amaral, the visible head of an investigation that had thousands of people in suspense, tells why he remains insistent that was Madeleine's parents, Kate and Gerry, who were responsible for her disappearance.
      Question - You defend the theory that the parents are guilty of what happened to Madeleine McCann.
      Answer - No. That is not in the book.
      Q - However that is the theory that one can understand from reading it.
      A – From the synopsis you also obtain the same conclusions of the book”.”

      *****

      To be clear, we forgot to add only this “A – From the synopsis you also obtain the same conclusions of the book.”

      So, the reporter asks, do you blame the parents? Mr Amaral replies, no. Reporter insists, but your book says that. Mr Amaral responds, no, if you read the synopsis it doesn’t.

      We see no reason to alter anything we have said above.

      Tweet #2:

      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072214986443890689
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      Can someone search on my Timeline and see where the mad swinging bint thinks I've EVER stated that the "Abductor" sedated Madeleine? It would be most appreciated otherwise, lies upon lies are being told and that's not nice and shows, only LIARS have to LIE, thanks 😊😊#mccann
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuFFz3gXQAAdEzk.jpg
      11:42 am - 10 Dec 2018

      [Attached, in the picture the following:
      “including Maddie had been sedated. Really?

      And now, Silverdoe believes in the absurd theory that the abductor sedated Maddie. Not even NT tries to push that one!”]

      (interesting that Silverdoe above redacted this from what we wrote: “So, if sedation was the reason for her death, it’s obvious that Kate the blabbermouth would be telling the police that her 3 kids,…”)

      *****

      From picture #2 from this tweet from you:
      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072147430366416897

      “due to which she [Kate McCann] now presumes that they were under the effect of some SEDATIVE DRUG that A PRESUMED ABDUCTOR had administered to THE THREE CHILDREN in order to be able to abduct Madeleine”

      You used that paragraph to prove your point that Maddie was sedated, so you must believe in the words therein. Or don’t you?

      The words therein say the abductor was the one who drugged Maddie. The words therein that you believe in.

      Delete
    8. Siverdoe has replied:

      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072264233281355776
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      Replying to @ZaneZeleti
      Zane now they're saying because I used that then I do, they're warped - I'm not going to play their games, I support Amaral and Madeleine - In plenty of interviews Amaral said about sedation, but by their "Logic" I now believe in "Abduction" Zane and sedation by one crazy #mccann

      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuFyQPjWkAYze7Q.jpg
      2:58 pm - 10 Dec 2018

      [In the picture attached:
      “On 24 July 2008, the defendant Dr Goncalo Amaral first published his book, through publishers Guerra e Paz.
      In that book, Dr Amaral put forward the following hypothesis:
      - That the child Madeleine McCann died in the Ocean Club apartment G5A in Vila da Luz, on the evening of 3 May 2007
      - That the McCanns and their friends fabricated an abduction
      - That Dr Kate Healy and Dr Gerald McCann are suspected of involvement in the concealment of their daughter's body
      - That the death may have been the outcome of a tragic accident
      - That there are indications of neglect of the care and safety of the children.
      Dr Amaral's book was published in four editions by the end of July, a further nine by the end of August, and another 12 by end of September. Each edition was of around 10,000 copies.
      [Thus, in all, around 250,000 copies were printed]. At the time of our decision, the book had
      Been sold out at practically all points of sale.”]

      *****

      Silverdoe,

      Please quote from the above where is this “death by accident due to sedation” of yours that you stated clearly in this tweet:
      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072121053567176704

      That has been the point of this exercise, a point to which you haven’t answered.

      The paragraph you quoted from the files is Kate McCann’s belief, not one from the PJ.

      And yet you continue to insist:

      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072267067280318465
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx🔎🧐👁️‍🗨️💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      Replying to @may_shazzy @ZaneZeleti
      And the PJ Did suspect sedation, this is what that swingers lot have done to others for months, I'm going to ignore, they're not worth it, I know who's side I'm on I need not prove a damn thing to those crazies
      3:09 PM - 10 Dec 2018

      Delete
    9. To close our part in this “death by accident due to sedation” debate:

      https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072438033901854720
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      Replying to @EricaCantona7
      How you've all put up with it for so long is beyond me - If I am wrong about the sedation I am wrong, but I know Amaral said he and the PJ suspected it, but because it was just a hypothesis they couldn't actually say it so to speak and that's why he only hinted it in his book.
      2:28 am - 11 Dec 2018

      *****

      So some can say things based on hints, nudges and a vague hypothesis while at the same time demanding from others that they provide absolute proof of something they know is done in a manner that there is no trace, under the penalty of being bonkers.

      When we show them where on the files is swinging and sex parties, mentioned clearly, explicitly with no hints, no nudges, they sulk and say nothing. Why?

      It was important that we dealt with this sedation issue before it became “fashionable”. Because that’s what the Lick-Spittle gang latest try is: to make people think it was sedation.

      Basically, a couple of doctors who couldn’t get out of a sedation problem but could only move the literally the entire British establishment to cover-up for them about something they weren’t able to do it themselves.

      As an example, because they were scared that the social services were going to take their kids away, they went and told (not asked) who controls the social services to engage in a shameful cover-up instead of going to the exact same people and telling (not asking) them to tell the social services to keep away from them!

      The simultaneously super-weak and super-powerful McCanns! Really strange people who can do all but couldn’t get out of a sedation situation. The powerless who were able to muster whoever they needed to cover-up for what could have been easily contained as a domestic accident.

      Delete
  50. Unpublished Anonymous at 10 Dec 2018, 16:45:00

    Thank you for the information but we will always respect the anonymity of others. :)

    ReplyDelete
  51. Have readers noticed how the 2 people who said they found the topic of swinging to be extremely boring got all so worked up?

    It seems it's not boring at all!

    ReplyDelete
  52. The Frog really doesn’t want people to know the picture was taken from the building that is not part of the Ocean Club:

    https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1072279618693054464
    Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
    Replying to @CarlaSpade @ditsy_chick and 3 others
    I will find it [picture of the laundry van] when I can. There's a also a pic of that truck outside Tapas on 4th somewhere on a video so I will try to find that too. My 2nd lovely pic was definitely taken from level 3 end apt of Block 2. #mccann
    3:59 pm - 10 Dec 2018

    https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1072283142604640256
    Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
    Replying to @CarlaSpade @ditsy_chick and 3 others
    It was definitely taken from Block 2, far balcony. If you google aerial Block 2 & look for the protruding balcony, the 2 curved walls & the position of the swimming pool it's clear the pic was not taken from Cristaluz. #mccann
    4:13 pm - 10 Dec 2018

    https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1072296813787578369
    Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
    Replying to @CarlaSpade @ditsy_chick and 3 others
    Then why isn't more of Block 2 swimming pool in the pic if it was taken from Cristaluz? Must have been a heck of a wide angle see through trees type of lens.
    5:07 pm - 10 Dec 2018

    https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1072309540069273600
    Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
    Replying to @CarlaSpade @ditsy_chick and 3 others
    How can you incorporate those balconies & part of the pool in any shot from under red arrow in Cristaluz?
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuGbRbLWoAE9moM.jpg
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuGbd5wXgAA-kpU.jpg
    5:58 pm - 10 Dec 2018

    *****

    Thanks to the Frog, we now know the building is called Cristaluz. The knowledge that the Frog has of Luz and what happened there that week never ceases to amaze us.

    Evidently, the picture was taken from the middle of the terrace of the Cristaluz building. She knows how easy it is to determine as just an intersection of a couple of lines show that.

    This can only mean that someone is not happy that this photo surfaced.

    And confirms that the photo was not handed over to the PJ as they only have a copy of it NOW:

    https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1071912963542564864
    Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
    Replying to @Anvil161Anvil16 @CarlaSpade
    I assume the PJ now have a copy of the photo.
    3:42 pm - 9 Dec 2018

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We have now added a Post Scriptum to this post, which shows clearly that the photo was taken from the top of the Cristaluz building:
      https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-c4FkJoiMtrA/XA_MKZbUciI/AAAAAAAARFo/Y-iMQwNWv6QKZ7CQjuEQwqQzlp4OSqKUwCLcBGAs/s400/Cristaluz.jpg

      Delete
  53. This was DE F's comment we are referring to:

    DE F29 November 2018 at 14:11
    Ah, but the reason they did all those reconstructions they will keep to themselves. I rather think that if they didn't, they may well receive a visit from Nurse Ratched with strait-jackets and taken for some frontal lobotomising.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Just to remind readers: DE F29 November 2018 at 14:11
    Ah, but the reason they did all those reconstructions they will keep to themselves. I rather think that if they didn't, they may well receive a visit from Nurse Ratched with strait-jackets and taken for some frontal lobotomising.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 11 Dec 2018, 14:27:00,

      Thank you, comments crossed.

      Delete
  55. So that readers know, this is what DE F said in his/her comment:

    “In my opinion, and having viewed the image, Google Earth and other sites, I believe the photographer was ion the top right apartment (with ones back to the OC) of Coraluz, which is the apartment block next to Edificia Cristaluz.”

    Unsurprisingly this NT supporter comes here, after his heinous comment, to support the Frog by trying to misinform readers by trying to convince that the photo published by the Frog was taken from Block 2.

    Uses the same “pool argument” but forgets that if the picture captures the curve of the balcony it has to be taken outside that same building.

    Coraluz is Block 2:
    https://www.letsletalgarve.com/villas/p9199
    https://www.google.com/search?q=coraluz+praia+da+luz&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiepb3XhJjfAhUO6RoKHaRjC94Q_AUIDygC&biw=1366&bih=654

    Interesting that DE F is, like the Frog, also very familiar with the names of buildings in Praia da Luz.

    It seems that the FACT that fact that this photo that was taken from a building that is not part of the Ocean Club is worrying people.

    ReplyDelete
  56. We will analyse later all the arguments that have been presented lately by those opposing the swinging theory. However we could not resist to publish this one because it does take the cake:

    https://twitter.com/The_Truth_II/status/1072477437466959872
    The Ponce of Dubai‏ @The_Truth_II
    Replying to @JillWillybach @PollyGraph69 and 2 others
    If they were there for adult fun where were the clothes? This has nothing to do with a child who never came home.
    5:05 am - 11 Dec 2018

    https://twitter.com/The_Truth_II/status/1072478412093222913
    The Ponce of Dubai‏ @The_Truth_II
    Replying to @PollyGraph69 @CarlaSpade and 2 others
    VIP? So Diane Webster was fucking vips? Do you honestly believe at this type of event you say was happening Kate turned up in those awful baggy cadaver pants & sported that braless Tshirt look?
    5:09 am - 11 Dec 2018

    *****

    So, no swinging because they were not wearing swinging clothes.

    But, then, no paedophilia because they weren’t wearing paedophilia clothes. And no sedation. Why? Because they weren’t wearing sedation clothes!

    Hmmm… “at this type of event you say was happening”… what type? Ponce of Dubai seems to be quite familiar with these “types of events”…

    And it’s evident that Kate McCann couldn’t possibly be swinging because if she had been, it would be evident that she would be wearing leather and a cat-mask after her daughter went missing and certainly not be caught in “awful baggy cadaver pants & sported that braless Tshirt look”!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And now we are certain that the Ponce of Dubai will agree with what we said in this post:
      http://textusa.blogspot.com/2011/02/tad-too-posh.html

      Delete
  57. Ha ha, you too have audacity. You are effectively stalkers of the internet and your potty mouth needs washing out. You & your team are stealing oxygen that should be destined for worthy human beings. You ought to be thoroughly ashamed of your efforts to push, nay FORCE, your wayward and unsubstantiated theories on the true crusaders of truth for MBM.

    ReplyDelete
  58. @McCannCaseTweet
    6h6 hours ago

    Of course we make fun of Text USA in private group... there’s a missing baby and text USA goes on day in/ day out about McCanns being wild swingers in Portugal

    So what? I don’t like your theories..Move On

    I don’t demand you follow me, my theories follow the #mccann police files

    You do more than make fun in private, love. You manipulate other tweeters to do your dirty work, like you just got Silverdoe to tweet about a "Nuala" on the phone logs. We know what you are doing.

    ReplyDelete
  59. @Tealtraum
    @FragrantFrog @DesireeLWiggin1 and

    Grab a hammer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9OBalX__Yg …

    No shame in being associated with you. You're far above supposed compatriots. #McCann sing it. Frog is good people, not the devil.

    Ben Salmon singing the praises of the Frog. Tweet liked by Silverdoe. Disgusting people.

    ReplyDelete
  60. And McFadden has unblocked Frog to get in on the Frog love-in action.

    ReplyDelete
  61. @Tealtraum

    Dear Carla. You weren't doxxed. No personal info came out. No home address. No city or town. No phone # that I saw. No real name or personal information. Just the name of another alias. Relax. PS. You inanely labelled me, so my reply here breaks no personal promises :) xx #McCann
    0 replies 1 retweet 2 likes

    Oh dear! Does he realise what he has said here? If they haven't been doxxing her, how are they able to say that Nuala isn't her real name?

    ReplyDelete
  62. At least we now know that Salmon is in McFadden & Thompson's "secret group" where they coordinate their nastiness against those who want justice for Madeleine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1072829116653727746
      00Bugsy‏ @TheBunnyReturns
      Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx @mccannscamexpos
      Textusa is allowing "anon" pros on their blog to cause trouble and post totally untrue allegations. They get off on lying and encouraging others to do the same. I am in no secret groups, I am not in touch with Isabelle daily, and have never told anybody what to tweet.
      4:22 am - 12 Dec 2018

      *****

      Mr Thompson has just confirmed all that he’s accused of.

      He’s like one of the men in the lying riddle, the one who simply cannot tell the truth:
      http://textusa.blogspot.com/2010/05/lying-riddle.html

      Delete
  63. Inez is back on #mccann and the rest has done her the world of good. She is standing up for herself & others like never before. I have always liked her tweets but have been uncomfortable with her association with some of the worst bullies on the tag. Sonia Poulton is a known disruptor on the #CSA tag, supporting fakes and attacking genuine victims, so what else could we expect from Bugsy, her sidekick on #mccann? It's good to see Inez distance herself from people like this.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Not even sure it's relevant but there's an aerial picture that looks as though it was taken around a similar time as Frogs picture given the amount of vehicles and people at the top of that street. The flat bed van looks to be further down the street past the entrance in this moment though. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3429820/portugal-madeleine-mccann-ocean-club-praia-da-luz/

    ReplyDelete
  65. Ben Salmon reacts so soon. It seems like he is always reading here ;) His reasoning that Carla wasn't doxxed is ridiculous! Does he have to see proof of everyone's ID to know for CERTAIN that they do not exist?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The 'intelligent' and seemingly 'reasonable' individual known as Ben Salmon has much to hide.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous 12 Dec 2018, 11:19:00,

      One has to understand what is Mr Salmon’s mission: keep the debate.

      It’s not to keep the debate alive, it’s to make sure people keep debating. And debating, and then debate some more. Don’t let them come to any conclusion. Pick a point from here, another from there, show how no theory fits even though all theories have something valid about them.

      But please people, don’t commit to one, because ALL of them deserve your attention and none can be ruled out.

      And so the debate will go on, until people get tired of the case and leave. Eventually all will leave and people with Mr Salmon’s mission will have succeeded: they would have been able to keep the debate without conclusions.

      For that reason, his persona needs to be “intelligent”, “reasonable”, balanced, compromising, etc.

      As is said in Portugal, those who strive to please both Greeks and Trojans at the same time, end up being disliked by both.

      Delete
  66. Further to my last comment, there appears to be a high resolution image from an alternative angle here on Google Images. http://portugalresident.com/exclusive-%E2%80%9Cmark-warner-pulls-out-of-praia-da-luz%E2%80%9D-the-real-story

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 12 Dec 2018, 10:57:00,

      I hope you do understand the importance of both your photos!

      We will get back to them as soon as we can!

      Delete
    2. Look forward to reading about them.
      Regards, Chinese reader number 3, or is it 4? :)

      Delete
  67. https://twitter.com/Tealtraum/status/1072516414660116481
    Ben Salmon‏ @Tealtraum
    Thought I'd explained reverse image search...first instance of the photo i can find is a German article from 2017, credited 'Granata images' https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/In-Praia-da-Luz-wuerde-man-gern-vergessen-article19814942.html Also discussed on MoJ forum earlier this year. Nothing esoteric about it. http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9504.195 #McCann
    7:40 AM - 11 Dec 2018

    *****

    Ben Salmon coming to the Frog’s rescue is becoming quite the habit, isn’t it. The Frog is asked where she get’s these photos, refuses to answer or says it’s none of anyone’s business but then comes Mr Salmon along and explains and the Frog says coyly, oh Ben, you’ve spoiled it!

    What Mr Salmon forgets is that one has to have the original to do a reverse search. And if the photo had come from that article, which it didn’t because part of the pool is not visible, or from the forum, which it didn’t because the resolution is greater, then the Frog and DE F, didn’t need to squirm, wiggle and make a total fool of themselves trying to convince people that the photo was not taken in Cristaluz but from Block 2.

    Having had any of those 2 photos, all they had to do was to say, yes, they were taken from Cristaluz, here it is on this site. Why aren’t they in the Files, don’t know, ask the person who took them.

    But they don’t do that, do they? They insist that it wasn’t form Block 2. Stamp their feet, hold they breath and it has to be from Block 2.

    Basically, Mr Salmon and his reverse search only aggravated things for the Frog and DE F, confirming how compromising it was for the Frog to have put out a photo taken from the Cristaluz terrace.

    Not a very intelligent thing for you to have done, was it Mr Salmon?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe not a good idea indeed to bring on reverse image searching once again...

      I just did a google image search based on the n-tv.de picture (allegedly published on April 30, 2017). It only returned two sites, in addition to www.n-tv.de, linking to images with same size (1280 x 853):

      http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9504.195
      http://ocean.badgenot.site/ocean-club-praia-da-luz-algarve/

      It turns out that these images are stricly identical to the n-tv one in the sense that their color values are exactly the same at each and every pixel. They are therefore strict copies of the same file.

      The Frog's picture, however, has the same image size but slightly different pixel values here and there although this is hardly perceptible by eye. Consequently, either it was downloaded from one of these sites but was processed (can't see any reason for this), or it comes from a different source -- an image missed by google images, or not present on the internet. Make your mind.

      Note that the search also returned several pages from flash.pt linking to lower resolution images (828 × 523) so the Frog's picture was definitely not downloaded from those.

      All the Frog has to do to clarify the situation is to provide the URL from where she downloaded the image.

      NotFrog

      Delete
  68. Multiple unpublished Anon and do not publish anon (we're supposing you are the same person)

    We will answer all your comments as soon as we can. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  69. I've only sent you two messages this morning Tex, both asking for non-publication.

    If you would like my email address, please let me know.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 12 Dec 2018, 12:56:00,

      Thank you for this comment, that way we will be able to separate things. We will answer both your comments here then.

      Upfront, thank you for the information!

      Delete
  70. You're on the right track regarding the gang. X

    ReplyDelete
  71. I was invited to the Gang. X

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unpublished Anon at 12 Dec 2018, 13:08:00,

      Of all the names you mentioned only one surprised us, and it was the last one on your list.

      Not because you mentioned him/her because we know s/he is part but by the name you mentioned him/her. Very interesting, isn't it?

      Quite pleasing to see others see things as clear as we are.

      Delete
  72. Backpedalling and pouring with sweat today. Desperate to look innocent about all they have done. Even to the point of making their gang look as if it was out in the open all along. It wasn't and still isn't. X

    ReplyDelete
  73. They know that Inez is not an easy target and she's honest. Anything she decides to reveal will be believed by many, even secretly. X

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course! Most of the "top tweets" on #mccann over the last couple of days have been those by Inez. Very unusual for a new account to have so many in the top tweets of a hashtag. I think the explanation is that Inez's tweets are the ones that have been most "clicked on" and viewed, regardless of how many likes/followers etc. Tweeters on #mccann will be afraid to ally themselves with Inez, due to the bullies some of whom claim to have left but will still be lurking. However i am sure that in private many will agree with what Inez is saying and will be cheering her on from the wings. That might seem cowardly, but not everyone has it in them to take on a gang of loudmouth manipulators. Inez, regardless of different opinions on the McCann case, you are our heroine for finding the strength to do this x

      Delete
  74. https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072846416589086720
    xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
    Textusa where have you got it into your thick crazy head Ben confirmed ANYTHING you are accusing ANYONE of? Are you sick? But - How many others have you DM'd on people trying to turn them against him as your "Maria" alias? Dont test me - Thank you @Andreamariapre2 xxx #mccann
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuODyhtW0AAHeGG.jpg
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuOD0a5WsAUgl5R.jpg
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuOD0a5XQAEqDYF.jpg
    5:31 am - 12 Dec 2018

    Picture #1 is a transcription of this reply from us:
    [“Replies
    Textusa12 Dec 2018, 12:52:00
    https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1072829116653727746
    00Bugsy‏ @TheBunnyReturns
    Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx @mccannscamexpos
    Textusa is allowing "anon" pros on their blog to cause trouble and post totally untrue allegations. They get off on lying and encouraging others to do the same. I am in no secret groups, I am not in touch with Isabelle daily, and have never told anybody what to tweet.
    4:22 am - 12 Dec 2018

    *****

    Mr Thompson has just confirmed all that he’s accused of.

    He’s like one of the men in the lying riddle, the one who simply cannot tell the truth:
    http://textusa.blogspot.com/2010/05/lying-riddle.html”]

    Pictures #2 and #3 are screengrabs of a PRIVATE conversation between me and Andrea Marie Preston (AMP) on FB, which is no way has been authorised to be made public:

    Picture #2:
    [“[Me] Hello, are you Andrea Marie Preston on Twitter?
    [AMP] Yes…but my middle name is Maria
    [Me] And you are a Ben Thompson supporter. Goodbye. Live with your conscience.”]

    Picture #3:
    [“[AMP] Yes…but my middle name is Maria
    [Me] And you are a Ben Thompson supporter. Goodbye. Live with your conscience.
    [AMP] You are evil just like the people you support ie swinging Textusa…..pure evil”]

    This tweet has been liked by Jules and Andrea Marie Preston
    *****

    Silverdoe and Andrea Marie Preston have now, like Mr Thompson has in the past, made public a private conversation without authorisation.

    A disgusting and despicable behaviour and a warning to all those who have had private conversations with any of them and there shared any information in confidence.

    About the content of pictures #2 and #3 we have already explained it in our comment at 29 Nov 2018, 10:51:00 in the current post:
    “To be clear about Andrea Marie Preston: received from her a friend request on FB, so sent her a message asking her if she was @Andreamariapre2, she confirmed she was and informed her that because she was a huge Mr Thompson fan on Twitter, that I would not only not accept her friend request as I would block her, which I did.”

    As can be seen, then we explained what had happened without breaching any privacy.

    Why does Silverdoe have screengrabs of a private convo that happened between 2 other people?

    Need we say more?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Silverdoe constantly accuses this blog of disrupting the McCann hashtag on Twitter, but I can see no evidence of any direct input from here to there. All I can see are Silverdoe's continual tweets responding to comments made here which she is deliberately tagging. One would assume this to be blatant hypocrisy on her part, but when an ego of that magnitude gets bruised it's hardly surprising she forgets the reason why she claims to be involved in the first instance and and prioritises herself above Madeleine when it suits her.

      Delete
    2. https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1072873663462952962
      xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx 🔎 🧐 👁️‍ 🗨️ 💯‏ @xxSiLverdoexx
      Funny how you've complained textusa about others using a private convo as proof of your targeted harassment isn't it? When you have been screenshotting EVERYONE you don't like who stands up to you for months? Irony. You started it, remember that, ta ta (for now) :) #mccann
      7:19 am - 12 Dec 2018

      *****

      Someone should explain to Siverdoe what is the difference between what is said publicly and what is privately.

      Delete
    3. Exactly Anonymous 15:27:00 - why can't she come here to address the comments that are posted here instead of disrupting the tag HERSELF!!!!!

      Delete
    4. Unpublished Anonymous at 12 Dec 2018, 15:18:00, 12 Dec 2018, 15:56:00,

      You are clearly Mr Thompson.

      We consider disgusting and despicable anyone who publishes private convos, regardless of who.

      We are tired of reading your accusations against Carla Spade and like against us you limit yourself is to say “liar, liar, liar” without putting up those lies when challenged to do so.

      So man up for one time in your life and have the courage to write what you wrote on your Twitter and this time put your money where your mouth is and link it up with evidence like we have done with Silverdoe. Where, when and what Silverdoe has exposed is there for all to see.

      Carla has challenged you publicly to do the same and twitter is yet to see any proof from you.

      Delete
    5. I will try to post my comment again. The Gang are furious that we have this place to post comments where they have no control over anyone. They can't ban people from here, they can't manipulate and orchestrate attacks using private message. We can post anon and therefore they can't bully or control by doxxing and revealing personal info. In short they are completely powerless here, and that is what they can't handle :) Their last resort is to claim that the comments on here are from pros. Identical to the tactics they use when someone shows them up for what they are on Twitter. They are making themselves even angrier by returning here to read the comments, then losing their tempers and all reason when they bitterly complain about this blog on Twitter. Hilarious to observe. Keep calm and carry on, Textusa!

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    7. Comment received which we have censored:

      “Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Scare tactics":

      "Why does Silverdoe have screengrabs of a private convo that happened between 2 other people?"

      Very good question!

      It's my belief that only a few people control many accounts, they all like each other's tweets to make it look as though the gang is actually bigger than it really is. They all pile in to attack people (like Carla) to make it look as though more and more people dislike that person. It's all about manipulating public perception.

      We know that (censored) controlled (censored)’s account while she was on holiday - why? Could the account not have had a rest for a week or so? Why did it need to be controlled by someone else during that time? Clearly they share passwords which then gave (censored) access to DM's.

      We know that (censored) controls (censored) and probably (censored) and (censored).

      Also, (censored) seems to be tweeting day and night with no sleep - so who controls her account while she's asleep?

      It's my belief that the McCanns want all the decent tweeters to be hounded off the hashtag and for it to be left with a handful of abusive disruptors so that all antis can be tarred with the same 'vile trolls' brush. (censored) has been a blessing for the McCanns in that respect. And why don't the pros ever report these people instead of just batting banter and insults around between them? (censored) in particular could easily have been banned by the pros, or even the McCanns themselves.

      Much of what these people say about others is actually projection - they accuse others of what they do themselves and then they play the victim card.

      And another thing, it seems to me that they can be abusive as they like but as long as they use the name Madeleine in their tweet then it makes it ok. They are using Maddie for their sick games and agenda. They're not there for truth, they are there for a reason and that's to get rid of decent truthseekers.

      Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 12 Dec 2018, 15:52:00”

      *****

      We have censored the names from your comment. We are not familiar with the Twitter world (we only follow some accounts and have now become more familiar with Twitter than we we wished we would) so can not say what you have said is true.

      There is one paragraph which we know not to be true. Where you say “We know that (censored) controls (censored) and probably (censored) and (censored)” we know for a fact that person #1 does not control in anyway the others mentioned.

      We are also unaware of the “holiday takeover” you have mentioned.

      The rest of the comment, we agree with.

      Delete
    8. Anon,

      We corrected our comment and re-published it. That made you comment appear misplaced.

      Bringing it over to its correct location:

      "Anon12 Dec 2018, 16:30:00

      Holiday take over is true, saw the tweet, no doubt was left about it."

      Our apologies

      Delete
    9. I did see tweets where Silver was going to take over McF tweets whilst McF was on holiday - in N York if I recall. Silver was v flattered but I seem to recall that McF continued to tweet whilst on holiday. I think it was summertime.

      Delete
    10. The paragraph above that we are now uncensoring said this:

      "We know that Silverdoe controlled McFadden's account while she was on holiday - why? Could the account not have had a rest for a week or so? Why did it need to be controlled by someone else during that time? Clearly they share passwords which then gave Silverdoe access to DM's."

      Delete
    11. A trip to New York was tweeted about by McFakeone on 23rd September 2018.

      Delete
  75. Anon,

    We do hope you trust our judgement in not publishing some of your comments!

    :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your blog your choice, our risk, worth taking imo.

      Delete
  76. So now you choose to ignore my response that shows the spade person to have been doing that which both you and she deny, instead choosing to sweep it under the carpet and pretend " Mr Thompson " wrote the comment. I think its more than obvious you are she and she is you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mr Thompson,

      The difference between you and us is that we couldn't care less of what you think. You want to think that, fine. You want to call us pros? Go ahead. You want to say that we are here to protect the McCanns, by all means.

      Tell you what, we'll give a credit of a thousand other personas. Whoever you say we are, we are. If that makes you happy.

      Now put up where who you accuse has done what you accuse them of doing? You do realise that calling others liars without backing things up does have a limit after which it's all a bit cringing, right?

      Delete
    2. Ben Thompson always accuses people he can't control of being pros and he has been responsible for causing disruption on his own so-called side since his very first appearance on social media many years ago. He uses the 'repeat something often enough and people will begin to believe it' method and has muddied the waters for a very long time. In fairness to him, he was right and his method has worked well for him, although it has been slowly falling apart for a while now and continues to do so as more people are wising up to him.

      Delete
    3. Unpublished Anonymous at 12 Dec 2018, 18:52:00,

      Please make up your mind. We're either Carla Spade or we're not.

      If you believe we are, why tell us what we have to search in her timeline?

      By the way, submit as many comments as you wish. This is between you and Carla, not us. End of.

      Delete
    4. Anon @ 18:21:00
      A wonderful summation of the modus operandi of the odious Mr. Thompson! Absolutely spot on!

      Delete
  77. Do not publish Anonymous:
    at 12 Dec 2018, 09:34:00,
    at 12 Dec 2018, 12:36:00,
    at 12 Dec 2018, 16:08:00,
    at 12 Dec 2018, 16:48:00,
    at 12 Dec 2018, 17:02:00.

    All your information is being processed and quite mind-boggling. As you could see (you were a part of it) today we were overwhelmed with information.

    This is Christmas season and we do have someone who has suffered an unpleasant episode because of the blog, she and her family are evidently our priority. We do believe that we have answered many of your questions, though.

    You can provide your mail but by putting in do not publish comments, things are stored in our mailbox and easily retrievable.

    Our apologies but we certainly are not ignoring anything that you have submitted. Thank you for your help and support.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Identified do not publish reader at 12 Dec 2018, 18:29:00

    As you might imagine, what you have said needs processing. As we have said, this is quite the chaotic time of the year, so please do understand that we are not ignoring you.

    Could you please confirm that you were the one submitting all the do not comment published comments? Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Identified do not publish reader at 12 Dec 2018, 19:53:00,

      Comment received, we will contact you via mail.

      Thank you.

      Delete
  79. You'll be happy to know Silverdoe has now been ordered by her peers to stop reacting to comments made on this blog.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting, Anon 19:50. Is this the 'fantastic researcher' according to Queen McFake, but keeps contradicting herself and suffers from 'up-all-night tweetitis'?

      Can this be read somewhere?

      Delete
  80. With this comment this post will have 198 comments.

    We ask readers to stop commenting until we put up a new post.

    Thank you for understanding.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Textusa