Wednesday 23 February 2011

A Tad too Posh?



When, at the beginning of December last year, I asked to look at the Paraíso CCTV photos again, some called me crazy and many didn’t understand the exercise at the time.

I then, pressured I confess, explained that I wanted you notice two main things: the rather significant space required to be occupied by a large group of people having a meal and the fact that two of the T9 men were spotlessly dry.

Today, I hope that you now see that those pictures are indeed VALUABLE visual aids to understand that two LEGITIMATE and OFFICIAL facts, as stated in the PJ Files and to this day uncontested by the LEGITIMATE authorities, NEVER happened: the Tapas dinners (note the plural form of the word) at Tapas, and the life-risking May 3rd afternoon watersports adventure undertaken by all but one of the T9 men.

By the way, in my opinion, the only one who says that he didn’t play in the water that afternoon, was probably the only one who in reality did, as I bet there are a lot of water obstacles in the Boavista Golf Course, but that is another different story altogether.

Today, I say that there’s a THIRD valuable piece of information that can be withdrawn from the said pictures. As I intend to launch a challenge to you my readers quite soon, I’ll just state here right away what I think it is.

But let me just, before I say what I have to say, tell you what some people see what I don’t see: that the Paraiso CCTV pictures are alibi pictures.

Some have stated that the T9 were intentionally “posing” on the afternoon of May 3rd, to provide some kind alibi to hide the fact that Maddie's death happened before that day.

That, to me, makes no sense whatsoever.

One creates a false alibi in order to be seen somewhere AROUND ABOUT THE TIME the possible criminal activity is taking place or has just taken place. That’s the whole idea of an alibi: to be seen at a certain point in time somewhere else but the place where one is NOT to be seen.

So, IF (please note the BIG “if”) these pictures were to PROVE that the T9 were seeking an alibi, then they would PROVE that the crime happened around about the time these pictures were taken, and that would place the time of death late afternoon of May the 3rd.

And if posing for those pictures were to create an alibi for THAT afternoon, May 3rd, why then come up with the whole nonsensical story about the watersports “fun”, which is basically contradicted by those exact same pictures?

If it were me, I would make sure I would appear in them leaving no question that I had just recently come out of the water, preferably in a wetsuit, and would be keeping all possible receipts/bookings that would prove that I had really hired a boat.

But, as we've seen, they just appear in those pictures as if... they are having a late afternoon relaxed snack which I believe is all they were doing.

But a fundamental question one has to ask is whatever for were they creating, if they were, a false alibi?

What was supposed to be going on that required for the group to be seen there at that time?

For example, the watersports storyline was made up to create the illusion that Russell O’Brien and Matthew Oldfield were not where they were that afternoon, or to be more precise, they were not where and when Carol Tranmer-Fenn saw a blonde man exiting the Oldfield’s apartment by the back gate.

Much, much much earlier than the time seen on Paraiso CCTV pictures.

Now, that's one good reason to create an alibi.  

Russ was NOT supposed to be seen exiting THAT apartment THAT afternoon.

Why? There could have been a million innocent reasons for him to be seen where he was seen and doing what he was doing.

But he has what is known as "guilty conscience" which we all have when we know we’ve done something we shouldn’t have been doing.

 Life REALLY is sarcastic.

One one hand David Payne tells the truth because he doesn’t know if he’s been seen, or not, going into, and coming out of, Kate’s apartment, on the other Russell creates a lie because he knows he’s been seen.

David tells the truth “just in case”, Russell lies because he’s left with no choice but to deny as a preemptive tactic.

The Paraíso CCTV pictures represent just exactly what they portray: the last normal moments of the lives of these people.

Soon after these pictures were taken, their lives, and the lives of others, have become a daily living hell, to this day, as we all know.

 But today what I want is for you to look at Fiona Payne’s dress code, on that particular afternoon.

Doesn’t she just stand out from all others who just happen to be, as expected, casually dressed for one afternoon’s stroll by the beachfront?

She even stands out from Dianne Webster’s more conservative choice of clothing. Fiona Payne is dressed far more “poshly” than the remainder of the T party, wouldn't you say?

She seems to be dressed more likely to be going out on a shopping spree rather than to want fill up those skirt  and blouse with bothersome beach sand when she, supposedly, would have frolicked with the kids on the beach.

And just going back a little, to reinforce what was already said, would one “posh” oneself up for an alibi?

Maybe she had an “appointment” to go to later? No, please don’t say that she went jogging at around 7 pm that day.

We all know that whatever plans these people had for that evening/night were washed away.

So that particular urge to “run” at that particular moment was certainly triggered by something which was not the maintenance, or improvement, of body tonacity.

Or, maybe, most likely, she had come from an “appointment”? Much like the same way the watersports crowd had just come from theirs when they were pictured. I’ll, as I always like to do, let you THINK about it.

Update on Feb26th:

 One commentator at the MMF, has placed a photo sayimg "Fiona was wearing the same outfit on May 5th" This is the photo:
 
The difference in definition between this photo and the one's at Paraíso's makes me agree that the outfit is the same.

It only lacks the jacket, but the weather must have been warmer when this one was taken, in comparison with the temperature it must have been when all those people were having so much fun in the water.

But do look at Kate and Gerry, or the kids, for that matter. Are they poshly dressed? No. But are they dressed for the beach? For some fun in the sand? To get their feet wet, and clothes full of that grainy stuff? No.

They all look to be dressed for business "in-land". When I say, and maintain, that Fiona Payne is "too-poshly" dressed at the Paraiso CCTV pictures, I'm obviously making a statement in comparison with the natural beach-wear casual clothes the others WERE wearing, and that ANYONE would be wearing if one wanted to go INTO the beach.

Because if I was comparing that particular Fiona's outfit with what Kate wore in the 1000 day celebration, than I would have say that she was had very little dressing taste and that she was far, far from being posh.

The context is precise.

 Both Dianne and Fiona, on the CCTV pictures, are NOT dressed for what they say later they were doing around the time those pictures were taken.

24 comments:

  1. Tex,
    I often think people 'look' but they do not 'see' what I see is a group of very relaxed people enjoying themselves.
    Absent from this group is Kate and Gerry, why are they absent, it is the end of the holiday when will they have the opportunity to meet these 'friends' again.
    And thats it....they are NOT bothered they are NOT friends they are just a bunch of people on holiday, the Mccanns are not part of this group and never were, that is why we have the 'pact of silence' and the returning of the mega money from the Express Newspaper to Kate and Gerry from Tapas..none of them are involved with Mccanns, and they do not want to be involved.
    These people, the Tapas crew have been caught up in something not of their making. We need to go back to the start, go over it and then it will be clearer. Whatever happened, it was before 3rd that is why Mccanns are absent from Paradiso.

    ReplyDelete
  2. But...if they went to the beach bar Paraíso to be seen, to be caught on CCTV, in order to create an alibi for themselves that would cover the time a/the crime, or whatever unsavory thing was taking place, then one has to come to the conclusion that whatever happened was PLANNED( Maddies death, disappearance, "abduction")!!! It was not an unexpected freak accident, it was a plot!
    Goodness, it sends chills down my spine!

    On Fiona's attire, well, she always seemed to me to be the poshest of the Tapas women, as well as Rachel Oldfield. Some people are just not capable of doing the "casual look", not even for the beach or the weekly shopping at the supermarket.
    Kate and Jane are in another league, they are a disaster fashion wise, very poor taste in their choice of clothes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fiona looks ready for an evening out with Kate and Gerry(?) who are at their flat getting ready. The cafe paraiso was the dinner for that group( british, even on holidays use to eat early). Fiona had her mum to take care of her childs, then the baby monitor was ridiculous.
    David, most probably went atfer the CCTV to the 5A. Something hapenned( accident or not with him involved or just witnessing it) and the chaos starts.
    I think Mrs. Fenn heard all the disgrace that hapenned this evening but strategically, to avoid reporting it to the police, states that she was out after 6 O'clock.
    What Fiona has on her hands? A newspaper, a map, a menu or a childs book? could be that the book where they write the time events? Due to the panic generated, they must use what was quickly available. They said the book was from Madeleine but could be from the Paynes children.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think if these shots were meant to be an alibi Fiona Payne would NOT be dressed like this, she would have dressed specially for the part, in beach clothes. FP looks as though she is going somewhere special or is about to go somewhere. The men would have also shown us they had been on the water, maybe by leaning over the rail in their wetsuits to speak to the others.

    Is this the only day the children were fed at the Paraiso? We have various accounts of the McCann childrens' tea times which leads me to believe some of the statements saying they did are false. So it could be the rest of the children also did not eat with the creche group.

    If I was considering conspiracy theories then one could suggest the nannies might not know the children supposedly in their care. an opportunity to substitute a child. A reason why 'Maddy' becomes 'Madeleine'.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Are these the only stills of this group from Paradiso for the week, did they not go to Paradiso on other occasions during their holiday?

    ReplyDelete
  6. In my opinion Fiona is 'dressed to impress' smart new holiday clothes whereas the other ladies look casual and comfortable.

    Maybe Fiona did not know the rest of the party as well as they knew each other hence her 'making an effort' to look nice.

    I other thing I notice is how cluttered and squashed the table is and considering they are not all present I can see your point Textusa about a BIG ROUND table and non-existant dinners at Tapas.

    Well done !

    ReplyDelete
  7. The Paridiso appears very crowded with other diners eating and drinking.
    Holiday makers often take photographs at dinner and the McCanns must have been aware of that and that is why they requested holiday makers snaps.

    I bet there are photographs with them in and they know it.

    Russians are the 'new rich' and there are loads of them at all resorts now - there could have been people like that at PDL taking innocent photographs, gone home and thought nothing more of the their holiday. I doubt the Russians had Maddie 24/7.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Another load of rambling, irrelevant claptrap, Textusa.

    You can't tell from a series of stills whether anyone was ''spotlessly dry'' as you describe it

    You seem determined to describe Fiona Payne's outfit - which appears to me to be a summer top and skirt - as if it was a ballgown, topped off with a tiara. There is another still photo, one of those taken by the family, in which it looks as if she is wearing the same, or a similar top. It's just a strappy top.

    No wonder you paint yourself into corners - you arrive at conclusions which are not in any way supported by that which you present as evidence.

    Or to put it more succinctly, you talk complete shite.

    ReplyDelete
  9. 7:29,

    Why you still so worried? What have you to do with this?
    You seems very uncomfortable with what is being highlighted regarding some characters. Strange for a simple reader/poster.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I've just been researching stills of Paraiso at 'Pamalam' and she mentioned opposite the church a derelict building also lots of shrubland and roadworks - there were plenty of places to hide a body.

    But the one thing I notice most is how small all the restaurants are; Chaplins for example so tiny, so is Paraiso and Tapas Bar there is NO WAY a large party could have been seated together considering the space they would need.

    But all these places are visible from the church, shrubland, derelict building, chaplins and the McCanns spent soooo much time in that church.
    I know they say they were all on holiday together, but there are no photographs of them as a group, they all arrived at Faro from different airports in UK, maybe this Tapas thing is just a nonsense, another cover.

    Also consider the Tapas who would then give away all those thousands of pounds given to them by the Express newspaper group, if they could they would have kept that money, they look like they needed it, so why did they give it back...because they knew when the truth came out Express Newspapers would claim its money back, like the Terry Sheriden case, they know they are guilty.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Textusa,

    This is quite interesting...

    http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/2011/02/03/163-questions-the-mccanns-should-address-in-their-very-truthful-book/

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anon @ 7.29

    What is your problem?

    Why are you getting so worked up?

    Why don't you offer some constructive thoughts?

    What is your involvement?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Textusa,

    Me thinks it is you that writes these 'bad comments' as your puntuation is identical (eg as in Insane and Yawn ) always a comma before Textusa, same style of writing.

    Good ploy Tex, gets lots of response, but a little bit cheating.xx

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anon @ 10.17

    You have just proved it's not Textusa writing bad comments....it's you! What is YOUR PROBLEM?

    I think you are telling us YOU are Yawn/Insane and someone unknown as well. Thank you, now we know you are one and the same. Your style of writing is the biggest give away. It's so predictable. next time you write you will probably try to disguise it but who cares?

    Now why don't you tell us what is causing you so much anxiety? What would you like to say, we are waiting to hear what you have to offer. You must have a lot on you chest you would like to share otherwise you would not comment and get so wound up.

    I can understand someone being irate if they could see flaws in the information but that gives a perfect opportunity to explain how that could be wrong. What do you offer?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Insane's/Ywan's/Whoever's posts can be continued to be seen, if and when they appear, where they belong: Textusa's Trash Can.

    Anon Feb 23, 2011 10:15:00 PM, an answer to your comment will be given in a separate post.

    ReplyDelete
  16. All Monica's tags
    child abduction(1)
    missing children(1)
    praia de luz(1)
    true-life crime(1)

    Madeleine by Monica ?

    So boring life......... so boring book........ so boring.

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/tag/child%20abduction/products/A2YZFTYFOA1LR9


    MC

    ReplyDelete
  17. 7:29, 10:17, Yawn, Insane,

    Why you gave up on the last post, when posters start calling you Kate and connecting you with Mccann's?
    You come here everyday, not to discuss issues, not to get accurate information. You know the accurate information, you know the truth, you know what happened after this CCTV in Cafe Paraiso, on May 3 2007. You come here to spy what is going on and maybe to try to access the electronic contacts of who post here or to spread virus. What worries you? What is not leaving your conscience to rest?
    Your posts are realing amazing and like a fish you are dying trough your mouth.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I Insane,

    Just a quick look on Textusa Trash can, full of you, revealing yourself. How do you know the Mccann's did not know the Tapas workers? May 3 was almost the end of the holidays. Strange for a group who claimed to pass so many hours in the Resort playing tennis, carrying Kids many times in and out of the creche, having meals around the Tapas, For not knowing the Tapas workers. Interesting... a so unnoticed couple, got the statement of a lady coocker, from the Tapas, puting them near the pool with Madeleine on May 3 around lunch time. That statement will be a good help if the last picture of Madeleine was handed to the police on that night. Unfortunnatly for you, came only after May 20, after the first trip Gerry made to Rothley.
    Did you noticed that trough your posts you are revealing the truth?- The Mccann's did not know the Tapas workers or vice-versa because the Tapas dinner never happened. Who made the connections was somebody at high place in the Resort.
    Good knowledge you have about medicines, yes Dr. Insane?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Who wrote this script? And this is supposed to be the Leicester Police report. Were Mr Wilkins and Ms O'Donnell even present when this was supposed to be recorded?

    "Jeremy and Bridget had visited the Tapas bar on several occasions during which they noticed the group had reserved a table for every night of their holiday. This appeared to be contrary to the set down procedure of not booking a table any further than three days ahead. The group appeared boisterous but good natured with Gerry being the central figure. His gregarious character making him appear to be the central figure in the group and almost holding court. However they did notice that David Payne was equally gregarious and almost playing along with, if not up to, Gerry.

    Jeremy and Bridget became aware that although the McCanns had taken up the use of the crèche facility during the day, they had not done so for the evening hours and had left the children in the apartment but were checking on them regularly and that other members of the group appeared to be doing the same.
    They expressed surprise over this as the McCanns apartment was set in a location that appeared vulnerable. They were aware that the apartment was a corner building and with easy access from the road. The apartments were not very secure Jeremy and Bridget had visited the Tapas bar on several occasions during which they noticed the group had reserved a table for every night of their holiday. This appeared to be contrary to the set down procedure of not booking a table any further than three days ahead. The group appeared boisterous but good natured with Gerry being the central figure. His gregarious character making him appear to be the central figure in the group and almost holding court. However they did notice that David Payne was equally gregarious and almost playing along with, if not up to, Gerry.

    Jeremy and Bridget became aware that although the McCanns had taken up the use of the crèche facility during the day, they had not done so for the evening hours and had left the children in the apartment but were checking on them regularly and that other members of the group appeared to be doing the same.
    They expressed surprise over this as the McCanns apartment was set in a location that appeared vulnerable. They were aware that the apartment was a corner building and with easy access from the road. The apartments were not very secure and entry could easily be gained.Jeremy and Bridget had visited the Tapas bar on several occasions during which they noticed the group had reserved a table for every night of their holiday. This appeared to be contrary to the set down procedure of not booking a table any further than three days ahead. The group appeared boisterous but good natured with Gerry being the central figure. His gregarious character making him appear to be the central figure in the group and almost holding court. However they did notice that David Payne was equally gregarious and almost playing along with, if not up to, Gerry.

    Jeremy and Bridget became aware that although the McCanns had taken up the use of the crèche facility during the day, they had not done so for the evening hours and had left the children in the apartment but were checking on them regularly and that other members of the group appeared to be doing the same.
    They expressed surprise over this as the McCanns apartment was set in a location that appeared vulnerable. They were aware that the apartment was a corner building and with easy access from the road. The apartments were not very secure and entry could easily be gained."

    I'm really struggling to accept this one!

    Please read the rest and see what you think.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I did wonder if there was competition between Payne and McCaan and that Mccann was not too keen on Payne, Jealous Payne had a prettier wife, perhaps Gerry fancied Fiona!!

    I thought this was because when there is a large group some members get on better than others and then some are always on the perifery.

    I doubt Gerry had ever met Diana Webster before so those two would have been complete strangers in this scenario.

    Reading back it was Gerry that introduced Peadaphilla into the story he is reported as talking very loudly on the phone to someone when Maddie first disappeared saying a peadaphile had taken her. So HE is the one that kept on about
    paedophiles and introduced them into the story.

    The Gaspars are friends of the mccanns so I think their statement, considering everything else that has been manipulated is a threat to Payne, (from Gerry) remember Katherine says it happened on more than one occasion very odd that she should continue meeting up with such people, and she dosn't say anything about Gerry, always Payne. Same as Yvone Martins statement she says she cannot remember Payne in which capacity victim or perpetrator (not very professional thing to say).

    Finally, when Payne states about 'pact of silence' he continues that SAME sentence with 'everything we say is going via Gerry first' (or words to that effect) so again Gerry was controlling what info was being sent out by Tapas.

    Men like Gerry crave the attention of females, always wanting to be centre of attention.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I have just read the Express Editor has retired and he mentions the 'maddie case' his paper paid out £550,000.00 damages to this group.

    He also mentions that in America this libel case would have been thrown out because his paper 'showed no malice' as in the recent Beckham case being thrown out. It puzzles me that the court just accepted the 'rabblings' of Carter ruck and did'nt request the case be re-opened, or ask for more information afterall this is a huge amount of money and with such an injustice to a little girl, it really does seem our legal system is corrupt.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Hello fellow Textusa's "brain-donors" (as if Textusa has any need of...most would be so lucky to have half her brains)!

    Someone mentioned the following in Joana Morais' blog, and I think it's well worth reading:

    http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t1844-50-facts-about-the-maddie-case-that-the-british-media-are-not-telling-you

    ReplyDelete
  23. This quite an interesting article Tex..
    http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t1844-50-facts-about-the-maddie-case-that-the-british-media-are-not-telling-you

    ReplyDelete
  24. Trashcan... what a great idea. What smells bad, want to smell bad, want to bother those that don't want to smell the bad those that smell bad intentionally, should have a place where they don't bother the rest of us who don't want smell their bad smell.

    Insane, your obsession with this blog tells so much about you and who you're protecting.

    Donn't you have a drop of pride?

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Textusa