The original post has surpassed the 200 comments so, as our readers know when that happens, we publish a post like this one, so that readers can continue commenting.
We will be copying the comments that went over the 200 mark into this new post, apologies for the repeating.
From previous post:
ReplyDeleteTextusa5 Feb 2019, 13:05:00
https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1092746225869377536
J B Littlemore @JBLittlemore
Replying to @EricaCantona7 @jules1602x and 36 others
Nail a flag to the top of a slippery pole & it's very difficult to take it down again. However high one swings ... ; )
3:26 am - 5 Feb 2019
*****
Never a truer word spoken as JBlittlemore is finding out for himself, as recently have others before him.
From the previous post:
ReplyDeleteAnonymous5 Feb 2019, 13:08:00
How do the sisters (Irwins, Jensen/Wiltshire etc) fit in with the swinging engagement?
Anonymous 5 Feb 2019, 13:08:00,
DeleteAll we can do is to stick to facts. It has been reported on a newspaper that the Jensen sisters said they had dinner at Tapas on May 3.
Their name does not appear in the Tapas reservation sheets.
We have offered there having been the possibility that the Irwin sisters were put on tapas sheet in error and it should have been Jensen sisters but that is our opinion only.
We’re not going to name any of them as swingers, as you’re asking us to do.
They put themselves there in the early evening drinking, it's possible the journalist just misinterpreted that as meaning the late evening.
DeleteFrom the previous post:
ReplyDeleteAnonymous5 Feb 2019, 13:11:00
Any thoughts on this article? Claims he was in the resort and enjoyed sailing. His name isn't on any run sheets that I can find. https://blogs.thisismoney.co.uk/2007/05/my_experience_o.html
Comment submitted to be published in previous post and being brought to this one by us:
ReplyDelete"Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Jules and owning the BRT":
They’ve got very short memories , or selective amnesia .
They must have forgot the way they treated Lizzy HDH , both on twitter , fb and NT’s blog .
Now that WAS harassment .
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 5 Feb 2019, 13:39:00"
Do readers remember how happy this family was then?
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1047988628272697346
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
I take it Fred [no relation with the blog] was evil... :)
Instead of rooting them out you joined them... :)
But we're Bunny girls... :)
Major B [Blacksmith] and Major NT call the shots but we're one big happy team... :)
JBL is the Godfather... He is God.. :)
4:15 pm - 4 Oct 2018
Spot what's missing:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/oa/OA_TEL/OA_13_TEL_Page_066.jpg
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/OA_11V/Relatorio_de_analise%20dos_primeiros_11_volumes_Page39.jpg
Anonymous 5 Feb 2019, 15:42:00,
DeleteCould you please share what you mean with us and our readers? Thank you.
If your prefer not to, this comment will be deleted.
In Anexo 39, there's a phone contact listed for David Payne at 1959 on the 3rd. On the ping sheet that contact is absent. Why?
DeleteAnonymous 5 Feb 2019, 18:49:00,
Deletehttp://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/OA_11V/Relatorio_de_analise%20dos_primeiros_11_volumes_Page39.jpg
After checking this chart and it’s true that David Payne made a call at 19.59.26 on May 5 to a mobile with the number 93*****00. It doesn’t show on ping charts.
Interesting are also the calls at 19.30 and 19.31 by Dianne Webster.
On May 4 he calls this number at 6.11.pm when we are supposing he’s back in Luz from Portimão. This doesn’t show on ping. What does show on ping is call at 6.13pm.
Who was mobile 93*****00? It would be interesting to know. ‘93’ would make it an Optimus mobile so could belong to anyone local, Portuguese or British immigrant.
Interesting he calls this number an hour after seeing Kate McCann and would be supposedly playing tennis with Gerry and the other Tapas men, and when he returns from the police station.
All above said, it also must be said that this proves that the ping chart seems not to be a reliable means to determine the making of calls as apparently some do not get registered.
Maybe you would like to share your thoughts on this subject with readers.
From "FB Anon":
ReplyDelete"Oh dear, JBL can’t help putting his foot in it. ‘High flying doctor’ ‘near the top of his tree’ ‘not wanting to lose his image’ takes his family to downmarket PdL on a bargain bucket holiday."
“FB Anon”, you mean this thread?
Deletehttps://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1092807952812163076
J B Littlemore @JBLittlemore
Serious question:- what would two medical professionals, one nearing the top of the tree, consider to be grounds for alleging an abduction of M #Mccann in lieu of revealing the reality of her fate? Logically ... ? #startingpoint #sense #logic
7:31 am - 5 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/MancunianMEDlC/status/1092809656731398144
SOCIALIZED MEDICINE @MancunianMEDlC
Replying to @JBLittlemore
If a Medical Error caused the Death of their daughter. How would that be received inthe Medical World ??
7:38 am - 5 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1092811642516180999
J B Littlemore @JBLittlemore
Replying to @MancunianMEDlC
Agreed. That's a good starting point. A high flying doctor, not wanting to lose his professional status/image or be struck off - negligence resulting in death of a child would be unthinkable. #Mccann
7:46 am - 5 Feb 2019
Do add this series of pearls:
Deletehttps://twitter.com/AndyFish19/status/1092811537901854721
Andy Fish @AndyFish19
Replying to @JBLittlemore
The risk of losing EVERYTHING! Careers, reputation, social status, house, twins etc (in that order too!) Is my opinion on why they wanted to try & cover-up the death of Madeleine #McCann & proceed to stage an 'abduction'.
(I believe in the sedation/neglect theory though)
7:45 am - 5 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1092812568811458561
J B Littlemore @JBLittlemore
Replying to @AndyFish19
Loss ... yes, important word. Is his career in particular is prized over most other things? So sedation - accidental or deliberately administered? And what if sedation resulted in M having an accident/falling? #Mccann
7:49 am - 5 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/AndyFish19/status/1092814876500729857
Andy Fish @AndyFish19
Replying to @JBLittlemore
If there were ANY traces of sedation in an autopsy, then they would've been FINISHED! Hence why they had to get rid of poor M's body (imo).
Fear of loss / consequences / punishment etc, in a situation abroad & overwhelmed with sheer panic. Quick decisions were made! #McCann
7:59 am - 5 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1092816328388472832
J B Littlemore @JBLittlemore
Replying to @AndyFish19
I think that makes a lot of sense. Any sort of medication that was detected at autopsy - that wasn't run of the mill paediatric suspension/Calpol etc., in normal dosage - would raise concerns, be it accidental or deliberate over administration. #Mccann
8:04 am - 5 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/AndyFish19/status/1092820005929041921
Andy Fish @AndyFish19
Replying to @JBLittlemore
It's the only plausible thesis in my honest view. And I've discussed this case inside out & upside down for many a year, but I've never come across a more convincing theory of what happened that fateful night! #McCann
8:19 am - 5 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1092822230201978882
J B Littlemore @JBLittlemore
Replying to @AndyFish19
It is a plausible theory. So, with that in mind, how far from the source (ie #Mccann parents) would the assistance with possible concealment go? Just a couple of the T7? More? Unwittingly or knowingly? #Mccann
8:28 am - 5 Feb 2019
*****
Do these people have the faintest idea what are the legal consequences for abandonment in Portugal? Even when death is involved?
Sedation, they would be FINISHED! Swinging? Nah, about that no one cares...
Lets keep the narrative contained to the T9. So obvious. They're not being played. They're the players. For what reason, one can but wonder.
DeleteAnonymous 5 Feb 2019, 21:26:00,
DeleteOh no, not the entire T9! Please read attentively “Just a couple of the T7? More? Unwittingly or knowingly?”
So, according to JBLIttlemore, of the T9, some don’t know!
Amazing. In a group of 9, a few (we don’t know how many) kill accidentally a girl, and continue their dinner and the rest of their friends back at the table don’t even notice it!
Mystery explained. All makes sense now!
And the McCanns left some medicine lying aabout (they got some complimentary Jiffy bags with dangerous medical samples) and left 'em lying about so the kids might play with them, then went off to Tapas using a hand mirror to look over their shoulder at 5a - in the dark.
DeleteBut I'm only saying 'if' (so I don't need to show proof).
Where did this group acquire enough strong sedatives for all of the children for all of the nights they were supposedly dining?
DeleteWhat sedative of this potency can safely be administered without the constant attendance of an anaesthetist?
Can any of these theorists name a likely sedative?
Is it from a spindle, like in Sleeping Beauty?
https://twitter.com/AndyFish19/status/1092894858208006144
ReplyDeleteAndy Fish @AndyFish19
Replying to @PollyGraph69 @NancyParks8 and 37 others
You're not here for Madeleine, you pathetic piece! Just like the Spade isn't. Whimpering isn't & some Twat called, Mari, isn't
Anymore to add to that list (I'm sure I missed one)
Textusa WANTS ALL TO BE COMPLICIT in a Swinging cover up to get the parents off! #McCann
1:16 pm - 5 Feb 2019
*****
By saying we believe that Kate McCann and David Payne were present at the moment when and the location where Maddie accidentally died, it’s evident to all our readers that we are CLEARLY wanting to “get the parents off!”.
And it’s clear that if we didn’t to “get the parents off!”, we would be speculating about sedation that the PJ, those idiots, forgot to mention it in the final report.
The blog would like to say the following about McFadden’s petition:
ReplyDeleteIf anyone wants to get insult people, namely Mr Thompson, Silverdoe and it seems the latest victim of this to be Sade Anslow (we are naming these because we have seen them targeted there), we urge people NOT TO USE McFadden's petition to do that.
No matter how much one thinks it will have absolutely no effect, the bottom line is that it has Madeleine's name there.
If one doesn’t like who is behind the petition and who is supporting it, just ignore it.
DO NOT use it to insult because that is extremely disrespectful to Maddie.
Thank you.
“Do not publish...” identified reader at 6 Feb 2019, 01:42:00
ReplyDeleteAs you know we cannot, without compromising your identity, say anything more than to thank you for your words. For that reason alone, what we would like to say will be left unsaid.
https://twitter.com/AndyFish19/status/1093114828485545984
ReplyDeleteAndy Fish @AndyFish19
Replying to @EricaCantona7 @DuskatChristie and 38 others
.... If GA wrote a book (not backed up by evidence) but on a Swinging holiday, & the majority of PDL were all 'in on it' to help the #McCann cover-up the death of their daughter, then would K&G spend millions on trying to silence that? A genuine Q to anyone...
3:50 am - 6 Feb 2019
*****
Mr Fish, a genuine A:
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/7nov7/STAR-05-11-07.htm
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/05-11-2007-Star1-MaddieMumOrgyFury.JPG
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/05-11-2007-Star2-MaddieMumOrgyFury.JPG
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/05-11-2007-Star3-MaddieMumOrgyFury.JPG
'MADDIE MUM ORGY FURY'
Original Source: STAR: MONDAY 05 NOVEMBER 2007
BY Jerry Lawton
MADELEINE McCanns’ parents were seething last night after a top criminologist called for a probe into claims they were swingers.
Former police inspector Jose Barra da Costa urged detectives to investigate rumours that the couple indulged in wife-swapping.
The university professor, who has assisted in several murder investigations, admitted that the line of inquiry was “dark”.
But he said Portuguese police should have checked it out in case it was relevant to their inquiries into the disappearance of Madeleine on May 3, just before her fourth birthday.
Paulo Rebelo, the detective in charge of the case, has now vowed to undertake a “root and branch” review of the entire case, wherever it might lead.
Da Costa’s comments sparked outrage from Madeleine’s parents Kate and Gerry, both 39.
At the weekend, Kate wept in church while hearing priests pray for the “miracle” return of her daughter.
The couple’s spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: “this is extremely offensive, deeply hurtful and completely ludicrous. it is not true to suggest they are or ever have been swingers.
“It is obviously defamatory and he – and all those who spread rumours like this – had better be aware that our lawyers are watching.
“Kate and Gerry are extremely angry. it almost defies belief that anyone could cast such an obscene, entirely false slur on a couple so devastated by the loss of their daughter.”
Da Costa claimed he had been passed the “swinging” allegations by a former police colleague who was working on the case.
Although he had no evidence to back up the allegation, it had circulated on the web.
Net gossips said the couple’s home town of Rothley, Leics, was not far from Loughborough – dubbed the “swingers’ capital of Britain”.
One newspaper even sent undercover investigators to a swingers’ club in the town to ask if anyone knew the McCanns.
But, even though the couple have been named official suspects in the disappearance, detectives have at no point suggested wife-swapping has played any part in their inquiries.
Yesterday, da Costa told Portuguese newspaper 24 Hours that police had bungled by refusing to look into the rumours.
(Cont)
(Cont)
ReplyDeleteHe said: “I mentioned the swinging matter, because it was what people were speaking about on internet sites and in the coffee shops of Praia da Luz where the McCanns used to go.
“That was given as one example of a point in the investigation that should have been cleared up.
“Although it’s dark, it’s an aspect which had to be checked out – just like many others.”
He also blasted police for failing to pinpoint the “minute by minute” movements of the McCanns and their pals the night Madeleine vanished.
He added that the McCanns should have been charged with “gross negligence” for leaving Madeleine and twins Sean and Amelie, two, alone in their holiday apartment.
Detectives yesterday hit back by pointing out that 285 children had been reported missing in Portugal since Madeleine disappeared – and all had been found safe and well.
Police have accused Kate of accidentally killing her daughter after giving her sedatives. Police allege that the couple then disposed of the body.
The McCanns vehemently deny any involvement, insisting Madeleine was abducted.
On Saturday – exactly six months since her daughter vanished – Kate sobbed uncontrollably during a prayer vigil at the Church of St Mary and St John near her home.
Devout Catholics Kate and Gerry had earlier taken Sean and Amelie to the church “for a few moments of solitude” before the service.
An excited Sean ran up to a collage of photos of his missing sister, touched each one and said: “My Madeleine!”
******
From the above:
MADELEINE McCanns’ parents were seething last night after a top criminologist called for a probe into claims they were swingers.
(…)
The couple’s spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: “this is extremely offensive, deeply hurtful and completely ludicrous. it is not true to suggest they are or ever have been swingers.
“It is obviously defamatory and he – and all those who spread rumours like this – had better be aware that our lawyers are watching.
“Kate and Gerry are extremely angry. it almost defies belief that anyone could cast such an obscene, entirely false slur on a couple so devastated by the loss of their daughter.”
Does this answer your GENUINE question, Mr Fish?
These 2 tweets have already been published but now have a whole new meaning:
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1090765954169167872
J B Littlemore @JBLittlemore
Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx @Anvil161Anvil16 and 2 others
If you look closely you'll notice they vanish a bit when asked - repeatedly - to provide proof of their allegations & theories. Maybe, rather than be asked again, they change subject? So now it's NT. Who knows... ; )
4:17 pm - 30 Jan 2019
https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1090767676576804867
SheLLxx 💯 #MMJC#blockshills @xxSiLverdoexx
Replying to @JBLittlemore @Anvil161Anvil16 and 2 others
lol yes when I asked them to provide proof of a BRT before the 4th from inside the tapas? They tried to deflect with the Hynds stuff :) They'll go back to high tide next, then the skirtings, the boats then the dogs then. You've handled them all with more patience than I would!
4:24 pm - 30 Jan 2019
*****
And now both JBLittlemore and Silverdoe have their tweets protected. They have vanished. The irony.
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1093187046829625345
ReplyDeleteGreen Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @CarlaSpade @rambojambo9
Textusa did a piece on the bar bills charged each night to the Tapas diners' supplementary account. Perhaps you should read it or were those entries all fake, too? #mccann
8:37 am - 6 Feb 2019
*****
Frog,
You should know better than to try to use us to mislead and misinform people.
No, we didn’t do any piece on bar bills. Simple reason is that we are certain there were no bar bills for the T9 from Tapas/Ocean Club.
What he did was to debunk that exact concept, that there were bar bills. We did this in a comment in our post “Swinging tablecloth”.
https://textusa.blogspot.com/2018/11/swinging-tablecloth.html
The comments were:
Textusa24 Nov 2018, 13:16:00
...and there are people who still say they believe the Tapas dinners existed.
We know they just saying what they have to say and not what they do believe.
We will wait for Jules to show us the Tapas9 Tapas bill.
Maybe ask NT to give her a restaurant receipt so she can attach to one of her tweets. Not from Miami this time, it has to be from Praia da Luz.
Textusa24 Nov 2018, 16:26:00
Jules has replied:
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1066328744548290560
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Tex love.. You only had to ask & not write a 5,000 word paragraph.. Calm down.. Here you go..
#McCann
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TAPAS_BOOKING.htm
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DsxcUQ9WwAAXETl.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DsxcVNCWwAAGlHV.jpg
5:52 am - 24 Nov 2018
*****
Jules,
You seem to fail to understand the concept of “all inclusive”. There isn’t to be a Tapas bill unless wine was charged separately but you say “they had free wine with their meals too...”.
So, according to you, there was no bill. They paid all related with bed, breakfast and dinner upfront when they paid for the trip. As dinner was at Tapas, there would be no bill.
What you have presented is the Ocean Club booking sheets. The costs expressed should be all that was consumed outside the all inclusive package. So, nothing to do with dinners.
Plus, of the liquids consumed that are registered in the Tapas reservation sheets, which ones were consumed by the T9 and of these, where’s the breakdown between the various T9 families (McCanns, Paynes, O’Briens and Oldfileds)?
But let’s imagine the amounts expressed are that of the wine (which you said was free):
The analysis is based on the following documents:
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/T/03_VOLUME_IIIa_Page_617.jpg
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/T/03_VOLUME%20_IIa_Page_621.jpg
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/T/03_VOLUME_IIIa_Page_625.jpg
(Cont)
(Cont)
ReplyDeleteSo the tab on a daily basis is the following
McCann – 242€ (pg 617), 242€ (pg 621), 242€ (pg 625) – they consumed a lot of wine up to Tuesday, really a lot, and then between these days, they didn’t. Is that credible? No, it isn’t so don’t try to push this as the McCann Tapas bill.
O’Brien – 105€ (pg 617), 105€ (pg 621), 105€ (pg 625) – they consumed a lot of wine up to Tuesday, however less than half the McCanns did, and then between these days, they didn’t. Is that credible? No, it isn’t so don’t try to push this as the Payne Tapas bill.
Payne – 117€ (pg 617), 162€ (pg 621), 162€ (pg 625) – they consumed a lot of wine up to Tuesday when they consumed 45€ and then Wednesday and Thursday they consumed nothing. Is that credible? No, it isn’t so don’t try to push this as the Payne Tapas bill.
Oldfield – 21€ (pg 617), 26€ (pg 621), 31€ (pg 625) – the only family keeping a steady consumption after Tuesday of 5€. Prices in Portugal are cheap but not that cheap. Is that credible? No, it isn’t so don’t try to push this as the Oldfield Tapas bill.
We continue to wait for you to show the Tapas bill you spoke of.
Noticed you avoided commenting on our analysis of the liquid consumption (not only of the T9) that is registered in the Tapas reservation sheets.
About the amounts expressed in the Guest reservation sheets, they don’t add up, another evidence that they have been tampered with:
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2015/05/balance-unbalanced.html
*****
As can be clearly seen the amounts expressed do not represent any “bar bill” no matter how much one stretches and pulls them to fit.
And to your question “or were those entries all fake, too?”, we repeat the last paragraph above:
“About the amounts expressed in the Guest reservation sheets, they don’t add up, another evidence that they have been tampered with:
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2015/05/balance-unbalanced.html”
So, yes, those entries have been tampered with, so only the Ocean Club can say which ones are fake and which aren’t. But some must be fake because the totals don’t tally up.
https://mobile.twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1093176520539922433
ReplyDeleteHe said no such thing!
There was a press article saying this is what Rebelo suspected but nothing in the files to support him saying this!
Anonymous 6 Feb 2019, 18:38:00,
DeleteThank you! Another priceless moment!!
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1093176520539922433
Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet
Replying to @justice4maddie @Chinado59513358 and 39 others
Amaral had suspicions that children were previously all monitored in one of the apartments. As we know one adult always stayed behind
7:56 am - 6 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/AndyFish19/status/1093205105657212929
Andy Fish @AndyFish19
Replying to @McCannCaseTweet @justice4maddie and 39 others
Hello. Can you provide a cite for for that then in what Goncalo Amaral allegedly said?
I've never heard him say that myself but interested in seeing it though...
Many thanks.
#McCann
9:49 am - 6 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1093205971424309248
Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet
Replying to @AndyFish19 @justice4maddie and 39 others
It’s in a documentary, I can’t remember which one.
9:53 am - 6 Feb 2019
*****
Must be form the same documentary where Isabelle McFadden has said that MR Amaral said he sat at the BRT, the table the T9 sat!.
Mr Fish, no accusations of WUMming about this? Why not?
Haha. She's always "busy" when anyone asks for proof for one of her lies. She just kicks the ball into the long grass and hopes the person forgets what they have asked, which they usually do given the transitory nature of Twitter. This is why she excels in this medium ... while people are asking for proof of her claims, she has already moved on to new claims to amaze and astound. It's a rolling con trick.
Deletehttps://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1093228458354794497
DeleteMadeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet
Replying to @rambojambo9 @Andreamariapre2 and 39 others
Funny thing is that I found the info, as I was trying to prove Shannon L was wrong...then I found it
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dyvte-tUUAAqyKU.jpg
11:22 am - 6 Feb 2019
[Picture attached says the following:
“Sharon Lawrence
@5haroni
Goncalo Amaral suggested all Tapas 9 kids slept in 1apt.
Each night, 1 Tapas member was missing from the table – was neglect #McCann alibi?
2/22/16, 10:30 AM
1 Retweet 1 Like”]
https://twitter.com/AndyFish19/status/1093231998355804165
Andy Fish @AndyFish19
Replying to @McCannCaseTweet @rambojambo9 and 39 others
What the hell is this bollox?
A tweet from a well-known shill to try & back up what Goncalo said as a fact?
Get some proper facts on here please.
(Not having a go - just want facts & truth)
Cheers, love.
#McCann
11:36 am - 6 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1093176520539922433
DeleteMadeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet
Replying to @justice4maddie @Chinado59513358 and 39 others
Amaral had suspicions that children were previously all monitored in one of the apartments. As we know one adult always stayed behind
7:56 am - 6 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/Andreamariapre2/status/1093212009271828480
Andrea maria preston @Andreamariapre2
Replying to @McCannCaseTweet @justice4maddie and 39 others
Was there a letter from one of PJ investigators to Mitchell to that effect about 7 children (not 8) 'in 1 apt and Mitchell didn't pick up that one was missing
10:17 am - 6 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093213170494304256
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @Andreamariapre2 @McCannCaseTweet and 39 others
It wasn't GA though...
10:21 am - 6 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/Andreamariapre2/status/1093213628713631744
Andrea maria preston @Andreamariapre2
Replying to @jules1602x @McCannCaseTweet and 39 others
No. I can't remember which one it was though. Someone will know
10:23 am - 6 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/Andreamariapre2/status/1093225149179023361
Andrea maria preston @Andreamariapre2
Replying to @Andreamariapre2 @jules1602x and 40 others
Isabelle might know who it was
11:09 am - 6 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1093234536970739712
Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet
Replying to @jules1602x @Andreamariapre2 and 39 others
No, GA in a doc brings it up as one person staying behind every night.
11:46 am - 6 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1093235014550999040
Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet
Replying to @Andreamariapre2 @jules1602x and 39 others
I am in Newport Beach at moment and I will find it tonight when I’m back
11:48 am - 6 Feb 2019
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/6oct7/TIMES_09_10_2007.htm
DeleteThis is newspaper account from Rebelo’s time.
Whatever was said here never made it into PJ files.
I can’t recall any documentary or video where GA commented on this.
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1093329983974432769
DeleteProof came there none .....
Gross deception by McFadden, but then do we really expect anything else? The clip she has posted is from this interview
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbobqyzyUk4
At 2.05 the interviewer asks GA why the McCanns have never been charged with neglect. He asks whether she means in Portugal or in England, & talks about the difference in law between the two On this occasion Jules is correct in stating that he's saying they WERE neglected, and that even looking at it as an abduction, she couldn't have been taken if she wasn't left alone.
Isabelle has always claimed in the past that McCanns were not charged with neglect because the Portuguese wanted to charge them with the more serious crimes, ie accidental death and cadaver concealment. Now she seems to be saying they weren't charged with neglect because GA doesn't believe there was any neglect. She really needs to get her story straight.
DeleteShe also says 'omg' to the comments on her petition, but the link doesn't work, so how she's receiving comments I do not know. Is it a possibility that Isabelle McFadden is embellishing again? I do wonder.
Deletehttps://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093242072482676742
ReplyDelete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
This might help those who are babbling on about bar bills.. Plus the bar bills I previously linked.. #BoneIdle #McCann
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TIAGO_BARREIROS.htm
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dyv53qeWkAEgtKs.jpg
12:16 pm - 6 Feb 2019
[The picture attached to above tweet says:
“The nine individuals, including the family of the missing child, were included in the half pension regime. They had the right to dinner (a menu that included starter, main course, desert and drinks as listed). All aperitifs, and after dinner drinks were paid separately using the credit card.”]
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093266887746748419
This might help with the bar bills also... #McCann
https://shininginluz.wordpress.com/2015/04/17/textusa-irrefutable-proof/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
1:55 pm - 6 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093269177492783104
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @JBLittlemore
Thanks JBL... :) It's facts people want.. Things can't be cherry picked to suit :) #McCann
2:04 pm - 6 Feb 2019
*****
First, it’s with pleasure that we have outed JBLittlemore for what he is. He’s now become a Black Adder’s Captain Darling, hiding in the HQ and sending info to the frontlines.
But let’s start and debunk this “bar tab” defense by using waiter TIAGO ROCHA MARREIROS.
And we will start by asking who is he on the Tapas ROTA? Is he Agapito, Cenoura, David, Tiago, Zé, Cebola, T. Freitas or Joe?
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/T/03_VOLUME_IIIa_Page_605.jpg
There seems to be only 4 possibilities: Tiago or T. Freitas, if real names are used in the rota and ‘Cenoura’ (carrot) or ‘Cebola’ (onion), if nicknames are used.
By the way, both Cenoura and Cebola are common Alentejan surnames. We have never heard of anyone having a nickname of ‘Cebola’ but one must consider all possibilities.
‘Cenoura’ is a common nickname to designate red-heads but is used only at school level mentality. Also have never heard of an adult calling another adult of ‘Cenoura’ unless it’s a real name. Again, let’s consider the possibility because, as the reader can see, it ends up that TIAGO ROCHA MARREIROS can only be Cenoura.
T. Marreiros says he worked on May 3 from 09H30 to 17H30. That rules out all others out. Tiago, was off-duty and T. Freitas and ‘Cebola’ worked from 16H00 to 24H00.
That leaves out ‘Cenoura’ who worked from, says the rota from 09H30 to 18H00. Note, by saying he left at 17H30 without saying that he left earlier than he should have, Tiago ‘Cenoura’ Marreiros implies that he thinks his shift ends at that hour and not a half an hour later as stated in the rota. That means he gets paid for half an hour he doesn’t work. In a month, or 22 working days, means he has received for 11 hours, or 1 day and 3 hours of work he hasn’t done.
But IF Tiago Marreiros is indeed ‘Cenoura’, then look at his working hours all week: 9H30 to 18H00 with 2 days off duty (meaning that taking into account Tapas is closed on Saturdays, this man has 3 days off every week, what a nice job he has found himself…). Absolutely no contact with guests who dined at Tapas.
And yet he has this to say: “That generally were always the same people who dined in the Tapas restaurant, however he possesses, in his work place, registries about all the people who reserved tables and dined in the Tapas restaurant. That in this act, supplies the listings of all the people who dined at Tapas, from the arrival of the family of the missing girl up to 04/05/2007.”
Is he ‘Cenoura’ or isn’t he? If he is, he works during the day so can’t possibly say the above.
If he isn’t, the who is he? We don’t know.
(Cont)
(Cont)
ReplyDeleteShould we trust what he has to say, or shouldn’t we? Should we trust the rota, or shouldn’t we?
Isn’t to trust ONLY some things to cherry-pick? But, no not Jules, remember has said this “Thanks JBL... :) It's facts people want.. Things can't be cherry picked to suit :)”.
And, about “generally were always the same people” only the T9 were, ALLEGEDLY, there every night.
We have 3 families who are listed twice: Bullen, Mann and Weinburger.
But we have 13 families who are listed only once: Burlton, Cox, Edmonds, Foster, Handy, MacKenzie, McCormick, Naylor, O'Donnell, Patell, Sperrey, Thornhill and Totman. Is this consistent with “that generally were always the same people who dined in the Tapas restaurant”?
Is this man to be considered trustworthy or is Jules and Darling, sorry, JBLittlemore going to continue to cherry-pick?
The bit Jules has attached to the tweet is not correctly translated. In fact, the correct translation benefits team Jules and Darling, sorry, JBLittlemore:
“That the nine individuals, including the family of the missing child, were included in the half pension regime, having the right to a dinner (menu that included starters, main dish, desert and free drinks [bebidas à descrição]), being that all other drinks (aperitifs, and after dinner drinks) were paid separately using the access card [cartão de acesso].”
By saying access cards are used to pay the extra drinks (we will come back to this) it indeed implies that a bar tab is run per apartment. In fact, he’s saying that one cannot pay in cash, debit or credit card at Tapas. My experience is that drinks during the day can be paid in cash so not seeing why they that wouldn’t be possible at night.
But let’s look at a detail he says: the menu includes free drinks. All one can drink. ONLY aperitifs and after dinner drinks, are not included. So, if one chose, like the Hynds allegedly did, to make Tapas one’s waterhole one would be able to! For no extra charge!
But this begs the question: if one can drink as much as one wants during dinner, why would one spend money in after dinner drinks? Just keep ordering wine to accompany the meal, and until one order and finishes desert, the meal is ongoing. Does this make any sense? Drinks included in meals that are part of inclusive packages are limited, otherwise it would be a ruinous way to run a business.
But then Tiago ‘Cenoura’ Marreiros, says this: “That the payment of the drinks, not included in the holiday contract, was paid through access card, being this payment done in a random manner between the nine people.”
How does he know? He wasn’t there!
Where is the registry of who paid what? The booking sheets do not express that:
McCann – 242€ (pg 617), 242€ (pg 621), 242€ (pg 625) – on one day up to Tuesday they paid for the group’s AFTER DINNER drinking 242€ (on top of all the free wine during dinner) and then paid no more.
O’Brien – 105€ (pg 617), 105€ (pg 621), 105€ (pg 625) – on one day up to Tuesday they paid for the group’s AFTER DINNER drinking 105€ (on top of all the free wine during dinner) and then paid no more.
Payne – 117€ (pg 617), 162€ (pg 621), 162€ (pg 625) – on one day up to Tuesday they paid for the group’s AFTER DINNER drinking 117€ (on top of all the free wine during dinner) and then paid on Tuesday 45€ and then paid no more.
Oldfield – 21€ (pg 617), 26€ (pg 621), 31€ (pg 625) – the only family who paid for the group’s AFTER DINNER drinking (on top of all the free wine during dinner) every day.
Aren’t there too many people being them to pay for the group’s AFTER DINNER drinking. Note, up to Tuesday, ALL 4 families have paid for the group’s AFTER DINNER drinking! Up to Tuesday, is only Sunday and Monday…
And was there AFTER DINNER drinking on Thursday? The Oldfield’s “bar tab” says that there was, doesn’t it?
(Cont)
(Cont)
ReplyDeleteDoes any of the above make any sense? In Portugal it’s what is called “a badly told story glued with spit”.
But, we are certain that Jules certainly does not want to cherry pick, let’s pay closer attention to what this Tiago Marreiros had to say about something else (our caps):
“That generally were always the same people who dined in the Tapas restaurant, however he possesses, in his work place, registries about ALL THE PEOPLE WHO RESERVED TABLES AND DINED IN THE TAPAS RESTAURANT.
That in this act, SUPPLIES THE LISTINGS OF ALL THE PEOPLE WHO DINED AT TAPAS, from the arrival of the family of the missing girl up to 04/05/2007.”
So, and it was Jules who has raised the possibility of guests of other tourist operators, namely Thomas Cook, to have been in separate sheets that were not handed over to the PJ.
If one is to believe in Tiago Marreiros and team Jules and Darling, sorry, JBLittlemore, evidently do, ONLY Mark Warner guests were allowed to eat at Tapas. Surely, they are not going to cherry-pick now, are they?
To be continued…
Jules and JBLittlemore and the “bar bills”
DeleteAfter bringing in Tiago Marreiros to prove their point with FACT, the wonder duo Jules /Darling-JBLIttlemore, bring in Shining in Luz, AKA as the Ghoul Tour blogger.
Jules says the post she has linked up “takes apart Tex mate... :)”:
https://twitter.com/AndyFish19/status/1093270097211392000
Andy Fish @AndyFish19
Replying to @jules1602x
Can't be arsed to read that, Jules!
What is evident, is that the #Textusa person is some weirdo, full of nonsense & on the job to cause as much distraction/obfuscation as poss!
Can't stand that sort of crap, myself!
On #McCann
2:07 pm - 6 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093270624288628737
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @AndyFish19
It takes apart Tex mate... :)
2:10 pm - 6 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/AndyFish19/status/1093272402790940672
Andy Fish @AndyFish19
Replying to @jules1602x
Good stuff. Will have a read later. Always good to take down a fraudulent weirdo with some facts on #McCann #Loon
2:17 pm - 6 Feb 2019
It is interesting to see used by ‘antis’ against us a blogger who believes that Maddie was abducted.
A blogger who welcomes commentators to his blog such as Heriberto Janosch González, the long armed abductor or the pillow snatcher:
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7GRmtVucWG0/Vywr5HYf1nI/AAAAAAAAOh8/wLYFegpRa2UITrayAuTzkrKh4Rqi4Yc4QCLcB/s320/heriberto1.jpg
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-36fuF0e6aXQ/VywsAEk_CVI/AAAAAAAAOiA/bESCtyLH2cQVElYXzi2UZ6uR5sHJMZrMwCLcB/s320/heriberto2.jpg
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_pkcAwgggyU/VywsGLRqc9I/AAAAAAAAOiE/xha5zxUVmygenHVImrWJke0P-QootxXZwCLcB/s400/heriberto.jpg
This alone shows how factual the wonder duo wants to be when contradicting what we have said.
We remind readers that Heriberto Janosch González participated in Richard Bilton’s BBC documentary last year.
But before we get into details, the link provided by Jules was a response by Shining in Luz to one of our posts where we analysed the tampering of the booking sheets.
The first was the “Irrefutable Proof” on April 17, 2015. We showed clearly that the Booking sheets had been tampered with.
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2015/04/irrefutable-proof.html
As this tampering showed very clearly that the hoax involved the Ocean Club itself, people quickly hurried to try and explain away this tampering with having been due to OCR problems.
We then wrote the post “Definite proof” where not only we showed that the tampering had nothing to do with OCR as we began to show how the number of apartments detailed in the sheets did not tally up with the totals written in those same sheets.
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2015/05/definite-proof.html
Then we did the same with what the wonder duo calls “bar bills” in a post called “Balance: unbalanced”.
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2015/05/balance-unbalanced.html
(Cont)
(Cont)
DeleteAnd then we did the exact same thing with the number of people listed in our post “Missing people”.
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2015/09/missing-people.html
Four posts showing very clearly that the Booking sheets had been tampered with and one, SPECIFICALLY about the “bar bill” amounts.
But which one of those 4 posts those who are against cherry-picked to use against us? The first one.
They chose the Shining in Luz’s response to the first post and not to the third one which was the one dedicated to the subject being discussed.
But let’s see what Jules says is what take us apart. From the link she has provided:
“Textusa started off by querying why such printed lists would exist in the first place, given that reception staff could look up the database at any time. That question basically answers itself – the lists were not for people who had access to the database system. They were for people who did not have access to the system. That would be people like the accountant (checking on the bookkeeper) and the owners (checking on everyone). The prints keep people honest. There’s no getting a bill paid in cash at the end and putting half of it through the till and keeping half for oneself.”
If there’s anything else in that post that tackles the amounts seen on the booking sheets, please quote away.
Shining in Luz, a pro-abductor, seems to know a lot about Tapas and how billing is done in the Ocean Club.
But this is the same Shining in Luz who says he doesn’t know Tapas from any restaurant. He says he was never there. In fact, if shown a photo of Tapas he wouldn’t be able to say if it was or of it wasn’t.
In our post “The messages” we accuse Shining of protesting, correctly, to the fact the Mirror places a photo of Block 6 and says it is Block 5 but remains absolutely silent when in the same article a photo of a bar that is clearly not Tapas is shown as to be Tapas.
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-messages.html
This is what Shining in Luz had to say, on October 17, 2016:
“Textusa then hauls me up for correcting the Mirror article about using a photo of block 6 as the disappearance sight, but failing to point out that the photo above that, supposedly depicting the Tapas restaurant, in fact is not the Tapas restaurant. I did say in my response to the Mirror that I have never been within the Tapas area and never ever visited the Tapas restaurant as was, the pizza place it became, or whatever else might currently occupy the location. The ‘fake’ Tapas restaurant appears to be Hotel Luz Bay in SE Luz.
The interior of the Tapas restaurant might be of significance, but I have not poked around inside it, just as I have not poked around apartment 5A. Poking around is for others, not me.
According to Textusa, when the Sun regurgitated the Mirror article, it misrepresented the Tapas restaurant as the Habana, a popular beach café. The live webcam from the Habana is at http://www.algarveluzbay.com/”
So, he had never been to Tapas but knows how Tapas billing process worked. Fascinating.
This is what Jules and JBLittlemore use as FACT to prove their point.
Lastly, as can be seen again, whenever Jules has something she thinks she can use against us, she IMMEDIATELY does.
Only one exception. The photos and e-mails of the BRT. The proof she says she has sent to JBLittlemore, someone who having dined at Tapas himself, felt the need to be see proof of the BRT after coming up with the ludicrous possibility of 5 small round tables becoming one BRT.
Also good to remind readers that Shining in Luz put this in his blog:
Delete“Heriberto Janosch visited Luz in 2013 and located José da Silva to the second floor of Luztur...”
Those who were disgusted by Bilton’s doorstepping of the so-called suspects, a man suffering from ill-health, can thank SIL’s friend, the pillow-snatcher, for being so helpful in helping the persecution of an innocent and absolutely powerless man.
It seems that it's people like this who Jules and JBLittlemore like to recommend.
Does it matter? For Killa Dog and Karen Sanders, Jose da S was only Portuguese, one of those people whose nationality puts him in the thick of paedophilic activity.
Deletehttps://twitter.com/AndyFish19/status/1093577251139055623
DeleteAndy Fish @AndyFish19
Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx @McCannCaseTweet and 39 others
Hiya. I'm not falling out with anyone (Unless you're a Bennett or a Spade)
Something was said. I wanted proof. That's not happened.
That's all.
Good to have a robust debate now & again to sort the wheat from the chaff on #McCann
#Cheers
10:28 am - 7 Feb 2019
*****
The consistency of an intellectually honest person. Asks for proof. The person gives him something completely different and it’s ok, it’s alright, after all, why demand honesty?
The debate was about whether Mr Amaral had said the kids were altogether in an apartment and not about his beliefs on neglect.
Interesting, isn’t it?
https://twitter.com/gcnjones/status/1093415682996342788
ReplyDeletetigger @gcnjones
Replying to @AndyFish19 @PollyGraph69
Textusa ‘s got a lot to answer for..
11:46 pm - 6 Feb 2019
*****
Threat duly noted and reported.
Don’t forget to say after a tragedy happens “oh, so sorry, that wasn’t what we wanted to have happened…”
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1093477904237973504
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/McCannFacts/status/1093395162007519232
Killa Dog 🌐 @McCannFacts
Replying to @FragrantFrog @CarlaSpade
You know there was no swinging. Spade knows there was no swinging. PJ knows there was no swinging. So what’s her motivation eh? Afraid of Portugals endemic paedophilic reputation being exposed? #mccann
10:24 pm - 6 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1093477904237973504
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @McCannFacts @FragrantFrog @CarlaSpade
Something we agree on at least
3:53 am - 7 Feb 2019
*****
It’s always important to know who is of the opinion that Portugal has an endemic paedophilic reputation.
https://www.iicsa.org.uk/
DeleteOf course, the U.K. has no such problem as Portugal!
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1093564390102585345
ReplyDeleteMadeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet
Replying to @jules1602x @Andreamariapre2 and 39 others
Goncalo has also never changed his mind, he believes Madeleine died May 3rd due to his belief in people he spoke with.
I understand exactly what Amaral believes as I communicate with those closest to him regularly
9:37 am - 7 Feb 2019
*****
Please add to the long list of people who McFadden speaks to directly “those closest” to Mr Amaral.
And she knows EXACTLY what Sr Amaral believes!
But needs to telephone a court clerk to ALLEGEDLY be told if the McCanns had PAID (yes, in English) the court costs!
DeleteWhen backed into a corner she always drops the "I know better than you because all the top people confide in me" bomb. Never fails to bring the faithful to their knees.
DeleteShe has got herself into a right mess over this.
Yesterday:
@McCannCaseTweet
Replying to @justice4maddie @Chinado59513358 and
Amaral had suspicions that children were previously all monitored in one of the apartments. As we know one adult always stayed behind
Today:
@McCannCaseTweet
Replying to @jules1602x @Andreamariapre2 and
Goncalo believes there was Neglect all week long, that’s what he believes , he believes has he said if there wasn’t neglect te children could not be taken
Neglect was the Alibi that night.
Silverdoe un-protects her tweets to ride to the defence of the mistress
ReplyDeleteSilverdoe is desperate to put the Amaral-said-the-children-were-all-monitored-in-one-room debacle to bed. She won't admit that Isabelle lied and she is trying to stop others discussing it. She gets very upset when her heroine's feet of clay are exposed. Fiercely loyal to the point of blindness.
DeleteThis is the tweet that Isabelle McFadden produced to prove that Mr Amaral said the children were all in one apartment:
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1093329983974432769
Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet
Replying to @McCannCaseTweet @Andreamariapre2 and 40 others
Here Andy that’s exactly what Amaral said
https://twitter.com/i/status/1093329983974432769
6:05 pm - 6 Feb 2019
[In Portuguese:
… repare que a questão de segurança é interessante, mesmo pensando só na hipótese do rapto aquela criança não estava em segurança, porque se estivesse em segurança não teria sido raptada. Aquela e as outras…
In English:
... note that the question of security is interesting, even thinking only in the hypothesis of abduction, that child was not safe, because if she were in safety, she would not have been abducted. That child and the others…]
Now, all we have to wait is for to produce where Sr Amaral eliminated the swinging theory and where he said he sat at the BRT.
We will be waiting.
To help McFadden and the children in one apartment thesis:
Deletehttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1565618/New-search-at-Madeleine-McCann-apartment.html
By Aislinn Simpson in Praia da Luz
3:02PM BST 09 Oct 2007
“Portuguese newspaper 24 Horas reported, quoting a senior PJ officer as claiming: "It's not just the evidence gathered which point to the fact of there being more children in the apartment, there is also the evidence duly backed up after interrogation upon the rest of the people who were in the Ocean Club."”
GA left Oct 2
DeleteRebelo took over Oct 9
Senior PJ officer quoted in the article in comment was reported on Oct 9
So more likely it was Rebelo.
But could have been someone in his team.
It wasn’t GA, as he was no longer involved.
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/6oct7/TIMES_09_10_2007.htm
DeleteThis links the quote more closely to Rebelo.
The Times isn’t a tabloid and regarded as reliable journalism.
Anonymous 8 Feb 2019, 12:10:00,
DeleteThank you!
Bringing the relevant quote over to the blog:
"Police believe that Madeleine and her twin brother and sister may not have been alone in the McCann holiday apartment, but that the children of seven British friends who were on holiday with the McCanns were also present when Madeleine disappeared on May 3, the 24 Horas newspaper claimed.
The McCanns, from Rothley, Leicestershire, have insisted that Madeleine was with only her two-year-old twin siblings, Sean and Amelie, while they dined with their friends at a tapas restaurant at the Ocean Club resort in Praia da Luz. The group has claimed that their children were in their own apartments and that they made checks on their own children and those of their friends during the evening.
However, a source within the investigation was quoted by 24 Horas as saying: “It’s not only the collected evidence that points to the fact that there were more children inside that [the McCanns'] apartment.
“Evidence also exists, following the interrogations to the other people who that were at the Ocean Club, that only the McCanns’ apartment was visited by the people who attended the dinner.”
The children had visited each other’s apartments regularly in the six days that they had been at the Ocean Club. The newspaper does not explain how any forensic evidence could be pinpointed to the evening of Madeleine’s disappearance.
The newspaper also casts doubt on claims by one of the McCanns’ friends that he was looking after his unwell daughter when he was away from the restaurant on the evening Madeleine disappeared.
It says that Russell O’Brien, a hospital consultant from Exeter, left the restaurant at 9.35pm and returned at 10pm, just minutes before Mrs McCann discovered that Madeleine was missing. Mr O’Brien has strenuously denied any involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance and has never been a formal suspect in the investigation.
24 Horas reported: “The British man guaranteed he took that long because he visited his sick daughter, and she vomited. He says he asked for the sheets to be changed, but the staff at the Ocean Club assured the investigators that nobody asked for any bedsheets to be changed that evening.”"
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/The_Truth_II/status/1093476025894428672
The Ponce of Dubai @The_Truth_II
Replying to @Joysetruth @EricaCantona7 and 36 others
I have not tagged my posts as I do not feel it is part of the case I’m interested to know how some tweeters demand we accept it was a swinging event .was the person Textusa involved? Is that why they are adamant?
3:46 am - 7 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1093476683510939648
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @The_Truth_II @Joysetruth and 36 others
Excellent point. Although repugnant to consider 😃
3:48 am - 7 Feb 2019
*****
Are those who defend that Maddie was a victim a paedo crime, paedos?
Why would it be repugnant to consider that any team member was a swinger? Isn’t it legal? Isn’t it that no one cares who is into swinging and who isn’t into it?
Karen Sanders is very explicit: swingers are repugnant. We consider defending oneself from others thinking one was repugnant, a secret really worth defending.
Do those who claim children were sedated sedate their own children?
DeleteDo those who claim Satanistic cults belong to these cults? .....
These questions could be asked of any proponent of a theory.
It’s a puerile method of arguing against opponents of various theories.
It’s a non sequitur to make that claim. Does that mean they believe Barra da Costa could be a swinger?
DeleteA ridiculous suggestion, but he explained why he had made that claim without producing concrete evidence and also why he was unable to do so without revealing his source.
https://twitter.com/PFORINNI/status/1091328367683649536
ReplyDeleteLarry @PFORINNI
Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx @veniviedivici
There's been plenty to wrangle over on this tag. Suddenly Textusa strayed from being mad as a bat on his own blog to winding everyone up by replicating tweets on there. Carla's a one-theme swing merchant too but introduced calling all who disagree as "pretendies". Ridiculous.
5:32 am - 1 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/Spinelocker/status/1093882616342827008
Captain @Spinelocker
Replying to @jules1602x
'You're a pretendy because you don't believe in swinging'. Long & short of it. It was crazy enough coming from Textusa all these years. I think there's what, 3 of them now with that insistence. Major prob is, even if it was swinging, who gives a shit?
6:41 am - 8 Feb 2019
*****
Cowards always return.
Spinelocker when dissing McFadden, Pforinni when not. What other IDs?
No infantile graphics in these ids?
From “FB Anon”:
ReplyDelete“https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093627317690220544
So the words from the highest court in the land can be trusted when it says the McCanns are not cleared, but not trusted when they say blood was PROVEN to be found in 5a?”
*****
Bringing the tweet over to the blog:
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093627317690220544
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @MrDelorean2 @BourgeoisViews and 2 others
But I'm only repeating what the SC ruling stated..
Not only that, the #McCann tried to get the ruling annulled on the basis of them believing archive cleared them.. Which was again, as we know 'indeferido' I hope this clears that up... ?
1:47 pm - 7 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093850130539782144
ReplyDelete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @EricaCantona7 @xxSiLverdoexx and 41 others
This one that was in the Tapas before the 3rd May...? #McCann Situated near the bar like the 4th May pic...?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dy4i44pXQAAvPD9.jpg
4:32 am - 8 Feb 2019
[Picture attached is this from Tiago Barreiro’s statement:
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/TIAGO_BARREIROS.htm
“That he knows the family of the missing child as they were clients of the Tapas restaurant which they began frequenting the 2nd day of their arrival to the OC.
From the very beginning, a request was made to the restaurant workers to reserve a table for 20H30 until the end of the week. The request was made for a specific table given the number in the group - nine people. This group would dine daily and always arrive around 20H30. They would leave the restaurant around 00H30.
That the table they occupied is next to the Tapas bar since that table was the biggest.”]
*****
Why does Jules insist on quoting from a man who does not appear on the Tapas rosta?
And why is Jules quoting from anyone at all? Doesn’t she hold the PROOF (photos and e-mails) that the BRT exists and that we have been literally waiting for months for her to show?
This must be the one of the most bizarre tweets we have ever seen on the case. From this person or from anyone else, for that matter:
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093848586020945920
00The Jules... ��️♀️ �� �� �� �� �� �� @jules1602x
It looks like the PJ were only interested in the #McCann Tapas dinners... Glad we got to clear that one up...
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dy4hd60WsAMxl1O.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dy4hee6WoAAximJ.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dy4hfJaWsAAcKm4.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dy4hfaNXQAEXRU7.jpg
4:26 am - 8 Feb 2019
****
The first 3 photos attached seem to highlight the fact that the Tapas reservation sheets have hand-written on top “TAPAS Restaurant”. The 4th picture, for Friday May 4 is shown, apparently to highlight that there is no hand-written “TAPAS Restaurant” on it.
But as everyone knows is not of the same template of the other 3. But above it, written by whoever set up this particular page on http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/ and NOT by the PJ the following “IT IS PRESUMED THAT A NEW BOOK WAS OPENED AFTER THE INCIDENT, OLD BOOK MAY HAVE BEEN TAKEN BY PJ. HENCE DIFFERENT LOOKING FORMS”. And below this also by the same person responsible for putting this page on the site and NOT by the PJ:
“FRIDAY 04-05-07
MCCANN PARTY
03_VOLUME_IIIa_Page_609”
What is it supposed to prove or even mean??
“It looks like the PJ were only interested in the #McCann Tapas dinners...” seems to indicate that this person is making the association that the “TAPAS” in the expression “TAPAS Restaurant” means the T9 and not the name of the restaurant itself!
Does this person seriously think that by May 8 2007 the PJ and whoever wrote “TAPAS Restaurant” on those pages were mentioning the group by already by ‘Tapas9’?
Even if that is the ludicrous idea she’s trying to push, then shouldn’t it have been “TAPAS in the restaurant” or “TAPAS group in the restaurant”?
The files were released in July 2008. Whoever set up the page called them the “MCCANN PARTY” and this person is implying that everyone by May 8 2007 (the day Tiago Barreiros hands over the first batch of reservation sheets to the PJ) they were being called Tapas9, thus the hand-written heading of “TAPAS Restaurant”!
Doesn’t this person realise that the “TAPAS9” were named after the restaurant and not the other way around? That the name came from people saying “the group of 9 who say they dined at Tapas…”?
This tweet, we believe, but Jules may correct us, is just a hilarious attempt to excuse why no Thomas Cook guests or from other tourist operators appear in the reservation sheets. Her reasoning, we suppose, would be this: the PJ were only interested in the McCann dinners at Tapas, and as the McCanns were MW guests, the PJ were only interested in MW guests, so the Ocean Club only gave them the listing with Mark Warner guests!
Now, not even this hilarity explains why, if they were only interested in the days the McCanns dined there, are the reservation sheets for May 4 and onwards are also in the files. It shouldn’t interest them, should it?
And this person and her hilarious reasoning forgets that Barreiros said this (our caps):
“That generally were always the same people who dined in the Tapas restaurant, however he possesses, in his work place, registries about ALL THE PEOPLE WHO RESERVED TABLES AND DINED IN THE TAPAS RESTAURANT.
That in this act, SUPPLIES THE LISTINGS OF ALL THE PEOPLE WHO DINED AT TAPAS, from the arrival of the family of the missing girl up to 04/05/2007.”
We know Jules is very fluent in Portuguese but as far as we know, and we will stand corrected if we are wrong but “ALL THE PEOPLE WHO RESERVED TABLES AND DINED IN THE TAPAS RESTAURANT” means “ALL THE PEOPLE WHO RESERVED TABLES AND DINED IN THE TAPAS RESTAURANT” and not only the McCanns, the McCann group, the Tapas9 nor only the Mark Warner guests but ALL THE PEOPLE.
By the way, the PJ were not only interested in the dinners at Tapas (the restaurant Jules, not the group…) but were also interested in one other dinner which also took place in the restaurant Dolphin’s that night.
Deletehttps://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093937435447316481
Delete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
TeXtUsA... Read the pics again flower.. What else do they highlight....? DOH... #McCann
10:19 am - 8 Feb 2019
*****
Do explain.
Please don’t say it’s the “das 7 pm às 9 pm”. Is that what you want to highlight?
If that is it, you’re only making the bizarre stupid. Are you saying Tapas had many Reservation books?
So, they had another one for 21H00 to 23H00? And one for each tourist operator? And only handed over the one that went from 19H00 to 21H00?
But then mystery solved. Jules gets owned by the Frog:
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093956409065127936
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog @EricaCantona7 and 40 others
OMG...
Pic 1.. OLDFIELD OBRIEN McCANN PAYNE
Pic 2.. Same..
Pic 3.. Same
Pic 4.. No McCann party..
From the MW Tapas dining sheets...
11:35 am - 8 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1093957635890692096
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @jules1602x @EricaCantona7 and 40 others
You need to view the original documents here.http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PROCESSO_3a.htm …
The "No McCann party" was not inserted by the PJ.
11:39 am - 8 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093959217923457025
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog @EricaCantona7 and 40 others
606-610 isn't in them Frog...
11:46 am - 8 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093959529371525120
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @jules1602x @FragrantFrog and 41 others
Oh they am...
11:47 am - 8 Feb 2019
*****
Did she think the NO MCCANN GROUP was written by the PJ? In English???
Does anyone know what this woman is on about???
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093960824757121024
Delete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog @EricaCantona7 and 40 others
That's not proved anything....
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dy6Hj4JX0AAPzS8.jpg
11:52 am - 8 Feb 2019
[And now she’s circled in red what has been written by http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/
“FRIDAY 04-05-07
MCCANN PARTY
03_VOLUME_IIIa_Page_609”]
And NOW has written this:
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093961204865949697
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog @EricaCantona7 and 40 others
The link only goes to the sheets... Are you saying the PJ didn't insert the date, page number etc too....?
11:54 am - 8 Feb 2019
*****
Does this woman even know how to read http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/ ???
Can’t she tell the difference between what is PJ Files and what is website??
This is priceless!
Jules should go to section on PJ files, first box of 4, on the left, which shows original documents.
DeleteVarious people contributed to the documents placed on the translated site, or made comments above the heading of documents on the originals, describing the content, commenting where pages missing ..
Astro, Kazlux Albym...
A treacherous person lives in many camps and survives only upon the arrogance of her hosts.
ReplyDelete"Tragedy springs from its own peculiar sorcery, with treachery, born of envy or ambition, a usual instigator. Treachery is apparent only after the events staged are well over, as we know, its victims dead, or living and smarting under its tricks, realizing too late how they have been misused: if indeed they are ever cognizant of its role, if still players, to this wonder and rue. Most unacceptable is its subtlety, the double-face which double-deals, the Iago perpetrators hidden for decades, smiling the smiles of polite and not so polite society. They nod and wave, heroes to many; sly politicians these Claudiuses. Time favours the Macbeths and forgets the maligned. The former enjoy live, some even oblivious to their lies as being lies, for they prefer to bask in blessings, aping the certainties of creed, cheating death and duty while in pavilions of ease. They succeed on their success, trite or vast; wealth for some, and enviably, fame for the few. The unaware, their victims, float off to obscurity on ruptured vessels of injustice to theater lands unknown, never really knowing why, if the job's done property. Normality is, truthfully, life's whore, readily embraced and conveniently embracing; secretly, it has the clap. Thinking of plot should then give pause. The treacherous cheat fate and re-write, their 'intended history'. Call it fate. They become authors of an illicit story, penmen of their own gods, living their own fresh creation through a new, egregious, utilitarian drama that is untouched by either truth or beauty."
From “FB Anon”:
ReplyDelete“Watched a Netflix documentary last night about Roger Stone- in it said he had to ‘step away from Washington’ as the swinging scandal broke. No one cares about swinging eh? Seems like The Daily Mail does!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6640233/Inside-Roger-Stones-swinging-marriage-posted-ads-online-frequented-sex-clubs.html”
Bringing the article over to the blog:
Deletehttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6640233/Inside-Roger-Stones-swinging-marriage-posted-ads-online-frequented-sex-clubs.html
'Seeking similar couples or exceptional muscular well-hung single men.' Inside Roger Stone's swinging marriage where he posted ads online and frequented notorious sex clubs with his 'insatiable' wife
- Roger Stone, 66, and his wife Nydia were regulars of notorious private sex club Capitol Couples in Washington D.C. in the mid-1990s
- The club often was home to one big orgy with sex acts openly taking place on the dance floor, in back rooms, and even the bar, with porn running on TV sets
- A journalist working undercover at Capitol Couples and his date were approached by a duo who identified themselves as Roger and 'Nikki'
- Not only were the Stones exposed as swing club aficionados, but they were also linked to personal ads to meet other couples and single men
- An ad paid for using Stone's credit card, read: 'Hot, insatiable lady and her handsome body builder husband, experienced swingers, seek similar couples or exceptional muscular well-hung single men'
- Erotic photos showed Stone naked from the waist up and Nydia in thigh high stockings, with one leg up, and a top revealing her ample breasts
- The suggestive photos first appeared in The National Enquirer in a September 1996 issue with the - headline, 'Top Dole Aide Caught in Group-Sex Ring'
- The political confidant and longtime friend of Donald Trump is facing seven charges brought by Mueller including making false statements to Congress
- Did you swing with Roger Stone? Contact us at newsus@mailonline.com
By Jerry Oppenheimer For Dailymail.com
Published: 19:29 GMT, 28 January 2019 | Updated: 23:51 GMT, 28 January 2019
Jerry Oppenheimer is a New York Times best-selling author who has written biographies of such American political icons including the Kennedys and Clintons.
Just off Pennsylvania Avenue, a block from the White House then occupied by Bill and Hillary Clinton, was one of America's raunchiest sex clubs for couples only – dedicated to wife-swapping and uninhibited sex with strangers.
One of the club's regulars was Donald Trump's longtime friend and political confidant Roger Stone and his stunning wife, Nydia, who went by the pseudonym 'Nikki.'
A pleasant lunch place and bar during the week for white-collar Washington, D.C. civil servants in the mid-1990s, the place transformed on Saturday nights into a steamy XXX-rated private club aptly named 'Capitol Couples' where the Stones rubbed shoulders and other body parts with a variety of mostly upscale members.
In the jargon of Roger and Nikki's swinging lifestyle, the club was billed as being 'off-premise,' meaning no sex acts were to take place on the premises. With AIDs still rampant, health officials and law enforcement nationwide were cracking down on such sex clubs, and the use of condoms was being enforced.
But by midnight, the Capitol Couples club had turned into one big orgy, with sex acts openly taking place on the darkened dance floor, in back rooms, and even along the elegant L-shaped bar, with porn videos running in the background on TV sets.
(Cont)
(Cont)
DeleteThe Stones were card-carrying regulars at Capitol Couples and also at one of the raunchiest sex clubs for couples in New York City, Le Trapeze.
At the time, Roger Stone, with a long history of working for Presidents Nixon, Reagan, Bush, was acting as an unpaid senior consultant to veteran Kansas Republican politician Bob Dole's unsuccessful presidential campaign.
Stone had an office at Dole's headquarters and had helped convince Dole to choose the New York politician and one-time professional football player Jack Kemp as his running mate.
Some years later, Dole is best remembered as a TV spokesman for the erectile dysfunction drug Viagra.
Stone's shapely Cuban-American second wife, Nydia, also had platinum conservative political connections. She reportedly served as a personal photographer for President Richard Nixon, and as a photographer in the White House of Ronald Reagan, including for his 1980 presidential election campaign.
It was while Nydia was photographing a Reagan campaign that she is said to have met her future husband, Roger. Love at first sight, they were married in 1992, in the swinging capital of the world, Las Vegas. They held another ceremony in Washington D.C., which Donald Trump and his then-fiancee Marla Maples attended.
In 1996, when word leaked out that longtime political consultant Stone, working for the conservative cause of Bob Dole, was actively involved in the swinger lifestyle with his wife, investigative reporters began looking into their involvement.
A freelance journalist for an alternative Washington newspaper, Scott Baranchik, was working on the story undercover in Capitol Couples with his date, another reporter, when they were approached by a couple who identified themselves as Roger and Nikki. Others had also identified the Stones as regulars at the club.
One man claimed that Stone had struck up a conversation with him at a Republican fundraiser on Capitol Hill in the winter of 1994 and asked 'whether my wife and I like to have a good time.' Stone then handed him a photo of Nydia and said, 'Keep it. It has our phone number on the back. If you want to have a good time with us, call us.'
According to the man's account, Stone mentioned that he and his wife had recently been in California and had 'fun' with a member of the U.S. Marine Corps. Stone told him his wife was 'a very attractive lady and that I could have fun with her, too.'
The man passed on the offer.
While the Stones weren't doing anything illegal or criminal as swing club regulars, his activities were viewed as hypocritical and immoral based on the conservative family values that Dole espoused in his campaign, and that Roger Stone advocated as a Dole front man.
Not only were the Stones identified as swing club aficionados, they were also linked to personal advertisements to meet other couples and single men in what was reported as some 70 swinger magazines and at least one website.
In one such publication, Local Swing Fever, and on a website advertisement paid for using a Stone credit card, the copy read: 'Hot, insatiable lady and her handsome body builder husband, experienced swingers, seek similar couples or exceptional muscular well-hung single men. She's 40DD-24-36; he's 195, trim, blonde, muscular and 8' +. Prefer military, bodybuilders, jocks. No smokers or fats please. Photo and phone required. R&N....We are interested in DC, VA. MD, NYC, Miami, and LA.'
The suggestive photos, which first appeared in The National Enquirer in a September 1996 issue with the headline, 'Top Dole Aide Caught in Group-Sex Ring,' showed Roger Stone naked from the waist up with a black bar over his eyes, presumably to hide his identity. Nydia Stone was photographed in thigh high stockings, with one leg up, and wearing a revealing teddy displaying her ample breasts. In another photo, in which she faces the camera, her breasts are fully exposed, but the Enquirer placed a 'CENSORED' bar across them.
(Cont)
(Cont)
DeleteStone, a longtime adviser to President Trump, was indicted last week on charges of witness tampering, making false statements and obstruction of justice in the ongoing investigation into alleged Trump administration-Russian collusion by special counsel Robert S. Mueller.
FBI agents raided and arrested Stone at his home that he shares with his wife in Florida on Friday morning.
Agents also searched his residence in New York City, said Kristin Davis, known as the 'Manhattan Madam', and according to CNN.
Davis has shared the duplex with Stone but said she wasn't there during the search because she had recently moved out.
Making fun of Stone's arrest, Saturday Night Live's Michael Che, the co-anchor on the Weekend Update segment, referenced Stone's swinger persona. Che said he googled Stone and learned, 'It looks like he pays black guys to bang his wife.'
A reference also surfaced in the recent documentary 'Get Me Roger Stone,' when one of Stone's cohorts observed, 'We might have had a president Al Gore' without the swinger scandal.
After his arraignment on Friday, Stone emerged from the courthouse and shouted a personal truism to a crowd, 'I have always said, the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.'
The Enquirer's expose noted that while Bob Dole was campaigning on the 'moral crises in America,' one of his top advisers, Stone and his wife 'frequent' a group-sex club and post ads in magazines and online 'seeking others to join them in orgies!'
The graphic account went viral, and Stone -- who today calls himself 'tri-sexual, because I've tried everything' -- gave a convoluted and emphatic denial of the stories at the time.
He claimed, among other things, that he and his wife were the target of a political trickster, and that he often was sent sex-related mail.
The photos that were published, he asserted, were sent against his knowledge to a swingers' magazine. He claimed that the online photos of him and his wife were put up without his knowledge and against his wishes.
He claimed the photos had been stolen from the Stones' spectacular multi-million-dollar white brick contemporary home near Georgetown by a domestic who he had fired several months earlier for having a drug problem.
Stone refused to disclose the domestic's name, and threatened that he might sue.
But that never happened and, as a result of the press accounts, Stone was let go by the Dole campaign which stated he could no longer serve effectively as a spokesman for the presidential hopeful.
A dozen years later, Stone finally admitted the truth about the swing club scandal.
In the June 2, 2008, issue of the New Yorker magazine, in a lengthy profile entitled 'The Dirty Trickster,' Stone told journalist Jeffrey Toobin that the swinger stories were all true. 'When that whole thing hit the fan in 1996,' admitted Stone, 'the reason I gave a blanket denial was that my grandparents were still alive. I'm not guilty of hypocrisy. I'm a libertarian and a libertine.'
Around the same time that the Stone swinger story broke, another scandal involving a veteran politico was making supermarket tabloid headlines, and had quickly also gone mainstream -- with sex scandals piquing the interest of the media and the public.
Not long before President Clinton became embroiled in the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Clinton's chief political strategist, Dick Morris, was forced to resign in 1996 after a supermarket tabloid revealed that he had a year-long affair with a $200-an-hour call girl, and permitted her to listen in on confidential calls with the president, and to see advances of speeches made by then-first lady Hillary Clinton.
Stone has long despised the Clintons. Working for the Dole campaign, Stone's job was to attack Bill Clinton's inconsistencies.
(Cont)
(Cont)
DeleteIn an appearance in 1996 on Comedy Central's 'Politically Incorrect' program, Stone attacked Clinton's morals, accusing him of 'hitting on' Nydia at President Nixon's 1994 funeral, the charge shocked the audience.
A dozen years after banner headlines trumpeted, 'TOP DOLE AIDE IN SEX ORGIES SCANDAL,' Roger Stone invited Jeffrey Toobin to conduct some or all of their interview for the New Yorker inside, of all places, a Miami swinger club called Miami Velvet, where a sign read, 'If sexual activity offends you in any way, do not enter the premises.'
Stone revealed that it was in the club, where swingers have sex in half a dozen private rooms, that he struck up a conversation with an off-duty call girl at the bar, telling her he was a dentist.
She mentioned that she almost once had a date with the then-married Democratic governor of New York, Eliot Spitzer, who she claimed was into prostitutes and escorts. The subsequent scandal resulted in Spitzer resigning in 2008, and his wife divorcing him.
Among the various swinger clubs the Stones attended was the legendary Le Trapeze, on East 27th Street, in Manhattan, which first opened its doors in 1980, and where guests could eat around the buffet while naked. A sign read: 'Please cover lower torso at food bar.'
Stone and his wife were well-known to the management. Despite the AIDS epidemic, the club and others continued to proliferate. The New York Times reported in the '90s that clubs like Le Trapeze offered 'anonymous sex with multiple partners,' and there were about 50 such establishments in the city, a third of them with a heterosexual clientele. While legal, they often ran afoul of laws that prohibited on-premise sex.
The owner of the couples-only Le Trapeze told the Times that the club catered to mostly married couples and professionals, ranging in age from 30 to 60, 'looking for sex with other couples,' and that most of them used condoms.
The 4,300 square-foot midtown club was closed in June 2017, and was later gutted by the new owners.
But souvenirs of the club's old swinging days were discovered in the debris, including an enormous hot tub.
The club's owner had been ordered to fill it with cement by a former mayor of the Big Apple, who reigned from 1994 through 2001 and who ruled over the cleanup of the city's sex spots. Hizzoner back then was Rudy Giuliani, today Donald Trump's mouthpiece, and presumably a friend of Roger Stone.
Giuliani called the special counsel charges against Stone, 'Another false statement case? God almighty. I thought they were taking all this time with Stone to try to develop something on him, not a lot about 'I don't remember this,' or 'I don't remember that.' There is no evidence but false statements. The president is safe here.'
*****
A nice short article. It shows VERY CLEARLY how the British press is not interested in swinging!
But then again... if they were not interested in such an uninteresting and legal subject, why did they write this?
"- Did you swing with Roger Stone? Contact us at newsus@mailonline.com"
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093998122467057664
ReplyDelete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @JBLittlemore @xxSiLverdoexx
I think it will be he [Textusa] who will be fretting.. ;) I know you've never been in or near the Tapas JBL, you've never said you have either.. Why does he [Textusa] need to deceive..? I hope he [Textusa] apologises to you for that, as I did for my error earlier.. :)
#McCann
2:20 pm - 8 Feb 2019
*****
Apologise for what?
We have deduced from JBLIttlemore’s words that he dined at Tapas in early Spring/late Autumn. The discussion was about the Storm Curtains at Tapas and JBLitllemore said he had been there with just a jacket. He does NOT make a comparison with a similar situation because being behind any other tarpaulins in any other location does not make an argument for being behind the tarpaulins at Tapas.
What’s the seriousness of saying that someone was at Tapas that it requires an apology?
Why is JBLittlemore so worried that people may think he was at Tapas that year? From his words, it seems clear he was…
We have asked a thought-provoking question “Does Kate McCann write for a newspaper?” but we haven’t yet explained why we have asked it.
ReplyDeleteFor now, we can tell our readers it was because of who we asked and it was because of 2 individuals: Karen Sanders and Silverdoe.
One of these days we will explain how the question links to these 2 but would like to thank them both for being in the opposing camp to ours.
They – and not only them – do more to help spread our message than we could possibly do ourselves. In the short intervals that Silverdoe has her tweets unprotected her we can appreciate the masterpieces from both of them. Very educational, both of them.
Karen Sander’s latest hilarious effort, so keen was she to try and prove the Tapas BRT indeed existed that she did a Darren Ware.
To do a Darren Ware is to create something to clearly disprove a point but then that exact thing ends up proving what was being attempted to disprove.
Darren Ware tried to prove that the reflection of a curved line on the lens of a pair of sunglasses would produce a straight line and ended up showing how curved that reflection would be.
Darren Ware’s foot in the video, sorry, mouth, can be seen in our post “Non-Post”. Betrayed by the reflection he was trying to show didn’t exist. Not only it did exist (as it had to) as he was the one to show us all that in his own video!
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2015/11/non-post.html
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IuxYJ4CcDHI/VkWhK2ZQ1CI/AAAAAAAANO8/6qPYD92AETg/s400/intention.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Lo5Ahq5zngA/VkTElFohIXI/AAAAAAAANKM/BoSUGtoYaso/s400/correction.jpg
Darren Ware was betrayed by a reflection. And now the same has happened to Karen Sanders when she published this tweet:
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1093831263843205121
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx @MancunianMEDlC and 41 others
Here it is as Brunt leans backwards to point out the view of the apartment . Note his full forearm is leaning on the table
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dy4RvB7XgAA5p7D.jpg
3:17 am - 8 Feb 2019
Before we get into the detail of where and how Sanders betrayed herself with that tweet, let’s just step back a minute and not lose sight of what she has done: she has used Martin Brunt as a truth-teller in this case.
Martin Brunt says “I’m sitting at the table where the McCanns and their friends were eating on the night that Madeleine disappeared” and that, according to Sanders is true. End of discussion she says.
And doesn’t that say all? How low must one sink to resort to use Martin Brunt to prove a point that benefits the official story? Ask Karen Sanders.
We are supposing that if Martin Brunt had filmed himself next to the window of 5A, and said that he was next to the window that had its shutters jemmied, that to Karen Sanders would constitute the truth and would be proof that the shutters had been jemmied. To Sanders, Brunt only tells the truth. Brunt for her is a reliable and trustworthy man. To Sanders, whatever this man has said about Brenda Leyland must then also be true. Food for thought for all those putting likes on this woman’s tweets.
As far as we know, this man has only been truthful 2 times in this case. And of those only once in front of the camera and that was when he was in front of the PJ in Portimão in September 2007 but then the McCanns were cannon fodder.
The other time he was truthful, was off-camera. One of them was when he made a phone call we transcribed in our post “The Murat/Brunt Get-together”:
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2012/07/muratbrunt-get-together.html
Other than these 2 times when he was truthful, he has been one of the main people misleading the public about the case. He ranks higher than Antonella Lazzeri and Tracy Kandohla because these 2, unlike him, are not from the “serious media”. He is.
Now, about him and that table he appears to be sitting at specifically in that video of which Sanders has put up a screengrab.
(Cont)
(Cont)
ReplyDeleteAs we have said in the blog, when we first saw this video we thought he was sitting at a REAL big table. ‘Real’ as in it being a real object and not as because it was really big. Anyone who has been at a wedding or at other similar social event knows that big round tables are not a rarity. When we first saw it, we did think that the object was very much real.
Not for a minute did we think it was the BRT.
Our first thought was to think that Brunt had been very lazy as he got himself an oval table to show instead of a round one. So, when our reader Guerra asked what we thought of it, our reaction within team was to say “seriously, he could at least have tried not to insult our intelligence and could have gotten a damn round table, couldn’t he?”
At the end of the video, when Brunt walks out towards the exit, it’s perfectly clear that the usual esplanade furniture was lacking, so it was clear all was staged:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-GgKMxLW4mP4/UJwp6wpIsrI/AAAAAAAADvs/AxyKE9TXlZ8/s400/brunt6.JPG
He even says “this place is shut now for the winter”.
So, perfectly logical to think that Brunt had gotten himself a big table, brought it over to the Tapas esplanade, sat by it and filmed himself saying “I’m sitting at the table where the McCanns and their friends were eating on the night that Madeleine disappeared”, not that much difficult a visual trick to pull off, we would say.
Why didn’t he simply get a round table from the Millenium, for example, and put it there and do what he intended to do?
He doesn’t and instead opts to play around with lights and shadows and with the images in a studio. The only explanation we can find is that there was no big round or oval table at hand that would have a top that would match the rest of the furniture of that esplanade.
The Frog’s picture has shown us how a rough wood top stands out like a sore thumb so Brunt probably thought best to use what he had available and that was something from the original furniture and that was a small round table. Lights and shadows and image manipulation would do the rest to create the illusion of a big table.
Note, and please read above, that we would consider, which we initially even did, perfectly plausible for that table to have been REAL. We have said so. We only say there was visual trickery because there’s clear evidence of the trickery and not because we want to prove that there couldn’t possibly have been a big round table (note the lack of the acronym) ever on that esplanade.
Imagining that there had been indeed a big round table with a similar top from the Millenium and that Brunt would have used it for that video, then we would have had a REAL table being passed on as the BRT. And would that prove the BRT existed? Of course not, because it would have been simply a prop used by Brunt to deceive.
On May 4, as we have seen, the esplanade had the honour of having a big round table only it wasn’t the BRT. It was a rough wood table top put on top of one or more existing tables that was brought there that day specifically for an event. Nothing to do with the tables guests may have used during the rest of the week, those who did which we believe were not that many.
If Brunt had used a REAL big round table on that video it would, again, just be a big round table but not THE BRT.
The fact that we have shown that there was image trickery in that video in our post “Swan Lake – Act 3”, only shows how Martin Brunt wanted to mislead but was unable to get a similar object to the alleged BRT.
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2012/11/swan-lake-act-3.html
So even though it isn’t, it COULD have been a REAL big round table in front of Brunt in that video and that doesn’t make an iota of difference to the fact that the BRT never existed. To be VERY CLEAR, that table could be real and it wouldn’t have been THE BRT.
(Cont)
(Cont)
ReplyDeleteThe fact that people like Sanders (and NT) keep on bleating Brunt’s word as gospel is so, so, telling. Or do people honestly think that Brunt didn’t know there were no Tapas 9 dinners and so there has never been a BRT?
Taking the word of a man who took an active part in maligning a woman and driving her to suicide is sinking low, very, very low.
But, let’s get back to Sander’s tweet. It shows very clearly that the table is not even a real object.
The picture shows supposedly a reflection that cannot be explained by the laws of physics:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-cKQi3mfj98Y/UJz9goTBKRI/AAAAAAAADyM/kfZH3ShJLf8/s400/non+reflection.JPG
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-pp2rLf0PHcU/UJ-FSuKnfhI/AAAAAAAAD1s/kadbbl_I9lw/s400/Sleeve2.JPG
Because it’s not a reflection but the border of the REAL table Brunt was sitting at.
A small round table. By putting only his fist on the table and positioning his arm horizontally, he creates the illusion that his arm is indeed resting on the table while in reality it’s in mid-air.
But physics are physics and the “reflection” is not a reflection and betrayed him and has now betrayed Karen Sanders.
In the picture Karen Sanders has attached to her tweet, the border of the small table is clearly visible. It is not a reflection.
Now, people have one of 2 options. See it or pretend not to see it. There is no other option. Karen Sanders will pretend. That’s what she does on Twitter, pretend. Her mission and probably her job.
All others have a choice: to be on Brunt’s side of the fence or not. It’s the choice each one has to make.
By the way, have readers noticed how since she’s gone full Brunt, the shape of the table has suddenly stopped being important?
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1093941599057440768
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @jules1602x @Spinelocker
That's the thing about swinging, it may have happened or it may not but that table was big. And round (but who cares about the shape). There was never a book by Conan Doyle called Sherlock and the Misshapen Table
10:36 am - 8 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1093933368490844160
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @jules1602x @McCannFacts
I see now they want to argue about the shape hoping we won't notice its size
10:03 am - 8 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1094234260213547008
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @Chinado59513358 @BourgeoisViews and 34 others
So you agree it was large enough to sit round then . Who cares about shapes ?
5:59 am - 9 Feb 2019
The only shape mentioned in the files for the table is ROUND. No other shape. Kate McCann has filled in the names around a ROUND table not of any other shape.
The table the Frog has been trying to push as the BRT, the one of the Event Esplanade, photographed on May 4 is ROUND.
And yet, Sanders now says that the shape of the table is not important. Why? Because Brunt’s table is oval.
But Karen Sanders has a slight problem. She has tweeted BOTH the Frog’s and Brunt’s tables as the PROOF of the BRT and they can’t both be it.
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1094593918711357441
DeleteKaren Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @BourgeoisViews @Joysetruth and 36 others
It’s one thing to tweet about this case to like minded people, it’s something entirely different to print them off and compile a dossier from the sheath of papers
5:48 am - 10 Feb 2019
*****
Is Karen Sanders condemning the truth teller Martin Brunt? Doesn’t Brunt ALWAYS tell the truth??
Brunt's been hovering around this case since the very beginning, he has been misleading the public throughout, Brenda Leyland was only a part of his interference.
Deletehttps://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1094596754698395648
DeleteKaren Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @Tealtraum
I will admit you would have to pretend that TextUsa or MedUsa as she/he/it is known , had a working cerebral cortex, yes
5:59 am - 10 Feb 2019
When the tapas was closed for the winter, the wind shields would have been folded away and the flimsy furniture removed and stored.
DeleteBrunt probably asked for some furniture to be provided for filming a re-creation. Artistic licence, some might say.
If it was the genuine article, the fabled table, it surely would have been shown clearly from different angles?
Whatever prop was used, the surface is shiny. The skirted table had the usual mdf wood-type top, which certainly isn’t.
https://twitter.com/strackers74/status/1094585669542993925
ReplyDeleteElaine Strachan @strackers74
Replying to @FragrantFrog @Chinado59513358
You want to know when sex happened and where? Could you "prove" to me the last time and place you had sexual relations with your other half if you had to? How do you prove these things? ASAP 🙄
You seem very keen to diss swinging & that is VERY interesting.#McCann
5:15 am - 10 Feb 2019
*****
An interesting question to be answered by all those demanding proof of swinging.
Swinging is the engagement in sexual activity by consenting adults.
Like that of between man and a wife. We imagine that many a sex act has happened throughout the years inside the lodgings offered by the Ocean Club to its guests.
Can anyone provide any evidence that can prove this obviously true statement to be true?
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1094887308116021248
Delete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx
It was a V.I.P swinging event, yet they used Madeleines bedroom in PDL which contained 2 single beds, to swing.. Very V.I.P'ish... 😂😂
Laters mate.. I'm off... Be good!!! x #McCann
1:14 am - 11 Feb 2019
*****
There is no such thing as “Madeleine’s bedroom” in apartment 5A. There are 2 bedrooms in that apartment, one which we call the parents’ bedroom and the other the kids’ bedroom simply because that was the way that particular family used the apartment that week.
What that apartment has are 2 bedrooms, one appearing to be bigger than the other. And it’s not only the smaller that has 2 single beds. The bigger bedroom has exactly the same. A total of 4 single beds. Jules should really learn to read the PJ files, we know she struggles with them but this part is not really reading, it’s just looking at pictures.
According to Jules, no sex has ever taken place in that apartment. Only single beds – no sex. Ever. Simply not possible.
I think kids cared for in apartments by nannies and parents went elsewhere.
DeleteThe Mcs may have had events between themselves during the day at one apartments but I doubt posh guests would want to meet there.
https://twitter.com/The_Truth_II/status/1094924082523660288
DeleteThe Ponce of Dubai @The_Truth_II
Replying to @jules1602x @xxSiLverdoexx
300 on those 2 beds? What was it a balancing act?
3:40 am - 11 Feb 2019
*****
Says the person who says there couldn’t possibly have been swinging because the McCanns didn’t bring the right clothes for it…
https://twitter.com/The_Truth_II/status/1094930811260792832
DeleteThe Ponce of Dubai @The_Truth_II
Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx @jules1602x
Too ludicrous for words vip events are small & select not a free for all
4:07 am - 11 Feb 2019
*****
Oh… do we detect some experience here? No advert and fliers?
No matter how many times you say you've never said EVERYONE was swinging, they never listen. Suits them to blow it out of proportion
DeleteWe have no experience of in participating or having been invited to participate in swinging “vip events [that] are small & select”. However, we have transcribed in our post “The paedo offensive” a passage from a book by someone who says she has come into contact with that kind of world:
Deletehttp://textusa.blogspot.com/2018/03/the-paedo-offensive_2.html
“From Natalie Rowe’s book, “Whipping up a storm”, when she refers to her friend Stephen:
“…he was into swinging and took me with him to Paris, to a secret, exclusive and expensive club (the annual membership was several thousand pounds) called Cleopatra. Everyone seemed completely respectable, well-heeled and with reputable careers.... [skipping here explicit details].
Stephen also took me to an even more exclusive get-together in a huge chateau about 45 minutes outside Paris. We drove through huge electronic gates into expensive grounds. This swingers club was for judges, lawyers and politicians- nobody could be a member without being recommended by another member and then going through a thorough vetting by the club. Members, who were sworn to secrecy, could bring a guest but they had to take responsibility for the way they behaved. Anything against the rules and you were immediately black balled.”
https://twitter.com/realnatalierowe
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1094740922942803968
ReplyDeleteGreen Leaper @FragrantFrog
BTW Carla - I'm hoping to obtain some enhanced footage of the BRT featuring guest appearance from Martin Brunt. Watch this space. #mccann
3:32 pm - 10 Feb 2019
*****
From the one who brought us the high resolution picture of the Tapas Event Esplanade, the picture of Lurking Balu taken from the Cristaluz building that does not belong to the Ocean Club, now will come “some enhanced footage of the BRT featuring guest appearance from Martin Brunt”.
What a privilege - how can she get stuff that others can’t?
Unlike Jules, the Frog has always delivered. Up to now at least.
Can’t wait.
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1094738177481498624
ReplyDeleteGreen Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @CarlaSpade
You're being silly. You know the children were there, you know what they were doing. Grey-scale photos in files + others withheld. Now, where & when did this swinging take place? Where were the adverts/fliers for it? Stop stalling & do Tex a favour by proving me a liar. #mccann
3:21 pm - 10 Feb 2019
*****
Adverts/fliers? Seriously?
And would on those advert/fliers appear the name of the VIP who has warranted state-level protection as a “guest star”? Or maybe because there were other VIPs, all their names would appear in these advert/fliers in order of importance like in the movie credits?
What are you going to ask next? Are you going to ask us where did the swingers queue up to have a chance to be on particular night in the same location with their favourite VIP listed in the adverts/fliers?
Oh, are you also going to ask where online are the user reviews from the swingers? You know, after the swinging, the swingers rate the location and fellow swingers from 1 to 5 stars? Shouldn’t that, according to all you proof-demanders of something you know would never exist, exist as well?
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1094976737820188672 Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
ReplyDeleteReplying to @McCannFacts @Millsyj73
I would have thought the OC staff who lost their jobs would have been lining up to sell stories .
7:09 am - 11 Feb 2019
*****
Does this person know someone who has lost his job and wants to sell his story in the UK and can’t? Mr Amaral.
Karen, the Brunt promoter, should stop belittling the powerlessness of the poor.
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1092053003694194688
DeleteKaren Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @DuskatChristie
He can’t publish his book because the McCanns sued him for the premise of the book, that Madeleine wasn’t abducted . The Staff at the OC can’t be sued for the truth, only if it’s a lie
5:31 am - 3 Feb 2019
*****
This what Karen the Brunt promoter had to say about Mr Amaral not being able to publish in the UK, or why the McCanns sued him (according to her that is, because Mr Amaral himself has explained how wrong Karen the Brunt promoter): he said Maddie wasn’t abducted.
So if one can only be sued for the truth, only if it’s a lie then Karen the Brunt promoter is saying that what is the truth is that Maddie was abducted.
And before Karen the Brunt promoter or any of her friends start to say that the fact that Maddie was not abducted was the reason Mr Amaral won, then we ask for the quote from any of the acórdãos from any of the courts involved where it is said that it has been proven that Maddie was not abducted.
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1094946419948093441
ReplyDeleteGreen Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @CarlaSpade
Whatever you say.
So where's the details of this swingers convention? Hopefully you'll be able to post them tonight .
5:09 am - 11 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1094971186625372160
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @CarlaSpade
I'm still waiting for proof it was a swingers convention. You appear to be shifting your stance, Carla.
6:47 am - 11 Feb 2019
*****
About “proof of swinging”, Anne Guedes has already said there would be none available (our caps):
“AnneGuedes28 Jul 2018, 01:17:00
According to you, Textusa, MMC's fatal accident couldn't be brought to light because the following investigation would have revealed the presence in PdL of some eminent persons engaged in swinging activities, then interferring with their right to privacy.
You ask what evidence [of swinging] I would expect. I GUESS THAT BY PRIVACY RULE NO EVIDENCE SHOULD BE AVAILABLE. Then I don't see actually how you can base your hypothesis on anything else than probability. It seems to me that the number of knowing people would help in that assessment.”
But there is someone who agrees with Anne Guedes. None other than Karen the Brunt promoter Sanders:
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1091717347080130560
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @HilaryDean15 @NancyParks8 and 35 others
I don’t think much in this case can be proved , Like the supposed swinging which may or may not have been prevalent. The only thing we can prove is the existence of a table which was both big and round and we know how important the geometry of furniture is
7:17 am - 2 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1091990973192781826
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @Chinado59513358 @McCannCaseTweet and 34 others
Like so much in this case, nothing can be eliminated entirely ( apart from the BRT ) There may well have been swinging, most of us just think there wasn’t
1:25 am - 3 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/DuskatChristie/status/1092018618148081665
SunsetChristie @DuskatChristie
Replying to @EricaCantona7 @Chinado59513358 and 35 others
So you're not discounting the swinging theory then.? You are saying it was possible - I'm so glad to see you are open to it. 😊
3:15 am - 3 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1092019558888685570
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @DuskatChristie @Chinado59513358 and 35 others
I can’t say it it’s impossible, because we simply don’t know , with no evidence to support or debunk it . GA didn’t set much store by it and I can’t believe the staff wouldn’t sell their stories once they had been let go so that , to me , favours the absence of swinging #mccann
3:18 am - 3 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1091373774019141633
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @AndyFish19 @umweltbuerger and 2 others
We can’t say either way about swinging, but at least we can see there is a table , and it’s big and it’s round #tableWars
8:32 am - 1 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1090676010876588039
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @JBLittlemore @Anvil161Anvil16 and 2 others
There may or may not have been swinging , who knows? But I fail to see how the fable of a table proves it . It’s ludicrous in the extreme . We have seen the photo of it in May 2007 , it wasn’t the product of a Jedi mind trick
10:19 am - 30 Jan 2019
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1093155822081851393
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @Chinado59513358 @DuskatChristie and 38 others
I don’t think there was swinging because there is no evidence of it, but none of us can give a definitive answer to that , with
6:33 am - 6 Feb 2019
*****
Sanders couldn’t be clearer and concurs with Anne Guedes: swinging could have taken place and there not be an iota of evidence of it.
Anne Guedes said it was to be expected NOT to be found any evidence.
The table has nothing to do with swinging as Karen LS attempts to link the 2.
DeleteThe non-existent table means non-existent dining and non-existent neglect
Neglect was their alibi, as agreed, previously by the gang.
Swinging is a different subject, as distinct from the dining.
The most usual and obvious tactics of those who oppose us without honesty (we respect all those who genuinely believe we are wrong) is to distort our words.
ReplyDeleteAs we have said, the latest to say we have said there were 600+ swingers.
The other words they try to pin on us is to say we have said that the fact there was BRT, it means there was swinging. We challenge anyone to quote where we have said that.
What we have said is that the absence of the BRT means the Tapas staff have not told the truth. That’s it.
Why they haven’t told the truth is open for debate. We are of the opinion that it was to protect the reputation of swingers present there. But we may be wrong.
For those who believe Maddie died victim at the hands of a paedo, the absence of the BRT and that means the Tapas staff lied, they must believe they lied to protect a paedo who killed Maddie. We don’t subscribe that belief but that’s us.
For those who believe Maddie died victim of sedation, the absence of the BRT and that means the Tapas staff lied, they must believe they lied to protect those who killed Maddie by sedation. We don’t subscribe that belief but that’s us.
For those who believe Maddie died victim of a medical trial, the absence of the BRT and that means the Tapas staff lied, they must believe they lied to protect those who killed Maddie in such a trial. We don’t subscribe that belief but that’s us.
To say that we have said that the absence of a BRT means automatically swinging, is to intentionally distort our words because we haven’t. And that is telling.
To all those now saying that Mr Amaral believed in neglect, we would like for one of them to quote from him where he has said that.
ReplyDeletePlease note, if he has said something like “they say they left the children alone and they said they checked…”, it is not his belief but simply echoing what he was told.
Please show us where he has said: “I believe they left the children alone, I believe in neglect”.
Watch his doc & read his book.
DeleteHave you done that yet?
A lot better than your bollox you spout?!
Andy Fish
(50 spot you won't publish this)
Andy Fish,
DeleteYou seem not to have read the request properly "his doc" and "his book" are not quotes.
Link up the documentary and say at what minute he says he believes in neglect.
Likewise, quote from his book.
No need to further bet if we publish more of your comments or not. If your answer what has been required, we will, if you don't, we won't. Very simple.
Unpublished Andy Fish at 11 Feb 2019, 20:25:00,
DeleteRamble on as much as you like. We don't want you to put on that pathetic show of behaving like a man when demanding FACT from Isabelle McFadden and then end up being just a whimpering little boy begging for forgiveness.
When you provide the quotes, we will publish.
It seems to us strange that a man under fierce legal fire, would commit himself to any theory and risk having to legally answer for it, and if he was so sure of all, had figured it all, then we also find it strange why would he want a reconstruction to be done. Maybe because he didn't believe in what he was being told?
This is like watching white collar boxing.
DeletePetition update:
ReplyDelete1276 of 1500 required signatures on McF petition, which seems to be stalling, is low down on her tweets and not a pinned tweet. This doesn’t show much enthusiasm for her own petition.
Publicly available signatures seem to be less than 300, so even if there are actually the number of signatures claimed, the majority don’t want to be identified as supporters of the petition.
Well done! You and the other pros have almost destroyed the McCann tag. You'll be remembered for that.....and only that.
ReplyDeleteOh dear, oh dear, oh dear... what have we done?? How will we be able to live with our consciences????
DeleteOh, let me call a friend of a friend of a friend of mine who is handy and knows how to fix plumbing and electrical stuff and we're certain that he'll be able to fix the hashtag! Just give us a few minutes...
...oh, just checked and the #mccann is working fine! You liar you! You frightened us for a minute there! Phew...
Comment received that we have censored:
ReplyDelete“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Jules and owning the BRT - Comments continue":
Your blog has been given the seal of approval by none other than Rebecca Sherlock. Imagine my surprise. I told you (censored).
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 12 Feb 2019, 13:14:00”
*****
We will first address the “seal of approval” and then afterwards the reason why we censored the comment.
This is where the “seal of approval” has come from:
https://twitter.com/snook1111pie/status/1095111948314791937
StillAngry @snook1111pie
Replying to @LoverandomIeigh
They reckon she [Sonia Poulton] "smashed it". 🤔Have you noticed the attacks on Textusa now? Agree or not they have never been rude or attacked anyone. The psycho bunny has been calling them every vile name under the sun. He's teamed up with some proper nuts.
4:06 pm - 11 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/LoverandomIeigh/status/1095308076121509889
Rebecca ©️ @LoverandomIeigh
Replying to @snook1111pie
I actually rather enjoy reading the textusa blog. I don't agree with any of their theories regarding the #McCann case. However, the blog & its author has definitely sussed the antis who are only here for attention & games.
5:06 am - 12 Feb 2019 From South Dublin, Ireland
*****
Unless we have unlearnt to read English, “I DON'T AGREE WITH ANY of their theories regarding the #McCann case” (our caps) doesn’t seem to be a seal of approval to us.
The only person who has reacted to this was, unsurprisingly, Karen the Brunt promoter who seems to lack the intelligence to understand the irony when she tweets this boring tweet:
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1095310646760095749
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @LoverandomIeigh @snook1111pie
Don’t they make you sleepy? I always find my attention wandering, although it’s commendable that people take the time to blog about their passions, it’s better if they are interesting enough to make you want to finish the piece
5:16 am - 12 Feb 2019
You speak of being given a seal of approval. If that for you is what that tweet represents, we can hardly try and dissuade such a closed mind but we can say that this is what we call a seal of approval, not of us but of other so-called antis:
https://twitter.com/BourgeoisViews/status/1095348986268053507
BourgeoisViews @BourgeoisViews
Replying to @Chinado59513358 @MancunianMEDlC and 39 others
Textura admitted there's no lab proof that it was blood. She just said it was because the dogs alerted to it. You can't use the dogs' alerts to corroborate the dogs' alerts.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DzN2FrYUcAABG0-.jpg
7:48 am - 12 Feb 2019
[Picture attached is a quote from our post “Super-kid” dated Aug 30, 2013:
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2013/08/super-kid.html
“In fact, nowhere in the PJ Files' FSS' Final Report, does it explicitly say that it was “blood” that was what was collected with the various swabs taken by PJ’s LPC from the referred walls. And floor. And couch.
For the newcomers, LPC is the acronym for Laboratório de Polícia Científica (Scientific Police Laboratory) which is, we would risk saying, the Portuguese equivalent to UK’s FSS.
The FSS' Final Report was supposed to wrap up and conclude about all forensic data within the PJ Files.
So although in the the PJ Files the word "blood" does appear directly related with the DNA vestiges found in Apartment 5A, its conclusive forensic document doesn't mention it.
But the FSS' Final Report also doesn’t say the stains found aren’t blood.
It simply doesn’t say what the stains are made of.
It’s common and popular knowledge, even for those who haven’t followed the case after 2008, that specialized UK Police dogs signaled the existence of blood and cadaverine inside apartment 5A.”]
(Cont)
(Cont)
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/BourgeoisViews/status/1095349757462171649
BourgeoisViews @BourgeoisViews
Replying to @Chinado59513358 @McCannFacts and 40 others
Textura still admitted there's no lab proof that it was blood. The dogs' alerting still isn't evidence to blood since the lab didn't confirm it.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DzN2yuEU0AAa06n.jpg
7:51 am - 12 Feb 2019
[Picture attached is the same quote from our post “Super-kid” dated Aug 30, 2013 on the previous tweet:
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2013/08/super-kid.html]
*****
We won’t get into how BourgeoisViews distorts what we have said because not only the distortion is clear (and telling) as debating with someone who is paid to disrupt is to simply waste time.
The Portuguese Court has determined as proven fact that blood was found in the apartment. Interesting to note BourgeoisViews doesn’t include the paragraph that follows the above we wrote:
“For the hard purist bordering some sort of radical, or convenient, fundamentalism, AKA Black Hats, the dogs signalled the EVENTUAL existence of blood and cadaverine, but for the rest of us, the agenda-free, logical, reasonable and rational people, they did signal the existence of blood and cadaverine.”
This post was written in 2013. The Portuguese courts have said what they had to say about the issue. But what we would like to highlight is for someone to tell us what is the difference between what BourgeoisViews defends above and what is defended by the so-called antis JBLittlemore, Mr Thompson, Andy Fish and NotTextusa?
Isn’t that them getting a clear seal of approval from BourgeoisViews on facts of the case? For us it is.
After Cerb, now BourgeoisViews.
About the censored bit, we inform readers that it contained no insult but it is an obsessive warning to us by this anonymous that we are being betrayed.
DeleteThis person has been persistent in the accusation and this is the 5th or 6th comment we have received on the same subject.
To this person, betrayal has 2 sides.
If one is betrayed after being a mean, gossiping, backstabbing, double-faced, backstabbing individual to the one who is betraying us, then that betrayal speaks more about the betrayed than the betrayer.
If, on the other hand one has been honest, straightforward and correct to the one who is betraying, then that betrayal speaks more about the betrayer than the betrayed.
We know where we stand with our friends and how we are with them. We prefer to trust. Saves time and doesn’t occupy our minds with petty stuff and allows us to concentrate on the facts of the case.
But thank you for your concern, no need to warn us any further.
We believe that NT has passed on his characters to some idiots. The Killa is now just pathetic and NT wouldn’t be this stupid:
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/Chinado59513358/status/1095412253963272194
China doll @Chinado59513358
Replying to @Ntown1976Nick @FragrantFrog and 41 others
Again I repeat, Where the jurisdiction of this case is, Portugal, it is given as proved blood and cadaver in apartment. End of" Are you going to deny that fact?
12:00 pm - 12 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/Ntown1976Nick/status/1095412718524424193
nick Townsend @Ntown1976Nick
Replying to @Chinado59513358 @FragrantFrog and 41 others
"End of"? Are you denying that Mark Harrison knows better than any Portuguese judge? If so, why?
12:01 pm - 12 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/Chinado59513358/status/1095413440489947137
China doll @Chinado59513358
Replying to @Ntown1976Nick @FragrantFrog and 41 others
Are YOU questioning the ability of the Portuguese judicial system? If so, why?
12:04 pm - 12 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/Ntown1976Nick/status/1095413987984986113
nick Townsend @Ntown1976Nick
Replying to @Chinado59513358 @FragrantFrog and 41 others
The PJ knew nothing about the dogs the English deployed. MH knew a fair bit, and said no incriminating inference could/SHOULD be drawn from any reaction of either of them. I'm sure there was a good reason.
12:07 pm - 12 Feb 2019
*****
So, MH who only new a fair bit knows more than a Portuguese judge in a Portuguese court.
We invite all those now saying they know more than the Portuguese judges about what is and what isn’t evidence in Portugal, to go to Portugal and drive on the left side of the road because that’s the way it is in the UK and as the Portuguese don’t know on which side of the road they are to drive without the British showing them, and see how far they will get.
To all those demanding from us proof.
ReplyDeletePlease provide incontrovertible proof of your theory - (insert theory -sedation, abuse..... or any other)
Please state whether you have submitted your evidence to the police force of either country.
If not possible to prove the first, please desist from making the same demand of us.
For example, not a theory but a statement. Andy Fish has repeatedly stated that Walker is Wright. We wait for him to provide incontrovertible proof of that.
If he doesn’t, he’s nothing more than a hypocrite when he demands from others, not only us, proof of anything.
Same goes for the rest.
Something is an undeniable fact of this case: it cannot ever be said that Jules cannot sink lower.
ReplyDeleteDo readers remember how after Mr Thompson decided to help spread the “cottaging” rumours against Mr Bennett, Jules decided to show how witty she was by accusing Textusa of having and affair with Mr Bennett?
Then we said that was as low she would sink. To prove we admit mistakes, we admit that we were wrong. She can and has just sunk lower:
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1095440970227896320
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @EricaCantona7 @MancunianMEDlC and 41 others
Does anyone know the outcome of this on #McCann Genuine question... ?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DzPJwA2X4AE11Yp.jpg
1:54 pm - 12 Feb 2019
[Picture attached to the tweet is a screengrab quoting a post by NotTextusa in its entirety:
“Saturday, 8 June 2013
Why did you never tell your regular posters that you were being investigated, Textusa?
Do you not think they had a right to know that child protection agencies were investigating your blog?
After all, you knew about it. Were they not entitled to the same?”]
(This tweet was liked by @Andreamariapre2, @Joysetruth, @EmmaJJW, @EricaCantona7, @xxSiLverdoexx and 1 user has asked not to be shown; and retweeted by @Andreamariapre2, @MichaelBWanker, @EmmaJJW, @xxSiLverdoexx and 1 user has asked not to be shown.)
*****
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1095442169974919170
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @jules1602x @MancunianMEDlC and 41 others
They were being investigated? Was it the sudden rush of suicides after reading the blogs? Or just the comas that their readers couldn’t be awoken from?
1:59 pm - 12 Feb 2019
(This tweet was liked by @Joysetruth, @Joyousb90, @xxSiLverdoexx and @MancunianMEDlC)
*****
https://twitter.com/MichelleStrach6/status/1095446433925345285
Michelle Strachan @MichelleStrach6
Replying to @EricaCantona7 @jules1602x and 42 others
Karen , that’s uncalled for . “ the sudden rush of suicides “ . No matter what we think of others blogs, posts on fb or twitter . No need for that .
2:15 pm - 12 Feb 2019
*****
This time Jules was accompanied by Karen the Brunt promoter.
This accusation that the blog had been reported appeared in our post “Mind your Ps”.
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2013/05/mind-your-ps.html
The comments are there for all to read but will bring the relevant ones over, so readers can make up their own mind about this accusation:
Anonymous29 May 2013, 18:45:00
#101
Textusa identified the girl
She claimed the girl was a victim of child abuse and the article was accompanied by a photo of a child cringing in fear and the words ''because things went awfully wrong for daddy's friends''
She accused the girl of lying in her statement
She stated that the girl was told to lie by her parents
She accuses the child of covering up the death of another child.
She does all this not on the basis of any evidence at all, but to fit her ridiculous theory.
It is for these reasons that Textusa and this blog was reported to various child protection agencies and that you were, and continue to be, investigated and monitored.
Textusa was informed of this. She chose not to tell you
*****
Anonymous29 May 2013, 18:52:00
Let me explain to you how evidence works
You think someone is lying
In which case you present your evidence and allow the jury to decide.
What you don't do is claim as a certainty that they have lied because it suits you to do so, then demand that someone proves otherwise.
Textusa made the claims. It's for her to prove, not others to disprove.
It was her claims that led to the blog being on a child protection watchlist
(Cont)
(Cont)
ReplyDeleteAnonymous29 May 2013, 19:20:00
Insane,
Now Textusa is on a child protection watchlist?
Wow! British, Portuguese... or Interpol? Also in the CIA dark list?
You've said more than is bearable to read that "she chose not to tell you". Has it crossed your mind why she's now publishing you saying that time and time again?
Other than the fact that it shows how ridiculous you're being?
You really must think you rule the world, don't you?
Do you really take yourself seriously?
Give my best regards to Julius Caesar, would you?
*****
Anonymous29 May 2013, 19:38:00
"It was her claims that led to the blog being on a child protection watchlist".
What a joke. If a child protection spends a second watching Textusa, did not deserve to be considered a child protection and did not deserve a single Pound or Euro that falls on his account.
There is nothing wrong on that blog. She did not made up stories. She debunked the stories other delivered to geopardize the work of the police. That is the problem, for all the Insane.
When they planned their campaign to fool the police, the public and hide the truth, they never put blogs like Textusa on their equation. They forgot that somewhere could be some people thinking, debunking and refusing to swallow their fantasies.
Textusa was pointed by Paulo Sargento on the TV, as a reference on Maddie investigation. Then who is monitorising Textusa apart of you Insane and all involved on the cover up? Which Child protection? Because I'm ready to complaint about that child protection and his poor work on the defense of the childs rights.
I know, you are not able to provide us the name of that child protection or is it the Findmadeleine's Fund?
*****
We mentioned again this issue in our post “Clueless… or NOT”
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2013/06/clueless-or-not.html
““Mr Collins's "Vanished" is a rubbish that, according to Team Insane, doesn't need permission from the McCanns or Mitchell, nor, apparently, from the Ocean Club and ex-Pats as Mr. Collins does include them in his "insightful" non-fictional novel (or rubbish) but on the other hand whatever we write here is subject to permanent libel threat and even under supposed tight surveillance from many a child protection agency.”
This whole child protection surveillance threat stemmed from our post called “Child abused”.
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2012/03/child-abused.html
The readers can read it and make up their own minds about there was any reason for us to have been, ALLEGEDLY, reported to some unnamed child protection agency.
We will only say that we are very happy to have people like Jules, who doesn’t know how to read the files, and Karen, who promotes Brunt, opposing us. If they were on our side of the fence, we wouldn’t hesitate a second to distance ourselves publicly from these disgusting individuals.
The fact they need to sink so low makes us feel pride, as they show they have nothing else to resort to.
Needless to say, we won’t say that Jules won’t sink lower. We are certain she’ll find a way. She’s in good company to find a path in that direction.
Answering Jules’ GENUINE QUESTION, it was NotTextusa himself who claimed to have reported the blog, so he’s the best person to ask what became of his complaint as we heard nothing.
Look at who’s helping Jules out:
Deletehttps://twitter.com/McCannFacts/status/1095673584796737536
Killa Dog 🌐 @McCannFacts
Who'd have thought it? TEXTUSA being investigated by child abuse authorities in Portugal. He kept that quiet. XXX #mccann
5:18 am - 13 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1095623024265650176
ReplyDeleteKaren Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @Chinado59513358 @PollyGraph69 and 41 others
You can’t back up your theories with evidence though. It’s just simply not enough to say there was swinging without any evidentiary support
1:57 am - 13 Feb 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/Chinado59513358/status/1095629344372867072
China doll @Chinado59513358
Replying to @EricaCantona7 @PollyGraph69 and 41 others
Care to read THIS then Karen? http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/oa/OA5_1/o_apenso_1_Vol_5_p875.jpg
2:22 am - 13 Feb 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1095631017719795712
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @Chinado59513358 @PollyGraph69 and 41 others
You’re saying every single one of those searches is a legitimate proof of swinging ( or your definition of it ) ?
2:29 am - 13 Feb 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/Chinado59513358/status/1095631319244115968
China doll @Chinado59513358
Replying to @EricaCantona7 @PollyGraph69 and 41 others
Read it yet??? http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/oa/OA5_1/o_apenso_1_Vol_5_p875.jpg
2:30 am - 13 Feb 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1095635773032927232
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @Chinado59513358 @PollyGraph69 and 41 others
And the link to Malinka is?
2:48 am - 13 Feb 2019
*****
Let’s stick to the files, they say.
Let’s stick by the PJ all the way they say.
Shown something that is from the files, ordered by the PJ and they question its legitimacy.
And then ask where’s the link to Malinka taking into account the forensics were done on computers seized from him and Robert Murat.
This from a person who claims to have a higher IQ than the rest of the humanity.
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1095636654528831493
DeleteKaren Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @Chinado59513358 @PollyGraph69 and 41 others
Again I ask , why can’t you answer the question? Are all those searches legitimate searches for swinging , by your definition , from Malinka’s computer ? @Chinado59513358
2:51 am - 13 Feb 2019
KLS doesn’t understand PJ files and why just googling certain words does not produce results like:
Delete“Swinging searches on Malinka’s computer”
It takes knowledge of where to search and patience in working through material that may not be indexed in detail, or translated.
Her friend Silver claims to know how to research, so why not ask her?
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1095661516299345920
DeleteKaren Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @rambojambo9 @Anvil161Anvil16 and 41 others
I’m going to read the first blogs but they won’t answer my questions, they just send me links to searches from Malinka’s pc. I can’t see that is proof #mccann
4:30 am - 13 Feb 2019
*****
See how Karen, the Brunt promoter, is trying to pin the “swing” results on Sergey Malinka?
The computers were seized from both Sergey Malinka AND Robert Murat and the files are not clear about the ownership of each hard drive, as we showed in our post “Why swing?”
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2014/04/why-swing.html
“3. Third surprise was the fact that it isn't clear in the PJ Files to whom each computer belonged to.
We honestly expected ownership to be stated perfectly clear.
If computer “588” was clearly said to be from Malinka, about all the others it only an educated guesscan be made .
We won’t do that because we think that in this instance only with absolute certainty should one state to whom each computer belonged to.”
Why is the Brunt promoter trying to leave Robert Murat, who was the only arguido then, out of the search for “swing” in the seized computers?
Unpublished Anonymous at 13 Feb 2019, 13:20:00,
DeleteProvide the links AND the quotes to prove what you say is in the files, then we will publish your comment.
Don't forget that somewhere in the quotes the word "thumbnail" has to appear.
Oh, and yes, you are our clerk.
Anonymous,
DeleteI’ve been outvoted by team. They feel it would be best to publish your comment, so here it is:
“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Jules and owning the BRT - Comments continue":
The files are perfectly clear, you just need to be able to read properly. The search results Carla keeps quoting were from Malinka’s computer, and they are temporary internet files due to thumbnail images on a porn site. There is nothing of interest whatsoever.
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 13 Feb 2019, 13:20:00”
Reasons to publish your comment were:
Interesting all the refs to places in the UK as well as swinging houses in the Algarve, a very specific porn site!
Anon should be asked which porn site is comment referring to and how does this person know?
Murat has Redclouds porn on his computer, as PJ files show this.
The fact that we have published your comment does not invalidate you give us the links and quotes we have requested.
By now readers have noted a pattern: anything that is related to swinging is excusable, probably is this or that and has no connection to the case.
Anything else, be it related to paedo, sedation, medical trials, any little thing however remotely related is important and decisive. Interesting, isn’t it?
https://twitter.com/ericson_niklas/status/1095641979222929408
ReplyDeleteNiklas Ericson @ericson_niklas
Replying to @EricaCantona7 @Chinado59513358 and 41 others
I have no idea if they were doing swinging or not but I've talked to Sergey and I asked him if he knew anything about a swingerparty but he refused to answer that question.
3:12 am - 13 Feb 2019
*****
Why did Malinka refuse to answer that question?
Why aren’t you and all others making the same assumptions in this case, about the refusal to answer questions you make when it comes to Kate McCann refusing to answer questions?
The difference is that Kate McCann when she refused to answer the questions she was just exercising rights the arguido status gave her, while in this case Malinka just ran away from the question. Why not just answer it?
https://twitter.com/Chinado59513358/status/1095654120193773568
DeleteChina doll @Chinado59513358
Replying to @ericson_niklas @EricaCantona7 and 41 others
Maybe that silence is very telling.
4:01 am - 13 Feb 2019
*****
In Kate’s case they don’t say there’s a “maybe” do they?
https://twitter.com/Tassie666/status/1095659402206441473
DeleteCaroline Smith #MMJC @Tassie666
Replying to @ericson_niklas @EricaCantona7 and 41 others
Interesting that he refused to answer Niklas. A bit like Gerry's reply as to whether he knew Murat or not. Sounds like he knows more than he is willing to speak about.
4:22 am - 13 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1095642577557250049
DeleteSheLLxx 💯 #MMJC @xxSiLverdoexx
Replying to @ericson_niklas @EricaCantona7 and 41 others
I spoke to Sergey too, and I think he's personally a genuine guy who got caught up in something he shouldn't have. Even if there were swinging, imo, it's not taboo etc.
3:15 am - 13 Feb 2019
*****
And look who comes to defend Sergey Malinka, the man who wanted to publish a book stating he had been tortured by the PJ, tortured by the investigation that was under Mr Amaral’s responsibility.
And yet this woman is ALL for the PJ, ALL for Mr Amaral! And we, according to her, are the ones who are not. Go figure.
Another one who doesn’t know how to tell the difference between the PJ Files and the McCannPJFiles site!
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1093957635890692096
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @jules1602x @EricaCantona7 and 40 others
You need to view the original documents here.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PROCESSO_3a.htm
The "No McCann party" was not inserted by the PJ.
11:39 am - 8 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1095662049139589120
Karen Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @FragrantFrog @jules1602x and 40 others
Who inserted them, LG?
4:32 am - 13 Feb 2019
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1095664277195816965
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @EricaCantona7 @jules1602x and 40 others
The translators + site admin. Don't forget what we see is not just the original Portuguese documents as per the released DVD.
4:41 am - 13 Feb 2019
*****
The exact same admission that forced Jules to swallow this humble pie:
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1093965008147566592
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌🌸🐌🌸🐌🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog @EricaCantona7 and
Ok got you now lol...
I just got owned by Tex..
👋👋Hi Tex... xx
http://newstrack.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/04/Tweets_2018.jpgAt least I can admit when I'm wrong... #McCann
12:09 PM - 8 Feb 2019
Do these people even glance over at the files before typing what they are told to type??
http://newstrack.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/04/Tweets_2018.jpg
And then they STATE there's no evidence of swinging in the files!
DeleteHow would they know?
And do note who is educating them: the Frog!
Deletehttps://twitter.com/McCannFacts/status/1095674444343848960
ReplyDeleteKilla Dog 🌐 @McCannFacts
Hey TEXT, didn't find the IRA quote? Here, I'll help you. XXX #mccann "Today we were unlucky, but remember we only have to be lucky once. You will have to be lucky always."
5:21 am - 13 Feb 2019
*****
Threat noted and reported.
May this weigh on the consciences of all who have sided with this.