Serial Journalism

Remember our May 2009 post “The McCann Game, shortly out of tricks?” where we tried to show how every “trick” played meant there was one less to be played?

That post is now 56 months old.

With the exception of the book (a possibility we never thought possible to be stupid enough to write such a thing) we have all this time witnessed repeats of the same tricks, over and over again: another sighting, another documentary, another presence in a TV show and another suspect.

A sick and desperate merry-go-round to stall the inevitable: the material truth as to what happened.

But this is having another effect. One that complicates all for the Black Hats.

With each bogus scenario, SY moves away from any possible simple solution. With each absurd story the final version moves closer to having Maddie being abducted by aliens. That’s about the only thing that we haven’t seen in the papers. Yet.

You see, absurdity comes at a price. Absurdity eliminates absurdity. For example, we had a burglar and now we have a gang of 3. Will we have a gang of 5 next? Or will we have another gang of 3 in the area in direct competition with the first one?

No, the burglar theme has run dry with the 3 Burglars.

We had Hewlett. We had a family, from Brazil if we’re not mistaken. We have had gypsies.

And we had Tractorman. About this man it must be said that a human being has passed away never realizing that his name will forever be linked to the crime of 21st Century for absolutely no reason at all besides having worked once in the resort from where Maddie died and then disappeared.

Lest we forget, Tractorman had exactly the same media coverage the 3 Burglars are having. National news. Mainstream Media.

With Tractorman and the 3 Burglars, whoever is responsible for such nonsense, has achieved one thing: whoever made Maddie disappear can only be a Genius of Evil.

Only a Genius of Evil could force into to the role of fools 2 criminal police forces of 2 countries: PJ and Scotland Yard.

Neither force was able to solve this problem no matter the ridiculous amounts of time and resources made available to them.

In 2007, cell phone calls in Portugal were expensive. We don’t know the number of inhabitants PdL had at the time nor how many of them had cell phones but taking into account an elderly rural population and fixed lines in residences, saying there were thousands of calls from cell phones from East of Lagos to Sagres on May 3rd is ridiculous. To state this about PdL alone is to be in a hallucinogenic state and having accepted the role of court jester.

To come up with the 3 Burglars from cell phone information, unless proven otherwise, the only info provided by this type of info is number of destination, hour of call, duration of call and nearest antenna, staggers the mind.

One can only state publicly such a thing when one simply doesn’t care about one’s credibility anymore.

Then, not enough, a burglary ends up in an abduction without anything being reported missing besides a human being. The term “burglary” automatically excludes any pre-planning as to what pertains to the alleged abduction.

Either it was an unexpected abduction resulting from a bungled burglary or it was an abduction in the first place.

Apartment 5A is not exactly the Louvre. Not exactly filled with corridors filled with objects worth millions from which one has to choose as one cannot simply take all. In an apartment where tourists are staying there are two locations maybe: the parent’s bedroom and the living-room.

As nothing was reported stolen, nor was anything dropped on the floor, it seems the burglar was surprised at the start of the burglary.

To state that a burglar, surprised by a 4 yr old, would choose, when fleeing, to pick up a worthless 15kg package is, again, only when one simply doesn’t care about one’s credibility anymore.

Even if the burglar was needlessly violent to the child who surprised him to the point of killing her why on earth would he pick the body up and take it with him?

The 3 Burglar is doubly over-ridiculous. It can ONLY come from someone who simply doesn’t care about his credibility anymore.

The 3 Burglar story has one immediate consequence: the official version, if persisting in falsehood, simply cannot be simple anymore.

As we said, only a Genius of Evil could drive a national police force into such an embarrassing position. Befuddling and confounding the SY into mistaking him for a rif-raf gang of 3.

And a Genius of Evil simply cannot have tied knots around 2 police forces, for 7 years and after literally millions and millions of taxpayer dollars (to use this currency as reference) and millions of private ones, with a simple plot. It has to be complex, very complex.

It will make history as to how brilliantly masterminded it was. It just has to be.

SY did sift through “thousands” of cell phone calls and selected those of 3 people. For that to be so, ALL others were deemed less important. Now, after this painstaking analysis, to come up with OTHER important calls is beyond ridiculous.

After each ridiculous episode the next ridiculousness to be used has to be more ridiculous than the last. There’s no limit to ridiculousness but there is such a thing as being too ridiculous. A threshold of absurdity that leaves absolutely no doubt about its non-veracity.

After Pimpleman there can’t be any more lurkers to be spotted. After the 3 Burglars there can’t be more burglars.

They have run out of stories. The well dried up with Tractorman. A literally far-fetched character (he, in our opinion, did serve a purpose which we will abstain from referring to here) with an imagination-pulling connection to the affair.

Tractorman was already stretching it too far. After Tractorman, it’s no longer stretching, it’s plainly and openly fibbing, no longer caring if one is seen lying.

And this care-factor is very important because losing it means we start to witness openly and transparently one of humanity’s oldest crimes: the Serial-Journalism.

This is when a news medium uses its space to intentionally deceive. This is very much used in countries overtly non-democratic or in those of suspicious democratic regimes. But is also used in those said democratic.
 
With Maddie, it was worldwide. Simply staggering.

Lest the media forgets, or pretend not to notice, in the Maddie Affair they are accessories to obstruction of justice.

Yes, we all know that the Mainstream Media (MSM) has been covering up for the BH from day 1.

On those first days, short-leashed but with the foot pressed hard on the gas pedal, it exploited all possible sentimentalism from the parents’ “sufferance”.

Loose-leashed during the “McCann Hunting Party 2007”, they went for the McCann jugular.

Short-leashed again during the “Great Maddie War”, they tried to prove that rats weren’t rats when everyone could see that they were rats. Never has humanity witnessed such collective behaviour.

On the current “McCann Hunting Party 2011”, their position has been ambiguous. Simply because no one has known on which side of the fence to sit. But to be on the safe side, the leash is short.

Very quickly it was realized that the McCanns were far from being the easy fish to bring in as they appeared to be. Not because of themselves but because of those who stepped forward to cover up the events in PdL. The couple are still criminals at large.

About Maddie, as of day 1, the MSM hasn’t published news but propaganda. Hard, raw propaganda.

Propaganda has always a master, an enabler and a target.

We, the public, were the target, the MSM the enabler. Whoever is the master and why the master became a master is not up to the target to clarify but for the enabler to do so.

This propaganda, disguised as news, is to one day to be justified by the MSM playing the offended virgin, claiming they were fooled by the most disgusting people on earth, the McCanns.

The 3 Burglar story has stopped that short. Or better said, the 3 Burglar story AFTER Tractorman.

To publish such ridiculous stories, even if only to keep the issue alive, the MSM has demonstrated that it simply doesn’t care anymore about its credibility.

This absence of a minimum amount of care takes them from fooled to foolers. Premeditated foolers. About the death of a little British girl.

Having overcome the threshold of ridiculousness, they went from prisoners of interests into collaborationists. From victims into aggressors.

Into active participants of a criminal cover-up. The biggest cover-up of all time. The first global cover-up, because it was them that made it global.

Even if with the stories published the MSM was used, and is being used, as message boards, as we think it was and is, sending useful messages to selected destinations so as to move us all towards the path of truth, all is but a game.

A sick game that should have never have taken place. A game played with a light heart forgetting the board where the dice is thrown is laid upon the crime of covering up the death of a little British girl, daughter of two medical doctors.

Serial-Journalism at its best and its worst.

With Maddie, the media became the main instrument to commit the crime of obstruction of justice. A platform of crime.

It’s no longer looking the other way, it is taking active part in the criminal activity.

Each story a crime. Each journalist a criminal.

The excuse of saying that you are just saying what others have said is beyond lame. You know you have your own public so you're actively and intentionally disseminating a deceiftful message. One that you know beforehand that is deceiving.

Obviously, the MSM won’t ever be prosecuted for this crime but it won’t avoid the condemnation from the public trial that is now ongoing. Not one involving a mob with ropes or tar and feathers, but the one that is being made at this very moment by intelligent people, all civilized and responsible, who have lost faith in a justice system that has allowed this even to have existed and no longer seek the MSM to know credible news.

Today people use social networking to obtain their news and look at MSM to see if it's endorsed. Tomorrow not even that.

Negligence 1

We are witnessing in other parts of the internet that people are coming around to this blog’s position back in March 2010, with our post THE CHARGE WILL BE :::::SIMULATED NEGLECT TO PROVE ABDUCTION

Then we said that negligence was simulated by the T9 as for each night one of the Ts was reported being absent from the BRT. This meant that the T9 could later claim that they had lied about the motive of these absences as the real reason they would say was to watch over the children

What we now call negligence-but-not-negligence or simulated negligence intra-T9.

It’s been said no parents would make themselves look bad by saying they left their children alone several nights in succession.

As Kate's book makes it clear, she believes in pre-planned abduction, after the abductor read a note in the reception book, saying children left unattended. The note we claim did not  exist, and yet Kate claims she saw it when reading the PJ Files.

The T9 had to allow for a habit of leaving the children on more than one night for the abductor to detect a particular pattern of checking.

The neglect scenario was the only option that allowed for this, and it had to be more than one night.

How strange if they had said, the one night we left the children unattended was the night she was taken.

Persistent neglect was a huge gamble, as it risked other charges, hence the checking routine was devised and shoe-horned into the 2 timelines.

But it was the necessary price to establish the pre-planned abduction. This is their triumph.

The word neglect is synonymous with the Maddie case. Some support it because it has been hammered home so successfully, others because of ulterior motives.

What has changed in our opinion since March 2010? Very little.

We still think that the “negligence” theory was concocted by very few. In March 2010 we thought it was only the T9, now we think it was the T9 plus a couple of people, three at the most. The “negligence” theory was born hand in hand with the abduction theory.

There's a problem with this negligence-but-not-negligence or simulated negligence intra-T9 theory and that is it still does implicate negligence. Real negligence.

One doesn’t leave children alone because of fear of abduction. That is bogeyman given life by the Maddie affair.

One doesn’t leave children alone because of fear of accidents.

If the T9 have only lied about the motive why an adult was absent from the Tapas dinners, then they have to justify why ALL the children were left alone on May 3rd.

According to their statements, ALL T9 were present for dinner that night. So between the time the Paynes left their apartment (last to arrive at dinner) and the time the first check was made, ALL the T9 children were left ABSOLUTELY alone in the apartments.

Left alone, not to go to the end of the street to get something quickly but to have dinner.

According to themselves, all T9 are guilty of negligence no matter how one looks at their statements. Exactly on what would become THE fateful night.

Also, IF there was an adult tending to the children, how was it possible for Maddie to have disappeared?

Was she set aside from the others? Why? Because she was difficult? That’s an odd way to punish such behaviour… to leave her alone in a strange apartment in a strange country.

And, if so, doesn’t that constitute negligence by itself?

The simulated negligence intra-T9 or negligence-but-not-negligence is as fictitious as the abduction. It was a story, with very small legs, made up to lean on when the charge of negligence was to come.

What pleases us is seeing people slowly catching up with all our theories. Even if pretending that they didn’t read it here first.

Now, there's only a small step to take before coming to the same conclusion as we: there was never any neglect with any of the T9 children, in the nights they were taken care of by professionals along with other guests' children

Negligence 2

The Maddie case has benchmarked many things. Whenever a child goes missing, we think of Maddie. Whenever there's child neglect, we think of her too.

On Jan 13, WalesOnline reported that it was used by the defense in Court that because of the McCanns it shouldn’t be considered neglect leaving a 5 yr old child alone at home.

We will not comment on the details of the case and will trust the Probation Officer’s recommendation as we trust investigated all circumstances surrounding the case.

What is relevant to us is the adequateness of the argument.

This case will forever more haunt Britain. Even when the parents will be charged, among other things, with neglect, it will still have to be explained why it took so many years to discover the obvious.



Dogs in Germany

Another Maddie benchmark. Whenever we see cadaver dogs doing their wonderful work, we think of Maddie. Be it in a human tragedy or in any criminal case.

On Jan 16, MailOnline reported that in Germany, cadaver dogs found a body hidden behind a wall: ‘As a result of this we decided to do some investigations at the family home in Konigswinter, near Bonn in North Rhine-Westphalia. That included using a digger and dogs specially trained in looking for corpses, which resulted in a new cellar wall being dug out, and as a result a woman's body was found.’

It just couldn’t get more ironic. The guilty husband came forward responding to the appeal made by Maddie’s German Crimewatch, claiming that his wife had disappeared.

He forgot he was in Germany. If he had been in Britain, he might just not only have gone away with it as could have ended up a national hero.