To Tony Bennett
Sir,
You and we, apparently at least, have significant differences of opinion about the genesis of the Maddie Affair, but that shouldn't, in any way, be an obstacle in us recognizing your courage and your determination with which you stood up for your beliefs in Court yesterday.
We’re fully conscious that you do speak for many, and by showing up in Court, you’ve added to that number, irrelevant of differences, all of us who, at this point in time, see you as someone, like us, is trying his best to find the same answers as we are: the truth. Your appearance in Court merits that we are to set aside differences, which later can be, or not, clarified, and concentrate on what we have in common. There is a difference between BH promoters of neglect, which we fiercely fight, and those who believe it with sincerity, which we obviously respect. We think the British Empire motto of Divide and Conquer should never be forgotten. It was highly successful in conquering empires. We don't want them to achieve unnecessary infighting
In the name of those with a clear consciences and a profound sense of citizenship, allow us to sincerely thank you! You're looking the foe straight in the eye, and on the battleground of his choice!
The Bronte-Cohen Sisters
You and we, apparently at least, have significant differences of opinion about the genesis of the Maddie Affair, but that shouldn't, in any way, be an obstacle in us recognizing your courage and your determination with which you stood up for your beliefs in Court yesterday.
We’re fully conscious that you do speak for many, and by showing up in Court, you’ve added to that number, irrelevant of differences, all of us who, at this point in time, see you as someone, like us, is trying his best to find the same answers as we are: the truth. Your appearance in Court merits that we are to set aside differences, which later can be, or not, clarified, and concentrate on what we have in common. There is a difference between BH promoters of neglect, which we fiercely fight, and those who believe it with sincerity, which we obviously respect. We think the British Empire motto of Divide and Conquer should never be forgotten. It was highly successful in conquering empires. We don't want them to achieve unnecessary infighting
In the name of those with a clear consciences and a profound sense of citizenship, allow us to sincerely thank you! You're looking the foe straight in the eye, and on the battleground of his choice!
The Bronte-Cohen Sisters
28 Responses to "To Tony Bennett"
What a great unifying message.
The tide is turning indeed.
I used to be very critical regarding the methods used by mr. TB to get his point of view known. Over the time , I changed my mind because I think, sometimes, being polemical, going some steps forward, raising protagonism, is the only way to combat the privileges some have and get the world more balanced. At moment, justice in Uk and Portugal, become a joke. Just look at the symbol used to represent justice and you will fall in laugh, Completely unbalanced.
I don't think, there is a big difference between Mr. TB point of view and this blog. At the beginning he was supporting his idea in the negligence ( why the Mccann's got away with it if they assumed the negligence and that is a crime for all the common citizens?) but I think, over the time, The new information and a deep comb of the files show that
the negligence has no reason to happen and Mr. TB has maybe changed his point of view regarding this issue.
There is no doubts, his work and persistence bring to Maddie case new information. Some characters were exposed and we start understand better the all saga. Thanks to him, Textusa, Joana Morais, Parmalan, Mccannfiles and some others who spent a lot of their time and work, informing the public and looking for some justice for a little girl they ever met. You made History on that case.
Please correct your hand. TB does not have the truth on his side. Nor does Textusa. He, like Textusa, seek to find the truth, but neither have stated that they own it. Only those who began this ridiculous circus know exactly what the truth is.
I confess that I'm more for Textusa's version, but as Textusa says, right now I'm 100% behind TB.
What both Textusa and TB have is the conviction of what they believe in.
Anon Feb 9, 2012 7:42:00 PM, thank you for expressing my thoughts. I would like to add 2 bloggers to your list: MC (Maria) and Mercedes.
Gazeta Digital from Paulo Reis the first blog about Maddie´s case and so important. Don´t forget Paulo Reis. ( yes, i am and i was and i will be always a big fan from Paulo !)
But i thank You anon but Maria ( me, myself i only copy and paste a lot. I am not genuine lol)
I want to not stop and i search all days by anything , by news even the censorship in my country . So what i can, i put OR i copy......
And i feel happy by this post to give more strong to T. B. Very happy ! Thank You, Sister of us!
Bravo, Sir!
Thank you, Sisters, for showing your support!
God bless all who fight for truth and justice!
"MacIntyre Investigates: Irish witness key to Maddie case review Sunday World (article appears in paper edition)"- available at Mccannfiles.
A huge whitewash is on the way, completely immoral. So immoral that SY intend to criticize PJ and GA. Since when one police has the right and the authority to criticize the police of another country in such manner? They lost the plot. They are out of the time. They were involved in the investigation since the beginning, then any critic must bee a bullet on SY own feet. If SY jump on that wagon will be doing more damages on their own territory then on PJ. They took too long to react, they can't be serious.
While reading this article, I couldn't forget the last post of Textusa regarding Muratfan. The article looks like a copy of what Muratfan posted long ago. The same ideas of an abductor being part of the Resort ( a worker) and entering the flat using a key. Again the burglars and the sets of the same keys stored in an accessible place and easy to be copied. What a theory, constructed by the group of lawyers and planned during almost 5 years, to be delivered in many ways: a pro blogger, Kates book and now an unnamed source from inside SY.
They forgot few "facts"( I don't know what else to call it): even with a key, the abductor was not nacked when he went the flat and if was the egg man of Jane Tanner, had a long hair. Where are the footprints, clothe fibers and hair belonging to the abductor? He had the keys and hired a fairy to clean up everything behind him. I really want to know what that " source from inside SY" has to say about that. Another answers I'm looking for is the explanations that "source" has for what was recovered from the CSI British dogs - the cadaver scent on Kate clothes and the body fluids+ hair ( matching Maddie in a high DNA level) found on the boot of the scenic rented by the couple, more then 20 days after the girl being missing. Don't tell me, the burglar or the worker, who had an easy access to the keys, also controlled the car the Mccann's were going to choose for their holidays. I know, that story is full in clairvoyants and supra natural figures but having SY working on such theory with millions of pounds stollen from the British taxpayers, is the best joke I read on British papers today. Let that story spread to the new "NEWS OF THE WORLD" and I think we should start emailing SY team with our questions, asking them to deliver the answers using the same way and the same papers. Why that smells so much Mccann's and Clarence Mitchell? I start believing, somebody on the papers( journalists or editors) are being payed by the Fund.
At least we see now, the Smiths and the amazing story we suspected since long ago that Madeleine was transferred into another flat on that particular night.
They are framing the Smiths before they could head to Portugal to testify in GA case.
which appears appropriate to TB's situation.
"Let Right be Done"
I am glad of your comments. As you say, you have your differences, but you are honourable to stand above those differences and acknowledge that both in different ways are seeking the same thing.
TB is courageous in his way, he is standing up and being counted - even if he fails it will be a victory. Go to it TB.
This is a sea-change.
THE sea change.
To all concerned: Are you prepared to go picknicking upon each other?
For one of you will have to defend yourself by stating, thru messrs Carter-Ruck: it was him/her wot made me do it.
Portia
Yes, the sea is changing, and has been changing for a while
Like she said on her post “Textusa Is Giving Up On The Maddie Affair”, in 3Jan12:
“Is it possible that a stage is now being set up to, in February, using the Amaral Trial in Lisbon, to get the case “re-opened”? By the way, we do think it is... And, surprise, surprise, "discover" that the parents & friends are indeed guilty of negligence and manslaughter?
The charges may even describe truthfully what happened precisely at the time of death, namely, we might even get to know who, if David Payne or Kate McCann, was the one that struck the irate, but unfortunately fatal, blow.
They will also tell us how Tanner and the others lied out of pure friendship, and that there was no abductor to begin with.
But that is as far the system will allow the truth to go. Not an inch further.”
As the GA Trial got postponed, it’s TB’s Trial that might be the igniter. The McCanns had reason reason to fear any Court that ever mentions facts (even if clutter, fed by BHs). Now, because I heard that CR put on a very poor show in Court as many have here said before they would, the T9 have much more to fear. They have to look front to face the Judge, and now look back to see any knife coming!”
They expected a tearful TB out of Court, but were so disappointed...
The coloboma was a great “marketing ploy” for the McCs.
Libel has been Carter-Ruck’s greatest “marketing ploy”
On Wednesday they apparently showed that… herm… you know… in Court they weren’t that hot after all… they’re much better in distributing mail.
If I were the McCs, I would ask for a refund right now, before the stock market picks up this issue…
http://www.cmjornal.xl.pt/detalhe/noticias/nacional/portugal/alemao-estudou-local-das-mortes-de-amante-e-bebe
The german man who killed the woman he lived with and their baby in Lagos is to face trial. Little doubts about his guilt.
In MHO,I think all of us must support Mr. Tony Bennet who has been working as Sr. Gonzalo Amaral did. They are both brave men!
Besides, I must also congratulate
on Textusa, as Luisa y Mercedes as well, for all their work done during all these years.
Finally, I expect Madeleine's truth
to be discovered once and for all. This is the most important thing!!!
The time has come for the Mccanns to face justice.
The McCanns must be shitting themselves.
"Donal MacIntyre travels to Praia da Luz, Portugal, to review the evidence in one of the most baffling abduction cases ever"
By Donal MacIntrye
Sunday February 5, 2012
E impossivel que um artigo destes, tao descaramente pro, nao seja encomendado por alguem a quem o artigo melhor serve os interesses. Ha por certo, dinheiro a rolar nas maos de quem escreve e de quem publica estas coisas.
O journalism nao e isto. Nao e isto que se ensina nas universidades onde se promote a isencao jornalistica, a etica, a fidelidade a verdade.
Isto nao e uma cronica de opiniao sobre uma historia de ficcao. E a manipulacao de uma realidade que envolve o desaparecimento muito mal contado de uma crianca indefesa e real.
Quando sera que alguem com autoridade vai olhar para Estes artigos, questiona-los e investigation-los? Afinal porque acontecem? E sobretudo, porque acontecem em momentos tao especiais.
E impossivel que nao haja dinheiro em "cash" a iluminar o teclado destes "mccornalistas". Ate a imbecilidade tem limites. E quem escreve ou publica isto, ou e um imbecil ou pretende passar um atestado de imbecilidade ao publico.
E tambem assim, que esta a ser usado o dinheiro do Fundo. E a isto eles chamam "the search of our beloved daughter".
Jornalistas como este, tem de ser arrolados como testemunhas no tribunal. A pequena Maddie merece saber( onde quer que esteja) porque andam Estes figurantes a atentar contra ela. Que mal ensombra esta crianca?
Please be careful with the language used. We would all understand if you had written "sh*tt*ng". Hypocritical? Yes, but it's the rules of the game which we've accepted and in no manner hinder our objectives. Thank you for your understanding.
Blacksmith challenges: "Anyway, just for once the Bureau has a nice hopeful message. There is no reason to suggest that the review will be anything other than straight as a die. We hope that those who disagree with us will give us the evidence for supposing otherwise."
I'll give him a piece of evidence: time.
Almost 9 months to come to a conclusion on a straight forward case. That is evidence enough that they're working on the conclusion, and not trying to find one.
He says that SY have never whitewashed anybody before. I don't know if that is true, but I do know that people say "there's a first time for everything" for a reason.
BS writes only what others have said before. I cannot accuse of plagarism because he does write in his own wording, but ethically, he's nothing but a copier of other people's ideas.
I just understand the fascination for this individual.
Post a Comment