Saturday 6 November 2021

Chapter 26 – The Ocasional Discovery




1. Our synopsis

Textusa25 Oct 2021, 15:56:00

Continuing with our synopsis of the book:

Chapter 26 – The Ocasional Discovery

In Neuwegersleben, on January 14 2016, CB’s neighbour calls the local police because of a nauseating smell that came from a certain place of the plot where CB resided in an autocaravan. The stink was so intense that unlike the earth it did not freeze.

30 cm (1 ft) deep the police found the dead body of a Labrador and underneath it a LIDL supermarket bag containing «firewood».

It was found and apprehended in the LIDL bag 6 pen-drives and 2 memory cards which contained “photos of children, including those of an unknown child in sensual poses and, mainly, Word documents which the police responsible for the find describe as writings about serious sexual abuse against children. Later, BKA identifies these and other writings as two documents produced by the suspect with the titles of «Das Buch» [Google translate: «The Book»] and «Das Buch 1». These «books» said to be autobiographic speak of himself and of friends and describe criminal practices. It’s unknown if we are before realities or pure fantasies, but the fact is that the finding of all this material was and is useful for the construction of a suspect.”

For the sexual abuse by production of photos against an unidentified child the suspect is condemned to 1 year and 3 months in prison.

On June 8 2016, an arrest warrant for the possession of child porn was issued. Two months later [August 2016], not knowing the whereabouts of the sentenced man, a European arrest warrant was issued.

In June 2017, CB was arrested in São Bartolomeu de Messines, in the Algarve when the GNR was called because he was either urinating or exhibiting himself in front of children in a local festivity.

On June 26 2017 CB is extradited to Germany to serve his sentence.

Only in July 2018, is the child in the photos identified. She was 4 yr old at the time and is the daughter of a female friend of CB. They met in Germany at the beginning of 2013. The child’s mother even declares that she doesn’t believe CB had abused her daughter but the police “made the point of stressing that he had been condemned for child sex abuse, in question the production of photos.”


2. Our analysis

Textusa25 Oct 2021, 16:20:00

We would just to like to point out that we find it strange how in winter, in Germany, outdoors, there can be a smell, even of o rotting dead dog buried a foot deep that would alert a neighbour. Freezing slows down the decomposition process and, as far as we know, rotting tissue freezes like any other.

Then, we saw in Chapter 15 that Brueckner seems to be fully aware of the need to destroy damning evidence of heinous acts/crimes, goes and buries under a dead dog, just a foot deep, 8 electronic memory devices. Out of which, it is described this far, 2 Word docs and photos of a child are found. 
 
Basically, it seems at least, the vast majority of the devices didn’t contain damning information, so why hide them beneath a dead dog?

Then, what would be the purpose of hiding the pens and cards beneath the dog, outdoors in the middle of winter?

If to retrieve them later, then we think that burying them in the ground, a wet and frozen ground, is not the best place even if in a plastic bag which, being a supermarket bag was not a sealed container.
 
Humidity does tend to damage irreversibly such devices – and here it is pertinent to raise the question, how was the police able to retrieve any information from them? Humidity from natural causes, one has to add to the humidity from the fluids from the decomposition of the dog.

If the purpose was to retrieve, then it seems very logic that one would use a small container, a box or a jar, bury it in the yard and it would be close to impossible to ever be found.

If the intent was to destroy, it seems to us that the best way to go about it would be to use a hammer and then dispose of it via common garbage.

The circumstances in which this evidence was found, is to us very suspicious.


3. The 2016 searched property

By googling “brueckner searches 2016 neuwegersleben” one gets the following images of the searched property:



We will leave it up to readers to decide on whether if it's likely for in the middle of winter in Germany, the body of a dog buried a foot deep to have affected in any way the nose of a neighbour...



4. The 2014 searched property

In our comment at 25 Oct 2021, 16:24:00, we said:

- July 2 2014 – photos of the 4yr old found in a house search, in Brueckner’s residence in Neuwegersleben, Germany. (Chapter 25)

- January 14 2016 – the police find in Neuwegersleben under the body of a dog, 6 pen-drives and 2 memory cards, containing photos of a 4yr old and 2 Word docs, Book and Book 1. (Chapter 26)


Reacting to this clear discrepancy, we wrote:

Textusa 25 Oct 2021, 16:27:00

As can be seen there are 2 contradicting dates regarding the house search in Germany, July 2 2014 and January 14 2016.

As Chapter 26 details the circumstances of the search in this property and that the arrest warrants were issued in 2016, we will assume as real the 2016 date and will in later comments disregard the 2014 one.


To this, we received the following comment:

Anonymous 25 Oct 2021, 18:19:00

The 2014 search was carried out at a Braunschweig apartment, where he was living at the time. CSA had been seen on his computer by the girfriend.




(images from this CBS article)


One could even say that what was allegedly found under the body of a dog in 2016 had already been found in 2014...

That would certainly provide a cover for him having only been sentenced in 2017 for it, wouldn't it?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Textusa