The images we have of May 4 2007 have now provided us with so much new information which is not only important but also essential and vital to out the truth that we believe that it can keep the blog going for a long time.
In fact, it presents us with a huge problem and that is how we feel it best to present it to our readers.
It’s full of surprises and is very compromising to all those who have been engaged for all these years in blocking the truth from our eyes.
That’s why the Maddie case internet has deflated completely. Now we can only see half a dozen foot-soldiers who are either so shameless or so desperate – most likely both – that they continue regardless how of ridiculous they know they are being.
Of that pathetic remaining activity the main tactic has been to divert the attention so all will only look at the T9 and, in some cases, not even at the T9, just at the McCanns.
For example, when we published the “4th very important picture” we pointed a finger at 2 of the T9, Russell O’Brien and Matthew Oldfield and how did the internet react? Silence or coming to the defense of these 2 T9s.
We would think that showing some of the T9 were not telling the truth about what they were doing on the afternoon of May 3 should be used by all looking for the truth about Maddie, independent of the theory each one defends, but it seems we are clearly in the minority in this.
One such person who rushed to defend Russell and Matt was Jules with this tweet:
Why would a self-claimed anti go out of her way to mislead and defend some of the T9? Aren’t all the T9 supposedly in on it?
Why attempt to discredit the importance of the beach photo tweeted by the Frog, above, which we have called the 4th Very Important photo?
But then all is to be expected from Jules, the 3-photographer talker, top-secret BRT knower and absolutely fluent in Portuguese who, together with Mr Thompson, has elevated the debate about the death of Maddie McCann into this:
We replied to Jules’ boat tweet with this comment, in our post:
“Textusa 4 Jan 2019, 12:49:00
And Jules has replied to this post with this tweet:
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌🌸🐌🌸🐌🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @TheBunnyReturns @barragirl49 and
Is that boats I see on the 4th May.. ? #McCann
11:48 PM - 3 Jan 2019
Firstly, because it’s much more important than Russ and Matt’s water antics, as we have said REPEATEDLY, do note that how when Jules has SOMETHING she quickly rushes and publishes it.
She has a profusio alvi publicatória syndrome for anything that may in her imagination contradict us… with one exception: the BRT. That secret she obtained after speaking with no less than 3 photographers that will PROVE without doubt and beyond question that the BRT did exist. THAT, she won’t publish. Why?
But to answer to what she has posted, no they are not boats, they are paddle-boats, also called pedal boats because they have pedals like bikes. In Portugal they are called gaivotas.
The fact they are on the beach does not mean they are in use for the public. No safety cordon in place so recreational embarkations brought in for the upcoming summer activities. Certainly, more recreational embarkations, including boats, were brought in later because if what is pictured is all that Luz’s Beach Hut Watersports would have to offer tourists for the entire Summer, then we doubt it would be a profitable business.
In terms of there not being a safety-corridor in place, we simply ask what if the Matt & Russ sailing trip had happened indeed, which evidently it didn’t, and Russ had drowned?
Can readers imagine what kind of civil and criminal responsibility that whoever hired them the alleged boat would incur? Sheer madness to risk losing their concession face years of legal battles and expenses just because of a couple of tourists. Note, in case there were boats there, and there weren’t any.
Jules’ screengrab comes from this video:
We strongly recommend that readers watch it.
The sea looks too rough for paddle boats, even if the safety cordon was in place. And certainly not for toddlers on dinghies.
But what we can finally see is the hundreds, no, dare we say thousands of people scouring the landscape searching for Maddie! Hundreds or thousands of invisible people, that is.
It shows families on beach with children playing. A couple walking along, not searching, men fishing… all unaware of a missing girl. If it wasn’t for the media, would Praia da Luz have realised a girl had disappeared the night before?
Thank you Jules for a very useful video. Stupidity is indeed limitless.”
But it’s not only the May 4 images that are useful. Others are too. For example, some images from May 13 prove without any doubt what we have said in the current post: there was no watersports on May 3 by Russ and Matt as alleged by them.
There are 2 videos of Gerry and Kate walking on the beach:
The first piece of information that they give us is to show that the beach, the only attraction Praia da Luz has, continues to have an insignificant number of people even though 10 days have passed after Maddie disappeared:
That is not surprising as it’s mid-May. But it confirms the hoax of those telling us that Praia da Luz had hundreds of tourists there just for the beach, the only thing Luz has to offer just 10 days before.
On May 13, if anything, there should be more people than usual as Praia da Luz was literally on the news all over the world.
Those who had planned being in Luz on May 13, wouldn’t have cancelled..
No one would have cancelled their vacation, in fact they would be eager to visit the place the world was focusing on.
But the beach is practically deserted, taking into account the number of tourists said to be in Luz in the week Maddie disappeared. Note, we are not saying that there weren’t hundreds of tourists in Praia da Luz, we are simply saying that it is a hoax saying that they were there to enjoy the beach. The May 4 images show clearly that was not the case, as was not still the case 10 days later, on May 13.
If people cancelled their holidays that fortnight it was not because they changed their opinion about going to the beach, their change of heart lay somewhere else.
And to the hoax of the hundreds of beach-going tourists before Maddie disappeared, one has to add the hoax of the hundreds of tourists said to be searching for Maddie after she disappeared.
As we said, we do believe that there were hundreds of tourists in Praia da Luz. We have even determined that the booking sheets say there was an average of 350 daily at the Ocean Club alone, as we showed in our post “Missing people”:
However, Robin Crosland disagrees with us and says there were 600 guests there:
As we have shown that the booking sheets have been doctored, we have no reason not to believe in Mr Crosland.
The guests weren’t at the beach... they weren’t at the Tapas pool... and they weren’t searching for Maddie... so where were these 600 guests on May 4?
But the importance of these videos, more specifically the second one, is that they prove what we have been saying for years: there had been no watersports on May 3.
It starts by showing that on May 13, the recreational embarkations shown by Jules on her tweets are in the exact same location and same disposition as they were on May 4. Meaning they weren’t being used. Most likely spent all winter there:
But it’s when the McCanns pass by the Sky News camera that the image becomes relevant: the sailing boats appear:
These boats were not there on May 4:
So not there on May 3. Meaning there were no watersports on May 3 like we said there wasn’t.
Maybe they were pruned out of the beach as some say happened with the bougainvilleas in Tapas. On May 3, they are supposedly in full flower but on May 4 the flowers are gone…
If the flowering happened after May 4, as it seems to be the case, then this proves that part of the Last Photo was taken after that day, as we have defended to have been the case.
By the way, above is what a media storm looks like, not what the images of May 4 show was happening outside Block 5. Please note that this is Sky News filming, so we don’t know if there is any other media behind, we can only see what the cameraman filmed, so there may have been many more reporters on that beach that day.
This post is clearly against the T9 as it proves Russell and Matt were not truthful about their whereabouts on the afternoon of May 3.
One would think that if any of the T9 was caught fibbing it would be worthy of discussion on the internet but we all know that will not be the case.
We sit back and watch the puppet show the Lick-Spittle Gang are putting on the internet.
The puppet show will continue to try to show that what only matters is to discover how the McCanns lied, how neglectful they confessed to be (this one may go back and forth depending on whether the tide is going in or out) and how they sedated the kids (even though the only clues to that effect is Kate checking the twins breathing and their unusually heavy sleep after Maddie disappeared and both are perfectly possible to have happened after Maddie disappeared).
It’s like the case on the internet is stuck in a subject-loop. Fortunately, the number of puppeteers has dwindled to an insignificant few, and less and less arms means less and less puppets.
And it is indeed a puppet show because the characters are basically the same people with their hands up both the good and the villain puppets, and all they need to do is to change the voice accordingly to what that character is expected to say in the subject-contained script the puppeteers follow to a tee.
Unfortunately for them, only the very, very young and gullible children believe that puppets aren’t… The fact that the majority of the reasonable spectators are silent – having been bullied into that for years – doesn’t mean they cannot fully understand what they are watching.
A clue? The applause from the pretendy audience has become so cringeworthy that even they hesitate to clap themselves, so self-conscious they have become.
NT's blog is a eerie as an abandoned mine shaft. He says he started a new blog and is it even deader than the original:
And his fan-base does not seem to have adhered:
It’s with pleasure that we see this account finally deciding to come out of the closet, assume that it does read our blog and publicly assume, trying to compete with Hall’s graphics, to be against us:
Now, we’ll just observe and see if those who profess disgust for this individual will side with him.
By the way, the above is the best explanation we’ve seen - even if idiotic - to explain where were all the guests said to be in Praia da Luz (and we believe that there were indeed hundreds of guests there) because they certainly are nowhere to be seen in the images we have seen of May 4.