Covering-up the Cover-up

There are two-words that are joined at the hip with the Maddie case: negligence and cover-up.

One, as we know, has been made up and is part of the second. However the second, cover-up, is not exactly true.  At least in the way that you are reading it.

That there’s a cover-up, is an unquestionable fact.


That a cover-up has the objective of hiding the knowledge of facts that have occurred is also not debatable.

But you may have the wrong perception of what IMPORTANT facts are being covered up.

The swinging? No, that was covered-up indeed and you would think that would be the important fact that cannot surface publicly and so the motive of a cover-up of massive proportions which we have witnessed.

The problem on UK’s hands is not the covering-up of the swinging event in 2007. The problem UK has is the cover-up of that covering-up.

The covering-up of a cover-up. That is the biggest problem UK has on its hands.

Let’s look at this in parts.

First, a girl died. Very inconveniently for the swingers. Irrelevant of circumstances of said death the swingers didn’t want any sort of attention drawn to the resort.

If the death could be related to sex, then it would no longer be a question of not wanting but one of not allowing it.

We believe the death was indeed related to sex. Not in any way of paedo nature but in the sequence of an interrupted sexual act between two consenting adults: Kate McCann and David Payne.

Evidence would show that Payne’s presence in that apartment was a very, very friendly one. Way too friendly for comfort to the swingers.

Time has proven that there were many other options to cover-up this death but the fantasist abduction option was the chosen one.

This initial cover-up mobilised a significant amount of means almost immediately. The presence of UK’s Ambassador to Portugal in PdL, in our opinion, to have a very short leash on what was being investigated was a sign of this.

What was the cover-up of swinging, quickly became the covering-up of the T9, the McCanns and friends.

But there was a subtle but important difference. While the swinging cover-up never lost its purpose, the intention of the T9 cover-up was ambiguous.

After all, the swingers knew that the T9 were responsible for Maddie’s death, independently in which circumstances it happened.

So, anything in the T9 cover-up that didn’t jeopardise the swinging one, was allowed to be given life.

In September 2007 everything changed. The fact that the McCanns couldn’t be prosecuted and Maddie’s death circumscribed to the T9 alone, meant that UK made a decision that would forever change history in the country.

The decision was to make the swinging cover-up and the T9 cover-up the one and the same.

From then on, UK, the whole of UK, put its shoulder to the task of assuring that the abduction lie be the truth. No matter how naked the emperor was, he was to be “dressed” in the most lavish clothes.

A whole nation started to play a game. A very sick one, played upon the board that was the death of a little British girl.

So UK, with ALL its political, judicial (legal and law-enforcement) and media sectors came together to embark on a collective lie with no historic precedence. All other sectors of British society turned a blind eye to what they were witnessing and so became accomplices by omission.

This cover-up of humungous proportions worked fine for UK.

Besides the fact that the McCanns damaged significantly UK’s image outside its borders, which we will speak about later in the post, the cover-up reached its objective: everyone condemned the McCanns for negligence and the rest of PdL (guests, Ocean Club and ex-Pats) remained with the most beatific of status. Not a word about swinging.

With the exception of a rogue blog, but that is something history will judge.

It worked fine also because the incompetence for the lack of results lay with the Portuguese, and they seemed to accept that quite well.

The sleeping dog was indeed lying but not peacefully, as this massive national cover-up had two direct effects.

The first, and most relevant, was that Maddie became historic. Whatever is to be exposed about it, it will always remain in history books.

It’s a subject that UK will not be able to shake off. Whether 2014 will be a proud moment for the UK on the case or not is only up to UK to decide.

The second is that Gerry and Kate McCann have become “Badwill Ambassadors” of UK. They represent the worst of UK. The worst that nepotism can invoke. Guilty in the international public eye but protected by the British Establishment.

John Bull became a bully when it came to the McCanns.

Maddie was (and is) an out-of-bounds topic in any international meeting involving Britain.

Gerry and Kate McCann have set back years and years of diplomatic work for the UK. They shame UK and UK is very aware of that.

So the lying dog could not have been left lying. Something had to be done about it.

David Cameron woke up this dog on May 2011. Disastrously so as time has proven.

What was supposed to be a ride in the park very quickly became a nightmare. We have explained why extensively in many posts in the blog.

What matters is that right now (please read right now as from the Spring of 2013 until the present) is the UK has found itself in the following predicament: if there isn’t a plausible thesis to support charging the McCanns alone (with or without the other T7) then a cover-up has to be exposed.

And that’s where the cover-up of the cover-up makes its debut.

What cover-up to expose? How much of the real cover-up?

How will the British public react when told that ALL the possible means of their nation were put to use to cover-up just a swinging event?

How could the nation be engulfed to simply protect one group of people, none of whom is really powerful? How to explain how things snowballed beyond control because of that?!?

Was it only because of a group of people avoiding being socially humiliated that the UK had humiliated Portugal? That had humiliated itself?

How could a nation be the subject of international very relevant criticism just to protect from social criticism a mere group of its nationals?

Understand now why UK’s problem is the covering-up of the cover-up?

What do you think SY has been, as we think it was, tasked to do soon after it discovered that the McCanns couldn’t be brought to the “gallows” alone?

We think it was to find a scenario to avoid any revelation of the real cover-up that happened.

As we can see, it wasn’t an easy task. We would go as far as saying it is an impossible one.

They are struggling but unable.

This latest meeting in the Algarve between SY and PJ is nothing more than an attempt to get both countries singing from the same hymn sheet when SY breaks with what it intends to break.

To decide on how much, or if any, of the cover-up will be uncovered. Assuring the rest of the cover-up remains covered.

The fact that the 3 Burglars have now become 3 Ocean Club workers lets us be slightly more optimistic as to the extent of what will be exposed.

What to cover and what to uncover that is the question.

The answer?

It’s up to UK.