by May I
When I became part of your blog there were things I disagreed with you about, and others you stated that, if asked, I wouldn’t have subscribed.
One of them was your swingers scenario. Not because it wasn’t credible or that it was outrageous, I just like to keep all options in the open.
I joined your blog because you, like me, seemed to have understood that we’re fighting those that should be fighting for us, so decided to set our differences aside and help you.
I’m becoming more convinced that your swingers scenario is the most likely one. Pharmaceutical companies may have given an unethical freebie holiday to the doctors, Underhand property deals involving the Anglo Irish Bank may have been taking place; time will tell on this one, as we await the outcome of various prosecutions.
The same can be said for the Assistant Chief Constable of Leicester, now suspended for alleged fraudulent overseas property deals …… and the Metropolitan Police, for using undercover police to spy on protest groups for 7 years; not to protect the public, but to provide information to private companies whose commercial interests may have been threatened?
Oh yes, our British police are wonderful sandwich munchers!
Given the people and their backgrounds identified so far, I also think it highly unlikely that so many paedophiles would gather in one place.
Statistically, some amongst them may well have been paedophiles; not necessarily known outside their circle, but to allege that a planned paedophilic operation was responsible for Maddie’s disappearance is not reasonable.
The majority of the men were possibly Freemasons. Easily found, even amongst my own acquaintances, although I dislike all forms of nepotism.
Most at the level I know say it’s the only way to get on in business and they do lots of charitable work.
But, none of these factors seems to explain the number and varied occupations of the people involved in covering up for the McCanns, outside their circle of 7 friends. What unites them? I looked on the internet at the “KW” place you talked about, entering only the “K” word I found a luxurious hotel, where I might have chosen to spend a relaxing weekend with my husband- if we could afford it. It looked very exclusive.
Then I added the “W” and what a shock I would have got if I’d just booked from my first internet enquiry.
Would I have been concerned about all the strange coming and goings? Would I have been propositioned by strangers in a corridor? I realised that I could have unwittingly stumbled into a famous swingers’ scenario. Would any one have checked our intentions before we arrived?
Children not welcome should have told me something. It is happening under the noses of the uninitiated like me!
Swingers to me initially meant a few suburban couples chucking their keys onto a coffee table at a friend’s house, or “dogging” in the local car park. (Golf is beginning to sound more appealing!) KW made me realise how high class people were participating on a large scale and a look at sites in Portugal- only from the outside; as I didn’t go into them, (Miss Goody 2 Shoes) showed that even a Catholic country with strict family values hosted such events on a wide scale.
Then I thought, no wonder the McCanns and friends had to justify incarcerating their children in the crèche for such long periods; having gone to the trouble of taking them on holiday, rather than leaving them at home to be indulged by Grandma.
They had to be seen to be doing lots of wholesome activities which children couldn’t really participate in. Lots of youngish adults with NO children on holiday would have looked very strange to any holiday maker who had booked themselves into PdL in all ignorance of what the place was about.
No wonder the OC didn’t want publicity about swingers- National outrage and plummeting profits in a climate where the property market shortly going into free-fall.
No wonder either, that Control Risk groups were already on the scene, primed to head off any scandal that the entourage might unwittingly initiate and protect them from outside intrusion.
No surprise that the leaders of Portugal and Great Britain, poised to sign the Lisbon Treaty, felt that this would be a disaster; captains of industry, property, banking and medicine, and perhaps the odd politician we are not yet aware of.
Gerry apparently called in some favours; according to brother John of Astra Zeneca. More like “help us or else!”
How the circles of lies multiplied and how those now caught up in the circles must hate the McCanns. The in-fighting and blame must be going on as we speak, because the solid protections are now weakening-changes of governments, bank scandals and euro bail- outs in Ireland and Portugal, comments against the McCanns beginning to re-appear in the media,
GA’s book unbanned, blogs continuing with business as usual, the joke libel laws in the UK facing real changes, the Met Police facing criticism on different fronts, Gamble gone from CEOP, FSS disbanded, Kennedy’s fortunes waning, Wikileaks and maybe more to come? ……
The abduction scenario, a paedophile lurking within 10 miles of PdL, still out there after all these months. couldn’t have been good for business, but a swingers’ resort would have been the kiss of death.
Efforts to spread the scare beyond Portugal seem to have ground to a halt, because we can link many “sightees” as having vested interests and links in PdL?
The McCanns are circling the town again because that’s where the answer lies. It’s clear from the files that the Portuguese were nearly there in their investigation.
Who killed it off- that’s the question?