At this point in time, I propose that we stop and reflect for a minute.
Evidence shows clearly that Mrs Fenn was not truthful in her statement to the PJ.
What that means is much more relevant than the why she does it.
Later, I’ll give my opinion on that, although an Anon basically has summed it up quite adequately: “The time that she gave it is really interesting for me- It is when in UK, the DNA was under test, PJ was in standby waiting for the results and the British tabloids very busy trying to bring some entropy to the public to dismiss the work of the police and blame PJ.”
By the way, addressing, just for a moment, those that promote the idea that I dislike or mistreat those who disagree with me, as I write these words, I basically disagree with this Anon’s opinion on Carol Tranmer-Fenn.
While Anon thinks she’s as much a phony as her aunt, I think otherwise. But this Anon has presented pretty good arguments to back up his/her opinions, so, valid contributions that they are, they will be savored carefully as any good food for thought is to be.
And if I had as goal proving that (s)he’s wrong, I would be making the same mistake many accuse me of, and, unfortunately, some do make it.
The idea is to assimilate the information given, which I hereby thank, overlap it with my perception of the facts portrayed and reach a personal conclusion, to the best of my capacity, as to what is valid information and what isn’t.
The result might be that what I thought was, may not have been, or was not at all; or what I thought may have been, now is. It’s personal and it’s subjective. So, if in a near future I insist on Carol’s honesty that is not to be taken neither as sign of stubbornness, nor that of weakness if I question what she has said.
At the right time in life I enjoyed, plentifully I may add, my childhood days. I threw the tantrums I should have and my life’s purpose was to make my parent’s one as miserable as possible just because.
Those times are gone. Even the times when I suffered the reverse of the "teen-coin" have gone too. I now help those, my grandchildren, whose turn it is to make life terrible for others, their parents.
Here however, time is for maturity and realization of the seriousness of the issue handled and the responsibility assumed. Egos must be set aside.
I’ve been, I think so at least otherwise there would be no point in my writing, right up to now, not because I’m smarter than you, but because I 've done things very slowly and carefully, and because I don't jump to conclusions and am not afraid to listen.
Oh, also for having have called the Black Hats threatening bluffs from the first minute.
I’m fully aware that I'm not the owner of the truth. I said it before, that it's not, nor I assume it is, to hand out Justice. But I'm entitled to an opinion and have the right to express it.
Sometimes, I feel that the some pieces simply don’t fit the puzzle. When that happens, either I just put them aside, or I clearly warn that I’m speculating.
Learned with my mistake when, initially, in my theory, I wrongly stated, although I felt something wasn't right when I said it (as later I thoroughly explained) that the Smith Sighting was Gerry McCann disposing of Maddie’s body.
By the way, that theory is full of mistakes, but, before you trash it, its backbone remains as valid today as it did on the day I wrote it.
And talking about Mr. Smith, there was still a piece or two that remained lying around. These, whenever I “forced” them into the puzzle, made others fell out. As all the others fitted with perfection, the mistake could only be in the way I was forcing them in.
So I just put them a aside, and waited until they made sense. Help from surprising sources, have now clarified those issues, and I will, one of these days, and when opportune, place these pieces in their rightful place, to the sadness of some but happiness of most, I hope.
But today, as I said, is time for reflection. On what means Mrs Fenn having lied.
Disregard for a moment both her motives and her pretended message. Concentrate simply what really is implied if she’s, in fact, lying.
Imagine that you hold a magic pencil, with which you’re able to draw Circles of Lies.
To draw any of these Circles, you have to understand the reasons why all those that you put inside it have to lie.
Only then can you group people, because, basically that’s what you’re doing.
It’s then easy to draw the Circle of Lie around Kate and Gerry. We all know that it’s pretty hard to find a word of truth uttered by a McCann mouth, as they lie so blatantly and candidly.
It’s also easy to draw the Circle of Lie around the Tapas, as their inconsistencies will baffle mathematicians for a long time to come.
But with Mrs Fenn, this task suddenly stops being easy.
With Mrs Fenn we have someone that is outside the inner Circles of the McCanns & Tapas, and outside the slightly larger Circle of “casual” tourists, like Wilkins.
We’re before a PdL resident, owner of an apartment, and apparently with no reason whatsoever to lie.
With this Mrs Fenn phenomenon, you’re faced with a big problem, and that is, if she’s lying, where on earth does the lying stop?
You simply just don’t know how large a Circle you have to draw to include this particular lady.
Do you remember when I said that the PJ Files were simply filled with FACTS of said facts? The incomprehensibility of Fenn’s lying depicts not a situation of implausibility but one where all the borders of credibility simply have vanished from where they were.
But the borders are there, just not where you thought they were.
Mrs Fenn’s statement proves that one has to be very careful before assuming where the truth lies, and be very “forgiving” on where one where one decides to draw the line in any PdL’s Circle of Lie.
And no one is to be exempted, isn’t that so Mr. Smith?
Do have a nice weekend.