The 4 a.m. Outing

An Anonymous placed the following comment on the Beach Body Disposal Debunking post:

“Early morning May 4th, 4am, Payne and Mccann, after everyone had stopped searching left the apartment. McCann and Kate left the apartment same morning at 6 am....We know it was not to search as they have already admitted they did not search. So where did they go and what did they do?”

However I did say the following in the post:

“(...) and tell you what in my opinion PROVES, without a shadow of a doubt there was no body disposal at the beach: Gerry was alone. (…) And that proves what, ask you? It proves that ONLY HE knew where he buried or hid the body. And unless he drew up a treasure map, there was no way that anybody else, but he, could go and get the body. And, as far as I know, from the moment the GNR arrived; if there was an individual everybody knew where he was that night, that individual was Gerry McCann. And was never seen with sand on him that night.”

Apparently all I said above is contradicted by the comment.

But, first of all, one must question the fact that if Gerry and David went to the beach at 4 a.m. contradicts all said in the post? I say, no, it doesn’t.

In fact I say that the comment does not contradict ANYTHING on the post.

I’ll explain that in a bit, but let me clarify first the following. I took and take this comment having come from a White Hat, thus to be frank, genuine and constructive.

I even thought I was going to get “slammered” by you on this contradiction. I wasn’t. You people didn’t seem to exploit this apparently evident contradiction. So, I confess that I didn’t understand your silence, but I have a hunch that you’ve refrained yourself to being critical of me, even thinking that I had gone head over heels.

Well, if you thought that pointing out to me some inaccuracy of mine you would run the risk of helping the Black Hats, youre doing the exact opposite of the intended. I please ask you to point out ANYTHING that doesn't sound or seem right.

ALL facts must make sense, not only most.

And if something I say doesn’t make sense, I must either correct it or explain it better. I’m not owner of the truth, and I’m basing my theories solely on the information available and my interpretation of it.

The truth is unique, my goal is to achieve it.

So correcting a statement is never a step back, but always a huge one forward.

Truth cannot be contradicted.

As you’ve noticed, I set the same example in responding to your comments. If you think that something might of happened in a certain way, and I don’t agree with it, then l’ll fight you every inch of the way, and expect a similar reaction from you.

I hope, that you, like me, prioritise the clarification of truth over the imposition of an opinion or conviction.

Only through confrontation and discussion will light shine on the issue.

Yes, we may argue with each other, but believe me, the Black Hats dread a passionate exchange of ideas between us much more than you do.

So, if you don’t agree with something, please help us and say it. We here DO NOT bend fact to theory, but will immediately “update” theory to fact. Let that be very, very, clear.

To those familiar with the various Black Hat “maggot lairs”, you’ve noticed that my whole Smith Sighting Saga has been completely ignored by them. As if inexistent.

That pleases me. Other post have merited their attention, these seem not to.

They’re afraid of what is being said here. By me and by you. And I’ve seen some maggots roaming about.

Obviously stupid, meaningless and attention deviating comments are not accepted. But, so as not be accused of censorship, I’ve decided to create the Textusa Trash Can, where I deposit ALL these comments, so that you can judge for yourself.

Going back to the contradiction, let me say upfront that I stand by each word on the "Beach Body Disposal Debunking" post.

Not out of stubbornness, but of reason.

That post has suffered two major attacks. The one stated above and the “Sewer video”. This last one, being, so, so enlightening, I will leave for a different post.

The commentator of the 4 a.m apparent contradiction didn’t even question the validity of the post.

She/he just wanted to call the attention to the possible role of David Payne in this. I’m the one questioning it. My conscience demands it.

About the 4 a.m apparent contradiction, all I was able to gather were the following two sources: that:

The Sun,

"At midnight the Policia Judiciaria, the PJ, who investigate serious crimes, were called in, arriving at 1am. They, along with the McCanns, their friends, other holidaymakers and locals, scoured the area for two and a half hours.
At 3am Kate rang friends Jon and Michelle Corner, Sean and Amelie's godparents, at their Merseyside home.
Jon said: "She just blurted out that Maddie had been abducted. She said, 'They've taken my little girl'."
Child abductions are so rare in Portugal that there was a general feeling among the authorities that Madeleine would turn up asleep under a bush.
Apathy and incredulity set the tone for the police investigation. The PJ gave up the search for the night at around 3.30am. Gerry went back out again at about 4am with his friend David Payne.
At 6am Gerry and Kate held hands as they walked around scrubland on the outskirts of the village calling Madeleine's name.
The British embassy issued a statement declaring Madeleine missing. But there was no physical evidence she had been kidnapped. Gerry and Kate alone were convinced of that."

And David Payne’s statement for rogatory interview.

"QUOTE: 00:17:28 Reply "Err so then you know the Police were with err you know Kate and Gerry, you know chatting to them and you know looking at the apartment, etcetera, and they, you know I felt that they had been probably around for about an hour and then Matt met up with err with Kate and Gerry after. Me and Gerry you know I'm not sure what time it was, it was you know between three and four o' clock when, again looking for her. We went down err through past the Ocean Club reception, we went down err to the beach and ... UNQUOTE " (These fact were NOT confirmed either by Fiona Payne or by Dianne Webster).

About the infamous, disgusting tabloid, as one of the subservient and diligent spokesmedia for these criminals, wrote whatever was told to write, and has the validity it has: if it ever speaks against the McCanns, I take as valid information, all that in favor, I don’t.

From the rogatory interviews I divide the information into three basic categories:

- The one that is confirmed, which must be analysed at the time and circumstances first said, as well as to the why it was repeated;

- The one that contradicts the first, which must be analysed in terms of the what exactly is being contradicted and why is it being done:

- The new, which one must analyse as to the why it was only brought up then and not in previous statements. All three types of information may be legitimate, however these people have proved, much more often than not, that MISLEADING is their only survival tool.

So when David Payne states that he went to the beach at 4 a.m, for the first time in the rogatory interview, in 2008, all I can say is that if there is one thing that we can be certain, is that he could have gone to the moon and back, with or without Gerry, but he certainly didn’t go to the beach that night.

Imagine, for a moment that the fantasy was real

That, yes, the body was on the beach. And that, yes, he had gone down to the beach with Gerry, and that, yes, he David had gone into the sand, dug out Maddie, leaving Gerry spotless for the night, and that David, took it to wherever they had to take it..

Why on earth would he then mention that to the police? Completely out of the blue? Wanting to help out?!?

If he wants to help out he can come and do the reconstruction.

No, he never went to the beach.

So, I maintain what I said. That Gerry was accounted for all night. No, not every single minute, but certainly he didn’t behave oddly to the point of notice, and that is what I mean.

But, I’ll give him EVEN that.

Let’s suppose that both did go to the beach. He could have gone with David down to the beach at 4 a.m. He could even have been free ALL NIGHT to go. Free to pick up the body from where it and take it to where he wanted.

That maintains unaltered my statement that the fact that Gerry was alone at the time of the Smith Sighting, PROVES, that he didn’t place the body on any of the beaches.

And I said it, and remain saying it, it's proved because then only he, and he alone, would know where the body had effectively rested, be it in the sand, in a crevice or in a sewer.

Why do I maintain that? Because Gerry McCann, like all of us, cannot predict the future.

It’s completely irrelevant what happened next, what is important is what HE thought at that particular moment would happen next.

The only thing he is certain of, is that an alarm will be given, the authorities will come and that he, Gerry, will tell them that his daughter has been abducted.

From then on, he HOPES many things will happen, but is totally ignorant of what really will.

The GNR could just say, ok, we took notice of the occurred, suggest you look for your kid, and call you in the morning to see if there’s any news, or they could to inform Gerry (leaving then the body with nobody to get it) and Kate that they were under arrest.

These scenarios could have happened, as all other scenarios in between.

One thing would be expectable, and that would be that the parent’s would become the centre of attention.

Limited in whichever action they wished to take.

For that, they had to rely on their friends, never on themselves. So when Gerry is seen by the Smiths, apparently hiding the body, he simply doesn’t know if and when he’ll have an opportunity to retrieve the body.

It’s totally nonsensical to have him hide it, especially when he cannot risk not being able to retrieve it and allow it to be found by someone.

It would be a maneuver based solely on a fortuitous possibility to be able to come back and get the body.

No, not likely taking into account those involved.

The fact that Payne alleges going to the beach s is yet another Red Herring thrown by the Tapas, so that valuable time and resources are spent chasing useless leads.

The biggest “Tapas Red Herring” is, obviously the whole abduction theory.

About “The Sewer” video , it’s too important and enlightening not to have a separate post.

Another question placed by a reader was for me to explain better the physical differences between Gerry, Matthew and Russel. I when I picture each of them in my head, I think Gerry as “average”, Matthew “grey-haired” and Russel “big blonde hair”.