Textusa: The Making Of...

Wednesday, 31 March 2010

The Making Of...

In the MissingMadeleine Forum:
amethyst
Re: the smith sighting..credits to testusa at 21:03
(…) so gerry has got rid of madeleine and the obriens have agreed to him taking their child to parade around? please – sorry tanner's child wasn't even blonde as the smiths said

****
amethyst
Re: the smith sighting..credits to testusa at 21:13
(…) right so gerry took obriens sleeping child - with his permission - who wasnt even blonde and paraded her down the roads WAITING to be seen - like he knew the smith family would spot him - to show that another person/persons would spot an abductor sorry im seriously losing every single plot now

**** amethyst
Re: the smith sighting..credits to testusa at 10:28 pm
(…) that gerry found his daughter dead and convinced his mate ruseell to allow him to carry his child around pdl as some kind of decoy is exactly as mad as any volcano theory

In the New3A Forum:

kingfisher
Post subject: Re: The Smith Sighting - Textusa
Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 9:51 pm
IMHO, this is what happens when you spend too much time sitting at a computer. It is a great soufflé of detailed speculation based on the haziest idea of what Mr Smith actually said he saw. It's like doing a physical calculation to three decimals when your measurements are to the nearest half inch. Sorry to be negative.

****

Please don’t apologise. I fully understand your negativity.

13 comments:

IRONSIDE1 Apr 2010, 07:20:00
There seems to be confusion about the hair colour and the confusion is coming from Dr:Amarals book.

This is something I can explain ,in Mediterrean countries you are either Rubio ,blonde or Moreno, dark...Now, I have dark hair but am still called Rubio...because my hair is not black...Moreno here means black hair....Therefore if you do not have black hair you are considered Rubio blonde...I hope I have explained this well.

Here are the descripotions once again of the hair from the Smith family...
---------
Martin Smith said the childs hair was blonde to medium hued hair...

Aoife Smith...said the child had light/light brown, straight long hair to the neck.

-------

I hope this has cleared this up to Dr.Amaral if your hair is not black you are Rubio...Blonde
ReplyDelete
Replies
amethyst1 Apr 2010, 10:41:00
apologies are due, i was certain in my mind that JT's child was not blonde, obviously confusing her with another, besides that I still don't believe in this decoy theory because there's no evidence-i guess ROB was missing around the time of the Smith sighting and there is no real verification that GM was at the tapas at the time either, but still imo its too convoluted-could be wrong obviously - thanks ironside for the explanation
amethyst
ReplyDelete
Replies
Sandy Stone1 Apr 2010, 11:36:00
If one thing I have learned, the Mccanns are not stupid. The family are ALWAYS the first to be suspected when a child goes missing. Police look at family and close friends. This happened in the Marie Luz Cortez case.Uncles were taken in for questioning. Only then, when poilce were satisfied did they look outside the family circle.

The Mccanns KNEW this, therefore a much needed independent witness was needed to prove abduction took place. If Gerry had managed to damage the shutters, which I belive was the plan the apartment would have been classed as a forced entry. Jez Wilkins stopped this happening.

The ONLY ones to say Gerry was in the restaurant,Mitchells comment, there are many witnesses to say Gerry was there ,are from the Tapas. The only one to have seen this abduction was Tanner.

They had a witness and waited for the family to come forward , they did not. Jane had already planted a seed in the head of Police that night. But claimed she said nothing to the Mccanns because she did not want to upset them.

Witness did not come forward, now what do they do? Jane Tanner takes centre stage.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Sandy Stone1 Apr 2010, 11:42:00
Poor Jane who had no choice. Gerry told her ,just mention it to police as just a suggestion, tomorrow when the family come forward the police will take it from there.Poor Jane dropped herself right in it.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous1 Apr 2010, 14:05:00
In that photo of Tanner with a child, is it her daughter?Which one, the eldest or the youngest? That girl has blondish hair, I was under the impression that Tanner's eldest child, the one about Madeleine's age, had darker hair, maybe I was wrongly influenced by the child in that famous playground picture, where there is Madeleine playing with Gerry and there is also another girl, with her back turned to the camera, about the same age/size as Madeleine, but with light brown hair(not as dark as Tanner's, I mean), I assumed that was Tanner's eldest daughter, but maybe it wasn't. We have been told that Madeleine was small for her age, could it be that Gerry "borrowed" Tanner's younger child to "play" Madeleine?...
ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous1 Apr 2010, 14:41:00
Maybe I'm getting this all wrong! It is giving me a headache! If Gerry was indeed carrying one of Tanner's daughters, and as we know, they are both alive and in good health, then, for the child to be perfectly still, arms hanging down along the body, she had to be heavily sedated! If Tanner went along with this it means she and O'Brien had no problems with having their own flesh and blood drugged up to their eyeballs, with all the possible risks! My goodness, who/what are these people???!!!
It just cannot be due to the possibility of neglect charges, but to WHAT??? Will the world ever know the truth? I despair...
ReplyDelete
Replies
IRONSIDE1 Apr 2010, 14:48:00
http://www.youtube.com/user/xklamation

Some very good videos here ..many thanks to Joana Morais.
ReplyDelete
Replies
IRONSIDE1 Apr 2010, 16:59:00
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Tappas9/janetanneranddaughter.jpg

Yes Anon, I think something very like you are suggesting took place.
ReplyDelete
Replies
IRONSIDE1 Apr 2010, 17:08:00
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/OA3_8/03_volume_III_o_apenso_VIII_Page_608b_c.jpg

This photgraph the very famous playground shot. We have been told time and time again this is Gerry Mccann with Madeleine and the twins. But, look again the child with her back to us is not Amelie. Amelies hair is almost white, lighter than Seans. Therefore who is this child and why were we made to be believe it is Amelie?

Yes Anon it is a puzzle...Thanks for your comments.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous1 Apr 2010, 17:10:00
This makes me understand now why Jerry did not have cadaver on his clothes. He was creating an abduction with a live child.
ReplyDelete
Replies
Anonymous1 Apr 2010, 17:54:00
http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/4673/picture1ja.jpg

Back of Amelies head a stark difference to the child in the playground.
ReplyDelete
Replies
IRONSIDE1 Apr 2010, 18:58:00
Reading Dianne Websters statement once more. Dianne arrived with the Paynes at 9 p.m. She says Matt and Gerry were not there...she does not say if they ever return.

Dianne took her time going to the McCann apartment, she only mentions seeing Kate. Dianne steps outside and tries to lift the shutter, she cannot...Dianne goes back to the table to collect articles..She then goes back to the Mccanns apartment and THIS TIME she sees Mccann...

If McCann was not in the apartment with Kate...had he not yet returned from his trip around PDL?

Quote...

She adds that that night, and after the occurrence of the facts under investigation, she was in the apartment on two separate occasions. At the time described above she remained about 10 minutes in the apartment.

After this time she returned to the restaurant to get her handbag as well as the MCCANN couple's camera and "baby monitor" of her daughter, and was soon back again in the apartment.

The question being asked about the people that were inside the apartment of McCANN at that time, the witness said that the McCANN couple were present (although on the first occasion she had no recollection of having seen GERRY),

xxxxxx

Dianne the first time was in the apartment but it sems Kate was on her own ,only the second trip did Mccann put in an appearance. McCann had plenty of time..Jez slowed him down but he was missing for a good hour...
ReplyDelete
Replies
IRONSIDE1 Apr 2010, 20:05:00
A four year old named Mexicos Maddie abducted from her home, claimed her parents..Has been found dead in her home, her body was found in between the base and mattress of her bed. Parents were already under suspicion due to inconsistances in their statements.

http://mercedessigueaqui.blogspot.com/2010/04/caso-paulette-gebara-imposible-no-notar_01.html
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

Comments are moderated.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Textusa

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

MESSAGE to NEWCOMERS

This blog believes that concerning the MADDIE McCANN case the following happened:

- Maddie McCann died in the early evening of May 3^rd, 2007, in the Apartment 5A. We believe the death to have been accidental.

- At the time of Maddie's death the Praia da Luz's Ocean Club was hosting a large swinging holiday (which we believe took place in various locations in and around Praia da Luz - from Lagos to Sagres) in which the McCanns and friends were part of among many others.

- After Maddie's death a cover-up of unseen proportions and scope took place not to hide Maddie's death but with the main purpose of hiding the presence of swinging. To achieve that, Maddie's death had to be hidden.

- We don't believe there was any sort of negligence involved in the Maddie affair. We don't believe that T9 dined at Tapas Bar from Sunday to Wednesday. We think that on those nights they left their children with professional nannies - as did other guests - to go dine downtown PdL. On Thursday night they did use Tapas but that was simply part of what was to be "negligence" that was required to allow Maddie to be "abducted."

Luz - THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED

PdL - What a place. Why does anyone holiday there?
It's populated by black heroin addicts, people who rob apartments, gypsies who steal scrap and wood, scruffy moustachioed lurers of children, bogus charity collectors, suspicious street musicians, men lurking near phone booths, glasses man lurking in stairwells, blond men suspiciously lurking outside apartments, soothing couples entering apartments without permission, mysterious gangs of cleaners, men taking photographs of children on beaches... And to top it all, you have to queue for a table booking.
Anonymous 11Nov 2013 12:22:00

Maybe because you can always enjoy an ice-cream in the rain?
And a dip in an icy pool on arrival always attracts a crowd.
Textusa 11Nov 2013 12:28:00

I like the Tapas fragile chairs and tables. They wobble nicely when cutting thick grilled steaks spilling the drinks all about! It's fun for the whole family!
Anonymous 11Nov 2013 13:08:00

And how about the number of men seen carrying little blond girls in the street in the middle of the night?
Anonymous 11Nov 2013 14:04:00

PdL - where families take it in turn to vomit each night, dog packs pursue and bite joggers, guests fall off catamarans, damage tendons playing tennis, have shaving accidents and stagger around apartments bleeding, domestic appliances need repair, shutters jam, baby monitors won't function at restaurants, travel cots can't be assembled.. sounds like THE VILLAGE OF THE DAMNED.
Anonymous 12 Nov 2013 12:37:00

Comments to the post "Is Kate McCann a Liar?"

PJ's Declaration for Reopening Process:

"Madeleine McCann

As is the case with any situation in which a child goes missing, notwithstanding formal dismissal of the inquiry into her disappearance, and just as has always been publicly stated, the Polícia Judiciária never stopped paying close attention to any and all information that might possibly shed light on the whereabouts of the minor Madeleine McCann, the circumstances surrounding her disappearance and the identity of the perpetrator(s).

It was with this goal in mind that in March 2011 the National Director of the Polícia Judiciária entrusted a team of investigators from the North Directorate with the mission of reassessing, as a whole, the vast amount of information gathered during the inquiry, aimed at identifying data for which a more in-depth investigation might be useful and possible.

The reassessment which took place over the last two years and a half suggested new evidence to have surfaced, which, requiring the investigation to proceed, meets the requirements set out by section 279(1) of the Portuguese Code of Criminal Procedure for reopening of the inquiry.

Accordingly, a request for reopening was made to the Public Prosecutor for the jurisdiction of Portimao, and approval granted by the latter. "

link here

Ross's Poem

A friendly holiday from Hell
Left with so many lies to tell.
Darkness in the Place of Light
Carefully hidden in plain sight.

Of scribbled lists and secret pacts
Of cold black hearts and evil acts.
Of favours called and favours won
Of innocence lost and lives undone.

Unseen powers soon took hold
Ensuring truth would not be told.
The tale of a proud nation traduced
A mockery of the case reduced.

Serpentine words slither and slime
Cynical contortions concealing crime.
Conspiracy's such an easy word
To cow the narcoleptic herd.

If she ever was, she has gone.
Yet still the dance macabre rolls on.

Imagine...

"This says it all, Ms Loach hit the nail on the head!

"Ms Loach replied: “Imagine the public believing that you covered up your child’s death and then sought to make money out of it. They feel shame, humiliation and anguish."

Yes, that's exactly what we, the public, believe, because that's exactly what they did! And, their "shame, humiliation and anguish" are because they know we know!"

Comment posted by Anonymous to Textusa at Sep 16, 2013, 8:36:00 AM on "McCann vs Amaral Libel Trial" post referring to Mockumentary maker Emma Loach's testimony on the 1st day of said trial as one of McCann's defense witness.

Compliments from the Maggots' Lair:

(dcb2):

- “If ever CEOP should have a target it is textusa.”

- “…textusa is hidden unknown entity”

- “I would prefer textusa to be wiped off the internet.”

- “…all the others pale into insignificance when compared to textusa.”

- “I think she should be on the streets and off the internet"

Chinagirl):

- “Disgusting piece of slime.”

(Raptor):

- “Yikes ! That's disgusting.”

(preciousramotswe):

- “You are right. It's a shambolic mess of vitriol and obtuseness. But then they always are. The one that some claimed finally 'proved' who was carrying who during the Smith sighting is a masterpiece of deliberately confused arguments in which labrynthine plots are used to cover how empty the central thesis is”

in Such Nice Compliments!

Conversation from the "Lightless Zone"

sabot:

“Wot Round Table?”

bonnybraes1:

“He/she/it invented a barking mad 'theory' about no-one actually having eaten in the Tapas, because he/she/it couldn't grasp the table arrangements.”

So, because textusa doesn't understand stuff like that, all the Tapas group, the staff, everyone, were lying.

OMG - you don't suppose textusa is actually Gonc, do you?”

sansouci:

“Could be Bonny.

The 'theories' about the table and the watersports are really so far beyond bizarre, that I get the feeling that 'textusa' could actually be 'pisstaka'.”

Insane's IMPORTANT Comments

“…How would any of you idiots like it if your name came into the public domain because you were witness to a crime, and some mad bitch set up a site in which she called you a liar, and claimed you were actually involved in the crime you witnessed? Just ponder on that for a moment”

Aug 28, 2011 9:27:00 AM

“…Where is your sense of shame or decency in accusing innocent witnesses of being involved in covering up the death of a child?

I see no shame or decency on here - just an utter indifference to the rights or feelings of others.

I notice no-one had the balls to answer my question about how you would feel if this was done to you - if you were a witness to a crime and some deranged cow on the internet accused you of being involved. You are all a complete disgrace.”

Aug 28, 2011 1:09:00 PM

FOOT IN THE MOUTH DISEASE

Insane (Nov 14, 2012 11:37:00 PM):

Oh look here - amazing what one can find out by means of a couple of emails to Mark Warner.

You are toast, lady. Finished.

I am going to enjoy this more than is actually decent.

Textusa (Nov 15, 2012 8:50:00 AM):

Well it seems that you're quite privy with the Ocean Club aren't you?

Them giving YOU the information about their own mails?

And you threatening us based on information that YOU apparently got from the Ocean Club.

That's really interesting, isn't it?

Insane (Nov 15, 2012 10:47:00 PM):

One thing I really like about Mark Warner is how helpful their staff are. Really go the extra mile for someone needing information. IYKWIM

Textusa (Nov 16, 2012 11:17:00 AM):

Thank you for confirming that Mark Warner Staff are supplying YOU with information pertaining the Maddie Affair.

By all means, enjoy your reading!

comments in Swan Lake - Act 3

For those not familiar with the acronym IYKWIM it means If You Know What I Mean.

Confirmation of the above said:

"As for your remarks about childcare and Mark Warner - well, as you know, I have a Mark Warner contact. I feel it's only right that they should know about the malicious falsehoods you are spreading."

comment in Truth as Clue

Insane's Moment of Rare Beauty

“It would be more suspicious if every account tallied. Police expect to find contradictions, don't tell me you did not know this?” (Nov 22, 2012 3:38:00 PM), when providing an opinion on contradictions from various statements in the PJ Files.

“I don't give a rat's arse about the statements which tally too closely - of course some of them tally too closely, there is an in depth analysis of them on my blog, the one you are not invited to.” (Nov 22, 2012 4:08:00 PM), when, exactly 30 minutes later, provides an opposite opinion, in this case about the fact that some of Tapas' Staff's statements tally too closely.

Insane's Proposal for a New Legal Disclaimer

Textusa's new disclaimer. Please ignore all previous versions

''This blog expresses exclusively the exchange of ideas and opinions between people who have sniffed WAY too many solvents, and the imaginary people who live at the bottom of their garden, and so is not responsible for the enormous fines, possible imprisonment, or lifelong incarceration in a mental hospital which may result from it's content, as although it is on the interclickyweb, it is of a private nature, accompanied only by the voices in their heads, very much like any other conversation which takes place in a psychiatric ward between people rocking backwards and forwards in their seat and eating the wallcoverings, where FREEDOM OF SPEECH is exercised in the half hour per day of free association which the inmates are allowed.''

Comment NOT published but submitted on Aug 22, 2011 10:17:00 PM

INSANE'S BLOG

We waited so long for the link...

A possible explanation for the wait: "As I have made perfectly clear, you and your sort will never have access to my blog. We are particular about who we invite, and would not include screaming harpies and riff-faff like yourself." unpublished comment from Insane at Nov 23, 2012 10:55:00 AM

Then, a glimmer of hope? “Publishing elsewhere the posts Textusa refuses to publish is also appropriate - and also gives you fools a chance to read what she withholds from you, knowing that you would desert her if you were aware of how much trouble she leads you into.” (Nov 29, 2012 12:40:00 PM)

No, it wasn’t to be so… :“For the last time, you will never be provided with a link for my blog - you are not welcome there and will never be given access” (Nov 29, 2012 1:38:00 PM)