Sunday, 24 January 2010

Ripley's Believe It or NOT



(Jan 24th, 2010)

Dom GIRALDO 15.01.2010/21:50 Caso Joana, GA foi condenado a prisão : na sentença: "particularmente grave em pessoas têm obrigação combater crime" .Caso Maddie :"não foi conseguido qualquer elemento prova permita a um homem MÉDIO , à luz critérios da lógica , da normalidade e das regras gerais experiência , formular conclusão LÚCIDA , SENSATA , SÉRIA e HONESTA sobre circunstâncias que se verificou retirada criança apartamento, nem enunciar prognostico consistente " . Nada foi provado. O cão segundo o dono nada prova , apenas dá indicios. Cheiro a mortos ? Pode ter sido o coveiro do vizinho cemitério ter antes estado a fazer amor com uma inglesa; cheiro a sangue, foi a empregada que se terá ferido ... ADN parcial , com fertilização in vitreo ? GA não percebe nada 

 I was tipped about a newspaper column written by a Fernanda Constâncio, in the Diário de Notícias on Jan 15th, expressing her opinion about the on-going Trial (?) about the “Truth of the Lie”.

This opinion, coming from who it’s coming from, as well as its content deserves an exclusive post about it, even if only due to a certain Jorge Van Krieken commenting it favorably.

What she wrote can be summed up by giving reason for the McCann to proceed legally against Amaral, I started to read the comments in search of intelligent and coherent argumentation from the “other side” which is so scarce.

And I came upon this piece of enlightened rationale. Avoiding the task of translating the whole paragraph, as it's the same usual cr*p that we’ve grown used to, I will translate only the very, very UNUSUAL cr*p that it contains, the sentence that I put in bold: “Smell of dead? Could have been the graveyard digger from the neighboring cemetery that could have been there before making love with an English woman;”
Yes, you read it correctly. At least three times, if you did like I did.

Let’s not forget that the only one with an obscene mind here is me.

That’s an exclusive that has already been agreed upon by all parties, so I’m pretty much offended by this comment. Honestly, my sick, depraved and thwarted brain couldn’t have come up with something anywhere near this.

It’s irrelevant that graveyard diggers don’t smell of dead people as they don’t go anywhere near a body. They just dig up the grave. They just smell of dirt.

It must have been a naughty undertaker that had been romping around English (why on earth she had to be English? Any possible particular behavior from this nationality that makes a natural link to necrophilia that I’m not aware of?) damsel.

Everybody knows how that profession is known to seduce lonely housewives. Who doesn't know a joke involving an undertaker and infidelity? There are millions fo them.

I’m not sure how many funeral homes are there in PdL, but I do suggest to Mr. Dave Edgar to go on an immediate coffin-opening adventure in the area.

Another irrelevant detail, is the places where the dogs picked up the smell in the apartment: between the couch and wall, and in the cupboard. Both, reasonable places for a couple to make-love.

Don’t mock it if you haven’t tried, and I haven’t, so I’ll just take this commentator's word for it.

The scent might have been there left by the undertakers leaving his clothes lying “around” neatly bundled in between the couch and a wall, and in the shelf of a cupboard.

A known and perfectly logical behavior whilst undressing in the midst of passion: “Let’s put half of my clothes in the cupboard and the other half behind the couch.” And nowhere else, because nowhere else in the apartment was the scent picked up.

But, wait a second. If that was the case, then Kate’s clothes, where the dogs also picked up the scent in (we all know she contacted 6 (?) dead people before coming to Portugal, thus justifying the scent), would have contaminated the WHOLE apartment and the cadaver dog would have had a feast inside, which it didn't…

Nope, have to discard the clothes-discarding theory..

Left only with the love making. Gosh, what a afternoon that must have been.

As I said, its not the ignorance that is the fact. It’s the fact that the ignorance is so lightly taken as fact. And so lightheartedly written and accepted, even if only by the author, as fact, just to justify the unjustifiable.

If you’ve been invited, please don’t forget your check book. It’s on the 27th.

Believe it or not.

25 comments:

  1. Há todo o tipo de ascensão e de culto do umbigo.Daí que a "distinta" e o "distinto" façam favores.
    Maria

    ReplyDelete
  2. o d.giraldo, de letra pequena anda a esmerar-se: disse a uma Senhora(nome feminino) que ela deveria ser preta!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Obrigado pelo bom humor - é realmente a única maneira de encarar certas imbecilidades que se escrevem por ai...
    Cumsps.

    Nuno

    ReplyDelete
  4. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/35044105#35044105


    Half way through the video Mccann says there so NO evidence to implicate us in her DEATH:

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mr. Ripley

    é uma personagem extremamente perversa,não é?

    Criminosa,impune,desonesta,vil e tido por aí fora.

    E, em alguns filmes até se dá entender que a frágil mulher,ligada à música, até o ajuda em pormenores.

    Só gostei de um DVD com o John Malkovich; parecia "melhorzinho".



    Gosto de os ler os livros de Patrícia Higsmith !
    Do que um ser é capaz!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Maria, this is another Ripley, who if ever exited, used to publish a page in an american paper with bizarre and unthinkable events, people and things.

    This led to a museum of the freak. In Portugal a similar thing would be called a "Museu de Coisas do Entroncamento".

    In Ripley's its things from all over the wold, where this McCann thing will hopefully one day be exihibited.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Isto:

    Ripley's Believe It or Not: Curioddities (Hardcover)

    http://www.amazon.com/Ripleys-Believe-Not-Ripley-Publishing/dp/1893951235

    ???????

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dom Giraldo(letra pequena)(o Sem Pavor)
    para Anónimo Mentiroso(?)Não chamei "preta" a ninguém.
    Recém chegado verifico que a maioria dos b. têm falta (entre outras coisas) de uma honestidade intelectual
    que permita uma lúcida e honesta discussão .A.C. diz que McCann são protegidos por serem brancos . Limitei-me a fazer "BOM HUMOR"(sic): = presumo ser "preta"
    perdoem-me=
    Aqui também há censura ?

    ReplyDelete
  9. D. Giraldo,

    We fully understand your concern and present you with a full set of apologies.

    You were totally misunderstood like that great known intelectual, the actress Jennifer Lopez, who said "I didn't do anything illegal, I just broke the law."

    Your IQ is self-identitly abnormal that the majority of the population is unable to understand you.

    In the name of society and humanity itself, I do apologise and appeal to your understanding.

    Very respectfully (a phenomenon of nature like yourself HAS to be respected)

    ReplyDelete
  10. d. giraldo limitou-se a fazer então humor muito negro.

    Fui eu quem chamou aqui a atenção para esse negro humor/comentário

    ReplyDelete
  11. Censura,não há! Modos e boas maneiras de gente boa,sim.

    ReplyDelete
  12. copio e colo:

    Dom GIRALDO
    24.01.2010/15:06

    ALEXANDRA CORREIA................ .Se não entendeu , "miolos e ovos" é bom remédio ..............
    Dom GIRALDO
    24.01.2010/14:50

    ALEXANDRA CORREIA presumo ser "preta"(perdoem-me..) e analfabeta(para-analfabeta,"ad minus" analfabeta juridica)


    **************

    E não se pode exterminá-los? Os comentários sem humor e delicadeza?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Text: não tem a ver com as nossas preocupações mas chamo a atenção para os 2 HOMENS de Pt e mais os seus cães que no Haiti salvaram duas pessoas.
    Grandes Homens,grandes cães pisteiros!


    E, para o facto (todos nos emocionamos) de uma Menina de Pt, filha de um Oficial da F. Aérea ter enviado pelo Pai uma boneca dela e ser dada a uma Menina de lá,Haiti. Vi essas imagens.
    O pequenino de UK que tomou igualmente uma inciativa de ajuda,muito louvável,vem na Tv. Mas esta Menina Portuguesa,para mim, merece ser divulgada!

    ReplyDelete
  14. http://blogs.news.sky.com/lifeofcrime/Post:966953a1-81cf-425d-846e-917581b397c5

    É de ler os comentários...


    por ex.:

    What's this about, Martin? The McCanns may not have called Sky news themselves but are you denying no one else did? Anyway, any word from the CEOP conference Gerry was supposed to have been speaking at today?

    ReplyDelete
  15. p ois c erida maria :
    desde já AGRADECIDO .
    "não concordar", já é uma forma de
    censura?)
    Com o principio do "indefensável"
    ainda estariamos "na pedra lascada"
    São "boas maneiras" fazer citações
    truncadas ?... maneiras de fugir ao essencial ?
    CORAJOSA ! Pretender exterminar
    Dom Giraldo com 18 séculos de História !
    Aposto que é "Aquário" ...
    saúde , dinheiro e amor ...
    (n.b. "in casu" (maddie) nem a sua tese nem a contrária , estão provadas (nem juridica nem cientifica).Apenas convicções .
    No "mundo cão" ainda encontramos especulação...)
    Humor negro : "coveiro" é um argumento de natureza penal.
    Uma pergunta inocente : está provado que Maddie estava no apartamento ? )

    ReplyDelete
  16. DG,

    "Nigger/preta" in ref to race colour is a humourless, offensive expression independent of context or editing.

    Don't keep using humour as an expression, you lack intelligence to use it in any way, shape or form.

    If Madeleine wasn't in the apartment, then where did she disappear from? Her parents say it was from there. I do too. We only differ in the fact that they say she left that apartment alive and on the arms of an abductor, I say she left dead in the arms of her father.

    Please don’t answer. Your foot is too deep in your mouth for you to be perceptible.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Illustrate "girl" that - (as opposed so thinking) - well know ...
    I'll make her happy : I will close
    the barn , but rather down to their level , I give you free advice: go to your gynecologist because it has webs spider in the head !!!
    (THIS , incidentally , under the
    "freedom of expression" that so
    stoically defends)

    ReplyDelete
  18. Nope.

    As predicted, inperceptible.

    You’re like a lake in a golf course. I keep hitting the balls, you keep, endlessly swallowing them hook, line and sink. And just as much fun.

    Had a riot with your “gyno” joke. Imagine I’ll rupture my spleen once I understand it.

    Hope F. Cancio appreciates your support. I thank God to be able not to count you as one of our own.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Maria..Can find nothing on CEOP nor Halligen...Very very strange..

    ReplyDelete
  20. Bom dia,Text!

    Bom dia, Iron!

    Tke link go to 152 comments:
    Madeleine McCann And A Load Of Nonsense
    Martin Brunt January 26, 2010 6:12 PM
    * Recommend post (152)
    BUT I follow the truth...truth (You put here) and nothing!


    Of course it is very strange, probably a "comedy"....and,also at the roof gardens we saw Journalists,the couple,two men beside and....4 persons.We don´t know if was there....also.....


    TEXT: You know that I don´t know english,please correct.

    And I liked Ironside´s question; your´s firt answer and i am waiting also the follow answer. ( I am like a child very young writing in "english")

    ReplyDelete
  21. Bom Dia, Anon...

    Yes the Pink Ponce it would seem was present...

    With thanks to Jill..

    If you would like to smile today pop over to Joana Morais...for Oscar Night.

    http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.com/2010/01/kate-and-gerry-mccann-exclusive-photos.html

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anon your english is very good..take a look and smile...

    http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2010/01/sardine-muncher-productions-presents.html

    ReplyDelete
  23. COWARD BLAIR sneaks in through back door.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1246958/Tony-Blair-Iraq-inquiry-Former-PM-refuses-face-public-sneaks-early.html

    ReplyDelete
  24. http://littlemorsals.blogspot.com/2010/01/exclusive-photo-from-kensington-roof.html

    'Exclusive' from Sasha at Little Morsals...

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Textusa