Maddie's Cube

This time last year we opened our 2012 season with our post “Textusa Is Giving Up On Maddie”, where we told you how far we thought the system would allow the truth to go and not an inch further. 

This year we will be doing almost the exact same thing. With a difference. This year we are going to take a whole lot of inches, even yards, away as how far we think truth is to be known. The Official Truth that is.

There's only one thing that's above the Law, any Law, and that's the Truth.  That's why Law has to adapt to Truth and not Truth to Law.

As Official Truth is what the Justice System has deemed truth to be, it's superseded by Factual Truth. 

Societies do strive for the Official Truth and the Factual Truth to be one and the same. But we've seen that if there's a case where the two are as far dissociated as is possible they can be, that case is the Maddie Affair.  

It's only comparable with the JFK case but not even this one can compare with Maddie's. First, because it involved a conspiracy to kill a man and a conspiracy involves much fewer people than a cover-up; second, it didn't engage people from all sectors of society as happened with the Maddie case and lastly it involved national security (the assassination of a President of the US does justify all the secrecy put around the case) while in Maddie's we're all unable to see what possible and realistic threat to the UK or Portugal could be posed by a couple of doctors and their 7 friends.

We at Textusa strive to find the Factual Truth. The reason(s) why the Justice Systems of two Countries choose to ignore, discard or change it to come up their Official Truth, is for them to know. 

We remain respectful of their decisions as we respect all State Institutions, as is the Justice System, and in no way wish to set up any sort of parallel popular courts to pronounce an obviously illegal tar-and-feather condemnation.

We respect their decisions but we may disagree with them. As such we believe we have the absolute right to voice the reasons of our disagreement. 

And as long as the Official Truth remains distant from the Factual Truth we'll keep on voicing our disagreement.  

This post was going to be called “Great Readers Make Great Posts – 2”, the "2" because we've used the title before. 

It was going to have that title because we first thought of making the post up solely with the compilation of some of the comments that we received on our “These Bothersome Elderlies” post. At the end of the post you can read the transcription of the comments we mean (*).

A blog that has readers like we do simply has no reason to make any sort of New Year’s wishes. We're sure that there are many people out there that can use an extra 3 wishes so we forfeit the use of ours and allow them to be used by those that need them the most.

These comments have hit the crux of what has been the Maddie Affair ever since the case was archived: what new evidence are we waiting for? What new evidence is it possible to find? Is there ANY new evidence, besides a confession, that CAN be found? 

Anon #29 almost nails it to a tee: find or stumble on the body, someone confessing or the lost scientific evidence that was sent to the UK making reappearance.

Anon #29 just forgot, in our opinion, the reappearance of a certain blue bag last seen photographed in a closet in a holiday resort in Portugal.

Other than these four possibilities is there any other? If so we'd be grateful if somebody identified them.

If our reader is right and the body has been cremated then we remain only with three possibilities and all of them depend on anything but randomness. 

And even if someone wants to confess who would they confess to? To police they know to have collaborated in the cover-up? That could be qualified by many terms and stupidity is one that occurs to me.

So we're left with the forensic evidence. The one from the Apartment, the one from the rented car and the one from the blue bag. The release of any of it is only authorised, I'm certain, by someone high in the hierarchy. Very high. Yes, THAT high.  

All this makes us conclude that there's NO NEW EVIDENCE to be found anywhere, not even with the  SY's 195 new leads.

So how is the case to unfold if all is in a rut? The Black Hats don't know and we also haven't any idea, as you'll see in the next post. 

But are we lost or giving up on the issue? No, of course not. We're still well on course and sailing on charted waters.

Let us tell you where we think the Maddie Case is at in this point in time. 

Remember our "The McCann Game, shortly out of tricks?" post back in 2009? The one where we said that in a Bridge game with each trick played it meant that each player held one less card and that meant that the mystery of your opponent's cards got closer to being disclosed?

The Black Hats currently have a big, no, huge problem on their hands. You see, they've run out of tricks. The fountain is dry. Completely dry. Playing the Hewlett hand again showed clearly that there’s nothing left in the bag. And the feeble way they played it shows how they don't know what to come up with next. 

So now we have the players, all holding their last card, all knowing exactly what card all other players are holding and all wracking their brains on how to delay the game by stalling or preferably stopping time altogether. 

All of them wishing how they could restart the game and all of them now regretting the arrogant, careless and nonchalant manner with which they threw those first cards on the table. Only when well into the the game did they start to realize the amount of mistakes made and began to try to reinvent suits, trumps and even rules.

All they know is that they CAN'T call it quits and that they are making things exponentially worse instead of better by letting time pass by.

Now they’re in a rut, we've already said so. We've also said they don't know what to do. They really don't .

To understand this you have to understand what is at stake. I propose that we play the Maddie's Cube.

Let’s first understand what is the Maddie’s Cube. Start to imagine the PJ Files as a cube:

The PJ Files' Cube publicly shows all the facts known by the Authorities. 

Please do not confuse Facts known with Factual Facts. All the PJ Files contain is a collation of evidence. For example, it’s fact that it contains many statements but as we know by now very little of them have true facts in them, but we also know by now each one of those lies constitute evidence.

Trillions of words have been written and printed about the case. The Maddie Affair is much more than the PJ Files. The Maddie's Cube is a much larger cube, and in it, amongst many things, it contains the PJ Files' Cube:

What is in Maddie's Cube besides the PJ Files' Cube? Well, we’ve all been aware that over the Maddie Affair has always hovered a bleak sky filled with Dark Clouds:

We’ve come up with the above 43 Dark Clouds, in alphabetical order:

01. Absence of Body

02. Algarve’s Ex-Pats Collaboration

03. Coincidences Galore

04. Diplomatic Interference

05. Diplomatic Pressure

06. Discrediting Dogs Campaign

07. Discrepancies Discarded or Ignored

08. Disinformation Campaign

09. Forensic Evidence Witheld in UK

10. Fraudulent Fund

11. Goncalo Amaral Slander Campaign

12. Guests’ Nepotistic Network

13. Hiring of Multiple Dubious Private Investigators

14. Hiring of Multiple Very Expensive Lawyers

15. Image Management Campaign

16. Immoral & Amoral Merchandizing Setup

17. Inconvenient Blogs Wooshed

18. Inconvenient Forums Wooshed

19. Internet Bullying

20. Internet Disruptive Actions

21. Jim Gambles’ CEOP Collaboration

22. Libel Terror Campaign

23. Misinformation Campaign

24. Misleading Blogs

25. Misleading Forums

26. Non-Existent Pictures of Tapas Dinners (BRT)

27. Non-Existent Pictures of Tennis Playing

28. Non-Existent Pictures of Water Sports

29. Ocean Club‘s Involvement

30 Ocean Club Staff Wooshed Out of Luz

31 PDL Anglican Priests Collaboration

32 PDL’S Ex-Pats Involvement

33 Photofits Withheld in UK

34 PJ Slander Campaign

35 Portuguese Justice System’s Collaboration

36 Portuguese PGR’s Collaboration

37 Public & Wealthy Figures’ Collaboration

38 Scotland Yard’s Collaboration

39 Statements Withheld in UK

40 Total Commitment of Algarve‘s British Press

41 Total Commitment of Whole UK Press

42 UK Justice System’s Collaboration

43 Withheld Credit Cards Statements

Have we missed any? Surely there may be more as we all know how fogs are frequent in the British weather, especially in the London area, so many may have escaped our eyes.

These Dark Clouds vary in size, importance, density, darkness, and number of “rain-droplets” each  contain, but they do have one thing in common and that is that they're all are inside Maddie's Cube:

Quite complex as can be seen. Each of these Dark Clouds merits a dedicated post, most of them more than one. Some we have written and published, others we have written and kept in our archives and many are still to be written.

So if anything else, the figure above shows our "friends" that come here from time to time and claim that we haven't anything else to write about, how wrong they are after 487 posts, including this one.

We realize that we could've added other Dark Clouds. We're sure you will point out some that have escaped us. One that came to mind was the Blue Bag. As we thought it could fall under UK's Justice System Collaboration, or under Forensic Evidence Withheld in the UK, or under PDL's Ex-Pats Involvement and even under Guests' Nepotistic Network we decided to leave the Blue Bag "cloudless", so to speak.. 

On the other hand we could have put all of the "Non-Existent Photos" into only one Dark Cloud but we decided to separate them, Tapas Dinners (BRT), Water Sports and Tennis Playing, because each absence means a completely different thing and has completely different set of implications. 

As we're on the subject of photos, have you ever seen a group of 9 friends, plus kids, who book their holidays together and have so few, or practically no holiday photos at all? Of the group I recall only the Paraiso photos and even in those the McCanns are missing. Pity no one remembered to take a picture when they were ALL walking all the way to The Mill on their first night in Luz as it might have been the only activity they did together. As a group of 9, that is.

Note that none of the Dark Clouds has the "conspiracy" word in it. This happens not because of our stubborness but because the word just isn't applicable. But if you look at the Dark Clouds as a whole you can easily see what indeed happened: a massive cover-up. 

And it's also perceptive, in our opinion, how "embarrassingly compromising" it would be to the relationship between Portugal and the UK if the diplomatic correspondence that went on in the Summer of 2007 between the UK Embassy in Lisbon and London  was to be revealed publicly.

The fact that neither the McCanns nor the remainder T7 also don't appear is because they're there but sprinkled on more than one cloud. However they had little or no power or influence in any of them.

As the violent storm it was, it grew in strength, it didn't just appear strong and violent. Not all clouds appeared at once as is obvious. 

This is how we think this would be Force 5 Hurricane spawned and became the devastating monster it became:

The moment Maddie died, those present understood the seriousness of the situation. I would say that it didn't take more than 10/15 minutes for the "Mother of All Dark Clouds", the Guests' Nepotistic Network one, to be sparked alive. After all, I'm sure it was quickly understood that it was the Guests' reputation that was at stake as it was the most dangerously vulnerable and who would suffer the most if ever it was to be known the goings on at the Ocean Club at the time.

The Guests' Nepotis Network cloud very quickly spawned both the Ocean Club's Involvement and the PDL's Ex-Pat's Involvement. That was when it was decided to go for the abduction scenario, to get Gerry to stroll around PDL with Tanner's daughter until he was seen, to decide where to take the body first and from there to where and when, to decide for the "group" to be seen dining that night at Tapas and to decide when and how the alarm would be given which, as we know, Kate mistimed completely her cue and spoiled the whole thing.

Once the most urgent matters were taken care of, the nepotism began. Still on the 3rd, the Guests' Nepotistic Network started to spread it's tentacles and quickly pull strings and call in favours and overdue debts. On the night from the 3rd to the 4th many a phone call was made and other Dark Clouds began to take form and grew in strength: PDL's Anglican Priests' Collaboration, Diplomatic Interference and Diplomatic Pressure, UK Justice System's Collaboration, Total Commitment of UK Media and Algarve's Ex-Pats Collaboration.

By noon of May 4th these Dark Clouds were fully developed, in place and fully acting. And they successfully contained what was to be contained. The world, yes, the WORLD, centered its attention on that British couple, both doctors, whose daughter had been abducted from her room while they were dining nearby with the friends they were spending their holidays with.   

Not a word about or a glance toward ANY other guest that could also be present at THAT resort nor about the unusual number of people there for that particular time of the year. Why should there be? The first combat was completely and absolutely won by a First Round Knock Out. The Adversary stood no chance.

Who was the Adversary? It was all of us worldwide but the UK public in particular as they are completely and utterly ruthless when it comes to sex-scandals. 

The KO was so lethal that the Adversary didn't even get the opportunity to understand that he was the opponent in a fight that he didn't know was taking place. We were all "floored" by sympathy towards the couple and anguish and heartfelt concern for the little girl we were told had been abducted.

Let History books register that remarkable feat very clearly. and we hope that the history books do because it was fact.

The remainder Dark Clouds formed with time and convenience, one after the other until it became a huge, huge storm. 

An uncontrollable one even though those that were at its helm thought they did. Time has shown they didn't.

Just do the maths: add up the number of people that each Dark Cloud may implicate and see how staggeringly big the thing really was and still really is, and probably many things will become clearer and clearer...

Now add the PJ Files' Cube to make the Maddie's Cube COMPLETE:

. 
Its unquestionable complexity is quite similar to that of the Rubik's Cube: 

The Rubik Cube has 43,252,003,274,489,856,000 permutations possibilities and that is if you only turn its  sides. The number increases to 519,024,039,293,878,212,000 if you disassemble the thing!

Like Maddie's Cube it's very complex, even mind boggling at first, but once its subtle mechanisms are understood it becomes a quite an easily solvable three dimensional puzzle. A certain Feliks Zemdegs from Australia solved it in an incredible 5,66 seconds!

There you have it. All you have to do is solve it:

But is Maddie's Cube as easily solvable as Rubik's Cube?

No, and VERY far from it. 

Not that its mechanisms haven’t been fully understood, because they have, fully and completely. 

However the solution requires humongous doses of Political Willpower & Courage that we don’t see be mustered in the near future:

When we say that it requires humongous doses of Political Willpower & Courage we are in no way attributing any cowardice to the current politicians. 

Those in power back in the summer of 2007, Blair, Brown and Socrates, did leave a lot to be desired in the areas of courage and decency on the Maddie Case. 

Current politicians now have this extremely hot potato burning in their hands.

All because of ONE thing.

That ONE thing has changed completely the whole game board. Really. It changed it so radically that it if applied to Rubik's Cube it would mean that instead of having the 519 quintillion (or just the  43 quintillion permutations depending on you disassembling the cube or not, as said above) it would have only ONE and only ONE possible solution.

That's what a staggering and earth-shattering change it does mean. 

You ask, as you're entitled to ask, with so many Dark Clouds, both named and unnamed, plus the PJ Files you're stating that all boils down to one single thing? 

Yes, I am. Being bold and beautiful.

Let me explain. Imagine that when whoever (no, we don't think the McCann letter did it) convinced David Cameron to go for the SY Review, "Redwood of SY" thought he had been invited to some sort of a "Big Fish Fishing Trip in the Middle of the Ocean", only to find out instead, already well into his adventure trip, that what he really had been invited to was a "Big Fish Fishing Trip in the Middle of the Desert".

I just changed ONE word. A SINGLE word. The word Ocean with the word Desert. Just ONE word.

And with that SINGLE word change instead of imagining "Redwood of SY" out in the middle of the sea pulling in, with the most modern fishing rod, the biggest Blue Marlin you ever saw, you imagine the same "Redwood of SY" with the same modern fishing rod embarrassingly sitting in the middle of a sea of sand under a scorching Sun and getting warmer by the minute, crying for water to... drink. 

Now, can you see the humongous doses of Political Willpower & Courage that is required to solve the Maddie Case? Thus far, "Redwood of SY", to rescue whatever dignity he still can, has pretended that the Desert dunes surrounding him are in reality Ocean waves and that the various tones of pale yellow of sand are but 195 possible tones of blue.  Preferably, as we've seen he avoids speaking about this particular "trip".

But pretending has a limit. The bait has all dried and shriveled up and the waves simply aren't moving! Smiling to the camera hurts more and more as the lips get more and more gritted. The Sun is ruthless and a man has to drink, hasn't he?

He shouldn't be too harsh on himself though. Many have fallen for the siren's call so he's not the first nor will he be the last.

What does an experienced sailor do when he knows he's about to enter into mermaid seas? He ties himself to the mast. Tightly and with orders to the only deaf seaman not to untie him until the ship has passed the deceiving seas and is on safe waters.

Apparently "Redwood of SY" was more entertained with his new fishing rod than with in being tied up, no pun intended. How now he must be thinking "Oh, if only I hadn't listened!".

But all about this ONE thing we'll leave for another time, in a story involving a horse, a polo mallet, an iron and Fred's fear of uttering a sound.

Even though we proclaim that the Maddie Case is practically an unsolvable case for many reasons in general and the one we that we will deal with in the next post in particular, none of which happened on May 3rd, 2007, we’ll continue to fight and strive for Maddie's Cube to be one day solved:

Or even TRANSPARENTLY solved:

As we all survived the Mayan, and Hollywood, prediction of end of the world in 2012 let's now face 2013 in the eye and see what it reserves for us.




(*) Transcription of the comments that we received on our “These Bothersome Elderlies” post and referred to in the present post:  

"21. Anonymous said...

There is a discussion around, if the victims of the media will turn themselves against Cameron, in the next elections.

One is wondering if Gerry will take part in it.

Cameron did a great favor to the McCanns, the Yard in the case, and will they turn themselves against him?

The solution is to hurry up with the green light from Portugal, to start the process.

Dec 4, 2012 10:39:00 PM"


"29. Anonymous said...

#21

Portugal doesn’t have nor does it depend on Portugal to give any green light to open the process. It depends only on Britain.

The process was archived in Portugal and will be reopened if any new evidence is produced or by the wish of the parents.

We know there’s no new evidence. Whatever may be new about the case lies in Britain.

These are the possibilities that I see for the case to reopen:

1. Find the body. I believe that by now there’s no body and that Maddie has long been cremated, so this isn’t even a possibility. But if there’s a body it can only be found if someone from Britain says where it is.

2. Someone confessing. That would be in Britain.

3. The scientific evidence that “disappeared” be found and sent to Portugal. That would be Britain’s doing.

So please don’t put the responsibility on Portugal to reopen the process. That responsibility is ONLY of Britain and not coming out saying that they have 195 new leads or that they are coordinating with the Porto PJ.

We all know who is guilty of what. We may not know the details of what exactly happened but have a general idea. No abduction, massive post-mortem cover-up.

We also know that only a British political decision will reopen the case.

You want the case reopened? Ask David Cameron. He’ll reopen it for you. If he wants to. He doesn’t. Not right now at least.

Dec 5, 2012 11:18:00 AM"


"31. Anonymous said...

Imo, nothing depends on Britain but on Portugal because the crime happened there and not in the UK. Who told you that there is no new evidence?

At the end of BBC Panorama The Last Hope, the journalist said that the Met had new evidence. If they had it, they must have sent it to the PJ.

And maybe Portugal has new evidence too and it is not talking about it now.

Where cremated? In Portugal? Using a crematorium without calling the attention of its owner? What a risk!

About the green light: I'm not accusing Portugal of anything. I'm saying that Portugal has to be ready with the review, with the information it is getting from the Yard and ,after all of that, it can give the green light in order to reopen the case, to make the reconstruction, to arrest the parents and some of the Tapas.

You got to realise that the final step has to come from the PJ.

The Yard can not talk now, before the PJ allow them to do so.That is what I mean with the green light.

I agree with you: The Met police must know a lot by now but they have to wait because it is a Portuguese matter.

Dec 5, 2012 1:55:00 PM"


"33. Anonymous said...

#31

No you don’t agree on anything with me so don’t go saying you do because it won’t buy you any sympathy.
 
I was right in having been suspicious of your words about your utter belief in the SY and your "green light" from Portugal.

The crime did happen in Portugal so the majority of the legal proceedings will take place in Portugal. Other legal proceedings such as those related with the Fund will be in the UK. These don't need any sort of green light from anywhere but Britain so if SY has the new evidence you proclaim they should start at once to declare publicly that there was no abduction and that the Fund will be under immediate investigation. That will give a clear sign to all that the SY really want to solve this case truthfully. If they don't it's not because of the lack of a green light from Portugal.

The Yard can talk and do all it wants so the can the PJ. Neither force depends on each other for anything. If there was any sort of coordination between them the SY wouldn’t have come out publicly with the 195 leads that have apparently led nowhere except to the public embarrassment of the Met and goes to prove the forces act separately and independently.

You speak of BBC. Are you talking about the same BBC that broadcast the F-word slander against Amaral and then took ages to recognize, very unperceptively I must add, its error and didn’t have the common decency or politeness of publicly apoligising to the man they had so violently defamed?

The journalist, you say, said the Met had new evidence. Are we talking about the same Met that as of May last year until now has produced “195 new leads” that not only is an absurd number as the only thing it achieved was to ridicule SY itself?

And what new evidence? Please do by all means clarify on certain terms what you mean. You don’t have to prove anything. Just typify what kind of new evidence you think they must have.
Is it a new abductor? Two new abductors? A dozen new abductors? Because that’s as far my imagination can go outside the PJ Files.

As I see it besides a new abductor all the rest is in there as Textusa has been proving all along and comments like yours do try so hard to deride her readers from her writing.

You say if they had it they must send it to the PJ. Well why don't they start by sending all the forensic evidence that got lost somewhere in Britain? That’s not new evidence, that’s an old one that somebody conveniently hid in some cabinet.

After doing that why don't they also send all the statements that were withheld in Britain from witnesses like those such as JW?

Who told me that there was no new evidence? The PJ Files did. The PJ Files are very clear that there isn’t any new evidence to be found. The investigation was thorough and properly done.

The continuance of the existing evidence is what is required, to allow the investigation to proceed without outside influence and tie up all the little loose ends, like the forensic results and unsent statements, so that all accountable can be charged according to the law.

This with the legal proceedings in Portugal. About the Fund it's not required any forensic results or withheld statements. It's up to Britain to kick off that investigation
(cont)

Dec 5, 2012 4:06:00 PM"


"34. Anonymous said...

(cont)
You come up with the classic “it can’t be because it can’t be” reasoning about the body being cremated with your “Where cremated? In Portugal? Using a crematorium without calling the attention of its owner? What a risk!

Yes, I remember that one of the reasons the Black Hats presented for the man seen in the Smith Sighting not to be Gerry was “What a risk!”

You have to change your tune I’m afraid. Who said it was in Portugal? Who said it was cremated? I said that it was my opinion and didn't refer a place and all that has the value of what it is, an opinion. And my opinion is that Maddie was cremated. Where I don't know but that could have been done in either Country, risk-free, based on my conviction that this cover-up had Top-Brass support from both of the Countries so if the body was to be cremated, it simply was. The “owner” knew very well what he was doing. And you want to know my opinion when it happened? Sometime shortly before Gerry said arrogantly “show me the body to prove that Maddie is dead”. But again that’s my opinion and although valueless I’m entitled to express it.

Soft spoken words may sound like music but if people listen closely it’s the hissing sound of a snake.

Dec 5, 2012 4:07:00 PM"


"35. Anonymous said...

Anon #33/#34 Brilliant post!

The fact that SY is not moving in on the Fund is the very proof that their investigation about Maddie has been biased from the start. All British Media have called one way or another the PJ incompetent.

It's been 18 months of worthless guzzling up our tax-payers money because they were sent not on mission to investigate but on one to end up with the results that they were set up to end and they've flunked completely!
 
By the way, with the forensic results and assorted statements they could also send the credit card records that were asked for. I bet those records would tell a much truer story than Jenny Murat despite all her want to get back at those that stabbed her and her family in the back!

Dec 5, 2012 5:45:00 PM"


"36. Anonymous said...

Anon 33

You raise a very interesting point!

I’ve heard time and time again about NEW EVIDENCE. It’s what is supposed to open the pandora’s box that is this whole issue.

Now that you ask you made me think.

What NEW EVIDENCE is there that can be found? We know that there was no abduction so anymore stories like the Hewlett one will stick as much as water on a peeled potato. Outside the abduction scenario there’s the evidence that will further incriminate those that were in PDL!

So you’re absolutely right. Unless there’s a confession or a formal accusation from the SY there will NEVER be NEW evidence to reopen the file.

It’s a purely political decision. If the British politicians are willing to commemorate year after year the “unsolved disappearance” of Maddie plus the inevitable comparison to Maddie of every child that disappears worldwide for many years to come with all the embarrassment it implies or they take action and restore dignity to Britain.

No tapas dinners means no abduction. A not credibly solved Maddie case means no dignity for Britain. It may not be outspoken but it will always be lurking over every Brit both in and out of the Country.

Dec 5, 2012 5:59:00 PM"