Silence Says So Much

In the previous post, Not Even Alice in Wonderland, we left out the simplest part of it, but as it was getting too long we decided to leave it for this one and that was to explain why, in our opinion, does Edgar show TS and her mom walking on the right-hand side of the street instead of in the left side where the PJ Files say TS says she was.

We’ve shown you the path TS imagined in her head was and on which she based her entire statement of her FIRST sighting of Pimpleman:

We've also shown you how that same path should've been when transposed to reality:

We have then two paths: a natural and realistic path (blue) and a desired (by the BHs) one (red):

Dave Edgar must have racked his brain and rehearsed the scene a thousand times and then a thousand times more, and kept coming up with the same answer that we showed you to be and that was that reality and imagination don’t match:

To have TS walk the red path, it is impossible for TS’s mom to not have seen the man straight ahead:

She could have said that she'd not taken in as much detail as her daughter did, but she would have had to acknowledge that she saw a man where her daughter says she saw one.

She wouldn’t have to go into too much detail, maybe just say that she was mainly focused on the dogs and that yes, she does vaguely remember that there was a man with a black jacket in that pathway when they crossed the street. But she would have to say that she saw the man.

But TS is adamant that her mom didn’t see the man.

And when her mom was asked, as I’m certain she was, she confirmed that. Where is that confirmation? In the same place as the statements from all those who were asked on those following days questions to which they answered they had nothing to say: it wasn’t registered.

So faced with an incontrovertible fact that it was impossible to replicate TS’s first sighting, what did Edgar decide to do?

Put the two on the right side of the street.

That way TS would be able to just walk by the 3.5 metres wide pathway, take a "peek" into it and be able to say with all reason, plausibility and simplicity that “the man seemed to be looking at the balcony of the ground floor apartment. He was wearing a black jacket leaning against the wall”, her exact words in the Mockumentary.

And pretend she didn't say the rest. Or at least no one is to mention she did, about this first sighting. Anything else can always be "excused" to have happened on the second sighting where she sees him completely unobstructed on the other side of the street.

That way, it’s clear because they showed and you saw it, that TS’s mom is completely oblivious to what her daughter says she saw.

This keeps the number of witnesses to one and only one.

This comes under that category that we keep warning you about: information presentation. Almost as important as the information itself, it's the way it's presented, if not even more important. Nowadays, information is basically "make believe". It's made up for you to believe, and you just have to believe in it.

The content? It either sells or it's convenient to those that it's convenient to please, otherwise it's nonexistent, even if it exists right before your commoner eyes.

It's the pinnacle of the Emperor's New Clothes, just before its climax. One has to wonders when will finally the child's voice be heard...   

This TS/TS’s mom episode is but another peculiarity existing in the Maddie Affair, which is a new version of that well known baby play “now I see you, now I don’t” whereupon one puts one’s hands in front of one’s eyes and pretends, to a baby's eyes, that by doing so one stops seeing reality.

In the Maddie Affair, it’s called “Now I see, now you don’t.” It consists of having two people, in the same time and place, where one sees all and the other sees absolutely nothing.

I know what you’re thinking. You think you’ve already seen Jane Tanner playing it with Gerry McCann and Jez Wilkins. No, they weren’t playing that game. They were playing "Know your place, Jane."

In Maddie’s “Now I see, now you don’t.” game, BOTH are in agreement. BOTH agree that one sees all and BOTH agree that the other sees nothing.

TS plays it with her mom. But there are more times when this game is played as you’ll see in a later post.

What’s the problem of having TS and mom on the right side of the street, instead of where it's said they are in the PJ Files? Hardly any. None in fact, if it weren't for bloggers like us.

If there’s something the BHs know for a fact it's that the vast majority of the population will never lay its eyes on the PJ Files.

Those who’ve actually just seen the files are but a speck of dust when compared to all those that saw the Mockumentary back in 2009, and start decreasing that number if you want to quantify those that actually have read them, or even parts of them.

It's the harsh reality, but one thing this blog is proud of NOT doing is to ignore reality, however harsh it may be.

So when Dave Edgar shows TS and her mom on the right hand side of the street BASED on the PJ Files, who’s to say otherwise? He could sell music sheets for bicycle parts that no one would know any better. Almost no one, that is.

Even if we go into the internet world of the “Maddie Affair”, where many abound to ensure that misinformation keeps being information, who’s to have said they noticed TS was on the wrong side of the street? Almost no one again.

We've said it, and it seems that no one noticed we did. Don't worry, we're not whining because we know those who matter did notice, so we're just speaking about the "mainstream" Maddie sites.

In the Maddie Affair, we have a similar phenomenon as with what is said about Caeser’s wife, who, we  remind you, not only has to be faithful but must also to appear to be, so many are the eyes that want to see  deceit.

In the Maddie Affair, for truth it's simply not sufficient to be true. It also must show repeatedly how truthful it really is, so many are the eyes that want to see deceit, and see that deceit remains deceiving and deceitful.

About TS being on the right side of the street it's important because it proves that there are at least two witnesses that LIE to make you to believe that there was a man in that pathway that day and hour.

TS, does so twice: in her statement in the PJ Files and by accepting the mockery made, by the changing of  street sides in the Mockumentary, of her own words.

Her mom does the same by being complicit and complacently silent to all.

And silence can say so much, can’t it?