Friday, 2 July 2010

What An Achievement!!

"Today CEOP can announce that between April 2009 and March 2010 we were directly involved in instigating and supporting investigations that safeguarded 278 children - double the number from the previous year"

278, that means 0,8 children a day rescued! 4 children every 5 days! And we haven't heard of ONE case in the news...

I do think the whole Country would rejoice and be so much grateful each time this happened.

Almost daily we would be able to go and buy our paper and gleefully read among all the depressing news, that a little boy or a little girl had been rescued, with the circumstances where, when, and how it happened.

The identity of the victim fully protected , of course… but the pedophile FULLY exposed!

278 victims, means 278 pedophiles, doesn’t it?

Remember reading about so many arrests lately? I don’t. But I don’t pay attention to anything lately…

Oh, it’s because the head of CEOP is camera shy, that must be it…

From 2008 to 2009, half of 278, makes 139.

That means, from 2008 until March this year, 417 victims freed and 417 pedophiles arrested.

That means 0,6 children a day rescued! 3 children every 5 days!

Please, somebody , have a heart and give these people a barrel full of medals!

With loads, and loads of them!

Next year… they’re going for the 500 figure, or even, if the pedophiles cooperate, 600!  

Thank you TC for the link!


  1. Bom dia Iron. e Text!

    Bom dia Todos/as BOA GENTE!

    Para completar este Vosso artigo ( preciso de escrever em português, como calculam e vou copiar e colar, também):

    " What gives the McCanns the right to ask students, paticularly schoolchildren, to divulge personal information before they can sign up to help find their daughter when they didn't even search for her themselves because it was too dark? "

    e copio , apenas um dos comentários pois todos os outros vão no mesmo sentido:

    " anon. - If my children were students right now, I'd be horrified if I learnt that they'd been handing over their personal details to the McCanns.

    CEOP, get your finger out!
    Do something about this! "

    What a shame all around unhappy Madeleine ! How can they (UK, some) use like that littlle Mad die ?


    Portanto eu não consigo acreditar nos tais salvamentos! Não acredito neles, os McTais.

  2. I'm really worried about the sanity of a Country who allows any citizen to "profit" from the misfortune of others. Paedophiles are disgusting and their victims suffer horrors then and for the reaminder of their lives. They need our respect and help. Tu use their pain for self-promotion is, for me, a far worse crime than that of a paedophile. Vultures feed on dead bodies, these people feed on violence done to children. Vile, vile, vile!!!

  3. What these people have achieved is the legitimate permission to access anybody's computer under the excuse of protecting children rom paedos.

    This crime is by all condemned so its very hard to fight those that knowing the violence of this crime, misuse the term.

    How can one go against someone fighting paedos? One can't. But one CAN fight those who pretend to be fighting paedos!

    I would like to congratulate this blog, its writers and its commentators, for seeing through evil, exposing it and not be afraid to tell off those who deserve to be told.

  4. Orwell is laughing his arse off

  5. Será que o anon das 08:16 é fan de I.D. e M. A. ?

    Ou está na verdade revoltado/a com o J.G. e respectiva companhia?

    Talvez esteja!

    Pois o que as Crianças apanhadas em tais redes, que não foi certamente o caso da Pequenina
    ( preferível, no meio de tanta desgraça)
    passam levam qualquer Pessoa normal à loucura e desespero.

    Também considero revoltante que os pais da Menina andem a querer arranjar dados privados dos jovens crédulos. É demasiadamente terrível, isso sim , são abutres mesmo! E, pior ainda, que J.G. e o CEOP permitam tal barbaridade.

    Elizabeth Aragoa.

  6. This blog has class and breeding...we cannot say the same for CEOP who have images of abused children on their walls for any member of the public to see.

    CEOP Mantra...everytime you look at an abused child that child is abused all over again.

    So WTF are CEOP doing???????

  7. totallyconfused3 Jul 2010, 14:31:00

    The amount of comments I have...well, there isn't enough time!

  8. Totally Confused3 Jul 2010, 16:50:00

    Gee..I found the time.

    1) Gamble's claim of 128 children saved in 'operation ore'- 3 of them were mine and I can prove it. (I have the FOI before he was CEOP and was SOCA- not FOI exempt) There was no evidence of my children being sexually assaulted/groomed/harmed/ even a slap/shouting for being rude.

    2)Get Gamble to define 'Saved' or 'Protected'- he can't define it.

    3)Gamble 'relies' on 'secrecy' about his SOCA/CEOP/ child protection/industry making....gee, isn't that what we are told to be careful of about our adult who wants to keep 'secrets..just between you and me..shhhh'.

    The man makes me want to be ill. I still maintain and am happy to say to his face: :Jimbo, you doth protest too much.

    TC rant #5047 done.

  9. Bravo,T.C. ! Do not shut up what You must and want to say!

    J.G. & company seems more like a children traffic group.


  10. "We know many students travel over the summer, take gap-year travel and also go places off the beaten path. We are launching a new initiative for students to help in the search for Madeleine".- WRONG!!!
    We know many parents travel over the summer with small kids. We are launching a new initiative for responsible parents for not leaving small children alone in the apartments because they may died from an unexpected accident specially if there is no adult around to help them in a moment of need! Have a nice holiday. Don't let them down! Keep your kids safe. Be a responsible parent.

  11. TC, you're absolutely right. And the key word is "safeguard", very commonly used in dictatorial regimes to guarantee the youth of that country won't be tempted to fall "off-track".

    Anon, "class and breeding" were two words very nice to have read. Thank you.

  12. Hello TC the more information you are able to reveal about our friend Jimbo the safer I shall feel.

    The very sad part is there are people who truly believed he was out there to help Madeleine.

    Still no release of what Mccann said at the CEOP meeting, nor ever likely to be.

  13. From the Times article Jim Gamble said this

    “Images of children being sexually abused should only be shared in strictly controlled circumstances. Any unnecessary retention leads to the re-victimisation of the child.”

    From a Telegraph Article dated 3.1.10 Brian Moore said this in his article

    When I left the building, I sat on a wall nearby and didn't move for half an hour. I thought about the many images I had seen and the courage of the people who dedicated their hours to preventing as many children becoming victims as possible.

    Now if that is not exploiting children I do not know what is. Yes by all means explain to Brian Moore what they find but to show him pictures is immoral those children have been exploited once it does not need Jim Gamble and his CEOP team to exploit them yet again.

  14. alextomo @mwilliamsthomas so please do not speculate onthis because lives cd b at stake and it is v direct and specific, believe me
    Not sure what is going on but reporter Alex has just given 'child abuse and Mccann defender' a rollocking on twitter...Mark never knows when to keep his big mouth shut...seems innocent people could get hurt by what he is spouting.

  15. Bren, that's such a pile of rubbish. That it's repeated by the same tired screen names every time doesn't make it true. Look at it woman, does he ever mention FACES???

    And TC, why are you so pally with the revolting Nigel Oldfield, proud possessor of 11,000 images of child porn, including category 5?? Why do the OBU people allow him to despoil their forum?
    What's really going on here? Anyone who wants to prove their innocence needs to stay away from unrepentant porn collectors like him. I can assure you that 11,000 images didn't get on his computer because of a friend, or a pop-up, or anything else. Neither was he caught by Ore, but because he took his hidden camera on a walkies around his local shopping centre, to play 'candid camera' with unsuspecting children.
    I know full well I will get flamed and insulted but I'm not bothered because it's time the REAL truth about the anti-CEOP agenda came out.


Comments are moderated.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.