It is not from the absence of a reasonable amount of warning, which we have given you as much as a reasonable person should but as you people do continue, even defiantly, to insist on the subject regardless, let’s continue as promised. We’re now making it a post.
Interesting how the same ‘crime’ –
alleged gender-impersonation – is “a vertically-challenged Portuguese
female impersonator” when it comes to the blog but is then only “people
who are basically minding their own business” when it comes to their
friends.
Like the Portuguese say, here, there are no children and then step-children. We are all children here. Let’s stop the hypocrisy once and for all.
We would like to add that we would never reveal a ‘do not publish’ comment - we’re only just expressing surprise at the change of attitude afterwards, completely contrary to the content of the comment
Oh, and we would also like to add a big thank you to them for clarifying something for us. All help and clarification is welcomed.
We would like to add that we would never reveal a ‘do not publish’ comment - we’re only just expressing surprise at the change of attitude afterwards, completely contrary to the content of the comment
Oh, and we would also like to add a big thank you to them for clarifying something for us. All help and clarification is welcomed.
Regardless of these meaningless distractions, we wish to continue to debate what is relevant to the case.
ReplyDeleteSo we are bringing over to this post the last comment on our previous one, regarding the Rat and Mark Perlin:
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1130165487097266177
DeleteIsmail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Replying to @IsmailARat5 @andyLUHGNW3427 and 34 others
Now...
Involve Perlin, and those results will not get inside a court.
They will be ruled inadmissable.
What he’s doing is spiking the process.
The PJ are wise to not even engage him.
The crafty lawyers for defence will pick everything apart.
6:37 PM - 19 May 2019
*****
We recommend that the Rat, the barking duck when it comes to Perlin, reads the following (our caps):
https://www.forensic-healthcare.com/newsletter5.pdf
Pages 6 and 7:
“Scientific Reliability
Scientific evidence must be sufficiently reliable for it to be admissible in court of law. Yet laboratory signals such as PCR-amplified DNA have natural variation. Mixtures and small DNA amounts exhibit even more pattern fluctuation. How can solid results be derived from inconstant data?
A first application of Bayes rule lets us infer genotypes solely from the data, representing genetic uncertainty with allele pair probability. A second Bayesian turn with the LR then com-pares these probabilistic genotypes with reference and population genotypes to calculate the change in identification information. Bayes done twice (drawing on considerable computing power) allows a thorough examination of STR data, and an objective determination of match strength.
A DNA match is expressed in a single statistic, the LR, whose logarithm (powers of 10) is a standard measure of information. A positive log(LR) supports inclusion, a negative value suggests exclusion, while numbers around zero are inconclusive.
The reliability of a scientific process is assessed through validation. With DNA mixtures, we want an interpretation method to be sensitive (include the contributors), specific (exclude non-contributors) and reproducible. Validation studies can measure these axes of DNA mixture information through log(LR) values calculated from genotype comparisons.
Cybergenetics and other groups have conducted many TrueAllele validation studies on DNA mixture interpretation. Two published peer-reviewed studies used DNA samples of known composition, while two other journal papers assessed casework items and compared with manual review. These studies have established that the system is sensitive (match statistics are a million times higher than some threshold methods), specific (false matches are rejected by factors of a billion billion) and reproducible.
Court Appearances
TrueAllele Casework was admitted into evidence in three homicide cases where there were defense challenges, ONE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM and two in the United States. In a US case, the Pennsylvania Superior and Supreme courts upheld the conviction and TrueAllele’s reliability, establishing a statewide precedent. The system was not admitted in a 2010 UK arson retrial where the judge had wanted more validation, although he “did not give a reasoned judgment explaining his decision.”
More TrueAllele validation studies were done, with regulatory approval granted by the New York State Commission on Forensic Science. A year and a half later, a voir dire was held in the Northern Ireland Massereene Bar-racks attack trial. In his ruling, the Honourable Mr. Justice Hart was satisfied that the system could be “regarded as being reliable and accepted” and admitted TrueAllele into evidence.
TrueAllele results have been reported in over a hundred criminal cases, most often for the prosecution. TrueAllele experts have testified in fifteen criminal trials, for offenses including murder, rape, child abduction, child molestation, bank robbery and terror. The system can separate out genotypes from mixtures of relatives. TrueAllele has helped lawyers defend innocent clients. The police use this computer interpretation to sharpen their DNA evidence, whether they need a more informative match statistic for a suspect in a crime, or they want to conduct a more effective DNA database search to solve a cold case.
(Cont)
(Cont)
DeleteGenotype Database
The original UK vision was to use the NDNAD to prevent crime through cold case DNA match by retiring criminals early in their careers. But DNA mixtures, and other challenging evidence, have dimmed the success of that mission. The NDNAD can only store simple single-source genotypes, with allowance for uncertain alleles. This late 20th century database was designed for pristine evidence and reference samples. The NDNAD cannot effectively represent today’s DNA mixtures, and so most of that hard-won taxpayer-funded evidence is not used for crime prevention.
A TrueAllele genotype database could help fulfill the original NDNDA goal. The system can resolve all DNA evidence, regardless of complexity or number of contributors, into its constituent genotypes. All genotypes can be uploaded to a national TrueAllele database. The high specificity of TrueAllele’s mathematical LR database match greatly reduces false hits. Its high sensitivity finds more cold hits that solve (and ultimately prevent) crime more effectively than existing government technology. A public-private partnership could use all of Britain’s DNA evidence in a national genotype database that would better prevent needless victimization.
Conclusion
DNA identifi cation began in the United Kingdom. For over two hundred years, Britain has been innovating the sci-ence that backs this forensic gold standard. By using only the most accurate interpretation methods, a nation can keep its wealth of DNA evidence from transmuting into fool’s gold.
Cybergenetics pioneering TrueAllele technology is an ac-cepted part of the DNA landscape. The FSS and Cellmark Forensic Services have genotyped millions of CJ sam-ples through TrueAllele computers. The Casework sys-tem has interpreted DNA evidence in UK criminal cases, with expert testimony given on reported matches. TrueAl-lele can help burnish the DNA gold standard, mathemati-cally preserving DNA evidence to fi nd the guilty, free the innocent and make the world a safer place. by Mark W. Perlin
*****
What the paper from 2013 states, which will alarm the Rat and all the hoax apologists about their car boot samples excuses being A’s sandals or any other explanation of nappies:
“The system can separate out genotypes from mixtures of relatives”
“The system can resolve all DNA evidence, regardless of complexity or number of contributors, into its constituent genotypes”
But it was only after 2009 that the system was ready to be used on criminal DNA evidence.
It seems that 2009 was the year Perlin’s methods could be used for criminal investigations and the FSS were well aware of his methods, as they were using TrueAllele themselves. So they could have had the samples re-tested.
Mark Perlin knew that in 2007 FSS samples could not be unravelled as in the quotes above, but it can be now!
The final outcome of the UK case indicated a need not just to determine whose DNA was found but also how it got there.
If Maddie’s DNA could be shown to be in the apartment and the car, it would take the case to another level and for Mark Perlin and ultimately the court, to determine how it got there.
Mark Perlin has stated he can determine if DNA was transferred, so we presume science has moved on since 2011.
Hopefully comment above will answer some of these questions:
Deletehttps://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1130168542219952129
Ismail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Replying to @all_i_wont @andyLUHGNW3427 and 34 others
Precisely...
15/20 is enough to convict in some places.
But would 20/20 be enough to convict in Portugal?
Portuguese law is hamstrung by having no principal crime to charge with... They have no body.
They have no witnesses to a body.
Does it really matter what DNA is
6:49 PM - 19 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1130169296158633984
Ismail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Replying to @IsmailARat5 @all_i_wont and 35 others
discovered where? If increasing from a 75% or 85% certainty to a 100% certainty doesn’t change the ability to prosecute then the 75 or 85% certainty is not a handicap.
Body or testimony.
Not fancy DNA tests.
Body or testimony
Anything that doesn’t contribute an iota to the
6:52 PM - 19 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1130169881159249920
Ismail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Replying to @IsmailARat5 @all_i_wont and 35 others
ability to prosecute is just trivia, circus, red herring.
Perlin is, allegedly, “an” expert.
Other more discreet experts are - sorry - have been available for years.
If the PJ felt they needed one, rest assured they would have one, a long time ago.
6:54 PM - 19 May 2019
*****
It seems that Mark Perlin is NOT allegedly, “an” expert but an expert.
The Rat agreeing that the alert from Keela is the proof that blood was found in 5A:
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/Angi80839247/status/1130466612077838337
Angi hayday @Angi80839247
Replying to @BourgeoisViews @IsmailARat5 and 47 others
Cerb blood is blood wet or dry,as a parent of a missing daughter and 2 highly skilled cadaver and blood dog alerted your apartment you would want to know the hows and why,why is this dog alerting to cadaver behind the sette,why is this blood dog alerting behind the settee!
2:33 PM - 20 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1130547035952877568
BourgeoisViews @BourgeoisViews
FollowFollow @BourgeoisViews
More
Replying to @Angi80839247 @IsmailARat5 and 47 others
No blood was confirmed to have been found in 5A. Why should the #McCann parents be worried about uncorroborated dog alerts? They don't prove anything.
4:04 PM - 20 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1130547035952877568
Ismail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Replying to @BourgeoisViews @Angi80839247 and 47 others
Except for that which was found by blood dog.
And the samples with a 75% match to the child which weren’t her semen or spinal fluid.
7:53 PM - 20 May 2019
Because when a duck stops barking and starts to quack, it should be listened to:
Deletehttps://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1130282269623635969
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @IsmailARat5 @Cerb32 and 47 others
https://www.eastidahonews.com/2016/07/private-investigator-issues-lengthy-report-deorr-kunz-case/
Arguably the best cadaver dog in the world alerted to dried blood from a living human on a buried towel...no human remains found in situ.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D6-RSPkWsAAQTnH.jpg
2:21 AM - 20 May 2019
[Picture attached says the following:
“Tracy Sargent’ Report of Findings
Investigator Sargent reports the “Chance” whom is a trained cadaver dog hit five different unknown targets. Chance is trained on human decomposition and human blood pathogen decomposition.
The following are the hits (limited) :
1. “Diaper Tree Area” – This is the area to which it was testified that “a diaper” was hung in the tree in the campground.
2. 139 Feet East of the Cattle Guard in the camp ground – in a loose ground area.
3. 10 Feet Due East of camp site.
4. 2.24 miles due Northeast of the 15 mp stake, in the ravine near 221 southeast fence.
5. Camp site ground .75 miles due East of the camp ground.
Area 1 : There was no evidence obtained.
Area 2 : Excavation was undertaken by LE and KIC – this area needs to be further exhumed and was turned over to Law Enforcement for further investigation by their team.
Area 3 : This area was excavated by hand – and found that a previous animal had been buried at this location. During the burial the subject who did the burial cut his hand and bled into a towel wrapped around the animal.
Area 4 : Investigators have turned this area over to law enforcement.
Area 5 : Investigators believe this site may have been a “holding site” for some type of human body.
There was no other evidence found.”
---------
The Frog highlighted this from the text above:
“Area 3 : This area was excavated by hand – and found that a previous animal had been buried at this location. During the burial the subject who did the burial cut his hand and bled into a towel wrapped around the animal.”]
*****
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1130402039425638400
Ismail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Replying to @FragrantFrog @Cerb32 and 47 others
And?
I’m “arguably” the best sniffer dog in the world. I can argue it. Doesn’t make it true.
And if you’re insinuating that a cadaver dog is only any good if it finds cadavers, then you’re madder than the brush you already get taken for.
All your post did was prove how
10:17 AM - 20 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1130402255839125505
Ismail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Replying to @IsmailARat5 @FragrantFrog and 48 others
effective cadaver dogs are.
#theydontmakefalsealertstheymakeaccurateones
10:17 AM - 20 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/BourgeoisViews/status/1130416660706406402
BourgeoisViews @BourgeoisViews
Replying to @IsmailARat5 @FragrantFrog and 47 others
Dogs do make false alerts where nothing has ever been for them to alert to. There's no way to know that an uncorroborated dog alert isn't a false alert.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2007/09/can-you-trust-a-cadaver-dog-if-there-s-no-cadaver.html
11:15 AM - 20 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/Angi80839247/status/1130466612077838337
Angi hayday @Angi80839247
Replying to @BourgeoisViews @IsmailARat5 and 47 others
Cerb blood is blood wet or dry,as a parent of a missing daughter and 2 highly skilled cadaver and blood dog alerted your apartment you would want to know the hows and why,why is this dog alerting to cadaver behind the sette,why is this blood dog alerting behind the settee!
2:33 PM - 20 May 2019
(Cont)
(Cont)
DeleteMichael @Michael80282175
Replying to @BourgeoisViews @Angi80839247 and 46 others
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7BOtPgWsAA6aXf.jpg
4:06 PM - 20 May 2019
[Picture attached says the following:
“People are missing the point,” Mr Grime countered in Maddie. “The dogs’ responses were confirmed by the recovery of DNA samples. Just because the analysis of thos samples did not provide conclusive results you just can’t trash what the dogs do”
This is followed by a picture of Colin Sutton with the following caption:
“Colin Sutton is a retired Metropolitan Police detective who caught serial killer Levi Belifield (Supplied)”]
*****
https://twitter.com/MrDelorean2/status/1130497611981631490
Mr Delorean @MrDelorean2
Replying to @Michael80282175 @BourgeoisViews and 47 others
Grime might claim that, but it isn’t a fact.
No-one has said the recovered DNA samples were blood. They may not even have been bodily fluid, as ‘cellular material’ includes epithelial cells.
So I’m afraid it’s not possible to say the samples corroborate the alerts.
#mccann
4:36 PM - 20 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/JaneParshally/status/1130523991939137537
Jane Marshall @JaneParshally
Replying to @MrDelorean2 @Michael80282175 and 48 others
And you are...?
Perhaps you would give an indication of your professional qualifications which justify the elevation of your opinion above that of Martin Grime?
#McCann
6:21 PM - 20 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/MrDelorean2/status/1130544844160548865
Mr Delorean @MrDelorean2
Replying to @JaneParshally @Michael80282175 and 48 others
🎶“Pleased to meet you. Hope you guessed my name.” 🎶😉
Nothing I’ve said is opinion, it’s fact.
And it’s all in the official PJ files.
#mccann
7:44 PM - 20 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1130548149964165121
Ismail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Replying to @MrDelorean2 @JaneParshally and 48 others
It isn’t, in fact.
Nothing asserts that the samples aren’t blood.
7:57 PM - 20 May 2019
*****
A post from the past, from the time ducks barked about dogs…
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2013/09/dna-is-dna.html
Interesting that the Rat is now talking about a locked/unlocked 5a door and children sleeping. Interesting too that his take on the dog evidence (cadaver odour and blood alerted to in 5a and Scenic, etc) has gone unchallenged by certain 'antis' (or 'pros'...?) -- even his assertion that the scientist, Perlin, is offering his services for rather dodgy reasons has been left, mostly, unchallenged by the usual rather vocal 'antis' on Twitter - those that stick the boot in or who go running to various blogs to whine. The Rat is going rogue and not one of them want to 'befriend' him.
ReplyDeletePlease compare this written in April:
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/dave81373133/status/1119966446107467776
dave @dave81373133
Replying to @LailaCaruso1 @saunokonoko
Despite what mark is claiming the evidence does not point to parental involvement... The dog alerts are not even admissable and finding maddies DNA would make no difference to that
3:09 PM - 21 Apr 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1120247143426609152
Ismail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Replying to @dave81373133 @LailaCaruso1 @saunokonoko
Bollocks.
No evidence points anywhere BUT parental involvement and the “dog alerts are inadmissable” is a meaningless statement.
Them being inadmissable is entirely unrelated to them being accurate.
One is a legal technicality. The other is a scientific fact.
Try again.
9:45 AM - 22 Apr 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1120247538949423106
Ismail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Replying to @IsmailARat5 @dave81373133 and 2 others
Finding the child’s DNA would be an entirely different matter, and would affirm that the dog alerts were as trustworthy as leading experts have always believed them to be
#youdontmakeacareeronforensicdogdeploymentifyouthinktheyreuseless
9:46 AM - 22 Apr 2019
*****
With this written in May:
“Does it really matter what DNA is discovered where? If increasing from a 75% or 85% certainty to a 100% certainty doesn’t change the ability to prosecute then the 75 or 85% certainty is not a handicap.
Body or testimony.
Not fancy DNA tests.
Body or testimony
Anything that doesn’t contribute an iota to the ability to prosecute is just trivia, circus, red herring.
Perlin is, allegedly, “an” expert.”
What in April, finding 100% match “would be an entirely different matter, and would affirm that the dog alerts were as trustworthy as leading experts have always believed them to be would” in May becomes “does it really matter what DNA is discovered where? If increasing from a 75% or 85% certainty to a 100% certainty doesn’t change the ability to prosecute then the 75 or 85% certainty is not a handicap”.
In April… looking forward to a 100% match. In May, nope, it matters not that much…
Ooops…
This basically encapsulates the Rat's tactics:
Delete- dogs good, really good, so good that he hasn't hesitated in throwing Mr Thompson and Sade Anslow under the bus to prove this point. What do dogs prove: blood and a cadaver (something that the Portuguese courts have already stated as proven... so why are people even discussing it?);
- Mark Perlin, bad, very bad, really bad. Why? Because Mark Perlin would prove whose blood and whose body and God forbid, the Rat does not want that. Doesn't want that at all;
- Only way to solve the case, ask for an impossibility: the body or a confession.
Is the Rat's tactics now clear?
He has to be really accurate and to the point about the dogs (and he is - which will end up with him proving what has already been proven, so no loss or gain) to gain the credibility that is needed to be taken seriously when dissing Mark Perlin.
It's like saying - all you idiots who hung on my every word on the dogs - now believe that the dogs' alerts are accurate BUT it doesn't matter, because:
Delete1. Perlin won't make a difference;
2. A body and/or a confession is ONLY what will solve the case.
Totally clear - and totally clear why the gang paid no attention to this Martian in the backyard, because they already KNEW he was coming.
DeleteThreat to our blog received and published on NotTextusa’s blog:
ReplyDelete“Anonymous22 May 2019 at 13:23
Mario is a very sick man. I'd imagine if he carries on with his warped trolling he'll have the table turned in spectacular fashion.”
****
This has evidently been reported.
If anything happens to any member of the blog or to any member of their families, we only ask that then people will have the decency not to say that it wasn’t ever meant to reach such seriousness, that it was never meant to get so out of hand.
To And to all those who have collaborated with this, and you know exactly who you are, we hope then you’ll be able to live with your consciences. When it mattered, you sided with this.
Would NotTextusa like to break cover and speak up in a public arena? Have we ever asked him to do that?
But one must ask why are those who are so concerned with this blog members’ gender and identity, are not showing similar concern when it comes to NotTextusa?
If they are ok with NotTextusa’s absolute anonymity, then does ours concern them so?
Mr Thompson says he knows who NotTextusa is. Why doesn’t he try to doxx him? Why does he accept NotTextusa’s anonymity without reservations?
NotTextusa won’t even give vague details about the branch of science he claims to be qualified in.
To be clear, all have every right to be anonymous or use whatever gender name they choose.
But apparently it’s one rule for them and another for this blog.
https://twitter.com/Anvil161Anvil16/status/1131185631504285696
ReplyDeleteWhispering @Anvil161Anvil16
#McCann #mccann #Mccann #mcCann THE RAT - exposed. None of the most purest antis could be bothered.
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2019/05/gender-correctness.html#comment-form
2:10 PM - 22 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/Jules1602xx/status/1131258764382937089
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @Jules1602xx
Replying to @Anvil161Anvil16
Has Tex, the short arsed spineless TWAT stopped pretending to be a woman now.. ?
'The gang knew he was coming' 🙄🤓
@IsmailARat5 points out some good facts about the #McCann case..
7:01 PM - 22 May 2019
*****
Jules,
- Trish Hills Allen
- Paul Rees
- Kirstie Murray
- Ben Thompson
- Natalie Charlesworth
- Netty Estelle
In the names above, is there a “short arsed spineless TWAT (...) pretending to be a woman”?
You know, like we do, there is. When are you going to doxx him?
https://twitter.com/Jules1602xx/status/1131328141421682695
Delete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @Jules1602xx
Replying to @FragrantFrog @Anvil161Anvil16 @IsmailARat5
I almost feel sorry for the little man.. He thinks we've doxxed him.. He has no idea he has a snake in his camp.. 🤐
11:37 PM - 22 May 2019
*****
Again, asking:
“- Trish Hills Allen
- Paul Rees
- Kirstie Murray
- Ben Thompson
- Natalie Charlesworth
- Netty Estelle
In the names above, is there a “short arsed spineless TWAT (...) pretending to be a woman”?
You know, like we do, there is. When are you going to doxx him?”
And we’re not talking about the beholder of the MichaelBWanker twitter account, you know, the one who comments as “Cat” on NotTextusa’s blog. We’re not talking about that gender-fake person. We’re talking about the other gender-fake one, the one you have described as a “short arsed spineless TWAT (...) pretending to be a woman”.
Are you going to do like you did with the pictures of the BRT you said you had and produce nothing?
Post Scriptum:
By the way, you people should educate yourselves. Understand what a heteronym is. Was ever Fernando Pessoa called a short-arsed spineless twat for being Ricardo Reis? And if he was ever called that, would that say more about Pessoa or about the person who would have called him a short-arsed spineless twat?
Let us exemplify:
MichaelBWanker is a heteronym, evidently, it’s absolutely anonymous in terms of identity and gender as no one is STUPID enough to think that there is a real Michael B Wanker behind that account.
And if they are STUPID enough to believe that there was a real Michael B Wanker and then bluster and babble about having been fooled by an evident heteronym, then they are just confirming they are… STUPID. Calling out a heteronym for being fake is like running back to mummy to warn her that the sea is filled with water. Understandable in a child, rather ridiculous when one is an adult.
On the other hand, Trish Hills Allen, Paul Rees, Kirstie Murray, Ben Thompson, Natalie Charlesworth and Netty Estelle are not heteronyms. They pretend to be real people. In truth, 4 of them as far as we know at the moment, are just that. Real people.
See the difference?
If you prefer to continue to look stupid and ridiculous, by all means continue. The more you people speak the more you reveal, the more informed we are as information in its liquid form is a fluorescent liquid.
To our critics and gender-worriers,
DeleteTo be clear: Textusa is a woman, who in 2008 was in her 80s – if the truth of case isn’t freed, she’s bound to become the eldest living fictional character on the planet – has been divorced twice and is happily married, as readers know, to Fred, a very patient and passionate man; has an undisclosed number of children, an undisclosed number of grandchildren and more recently has been blessed with an undisclosed number of great-grandchildren.
Who are the people behind Textusa? It’s no one’s business.
If your mind cannot grasp this, we suggest you ask for a refund from wherever you got your mind from.
Unpublished Anonymous at 22 May 2019, 20:57:00,
ReplyDeleteWe doubt you have the qualifications to form an such an opinion. Spelling and grammar, however, is much improved. Well done.
https://mobile.twitter.com/saunokonoko/status/1128929135198212097
ReplyDeleteI listened to what Laura Richardson said.
She met DCI Andy Redwood on the day he got the case (OG) at a function. He saw she had a copy of K’s book in her bag. He said he’d just been tasked with heading up that investigation and when Laura asked him about the case. he said the “McCanns had nothing to do with it”
This caused Laura immediate concern. At the start of an investigation all lines should be considered.
Similarly - Redwood went to Ireland to promote the McCann case and promised all BBC footage to the production company who produced a real life crime programme for RTE (Irish Television). I know for a fact that Redwood adopted the stance that the parents had nothing to do with M's disappearance. It was emphatic and quite startling.
DeleteI was hoping to listen to Isabelle McFadden’s Sunday podcast about Mark Saunokonoko’s podcasts but she’s delayed the recording.
DeleteI think she’s on a road trip with her friend at the moment, so maybe she’ll do it when she gets back.
Anonymous 23 May 2019, 10:58:00,
DeleteWhatever Isabelle McFadden does in her life unrelated to the case, is no one's business, nor we are seeing it being relevant to the case.
Konwing McFadden's personality, if she is travelling she will certainly be posting photos of that.
We have published your comment because we consider relevant to our readers, the information about the postponement of the podcast.
But it is related to the case.
DeleteLet’s play a little game and elect the best joke lately.
ReplyDeleteJoke #1:
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturnz/status/1130938718322401281
⚡Bugsy ⚡ @TheBunnyReturnz
Replying to @Cerb32 @may_shazzy and 29 others
FatherJack was as sharp as a razor, which was probably why she has very little time for Sherlock. Our Syn used to make mincemeat of Sara's lies about the dogs - same as I do with text. TrulyJudy kept reincarnating herself on here, but is more into crystal gazing these days.
9:49 PM - 21 May 2019
Joke #2:
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1130528834607042560
Ismail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Replying to @bitconfused90 @PollyGraph69 and 35 others
I’m as “genuine”, or rather “authentic” as it comes.
6:40 PM - 20 May 2019
If the reader elected any of the above, the reader is wrong. This is the best joke we’ve read lately:
https://twitter.com/Ntown1976Nick/status/1130802563346042881
nick Townsend @Ntown1976Nick
Replying to @andyLUHGNW3427 @MancunianMEDlC and 47 others
From reading the files properly. From realising the physical impossibility of the (various) crimes of which they are accused.
12:48 PM - 21 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/Ntown1976Nick/status/1130803019686305792
nick Townsend @Ntown1976Nick
FollowFollow @Ntown1976Nick
Replying to @Ntown1976Nick @andyLUHGNW3427 and 48 others
The non involvement of the arguidos parents of Madeleine in any penally relevant action seems to result from the objective circumstances of them not being inside the apartment when she disappeared, from the normal behaviour that they adopted until said disappearance and (more)
12:50 PM - 21 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1131219968635396105
Ismail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Replying to @Ntown1976Nick @andyLUHGNW3427 and 46 others
Incorrect.
The arguido release script is tongue in cheek. It’s sarcasm.
No body and no eyewitness testimony means no determining what crime to prosecute.
Them not being present in the apartment at the time is simply their narrative, neither proven nor disproven, but ridiculous
4:27 PM - 22 May 2019
*****
The Rat talking to Santa Claus… sorry, wrong fictional character, Nick Townsend!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
On a serious note, do note how the Rat pushes that without a body, there can’t be a prosecution: “No body and no eyewitness testimony means no determining what crime to prosecute.”
We have already given the example that proves him wrong: Joana Cipriano.
See what he’s really saying? More than dissing Perlin – which he is – he’s shouting out loud: archive the damn case!
Anonymous 23 May 2019, 13:03:00,
ReplyDeleteAre you even familiar with the case? Or you do you just write before you think?
One of the reasons the Portuguese justice system doesn’t condemn based on confessions is this:
https://sic.pt/Programas/linha-aberta-com-hernani-carvalho/videos/2019-04-03-Joao-Cipriano-revela-que-confessou-o-crime-de-homicidio-a-base-da-porrada
https://sic.pt/Programas/linha-aberta-com-hernani-carvalho/videos/2019-03-04-Entrevista-exclusiva-a-Leonor-Cipriano-Continua-a-dizer-que-esta-inocente.e-acredita-que-a-Joana-continua-viva
https://www.impala.pt/noticias/atualidade/joao-cipriano-sai-prisao/
https://observador.pt/2019/02/07/leonor-cipriano-saiu-a-liberdade-esta-quinta-feira/
To make certain that when those who confessed later “changed” their minds, and started to say they confessed under pressure/torture, no one would take them seriously because everyone knows that it is not like that the system works.
Some NOT good news for some:
ReplyDeletehttps://pinerivertimes.com/articles/101902-judge-allows-dog-sniffing-evidence-at-redwine-trial-for-now
Judge allows dog sniffing evidence at Redwine trial, for now
Defense attorneys can present evidence refuting science of cadaver canines
By Bret Hauff Herald Staff Writer
Wednesday, May 22, 2019 2:16 PM
A judge overseeing the trial of Mark Redwine, a Vallecito man accused of killing his 13-year-old son, Dylan, upheld a decision this week to allow evidence obtained by sniffing dogs at trial, despite the defense’s argument that such evidence is unscientific and unreliable.
Evidence obtained by canines and their handlers trained to detect human remains may be presented as factual, expert testimony at a four-week September trial where prosecutors will work to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Redwine killed his son in November 2012. Attorneys working on the Redwine trial are barred from speaking about the case by court order.
Sixth Judicial District Court Judge Jeffery Wilson said in an order Monday that the defense’s latest attempt to exclude cadaver dog evidence did not convince him to change an order he’d already issued citing a Colorado Supreme Court case where justices admitted evidence obtained by canines and their handlers as expert testimony.
Wilson said in his order that he will allow the defense team to present further arguments and evidence at an upcoming motions hearing about why cadaver dog evidence shouldn’t be allowed at trial. Public defenders previously submitted a 39-page motion, written by The Innocence Project and signed by defense attorney John Moran, arguing that evidence obtained by cadaver dogs does not rise to the reliability required by the court for scientific evidence.
Prosecutors, in part, hinge their case on the fact that cadaver dogs “indicated that a deceased person had been in (Redwine’s) living room and bed of his pickup truck ...,” according to the indictment.
“What is at issue is what has never been proven with any degree of scientific reliability: the ability of a dog to detect the residual scent of a particular object, including human remains, at a specific location days, weeks, months or even more than a year after that object was removed,” The Innocence Project wrote in its motion signed by Moran. “Yet, that is precisely the speculative theory upon which the state seeks to base its case against Mr. Redwine.”
Dylan Redwine disappeared from his father’s home in November 2012 in Vallecito. His partial remains were found in June 2013 on Middle Mountain. His death was ruled a homicide.
Mark Redwine has maintained his innocence ever since. He has been charged with second-degree murder and child abuse resulting in death. If convicted, he could face 16 to 48 years in prison.
bhauff@durangoherald.com
https://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/crime/fbi-profiler-helped-in-arrest-of-dylan-redwine-father
DeleteDylan Redwine's brother details 'disgusting' photos they saw of father; profiler helped detectives
Pete Klismet: "No doubt" Mark Redwine killed son
Posted: 5:30 PM, Jul 24, 2017
Updated: 5:33 AM, Jul 25, 2017
By: Jaclyn Allen
FORT COLLINS, Colo. -- A former FBI profiler who reviewed the Dylan Redwine murder investigation helped lead police to arrest the 13-year-old's father, and the boy’s brother says they saw lewd photos of their father involved in bizarre acts before Dylan went missing.
Mark Redwine was arrested Saturday in Washington state on felony charges of second-degree murder and child abuse resulting in death. He will remain held on a $1 million bail in Washington while he awaits an Aug. 17 extradition hearing, a judge in Bellingham, Washington determined Monday.
He will fight extradition back to Colorado, however, Denver7 has learned.
"We're talking about a guy that's probably a registered psychopath narcissist," said Pete Klismet, a criminal profiling consultant and author who is now writing a textbook on violent crime. "He thinks he is smarter than everyone else."
La Plata County investigators hired Klismet in 2015 to review the evidence in the disappearance and murder of Dylan Redwine, which Klismet said he knew little about before the request.
After months of poring over the case, he had a clear answer.
"I simply wanted to look at everything I could look at, and try to figure out who did this. And it was an inescapable conclusion that it was Mark," said Klismet, who declined to talk about the specifics of the evidence.
However, an indictment states that investigators found Dylan Redwine's blood in his father's living room. A cadaver dog alerted in the same room and in Mark Redwine's truck, according to the indictment.
Cory Redwine saw "disgusting" photos of dad in lewd situations
The indictment also said that Dylan Redwine and his older brother, Cory Redwine, had seen compromising photos of their father and that Dylan planned to confront him about them.
Family members said they believe this may have been what set off Mark Redwine's temper.
"I have seen the photos," said Cory Redwine. "It shows him wearing women's clothes and makeup and a diaper and then eating his feces from the diaper. It was disgusting. We couldn't believe it."
If that provoked Mark Redwine into a rage, Klismet said, more details may come out in court, but he said he is certain Mark will not plead guilty.
I believe they've got a strong case," said Klismet. "There is no question in my mind that this case will go to trial. Mark will not plead guilty because he's a narcissist. He believes he can lie his way out of everything."
Klismet said that Mark Redwine's version of what happened—that Dylan was somehow kidnapped—has a mathematical likelihood of close to zero.
Cory Redwine discussed the case further Monday afternoon with Denver7, and said he was happy his brother was finally getting justice.
“It’s exciting to know that justice is coming for my little brother,” said Cory Redwine, who called the arrest “bittersweet.”
“I’m obviously excited. I believe they have the right man, but it’s still sad that we even have to go through this,” he added.
(Cont)
(Cont)
DeleteFrom the beginning, Cory says he suspected his father was involved in Dylan’s disappearance.
“We didn’t know what the outcome would be, but we’ve always known that Mark was in some way, shape or form involved in this,” he told Denver7.
He said the photos were “disturbing”, but that they were likely just the beginning of the confrontation between his brother and his father, who Cory says had a violent temper.
“I think Dylan had a lot more than just pictures that he wanted to get across to Mark,” said Cory, who said he believes his father may be mentally ill. “He’s just a sick person, but he’s fully aware of his actions, and he’s fine with being that person. If that’s how he wants to live his life, then well, we can see where that gets you. He’s where he belongs.”
“However, an indictment states that investigators found Dylan Redwine's blood in his father's living room. A cadaver dog alerted in the same room and in Mark Redwine's truck, according to the indictment.”
DeleteBlood was also present at the scene where cadaver dog alerted. Does this mean the cadaver dog was confused by the blood? Of course not.
The judge has agreed to accept dogs’ findings by the prosecution.
We inform readers that having understood the EVRD dog v blood alerts, it is a very, very, VERY INTERESTING subject. A very fascinating one.
Unpublished Anonymous at 23 May 2019, 16:55:00,
ReplyDeleteAre you really angry or just pretending that you are to please us?
You have to make up your mind. Either the Portuguese justice system is so archaic, so primitive, that it sentences people based on confessions beaten out of them, so, one would expect will accept any kind of evidence just to have the pleasure to convict or it’s a Justice system so absurd that it won’t accept scientific data (which other courts have accepted) from a scientist because an unbiased offer was made public and because some lonesome tweeter decided it was a media circus.
Which Justice system is the Portuguese one? Our answer: neither.
Unpublished Anonymous at 23 May 2019, 16:24:00
ReplyDeleteWe have thought thoroughly about the theory we defend in this blog. As you will certainly understand, this is not the space to promote other theories.
https://twitter.com/factsonly10x/status/1131560910248730624
ReplyDeleteCrimes Unsolved @factsonly10x
Replying to @Millsyj73 @Babs108164110 @ZaneZeleti
More abuse. You #mccann haters are just full of bile. Who hurt you? #mccanns
3:01 PM - 23 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1129497170925772805
Ismail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Who hurt you as a child, that you don’t understand sarcasm?
10:21 PM - 17 May 2019
******
How interesting. Just saying.
https://twitter.com/PollyGraph69/status/1131631898915160064
ReplyDeleteDebbie Lee Perry @PollyGraph69
Replying to @leetronix
The ocean club P.D.L Portugal May 2007.
but not everyone there was swinging.
remember its kept secret, hence no phones or family photos of madeleine # mccann s holiday, and all the deleted calls.
7:44 PM - 23 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/Esjabe1/status/1131633210700517378
💙 єѕנαвє 💛 @Esjabe1
Replying to @PollyGraph69 @leetronix
You know that’s a joke theory, right? It was made up to prove some people will believe anything & to expose some others deviant proclivities. 😂
Which joke are you? 😂
7:49 PM - 23 May 2019
*****
First, there was no swinging.
Then there was gay swinging.
Now, swinging was invented. On purpose. As a joke. Just to see who fell for it.
Oh, and to expose swinging is “to expose some others deviant proclivities”? There, we fully agree.
This is how much a confession is worth to the prosecution in Portugal:
ReplyDeletehttps://e-justice.europa.eu/content_rights_of_defendants_in_criminal_proceedings_-169-PT-maximizeMS-en.do?clang=en&idSubpage=2
“Can I plead guilty to all or some of the charges before the trial?
You can admit the facts to the Examining Magistrate, but if you choose to remain silent in court, that confession will not be valid.”
Meaning, even if the McCanns confessed to whatever they are accountable for, IF confession had any value for the prosecution (which it doesn’t), it would come down to risking in what mood they would be on the day of the trial.
As we have explained, the confession serves to help consolidate the evidence. Meaning that on the day of the trial, the evidence has to be consolidated without needing the confession. In court, the confession has only one use and that is to mitigate the sentence and that depends exclusively on the judge, or collective of judges, to take it on board or not.
To say that the Maddie case will be solved with a confession is to be intentionally misleading. Either in that confession they present evidence that will bind them to guilt, or them confessing or not is irrelevant.
To illustrate. Let’s imagine that with the evidence as is, the McCanns decide to confess and say out loud, yes, yes, the blood found was Maddie’s both in the apartment and Scenic.
The prosecution then would decide to advance with charges just based on this confession. In court the prosecution would say, it is Maddie’s blood as the defendants have confessed… to be interrupted by the defense asking where and when the defendants confessed because as far as they were concerned that never happened, and if it did, was under coercive circumstances.
At that moment the evidence would be the same as it was before the confession.
All hypothetical and ridiculous and only to prove a point. And to show how idiotic such a claim is.
https://news.sky.com/story/live-d-day-for-may-after-brexit-plan-revolt-11727415
ReplyDeletehttps://www.bbc.com/news/live/uk-politics-48394091
https://www.itv.com/news/2019-05-24/theresa-may-to-resign-as-conservative-leader-on-june-7/