Unless something happens before June 7, another British Prime-Minister folds on the Maddie case.
We are obviously disappointed. As our readers know, we have expressed the opinion that the outing of the truth about what happened to Maddie was a personal issue to Theresa May.
She gave us positive signs from the start. Stood up and “invited” Jim Gamble to resign in 2010.
From 2013, and we’re talking exclusively about the case, the truth slowly but steadily broke ground. If the people from then travelled in time to today, they wouldn’t believe what is allowed to be said publicly, most importantly, in the media about the case.
But even to someone to whom the case was personal, she didn’t out the truth. We don’t know if she really wasn’t able to or if, after her certain point in time used the case as leverage to her political ambitions. Only she will know that.
Our hope is that the public opinion is by now so convinced of a cover-up that archiving the case will be a bigger embarrassment to the nation than it is to reveal the truth.
Time will tell.
We are obviously disappointed. As our readers know, we have expressed the opinion that the outing of the truth about what happened to Maddie was a personal issue to Theresa May.
She gave us positive signs from the start. Stood up and “invited” Jim Gamble to resign in 2010.
From 2013, and we’re talking exclusively about the case, the truth slowly but steadily broke ground. If the people from then travelled in time to today, they wouldn’t believe what is allowed to be said publicly, most importantly, in the media about the case.
But even to someone to whom the case was personal, she didn’t out the truth. We don’t know if she really wasn’t able to or if, after her certain point in time used the case as leverage to her political ambitions. Only she will know that.
Our hope is that the public opinion is by now so convinced of a cover-up that archiving the case will be a bigger embarrassment to the nation than it is to reveal the truth.
Time will tell.
It'll be some coincidence or maybe not if Grange were to fold in the next few months.If 12 months granting as been approved, with the likelihood of another government in power by next year,Grange maybe has 10 more months at best.
ReplyDeleteH
From "FB Anon #2":
ReplyDelete"Should be interesting as they’ve been in overdrive trying to get OG shut down using the fury of the public. I do wonder if the request for a years funding was from the government to tell them to shut up, or from the anti’s who try whipping the public into a frenzy over wasting money."
From "FB Anon #2":
ReplyDelete"I see Ben Thompson has been dissing the dogs again this week, he’s been putting his point across that he doesn’t believe Maddie’s body was ever in the car and the only blood that was found and signalled for by the dogs was Gerry’s. So it seems the dogs could only alert correctly if the blood wasn’t Maddie’s, as the they’re still pushing the Fss garble that it wasn’t confined to be blood found in the boot. If brains were gun powder it wouldn’t blow their hats off, as either the dogs were right or wrong. Dogs don’t select the kind of blood they want to find, but I’m sure the irony is lost on them of what they are promoting, the dogs are correct as long as the blood is not Maddie’s. I’ve seen it twice now where they insists the blood is either Gerry’s in the car or the police officers who cut himself while lifting the tiles in 5a. Funny how dogs can discriminate against a dead victim but can find blood of the living. They really do make themselves look like fools, but it annoys me they are misleading their followers."
We feel best to bring over this comment from our previous post, together with it's respective replies:
ReplyDelete"Textusa23 May 2019, 16:11:00
Some NOT good news for some:
https://pinerivertimes.com/articles/101902-judge-allows-dog-sniffing-evidence-at-redwine-trial-for-now
Judge allows dog sniffing evidence at Redwine trial, for now
Defense attorneys can present evidence refuting science of cadaver canines
By Bret Hauff Herald Staff Writer
Wednesday, May 22, 2019 2:16 PM
A judge overseeing the trial of Mark Redwine, a Vallecito man accused of killing his 13-year-old son, Dylan, upheld a decision this week to allow evidence obtained by sniffing dogs at trial, despite the defense’s argument that such evidence is unscientific and unreliable.
Evidence obtained by canines and their handlers trained to detect human remains may be presented as factual, expert testimony at a four-week September trial where prosecutors will work to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Redwine killed his son in November 2012. Attorneys working on the Redwine trial are barred from speaking about the case by court order.
Sixth Judicial District Court Judge Jeffery Wilson said in an order Monday that the defense’s latest attempt to exclude cadaver dog evidence did not convince him to change an order he’d already issued citing a Colorado Supreme Court case where justices admitted evidence obtained by canines and their handlers as expert testimony.
Wilson said in his order that he will allow the defense team to present further arguments and evidence at an upcoming motions hearing about why cadaver dog evidence shouldn’t be allowed at trial. Public defenders previously submitted a 39-page motion, written by The Innocence Project and signed by defense attorney John Moran, arguing that evidence obtained by cadaver dogs does not rise to the reliability required by the court for scientific evidence.
Prosecutors, in part, hinge their case on the fact that cadaver dogs “indicated that a deceased person had been in (Redwine’s) living room and bed of his pickup truck ...,” according to the indictment.
“What is at issue is what has never been proven with any degree of scientific reliability: the ability of a dog to detect the residual scent of a particular object, including human remains, at a specific location days, weeks, months or even more than a year after that object was removed,” The Innocence Project wrote in its motion signed by Moran. “Yet, that is precisely the speculative theory upon which the state seeks to base its case against Mr. Redwine.”
Dylan Redwine disappeared from his father’s home in November 2012 in Vallecito. His partial remains were found in June 2013 on Middle Mountain. His death was ruled a homicide.
Mark Redwine has maintained his innocence ever since. He has been charged with second-degree murder and child abuse resulting in death. If convicted, he could face 16 to 48 years in prison.
bhauff@durangoherald.com"
https://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/crime/fbi-profiler-helped-in-arrest-of-dylan-redwine-father
DeleteDylan Redwine's brother details 'disgusting' photos they saw of father; profiler helped detectives
Pete Klismet: "No doubt" Mark Redwine killed son
Posted: 5:30 PM, Jul 24, 2017
Updated: 5:33 AM, Jul 25, 2017
By: Jaclyn Allen
FORT COLLINS, Colo. -- A former FBI profiler who reviewed the Dylan Redwine murder investigation helped lead police to arrest the 13-year-old's father, and the boy’s brother says they saw lewd photos of their father involved in bizarre acts before Dylan went missing.
Mark Redwine was arrested Saturday in Washington state on felony charges of second-degree murder and child abuse resulting in death. He will remain held on a $1 million bail in Washington while he awaits an Aug. 17 extradition hearing, a judge in Bellingham, Washington determined Monday.
He will fight extradition back to Colorado, however, Denver7 has learned.
"We're talking about a guy that's probably a registered psychopath narcissist," said Pete Klismet, a criminal profiling consultant and author who is now writing a textbook on violent crime. "He thinks he is smarter than everyone else."
La Plata County investigators hired Klismet in 2015 to review the evidence in the disappearance and murder of Dylan Redwine, which Klismet said he knew little about before the request.
After months of poring over the case, he had a clear answer.
"I simply wanted to look at everything I could look at, and try to figure out who did this. And it was an inescapable conclusion that it was Mark," said Klismet, who declined to talk about the specifics of the evidence.
However, an indictment states that investigators found Dylan Redwine's blood in his father's living room. A cadaver dog alerted in the same room and in Mark Redwine's truck, according to the indictment.
Cory Redwine saw "disgusting" photos of dad in lewd situations
The indictment also said that Dylan Redwine and his older brother, Cory Redwine, had seen compromising photos of their father and that Dylan planned to confront him about them.
Family members said they believe this may have been what set off Mark Redwine's temper.
"I have seen the photos," said Cory Redwine. "It shows him wearing women's clothes and makeup and a diaper and then eating his feces from the diaper. It was disgusting. We couldn't believe it."
If that provoked Mark Redwine into a rage, Klismet said, more details may come out in court, but he said he is certain Mark will not plead guilty.
I believe they've got a strong case," said Klismet. "There is no question in my mind that this case will go to trial. Mark will not plead guilty because he's a narcissist. He believes he can lie his way out of everything."
Klismet said that Mark Redwine's version of what happened—that Dylan was somehow kidnapped—has a mathematical likelihood of close to zero.
Cory Redwine discussed the case further Monday afternoon with Denver7, and said he was happy his brother was finally getting justice.
“It’s exciting to know that justice is coming for my little brother,” said Cory Redwine, who called the arrest “bittersweet.”
“I’m obviously excited. I believe they have the right man, but it’s still sad that we even have to go through this,” he added.
(Cont)
(Cont)
DeleteFrom the beginning, Cory says he suspected his father was involved in Dylan’s disappearance.
“We didn’t know what the outcome would be, but we’ve always known that Mark was in some way, shape or form involved in this,” he told Denver7.
He said the photos were “disturbing”, but that they were likely just the beginning of the confrontation between his brother and his father, who Cory says had a violent temper.
“I think Dylan had a lot more than just pictures that he wanted to get across to Mark,” said Cory, who said he believes his father may be mentally ill. “He’s just a sick person, but he’s fully aware of his actions, and he’s fine with being that person. If that’s how he wants to live his life, then well, we can see where that gets you. He’s where he belongs.”
“However, an indictment states that investigators found Dylan Redwine's blood in his father's living room. A cadaver dog alerted in the same room and in Mark Redwine's truck, according to the indictment.”
DeleteBlood was also present at the scene where cadaver dog alerted. Does this mean the cadaver dog was confused by the blood? Of course not.
The judge has agreed to accept dogs’ findings by the prosecution.
We inform readers that having understood the EVRD dog v blood alerts, it is a very, very, VERY INTERESTING subject. A very fascinating one.
Unpublished comment on this subject and which we have censored the absolutely unnecessary but intentionally off-putting insulting remark:
Delete“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Gender-correctness":
"The judge has agreed to accept dogs’ findings by the prosecution"
No he hasn't. He has agreed that the evidence can be put to the jury. He also said "that he will allow the defense team to present further arguments and evidence at an upcoming motions hearing about why cadaver dog evidence shouldn’t be allowed at trial"
So he has found in favour of the prosecution who applied to use the evidence, but is allowing the defence to argue that they shouldn't.
That's in the article you posted – (censored)
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 23 May 2019, 23:06:00”
*****
Anonymous at 23 May 2019, 23:06:00,
We should have been more accurate and said “the dogs’ findings to be admitted as evidence, as requested by the prosecution”.
Hope you are happy now, as very clearly you are not happy about what you read in the article. Not difficult to see on which side of the fence you are: a pro or a so-called anti.
And we wait to see the final outcome of the court decision. It will be interesting to see what the defense will present to say the EVRD dog’s are not reliable.
J'avais beaucoup d'espoir en T. May. For the truth, for Madeleine.
ReplyDeleteJ'aimais beaucoup Fred. Je relis souvent les posts de cette époque.
DeleteThank you, Textusa.
Unpublished Anonymous at 24 May 2019, 19:34:00,
ReplyDeleteAs we expect you expected, we can’t publish your comment for various reasons and the most important one is that we do not put out private information about our critics, regardless of how loathsome we find them. And those who make public private information are loathsome, deserving only contempt.
There is one exception, a rule which we don’t follow, and that when a doxxer doxxes then s/he forfeits the right to his/her own privacy. For example, when a doxxer puts out screengrabs of private convos without authorisation, s/he is implicitly authorising, in self-defense or to contradict, that private convos where s/he is involved be made public. We don’t follow that rule but understand that others may.
One of the reasons we find Mr Thompson absolutely loathsome – the person targeted in your comment – is exactly because he’s a frequent doxxer and we’re not, by far, his only victims, the most ironic being the doxxing of his friends because he often likes to involve then in his personal squabbles when cornered. Many a friend (?) of his has found him or herself in this situation.
We find Mr Thompson loathsome but would never publish anything public about his private life. However sordid the details may be.
Another reason for not publishing your comment is because of information being like a fluorescent liquid.
If we published your comment, the details it has would allow more attentive eyes to be able to follow the trail back to you (whoever you are) and your possible sources (if they exist, and if they don’t that would mean you are in direct contact with Mr Thompson).
Basically, they would do what we do. We look at the info said about us and analyse of how that person got that information, information that can be wrong or right. Saying something that is not true – whilst thinking it is – releases as much information as what is said that is true. Both leave a trail to follow.
Following these trails, one can then interconnect the people behind them and how they relate with each other. The biggest irony of all is that in practical terms, those who are thinking they are doxxing us are in fact doxxing themselves, their friends and the friends of their friends. A doxxer is a fascinating source which gives so much relevant information, none of which is the content of the doxxing, as when it is about us, it’s irrelevant.
About the content of your comment. Of the list, we only didn’t know about the first. The rest we did. However, we must confess not with the detail you have mentioned.
Has the public a right to know these things about Mr Thompson? As said, there we disagree with you totally, strongly and absolutely. What is private is to remain private. Just because the devil sins, that doesn’t justify us sinning as well. We have self-respect.
''As we expect you expected, we can’t publish your comment for various reasons and the most important one is that we do not put out private information about our critics, regardless of how loathsome we find them. And those who make public private information are loathsome, deserving only contempt.''
ReplyDeleteBut you devoted an entire post to a threat to doxx perfect strangers in order to 'punish' those who brought up the matter of you pretending to be a woman.
What a vast hypocrite you are
NotTextusa,
DeleteWe have not threatened threaten to out anyone. We have just challenged you, Mr Thompson, Jules Chrimes and Sade Anslow to do it if you all are going to be consistent.
What do you think caused the gradual emergence of 'the truth' 2013 onwards? Politics? The beginning of the Cameron-Clegg coalition?
ReplyDeletesv
Unpublished Mr Thompson at 25 May 2019, 15:17:00,
ReplyDeleteWe are only replying because in your comment you say “There is nothing sordid in my past (…) So don't project the word "sordid" onto me” and that needs total clarification.
We have not accused you of having a sordid past. What is factual is that we have had people telling us sordid things about you. We don’t think you will be surprised if we say that you have made many enemies, people who don’t like you.
Many are not your open enemies. You scare people and they will do their best to avoid falling in your cross-hairs but seem to appreciate the way we stand up to your bullying, so they tell us things.
Like it’s likely that people who don’t like us will tell you unpleasant things about us which are not true, we apply a filter to what we are told. We evaluate the anger. The more the person hates you, the less reliable is what they say. We are certain you apply the same kind of filter to what is said about us to you.
What we conclude to be true, is only up to us to know.
But back to the point, what we have said in our comment is that we have been told very sordid things but we are NOT accusing you of having a sordid past. That is the business between you, the people who accuse you and the British justice system in the cases involved, if it is even involved in any case.
And what we said in the comment is that we won’t echo anything that we were told. We won’t say what we have been told about you that is even worse than sordid; that is creepy/sociopathic, absolutely mind bogglingly abhorrent, however “slack” or “colourful” the source may be.
About the rest of your comment, it shows your biggest quality which is recognised unanimously: you are brilliant and shameless in doing psychological projection.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
So readers can understand the full context of our comment above, this is the unpublished comment from Mr Thompson it refers to:
Delete“Pseudo Nym has left a new comment on your post "Maddie: Another PM bites the dust":
There is nothing sordid in my past, unlike yours given the way you've behaved with females. Don't forget several have come forward, in fact you deleted their comments and banned them from your page. As I've said before, you're a disgusting creature with some very disturbing ideas of what is normal behaviour. The majority of people can see you for what you are though, the company you keep and your methods you've stooped to show you to be a vile stalker, a creep who should be kept well away from women, and an internet troll with some very strange sexually motivated behaviour.
So don't project the word "sordid" onto me. That's a cap you wear. Own it, fuck-face!
Posted by Pseudo Nym to Textusa at 25 May 2019, 15:17:00”
https://twitter.com/MancunianMEDlC/status/1132366994622308353
ReplyDeleteSOCIALIZED MEDICINE @MancunianMEDlC
Replying to @PollyGraph69 @factsonly10x and 48 others
That's Walker/Wright/KillaDog Debbie X
8:25 PM - 25 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1132367702390169600
Ismail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Replying to @MancunianMEDlC @PollyGraph69 and 48 others
Never. Has that fat lazy bastard turned up on social media again? That con artist who considers himself a computer software expert, but is literally useless and simply has his meanly paid coders do all the work so he can quoff bevvies at “working lunches” and trough the finest
8:27 PM - 25 May 2019
*****
https://twitter.com/IsmailARat5/status/1132368449139871744
Ismail A Rat @IsmailARat5
Replying to @IsmailARat5 @MancunianMEDlC and 49 others
Yorkshire pies and Copper Dragon?
Not THAT Walker? Fuck me. I’m stunned he can even register a new Twitter account without help.
He’s a proper craven sod.
8:30 PM - 25 May 2019
*****
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
https://www.9news.com.au/world/us-news-maleah-davis-derion-vence-brittany-bowens-houston-texas-missing-girl/181c38f6-8fa1-4eb4-a2b9-df4ad41f1b64
ReplyDeleteNews/World
‘Decomposition’ detected in car of man connected to missing four-year-old Texas girl
By Associated Press
8:31am May 13, 2019
Trained dogs have detected the scent of human decomposition in the vehicle of a man arrested in connection with the disappearance of a four-year-old Texas girl, according to a prosecutor.
Derion Vence, 26, remained jailed today on a US$1 million bond after being arrested a day earlier on a charge of tampering evidence, specifically a human corpse. His next court appearance is set for tomorrow.
Houston police said investigators have not found Maleah Davis and the investigation is continuing. Authorities have declined to say whether they believe Mr Vence killed Maleah.
But prosecutors said in court documents filed yesterday that Mr Vence could face additional charges, including murder.
The investigation began after Mr Vence told police that men in a truck on May 4 had abducted him, Maleah and his two-year-old son a day earlier, but had freed him and the boy.
Mr Vence told investigators he was left in the Houston suburb of Sugar Land and walked to a hospital, where he reported the girl's abduction.
Sugar Land police, who initially interviewed him, said his story kept changing and didn't add up.
Mr Vence, who had lived with Maleah and her mother, reported that his silver Nissan Altima was taken in the abduction, but surveillance video showed that vehicle was used to drop Mr Vence off at the hospital. Police found the car Thursday.
Dogs trained to find cadavers reacted to the trunk of the car, Pat Stayton, a prosecutor with the Harris County District Attorney's Office, said at Mr Vence's probable cause court hearing last night.
Surveillance video from a neighbor showed Mr Vence carrying a large, blue laundry basket with a large rubbish bag from his apartment on May 3, Mr Stayton said.
Mr Vence returned three minutes later without the basket and later he was seen leaving the apartment with cleaning supplies, including bleach.
In the silver Nissan, police found a laundry basket that looked like the one Mr Vence took out of his apartment, Mr Stayton said.
"Both of the dogs reacted to the trunk of the silver Nissan that the defendant had driven and that the blue laundry basket was recovered from, indicating that the dogs were responding to the scent of human decomposition in the vehicle," Mr Stayton said.
Investigators also found blood at the apartment, both in the hallway leading to the bathroom and on surfaces inside the bathroom, Mr Stayton said.
At last night's hearing, Mr Vence said he planned to hire a defense attorney.
Rodney Brown, an attorney appointed to represent Mr Vence only for yesterday’s hearing, had asked a magistrate judge to set bond at US$5000, saying Mr Vence was a low flight risk and had lived in Houston most of his life.
Mr Stayton argued that Mr Vence was a flight risk and there was "evidence of deception on the part of the defendant with regard to information he gave to police”.
Police have described Mr Vence as Maleah's stepfather, but Maleah's mother, Brittany Bowens, said through a spokesman that Mr Vence is her former fiancé.
Quanell X, a local civil rights activist who spoke to reporters on Ms Bowens' behalf on Friday, also said that Mr Vence had abused Maleah.
Child Protective Services removed Maleah and her brothers from the home Mr Vence and Ms Bowens shared in August after the girl suffered a head wound, but the children were returned in February, according to an agency spokeswoman.
© Nine Digital Pty Ltd 2019
Another BAD news for the EVRD dog dissers.
Deletehttps://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9156238/madeleine-mccann-wandered-off-portugal/
ReplyDeleteWe’ve had all this before but why regurgitate it now?
Gamble will cover all the bases except parental involvement.
Gamble sets the scene for any direction this case moves in.
So is it now wandered off, drunk driver hits her and takes body?
The ”Vanished “ scenario of Collins’ book.
No abductor found.
Blood in apartment is M, but G said she had nosebleeds.
Blood in car was G’s so Eddie’s alert was to blood.
So let’s forget about the dogs - they were right, but only so far.
What is happening now on twitter is in this direction.
No need for more DNA tests. All is now explained.
M left through a patio door, walked off without anybody hearing or seeing her, with no shoes and opening and closing sliding doors, child gate and gate to street.
Or did she leave through an open door that didn’t involve going down the steps where gate was? That would be impossible.
What about the “whooshing” curtains?
What about the lack of any evidence of a car accident or blood on the road?
Maybe K will now confess she may have left window open slightly and forgot?
There was no blood, M was only concussed.
How many people would believe that story? Does it matter to Mcs or SY?
Case closed, declared dead, no further searches as no clues where to look.
Endless speculation follows.
A couple of weeks ago we were being told of a supposed jailed paedo they were interested in,I think what can be determined is that SY aren't telling any one diddly squat,is there any thing to tell is the question.
DeleteH
All is still quiet on the Perlin front. Do they think the longer the silence continues Madeleine's supporters will forget this wonderful free and generous offer of finally deciding who was in the Scenic and Apartment 5A.? Well to Madeleine's supporters we will not let this offer fade into obscurity and will continue to keep it "on the front pages" for as long as it takes - for Madeleine.
ReplyDeleteDon't know whether you noticed or not but yesterday Jim Gamble was in conversation with Pat Brown on Twitter. She said nothing of any great importance yet Gamble blocked her and deleted all his tweets to her. He knows something she doesn't know and boy does he love it, such an obvious attention seeking player and cover-up merchant.
ReplyDeleteHe positively relished the Brenda Leyland gig and caused untold damage in the process. Fact!