Jules and owning the BRT

Jules, who claims that she has undeniable, unquestionable, unequivocal proof the Big Round Table existed, has decided she was the first to show the Tapas Event picture.

The Tapas Event picture (AKA Tapas Posh Esplanade picture, AKA Frog Esplanade picture AKA CMTV documentary picture) has had various versions (it even has a Ben Salmon one) published since the Frog decided to rehash a picture from our blog.

She did it first in January – no one noticed it, not even us.

A then did it again on Sept 24. This second time we certainly noticed it and said so the following day in this comment in our post “It’s September 2018 - Comments continue”: 

“Textusa25 Sep 2018, 09:55:00

https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1044313812772564992
Green Leaper‏ @FragrantFrog
Green Leaper Retweeted Green Leaper
For the benefit of those who want to see the complete big round table....... #mccann
Green Leaper added,
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DUlnHhGXcAAiwj-.jpg
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
#mccann
12:53 pm - 24 Sep 2018

*****

Finally!
After 1,662 days (Mar 7 2014 to Sept 24 2018), has someone from the opposing camp echoed our post “The Proof Ocean Club reads Textusa”:
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2014/03/the-proof-ocean-club-reads-textusa.html

Quoting ourselves:
“Lastly, our “Swan Lake - Act 3” post (10Nov2012) showed the extent of image manipulation in Mr Brunts’ Sky News video.
As you can see it has been quite a quest to find BRT.
The elusive and camera shy BRT.
Until, allegedly, November 16, 2013.
The BRT finally appeared and it came from a rather surprising source.
It was when CMTV aired its special on Maddie with Gonçalo Amaral and Francisco Moita Flores in studio.
After this documentary aired we said that we wouldn’t comment about its content until a decision from the Portuguese Justice System on the ongoing damage trial McCann v Amaral in Lisbon.
Our decision was made so as not to hinder in any way whatever tactic Mr Amaral chose to undertake with the CMTV documentary.
But there’s a detail in it that is not from Mr. Amaral, but from the Ocean Club itself.
A “rub-it-in-your-face” moment that no one, to our surprise we must confess, didn’t use to… rub it in our face: the historic moment when the BRT was finally photographed!
After Yeti and the Lochness Monster, only the BRT had remained to be photographed, until that precise moment.
In the CMTV video, part 1, at 29:00, when dealing with the Smith Sighting, to illustrate where, allegedly, Gerry McCann was at the time:”

And we show the picture the Frog has shown above.

Thank you, Frog!”

Please note the word “Finally”:

We would have admitted that the photo compromised our theory if it did. We would hardly have so enthusiastically highlighted the photo if it contradicted our theory, whilst maintaining at the same time that it didn’t.

We used it because when we saw it in 2013 (we invite anyone to show us a publication of that photo before it was shown in the CMTV documentary) we understood that it would significantly help prove our theory, as time as shown that to be so, no matter how much the handful of Monty Python’s Black Knights insisting, oblivious to reality, that “Tis but a scratch”, or as they say “Tis been proven over and over that the BRT existed!”, “Why tis that they still go on and on about the BRT?” or “Tis really annoying they won’t let go of the BRT...”.

In that post of March 7 2014, we clearly published the picture that Jules says now she was the first to publish:

Jules and her photographer (then it was only one, it would become 3 later...) are off the mark in a few years, in the photo that, according to her, is the one that will own us.

We are not aware of any publication of this picture before us.

It would seem logical that Jules obtained the picture from our post, having called her attention to it from our Sept 25 comment above. That is not the case. One indication is that the table with the tablecloth swung over showing the rough wood round top is totally visible in our picture and it isn’t in Jules’ September picture.

One could say she cropped that bit out and added the red arrow. Well, there is one detail in Jules’ photo that shows that was not the case. And the detail is that the picture shows where it came from and it wasn’t from our blog:

It came from CMOMM.

Is Jules’ photographer from Mr Thompson’s and Blacksmith’s favourite place on the internet?! It appears that to be the case!

The photo appears to have come from here:
https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t11432-table-seating-plan

Doug D credits Textusa with the photo of Tapas. Who could have imagined that we would turn out to be Jules’ photographer??

The only other picture that Jules has put up is this one:

It proves absolutely nothing. And it comes from this Chilean documentary:

We have insisted that Jules tell Silverdoe what is so interesting about this video. But strangely enough - NOT - neither seems Jules interested in telling Silverdoe nor does Silverdoe seems to be interested in knowing. Why?

Well, this is what is interesting about this video (as of 27:59):

“Hairdresser: They left them awake didn’t they? Because on the Tuesday… there’s a lady who lives above she comes in to have her hair done… and she was saying that Madeleine was crying on the Tuesday… from 10 o´clock until quarter to twelve in a panic...

Reporter: What?... and they, they not come to... to see?

Hairdresser: No, they were at Chaplin’s that night.

Reporter: In the Chaplin? Not in the other restaurant?

Hairdresser: Not on the Tuesday.”

Interesting that in August (Mrs Fenn gave her statement on Aug 21) a hairdresser knows what the PJ doesn’t or only very recently does.

This hairdresser scene is clearly staged and meaningless as it doesn’t prove that they were at Chaplin’s. But people like Silverdoe and Jules have to explain how Maddie’s crying episode is told with such detail.

What one cannot do is to say this is false and then say the esplanade images, which don’t show the BRT, are true. Either all is true or all is staged. If staged, then why? Why would a foreign TV station stage things?

Lastly, we would like to ask all those who say the Tapas Event picture proves the existence of the BRT during the whole week, if this picture proves that there was a truck parked ALL week in front of the Tapas entrance:

According to them it does. According to them, anything that was photographed on May 4 is proof that it existed and was there all the previous days. Of course it is absurd to think that truck was there all week as it is absurd to think that the esplanade looked like this all week:

It was set up like that for a single and specific day: May 4. It remained in place the next day because Maddie’s disappearance altered all plans and the event became something no one cared about with the exception of making sure that no TV station filmed it.

Jules has said that she’s going to own us. She says she has e-mails and pictures that prove that the BRT, the table used by the T9 existed. She has shown no such thing. She has put up a picture of a table that was there only for a day in that esplanade and for an event that never took place and another that frankly shows nothing. And as an indication that the Tapas Event photo proves the exact opposite of what Jules attempts uselessly to say it does, is the fact that she can scour NT’s blog and see that not once does he mention it.

But she says she has published all the pictures, she has no more pictures to show:

As we have seen, she has shown nothing. So all she has left to prove she’s not bluffing with an empty hand are the e-mails. But then it won’t be hard, she knows where those mails are:

We have put up a reminded on top of the blog so that she doesn’t forget to show these to all of us:

All in her time, of course.



Post Scriptum:

As readers know, Jules has reacted by saying that she had put the Tapas Event picture before the one that she published on Sept 29:

We asked Jules to show us when. As usually happens when we ask for Jules to put her money where her mouth was, we got nothing. No surprise there.

But then Silverdoe told us she had found it easily and told us to look for it. It turned out that by saying that Jules  had “put it up less than a week ago” it meant she was telling us to find the tweet published on Jan 22, which picture we had already published and which is at the top of this post.
 ”
We didn't look for it but a friend of the blog did. And s/he found that “early tweet”. It turns out that Jules has really published a Tapas Event picture before Sept 29. It was on... brace yourselves... on Sept 24!

A whole 5 days before!

Remember, this is all about Jules claiming that she put the picture before the Frog did. So let’s compare the Jules’ Sept 24 tweet with the one from the Frog on Jan 27, a few months before:

And we remind readers that the Frog had retweeted her Jan 27 tweet on that same Sept 24:

Only it was 3 hours before Jules tweeted hers. Another copy and paste job from her.

It seems Jules, even by bringing at the last minute this new horse called “Early Tweet”, has again lost the race to the Frog. 

The more she digs the bigger the hole she’s put herself in, becomes.