Chapter 25 – The Construction of a Suspect

 

1. Introduction

As our readers know, in the comments we are in the process of making a synopsis of Amaral’s book “Maddie, Basta de Mentiras!” (Maddie, Enough with the Lies!)

 We decided to make each chapter a separate posts, so that we are able to put up a list of links in the side column of the blog, making it easier for our readers and ourselves to go back and forth on the details the book contains, and it has many.

We have done from Chapters 25 to 29, so we will simply copy over in independent posts the comments we made about each one.

 

 2. Our synopsis

Textusa20 Oct 2021, 23:12:00

We will, on our rhythm, express our opinions on the book separating the analysis of it in the 2 parts we think it has: Maddie and Brueckner.

We will start with Brueckner first, who first appears in the book in Chapter 25 – The Construction of a Suspect.

It is clear that Amaral thinks that Rechen (name of the German operation pursuing the investigation of Brueckner (Rechen stands for Rake)) is an operation that already has many years. In fact, Chapter 20 is called «Grange, Rechen & Associates» and Ecce Homo. This chapter is about Tannerman. We remind readers that Tannerman (Ecce Homo) appeared in October 2013 in the same so-called documentary that the 2 e-fits made their public debut.

With the title of this chapter – still in the part dedicated to Maddie – Amaral links Grange and Rechen.

Back to Chapter 25, he quotes Luís Neves, present head of the PJ, the words he said to Amaral during the Lisbon trial, which he attended out of free will “«They…» - wanting to refer to the British police – «should already have found someone who would fit in the profile of abductor. The suspicion would remain and the case would finish»”.

Amaral says that NPIA was ignored because it said the parents should be considered in the investigations but Grange and Rechen with the cooperation of the Portuguese police follow one direction, to find an individual who fits the desired profile. Reaffirms that the Portuguese justice cannot let go of its competence and become a mere cooperative spectator.

A name in the PJ Files seems to fit: a 31 yr old (in 2007), male, residing in the area, suspect of robbing apartments in PdL and with an history of crimes against children.

A German citizen who up to 2015 only has 1 sentence for sexual abuse of children and sexual acts which happened in 1995. Because of this sentence he moved to the South of Portugal with a girlfriend. In Portugal he lives off seasonal work and according to friends and acquaintances, of burglary, receipt of stolen solar panels and diesel. For this last crime, stealing fuel he was in prison in 2006.

In 2014, BKA has access to a Skype chat of March 29 2013 between a wahnsinnderholger (google translate: insane recuperator), Brueckner and a Frank S.. In this convo, wahnsinnderholger says “«[…] finally I want to f*ck a little one! […] take something small and use it for days […]»”

When alerted to the risks of such acts wahnsinnderholger replies “Oh, if the evidence is destroyed after”. This is interpreted as wanting to kill his victim.

This wahnsinnderholger doesn’t stop there (sexual abuse and murder) he also wants to film the abuse while torturing the victim.

This shows that since 2014 the police knew that wahnsinnderholger had the intention of filming the torture and sexual abuse. This before any other said credible witness having come forward formally.

But what wahnsinnderholger writes does not match his acts. In June 16 2013 – 2 months after that chat conversation – CB took very abusive pictures of a 4yr old girl. He photographed her genitalia among other, according to the police, sensual poses. These photos were found in a house search on July 2 2014. At the time the victim was not identified (will be identified later in the book). CB was sentenced to 1 yr and 3 months and reason why he was extradited from Portugal in 2017.

It’s not known what happened to these photos but shows that although having in “his possession” a child, he did not have sex with her, did not torture or kill her contrary to the desires expressed in the convo with Frank S.

3. Our analysis

Textusa20 Oct 2021, 23:18:00

We would like to highlight that according to the above, although wahnsinnderholger seems to be perfectly aware that any and all evidence that the heinous acts he describes in the conversation and supposedly intends to pursue, needs to be destroyed but later has evidence (the pictures of the 4yr old) that is found by the police.

Also it should said that Frank S has a criminal history of acquisition, possession and distribution of child porn.