Blood and the EVR dog - Part 1

1. Introduction

The Maddie case, in terms of internet, has been rocked by very well-known personalities, Mr Thompson and Sade Anslow, casting doubt over Eddie’s alerts on the Scenic: they only represented alerts to blood.

Maddie: Another PM bites the dust

Unless something happens before June 7, another British Prime-Minister folds on the Maddie case.

We are obviously disappointed. As our readers know, we have expressed the opinion that the outing of the truth about what happened to Maddie was a personal issue to Theresa May.

She gave us positive signs from the start. Stood up and “invited” Jim Gamble to resign in 2010.

From 2013, and we’re talking exclusively about the case, the truth slowly but steadily broke ground. If the people from then travelled in time to today, they wouldn’t believe what is allowed to be said publicly, most importantly, in the media about the case.

But even to someone to whom the case was personal, she didn’t out the truth. We don’t know if she really wasn’t able to or if, after her certain point in time used the case as leverage to her political ambitions. Only she will know that.

Our hope is that the public opinion is by now so convinced of a cover-up that archiving the case will be a bigger embarrassment to the nation than it is to reveal the truth.

Time will tell.

Gender-correctness

It is not from the absence of a reasonable amount of warning, which we have given you as much as a reasonable person should but as you people do continue, even defiantly, to insist on the subject regardless, let’s continue as promised. We’re now making it a post.

Interesting how the same ‘crime’ – alleged gender-impersonation – is “a vertically-challenged Portuguese female impersonator” when it comes to the blog but is then only “people who are basically minding their own business” when it comes to their friends.

Like the Portuguese say, here, there are no children and then step-children. We are all children here. Let’s stop the hypocrisy once and for all.

We would like to add that we would never reveal a ‘do not publish’ comment - we’re only just expressing surprise at the change of attitude afterwards, completely contrary to the content of the comment

Oh, and we would also like to add a big thank you to them for clarifying something for us. All help and clarification is welcomed.

The protection of the McCanns by José António Saraiva - Comments continue

As is common practice of the blog, once a post reaches the 200 comment mark, we open up a new post so that comments may continue.

The protection of the McCanns by José António Saraiva

The blog received a comment from our reader Strawberry Vodka, posting a link to an article which went unnoticed, was ridiculed or disregarded and although we haven’t expanded on it we believe it to be of the utmost importance.

This was the comment on our post “Rua Segura - April 9/10/11 2019 ”: