Monday, 13 April 2009

Ça Suffit, Enough is Enough.

(April 13th, 2009)

Foreword: This text was written with the intent of being posted on the 3Arguidos Forum as it refers to people and events there. However, the action proposed below is a proposal valid to anybody who uses the net and is seeking, like myself, the truth and the application of Justice.  

The objective of war is to win it, not to kill your opponent. Simply withdraw all his will to fight you. Convince him that that it’s hopeless or worthless to do so. Once he’s convinced of that, you’ve won. 

This convincing can be done either through a huge amount of means of warfare such as armored divisions or navy fleets; or by a few physical means but with a huge effect such as nuclear or biological weapons or, importantly, through few means with limited physical effect but with an huge damaging effect on the opponent’s morale. 

Examples of these are terrorism, suicide bombers and snipers. 

Logically, the use of these “few means” is known as asymmetrical warfare, since they involve so little resources to be able to influence so many, and are, currently, as we all know so well, the biggest headache of the big-army wielding nations of our time. 

But terrorism is only effective if you have popular support. Suicide bombers only if, and let’s be practical about it, you have people willing to physically die. 

Now, to guarantee the success of snipers, it’s only required a way to hide and, from that standpoint, to be able to shoot your opponent. Or whoever’s harm or death will affect his morale. 

It’s a terrible and terrifying weapon, usually carried out by sadistic inhuman people. Able to shoot someone unarmed in the back or in the side or wherever, just because they were in the wrong place and time, and then go home, put on the slippers, kiss the wife, pat the dog on the head, read a night-night story to the kids and fall asleep on the couch while watching TV. 

On the same decency level as human-trafficking or drug selling. Or worse. Sarajevo in the 1990’s was paradigmatic of this human nightmare. 

A sniper will pin you down. You cannot advance anywhere. Your focus is totally directed to survival. The initiative is totally theirs. They control the moves and the rhythm. 

In this situation, you have one of three choices: stay put, withdraw or eliminate the threat. The third option, easier said than done. And this is what the 3Arguidos forum has become: a victim of sniper fire. 

It has lost objectiveness and purpose. It’s lost its initiative. Refusing to pull out due to rightful conscientious reasons, and apparently unable to eliminate the threat, it’s staying put. 

You know who the forum sniper’s are. Those that keep on questioning the veracity of the obvious over and over again. Tirelessly. Asking for justifications but providing none in return. Demanding respect and showing none. Insulting, but so, so easily offended. 

Their technique? Through simple and pure contradiction. Denial of the evidence. Whatever you present they will demand the provision of proof, and will keep on doing so over and over again independently of how irrefutable it is what you have stated. 

This continuous senseless rebuttal makes the whole process apparently endless, making you feel exhausted and completely unable to push your message across, so you simply give up. 

For example, for argument’s sake, you state that the Sun is the provider of our daily sunlight. The sniper(s) will ask what scientific basis you had to make such an adamant statement. The game then begins. And will go on until you are able build a spaceship capable of capturing the Sun, bring it back to Earth and place it physically on his(their) hands. 

Mind you, even then, only if it’s done at night, and on a moonless one at that. Anything less than that, they say, is pure supposition and will not uphold in any court of law. And why? Just because they say it won’t.

And that statement, because it’s theirs, suffices. 

How many times have the dogs olfactory capabilities have been justified here? And did they ever require any justification? No, we all know them as truthful. And yet, from time to time, there pops a question about some judge in somewhere land raising doubts about dogs and their noses… 

How many times have you presented them with a whole forest, and they pick on a twig that happens to be moving slightly out of pace with the wind, centering the discussion on that totally irrelevant detail? 

They throw in the bait, and you bite it. Whole. Before you know, even yourself have forgotten about the forest and do start to worry about why that damn twig is shaking the way it is, and start to argument about it… 

Understandably, good people have left the forum and have never come back. 

Dear friends, all the events have been scrutinized to their utmost detail. Only to confirm what is already known: Maddie is dead. Her parents, namely Kate, were directly involved in her death. All Tapas 9 were involved in the hiding of the corpse. There’s a monstrous cover-up, at the highest level on both Portuguese and English governments, protecting these people. 

I think I have not surprised anybody up now. And that’s exactly my point. You/we are all apparently comfortable discussing and re-discussing the same issues time and time again, instead of focusing all the effort and ideas on what can, should and is to be done to bring these people to justice. 

The snipers have, up to now, successfully, accomplished their mission. I realize that I’m being unjust to some and unfair to most, but, as you know, I like to speak my mind. And the biggest compliment I can pay to the forum is the freedom of speech allowed, very much not in accordance with what happens in the UK. And compliments are certainly due. 

I would like to take my hat off and bow to Tony Benett and Laffin Assassin. Also to all those who have painstakingly translated the DVDs, of which I’ll compliment Astro in the name of them all. To Bren, for keeping it alive and healthy at the cost of unquantifiable amounts of patience, none the least for my long posts. 

My apologies to all those who deserve a word of gratitude and aren’t finding any at this point. 


On April 1995, Eric, a French peace keeper of the UN who was putting containers to protect people from snipers is killed by a sniper in Sarajevo. He was driving a bulldozer. The scene was filmed and on the shown on prime-time news worldwide. 

I don’t know if it’s real or not, but it’s attributed to the then French President François Mitterrand the phrase “Ça suffit”

Irrelevant of what he said, or didn’t say, Sarajevo was, from then on, rid of the sniper problem. They were hunted like the animals they were, with no care of what the rest of the world thought. A decisive action and snipers were no more. 

Every time you reply to a pinkie, you’re playing their game on their terms and on their turf. They will certainly proceed to accuse me of “another” attempted disruption, of the use of needless violence or even of being the bearer of unacceptable arrogance. 

I’ve been accused here of all that and more. For example, of being a megalomaniac with a sick perverted mind and even of wanting to literally skin a cat. Me and others like myself, have been hit by waves of insults, at various times and to various degrees of severity. 

All in an attempt, successful I must say, to maintain the focus on what is irrelevant. DCB, Sans_souci, chinagirl and the like. You know them better than me. 

Just a word to these people. Your comments will go unanswered, at least by me. If you wish to play the offended damsel please don’t forget to throw your head backwards, the back your left hand on the forehead and let your body gracefully drop to the floor, ruffling skirt and all, while the scene fades… Do whatever you like, but please do fade away once and for all. 

I may be guilty of all of what I’m accused, although I don’t think I am, but am certainly innocent of the most significant crimes that are committed here: covering, protecting, justifying or whitewashing murderous scum.

Let’s take back what we should have never lost. The initiative. 

We bloggers, and forum creators and mods do our bit. We’ve maintained, albeit the pressure, the issue alive. We do get people coming from all corners of the world, but it’s not enough.
Up to now, we’ve been satisfied with fighting this war on “this” ground. Much the result of the total efficiency of the snipers and less out of free will or decision made on our part. 

But the winds favour us. The Portuguese have blatantly and publicly declared their dislike for the McCanns. Ripped and vandalized their posters. The Portuguese media, with the exception of SIC and Expresso, no longer have patience for them. Just as the English “serious” press. 

Even The Sun is not keeping up pace with the issue anymore. Downing Street is fragilized with the e-mail scandal, confirming its tendencies to manipulate information. 

Gordon Brown is, with or without the referred scandal, on his way out. Freeport is eroding the Portuguese government. Loyalties are starting to realign themselves in both countries… 

Kate seems to be on the verge of breaking. Money is running out. The McCanns are cornered. They can smell it like the rats they are. Time has come for the decisive blow. We have to force justice to act. 

We have the numbers, so we have to make that uncooperative, supposedly blindfolded, lady to do something. And the key word here is numbers. 

Numbers of people, known as voters, or otherwise called public pressure. In the political circles known as those-that-you-must-please-at-all-costs. My proposal is quite simple. We all get junk mail. All those mails about how Microsoft/Apple/Intel/AOL will pay us 1 cent per each mail we send out, or those that an African King wants to share a fortune with us, or even those that if you don’t send it to 12 friends in the next 12 minutes your whole family will suffer a fate worse than the Devil himself could possibly imagine. 

We also receive those pharmaceutical ones that have replaced the ones that promised the augmentation of penises so persistently (all lies Fred says). And those from my caring loving friends who like to express, in powerpoint, how much they do love me as well as another 20 addressees that they love as much as they love me. 

Well, these junk e-mails contain hundreds, if not thousands of precious valid e-mail addresses. Instead of deleting them, copy the addresses. Then, create a mail where the sender is identified as “Maddie McCann”

Give the mail a title such as “FW: Do you REALLY want to know what happened to me?” In the body of the mail, copy the various links to the various blogs/forums that you think are significant to clarify people’s minds and get the message across. In my case, I’m using the links provided in Joana’s blog:

End the mail with a “If you DO care, please do forward this mail to your friends. As many as you can”.

Do throw in a couple of newspaper addresses so that they realize what is going on.

On my first mail, which had 132 copied e-mail addresses, I wrote the following: “Visit the following sites and make your own judgment: (sites listed above) If you care, please do forward this mail to as many friends as you can. Join the WORLD community that wants to bring the McCann scum to Justice. Justice shall prevail!”

This way we will let the world know what is known about Maddie and what has been, and is, written about her.

Most importantly, as the forwarding of the mail is a personal decision, let them make up their own minds.

Very simple and entirely in your humble hands. Let’s take the war out to “their beaches”, and as Frank Sinatra would sing… start spreading the news.

And let’s see what truth is truth itself capable to bring us all.

God bless.


  1. Can I respectfully request that you not leave abusive and profane comments on other websites.

  2. Sir, Ma'am

    I'll respectfully leave that sort of thing for you, exclusively, to do.


Comments are moderated.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.