Wednesday 24 June 2020

Gonçalo Amaral - Jornal das 8, TVI - June 21 2020 20:00 (Part II)

 

We are publishing today the second part of Gonçalo Amaral's appearance on the "Jornal das 8", last Sunday.

Our translation:
 

José Alberto Carvalho: Let me ask you this question Gonçalo Amaral, could Christian Brueckner be the author of… whatever happened to Madeleine McCann or not?

Gonçalo Amaral: To answer that question, it needs first to be demonstrated that there was an abduction. And what I can demonstrate is that all those people who were there lied, there was never any scheme to… monitor the children who were at home, sleeping in the apartments… they went to the apartments to use the WC, this is written in statements they made, they told the receptionist that they were going to the apartment to see their children, they didn’t say they were going to the bathroom because the bathroom by the pool didn’t have great conditions to go there, they simulated a situation of abduction with the window, with the opening of it all... saying that the window was open, it was closed, a big mess...

JAC: First it was closed, then it was open...

GA: Where, where there is only one fingerprint...

JAC: Hmmm, hmmm

GA: …that is from the child's mother… there are no signs of burglary in that apartment, so, there are only 2 ways to get in, one with a false key, which was investigated and we did not reach conclusions that said it could have been used, so in principle it was not and the other entrance through the entrance of the sliding doors where everyone entered, alone. They led us… so, they lied, there were many lies, they led the PJ to… to waste a lot of time and to follow a path that… for example, took us to Robert Murat. There is a witness who tells us... he points the way of the man who carried the child to Robert Murat's villa. And despite this, this… let's say mistake, it was thanks to Robert Murat, thanks to the publicity surrounding Robert Murat, that we were able to have such a testimony from the Irish. That it is one of the Irish who says, that he sees, that he sees that man who he says that, he is their father, that he says, states that he is the father and I don't know in how much percent that he is the girl's father and who says this is not…

JAC: Gerry McCann was transporting the child...

GA: ...it is not Robert Murat, that one I know. So, this is all in the process. And it's in the process, and notice…

JAC: But it's also in the process...

GA: Just notice one thing, notice one thing...

JAC: Gonçalo Amaral let me, let me try to know...

GA: This, this, these people, these people, this is important to be said, these people who did what they did, which is... during that week they abandoned their children... where even, in this specific case, in this apartment from which Madeleine disappeared, Madeleine herself, on the previous day, or two before, was around… more than 10 pm crying more than, for more than an hour, screaming for her parents and no one went there, so, we don’t… we don’t know why they didn’t go, but the fact is that the surveillance system was not working, so to speak, or it was no longer necessary at that time, I agree, it may have been for any reason that we don’t know, but the fact is that she was there abandoned. And these people who abandoned their children, who lied to the police and continue to lie because they never told the truth of what actually happened, and that it was necessary to carry out a reconstitution in Portugal, still remains today to move or not move what went on there, and in fact define times, because it is necessary...

JAC: Why was this reconstitution never done?

GA: It wasn't done because there was a lot of media pressure. We were unable to do there the reconstitution...

JAC: In peace?

GA: Not just in peace, in practical terms. I, I remind you of just one… it’s… but going back a bit in terms of the reconstitution, these people left Portugal. They left Portugal, they all left and never came here… the… the couple…

JAC: But they were here for a long time, in those days after the… the…

GA: Exactly, but the friends had already left, and if they were Portuguese, have no doubts, they were here in Portugal, surely the reconstruction would have been done at any time. Here, the friends later refused to come back to do… do the reconstitution…

JAC: But were they summoned to it, were they notified for it?

GA: They were just as witnesses.

JAC: Hmm, hmm.

GA: And they refused to come. And if you notice, if you notice, over the years the British newspapers, and all the other newspapers in the world, are so… but mainly the British are interested in the case and never ever tried to interview some of those people who were there, just and only the couple, so the all others who planned that scheme in terms of delivering 2 controversial documents...

JAC: Even in the 8-episode documentary that…

GA: …and I don't know how many more…

JAC: …is available on Netflix, these people don't appear, it's true…

GA: And they didn't appear.

JAC: It is true.

GA: And so, just to remind you this, we, from that point at which it was made... this sighting was made, let's say, this testimony...

JAC: That testimony that is related to that night around 10 pm

GA: ...in principle Madeleine was on the man's arms (imperceptible), we tried, we tried at a certain time... running away from journalists, to cover that whole area even in terms of houses, from there to the sea. And when we were almost halfway, one of us is discovered, and we had to leave the area. It was a diligence that we never managed to finish, because of… the confusion that arose there…

JAC: The number of journalists that were there, yes...

GA: This was...

JAC: Let me...

GA: ...what happened.

JAC: Very well. Gonçalo Amaral, at the time, one can now understand, and I wanted to ask you this: Christian Brueckner was one of the people who came to be identified as one of the people of interest for the investigation at the time, as far as it was reported there were 6… 600 people or over time it was accumulated 600 people time who could be of interest for the investigation…

GA: A lot of diligences within the process, surveys were done...

JAC: Was Christian Brueckner one of those 600 people or not?

GA: Only rereading the whole process finding...

JAC: You have no memory of that?

GA: I have been told that yes, that there went there knocking on the door, colleagues who are retired like me and who said that the person was not at home. But there were hundreds...

JAC: But, that is, but it must have been...

GA: They were in the hundreds, as, and not only of that type of typology but above all paedophiles...

JAC: But note one thing Gonçalo Amaral, the, the question that is here... but the question that is here is...

GA: It could have been theft, we also...

JAC: We know that he served a sentence...

GA: …did a survey of burglars, namely burglary in apartments, and apparently this man was not in the list of apartment burglaries, he will have stolen…

JAC: Fuel...

GA: Yes, fuel.

JAC: Yes, but now what is known about... apparently what is known about this man is truly worrying, about... from various points of view...

GA: It's like I say, an almost perfect suspect...

JAC: But, but... but it is known that he has a long record of sexual crimes...

GA: Hmmm, hmmm.

JAC: …that in contrary to seem to be other such criminals, who do not have a particular fixation on a certain age, there are, there are apparently random behaviours, moreover he is sentenced for the rape of an American tourist…

GA: What I heard...

JAC: …75 years old at, at… the rape happened…

GA: Yes...

JAC: …at Praia da Luz…

GA: Yes, yes...

JAC: You know also... anyway, I would like to... that is, what I would like to understand is if he was investigated and if... why did the interest in him disappear, or if he was never taken seriously, with the information that was there at the time?

GA: You know... the, the information there was about paedophiles was only that they were paedophiles and people who were close to the village and as José Alberto said, they are in the hundreds and it is not possible to investigate each one in detail. Going further, I remember that, for example, we reached Albufeira… Albufeira [60Km East of PdL] and Tavira [120 km East of PdL] and so on, and investigations cannot be done that way…

JAC: Gonçalo Amaral, but wait, this rape of this American tourist...

GA:… and note, and note, what if…

JAC: ...was two years before Madeleine's disappearance...

GA: …what if… say again?

JAC: The rape of the 72 year old American tourist, I said 75…

GA: When was it communicated in terms to the PJ?

JAC: When was it?


GA: I don't know (shrugs)...

JAC: No... I don't know...

GA: I didn’t know of it at the time.

JAC: There was no… no, if… the lady filed a complaint…

GA: We, for example, I can tell you...

JAC: ...the lady made a complaint...

GA: Where?

JAC: (…)

GA: When?


JAC: (…)

GA: Yes, in terms of the PJ, in terms of knowing... and if we are looking for a paedophile...

JAC: Because this man...

GA: …or are we looking for a, a, a rapist of adults?

JAC: No, no, no... of course...

GA: I remind you...

JAC: ...but it happened two, two years earlier and he, he is now being held in a German prison, exactly serving a sentence, for this crime... this is the crime that led him to, now, to prison. And then it was possible...

GA: And he was identified much later...

JAC: He was identified in 2018...

GA: Well ... there it is, so in 2007 he wasn't identified.

JAC: …based on 2 evidences… based on two essential evidences….

GA: In 2007 he was not identified.

JAC: ...but there is hair that was found on the victim's bed...

GA: Yes...

JAC: …victim of the rape that was preserved and that now has allowed to update and make a match, make the…

GA: Yes. But that's another investigation, not the…

JAC: Certainly.

GA: ...Maddie case, it's another investigation ...

JAC: But it turns out that this man, who stayed in the Algarve and in that region for some time, it is how this is expl(ained)… this is how, how I try to understand, the photographs that were released by the German police about the houses, the places , vehicles, etc ... and I would also like to hear you about this, about, about these... this exercise from the German police which is to appeal to the memory of someone with some details very... I don't know if they are subtle, no... but, anyway, with some details and, and… do the photographs tell you something, for example, be it of the houses or of the vehicles that the German police revealed?

GA: I think the appeal serves what it serves, because for example the motorhome was removed, it was taken from Portugal to Germany to be examined, so from there...

JAC: A white and yellow VW Westfalia motorhome ...

GA: …and what was important was that, trying to understand why… those images that are passed and that were passed…


JAC: These?

GA: ...have been altered.

JAC: These? These are the images I collected yesterday, from the website of the German police...

GA: I can show you...

JAC: … the BKA.


GA: I can show you the… a photograph, which is the photograph of the vehicle that this suspect was using, and would be using in 2007, according to the German police, and which is totally different from what they have shown us…

JAC: Is that the vehicle?


 
GA: This is the vehicle. And if you notice the photo that is passing in the image there ...

JAC: But the vehicle is not the same!

GA: It's the same, it is.

JAC: Is it?

GA: If you notice the photo, if you have another photo of the…

JAC: We have.

GA: …rear of vehicle…

JAC: I think so ... I ... I ... have been gathering ... is it this one, this one?


GA: If you notice, you can see that in that image there are two details there, first it was covered the... one can noticed that there is a colour missing, there is a black in the middle and there is a new logo on the right side. Then there's the registration plate...

JAC: I'm going to let the image be enlarged a little…


GA: ...the registration plate, covered, and has the letter "D", the registration number is Portuguese.

JAC: Because the car was...

GA: The car is from 82 and was registered in Portugal in 2004. If you want you can have the photo.

JAC: So, what you're saying is that this...

GA: Regarding the same pho… the same vehicle…

JAC: This photo is from when, do you have an idea?

GA: That photograph? That photograph is from last year.

JAC: This is from last year?

GA: It's from last year, so what is intended to be known is, and you have here another photo...

JAC: That is, that is ...but last year that van that we were seeing in the images was already in Germany, or not?

GA: It would have gone from Portugal last year for Germany.

JAC: And was this photograph taken in Portugal or in Germany?


GA: In Portugal.

JAC: Hmm.

GA: This is another photograph of the same vehicle.


JAC: Excuse me...

GA: Now what one asks, what one asks, what?

JAC: That is, what are you saying with this?

GA: What am I saying? It's evident.

JAC: Is that the, the van that was shown in…

GA: ... the, the, the photo of the motorhome is completely different.

JAC: No, this motor… it's not the same motorhome.


GA: This is the same motorhome.

JAC: Hmm.

GA: This is the same motorhome, and it was the motorhome that was taken from here to Germany, to be examined where... and was used here as a deposit for figs and carob.

JAC: Hmm, hmm.

GA: And, it appeared... then this image appears without this personalization, so to speak...

JAC: Of these drawings?

GA: Yes, without those drawings. And what one asks is this, would that vehicle go unnoticed in Praia da Luz, in any other location or not? Surely not. And what one further asks is, there are several... what one asks is, did the... the German authorities come to the conclusion that at the time of 2007 the vehicle was not like this but was still painted white and so on? Who told them that?

JAC: Hmm.


GA: Could it be that the German authorities, or the Germans or the English, I don't know who did this, it certainly wasn't in Portugal, because the Portuguese did not disclose the photographs, and in fact they have not disclosed anything in relation to the process, is it that whoever has disclosed that is trying to check information, so to speak? If someone calls, look, I saw the car on this location and... forget it, you didn't see anything because the car was in another way.

JAC: Gonçalo Amaral, let me ask you, it is possible to know more...

GA: So there are several versions here...

JAC: …information about these photographs, where were they taken?

GA: These photographs were taken in the Algarve.

JAC: In the Alg .. right, in a location…

GA: You know that I know a lot of people who, who...

JAC: Yes...

GA: ...know the Algoz [55Km East of PdL] area...

JAC: …you worked in the Algarve for many years…

GA: ...people who are dedicated to picking oranges and other things... so they are photographs.

JAC: Hmmm…

GA: Now, another question, still in relation to... in the end, I don’t want to be dominating, say, the interview... there is something different about this, in this whole situation of... the almost perfect suspect as I call him, the scapegoat however one wants to say… there is a new data here, a data that hasn’t been arrived yet in terms of information, so, there’s a lot… the bomb was dropped, it was said that the suspect is similar to a… he isn’t, the images that are, are with 43 years old, so if you look at my images from 2013, I am completely different, as people change… but the new data, the new data, what is there, is that someone…

JAC: In other words, instead of disclo… this photograph that is being disseminated is current and it should have been one of 13 years ago, is that what you are saying?


GA: Yeah ... that (laughs) would be interesting. And... there's a new data here. The new data is that the German authorities are asking ... they are... it seems that they are trying to reexamine all, all the vestiges, hepatic, biological, hematic and biological...

JAC: Blood.

GA: …that have been found. Where? We wait... Where? Inside the apartment, in the vehicle...

JAC: Rented...

GA: …rented by the couple and also on the street. There are only 3 places where vestiges were found: inside the apartment, on the street, where there is blood, where these vestiges were collected, and inside the couple's vehicle rented I don't know how many days later, I no longer remember. And this is what is the new data. And this is the big question: do the German authorities think they will solve the case, when… I even thought it was a wrong translation when a… a German police officer says that the child may have been shot inside the apartment… What does that mean? That there was blood. And in fact it was... it was the dogs, those dogs... someone said somewhere... a lawyer [Rogério Alves] connected to the couple said that our investigation, that what was in my book, which is basically our investigation in those 4 months, it was not 13 years, nor 13 months, it was 4 months… that our investigation had been a fantasy, a fable… but you know that dogs were used, dogs sent by the English and suggested by the English, because it was them who suggested a death…

JAC: Yes...

GA: A death, worse, we talk of and...

JAC: I remember those images, the dogs identified the scent of blood...

GA: …we have always talked of an accident and the English speak about homicide. It's not us. They are the ones who talk about homicide. We talk about an accident. This is documented. And, such a shooting produces blood. We… in the examination that was carried out at the site, no vestige of a shooting was found, nor does the child who in the man’s arms show signs of having been shot, what she has is that she is sleeping soundly, this is said by the people who passed by there.

JAC: Seemed to be sleeping soundly.

GA: Seemed to be sleeping soundly. And so this is the data, is that the dogs that made these markings and these markings were made by the dogs, the vestiges that were collected with the help of these dogs, from the said fable, are the ones that the German police want to analyse. When saliva is spoken about...

JAC: Gonçalo Amaral, let me just try, let me just try to understand something...

GA: Just, just to finish this question of the vestiges, when it comes to the saliva in Maddie's bed, it is a lie, it was not in Maddie's bed, it is in the bed by the window, and what the saliva is, is a mixture of baby saliva with breast milk... and were identified, the mother and the people who were in that apartment.

JAC: Before the McCanns?

GA: Before the McCanns. And, therefore, we have to wait...

JAC: Gonçalo Amaral, I only have 1 minute left...

GA: ...to understand in what this will give...

JAC: …we only have 1 minute here, I would like, I would really like to prolong this conversation but unfortunately it won't be possible. We are here... what could be the interest of the German police in allowing themselves to be seduced, in your opinion by what you have just explained, in face of a, a ... a lead that leads nowhere in your opinion?

GA: It leads. It leads for the German authorities to have competence to investigate the case.

JAC: And they have?

GA: If they have a German suspect, there are those who say yes, there are those who say no, the case is here...

JAC: Can this be good or bad for the discovery of the material truth?

GA: I think that the police ... the Portuguese authorities and the Portuguese police can do here, our laboratories, what the Germans want to do there. There was no need to let it go to Germany again...

JAC: It already was.

GA: It was, it was last year, again something to be examined, it could have been examined here. It had already happened like that, that is said it was a mistake when it was...

JAC: Let me repeat this question because it seems that your answer may be interesting, the fact that it is the German police who are conducting the investigation now, based on this, on this pretext, which is what I understand from your words...

GA: The German police conduct the investigation there in Germany...

JAC: But can that be a good thing?

GA: …because here, the PJ is the one conducting the investigation.

JAC: The question is, can this be good and, and relevant, or not for finding evidence that can explain what happened that day? In more (imperceptible)...

GA: Nowadays there are new techniques for, for analysing and, and... for... and even re-analyse what has been examined. If there is enough remnant, it is possible to reach other conclusions. I remind that in the vehicle rented by the couple there are hairs that were returned that is said that by the colouring it’s from the missing girl's, but as they have no root, they are unable to dee… to determine the DNA. It is known that there are laboratories that can do this...

JAC: Now...

GA: …so Germans who have money can easily solve this mystery.

JAC: Gonçalo Amaral, I had many more questions to ask you...

GA: And I had a lot more to say.

JAC: I appreciate your availability, surely this will be in the next hours in the international media, right? In Germany, in England, which van is this after all...

GA: The one they presented.

JAC: Yes, right, right, right, we have no… no, there is no photograph from the German authorities with… an indication of the license plate, which could be… help to understand better…

GA: That may have been a technique. It's the same one.

JAC: Yes, but are you sure it's the same one?

GA: Oh, it's the same one!

JAC: This is the same one that was shown, but it is not the same because it was like that and now it is in another way. Gonçalo Amaral, thank you very much, for, for… for the contribution you ended up giving here. In the face of this case that continues to impassion and divide the opinions of many people until it is finally closed, if ever that will be possible. Do you believe it will be possible?



GA: There is a colleague of mine with whom I had lunch recently who says yes, and I believe him, that… that a lot is still going to happen. So let's wait...

JAC: Thank you very much, we will really have to stop here...

GA: It may take another 13 years and then I don't know if I'm here anymore...

JAC: Anyway, yes, it would be very, very prolonged. Thank you very much Gonçalo Amaral once again.

*****


The original:


José Alberto Carvalho: Deixe-me fazer esta pergunta Gonçalo Amaral, pode ter sido Christian Brueckner o autor do… do que seja o que for o que aconteceu à Madeleine McCann ou não?

Gonçalo Amaral: Para responder a essa pergunta, primeiro é preciso demonstrar que existiu um rapto. E aquilo que eu posso demonstrar é que todos aquelas pessoas que ali estiveram mentiram , nunca existiu nenhum esquema de… de vigilância dos filhos que estavam em casa, nos apartamentos a dormir… deslocaram-se aos apartamentos para utilizar o WC, isso está escrito em declarações que prestaram, diziam à recepcionista que iam ao apartamento ver os filhos, não diziam que iam à casa de banho porque a casa de banho junto à piscina não tinha grandes condições para lá irem, simularam uma situação de entrada de rapto com a janela , com a abertura daquilo tudo… dizendo que a janela estava aberta, estava fechada, uma grande confusão…

JAC: Primeiro estava fechada, depois ficou aberta…

GA: Onde, onde só há uma impressão digital…

JAC: Hmmm, hmmm

GA: …que é da mãe da criança… não há sinais de arrombamento naquele apartamento, portanto, só há 2 formas de ali entrar, uma com uma chave falsa, que foi investigada e não chegámos a conclusões que dissessem que poderia ter sido utilizada, portanto em princípio não o foi e a outra entrada pela portada por onde todos entravam, sozinhos. Levaram-nos… portanto, mentiram, houve muitas mentiras, levaram a PJ a… a perder muito tempo e encaminhar-se por um caminho que… por exemplo, levaram-nos a Robert Murat. Há uma testemunha que nos diz… indica o caminho do homem que levava a criança ao colo para a vivenda de Robert Murat. E, apesar desse, desse… digamos erro, foi de graças ao Robert Murat, de graças à publicidade em torno de Robert Murat, que nós conseguimos ter o tal testemunho dos irlandeses. Que é um dos irlandeses que diz, que vê, que avista aquele homem que diz que, é o pai deles, que afirma, que é o pai a não sei quantos por cento que é o pai da miúda e que diz este não é…

JAC: Gerry McCann transportava a criança…

GA: …não é Robert Murat, que esse conheço eu. Portanto, isto está tudo no processo. E está no processo, e repare…

JAC: Mas também está no processo…

GA: Repare só numa coisa, repare numa coisa…

JAC: Gonçalo Amaral deixe-me, deixe-me tentar saber…

GA: Este, este, estas pessoas, estas pessoas, isto é importante que se diga, estas pessoas que fizeram o que fizeram, que é o… durante aquela semana abandonaram os filhos… onde até, neste caso concreto, neste apartamento de onde desapareceu Madeleine, a própria Madeleine esteve, no dia anterior, ou dois antes, cerca das… mais das 10 da noite a chorar mais de, durante mais de uma hora, a gritar pelos pais e ninguém lá foi, portanto não se… não se sabe porque razão não foram, mas o facto é que não estava a funcionar o sistema de vigilância, digamos assim, ou já não era necessário àquela hora, concordo, pode ter sido por qualquer razão que desconhecemos, mas o facto é que ela esteve e esteve ali abandonada. E estas pessoas que abandonaram os filhos, que mentiram à polícia e continuam a mentir porque nunca contaram a verdade do que efectivamente se passou, e que era necessária realizar uma reconstituição em Portugal, ainda hoje se mantém para afastar ou não afastar o que ali se passou, e de facto definir tempos, porque é necessário…

JAC: Porque é que essa reconstituição nunca foi feita?

GA: Não foi feita porque houve muita pressão mediática. Nós não conseguíamos fazer ali a reconstituição…

JAC: Em sossego?

GA: Não só em sossego, em termos práticos. Eu, eu recordo-lhe só uma… é… mas voltando um pouco atrás em termos da reconstituição, estas pessoas saíram de Portugal. Saíram de Portugal, saíram todos e nunca vieram para cá… os… o casal…

JAC: Mas tiveram cá durante bastante tempo, naqueles dias a seguir à… à…

GA: Exactamente, mas os amigos já tinham saído, e se fossem portugueses, não tenha dúvida, estavam cá em Portugal, seguramente que a reconstituição teria sido feita em qualquer altura. Aqui os amigos recusaram recusaram-se mais tarde a vir fazer…  realizar a reconstituição…

JAC: Mas foram intimados a isso, foram notificados para isso?

GA: Estavam apenas como testemunhas.

JAC: Hmm, hmm.

GA: E recusaram-se a vir. E se reparar, se reparar, ao longo destes anos os jornais britânicos, e todos os outros jornais do mundo, são tão… mas principalmente os britânicos estão interessados no caso e nunca, mas nunca foram tentar entrevistar algumas daquelas pessoas que ali estavam, apenas e só o casal, portanto os outros todos que planearam aquele esquema em termos de entregar 2 documentos controversos…

JAC: Mesmo no documentário de 8 episódios que…

GA: …e não sei quantos mais…

JAC: …está disponível na Netflix essas pessoas não aparecem, é verdade…

GA: E não apareceram.

JAC: É verdade.

GA: E portanto, só para lhe recordar isto, nós, a partir daquele ponto em que foi feito… efectuado esse avistamento, digamos assim, esse testemunho…

JAC: Esse testemunho que é relativo àquela noite por volta das 10 da noite

GA: …em princípio a Madeleine vai ao colo (imperceptível), nós tentámos, tentámos a determinada hora… fugindo dos jornalistas, bater toda aquela zona até em termos de residências, a partir dali até ao mar. E quando já estávamos quase a meio do caminho, algum de nós é descoberto, é nós tivemos de abandonar a zona. Foi uma diligência que nunca conseguimos acabar, por causa do… da confusão que, que ali se armou…

JAC: A quantidade de jornalistas que havia ali, sim…

GA: Isto foi…

JAC: Deixe-me…

GA: …o que se passou.

JAC: Muito bem. Gonçalo Amaral, na altura, percebe-se agora, e eu queria perguntar-lhe isto: Christian Brueckner foi uma das pessoas que chegou a ser identificada como das pessoas de interesse para a investigação na altura, tanto quanto foi noticiada haviam 6… chegou a haver 600 pessoas ou ao longo do tempo acumularam-se 600 pessoas que podiam ser de interesse para a investigação…

GA: Foram realizadas muitas diligências no âmbito do processo, foram feitos levantamentos...

JAC: Christian Brueckner foi uma dessas 600 pessoas ou não?

GA: Só relendo todo o processo encontrando de…

JAC: Não tem memória disso?

GA: Já me disseram que sim, que tinham lá ido bater à porta, colegas que são reformados como eu e que disseram que a pessoa não estava em casa. Mas foram às centenas…

JAC: Mas, ou seja, mas deve ter sido…

GA: Foram às centenas, e não só esse tipo de tipologias, mas sobretudo de pedófilos…

JAC: Mas repare uma coisa Gonçalo Amaral, a, a questão que está aqui… mas é que a questão que está aqui em causa é…

GA: Pode ter sido por furto, nós também andámos…

JAC: Sabemos que ele cumpriu uma pena…

GA: …a fazer um levantamento de pessoas de furto, nomeadamente de furtos em apartamentos, e ao que parece este senhor não estava na listagem de furtos de apartamentos terá roubado…

JAC: Combustível…

GA: Sim, combustível.

JAC: Sim, mas agora aquilo que se sabe sobre… aparentemente se sabe sobre este homem é verdadeiramente preocupante, sobre… sobre vários pontos de vista…

GA: É como eu lhe digo, um suspeito quase perfeito…

JAC: Mas, mas… mas sabe-se que ele tem um longo cadastro de crimes sexuais…

GA: Hmmm, hmmm.

JAC: …que ao contrário daquilo que parecem ser outros criminosos deste, desta tipologia, que não têm uma especial fixação numa determinada idade, há, há comportamentos aparentemente aleatórios, aliás de resto ele está condenado pela violação duma turista americana…

GA: Aquilo que eu ouvi…

JAC: …de 75 anos na, na… ocorrida a violação…

GA: Sim…

JAC: …na Praia da Luz…

GA: Sim, sim…

JAC: Sabes também… enfim, eu gostava de o… ou seja, o que eu gostava de perceber é se ele foi investigado e se… porque é que desapareceu o interesse sobre ele, ou se nunca foi encarado seriamente, com a informação que havia na altura?

GA: Sabe… a, a informação que havia relativamente aos pedófilos era apenas e só que eram pedófilos e pessoas que estavam próximas de, do aldeamento e como o próprio José Alberto disse são às centenas e não é possível estar a investigar pormenorizadamente cada um. Avançar mais, eu recordo-me que, por exemplo, nós chegámos até Albufeira… Albufeira e Tavira e por aí fora, e que as investigações não se conseguem fazer assim dessa forma…

JAC: Gonçalo Amaral, mas espere aí, esta violação desta turista americana…

GA: …e repare, e repare, se…

JAC: …foi dois anos antes do desaparecimento de Madeleine…

GA: …e se… diga?

JAC: A violação da turista americana, de 72 anos, eu disse de 75…

GA: Quando é que foi comunicada em termos à PJ? 

JAC: Quando é que foi? 

GA: Não sei… (silêncio)

JAC: Não... não sei…

GA: Eu não tinha conhecimento dela na altura.

JAC: Não houve… não, a se… a senhora fez uma queixa…

GA: Nós, por exemplo eu posso-lhe dizer…

JAC: …a senhora fez uma queixa…

GA: Aonde?

JAC: (…)

GA: Quando?

JAC: (…)

GA: É, em termos da PJ, em termos de saber… e se estamos à procura dum pedófilo…

JAC: Porque este homem…

GA: …ou estamos à procura dum, dum, dum violador duma pessoa adulta?

JAC: Não, não, não… com certeza…

GA: Eu recordo…

JAC: …mas é que ocorreu dois, dois anos antes e ele, ele está agora detido na prisão alemã, exactamente a cumprir pena, por este crime… é este o crime que o conduziu neste momento à, à prisão. E foi depois possível…

GA: E foi identificado muito mais tarde…

JAC: Foi identificado em 2018…

GA: Ora… aí está, portanto em 2007 não estava identificado.

JAC: …com base em 2 evidências… com base em duas evidências essenciais….

GA: Em 2007 não estava identificado.

JAC: …mas há um cabelo que foi encontrado na cama da vítima…

GA: Sim…

JAC: …vítima da violação que foi preservado e que permitiu agora actualizar e fazer o match, fazer a…

GA: Sim. Mas isso é outra investigação, não a investigação do…

JAC: Com certeza.

GA: …do caso Maddie, é outra investigação...

JAC: Mas acontece que este homem, que se manteve no Algarve e naquela região durante algum tempo, é a assim que se exp(lica)… é assim que, que eu procuro entender, as fotografias que foram divulgadas pela polícia alemã sobre as casas, os locais, os veículos, etc… e eu gostava também de o ouvir sobre isso, sobre, sobre estas… este exercício da polícia alemã que é apelar à memória de alguém com alguns detalhes muito… não sei se são subtis, não… mas, enfim, com alguns detalhes e, e… as fotografias dizem-lhe alguma coisa, por exemplo, seja das casas, seja dos veículos que a polícia alemã revelou?

GA: Eu penso que o apelo serve o que serve, porque por exemplo a autocaravana foi retirada, foi levada de Portugal para a Alemanha para ser examinada, portanto a partir dali…

JAC: Uma autocaravana VW Westfalia, branca e amarela…

GA: …e o que era importante era que, tentar perceber porque é que… aquelas imagens que são passadas e que foram passadas…

JAC: Estas?

GA: …foram alteradas.

JAC: Estas? Estas são as imagens que eu recolhi ainda ontem, do site da polícia alemã…

GA: Eu posso-lhe mostrar…

JAC: … da BKA.

GA: Eu posso-lhe mostrar a… uma fotografia, que é a fotografia da viatura com que esse suspeito andava, e andaria em 2007, segundo a própria polícia alemã, e que é totalmente diferente daquilo que nos têm mostrado…

JAC: É esse o veículo?

GA: É este o veículo. E se reparar na fotografia que está aí a passar na imagem…

JAC: Mas o veículo não é igual!

GA: É igual, é.

JAC: É?

GA: Se reparar na fotografia, se tiver uma outra fotografia da…

JAC: Temos.

GA: …traseira da viatura…

JAC: Penso que sim… eu…eu…estive a reunir… é esta, esta?

GA: Se reparar, pode ver que ali naquela imagem há ali dois pormenores, primeiro foi tapado a… nota-se que falta ali uma cor, está ali um preto no meio e tem um novo logótipo ao lado direito. Depois tem a chapa de matrícula…

JAC: Vou deixar ampliar um bocadinho a imagem…

GA: …a chapa de matrícula, tapada, e tem a letra “D”, a matrícula é portuguesa.

JAC: Pois o carro era…

GA: O carro é de 82 e foi registado em Portugal em 2004. Se quiser pode ficar com a fotografia.

JAC: Portanto, o que está a dizer é que este…

GA: Relativamente à mesma fot… à mesma viatura…

JAC: Esta fotografia é de quando, tem ideia?

GA: Essa fotografia? Essa fotografia é do ano passado.

JAC: Esta é do ano passado?

GA: É do ano passado, portanto pretende-se é saber que, e tem aqui outra fotografia...

JAC: Ou seja, ou seja… mas o ano passado aquela carrinha que nós estávamos a ver nas imagens já estava na Alemanha, ou não?

GA: Terá saído de Portugal no ano passado para a Alemanha.

JAC: E esta fotografia foi tirada em Portugal ou na Alemanha?

GA: Em Portugal.

JAC: Hmm.

GA: Esta é outra fotografia da mesma viatura.

JAC: Com licença...

GA: Agora o que se pergunta, o que se pergunta, o quê?

JAC: Ou seja, o que é que está a dizer com isto?

GA: O que é que eu estou a dizer? É evidente.

JAC: É que a, a carrinha que foi mostrada na…

GA: ...a, a, a foto da autocaravana está completamente diferente.

JAC: Não, esta auto… não é a mesma autocaravana.

GA: Essa é mesma autocaravana.

JAC: Hmm.

GA: Essa é mesma autocaravana, e foi a autocaravana que foi levada daqui para a Alemanha, para ser examinada onde… e servia cá como depósito de figos e alfarroba.

JAC: Hmm, hmm.

GA: E, apareceu… aparece então essa imagem sem essa personalização, digamos assim…

JAC: Destes bonecos?

GA: Sim, sem esses bonecos. E o que se pergunta é isto, será que essa viatura passaria despercebida na Praia da Luz, noutra localidade qualquer ou não? Seguramente que não. E o que se pergunta ainda é, há várias… o que se pergunta é, será que a… as autoridades alemãs chegaram à conclusão que na altura de 2007 a viatura não estava assim mas estava ainda pintada de branco e por aí fora? Quem lhes disse isso?

JAC: Hmmm

GA: Será que as autoridades alemãs, ou alemãs ou inglesas, não sei quem é que fez isto, seguramente não foi em Portugal, porque quem divulgou as fotografias não foram os portugueses, e aliás não têm divulgado nada relativamente ao processo, será que quem divulgou isso está a tentar checkar informação, digamos assim? Se aparece alguém a telefonar, olha eu vi a viatura no sítio tal e… esqueça que não viu nada porque a viatura era doutra forma.

JAC: Gonçalo Amaral, deixa-me perguntar-lhe a si, é possível saber mais…

GA: Portanto, há aqui várias versões…

JAC: …informações sobre estas fotografias, onde é que elas foram tiradas?

GA: Essas fotografias foram tiradas no Algarve.

JAC: No Alg.. certo, num sítio…

GA: Sabe que eu conheço muitas pessoas que, que…

JAC: Sim…

GA: …conhecem a zona do Algoz…

JAC: …trabalhou no Algarve durante muitos anos…

GA: …pessoas que se dedicam à apanha da laranja e outras coisas mais… portanto, são fotografias.

JAC: Hmmm…

GA: Agora, outra questão, ainda relativamente ao… ao fim, não queria estar a dominar, digamos, aqui a entrevista… há aqui uma coisa diferente neste, nesta situação toda de… do tal suspeito quase perfeito como eu lhe chamo, ao bode expiatório como se queira dizer… há aqui um dado novo, um dado que ainda não chegaram lá em termos de informação, portanto, está-se muito… largou-se a bomba, disse-se que o suspeito é parecido com um… que não é, a imagens que estão são com, com 43 anos, portanto se reparar nas minhas imagens de 2013, eu estou completamente diferente, as pessoas mudam… mas o dado novo, o dado novo, o que há, é que alguém…

JAC: Ou seja, em vez de divul… esta fotografia que está a ser divulgada é dele actual e deveria ser uma de há 13 anos, é o que está a dizer?

GA: Pois… isso (risos) era interessante. E… há aqui um dado novo. O dado novo é que as autoridades alemãs estão a pedir… estão… parece que estão a querer reexaminar todos, todos os vestígios hepáticos, biológicos… hemáticos e biológicos…

JAC: Sangue.

GA: …que tenham sido encontrados. Aonde? Esperamos nós… Aonde? Dentro do apartamento, na viatura…

JAC: Alugada…

GA: …alugada pelo casal e também na rua. Só há 3 sítios onde foram encontrados vestígios: dentro do apartamento, na rua, onde há sangue, onde foram recolhidos esses vestígios, e dentro da viatura do casal alugada não sei quantos dias depois, já não me recordo. E este é que é o dado novo. E esta é que é a grande questão: será que as autoridades alemãs pensam resolver o caso, quando… eu até pensei que fosse uma tradução errada quando um… um dirigente da polícia alemã diz que a criança pode ter sido alvejada dentro do apartamento… Isto quer dizer o quê? Que houve sangue. E de facto foi… foram os cães, os tais cães… alguém dizia aí… um advogado ligado ao casal dizia que a nossa investigação, aquilo que estava no meu livro que no fundo é a nossa investigação naqueles 4 meses, não foram 13 anos, nem 13 meses, foram 4 meses… que a nossa investigação tinha sido uma fantasia, uma fábula… mas sabe que foram utilizados cães, cães mandados pelos ingleses e sugeridos pelos ingleses, porque eles é que sugeriam uma morte…

JAC: Sim…

GA: Uma morte, pior, nós falamos e…

JAC: Eu lembro-me dessas imagens, os cães identificaram o cheiro de sangue…

GA: … sempre falámos em acidente e os ingleses falam em homicídio. Não somos nós. São eles que falam em homicídio. Nós falamos em acidente. Isto está documentado. E, esse tal alvejamento produz sangue. Nós… no exame que foi realizado no local não foi encontrado nenhum vestígio de nenhum alvejamento, nem a criança que vai ao colo tem sinais de ter sido alvejada, o que tem é que vai a dormir profundamente, isto dizem as pessoas que por ali passaram.

JAC: Parecia ir a dormir profundamente.

GA: Parece que ía a dormir profundamente. E portanto isto são os dados, é que os cães que fizeram estas marcações e estas marcações foram feitas pelos cães, os vestígios que foram recolhidos com a ajuda desses cães, da tal fábula, são os tais que a polícia alemã quer analisar. Quando se fala da saliva…

JAC: Gonçalo Amaral, deixe-me só tentar, deixe-me só tentar perceber uma coisa…

GA: Só, só para acabar esta questão dos vestígios., quando se fala da saliva na cama da, da Maddie, é mentira, que não estava na cama da Maddie, é na cama junto à janela, e a saliva o que é, é uma mistura de saliva de bebé com leite materno… e que foram identificadas, a mãe e que foram identificadas as pessoas que estiveram naquele apartamento.

JAC: Antes dos McCann?

GA: Antes dos McCann. E, e portanto há que esperar…

JAC: Gonçalo Amaral, só me resta 1 minuto…

GA: …para perceber no que isto vai dar…

JAC: …só temos aqui 1 minuto, eu gostava, eu gostava muito de prolongar esta conversa mas infelizmente não vai ser possível. Estamos aqui… qual é que poderá ser o interesse da polícia alemã em deixar-se seduzir, na sua opinião pelo aquilo que acabou de expor, perante um, um… uma pista que não leva a lado nenhum na sua opinião?

GA: Leva. Leva as autoridades alemãs terem competência para investigar o caso.

JAC: E têm?

GA: Se tiverem um suspeito alemão, há quem diga que sim, há quem diga que não, o processo está cá…

JAC: Isso pode ser bom ou mau para a descoberta da verdade material?

GA: Eu penso que a polícia… as autoridades portuguesas e as polícias portuguesas podem fazer cá, os nossos laboratórios, aquilo que os alemães querem fazer lá. Não havia necessidade de deixar ir para a Alemanha outra vez…

JAC: Já foi.

GA: Já foi, já foi no ano passado, outra vez algo para ser examinado, poderia ter sido cá examinado. Já tinha acontecido isso, que é um erro quando foi…

JAC: Deixe-me repetir esta pergunta porque parece que pode ser interessante a sua resposta, o facto de ser a polícia alemã a, a conduzir a investigação agora, a partir disto, deste pretexto que é o que depreendo das suas palavras…

GA: A polícia alemã conduz a investigação lá na Alemanha…

JAC: Mas isso pode ser bom?

GA: …porque aqui quem conduz a investigação é a PJ.

JAC: A pergunta é, isso pode ser bom e, e relevante, ou não para a descoberta de provas que possam explicar o que é que aconteceu naquele dia? Em mais (imperceptível)…

GA: Hoje em dia há novas técnicas para, para analisar e, e… para… e até reanalisar aquilo que foi examinado. Se existir remanescente suficiente para, é possível chegar a outras conclusões. Eu recordo que na viatura alugada pelo casal há cabelos que foram devolvidos que dizem que pela coloração é da menina desaparecida, mas como não tem raiz, não conseguem aprofu… apurar o ADN. Sabe-se que há laboratórios que conseguem fazer isso…

JAC: Agora…

GA: …portanto os alemães que têm dinheiro podem facilmente resolver esse mistério.

JAC: Gonçalo Amaral, tinha muito mais perguntas para lhe fazer…

GA: E eu muito mais coisas para dizer.

JAC: Agradeço a sua disponibilidade, seguramente que isto vai estar nas próximas horas nos media internacionais, não é? Na Alemanha, na Inglaterra, sobre que carrinha é esta afinal…

GA: Aquela que apresentaram.

JAC: Sim, certo, certo, certo, não temos nenhuma… não, não há nenhuma fotografia das autoridades alemãs com as… um indício da chapa da matrícula, que poderia ser… ajudar a perceber melhor…

GA: Isso pode ter sido uma técnica. É a mesma.

JAC: Sim, mas tem a certeza que é a mesma?

GA: Ai, é a mesma!

JAC: Esta é a mesma que foi mostrada , só que não é a mesma porque ela estava assim e agora está doutra maneira. Gonçalo Amaral, muito obrigado, pela, pela… pelo contributo que acabou por, por, por dar aqui. Perante este caso que continua a apaixonar e dividir opiniões de muita gente até que se consiga finalmente encerrar, se é que alguma vez isso vai ser possível. Acredita que vai ser possível?

GA: Há um colega meu com quem almocei há pouco tempo que diz que sim, e eu acredito nele, portanto que… que muita coisa ainda vai acontecer. Portanto vamos esperar…

JAC: Muito obrigado, vamos ter de ficar mesmo por aqui…

GA: Pode é demorar mais 13 anos e aí já não sei se cá ando…

JAC: Enfim sim, seria muito, muito prolongado mesmo. Muito obrigado Gonçalo Amaral uma vez mais.

24 comments:

  1. To the Textusa Sisters. Just a shout out and acknowledgement for the time and effort put in for the transcribing of this interview. If anyone solves this, it will be you. :) Thanks so much for your continuing hard work. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. From the Q&A's.

    JAC: This is the same one that was shown, but it is not the same because it was like that and now it is in another way. Gonçalo Amaral, thank you very much, for, for… for the contribution you ended up giving here. In the face of this case that continues to impassion and divide the opinions of many people until it is finally closed, if ever that will be possible. Do you believe it will be possible?

    GA: There is a colleague of mine with whom I had lunch recently who says yes, and I believe him, that… that a lot is still going to happen. So let's wait...


    Amaral seems close to someone who is party to the investigation,good for him,the truth will out.

    This German could well be an important witness to events of the night of 3/05/2007.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon,

      We are indeed reminded of Euclides Monteiro, aren't we?
      http://textusa.blogspot.com/2014/05/person-of-interest.html

      Delete
  3. Amaral seems to know more than he's saying. But he came to the interview well armed... The camper-van makeover is very strange, especially if it's the same van. When did the makeover happen, and by whose hand? Finally, Germans doing forensic re-tests in Germany -- what's that about?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Any thoughts on this coming up?

    Ex-PJ inspector tells everything to Jornal do Centro

    https://jornaldocentro.pt/online/sociedade/exclusivo-goncalo-amaral-traz-novas-revelacoes-do-caso-maddie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon,

      Have watched the show. It’s 1H10 minutes long. First impressions, I would say these jumped up:

      - Links Tannerman to Smithman, stating they are the same man, and says that Jane Tanner saw a man she knew. Ridicules the Totman episode, saying very clearly that it was something done by the Scotland Yard to remove (the word used in Portuguese was “retirar”) Jane Tanner’s statement about Tannerman.

      - Speaks of the woman in purple who he says is Jane Tanner. These are 2 posts where we mentioned the woman in purple:
      http://textusa.blogspot.com/2017/05/woman-in-purple.html
      http://textusa.blogspot.com/2017/11/fat-shaming.html

      - Shows a 2006 picture of Brueckner and then with the aid of photoshopping adds long hair, because he says there are witnesses that say that in 2007 Brueckner used long hair, looked like a hippie, which makes him an obvious non-candidate for both Tannerman and Smithman prizes.

      - Hits the FSS. Says the report is anything but scientific and is basically an opinion of whoever signed, pointing out that the same person who says the DNA was made up by Gerry McCanns family, cannot be then Maddie’s (paraphrasing but that was the idea).

      - Says that the investigation should be in Portugal and nothing should be sent anywhere because who knows what may happen.

      Delete
    2. Interesting about Tannerman,he's never said that before has he? mind could be he's right,Tanner saw someone and it wasn't an abductor.

      Delete
  5. We have now added to the post the YouTube video from Joana Morais with the entirety of the interview:

    https://youtu.be/nVtExYJmmPo

    ReplyDelete
  6. One technical question:

    If the rape of the 72 yr-old took place in Praia da Luz and taking as truthful all that has been said about it, that it happened in Luz in 2005, that there was no complaint filed in the PJ, that he was prosecuted for this crime in Germany in 2018 and that there was a hair retrieved in the scene of the crime; then, who retrieved that hair? When and under what jurisdiction?

    ReplyDelete
  7. In our opinion, there is something that we feel we should point out and that is the message sent by some Portuguese, via Gonçalo Amaral, to the UK and Germany.

    The Portuguese are the PJ officers. Not the PJ itself but those honourable men and women who are tired of seeing their work being slandered and their image being eroded in the political games of this case for 13 years.

    It is clear that Amaral was prepared for this. He said so himself a year ago. But also is clear now is that “people” have closed ranks around to protect him (and the PJ’s work). That’s what those photos represent to us.

    The falsity used and the shamelessness shown in the countless manoeuvres throughout the years, makes this just something, to quote Rogério Alves “um mau costume, um mau costume” (a bad habit, a bad habit). If on the one hand the “minion-van” photos were surprising, on the other one got that bitter sensation of more of the same in terms of yet another blatant lie.

    Whatever objective was intended to be achieved with the van manoeuvre – and we’re not here to judge it and continue to keep to ourselves our opinions on that – it’s undeniable that the pictures shown by Amaral were not supposed to have been taken.

    Him showing them as a message in itself. It shouted across the borders that the PJ workers are not up to be shown incompetent. Note, we are not implying that it was active duty PJ officers who took those photos. In fact, taking into account the political sensitivity of the case, we are certain that those pictures were taken by whoever COULD take them with breaking the law in any way.

    And that is, for us, the main message those photos contained: hey, politicians, you want to play games? We can’t stop you, we would if we could but we can’t but be warned, do NOT attempt to cross the line and lie about the PJ, that is not acceptable, we will fight back with the truth, if the Brit police is willing to lie, that’s up to them, we, the Portuguese, will have none of that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So willing to save their own skin are they that they care not how they continually traduce Madeleine's name by associating her with every sicko and debauched act on the planet.

      Delete
  8. The fount of all Knowledge, The Sun, have now announced that the prosecutors, so not just Wolter, have declared that there's no 'concrete evidence' against the German criminal scapegoat.

    Quelle surprise!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Correction, despite 'concrete evidence' are the exact words, but the gist is still the same - in short, it's just more deliberate nonsense. The entire story line was exactly that. Who are the worst culprits shaping this grotesquely insulting affair anyways?

    Kate and Gerry? LOL!!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Just thinking, if Kate and Gerald ever did decide to get the monkey of their back and tell the truth, they could turn British politics on its head. And that's just for starters. Someone, somewhere, has seriously misjudged the sensibilities of the CPS. It's the truth people want, not a public execution.

    ReplyDelete
  11. https://www.portugalresident.com/madeleine-mccann-and-the-media/

    If anything had happened in PdL in 2005, surely Len Port would have known?

    A pity no interviewer has asked GA about this incident and whether it was known to PJ. He has only said clearly that Brueckner was not accused of it but hasn't said anything about the incident itself or how the hair was collected.


    Nobody asked him about the 2 phone calls either.

    OG still have the same request for information as posted on June 4. Seems they are completely out of the loop!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Victoria is no longer on the throne but the one-horse town demographic don't get it yet. Try being banged up in a Cuban prison for talking to a friend in a bar and see how far a British passport gets you. You'll be lucky to have water after two days, this really happened and only an American passport afforded release.

      The colonial leftovers are still living in the past...and are protecting themselves...only. Make no mistake about that.

      Delete
  12. https://twitter.com/JoanaAMorais/status/1276536647572770816
    Joana (A of Antifa) Morais@JoanaAMorais
    Gonçalo Amaral entrevistado por José Alberto Carvalho na TVI24 https://youtu.be/nVtExYJmmPo
    English translation http://textusa.blogspot.com/2020/06/goncalo-amaral-jornal-das-8-tvi-june-21.html… and http://textusa.blogspot.com/2020/06/goncalo-amaral-jornal-das-8-tvi-june-21_24.html… #McCann
    4:23 PM · Jun 26, 2020·

    *****

    Thank you Joana 😊

    ReplyDelete
  13. https://www.portugalresident.com/what-kidnap-maddie-detective-gives-interview-as-mainstream-warns-investigation-could-be-dropped-if-missing-evidence-isnt-found/

    Natasha Donn's article

    ReplyDelete
  14. To complete the humiliation:

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/uknews/11952626/madeleine-mccann-suspect-may-not-be-charged-german/

    “NO CHARGE
    Madeleine McCann suspect may NOT be charged admit German prosecutors despite ‘concrete evidence’”

    Written by the “Antonella-in-trousers”, Nick Pisa…

    Concrete evidence? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    “And German prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters previously told The Sun they had "concrete evidence" that Madeleine was dead” and “But now in an astonishing U-turn Mr Wolters has told a local newspaper: ''You also have to be realistic enough that the investigation may not lead to a charge for the murder of Madeleine McCann. It could be stopped if we fail to find the missing evidence."”

    So, if evidence is missing how can it be concrete? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    Now that this “Last Cry Wolf Suspect” turkey is being stuffed even though Thanksgiving is in November and Christmas in December, it may be the time to start to do, as the Portuguese say, the accountancy of this pathetic circus: winners v losers, objectives intended v objectives achieved, etc…

    ReplyDelete
  15. Is Wolters actually for real though? It's all too redolent of the atrocious ham acting we've seen before. Who told him, or why did he to say: "concrete evidence?" as he sounded like someone stumbling over his lines to me. Where has Wolters been getting his data and non-data (in actuality), from?

    ReplyDelete
  16. The Sun has another new article out, it actually mentions Martin Smith, he seems to be sticking to his original claim of the sleeping child sighting. However he's made it clear that it wasn't C.B. he saw. Telling the truth and not involving the public in this mess would have been oh so much easier.

    ReplyDelete
  17. We inform readers that our post has been updated as our good friend has had the kindness of replacing the various "imperceptibles" with what was actually said.

    Once again, our gratefulness!

    ReplyDelete
  18. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11964573/madeleine-mccann-witness-christian-b/amp/

    Martin Smith doesn’t recognise CB as the man he saw.

    Why didn’t German police speak to him?

    ReplyDelete
  19. So many of these 'professional' law enforcement bods, of whatever rank, it doesn't matter in this case. Are consistently not adhering to the fundamentals of policing 101. They are not following their ABC's ... Assume nothing. Believe nobody. Check everything. I'll give them 0 out of 3 for effort and imagination.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Textusa