Wednesday 17 June 2020

Correio da Manhã, June 17 2020 - Paper edition


Our translation:

*****
Page 23


EVIDENCE

GERMANS REQUEST THE PROCESS AND WANT TO TRY CHRISTIAN BRUECKNER

Suspicions – They don’t reveal the new data coming to the Maddie investigation in the last weeks

Searches - PJ will go to the field if there are concrete places to search for the girl's body

Tânia Laranjo

The Germans want to try Christian Brueckner, the suspect for the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. They have already asked for all the elements from the Portuguese authorities and intend to make use of German law, which allows the judgment of national citizens, even if the crimes were committed in other countries.

For this reason, the alleged vestige of DNA that will have been found in the house from where the girl disappeared - and that the CM knows that it will hardly have any identifying value - has already been asked to the Portuguese authorities. The Germans have heard other witnesses and have been keeping all the clues they have received in the last weeks - after the suspicions against the German were made public.

At this moment, the CM knows, the authorities are at an impasse. The PJ, which is also competent to investigate the case, will only return to the field if the Germans indicate concrete places where Maddie's body may be hidden. The searches may focus on wells and holes, but the PJ is waiting for the German investigation to reveal some new clue, since what exists in Portugal is insufficient to proceed with searches.

Also in the van that was apprehended in Lagos and sent to Germany to be subject to expertise, nothing relevant was found. There was no indication of the English girl, who disappeared on May 3, 2007, in Praia da Luz. The same happened in the house where Christian Brueckner lived, but which he left still in 2007. For now, the suspect, detained in a prison in Kiel, was still not heard by the German authorities.

EXCLUSIVE NEWS
PAPER EDITION

Insert: PORTUGAL WAS ASKED FOR THE ALLEGED VESTIGE FOUND IN THE HOUSE

*****


Criticism creates tension

The German prosecutor in charge of the case Hans Christian Wolters, launched some criticisms of the actions of the Portuguese authorities saying that they “still think that Maddie's parents are responsible for the disappearance” and they have lengthy procedures.

*****


Germany believes

It is difficult to know what the next steps of the investigation will be, but the German authorities show that they will not drop the matter, even if the main suspect refuses to speak or give any clue. The prosecutor in the case believes there will be answers soon.

***** 
 Pages 24 and 25



PORTUGUESE INVESTIGATION

05/03/2007

The McCann couple was having dinner with friends at the tourist resort Ocean Club, in Praia da Luz. The children - Maddie, 3, Sean and Amelie, 2 - stayed in their room, about 50 meters from the restaurant. Close to 10 pm, Kate heads to the apartment and gives the alert for the disappearance of her eldest daughter. The GNR is called and, shortly after, the PJ is activated. Searches are carried out on the grounds around the resort for several days (they ended on May 11). The parents are heard by the PJ and make a public appeal for the girl's restitution.

Caption: Maddie disappeared from the room of the Ocean Club resort


*****


09/08/2007

Maddie's parents were constituted arguidos after being questioned at the PJ in Portimão - Kate was heard for five hours and Gerry for nine. The confirmation was made by the lawyer representing the McCanns, Carlos Pinto de Abreu, explaining that “no charges have been filed against them and the investigation is continuing”. The couple was given the measure of caution of term of identity and residence, having complete freedom to, on the following day, return home. Back in May, the Englishman Robert Murat had been constituted arguido in the case, but ended up cleared.

Caption: Kate and Gerry were interrogated at the PJ in Portimão

*****


09/09/2007

Kate and Gerry returned to the UK, after months of diligences without any result and numerous clues that proved to be false, including some that guaranteed the sighting of Maddie in various locations in Spain. Weeks earlier, Scotland Yard made available two dogs capable of smelling the odour of death. The animals signalled the presence of a cadaver in three locations: in the room where the girl slept, at the Ocean Club, in the garden of the tourist resort and inside the trunk of the car used by the McCann days after the disappearance.

Caption: Dogs detected cadaver odour in the car used by the couple

*****


7/21/2008

The Public Ministry archives the case “because no evidence of a crime has been obtained”. Thus, Kate and Gerry have also ceased to be arguidos in the process. The couple continues to make appeals for Maddie to be found, asking British tourists to spread the photo of the girl on their vacation locations. In the years that followed, Maddie's parents became involved in a war with former PJ inspector Gonçalo Amaral, who wrote a book where he points towards the girl's accidental death. In October 2013, the case is reopened, coinciding with the Brueckner investigation.

Caption: More than a year later the case was archived 

*****


13 YEARS WITHOUT MADDIE

SEARCHES
All attempts to find Maddie have failed. Germans say they have the key to the mystery


CLÁUDIA MACHADO/PAULO J. SANTOS

It was not for lack of commitment that the Portuguese authorities have not, until today, discovered the whereabouts of Madeleine McCann. The disappearance began to be treated as an abduction. Hence the requested collaboration of the Portuguese and British secret services and the intervention of Interpol. Without abandoning this line of investigation, the hypothesis of the child's death, accidental or provoked, also gained strength, especially since the tracking dogs from England detected odour of cadaver and blood in the McCann's holiday home, in the car used by the couple, on a flowerbed of the backyard, in Kate's clothes and on the child's cuddle cat.

But everything came to nothing. Until the Germans came into action, when they realized that their compatriot Christian Brueckner, who lived in Portugal between 1995 and 2007, was mentioned in several investigations related to the disappearance of children. For the German authorities there is no doubt: it was him.


Caption of background photo: Madeleine McCann disappeared days from completing 4 years

Caption: 1 - Kate gave the alert for the disappearance 2 - Gerry was accused, as well as his wife


*****


GERMAN INVESTIGATION

11/04/2013

Christian Brueckner, a German with a record who lived near Praia da Luz, in Lagos, at the time of Maddie's disappearance, has been investigated since October 2013, after an old colleague thought he looked like an e-fit. On November 4, 2013, he received a summons from the German police to be heard as a witness, but the authorities let the motive for the summons in the note. Brueckner, 43, knew he was going to become a suspect of the abduction of the English girl even before the investigation started. He managed to escape the interrogation.

Caption: Christian Brueckner, 43, is the prime suspect

*****


06/03/2020

German police reveals that Brueckner, in custody in the country for drug trafficking, is now the main suspect in Maddie's abduction and death. Among the clues already collected, there are several photographs of houses where the sexual predator passed in the Algarve region, including the one where he lived at the time of the crime, in an isolated area and a short distance from Praia da Luz. Images of a fireplace and a sofa, inside the residence were released. In a few days, details of the man's record emerged, including sexual crimes against minors.

Caption: House where the suspect lived is on the radar of German police

*****


06/05/2020

The main facts that associate Brueckner to the abduction of the English girl are beginning to be revealed. A call received by the German puts him in Praia da Luz when Maddie disappeared. The authorities release the phone numbers, hoping to find the person who called the man with a record, considered a fundamental witness. The vehicles he was driving at the time were also recovered and subjected to expertise. It is also discovered that on May 3, 2017, Brueckner said to a friend that he knew "everything that happened to Maddie".

Caption: VW motorhome Brueckner drove

*****


6/12/2020

Hans Christian Wolters, the prosecutor in charge of the case, says there are clues of Maddie's death, but ends up taking a step back and assuming that it is just the obvious conclusion in cases with sexual predators. The magistrate also stresses that the parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, are innocent and criticizes the Portuguese police. Meanwhile, Brueckner's ex-girlfriend reveals that, on the eve of the child's disappearance, the man told her that he was going to “do a terrible thing in Praia da Luz”, that he was going to “change” his life and would make him disappear during a while.

Caption: Hans Christian Wolters says there are signs of death

*****
Page 26




SUSPICIONS

Kate's silence about Madeleine's DNA

DOUBTS - Casal McCann was suspect of the eldest daughter's disappearance. They were questioned by the PJ QUESTIONS - Maddie's mother remained in silence when she was constituted arguido

PAULO JOÃO SANTOS

The investigation into the Maddie case took a 180-degree turn when the spotlight centred on the child's parents, over whom then fell the guilt for the English girl's disappearance. The constitution of arguidos for Kate and Gerry McCann was based on a set of facts and circumstances, which, for the investigation, were solid enough to point the finger at the couple.

Right away, the behaviour of the dogs, who detected cadaver and blood odours in the McCann car and holiday home.

On September 7, 2007, four months after the disappearance, Kate was called to the PJ of Portimão to clarify some loose ends in the case, but no light was shone as to what happened. Maddie's mother, who had up until then collaborated with the police, chose to be silent when she was constituted arguida. Of the tens of questions that remained unanswered, three referred to Maddie's DNA found in the car rented by the couple, a month after the girl's disappearance:

- Signalled [by the sniffer dogs] the odour of cadaver coming from the car they rented a month after [Maddie's] disappearance, said she can't explain anything more than she has already referred?

- Signalled the human blood in the trunk of the vehicle, said she can't explain anything more than she has already referred?

- Faced with the result of Maddie's DNA collected, whose analysis was carried out by a British laboratory [the public institute Forensic Science Service], behind the sofa and the trunk of the vehicle, said she can't explain anything more than she has already referred?

Two days after Kate's presence at the PJ in Portimão, where a small crowd of curious onlookers gathered and booed and whistled upon arrival, the couple and their twin daughters [sic] left for England, with no sign of Maddie.

Inserts:

GIRL'S MOTHER REFUSED TO ANSWER ABOUT ODOUR OF CADAVER IN CAR

AUTHORITIES WANTED JUSTIFICATION FOR MADDIE'S DNA IN THE TRUNK

Caption: Kate was even constituted arguido in the case of the disappearance of her daughter

*****


MADDIE'S DISAPPEARANCE MOBILIZES CATHOLIC CHURCH AND THE FAMOUS

MCCANN COUPLE WAS RECEIVED, AT S. PEDRO SQUARE, IN VATICAN, BY THE POPE BENEDICT XVI, ON MAY 30, 2007. THE POPE BLESSED A PHOTO OF MADDIE

DAVID BECKHAM
, EX-PLAYER, MADE AN APPEAL ON VIDEO TO FIND MADDIE. ALSO CR7, WHO AT THE TIME PLAYED IN ENGLAND, ALERTED TO THE CASE

*****

Man with record is the main suspect

Christian Brueckner, 43, is the main suspect in Maddie's abduction and murder and has a long record, which started as a teenager. In addition to sexual crimes against minors, he was sentenced to 7 years in prison for raping a 72-year-old woman in Praia da Luz and a year and a half for drug trafficking.

Caption: Brueckner is 43 years old

*****


INVESTIGATION HAS COST 14 MILLION EUROS

Operation Grange, the name given by the British police to the process of Maddie’s disappearance, has already cost the UK more than 14 million euros, without any practical results. There is a fixed team to investigate the case.

*****

Witness sees figure with child

A witness assured the authorities of having seen a figure with a child on his lap in the space of time that the child disappeared while the parents dined at a nearby restaurant. From the account, however, it was not possible to reach any conclusion. Today it is admitted that the figure in question was Brueckner.

Caption: Witness reported abduction

48 comments:

  1. Who directed the Germans to look into this hideous patsy in the first place? The Germans didn't just spring into action out of thin air. Could it be Operation Grunge? Or, Operation Grunge?

    If Portugal loses their unyielding stance on this whole heap of carnival trickery, they are surrendering to their inferiors. My gut feeling tells me Portugal won't roll over twice.

    Know your history, British traitors and leaders of the McCann media sponsored scam.



    ReplyDelete
  2. I wish Germany would get on with it and take him to court. Then we’d see what evidence his lawyers would dispute and which witnesses would be called.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If the current suspect is charged with “murder" how will the McCanns feel that someone else has been charged with something he is innocent of? Will that remove their guilt ? No. The guilt will remain with them until the end of their time. "The temptation to shout the truth from the rooftops has always been there" Kate once said. And…… “ I have had to keep saying to myself, I know the truth, we know the truth and God knows the truth and one day, the truth will out “ They have had plenty of opportunity over 13 years to do this, especially now. We all know she is not a "live findable child" anymore. My opinion, is that Britain want the case wrapped up now - and forgotten about - but even if the German was charged, that will only fuel the fire even more. Poor wee Maddie. Where are you in all this :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Speaking loudly. All one has to do is listen and look in the right place. Sean and Amelie had it sussed when they were two.

      Sweet Madeleine has never been missing, and even Kate's inherent truth couldn't be hidden completely as was exemplified when she appeared in a photo with a sign specifying one word only: 'Illusion'..

      Crying out to be heard, ALWAYS!

      Delete
  4. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11890219/germany-portugal-cops-war-dna-evidence-madeleine-mccann/

    “WAR ON 'DNA KEY'
    Madeleine McCann cops in Portugal ‘refuse to hand over’ DNA evidence to German police that could lead to breakthrough”

    (…)

    “German cops want to retest a tiny sample of saliva found on a piece of cloth on the missing girl’s bedspread.”

    *****

    Idiots who are holding on to this as if it is the key to pin CB to a cross, are not exactly realising that they are helping Germany to call the UK – not Portugal – incompetent, not to say liars.

    And, we’re not only talking about social media fools:

    https://news.sky.com/story/madeleine-mccann-german-police-want-to-retest-mystery-saliva-sample-12008482

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/17/saliva-madeleine-mccanns-bed-should-re-tested-say-german-prosecutors/

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8433555/Portuguese-police-blast-Madeleine-McCann-officers-Germany-arrogant.html

    And why is Germany calling the UK – not Portugal – incompetent, not to say liars?

    Because the saliva sample in question was tested by the FSS and it identified to whom it belonged to:

    http://textusa.blogspot.com/2011/11/mystery-of-profile-l.html

    http://textusa.blogspot.com/2013/08/super-kid.html

    To require the retesting only means that the FSS results are not trusted.

    To say that DNA testing today is much more advanced than it was then is ridiculous. A statement was made then, a statement with legal value.

    The fact that science does advance daily, and DNA testing with it, only means what could not be identified then can be today, and what cannot be today will be tomorrow. However, what is stated today, has to be said with the degree of certainty that the responsibility encapsulates, that no advancement that is going to happen will be able to deny.

    If now, it was “found” that the sample does not belong to the person the FSS said it did, one can easily understand the legal repercussions that would result from it.

    But this raises an interesting question. The files – which are public so it only makes sense for Germany to request the redacted part – state clearly that samples were sent to the UK, where they were tested and then DESTROYED.

    So why is Germany requesting Portugal for it?

    Does that mean that biological samples were sent to the UK but Portugal kept – and NOT DESTROYED – the materials from where the samples sent were taken from?

    Note, we are not saying this is the case. This is a Wag the Dog scenario, so any intersection between what is going on and the truth is simply a mere coincidence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/P9/09_VOLUME_IXa_Page_2282.jpg

      It clearly states that all saliva samples were destroyed.

      Germany is asking for the retesting of a sample that was matched by the FSS to the “Super-kid” and that no longer exists

      Note, for something to be retested it needs to have been tested first and that means that said sample that Germany is now asking for, MUST be in the files.

      If we’re incorrect we ask those correcting us to direct us to the evidence in the files, very much like we have done with these comments.

      We’re sure there is digital evidence of the tests, as there is for Maddie’s DNA profile in the files.

      There must be a digital record of “Super-kid’s” DNA on file, and probably of his father, who claimed to have cut himself shaving.

      Delete
    2. Maddie's DNA profile in the files? I wouldn't trust the validity of that with a ten foot pole, I don't trust any of the British contingent. Not one of them, not even the ones much of the internet have been fooled by ever since they captured their hearts and minds with a wholly disingenuous assault on the visual and emotive senses.

      The entire affair is infested with leeches and liars, Madeleine would be oh so proud of the big brave adults feeding at the trough of inhuman depravity.

      But of course this pantomime is all about Kate, Gerald and Madeleine.

      But of course it is.

      Frit of being caught and exposed more like, and then there will be the strong possibility of Hillsborough part 2 on steroids.

      Some people never learn, no matter how many chances you give them to redeem themselves.

      Delete
    3. The Brit Olive Press churno and johnny-come-lately entrepreneur who raced up to Luz like a bat out of hell from Spain and reached his destination in record time. The dude who made his truthful statements on the Netflix docudrivel, he will be an interesting one to watch, flow charts, financial peaks, digital footprints, the lot.

      Trust him as far as I could throw him I would not, and neither would Madeleine if she had the choice. I'm dead certain of that.

      Underestimating gullible fools!

      Delete
  5. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8431391/German-police-want-retest-mystery-saliva-McCanns-Praia-Luz-apartment.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “The claim followed conflicting earlier reports saliva taken from Madeleine's bedspread belonged to someone linked to her family and authorities had known for a 'long time' it was not the German 43-year-old's.”

      *****

      Was “Super-kid’s” family linked to the McCanns??

      Delete
    2. “Detectives believe saliva left on the three-year-old’s pillow in Praia da Luz could provide vital evidence linking serial sex offender Christian Brueckner to the youngster’s disappearance in 2007.
      But Portugal’s investigative Policia Judiciara [PJ] do not want to hand the sample over to a foreign police force, claiming it does not match Brueckner.
      (…)
      German investigators want to retest the sample of saliva that was left on youngster’s pillow in her holiday apartment to see if it is a match to the 43-year-old drifter, who lived just outside the Algarve resort at the time.
      The results of a new test could provide the break-through to one of Europe’s biggest unsolved criminal mysteries.
      But Portuguese officials say that this saliva sample has already been examined at Institute Forsenic Medicine in Coimbra and that no DNA match to new suspect Brueckner was found.”

      *****

      What sample from what pillowcase that was in 5A??

      If it’s a pillowcase they want to test, it was brought from Maddie’s bed in England. So it wasn’t there on May 3!

      Delete
    3. “A similar request by Scotland Yard was refused in 2014 when British detectives wanted to retest nearly 100 strands of hair strands that were discovered during the original investigation but never DNA-matched.”

      *****

      Was it for this that Andy Redwood visited the INML in Coimbra? Why wasn’t it mentioned at the time taking into account there were no holds barred for the circus they put in Luz??

      Delete
    4. “Portuguese police are now refusing to hand over a potentially crucial DNA sample in the Madeleine McCann case to German investigators as they dismiss the search for the missing toddler as a ‘waste of time’.
      (…)
      Officers do not believe that the German investigators have found any new evidence in the case because they have not asked for permission to carry out further searches in Portugal.
      A source close to the PJ in Lisbon told MailOnline: ‘Investigators here think this is all a waste of time. They believe there is no point looking for Madeleine’s body.
      ‘Senior members of the PJ are very reticent about this new suspect Christian Brueckner.
      ‘They are also concerned about all this new information linking Brueckner to Madeleine McCann.’
      (…)
      Senior members of the PJ maintain that their officers gathered all of the evidence back in 2007 and that anything that the German investigators can add is only circumstantial.
      The source revealed: ‘In the beginning PJ officers took 600 samples of evidence.
      ‘The Germans confirm that they have new evidence. But this is only circumstantial.’
      Another source close to the PJ investigators in Lisbon added: ‘Why have they not interviewed Brueckner yet?’
      ‘This is not a serious investigation. The Germans have not revealed their new evidence because they do not have any.’”

      *****

      Could the Portuguese position be any clearer? We don’t think so.

      Delete
    5. So, was it money? Or stupidity that made the German front man jump like a shackled servant of the British nutjobs, indeed the perforated and ultimately legless lawbreakers?

      The alliteration theme says a lot about the demographics of the phoney baloney class-imbued missing campaign.

      The missing, that never was.

      Delete
  6. https://www.fr24news.com/a/2020/06/madeleine-mccann-portuguese-police-reject-request-retest.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “We have already tried and it is insulting to be asked to do it again,” a source close to the Judiciaria Police said.
      “It is a complete waste of time. What is even worse is that now they want to do it in their labs, as if ours are not good enough. Why do they think their DNA center testing is better than ours? ’

      *****

      Really?

      Then why did the FSS do all the forensic testing in the UK and they weren’t done in Portugal? Only waking up now? Really?

      Delete
    2. https://www.fr24news.com/a/2020/06/madeleine-mccann-portuguese-police-reject-request-retest.html

      “In 2012, Scotland Yard detectives visited a Portuguese laboratory and asked them to retest the hairs found in the apartment. Their request was denied.”

      *****

      Now it was in 2012…

      Delete
    3. It's time the British nationals and Portuguese citizens started heavily monitoring every word uttered and every coin spent in this outrageously insulting affair. Forget the German nonsense, let's remember who's paying the bills and who is ultimately in charge.

      Madeleine's corpse wasn't there for them to gorge off of; yet the unscrupulous filth did. And remorselessly continue to do so. Some of them have gone radio silent, how very curious is that?

      Not.

      Delete
  7. TESTING!
    Two very important comments were swallowed up, this was happening a while back as well! Is your blog OK?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 19 Jun 2020, 02:09:00,

      We have had a friend complain that she submitted a comment a few days ago and it never arrived. However, by the number of comments we have received it seems not to be a widespread problem.

      Other than resubmitting comments that are “swallowed”, you have 2 options that you can resort to:
      - Submit a DO NOT PUBLISH message with an e-mail address, so that we can give you one to where you can send comments you wish to publish which we will then do that for you;
      - Use the Maria Santos FB profile, and leave a PM with the comment you wish to publish. https://www.facebook.com/bronte.textusa

      Delete
    2. Thank you! Much appreciated!

      Delete
  8. The Germans have evidence 'gathered over the last two years' so, not by the Portuguese then, it must have originated from the delayed pioneers at Grunge. Therefore, it has to be legit!

    If this nonsense persists, I'm afraid there's going to have to be some enlightening done when it comes to the one and only Mrs. Angela Merkel.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Check out the Facebook page of the Germanic town in question, Braunschweig, not a word of Madeleine Beth McCann or the touring multi-vehicle owning, detestable patsy. Why?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Comment we have received:

    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Correio da Manhã, June 17 2020 - Paper edition":

    The rider of the unwashed white stallion, and beacon of truth, one German prosecutor Hans Christian Wolter! OK, yeah...whatever! Computer says NO...certifiable knuckleheads!

    I'm calling BS on the whole dang fictitious story line, brought to us by the usual suspects, the Sun, Moon and Stars churnos and suckers of the public's lifeblood.

    F them to all hell! Pathetic weaklings with more debt than (censored)!!! HIMSELF!!!

    Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 19 Jun 2020, 14:46:00

    *****

    Reason for censoring: the mention of a name of a well-known very-rich individual, which could get the blog into unnecessary legal problems.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gotcha! But that individual would be very foolish to go there, all research and facts considered. It was an issue 20 years ago, and maybe goes back even further, but totally get your point in terms of choosing battles. One domino at a time, as they say.

      Delete
  11. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8439677/amp/Portuguese-police-unwittingly-destroyed-Christian-Brueckners-van-searched.html

    Another nonsensical story.

    If the van was impounded in 2006 and retained by police until destruction in 2009, what relevance does it have for the Maddie investigation?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The latest hogwash has got me thinking. There are elements that appear to be common threads in the latest mad media narrative. Such as, 2006 and concrete. Concrete evidence and no concrete evidence. What were the swingers doing in the early off-season months of 2006. Was the entertainment aspect of the Ocean Club venue also 'hosting parties' the year before? One of the jive talking nannies, claimed she'd worked there for that season, but alas, only in her 2008 interview with the British plods.

      She never mentioned it prior, strangely enough.

      Just thinking out load and wondering how many of the [;)] 'guests' had met up before! Mixing lies with truth is their signature MO. Swingers don't generally swing once, and then call it a day.

      Is it possible that 2006 made them too complacent in 2007? What's really going on?

      My view is that they're up to something crazy again, I can feel it in my bones.

      Delete
  12. Unpublished anonymous to the PREVIOUS post at 16 Jun 2020, 23:26:00 and at 17 Jun 2020, 00:42:00 and DO NOT PUBLISH at 17 Jun 2020, 04:07:00,

    We haven’t published your comments because they would make easily identifiable the “disgusting one”.

    However, in one of your comments you have written something that has intrigued us: “Why exactly did the entrapment agent go after that particular blogger?”

    To what “that particular blogger” are you referring to?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. -DO NOT PUBLISH- Anonymous at 19 Jun 2020, 19:57:00,

      Thank you for your reply.

      You will certainly understand that we cannot say anything because it would expose all the characters in question.

      We only recommend that you read this passage from this post:
      https://textusa.blogspot.com/2016/05/lions-and-settlement-of-truth.html

      “8. Walking with the lions
      The fact that one walks with the lions doesn’t mean at all one is a lion.
      When one is not a lion and walks with them, one is but a walking meal that the lions don’t even have the trouble of carrying and is just there for them to consume when they feel like it.
      Even if one is a lion among lions one has to be on permanent alert, not being one is just stupid to walk with them because of their protection.

      Yes, other predators may be dissuaded but the biggest threat is right there, a breath away.
      When the lions feel the time has come to eat, they will mercilessly rip the flesh right off the bone before one can even utter a whimper.”

      These people have no friends and are ruthless and shameless.

      Some who think they are lions, aren’t.

      One day, when it’s convenient for the lions, they will be thrown into a “grinder”. And the more noise they make, the more they will “plead”, the “gorier” will then the spectacle be, the less likely the spotlight will ever shine on the lions, so entertained the mob will be.

      Delete
    2. Not good for a bunch of amateurs to sell their souls with a no buyback policy. The real lions, tigers and bears haven't been released into the arena yet. Let's wait and see how well the likes of M.W.T can fight when he meets his biggest nemesis of his miserable little life so far - his own classless and soulless reflection, as the castle walls come crumbling down around his sorry karmic as*. Madeleine hater and all-round waste of valuable planet oxygen, so he is.

      Madeleine wouldn't waste a second of her time entertaining such characters, not in a gazillion. There isn't a single solitary one of the gang of hucksters can extinguish Madeleine's essence and truth. They can't do it, because number one, they're too ignorant, and number two, they're not even operating on the same planet. Madeleine will win, and the con artists will lose; that's how it is going to be. When the whole truth is told, it won't be all about the McCanns anymore.

      Delete
  13. They've got their latest emeritus professor displaying her truly unlikable colours on Twitter at the moment. This most recent brain of Britain sells herself as some kind of an expert criminologist, the other knuckle dragger and media parasite (no name mentioned) a well-known former Luz squatter is also on the evil eye warpath, stirring up more vicious insanity and one more throw at the dice tactics that are being observed and documented with a fine-tooth comb etc.

    They don't get it yet, but their incessant media supported bullying is no longer a source of destruction as it was back in the days of the fake Brenda Leyland [purlease, the Twitter sheep still believe that tripe!] death hoax.

    Rupes is in urgent need of accepting a piece of someone else's mind. It's just a FACT!!!!

    RGE

    ReplyDelete
  14. Just watched Sandra Felgueiras “Sexta às 9” about Maddie.

    If it’s true – and there’s nothing to state that it isn’t – that the gas released by cows farts is one of the reasons for global warming, then the planet’s temperature has gone up tonight at least 10 degrees.

    Do readers remember the 2 phone numbers that were released? One belonging to CB and the other to the “mystery fundamental witness”?

    Well, it seems the German police is not sure that either number belonged to CB and his lawyer in 2006 – for the theft of 300 litres of diesel – stated that then neither number did.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We sometimes can’t believe where this case is going and how many people involved have thrown their personal and professional ethics to the wind.

      Delete
    2. OG started this of by publishing an appeal with 2 phone numbers.
      Then the caller and recipient are named.
      Inviting all and sundry to try phoning the numbers and potentially contact 2 people who may have re-assigned numbers, or tip off a person who who may still have the number.
      Appalling behaviour by 2 police forces.

      Delete
  15. https://twitter.com/FindMadeleine/status/1274046311227105283
    FindMadeleine@FindMadeleine
    Operation Grange Statement: June 19, 2020 The Met received one letter from the BKA on 12 June, which was passed to the family. The letter did not state that there was evidence or proof that Madeleine is dead, the MPS continues to investigate Madeleine’s disappearance 1/2
    7:28 PM · Jun 19, 2020

    https://twitter.com/FindMadeleine/status/1274046482438598656
    FindMadeleine@FindMadeleine
    as a missing person investigation. No letter has been received by the Met from the German prosecutor. 2/2
    7:28 PM · Jun 19, 2020

    *****

    The McCanns say clearly that the letter received didn’t state Maddie was dead.

    ReplyDelete
  16. https://twitter.com/JoanaAMorais/status/1274090668474982400

    Joana Morais is making a thread on Twitter about the program.

    ReplyDelete
  17. If this doesn't go through it'll be the seventh attempt!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Magenta,

      Please see our comment at 19 Jun 2020, 18:54:00, replying to Anonymous 19 Jun 2020, 02:09:00.

      Delete
  18. The German prosecutor and the deceivers at Op Grge et al should all watch their backs if they don't want to wind up in major trouble, or worse - prison. No-one is above the law, no matter how well protected they think they are and how deep the CEO's pockets may be.

    Madeleine's going to win, and the no-mark shysters are going to lose, it's a given.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Just taken a swift perusal of the McCann Twitter feed, it's sad but true, there's not one of those accounts has a clue about what happened to Madeleine. Neglect, sedation, Tapas dinners, big round imaginary table, the Gaspar statements, Yvonne Warren Martin with the acting skills of my neighbour's cat Dilly, Mrs. Fenn and the crying incident, the 'staff' witness statements and on and on it goes, all total fabrications and window dressing.

    Groundhog Day is their calling, not sorting the wheat from the proverbial. The surfing sensation has got them all dancing the whirling dervish, can't wait for the grand reveal, eat your heart out Eliot Ness and Ginger Rogers, the El Supremos are coming to town....

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hi Textusa
    With the recent shenanigans, I have returned to visiting your site frequently. For a few years I focussed on other aspects of life and put Madeleine to the back of my mind as it seemed there was little chance of the truth emerging. I enjoy visiting this site as it appears to be the only place where the real truth is discussed - not the 'truth of the lie'. I used to particularly gain a lot from reading your 'case summaries' where you give an insight into the games being played and how the different sides may be thinking. I just wondered if you'd be able to soon provide a summary of how you feel things have moved on and what might be happening now with the case in terms of 'games being played'.

    I'm interested in things like Boris Johnson now being PM and the effect that might have. What the current options are for closing the case e.g. truth / partial truth/ cover up... Also, the VIP who was in PdL - he / she is obviously 13 years older now and maybe holding a different role - is it still so necessary to keep that secret hidden?
    I was also interested in someone's earlier comment about the possibility of the swinging holiday having been done the previous year 2006 too. This to me is highly likely. More than likely that it was an annual event rather than a one off..
    Anyway, looking forward to learning your vie on things when the time is right.
    Thanks again for still being here

    ReplyDelete
  21. Just tossing this out there. Did Senior Edward Smethurst really have a holiday home in Luz since the year 1999? How about Macintosh Man, Brunt of the long-running contract secured scam? What about his alleged holiday home on the doorstep? What was it about the assemblance of so many connected Brits in that British-dominated enclave of an unremarkable 3* concrete jungle of a holiday complex? It makes no sense re the clientele occupying that unappealing dump, that one off-season week commencing in April. Hello! April?

    Anyone who knows anything about that part of the world knows that joint is a ghost town in April. Plus those pools weren't heated, hence the BS story regarding Madeleine throwing herself in the water, in a way she never did, because it was impossible. It is simply another slice of the ludicrously fictitious script. They should have listened to the real experts, not the boys in blue (hello Foy, RADA's calling!!) the blind leading the blind, the slaves whipping the slaves, the kind of individuals who have never read, I mean actually READ, a valid or worthwhile law book in their lives.

    AMATEURS...!

    ReplyDelete
  22. https://twitter.com/JoanaAMorais/status/1274199982883721217
    Joana Morais@JoanaAMorais
    ...where she should have been protected. (Lower third " When Brueckner found the teen she was allegedly pregnant.")
    //
    Personal note: this reads like a bad soap opera, a B movie, not even Hollywood would accept or write something so twisted, mediocre, and frankly, bellow par.//
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ea7eIHqX0AUEZmr?format=jpg&name=small
    5:38 AM · Jun 20, 2020

    *****

    A very good description of last night’s Sexta às 9 from Sandra Felgueiras.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Comment received and censored:

    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Correio da Manhã, June 17 2020 - Paper edition":

    Mad eyes Swann, and Synott, the possibly (if I can be ars!d), soon to be dug into like a seam of pure gold horror story, are about as useful to the media scam as a straw bungalow. Daft bat Swann has not got the nous to know when to stfu about 2014. I'm having her as well, the list is exponentially growing, because they are too empty to know when it's time to stop being Madeleine haters and to shut their offensive whiny gobs ziplock tight, and keep it that way.

    (Censored)

    (Censored).

    RGE

    Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 20 Jun 2020, 14:23:00

    *****

    Reason for censoring: protect the best we can the McCann twins. RGE was not offensive to them at all – in fact, to the contrary – but we prefer to keep them away from all this as much as we can.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sometimes heart and compassion overrides fear, but I absolutely take your point, we were told about six years ago that the whole truth had been told to them, but that was also an untruth.

      RGE

      Delete
  24. This is an important question. What journalistic character has been a continuous common denominator in the Madeleine was never missing in the first place media scam?

    That would be Martin [I'm a brilliant actor, I am] Brunt.

    Britain's NOT GOT Talent - CLEARLY.

    ReplyDelete
  25. There's an interesting article about the troll professor, Psychologist Dr John Synnott and his sidekick in the Morning Star online newspaper, the article is dated Tuesday, April 23, 2019.

    Looks like the seams have already been found and the digging's going to be easy.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The nastier Twitter element have decided to attack your blog by posting links in an attempt at ridicule and to shut you down. Extracting blood is not good enough for them, even though they are tragically out of their depth. The law is not on their side and never will be.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Textusa