This post, as our usual readers are familiar with, has the purpose to allow comments to continue as the original post has almost reached the limit of 200 one that Blogger allows for each comment page.
McFadden is still playing her games, trying to convince others that @InezShooter is a pro account. Always someone on hand to do her bidding and fire the bullet, isn't there Matthew? Of course they know it's the real Inez, but McF can't let it be seen that Inez who is very influential on #mccann has sussed her, so has to convince others that it isn't her.
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1067925852086652928 Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet Replying to @Anvil161Anvil16 @Andreamariapre2 But seriously, so text USA is a secret? I’m just curious? Because when it attempts to write Portuguese, most of the time its Spanish with a Portuguese flair 😂😂😎 #mmcann 3:38 pm - 28 Nov 2018
And then has tweeted this:
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1072949922746445824 Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet Replying to @anciana_abuela @JillWillybach @Joysetruth Claro que nao. A ideia e mesmo ridicula. Se as pessoas estudasem a investigacao de Goncalo Amaral em vez de teorias absurdas era mais ajuda 12:22 pm - 12 Dec 2018
Our Portuguese readers will understand.
If she comes to same conclusions about the Maddie case the same way she comes about other people’s linguistic skills, then not one thing she has concluded about the case should be taken seriously.
She's a fake. A phoney. She's 50 years old and hasn't lived in Portugal since she was a young teen, yet manages to convince the gullible that she has her finger on the pulse regarding all things Portuguese. Quite a feat to pull off so well done to her for that!
We are not publishing your comment because it's merely a personal attack on Isabelle McFadden.
We hesitated in publishing Anonymous 13 Dec 2018, 01:08:00's comment as it could also appear to be a personal attack.
However, reading it carefully, we believe the 50 yr old reference in the comment is to point out the time lapse that she has been out of Portugal to be able to have the "finger on the pulse" she claims to have.
That is relevant to the case, other personal details aren't. And it's relevant to the case in order to people make up their own minds on whether Isabelle McFadden is being truthful about what she says or if she's simply creating clutter around the case and if so, why.
In answer to Anon12 Dec 2018, 20:03:00 on the other post: Unfortunately it cannot be read in public. I recall that Elaine Strachan who was previously mentioned, was the first to recognise that Isabelle McFadden wasn't the person she portrayed herself to be, which was very difficult for most people to accept at the time. It's certainly a different story now though, so all credit to Elaine for being so astute.
Yeah and look at the flak Elaine took for that. Usual smear campaign from Thompson and McFadden that she was a pro. Always the way when someone criticises the Gang, or someone can't be controlled. Thompson is very lucky Elaine has accepted his olive branch after all the lies he spread about her. Elaine didn't buckle when subjected to his bullying. She just carried on doing her own thing. Very admirable. I don't think he's used to that.
So who is McFadden that she can allegedy get so close to the investigation as a housewife living in the USA?
Brian Kennedy + McFadden Sergey Malinka + McFadden Martin and Mary Smith + McFadden Mark Draycott of Operation Grange + McFadden PJ + McFadden Pedro de Corma + McFadden Sonia Poulton + McFadden Colin Sutton + McFadden Gemma O'Doherty + McFadden
Have I missed anyone out?
She's in contact with all these people and likes to let everyone know what she's 'close to the investigation' with personal sources who seem to trust her even though she shoots her mouth off on social media, but can't possibly say...even though she does love to say.
Thompson's method has always been to have altercations with people in public then apologise profusely in private, usually citing his health issues to win their sympathy. He then becomes the friend they thought he could never be and gradually attempts to gently extract their personal information to report back to HQ as he proffers bogus information about himself. I'm sure many people reading this will find it all very familiar.
:) The point at which she claimed Pedro do Carmo rang her up out of the blue to discuss the case and she "nearly fell off her seat with shock" was the point at which even the most forgiving and indulgent of her followers should have said "Enough!", if only for the sake of the hashtag. Let things like this pass without comment and it all becomes a farce. In case anyone is still in any doubt:
If, as is believed by many, she is inventing events, that’s one thing, but to directly quote what was allegedly said to her is another. Why is it that journalists, particularly Portuguese journalists who comment on the case, don’t have the same access to these sources? McF is not even an accredited journalist.
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Scare tactics - comments continue":
Anon @9:45 Yes, she really did! At first she just said it was someone very, very high up, a name she was so familiar with etc. then when no-one queried that she padded the story out at a later date and said it was Do Carmo who called her. (censored).
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 13 Dec 2018, 09:58:00
*****
Censored due to unnecessary offensive adjectivisation. Let's not lower ourselves to their level, please.
This is a follow-up to Textusa 12 Dec 2018, 12:47:00 and my ensuing comment (Anonymous 12 Dec 2018, 16:06:00).
After re-reading your comment, Textusa, I feel the need to clarify mine. There is an image on the 2017 German website with exact same dimensions (1280 x 853) and field of view as the Frog's picture:
I believe it impossible to a human eye to spot any difference between this picture and the Frog's one, but a further analysis revealed that they are not strictly identical: about 4% of the pixels have different color values.
The most plausible explanation I can find to this is that these images were compressed to JPEG format from the same original image at different times (using different software or different software versions/options). One ended up in the German website in 2017 and was reproduced on other sites later on. The other one ended up in last week's Frog's tweet.
In short, the Frog most likely didn't get her image from the internet, a conclusion it seems you have already reached from different considerations. Hope this is still useful in that it cross-validates your conclusion.
I have to amend what I wrote yesterday (sorry if this is becoming confusing).
It turns out that the discrepancies between the 2017 n-tv image and the Frog's image are due to Twitter. As I figured out by doing some more research on the topic, when you upload an image to Twitter, even if it is already in jpeg format, Twitter applies some further compression to it so that the color values are modified.
I ran the small experiment of tweeting a copy of the n-tv picture found here:
This proves beyond any doubt that the Frog tweeted a strict copy of the 1280x853 n-tv picture. She could therefore have found it on the internet, contrary to what I said yesterday, but the question remains how she came across that picture and, perhaps more importantly, why the picture surfaced 10 years after the tragedy.
Sorry again for the possible confusion. This issue appears less important than I initially thought, but I didn't want to leave misleading comments.
First of all and to be clear we stand corrected when we said photos were different.
Just to clarify, because it is important, when you say "This proves beyond any doubt that the Frog tweeted a strict copy of the 1280x853 n-tv picture" do you mean the Frog's picture HAD to be from the n-tv site or is it possible that both n-tv and the Frog used a copy of the same photo independently in time?
By the way NotFrog, to the Frog NOW it’s not important from which building the photo was taken:
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1072993065688797184 Green Leaper @FragrantFrog Replying to @CarlaSpade Oh, I clearly do. :) Tell me - which building am I supposed to be keeping secret? As far as I'm concerned, the location of the photographer is not important, it's the picture which is. 3:14 pm - 12 Dec 2018
*****
And we do agree with the Frog, the picture is becoming increasingly important, now that we put it together with the other 2 mentioned in comments in the previous post: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3429820/portugal-madeleine-mccann-ocean-club-praia-da-luz/ http://portugalresident.com/exclusive-%E2%80%9Cmark-warner-pulls-out-of-praia-da-luz%E2%80%9D-the-real-story
The Frog's picture does not have to come from n-tv but both the n-tv and Frog's pictures come from identical JPEG files.
The n-tv picture is linked (not copied) on two other websites: the MoJ forum and http://ocean.badgenot.site/ocean-club-praia-da-luz-algarve/
IF the Frog found the pic on the internet, it was either on n-tv or on one of these two sites and it was the n-tv pic (unless google images missed other sources). But nothing rules out that she got a copy from someone or was simply made aware of one of these sites by someone.
Probably more relevant is the fact that she could simply have said where she found the image but chose not to do so.
Thompson has protected his tweets again. He usually does this when his lies are exposed. He tends to return later when he thinks things have calmed down, leaving his cronies take the flak for him in the interim.
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1073170910176296960 00Bugsy @TheBunnyReturns @AbuseOfPower I'll unlock my account for this, Jill. So now we know who the anonymous shit stirrer is over at textusa's. Were your disgusting lies about me being a sex offender not enough, Jill? You're being played by the very ppl you detest, textusa - Bennett and Havern! #McCann https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuSrQHcWoAEZJuq.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuSrQRjW4AEgsXL.jpg 3:00 am - 13 Dec 2018
[Picture #1: “Anonymous 13 Dec 2018, 09:11:00 Thompson has protected his tweets again. He usually does this when his lies are exposed. He tends to return later when he thinks things have calmed down, leaving his cronies take the flak for him in the interim.
Reply Anonymous 13 Dec 2018, 09:47:00 The bunny always returns...”]
[Picture #2: “JillHavern @abuseofpower Replying to @strackers74@SadeElisha86 and 4 others He’s closed his account before to clean up his DM’s, but the bunny always returns. 19:51 11 Sep 17 Twitter Web Client”]
*****
Yes, it could be Jill Havern, it could be Tony Bennett (to name those you mentioned) but it could be any of our neighbours because, frankly, word playing @TheBunnyReturns to “the bunny will return” doesn’t take that much genius.
Note, unlike you do, we are not discarding the possibility of being those you accuse. Could well be.
However, we find it interesting (or to use the expression you so much love we use: VERY INTERESTING) that when it comes to you ““the bunny will return” is absolute proof that it is Jill Havern whilst all the similarities, namely but not only the previously frequent and now abandoned “it’s none of your business” between NT and Walkercan did not prove a thing. We keep using double standards of proof. What you say, is proof because you said it.
We know well you know what it is to play people around but as Abraham Lincoln said “you can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time” and a time you can’t fool anyone anymore does tend to come around.
These words apply to you, to those who tried to fool us and found out that things didn’t work out as well as they planned and serve as a warning to those who think they are fooling and to those thinking of fooling us in the future.
Note, we are not arrogant to the point of saying that no one is able to fool us. There were, are and will be those capable of that. What they weren’t, aren’t and won’t be is able to control our reactions once we find out we’ve been fooled.
Now, take a hike. Don’t think you’re talking to one of your groupies who you’ve convinced, each one of them, that they are special, the special ones who will be the ones who are going to be able to discover that illusive combination to your mysterious safe, which holds no mystery because it's an empty one.
Thompson is blinded by anger and deep-seated grudges which have impaired his judgement for a very long time, hence the fundamental mistakes he is always seen to make.
If you've fallen out with the gang you may be surprised to learn that you have been awarded your own folder on their cloud database which contains screen shots of all your tweets, Facebook posts, other social media activities, and all the private conversations you have had with them in the past.
You would think McEff would be concerned about the impact on her husbands business. It's easy to set up a Gang just like hers to trash it with bad reviews all over social media.
The very clear pro, head of all the pros on the internet is NT. He tried to transform himself into an anti with the help of his friends, a quite big list in which Mr Thompson is included, along with some imaginary pros but failed totally.
As we don't know either personally - we do know people who have met Mr Thompson - we cannot evidently say that they are 2 different people.
However, we are certain as we can be, that they are 2 different people. Completely different people.
It's possible NT and Thompson are two different people, but judging by the attempted structural disguise of NT's writing style, I believe it to be unlikely. It's also possible that NT is being fed articles for use on the blog by the prolific Mr Thompson and is making subtle editorial alterations to the style to maintain the facade, but Thompson is an expert at that anyway and would have no need to involve another individual, which brings me to the conclusion that NT is simply yet another Thompson persona.
Agreed. Thompson has now unlocked his Twitter account to launch an attack on Jill Havern who he wrongly believes to be responsible for observations and comments left on this blog.
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1073163372420628480 00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x Why does it matter who people are.. ? I thought #McCann was about researching the case & not researching the people researching the case.. Did I miss the memo on the way in...? An anonymous asks... 👇 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuSkZPaWkAYdQLH.jpg 2:31 am - 13 Dec 2018
[Picture attached: “Whispering @Anvil161Anvil16 Replying to @CarlaSpade But who is JBL – now THAT is the question. #mccann 8:01 13 Dec 18 Twitter Lite”]
https://twitter.com/InezShooter/status/1073163780102721536 Inez Shooter @InezShooter Replying to @jules1602x Yes what does it matter? I hope everyone sees your tweet, and I mean everyone. #mccann 2:32 am - 13 Dec 2018
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1073164328617025536 00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x Replying to @InezShooter It shouldn't matter.. Me too Carole.. :) 2:34 am - 13 Dec 2018
*****
When Jules says one thing shouldn’t matter, it’s because it should. A LOT. And Jules knows why it matters a LOT.
That said, we are absolutely against the outing of people. However, nothing can stop people from adding up 2 and 2.
Our readers remember that during the “Nick Towsend/Dogs evidence in court Hoax” we were far more interested in what JBL had to say than in what NT said.
#2 – The Sun aerial picture: https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/nintchdbpict000319512361.jpg
#3 – The PR aerial picture: http://portugalresident.com/sites/default/files/styles/node-detail/public/field/image/050507_sx_overhead_ocean_club_9.jpg
They contain loads of very important information. Let’s start at what time they were taken.
Picture #1 has already been established that it was in the morning.
We think we can all agree that that pictures #2 and #3 were taken by the same aerial means, probably a drone, doing a run over Praia da Luz, so basically at the same time.
What time was this and why is this important?
Over to the readers who would like to participate.
Going on the photos: #2 seems to be late in the evening, looking at the long shadows, certainly after the 'disappearance' happened. Following evening. You can see TV vans on the streets, etc. The VAN/TRUCK (delivering or taking away the BRT tops) is now parked up the street from Tapas. So if you match this with Frog's photo, the table tops haven't been removed - because the van is still on the street, just a few feet up. The table tops are still inside?
#3 shows TABLES with TABLE CLOTHES by the pool. Again, the same truck/van is parked on the street. Again, evening time.
In the Esplanade picture of covered tables etc there are 3 people wearing yellow tops whom I assume to be OC staff. In the hi-res version of the Portugal Resident photo there are 2 people wearing similar yellow tops on the top of the street opposite the McCann's apartment. Are they staff? Possible shift change indicating time of day maybe?
Doing a very rudimentary calculation, the shadows make an approximate 12 degree angle with the East/West line, and as May 4 lasted 14 hours, that means that the sun at about 1 hour before sunset. https://www.sunrise-and-sunset.com/pt/sun/portugal/calendario/2007/maio
Taking into account that on May 4 2007 the sunrise was at 20H33 we estimate that the photos were taken at around 19H30.
This hour is important that it is agreed upon. Not with total precision but with enough of it to say that it wasn’t at 17H00 or even at 18H00.
Anonymous13 Dec 2018, 16:54:00
If this was a TV series, you would have jumped to episode 5! We’re still in episode 1.
The movement of the truck probably has a very simple explanation. We would say the most logical would be to not present an obstacle to the entrance. Things linked to catering, for example, would be unloaded at the entrance, so it would be asked to move the truck a few metres down the road.
Another simple explanation, is that the driver went somewhere to lunch and then when s/he came back, parked a little further down the road.
What is relevant to retain is that the truck was there the whole day. It has been filmed and photographed in the morning and is still there at 19H30.
Anonymous 13 Dec 2018, 19:02:00,
Well picked up! Didn’t pick that up and although it could be just a coincidence, how likely would it be for 2 people to be wearing bright yellow tops? We would say very unlikely, so we would agree that they are indeed Tapas staff, at 19H30 outside the McCann apartment.
A hint as to one of the reasons (not the only one) why the time the photos were taken is important, is that this happened less than 2 hours later: https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article10244986.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/PROD-Gerald-McCann-L-and-Kate-McCann-R.jpg
The McCann’s first press conference. Do count how many TV trucks were there at 19H30. Take into account that at least 2 TV Stations had collected images in the morning. The Portuguese SIC and the British Channel 4.
The Channel 4 video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSZILWgblpU
At 02:07, one of the mysteries solved, by the shadows it can be seen that the dogs were there in the morning.
On the PR picture, someone with a red top is seen walking up Rua Francisco Gentil Martins seemingly carrying two shopping bags, so probably coming from Baptista supermarket, so photo taken before Baptista closing time. Don't know what it was on May 4 2007 though.
On the Sun picture, there are two people on the pavement opposite to OC Block 5 who seem to be walking down Rua FG Martins: one with black top, and one who seems to be a kid wearing pink trousers. They can be seen further down the street in the PR picture, about 50 meters away, so PR picture possibly taken 1-2 minutes after Sun picture.
This is corroborated by the red car seen in the Sun picture near the Police roadblock at the intersection of Rua Dr Agostinho da Silva and Rua FG Martins that appears to be stopped while front passenger(s) speak with someone with a white top. Could be the same car as the one seen in the cul-de-sac behind Tapas in the PR picture, where four other cars are already parked.
Quite clearly, journalists are preparing for an "event" and keep on arriving.
Agree with analysis, except on one point of important disagreement.
In agreement, thank you for spotting man and child and that tells us that the Sun (S) picture was taken before the PR one. The detail of man-child will be important further on as you’ll see.
About the photo taking, we believe that a helicopter was used as in 2007 drones were not widely spread and were not used by the media.
About the time, the fact that Baptista was open is consistent with photo taken at 19H30. Supermarkets with the size of Baptista are open for business at least up until dinner time in Portugal, which is 20H00 but we would say it wouldn’t close doors before 21H00 or even 22H00.
Where we disagree strongly is when you say “Quite clearly, journalists are preparing for an "event" and keep on arriving.”
Before we argue our case, it’s important that it’s established between us what we agree on what we see:
How many TV cars are there? We can clearly see 3. We are uncertain about the white vehicle that is on the bottom left of the S picture parked in the Rua Agostinho da Silva. It has 2 doors open but has no satellite dish, so we don’t consider it to be a TV vehicle. But would like your opinion about that.
Do you agree that photos taken from a helicopter?
Could you please expand as to the reasons that make you say that it’s clear that journos are preparing for an event?
Apologise, not meant to put you in any spot, we’re only, because it’s important, to try to understand if we are missing something which may make us change our mind.
Obviously, all readers are invited to give their opinions on this as well.
Not sure I agree with my own wording :) I was just referring to the many cars parked in the street at this late time of day, many of which I assumed to be from media reporters including press agency, radio, freelance... Also, the red car mentioned in my previous comment, which seems to come from Rua Dr FG Matins to go parking behind the Tapas (if my interpretation is correct) suggests that people keep on arriving. So what are all those people here for? Of course, there is the 8 o'clock journal and what not but I thought they were waiting specifically for the McCanns to appear.
I do agree that an helicopter is more likely than a drone in 2007, it was actually my first thought when I saw those pictures. Could it simply be the Protecção Civil helicopter used to help searches (mentioned by GA in Chapter 3)?
Not sure at all about the white car with open doors. Looks like it has some device on top of it, a roof antenna maybe? Also wondering about the two red cars parked in Rua 1º de Maio. Radio channel cars? Ambulances?
Can't wait to see why you strongly disagree on my interpretation. The truth is, I can't make much of these photos, so will be most happy to see some important facts come out.
DO NOT PUBLISH DO NOT PUBLISH identified reader at 14 Dec 2018, 17:00:00.
Yes, it's your comment and yes all your observations and questions are pertinent but the conclusion that you have come to is incorrect. As you understand we cannot say more at this stage.
Does anyone know what the square tent-like/marquee type construction is, please? It seems to be an add-on to the Tapas bar..it may be irrelevant but I haven't noticed it before. Thank you.
José Rodrigues dos Santos is very successful Portuguese TV anchor and author. Many years ago, when he started to write, I remember watching an interview about his most recent work then which focused on that tangible/intangible thing that is information. https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Rodrigues_dos_Santos
He said that his book was born because having one afternoon filmed a demonstration of a military tank, later when he saw the piece he put together he was fascinated by the fact that what he saw on the screen did not match with what he had seen with his own eyes on the ground.
There had been no intended manipulation but the fact that his cameraman made the effort to get the best angles, resulted in the news piece being more spectacular than in reality all had been.
One thing he gave as an example, was that in the news piece there seemed to be more people present than there really were. This was owed to the simple fact that the cameraman had just framed all those present and by doing that, hadn’t shown the majority of empty seats that were in the stands. Who hadn’t been in the demonstration but saw it only on TV, wouldn’t be able to know that only a few people did attend the event.
This distortion of reality fascinated him and he decided to write about it. Again, note, no intended manipulation, simply the cameraman doing his job to get the best images possible. Just doing his job properly.
From the interview (I haven’t read the book, nor can say what book it was as he has since dedicated himself to historical romances) the book took things in a different path than the one the photos of Praia da Luz show.
Rodrigues dos Santos it seems, in his book went on to investigate how the presence of cameras do alter the reality continuum because people do start to act differently when they become aware that they are being filmed. He tried to show how reality is different according to the presence of cameras.
In this tank demonstration there was no manipulation but there was distortion. Now imagine the distortion that can be achieved if manipulation is really intended. And that’s one of the many things that these Praia da Luz photos show: a news manipulation of the news itself.
Where is the media circus that we were all induced into believing that there had been the day after Maddie disappeared?
Nowhere to be seen because there wasn’t one. That simple and the pictures show it very clearly.
Portugal is in the same time-zone as the UK. Everyone knows that primetime news hour is 20H00. The photo was taken half an hour before TV Stations would be opening live. And there are only 3 TV vans.
And of these 3, 2 were in Luz since morning, SIC and CH4.
Their videos prove it. And one, SIC, very early in the morning as they captured the Tapas lot going to Portimão.
That leaves 1 TV van for: RTP, TVI, Sky News, BBC and ITV. Just to name the Portuguese and the British ones.
The Portuguese TVI, put up a very piece about it at 09:35 that morning on its TVI24 site but as far as we know, they didn’t say anything on TV at 13H00 nor at 20H00. https://tvi24.iol.pt/algarve/madeleine/crianca-inglesa-desaparecida
Nor did RTP. In fact, we all have in our memory that Gerry with his torch and notebook with Kate beside him were the first images of the case. That was filmed when it was dark, so well after 20H00. A couple of hours, at most after the pictures were taken.
And we only saw them on May 5 because they were not aired live.
Wasn’t the media supposed to be blaring about it since early morning of May 4? If we are to believe the statements of Yvonne Martin, Stephen Carpenter and the Murats that was what was supposedly happening… but where was all that media in Luz? Nowhere to be seen.
Do note that in Frog’s picture, the one taken in the morning, the TV van #3 (the one by the Block 2 pool in Rua Agostinho da Silva) is not present. It hadn’t arrived yet. But Yvonne Martin had come rushing from the other said of Lagos and Stephen Carpenter had done laps around Luz because of the news they heard, when at best, there were only 2 TV crews there.
On the T-crossing by Block 5, by the white car, one can see about a dozen people standing there. Were they the reporters, or just curious people? It they were reporters, were all of them reporters? And if all of them were reporters, can it be considered a media-storm? It can’t and it clearly wasn’t. 30 minutes before prime-time.
And yet, when one watches the videos of that first press conference, just filmed a couple of hours at most after these pictures were taken, one feels that the parking lot of Block 5 was filled with press: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeB_vGZWE5s
Just keep cameras flashing and the feeling that there were reporters piling up on each other is created. Is what we see at 19H30 consistent with the video conference? It isn’t.
But the pictures give us another media related detail: the helicopter.
Although there was clearly no major media footprint on the ground, there was a helicopter flying around taking pictures clearly related to Maddie’s disappearance.
There is clearly a disconnect between what one can see on the ground with what was deployed in the air.
It was like someone was determined to make the case a media-storm when it was far from being one. And for that to be can be because someone knew at 19H30 of May 4 2007 that Maddie would never be found.
DO NOT PUBLISH DO NOT PUBLISH at 15 Dec 2018, 09:35:00 Please allow us to publish the contents of your comments with or without your “internet ID” as you wish.
This last one is media related and we think it’s pertinent to the analysis. Thank you.
For example, where are the search parties, where is the looking at bins, yards, fields, wells, etc? Shouldn't Luz be really filled with people on the streets and everywhere?
Another example, with so many guests there, why not a SINGLE one at the Tapas area?
We think we should now publish the comments that we have withheld:
“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Scare tactics - comments continue":
What strikes me is the complete absence of any holiday makers in the OC complex. Correct me if I am wrong but I literally can't see anyone. Possibly too cold to swim or sunbathe but no tennis, no kids in the playground, no-one going anywhere, no-one just going for a stroll in the early evening.
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 14 Dec 2018, 14:18:00”
And:
“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Scare tactics - comments continue":
Hi - do you think it's odd that the photos don't show any holiday-makers around the pool area? I know T9 wouldn't be expected to be there but those guest not associated in any way might. Just a thought. Thank you.
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 14 Dec 2018, 18:55:00”
And we’re waiting for the “do not publish” reader to allow us to transcribe here the content of his comments that is pertinent to this debate.
What happened to "Bot?" I'll DM you Isabelle...... #mccann Looks like orchestrated attempt to get rid of Carole's new account by mass-reporting it to be a bot. They are so malicious they can't resist gloating about it. It is indeed "sad"
The fact that @1matthewwright1 asks @InezShooter directly what she said in a recent DM from her previous account, proves that he doesn't know whether it is or not, despite other account's 'certainty'.
Isabelle's campaign to convince that Inez is fake comes off the rails as Matthew finally accepts it is her, after she quotes things said in DM to him. What took him so long!? They are all brainwashed by McF, who couldn't detect her way out of a paper bag, but IS cunning enough to manipulate others.
That is the best skill she possesses. I wish more people who joke about her transparency as an absolute fantasist would just say it openly instead of continually liking her tweets for the sheer fact that they don't want attacked by her lapdog Silverbore et al. Slowly but surely she will be exposed.
Yes. She is happy to be told what to do, as long as she can bask in her mistress's reflected glory. How cringeworthy watching her slavish sycophancy, obsequiously offering thanks for being given a new name and avatar by the boss. Honoured? Really? Have some self respect!
Despite her claims to be on Twitter as a voice for Madeleine, Silverdoe has locked her tweets from public view which proves she prioritises her own bruised ego first and foremost as mentioned in the previous comments section.
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1072278974791860224 Green Leaper @FragrantFrog Replying to @CarlaSpade @may_shazzy and 4 others Just as the phone records were transposed onto spreadsheets, OC staff must have given PJ new sheets listing only the MW diners at Tapas. Clearly all the Thomas Cook guests were not banned from using the facilities. #mccann 3:56 pm - 10 Dec 2018
*****
So, Tapas had booking sheets for all clients. Maddie disappeared and they went back and redid them all, just with MW customers.
Why guests from other operators considered people of not interest (only reason for them to have been “deleted” from the records)? And why were only MW guests to be considered people of interest?
And then, having redone all the reservation sheets to include only MW guests, the Tapas decided to write up the beverage consumption the way they did.
Unicorns, according to some (by coincidence always the same ones) do exist.
Disclaimer: We know that it’s unnecessary to say this but we would like it to make it clear that this individual does NOT represent the blog in any way. We have no control as to who uses our name, we can only dissociate ourselves from those who do and then publicly express opposite views to the ones the blog holds:
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1073358504168120321 Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐Retweeted Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 I would like to thank SilverText USA for all her help. Many of my videos are downloaded and formatted by her, I then add graphics, text and the commentary... TeamWork #mccann Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐added, Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet Follow >>>@xxSiLverdoexx Michelle is a fantastic researcher on the #MadeleineMccann Great Stuff!!! #mccann 3:26 pm - 13 Dec 2018
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1073360294242467840 Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet Replying to @Joyousb90 Love her new name Silver Text USA Inspired by a blog mostly about her fantastic work on #mccann https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuVXf06VYAE1ZnB.jpg 3:33 pm - 13 Dec 2018
https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1073359108152139776 SiLverTextUSAxx @xxSiLverdoexx Replying to @McCannCaseTweet And thank you for my amazing new name and graphics Isabelle you're a star😍😍😍 I'm honoured you do amazing work for Madeleine towards the truth here for us all on #mccann, thank you! 😘😘 3:28 pm - 13 Dec 2018
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1073359503796641793 Green Leaper @FragrantFrog Replying to @CarlaSpade Do you know that you can go walkabout in Luz without actually being there & some buildings even have their name on a sign attached to a wall, visible from the road? #mccann 3:30 pm - 13 Dec 2018
*****
How interesting it is to watch the Frog trying to dissociate herself from Cristaluz and from whomever took that picture.
Like everyone walks around and memorises names of buildings. If so, why not call it Cristaluz Lote 3 because that is the name that is there to be memorised: https://www.google.com/maps/@37.0896158,-8.7308575,3a,75y,93.52h,86.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1suitVjBbkwI_OGwnUtYFX1g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Note that this name is a street that no one walks in. Coming from the Millenium, along the Rua do Ramalhete, one turns right down the Rua Dr Agostinho da Silva (the street where Murat’s property is) to go to the centre of the Luz. The path that Derek Flack says he walked for example, or the the one TS says she walked in both directions on the different sightings.
No one, unless they’re driving, continues to walk in the Rua do Ramalhete unless one lives or is going to one of the properties in the area.
We think the Frog has forgotten she was specific about the floor and balcony. Now is suggesting it was drone footage.
It would have been more intelligent not to have been specific. But now it’s too late.
No one has done to McEff what she is doing to others. Although it would be easy to drop a word in the ears of the local competition to hubby's business about the wifey's filthy behaviour, no one has. Says a lot about who has integrity.
Yes and the fact that no one has done it even though they can is a good indication that those people who are being stalked are not the criminal types. Far from it. X
I love how you're living rent free in Michelle and Isabelle's heads, Textusa! haha, they're even boosting your blog's SEO and internet profile free of charge, how kind of them.
We ask readers not to personalise things. We have not published comments by Pseudo Nym accusing Jill Havern of publishing some of the comments in this post.
We thank you for defending us with such passion but we agree with Anonymous 14 Dec 2018, 17:26:00 (thank you, for such an opportune comment) as we believe that what Anonymous 14 Dec 2018, 16:17:00 is saying is the opposite of what your comment implies: they are giving more visibility to the blog.
Silverdoe is now the 5th person to give us free publicity: Bugsy, Jules and Sade have put up a "secret agent" whatever because of us, and then of course Not Textusa who whenever he says anything, be it about the case or about tadpole fishing, makes people curious about us.
Thanks to them, people come to read and can make up their own minds about what we say.
I think you have made a positive impact on at least one person today. Hope it lasts. X
"Never again will I mention you or your blog - You truly are VILE. I wouldn't tar my brush with your filth ever again if I was paid to, you disgust me textusa and I will enjoy seeing the day you get your karma, I advice all to be aware of the nastiness that blogs doing"
Interesting take on McF’s twitter account by someone in a group I belong to:
Clara Bella shared her first post.
New Member • 5 minutes ago
We all have theories and this is based on what has been put out there by MSM and alternative media, which in fact is very hard to differentiate any longer as they’re all out for the £££ people please be aware that some cases are fiction for a reason. This Madeline case has plenty of spins and turns for a reason. The problem here is that the media reported on the case before it was investigated that's an indication that seeds needed to be planted and the case needed to be ruined. If you view it as a "story" you'll see what I mean. Also there is a twitter account called Madelinemccantweets, this account is controlled to keep everyone reading and believing that the parents are to blame.. this is what they need everyone to think so it keeps this conspiracy going, I asked the person about my ideas and had lots of questions I was blocked, unless you agree with this twitter accounts story she allows you to be part of the conspiracy, if you dare to question it then you are ignored and blocked. This for me is a RED FLAG open debate is fine, we all have a right to question everything but it's best to research and find the facts (if there is even any with the McCann case) Another RED FLAG is the money side of it that keeps being reported, I don't think it's even exchanging hands, it's just to keep the "story" alive for alternative reasons. Some ideas, were the McCanns being followed and blackmailed once Maddy had disappeared. Was Maddie even on that holiday? Have the McCanns been asked to front a "story" due to Gerry's past links to unsavoury allegations. All is not as it's being portrayed in this cover up abduction/parents done it saga.
https://twitter.com/mrjnh07/status/1073689782990106624 MrJNH @mrjnh07 Replying to @The_Truth_II @JillWillybach and 2 others What's the #McCann 'paedophilia' theory P, exactly? Not sure I've ever seen a consistent argument propounded. 1:22 pm - 14 Dec 2018
*****
Very good point.
Can anyone provide a link to where we can read about the paedo theory? Outside the vague “there were dark powers” involved?
We don’t want names but want details as to the flux of events. Where it happened, why it happened in Luz, what was going on, why they were able to muster up all the support… basically what are the precise 'details' for the 'paedo' theory as we have done with the ‘swinging’ theory running the risk of having it scrutinised.
Also links to the sedation theory would be useful.
Basically a link that answers what is asked here for swinging (and has been more than answered by us) but for paedo:
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1073698641947385857 00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌🌸🐌🌸🐌🌸 @jules1602x Replying to @The_Truth_II @xxSiLverdoexx and The thing about swinging is, when people have asked simple things such as, where did it take place, how did they get there etc, they get shut down.. Did it happen in the daytime, at night, or both...Were the kids in the crèche , if not ,where were they.. #McCann 1:57 PM - 14 Dec 2018
https://twitter.com/mccannscamexpos/status/1073894489117343744 BELFAST BANSHEE @mccannscamexpos Replying to @CarlaSpade @strackers74 I think Payne is a pedo I'm entitled to my opinion as it is based on information contained within the pj files but I don't believe #MadeleineMcCann died as a result of sexual abuse now swing back over to your corner #McCann 2:56 am - 15 Dec 2018
After having said this:
https://twitter.com/mccannscamexpos/status/1071875186364952579 BELFAST BANSHEE @mccannscamexpos The Gaspar statement clearly shows something darker, dirtier, sleaze, the blue eyeshadow picture backs up the filth the Gaspar statement indicates .... sorry that's not swinging that's raping children #McCann as children can't consent it's RAPE 1:12 pm - 9 Dec 2018
Do sedation theorists disregard the paedo info that is in the files?
Speaking of Yvonne Martin and the Gaspars. If you disregard what they have said, could you please explain why?
We have said they came forward to point the finger specifically at David Payne and to instill the "paedo-myth" into the case but as we believe that the sedation theorists do not subscribe our opinions, we are curious to know why they disregard the inputs of these people.
In terms of Twitter, most people are reluctant to mention 'the sultan of swing' Robert Murat due to pressure from JillyCL (formerly Jilly Come Lately) and her pals Isabelle McFadden, Ben Thompson, etc. A hidden truth awaits their followers.
Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.
McFadden is still playing her games, trying to convince others that @InezShooter is a pro account. Always someone on hand to do her bidding and fire the bullet, isn't there Matthew? Of course they know it's the real Inez, but McF can't let it be seen that Inez who is very influential on #mccann has sussed her, so has to convince others that it isn't her.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 12 Dec 2018, 22:46:00,
DeleteShe has tweeted this:
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1067925852086652928
Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet
Replying to @Anvil161Anvil16 @Andreamariapre2
But seriously, so text USA is a secret? I’m just curious? Because when it attempts to write Portuguese, most of the time its Spanish with a Portuguese flair 😂😂😎 #mmcann
3:38 pm - 28 Nov 2018
And then has tweeted this:
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1072949922746445824
Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet
Replying to @anciana_abuela @JillWillybach @Joysetruth
Claro que nao. A ideia e mesmo ridicula. Se as pessoas estudasem a investigacao de Goncalo Amaral em vez de teorias absurdas era mais ajuda
12:22 pm - 12 Dec 2018
Our Portuguese readers will understand.
If she comes to same conclusions about the Maddie case the same way she comes about other people’s linguistic skills, then not one thing she has concluded about the case should be taken seriously.
She's a fake. A phoney. She's 50 years old and hasn't lived in Portugal since she was a young teen, yet manages to convince the gullible that she has her finger on the pulse regarding all things Portuguese. Quite a feat to pull off so well done to her for that!
DeleteUnpublished Anonymous at 13 Dec 2018, 09:34:00,
DeleteWe are not publishing your comment because it's merely a personal attack on Isabelle McFadden.
We hesitated in publishing Anonymous 13 Dec 2018, 01:08:00's comment as it could also appear to be a personal attack.
However, reading it carefully, we believe the 50 yr old reference in the comment is to point out the time lapse that she has been out of Portugal to be able to have the "finger on the pulse" she claims to have.
That is relevant to the case, other personal details aren't. And it's relevant to the case in order to people make up their own minds on whether Isabelle McFadden is being truthful about what she says or if she's simply creating clutter around the case and if so, why.
Thank you for understanding.
In answer to Anon12 Dec 2018, 20:03:00 on the other post: Unfortunately it cannot be read in public. I recall that Elaine Strachan who was previously mentioned, was the first to recognise that Isabelle McFadden wasn't the person she portrayed herself to be, which was very difficult for most people to accept at the time. It's certainly a different story now though, so all credit to Elaine for being so astute.
ReplyDeleteYeah and look at the flak Elaine took for that. Usual smear campaign from Thompson and McFadden that she was a pro. Always the way when someone criticises the Gang, or someone can't be controlled.
DeleteThompson is very lucky Elaine has accepted his olive branch after all the lies he spread about her. Elaine didn't buckle when subjected to his bullying. She just carried on doing her own thing. Very admirable. I don't think he's used to that.
So who is McFadden that she can allegedy get so close to the investigation as a housewife living in the USA?
DeleteBrian Kennedy + McFadden
Sergey Malinka + McFadden
Martin and Mary Smith + McFadden
Mark Draycott of Operation Grange + McFadden
PJ + McFadden
Pedro de Corma + McFadden
Sonia Poulton + McFadden
Colin Sutton + McFadden
Gemma O'Doherty + McFadden
Have I missed anyone out?
She's in contact with all these people and likes to let everyone know what she's 'close to the investigation' with personal sources who seem to trust her even though she shoots her mouth off on social media, but can't possibly say...even though she does love to say.
Thompson's method has always been to have altercations with people in public then apologise profusely in private, usually citing his health issues to win their sympathy. He then becomes the friend they thought he could never be and gradually attempts to gently extract their personal information to report back to HQ as he proffers bogus information about himself. I'm sure many people reading this will find it all very familiar.
Delete:) The point at which she claimed Pedro do Carmo rang her up out of the blue to discuss the case and she "nearly fell off her seat with shock" was the point at which even the most forgiving and indulgent of her followers should have said "Enough!", if only for the sake of the hashtag. Let things like this pass without comment and it all becomes a farce. In case anyone is still in any doubt:
DeleteThis. Did. Not. Happen.
She really said that? Seriously?
DeleteOther McF contacts:
DeleteInspector Simoes, Jose de Freitas and Arul Gaspar - from memory.
https://mobile.twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1072999565672964097
DeleteIf, as is believed by many, she is inventing events, that’s one thing, but to directly quote what was allegedly said to her is another.
Why is it that journalists, particularly Portuguese journalists who comment on the case, don’t have the same access to these sources?
McF is not even an accredited journalist.
Comment that we have censored:
DeleteAnonymous has left a new comment on your post "Scare tactics - comments continue":
Anon @9:45
Yes, she really did! At first she just said it was someone very, very high up, a name she was so familiar with etc. then when no-one queried that she padded the story out at a later date and said it was Do Carmo who called her. (censored).
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 13 Dec 2018, 09:58:00
*****
Censored due to unnecessary offensive adjectivisation. Let's not lower ourselves to their level, please.
Thank you for understanding.
No worries. You are always very fair, even to those who don't treat others fairly. Respect.
DeleteThis is a follow-up to Textusa 12 Dec 2018, 12:47:00 and my ensuing comment (Anonymous 12 Dec 2018, 16:06:00).
ReplyDeleteAfter re-reading your comment, Textusa, I feel the need to clarify mine. There is an image on the 2017 German website with exact same dimensions (1280 x 853) and field of view as the Frog's picture:
https://bilder3.n-tv.de/img/incoming/origs19814918/1322539623-w1280-h960/1ad15a9d3fcb2ef8141054761aa08949.jpg
I believe it impossible to a human eye to spot any difference between this picture and the Frog's one, but a further analysis revealed that they are not strictly identical: about 4% of the pixels have different color values.
The most plausible explanation I can find to this is that these images were compressed to JPEG format from the same original image at different times (using different software or different software versions/options). One ended up in the German website in 2017 and was reproduced on other sites later on. The other one ended up in last week's Frog's tweet.
In short, the Frog most likely didn't get her image from the internet, a conclusion it seems you have already reached from different considerations. Hope this is still useful in that it cross-validates your conclusion.
NotFrog
I have to amend what I wrote yesterday (sorry if this is becoming confusing).
DeleteIt turns out that the discrepancies between the 2017 n-tv image and the Frog's image are due to Twitter. As I figured out by doing some more research on the topic, when you upload an image to Twitter, even if it is already in jpeg format, Twitter applies some further compression to it so that the color values are modified.
I ran the small experiment of tweeting a copy of the n-tv picture found here:
https://bilder3.n-tv.de/img/incoming/origs19814918/1322539623-w1280-h960/1ad15a9d3fcb2ef8141054761aa08949.jpg
and verified that the image uploaded to the Twitter server is actually strictly identical to that tweeted by the Frog:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dtw7y25WwAAYBSc.jpg:large
This proves beyond any doubt that the Frog tweeted a strict copy of the 1280x853 n-tv picture. She could therefore have found it on the internet, contrary to what I said yesterday, but the question remains how she came across that picture and, perhaps more importantly, why the picture surfaced 10 years after the tragedy.
Sorry again for the possible confusion. This issue appears less important than I initially thought, but I didn't want to leave misleading comments.
NotFrog
NotFrog,
DeleteThank you for your hard work.
First of all and to be clear we stand corrected when we said photos were different.
Just to clarify, because it is important, when you say "This proves beyond any doubt that the Frog tweeted a strict copy of the 1280x853 n-tv picture" do you mean the Frog's picture HAD to be from the n-tv site or is it possible that both n-tv and the Frog used a copy of the same photo independently in time?
By the way NotFrog, to the Frog NOW it’s not important from which building the photo was taken:
Deletehttps://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1072993065688797184
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @CarlaSpade
Oh, I clearly do. :) Tell me - which building am I supposed to be keeping secret? As far as I'm concerned, the location of the photographer is not important, it's the picture which is.
3:14 pm - 12 Dec 2018
*****
And we do agree with the Frog, the picture is becoming increasingly important, now that we put it together with the other 2 mentioned in comments in the previous post:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3429820/portugal-madeleine-mccann-ocean-club-praia-da-luz/
http://portugalresident.com/exclusive-%E2%80%9Cmark-warner-pulls-out-of-praia-da-luz%E2%80%9D-the-real-story
The Frog's picture does not have to come from n-tv but both the n-tv and Frog's pictures come from identical JPEG files.
DeleteThe n-tv picture is linked (not copied) on two other websites: the MoJ forum and
http://ocean.badgenot.site/ocean-club-praia-da-luz-algarve/
IF the Frog found the pic on the internet, it was either on n-tv or on one of these two sites and it was the n-tv pic (unless google images missed other sources). But nothing rules out that she got a copy from someone or was simply made aware of one of these sites by someone.
Probably more relevant is the fact that she could simply have said where she found the image but chose not to do so.
NotFrog
Thompson has protected his tweets again. He usually does this when his lies are exposed. He tends to return later when he thinks things have calmed down, leaving his cronies take the flak for him in the interim.
ReplyDeleteThe bunny always returns...
Deletehttps://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1073170910176296960
Delete00Bugsy @TheBunnyReturns
@AbuseOfPower I'll unlock my account for this, Jill. So now we know who the anonymous shit stirrer is over at textusa's. Were your disgusting lies about me being a sex offender not enough, Jill? You're being played by the very ppl you detest, textusa - Bennett and Havern! #McCann
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuSrQHcWoAEZJuq.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuSrQRjW4AEgsXL.jpg
3:00 am - 13 Dec 2018
[Picture #1:
“Anonymous 13 Dec 2018, 09:11:00
Thompson has protected his tweets again. He usually does this when his lies are exposed. He tends to return later when he thinks things have calmed down, leaving his cronies take the flak for him in the interim.
Reply
Anonymous 13 Dec 2018, 09:47:00
The bunny always returns...”]
[Picture #2:
“JillHavern
@abuseofpower
Replying to @strackers74@SadeElisha86 and 4 others
He’s closed his account before to clean up his DM’s, but the bunny always returns.
19:51 11 Sep 17 Twitter Web Client”]
*****
Yes, it could be Jill Havern, it could be Tony Bennett (to name those you mentioned) but it could be any of our neighbours because, frankly, word playing @TheBunnyReturns to “the bunny will return” doesn’t take that much genius.
Note, unlike you do, we are not discarding the possibility of being those you accuse. Could well be.
However, we find it interesting (or to use the expression you so much love we use: VERY INTERESTING) that when it comes to you ““the bunny will return” is absolute proof that it is Jill Havern whilst all the similarities, namely but not only the previously frequent and now abandoned “it’s none of your business” between NT and Walkercan did not prove a thing. We keep using double standards of proof. What you say, is proof because you said it.
We know well you know what it is to play people around but as Abraham Lincoln said “you can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time” and a time you can’t fool anyone anymore does tend to come around.
These words apply to you, to those who tried to fool us and found out that things didn’t work out as well as they planned and serve as a warning to those who think they are fooling and to those thinking of fooling us in the future.
Note, we are not arrogant to the point of saying that no one is able to fool us. There were, are and will be those capable of that. What they weren’t, aren’t and won’t be is able to control our reactions once we find out we’ve been fooled.
Now, take a hike. Don’t think you’re talking to one of your groupies who you’ve convinced, each one of them, that they are special, the special ones who will be the ones who are going to be able to discover that illusive combination to your mysterious safe, which holds no mystery because it's an empty one.
Thompson is blinded by anger and deep-seated grudges which have impaired his judgement for a very long time, hence the fundamental mistakes he is always seen to make.
DeleteIf you've fallen out with the gang you may be surprised to learn that you have been awarded your own folder on their cloud database which contains screen shots of all your tweets, Facebook posts, other social media activities, and all the private conversations you have had with them in the past.
ReplyDeleteIs this the same gang who complains that their tweets are posted here?
DeleteYou would think McEff would be concerned about the impact on her husbands business. It's easy to set up a Gang just like hers to trash it with bad reviews all over social media.
DeleteObservant viewers may have already noticed that Thompson's other personas are currently in pause mode.
ReplyDeleteDid anyone notice that Bugsy said he was going on holiday just as NT said he was going to be busy for a week or so?
DeleteDid they go on holiday together or is Bugsy NT?
Their blogs are very similar...and they always end their 'debunking' paragraphs with a personal insult.
Didn't Textusa once say that the NT blog was run by a pro and then recently became 'anti'?
Anonymous 13 Dec 2018, 10:50:00,
DeleteThe very clear pro, head of all the pros on the internet is NT. He tried to transform himself into an anti with the help of his friends, a quite big list in which Mr Thompson is included, along with some imaginary pros but failed totally.
As we don't know either personally - we do know people who have met Mr Thompson - we cannot evidently say that they are 2 different people.
However, we are certain as we can be, that they are 2 different people. Completely different people.
It's possible NT and Thompson are two different people, but judging by the attempted structural disguise of NT's writing style, I believe it to be unlikely. It's also possible that NT is being fed articles for use on the blog by the prolific Mr Thompson and is making subtle editorial alterations to the style to maintain the facade, but Thompson is an expert at that anyway and would have no need to involve another individual, which brings me to the conclusion that NT is simply yet another Thompson persona.
DeleteAnonymous 13 Dec 2018, 11:22:00,
DeleteWe respect your opinion but NT ranks way higher in their food chain than Mr Thompson.
Let's agree to disagree on this.
Agreed. Thompson has now unlocked his Twitter account to launch an attack on Jill Havern who he wrongly believes to be responsible for observations and comments left on this blog.
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1073163372420628480
ReplyDelete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Why does it matter who people are.. ? I thought #McCann was about researching the case & not researching the people researching the case..
Did I miss the memo on the way in...?
An anonymous asks...
👇
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuSkZPaWkAYdQLH.jpg
2:31 am - 13 Dec 2018
[Picture attached:
“Whispering
@Anvil161Anvil16
Replying to @CarlaSpade
But who is JBL – now THAT is the question. #mccann
8:01 13 Dec 18 Twitter Lite”]
https://twitter.com/InezShooter/status/1073163780102721536
Inez Shooter @InezShooter
Replying to @jules1602x
Yes what does it matter? I hope everyone sees your tweet, and I mean everyone. #mccann
2:32 am - 13 Dec 2018
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1073164328617025536
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @InezShooter
It shouldn't matter.. Me too Carole.. :)
2:34 am - 13 Dec 2018
*****
When Jules says one thing shouldn’t matter, it’s because it should. A LOT. And Jules knows why it matters a LOT.
That said, we are absolutely against the outing of people. However, nothing can stop people from adding up 2 and 2.
Our readers remember that during the “Nick Towsend/Dogs evidence in court Hoax” we were far more interested in what JBL had to say than in what NT said.
How can you be “totally against outing people “ but claim that NT is Walker? If NT was Walker, then you would have outed him. Hypocrisy.
DeleteHello NT,
DeleteJust for you, the words of this great philosopher:
"Woop-de-fkn-do One anonymous entity has been linked to another, halt the manufacturing of circulcular tables, STAT"
Sade "Potty-Mouth" Anslow
(https://twitter.com/SadeElisha86/status/1068278068681326594)
PS - By the way, do you still have on the front page of that dead blog of yours that you don't comment here?
Shall we start to get the ball rolling on the importance of the 3 pictures?
ReplyDeleteThey are these:
#1 – Frog’s Cristaluz picture:
https://bilder3.n-tv.de/img/incoming/origs19814918/1322539623-w1280-h960/1ad15a9d3fcb2ef8141054761aa08949.jpg
#2 – The Sun aerial picture:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/nintchdbpict000319512361.jpg
#3 – The PR aerial picture:
http://portugalresident.com/sites/default/files/styles/node-detail/public/field/image/050507_sx_overhead_ocean_club_9.jpg
They contain loads of very important information. Let’s start at what time they were taken.
Picture #1 has already been established that it was in the morning.
We think we can all agree that that pictures #2 and #3 were taken by the same aerial means, probably a drone, doing a run over Praia da Luz, so basically at the same time.
What time was this and why is this important?
Over to the readers who would like to participate.
Later pics look to be much later on in the afternoon, maybe going into early evening looking at shade, shadows etc.
DeleteGoing on the photos: #2 seems to be late in the evening, looking at the long shadows, certainly after the 'disappearance' happened. Following evening. You can see TV vans on the streets, etc. The VAN/TRUCK (delivering or taking away the BRT tops) is now parked up the street from Tapas. So if you match this with Frog's photo, the table tops haven't been removed - because the van is still on the street, just a few feet up. The table tops are still inside?
Delete#3 shows TABLES with TABLE CLOTHES by the pool. Again, the same truck/van is parked on the street. Again, evening time.
In the Esplanade picture of covered tables etc there are 3 people wearing yellow tops whom I assume to be OC staff. In the hi-res version of the Portugal Resident photo there are 2 people wearing similar yellow tops on the top of the street opposite the McCann's apartment. Are they staff? Possible shift change indicating time of day maybe?
DeleteAnonymous 13 Dec 2018, 16:40:00,
DeleteDoing a very rudimentary calculation, the shadows make an approximate 12 degree angle with the East/West line, and as May 4 lasted 14 hours, that means that the sun at about 1 hour before sunset.
https://www.sunrise-and-sunset.com/pt/sun/portugal/calendario/2007/maio
Taking into account that on May 4 2007 the sunrise was at 20H33 we estimate that the photos were taken at around 19H30.
This hour is important that it is agreed upon. Not with total precision but with enough of it to say that it wasn’t at 17H00 or even at 18H00.
Anonymous13 Dec 2018, 16:54:00
If this was a TV series, you would have jumped to episode 5! We’re still in episode 1.
The movement of the truck probably has a very simple explanation. We would say the most logical would be to not present an obstacle to the entrance. Things linked to catering, for example, would be unloaded at the entrance, so it would be asked to move the truck a few metres down the road.
Another simple explanation, is that the driver went somewhere to lunch and then when s/he came back, parked a little further down the road.
What is relevant to retain is that the truck was there the whole day. It has been filmed and photographed in the morning and is still there at 19H30.
Anonymous 13 Dec 2018, 19:02:00,
Well picked up! Didn’t pick that up and although it could be just a coincidence, how likely would it be for 2 people to be wearing bright yellow tops? We would say very unlikely, so we would agree that they are indeed Tapas staff, at 19H30 outside the McCann apartment.
A hint as to one of the reasons (not the only one) why the time the photos were taken is important, is that this happened less than 2 hours later:
https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article10244986.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/PROD-Gerald-McCann-L-and-Kate-McCann-R.jpg
The McCann’s first press conference. Do count how many TV trucks were there at 19H30. Take into account that at least 2 TV Stations had collected images in the morning. The Portuguese SIC and the British Channel 4.
The Channel 4 video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSZILWgblpU
At 02:07, one of the mysteries solved, by the shadows it can be seen that the dogs were there in the morning.
On the PR picture, someone with a red top is seen walking up Rua Francisco Gentil Martins seemingly carrying two shopping bags, so probably coming from Baptista supermarket, so photo taken before Baptista closing time. Don't know what it was on May 4 2007 though.
DeleteOn the Sun picture, there are two people on the pavement opposite to OC Block 5 who seem to be walking down Rua FG Martins: one with black top, and one who seems to be a kid wearing pink trousers. They can be seen further down the street in the PR picture, about 50 meters away, so PR picture possibly taken 1-2 minutes after Sun picture.
This is corroborated by the red car seen in the Sun picture near the Police roadblock at the intersection of Rua Dr Agostinho da Silva and Rua FG Martins that appears to be stopped while front passenger(s) speak with someone with a white top. Could be the same car as the one seen in the cul-de-sac behind Tapas in the PR picture, where four other cars are already parked.
Quite clearly, journalists are preparing for an "event" and keep on arriving.
NotFrog
NotFrog,
DeleteAgree with analysis, except on one point of important disagreement.
In agreement, thank you for spotting man and child and that tells us that the Sun (S) picture was taken before the PR one. The detail of man-child will be important further on as you’ll see.
About the photo taking, we believe that a helicopter was used as in 2007 drones were not widely spread and were not used by the media.
About the time, the fact that Baptista was open is consistent with photo taken at 19H30. Supermarkets with the size of Baptista are open for business at least up until dinner time in Portugal, which is 20H00 but we would say it wouldn’t close doors before 21H00 or even 22H00.
Where we disagree strongly is when you say “Quite clearly, journalists are preparing for an "event" and keep on arriving.”
Before we argue our case, it’s important that it’s established between us what we agree on what we see:
How many TV cars are there?
We can clearly see 3.
We are uncertain about the white vehicle that is on the bottom left of the S picture parked in the Rua Agostinho da Silva. It has 2 doors open but has no satellite dish, so we don’t consider it to be a TV vehicle. But would like your opinion about that.
Do you agree that photos taken from a helicopter?
Could you please expand as to the reasons that make you say that it’s clear that journos are preparing for an event?
Apologise, not meant to put you in any spot, we’re only, because it’s important, to try to understand if we are missing something which may make us change our mind.
Obviously, all readers are invited to give their opinions on this as well.
Thank you.
Not sure I agree with my own wording :) I was just referring to the many cars parked in the street at this late time of day, many of which I assumed to be from media reporters including press agency, radio, freelance... Also, the red car mentioned in my previous comment, which seems to come from Rua Dr FG Matins to go parking behind the Tapas (if my interpretation is correct) suggests that people keep on arriving. So what are all those people here for? Of course, there is the 8 o'clock journal and what not but I thought they were waiting specifically for the McCanns to appear.
DeleteI do agree that an helicopter is more likely than a drone in 2007, it was actually my first thought when I saw those pictures. Could it simply be the Protecção Civil helicopter used to help searches (mentioned by GA in Chapter 3)?
Not sure at all about the white car with open doors. Looks like it has some device on top of it, a roof antenna maybe? Also wondering about the two red cars parked in Rua 1º de Maio. Radio channel cars? Ambulances?
Can't wait to see why you strongly disagree on my interpretation. The truth is, I can't make much of these photos, so will be most happy to see some important facts come out.
NotFrog
NotFrog,
DeleteThank you. Will reply in detail later but for now it was important to establish that the white car was not a TV van.
It can have been for other media but fact is that at 19H30 on May 4 2007 there were only 3 TV vans in Praia da Luz.
Anyone who says there may have been more is being ridiculous as there are still a lot of locations where to park near 5A still available.
Unpublished Anonymous at 14 Dec 2018, 14:18:00,
Delete…and you have hit the jackpot!
There are many jackpots in the pictures (currently discussing one with NotFrog) but that one is, basically, the adding up of all of them.
Once it hits, it is quite astounding isn’t it? It practically, if not in fact, breaks the entire case!
We will publish your comment when we get to that episode. 😊
DO NOT PUBLISH DO NOT PUBLISH identified reader at 14 Dec 2018, 17:00:00.
DeleteYes, it's your comment and yes all your observations and questions are pertinent but the conclusion that you have come to is incorrect. As you understand we cannot say more at this stage.
:)
Unpublished Anonymous to Textusa at 14 Dec 2018, 18:55:00,
DeleteYou are on the right track as well!
If we get more comments like yours and other unpublished comment, we will have to publish them sooner than expected.
Does anyone know what the square tent-like/marquee type construction is, please? It seems to be an add-on to the Tapas bar..it may be irrelevant but I haven't noticed it before. Thank you.
DeleteNotFrog,
DeleteJosé Rodrigues dos Santos is very successful Portuguese TV anchor and author. Many years ago, when he started to write, I remember watching an interview about his most recent work then which focused on that tangible/intangible thing that is information.
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Rodrigues_dos_Santos
He said that his book was born because having one afternoon filmed a demonstration of a military tank, later when he saw the piece he put together he was fascinated by the fact that what he saw on the screen did not match with what he had seen with his own eyes on the ground.
There had been no intended manipulation but the fact that his cameraman made the effort to get the best angles, resulted in the news piece being more spectacular than in reality all had been.
One thing he gave as an example, was that in the news piece there seemed to be more people present than there really were. This was owed to the simple fact that the cameraman had just framed all those present and by doing that, hadn’t shown the majority of empty seats that were in the stands. Who hadn’t been in the demonstration but saw it only on TV, wouldn’t be able to know that only a few people did attend the event.
This distortion of reality fascinated him and he decided to write about it. Again, note, no intended manipulation, simply the cameraman doing his job to get the best images possible. Just doing his job properly.
From the interview (I haven’t read the book, nor can say what book it was as he has since dedicated himself to historical romances) the book took things in a different path than the one the photos of Praia da Luz show.
Rodrigues dos Santos it seems, in his book went on to investigate how the presence of cameras do alter the reality continuum because people do start to act differently when they become aware that they are being filmed. He tried to show how reality is different according to the presence of cameras.
In this tank demonstration there was no manipulation but there was distortion. Now imagine the distortion that can be achieved if manipulation is really intended. And that’s one of the many things that these Praia da Luz photos show: a news manipulation of the news itself.
Where is the media circus that we were all induced into believing that there had been the day after Maddie disappeared?
Nowhere to be seen because there wasn’t one. That simple and the pictures show it very clearly.
Portugal is in the same time-zone as the UK. Everyone knows that primetime news hour is 20H00. The photo was taken half an hour before TV Stations would be opening live. And there are only 3 TV vans.
And of these 3, 2 were in Luz since morning, SIC and CH4.
Their videos prove it. And one, SIC, very early in the morning as they captured the Tapas lot going to Portimão.
That leaves 1 TV van for: RTP, TVI, Sky News, BBC and ITV. Just to name the Portuguese and the British ones.
The Portuguese TVI, put up a very piece about it at 09:35 that morning on its TVI24 site but as far as we know, they didn’t say anything on TV at 13H00 nor at 20H00.
https://tvi24.iol.pt/algarve/madeleine/crianca-inglesa-desaparecida
Nor did RTP. In fact, we all have in our memory that Gerry with his torch and notebook with Kate beside him were the first images of the case. That was filmed when it was dark, so well after 20H00. A couple of hours, at most after the pictures were taken.
And we only saw them on May 5 because they were not aired live.
(Cont)
(Cont)
DeleteWasn’t the media supposed to be blaring about it since early morning of May 4? If we are to believe the statements of Yvonne Martin, Stephen Carpenter and the Murats that was what was supposedly happening… but where was all that media in Luz? Nowhere to be seen.
Do note that in Frog’s picture, the one taken in the morning, the TV van #3 (the one by the Block 2 pool in Rua Agostinho da Silva) is not present. It hadn’t arrived yet. But Yvonne Martin had come rushing from the other said of Lagos and Stephen Carpenter had done laps around Luz because of the news they heard, when at best, there were only 2 TV crews there.
On the T-crossing by Block 5, by the white car, one can see about a dozen people standing there. Were they the reporters, or just curious people? It they were reporters, were all of them reporters? And if all of them were reporters, can it be considered a media-storm? It can’t and it clearly wasn’t. 30 minutes before prime-time.
And yet, when one watches the videos of that first press conference, just filmed a couple of hours at most after these pictures were taken, one feels that the parking lot of Block 5 was filled with press:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeB_vGZWE5s
Just keep cameras flashing and the feeling that there were reporters piling up on each other is created. Is what we see at 19H30 consistent with the video conference? It isn’t.
But the pictures give us another media related detail: the helicopter.
Although there was clearly no major media footprint on the ground, there was a helicopter flying around taking pictures clearly related to Maddie’s disappearance.
There is clearly a disconnect between what one can see on the ground with what was deployed in the air.
It was like someone was determined to make the case a media-storm when it was far from being one. And for that to be can be because someone knew at 19H30 of May 4 2007 that Maddie would never be found.
DO NOT PUBLISH DO NOT PUBLISH at 15 Dec 2018, 09:35:00
DeletePlease allow us to publish the contents of your comments with or without your “internet ID” as you wish.
This last one is media related and we think it’s pertinent to the analysis. Thank you.
We now ask readers to go back and look at the videos of May 4 2007.
DeletePlease see how many volunteers, locals or guests, are seen in the background or together with the police, seen searching for Maddie.
We will give a hint. Locals, one, Robert Murat. Guests, one, Raj Balu.
Now understand that the importance of the photos. It's not what they show but what they don't show. What they don't show and HAD to have shown.
HAD to show according to all the stories we were told but don't. And the case just cracks wide open.
For example, where are the search parties, where is the looking at bins, yards, fields, wells, etc? Shouldn't Luz be really filled with people on the streets and everywhere?
DeleteAnother example, with so many guests there, why not a SINGLE one at the Tapas area?
We think we should now publish the comments that we have withheld:
Delete“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Scare tactics - comments continue":
What strikes me is the complete absence of any holiday makers in the OC complex. Correct me if I am wrong but I literally can't see anyone. Possibly too cold to swim or sunbathe but no tennis, no kids in the playground, no-one going anywhere, no-one just going for a stroll in the early evening.
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 14 Dec 2018, 14:18:00”
And:
“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Scare tactics - comments continue":
Hi - do you think it's odd that the photos don't show any holiday-makers around the pool area? I know T9 wouldn't be expected to be there but those guest not associated in any way might. Just a thought. Thank you.
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 14 Dec 2018, 18:55:00”
And we’re waiting for the “do not publish” reader to allow us to transcribe here the content of his comments that is pertinent to this debate.
Inez has been shadow banned so tweets no longer showing on #mccann. She is blaming Walker, but I wonder if The Gang could be to blame?
ReplyDeleteOne and the same imho
DeleteMcCannCaseTweet
ReplyDelete5m5 minutes ago
Madeleine CaseTweets
�� Retweeted The Suppressionals
#mccann Sad
Madeleine CaseTweets
�� added,
The Suppressionals
@1matthewwright1
Who is the new Carole account? #mccann
0 replies . 2 retweets 3 likes
McF still trying to convince that Inez is a fake. I wouldn't be surprised if she was the one reporting the account.
@McCannCaseTweet
ReplyDelete40m40 minutes ago
Madeleine CaseTweets
�� Retweeted The Suppressionals
#mccann Sad
Madeleine CaseTweets
�� added,
The Suppressionals
@1matthewwright1
Who is the new Carole account? #mccann
1 reply . 3 retweets 5 likes
xxMicheLLeSxxCSIx
��
��
��️
��️
��
@xxSiLverdoexx
Replying to @McCannCaseTweet
What happened to "Bot?"
I'll DM you Isabelle...... #mccann
Looks like orchestrated attempt to get rid of Carole's new account by mass-reporting it to be a bot. They are so malicious they can't resist gloating about it.
It is indeed "sad"
The fact that @1matthewwright1 asks @InezShooter directly what she said in a recent DM from her previous account, proves that he doesn't know whether it is or not, despite other account's 'certainty'.
ReplyDeleteIsabelle's campaign to convince that Inez is fake comes off the rails as Matthew finally accepts it is her, after she quotes things said in DM to him. What took him so long!? They are all brainwashed by McF, who couldn't detect her way out of a paper bag, but IS cunning enough to manipulate others.
ReplyDeleteThat is the best skill she possesses. I wish more people who joke about her transparency as an absolute fantasist would just say it openly instead of continually liking her tweets for the sheer fact that they don't want attacked by her lapdog Silverbore et al.
DeleteSlowly but surely she will be exposed.
Comment that we have censored:
ReplyDelete"Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Scare tactics - comments continue":
Michelle (censored) has now protected her tweets. Hilarious when (censored) is exposed (censored).
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 13 Dec 2018, 17:09:00"
Orders.
DeleteYes. She is happy to be told what to do, as long as she can bask in her mistress's reflected glory. How cringeworthy watching her slavish sycophancy, obsequiously offering thanks for being given a new name and avatar by the boss.
DeleteHonoured? Really? Have some self respect!
Despite her claims to be on Twitter as a voice for Madeleine, Silverdoe has locked her tweets from public view which proves she prioritises her own bruised ego first and foremost as mentioned in the previous comments section.
ReplyDeleteWe have been informed and have confirmed that Siverdoe's account no longer protected.
ReplyDeleteMinus a few tweets.
Deletehttps://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1072278974791860224
ReplyDeleteGreen Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @CarlaSpade @may_shazzy and 4 others
Just as the phone records were transposed onto spreadsheets, OC staff must have given PJ new sheets listing only the MW diners at Tapas. Clearly all the Thomas Cook guests were not banned from using the facilities. #mccann
3:56 pm - 10 Dec 2018
*****
So, Tapas had booking sheets for all clients. Maddie disappeared and they went back and redid them all, just with MW customers.
Why guests from other operators considered people of not interest (only reason for them to have been “deleted” from the records)? And why were only MW guests to be considered people of interest?
And then, having redone all the reservation sheets to include only MW guests, the Tapas decided to write up the beverage consumption the way they did.
Unicorns, according to some (by coincidence always the same ones) do exist.
Disclaimer:
ReplyDeleteWe know that it’s unnecessary to say this but we would like it to make it clear that this individual does NOT represent the blog in any way.
We have no control as to who uses our name, we can only dissociate ourselves from those who do and then publicly express opposite views to the ones the blog holds:
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1073358504168120321
Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet
Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐Retweeted Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐
I would like to thank SilverText USA for all her help. Many of my videos are downloaded and formatted by her, I then add graphics, text and the commentary... TeamWork #mccann
Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐added,
Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet
Follow >>>@xxSiLverdoexx Michelle is a fantastic researcher on the #MadeleineMccann Great Stuff!!! #mccann
3:26 pm - 13 Dec 2018
https://twitter.com/McCannCaseTweet/status/1073360294242467840
Madeleine CaseTweets 🌐 @McCannCaseTweet
Replying to @Joyousb90
Love her new name Silver Text USA Inspired by a blog mostly about her fantastic work on #mccann
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuVXf06VYAE1ZnB.jpg
3:33 pm - 13 Dec 2018
https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1073359108152139776
SiLverTextUSAxx @xxSiLverdoexx
Replying to @McCannCaseTweet
And thank you for my amazing new name and graphics Isabelle you're a star😍😍😍
I'm honoured you do amazing work for Madeleine towards the truth here for us all on #mccann, thank you! 😘😘
3:28 pm - 13 Dec 2018
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1073359503796641793
ReplyDeleteGreen Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @CarlaSpade
Do you know that you can go walkabout in Luz without actually being there & some buildings even have their name on a sign attached to a wall, visible from the road? #mccann
3:30 pm - 13 Dec 2018
*****
How interesting it is to watch the Frog trying to dissociate herself from Cristaluz and from whomever took that picture.
Like everyone walks around and memorises names of buildings. If so, why not call it Cristaluz Lote 3 because that is the name that is there to be memorised:
https://www.google.com/maps/@37.0896158,-8.7308575,3a,75y,93.52h,86.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1suitVjBbkwI_OGwnUtYFX1g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Note that this name is a street that no one walks in. Coming from the Millenium, along the Rua do Ramalhete, one turns right down the Rua Dr Agostinho da Silva (the street where Murat’s property is) to go to the centre of the Luz. The path that Derek Flack says he walked for example, or the the one TS says she walked in both directions on the different sightings.
No one, unless they’re driving, continues to walk in the Rua do Ramalhete unless one lives or is going to one of the properties in the area.
We think the Frog has forgotten she was specific about the floor and balcony. Now is suggesting it was drone footage.
It would have been more intelligent not to have been specific. But now it’s too late.
No one has done to McEff what she is doing to others. Although it would be easy to drop a word in the ears of the local competition to hubby's business about the wifey's filthy behaviour, no one has. Says a lot about who has integrity.
ReplyDeleteAnon,
DeleteAs McF husband hasn’t involved himself in the case, as far as is known, his business is his business, in both senses of the word.
Family members shouldn’t be assumed to be involved, whatever “side” the person comments from.
Yes and the fact that no one has done it even though they can is a good indication that those people who are being stalked are not the criminal types. Far from it. X
DeleteI love how you're living rent free in Michelle and Isabelle's heads, Textusa!
ReplyDeletehaha, they're even boosting your blog's SEO and internet profile free of charge, how kind of them.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DeleteI thought the same - giving the blog free publicity.
DeleteImitation is the sincerest form of flattery, is the saying.
Anonymous 14 Dec 2018, 16:49:00,
DeleteWe ask readers not to personalise things. We have not published comments by Pseudo Nym accusing Jill Havern of publishing some of the comments in this post.
We thank you for defending us with such passion but we agree with Anonymous 14 Dec 2018, 17:26:00 (thank you, for such an opportune comment) as we believe that what Anonymous 14 Dec 2018, 16:17:00 is saying is the opposite of what your comment implies: they are giving more visibility to the blog.
Silverdoe is now the 5th person to give us free publicity: Bugsy, Jules and Sade have put up a "secret agent" whatever because of us, and then of course Not Textusa who whenever he says anything, be it about the case or about tadpole fishing, makes people curious about us.
Thanks to them, people come to read and can make up their own minds about what we say.
Anonymous14 Dec 2018, 16:17:00,
DeleteMichelle seems to be on the Twitter warpath after reading your comment.
Please do not publish at 14 Dec 2018, 23:28:00,
DeleteYour comment at 14 Dec 2018, 16:49:00 has been deleted as per your request.
:)
I think you have made a positive impact on at least one person today. Hope it lasts. X
ReplyDelete"Never again will I mention you or your blog - You truly are VILE. I wouldn't tar my brush with your filth ever again if I was paid to, you disgust me textusa and I will enjoy seeing the day you get your karma, I advice all to be aware of the nastiness that blogs doing"
She advices all to be aware.
DeleteInteresting take on McF’s twitter account by someone in a group I belong to:
ReplyDeleteClara Bella shared her first post.
New Member • 5 minutes ago
We all have theories and this is based on what has been put out there by MSM and alternative media, which in fact is very hard to differentiate any longer as they’re all out for the £££ people please be aware that some cases are fiction for a reason. This Madeline case has plenty of spins and turns for a reason. The problem here is that the media reported on the case before it was investigated that's an indication that seeds needed to be planted and the case needed to be ruined. If you view it as a "story" you'll see what I mean. Also there is a twitter account called Madelinemccantweets, this account is controlled to keep everyone reading and believing that the parents are to blame.. this is what they need everyone to think so it keeps this conspiracy going, I asked the person about my ideas and had lots of questions I was blocked, unless you agree with this twitter accounts story she allows you to be part of the conspiracy, if you dare to question it then you are ignored and blocked. This for me is a RED FLAG open debate is fine, we all have a right to question everything but it's best to research and find the facts (if there is even any with the McCann case) Another RED FLAG is the money side of it that keeps being reported, I don't think it's even exchanging hands, it's just to keep the "story" alive for alternative reasons. Some ideas, were the McCanns being followed and blackmailed once Maddy had disappeared. Was Maddie even on that holiday? Have the McCanns been asked to front a "story" due to Gerry's past links to unsavoury allegations. All is not as it's being portrayed in this cover up abduction/parents done it saga.
4 Likes
10 Comments
https://twitter.com/mrjnh07/status/1073689782990106624
ReplyDeleteMrJNH @mrjnh07
Replying to @The_Truth_II @JillWillybach and 2 others
What's the #McCann 'paedophilia' theory P, exactly? Not sure I've ever seen a consistent argument propounded.
1:22 pm - 14 Dec 2018
*****
Very good point.
Can anyone provide a link to where we can read about the paedo theory? Outside the vague “there were dark powers” involved?
We don’t want names but want details as to the flux of events. Where it happened, why it happened in Luz, what was going on, why they were able to muster up all the support… basically what are the precise 'details' for the 'paedo' theory as we have done with the ‘swinging’ theory running the risk of having it scrutinised.
Also links to the sedation theory would be useful.
Thank you.
Basically a link that answers what is asked here for swinging (and has been more than answered by us) but for paedo:
Deletehttps://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1073698641947385857
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌🌸🐌🌸🐌🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @The_Truth_II @xxSiLverdoexx and
The thing about swinging is, when people have asked simple things such as, where did it take place, how did they get there etc, they get shut down.. Did it happen in the daytime, at night, or both...Were the kids in the crèche , if not ,where were they.. #McCann
1:57 PM - 14 Dec 2018
https://twitter.com/mccannscamexpos/status/1073894489117343744
DeleteBELFAST BANSHEE @mccannscamexpos
Replying to @CarlaSpade @strackers74
I think Payne is a pedo I'm entitled to my opinion as it is based on information contained within the pj files but I don't believe #MadeleineMcCann died as a result of sexual abuse now swing back over to your corner #McCann
2:56 am - 15 Dec 2018
After having said this:
https://twitter.com/mccannscamexpos/status/1071875186364952579
BELFAST BANSHEE @mccannscamexpos
The Gaspar statement clearly shows something darker, dirtier, sleaze, the blue eyeshadow picture backs up the filth the Gaspar statement indicates .... sorry that's not swinging that's raping children #McCann as children can't consent it's RAPE
1:12 pm - 9 Dec 2018
*****
So which is it?
Another interesting angle:
DeleteDo sedation theorists disregard the paedo info that is in the files?
Speaking of Yvonne Martin and the Gaspars. If you disregard what they have said, could you please explain why?
We have said they came forward to point the finger specifically at David Payne and to instill the "paedo-myth" into the case but as we believe that the sedation theorists do not subscribe our opinions, we are curious to know why they disregard the inputs of these people.
Thank you.
In terms of Twitter, most people are reluctant to mention 'the sultan of swing' Robert Murat due to pressure from JillyCL (formerly Jilly Come Lately) and her pals Isabelle McFadden, Ben Thompson, etc. A hidden truth awaits their followers.
ReplyDelete