Believe it or not, I haven’t
followed the April Jones case. I decided to detach myself from it, not because
I didn’t feel for the poor girl but because I didn’t wish to get caught up in
the collective emotional whirlwind that events such as this one do stir up.
Fortunately we’re still outraged
whenever a life is plucked away from such a young soul.
I let myself get “informed” by
the readers reactions expressed in their comments, so I don’t know under what
circumstances were charges brought against Mark Bridger.
During these last few days I was much
more interested in the McCann effect that overshadowed the case from minute
one.
First, as I said about the Tia
Sharp case, in this one right away the “McCann Curse” showed its ugly head, its
fangs and claws turned to its favourite and I must repeat myself, only prey,
the McCanns.
Like predicted, they couldn’t
support April and they couldn’t remain detached from the case. They neither came forward nor stayed
back.
Having a spokesman speaking on
their behalf about their own child is inexplicable but one can make an effort
and justify it with emotional distress but to speak through one about a tragedy
that has befallen upon others is either assuming royal status or recognizing
the impossibility of showing their face.
Second, the McCann effect
produced a collective scepticism about every possible “marketing” stunt (or
ploy) that was tried.
Everyone’s memory was jolted back
to 2007.
It’s been over 5 years and we all
saw how that exaggerated circus remains fresh in our collective mind. And we
collectively rejected the spectacle, questioned its content and form and were
suspicious of its actors.
Why? Maddie and all the falseness
around her came to mind.
Thirdly, we’re seeing murder
charges being brought upon a person without a corpse. I will not, obviously,
discuss any details, such as the particulars of dogs, about the April Jones’
case. I’m stating publicly known general facts and not making any sort of
judgment about any of them.
But I will not avoid questioning
Dr. McCann’s certainty that justice is obliged to produce a body to charge
someone with murder-
Fourthly, the question that is on
everyone’s mind: how long will the UK be able to maintain the McCanns
status of exception?
With each case, and unfortunately
others will happen, it will only enhance the fragility (as well as arrogance
and shamelessness) with which was put together the whole argument to proclaim
innocence upon those whose guilt is transparently evident.
The steadiness of their whole defence
is inversely proportional to the embarrassment caused whenever the McCann name
is mentioned in ever so similar cases or when Maddie is “brought” in for evident
comparison reasons.
The Maddie McCann case has unquestionably benchmarked these kind of cases. No way around this fact, much to the despair of the McCanns and the Black Hats.
As said and explained, no comments about the April Jones case will be read and not published
The Maddie McCann case has unquestionably benchmarked these kind of cases. No way around this fact, much to the despair of the McCanns and the Black Hats.
As said and explained, no comments about the April Jones case will be read and not published
Post Scriptum: We'd like to thank you for all the comments you readers have sent after we said they wouldn't be published. We read all with interest and will be following with further posts in due course, where comments will be published as usual.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated.
Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.
Textusa