It seems that a gentleman has met his death while engaging in the practice of an unusual, but commonly known (and practiced), sexual activity.
Let me upfront say that I think that that what is done in PRIVATE between CONSENTING and ABLE adults is no business but of their own and I’m not one to pass judgment on how people obtain pleasure in, I repeat, a CONSENTING and ABLE manner.
But Britain thinks otherwise.
Yes, you may right now say that you, like me, agree that this shouldn’t even be news, but I’m not referring to individuals, but to the attitude of the nation as a whole.
The U.K. has been through many a sex scandal, which I might add, they are, were and will be, the main fuel feeding an industry that Britain invented, and is a master at, the tabloid news.
But out of all those sex scandals, I ask, how many of those who played a part in them came out unscathed?
Better put, how many of those were NOT publicly insulted with “perversion” and “shame” right off the bat?
This gentleman, was, as the tabloid so rightfully says, a “respected jeweller Mr Webster, a Sunday league soccer chairman” who “on the day he died he told wife Jackie, 46, he was visiting an engraver.”
Instead he was “secretly visiting the Richardsons at their quiet suburban home next to a primary school”.
Apparently “Mums at the school near the Richardsons' home said they were stunned to hear of the bondage dungeon. One said: "It was such a shock because this area is so quiet and well-to-do."“
But who are the Richardsons? Well, according to the tabloids they are “Shamed ... Anne and Colin Richardson”.
Will ever Anne and Colin Richardson be able to walk in their neighborhood in peace? If they work, although by the ages referred are not likely to, how will they feel, or made to feel, there? And what about their family? What will their children / grandchildren / in-laws / parents-of-in-laws / etc., think and act towards them from now on?
Their lives ruined. Their crime? PRIVATE Pleasure.
Yes, they received money and were professional enough to have a panic button, but the tone of the article is not against prostitution, but rather in the type of the sexual activity engaged, which, as far as I know, is not illegal in any way.
I ask you, and this is the message that I would like to get across, what WOULD the Richardsons do if they COULD to hide this from the rest of the world?
What WOULD the Richardsons do, and GET OTHERS to do for them, if they had the right connections and contacts?
And if some, or all neighbors of this “so quiet and well-to-do” area were also in on this, what WOULD they do to help in whatever the Richardsons WOULD, if they COULD, ask them?
No, not saying they are, just raising the mere possibility…
If they COULD, what WOULD the Richardsons be able to get away with?
We know that “they tried to lift dad-of-two Mr Webster - but he was too heavy. And they could not release the collar because he had locked it and hidden the key in his orange boiler suit”, so at least we know that they wouldn’t go for an “abduction-scenario” cover-up…
Is this in any way related to the McCanns?
I’ll leave it up to you to judge.
No, it’s got nothing to do with a coincidence of a surname. Coincidences do happen, just not as many times as some are so hard trying to make us believe they do.