1. Introduction
It has now come the time to start proving that the Big Round Table (BRT) that the Tapas 9 (T9) allegedly used to dine from Sunday to Thursday at Tapas esplanade never existed.
Two things upfront that clearly show that it never existed is the fact is the lack of images of said BRT. The two things being the absence of them from the media and from guests who have been at Tapas before, during and after Maddie disappeared.
It’s very strange, to say the least, that there is very little imagery of the inside of the Tapas esplanade, a pivotal location in very high-profile case. It’s like the inside of that canopy has some kind of information that is as sensitive as the one inside Area 51.
Why? In our opinion because all was done to not show that there was no BRT that would seat a group of 9 for dinner for 5 days.
2. The Alberto Paredes’ photos
Even though all was done, mistakes do happen and that was what happened with the iron-curtain around the Tapas esplanade.
On Nov 1 2018, Mr Salmon tweeted this:
https://twitter.com/Tealtraum/status/1057947666657828864
“Ben Salmon @Tealtraum
Spoke to photographer Alberto Paredes this morning. His photos of Tapas restaurant (see Alamy) were taken in September 2007 #McCann
3:49 am - 1 Nov 2018”
Mr Salmon had found what we already had on Oct 15 and “informed” our readers of that in this comment in our post “It’s September 2018 – Comments continue II” :
“Textusa 15 Oct 2018, 16:10:00
We apologise to our readers for our late response to JBLittlemore's entrapment. It's in the works and it will soon be published.
This apology was just a reason for us to inform that we are currently 'talking' (which means we aren't) with photographer AP who seems to REALLY have some interesting imagery of the Tapas esplanade.
Unlike Jules - we are giving her one last chance to share publicly what she alleges to have that will definitely prove us wrong - we won't share these images only privately. We not only have no problem in sharing them publicly with all our readers, as we want to do so.
We will do it in a future post (decision taken for post instead of comment) to be published soon. But only after our reply to JBL.”
We wanted readers to know we had found something. Now the reader knows that those initials AP stand for Alberto Paredes.
3. Reactions to Mr Salmon’s tweets
Mr Salmon’s tweet was on Nov 1, at 10:49 am, at a time we were bringing over to the blog all related to the BRT and to Tapas but we didn’t bring this tweet over.
An Anonymous spotted the tweet and tried to bring it over to the blog and we didn’t allow it. This is the comment we did not publish:
“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The Frog's BRT":
https://mobile.twitter.com/Tealtraum/status/1057947666657828864
Spoke to photographer Alberto Paredes this morning. His photos of Tapas restaurant (see Alamy) were taken in September 2007 #McCann
...nothing phases this crowd ...everyone is but a call away and they all talk to them...wonder if they can phone Gerry???
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 1 Nov 2018, 11:04:00”
We didn’t allow this comment because we wanted silence around Mr Salmon’s tweet. We wanted to observe the reactions to it. Mr Salmon is a very-well known online personality, so to allege that his tweet went unnoticed would be ridiculous.
Mr Salmon followed his tweet with another, clarifying that Alberto Paredes’ photos (yes, 2) had absolutely nothing to do with the Frog’s BRT picture:
https://twitter.com/Tealtraum/status/1058095965662523394
“Ben Salmon @Tealtraum
Replying to @strackers74 @bitconfused90 and 2 others
The 'Frog BRT' as it was christened, was not taken by Paredes. Paredes took 2 pics in September that can be found on the alamy website, I can't link it as it's all copywrite, easy to find though. No idea who took the 'Frog' one. Hope that clears up confusion
1:38 pm - 1 Nov 2018”
2 photos of the esplanade, in September 2007 and neither to do with the Frog’s esplanade.
As we said, once we saw Mr Salmon tweeting about it, we observed. And days have passed and we’re not disappointed. It has, unsurprisingly, practically got no reactions to it.
In fact, there were really only 3 responses to date:
- 2H44 after Mr Salmon tweeted, from the Frog:
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1057988942316879873
“Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @Tealtraum
Oh dear- 4 months after the event. Haven't you noticed the table cloths are a different size to the ones in the earlier photo? (You are so going to regret getting involved in this (3 x crying laughing emoticon))
6:33 am - 1 Nov 2018”
- 4H11 after Mr Salmon tweeted, from Jules:
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1058010843223412736
“00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @Tealtraum
He was one of the ones i spoke to too... Very nice man...
8:00 am - 1 Nov 2018”
- 3 days 22H43 after Mr Salmon tweeted, also from Jules:
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1059030622759469056
“00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx
Morning table name buddy...
Never mind that.. Who ordered sushi at the Tapas...
#2007squad
#McCann
#sushi
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DrJuuqYXgAAkl23.jpg
2:32 am - 4 Nov 2018”
The third of these tweets, Jules at Nov 4, may not seem a response to Mr Salmon’s tweet but it is as we’ll see later.
The second tweet makes no reference to the photos Mr Salmon speaks of in the tweet but to the photographer who, as Mr Salmon said, had nothing to do with the Frog’s BRT picture.
So, in truth, after allowing a decent amount of time for reactions, it can be stated that Mr Salmon’s tweet truly only got one reaction, from the Frog and it was about tablecloths being different.
So why this silence? As can be seen on the blog, talking about the BRT continued but it seems that this particular tweet was printed in hot-coal. No one was touching it, not even its author.
It seems that all who proclaim they want nothing but the truth wanted nothing to do with it.
That includes Mr Salmon who suddenly became fearful of copyright infringements when, as we saw in the previous post, he previously had no problems in publishing a picture from Getty images in one of his tweets.
Why hasn’t Mr Salmon tried to get a follow-up to his tweet?
Was it only us who noticed that Mr Salmon failed to provide a link in his tweet to allow those reading to know what he was talking about? Just says he talked with a photographer called Alberto Paredes, who took photos of Tapas restaurant in September 2007 and then says “(see Alamy)”.
Is there a copyright issue in providing a link?
Well, there’s a reason for this absence of reaction and overall silence: the Alberto Paredes’ Alamy pictures, as we will see, contradict totally the Frog’s BRT picture.
If we were to trust Mr Salmon’s honesty and self-claimed independence, the least we should have expected from him would be to point that out. We have waited days and he hasn’t. The Frog jokes about the tablecloths and Mr Salmon stays silent.
Mr Salmon’s independence, like the independence of so many who claim to be independent, ends the moment a “line of inquiry” starts to hit home outside the T9 and/or the UK establishment. Very brave and righteous when it comes to clobbering the McCanns & Co, the UK Government and Operation Grange but when things involving others who were there in Luz appear, they become all of sudden very coy to the point of pretending not to see what they have seen.
4. The Alberto Paredes’ photos
That’s why we have waited, to make sure that no one now used the excuse that we didn’t give them time to react. We did and they didn’t.
There are 2 pictures taken by Alberto Paredes. Both can be found in the Alamy website.
This is the picture that is damning for the BRT apologists:
 |
| (webpage here) |
Very, very clearly the entire esplanade can be seen. And no BRT. Absolutely no BRT.
The other Alberto Paredes’ photo we will show later in the post. On the link above, it can be seen at the bottom of the page.
5. Comparing tables
Those arguing that the table on the right in AP’s photo is just another image of the BRT, let’s put them side by side with the Frog’s BRT and compare them:
We have numbered the poles and made the chair nearest to the camera the same size (yellow dashed line) so that the size and position of each of the tables can be considered.
AP’s table has 5 chairs around it but it can be seen that the round tables near it seat 4. The extra chair was put there for a costumer who joined.
The Frog’s BRT is BIG. One can see 7 chairs but there seems to be space for at least 1 or 2 more.
They are completely different tables. By the way, wasn’t the BRT supposed to be near the tarpaulin? Neither table is. Why? Because neither table is the BRT. The BRT never existed.
And this question is to answered:
Clearly it is the AP photo.
Frog and Jules know the BRT has never existed and they know that the AP photo shows that very clearly and that’s why they have been silent about the inside of the esplanade since Mr Salmon posted the tweet.
6. The Frog’s reaction
Neither Frog nor Jules have really been silent about the BRT. They were only silent about how the photo mentioned in Mr Salmon’s tweet shows a completely different layout than the one shown in Frog’s BRT image.
As we showed, the Frog reacted by joking about the tablecloths. And then tries to gaslight by deflecting to make the question about the lifted tablecloth to be about its shape:
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1058864764590456833
“Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @jules1602x @Tealtraum
So those square tables Tex harps on about could really be round ones covered with a square tablecloth? Blessed now - they'll be a nuisance when you hit 50. :)
4:33 pm - 3 Nov 2018”
A square tablecloth over a round top makes the top appear square? Really? In what parallel universe? In a David Copperfield show maybe but in not real life, Frog. That has only made you look ridiculous and showed how uncomfortable the surfacing of this picture has made you.
After attempting to be funny about the tablecloths, as we all know, the Frog came up with that amazing idea, seconded by JBLittlemore, that on Sunday Tapas mackled up together small round tables and then for the rest of the week Tapas put in place a proper BRT:
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1058865400358887425
“Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @CarlaSpade
It's quite clear. On the first night the group pushed smaller tables together to make a social "circle" for eating, all cosy like. Then the staff sorted them out with the BRT for the rest of the week. #mccann
4:35 pm - 3 Nov 2018”
Was the post-Sunday BRT custom-made to order in less than 24 hours just to satisfy this particular whim of those specific 9 guests who apparently had something very special about them that made Tapas management bend over backwards just to satisfy their every need and then was destroyed after they left?
But let’s imagine that the Frog is right. Let's then subtract from the Frog’s photo 5 small round tables:
One must also disregard the alleged BRT (white X) as it didn’t exist yet. There will not be many tables left for other guests who queued up in the morning, will there?
Also, do imagine the space that the 5 tables above would occupy when mackled together. Note how small are the tables in the “Sunday” of the drawing above in comparison with the size of the tables crossed out in the picture. Is it realistic? It may not be but a Frog has said that “It's quite clear” and she’s absolutely right as it is very clear that she’s just making it all up.
Making it up is something that’s becoming quite a habit when it comes to prove that the BRT existed, as we have witnessed lately. The BRT, one BIG object that one would expect would be very easy to prove it existed.
What matters to retain is that the Frog acknowledges having seen the photo but speaks only of the tablecloths when mentioning it or does speak about the BRT but avoids Alberto Parede’s picture altogether.
7. Jules’ reaction 1 - Sushi
But the most interesting reactions came from Jules. We will start with her last tweet, the sushi one.
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1059030622759469056
“00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx
Morning table name buddy...
Never mind that.. Who ordered sushi at the Tapas...
#2007squad
#McCann
#sushi
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DrJuuqYXgAAkl23.jpg
2:32 am - 4 Nov 2018”
To those reading the tweet, most likely that picture was totally meaningless. It isn’t but anyone looking at it outside the right context – which Jules fails to give on purpose – no link can be established between it and the Maddie case, much less Tapas.
Jules, with the 3 hashtags she uses in her tweet seems to imply that she wants us to think there’s a link between the sushi and Tapas: #2007squad, #McCann and #sushi.
Did Tapas serve sushi?? That’s a novelty! To find 11 years later that it did, to say the least, is amazing! What else did they serve that we didn’t know? Thai? Chinese? Indian? All of them?
Wow, what a restaurant Tapas was! We have found out that they served take-outs without publicising it anywhere and now, also without any publicity we find that they served sushi!
Only it didn’t. Even if Jules photo turned out to be from Tapas. Jules in her anxiety to be clever overlooked a little fact: what is pictured is not sushi but kebabs.
Any more sushi jokes? Feeling quite stupid now, aren’t you? Blame it on Jules.
If we were to believe that Frog’s BRT image portrays Tapas as it was every day, then it would be quite posh. If it served sushi as Jules has tried to make us believe then posh would be understating the quality of the restaurant. Table-skirts and sushi would indeed justify queues in the morning.
But even if that were so, and it wasn’t, still to be explained would be why only MW guests had the privilege of being allowed to dine there:
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1058880681898635264
“Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @SadeElisha86 @JBLittlemore @CarlaSpade
Apparently "one" now believes the BRT was not in situ on the Sunday night based on Jane's recall. Why does no-one ever factor in the fact Thomas Cook guests were also allowed to use the Tapas Bar to eat???????
5:36 pm - 3 Nov 2018”
How is the Jules kebab photo linked to the Maddie case?
It comes from the Alamy website, the same from where Mr Salmon tweeted about:
 |
| (original webpage here) |
https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-disappearance-of-madeleine-mccann-cook-fernando-cabaco-served-kate-17521510.html
The title says: “Disappearance of Madeleine McCann Cook Fernando Cabaco served Kate and Gerry McCann and their friends at Tapas Bar Restaurant - Image ID: B0E4T6”
And on the bottom of the page: “More information: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann Cook Fernando Cabaco served Kate and Gerry McCann and their friends at Tapas Bar Restaurant in The Ocean Club Resort the night she disappeared PRAIA DA LUZ Algarve Portugal”
Cabaco is not a Portuguese surname, Cabaço is.
So, basically, all Jules has shown is that Tapas served kebabs. But has she?
There’s a likelihood that it’s not even from Tapas. Fernand Cabaço is not in the list of employees.
In our post “Tourism Diet” we noted that the Ocean Club hired 44 new people up to May 1st to reinforce the 6 who worked there:
“8. Restaurant & Bar (50 workers – 44 new)
1. Luis Miguel de Sousa Barros (01/04/1998)
2. Luis Miguel Pinguinha M Furtado (19/04/1999)
3. Natalia Pasa (01/08/2003)
4. Valter Manuel de Freitas Mendes (10/06/2004)
5. Hayley May Crawford (02/12/2004)
6. João Pedro Ramos Agapito (01/04/2006)
7. Arlindo Efifânio Gonçalves Fernandes Peleja (01/03/2007)
8. David José Arauto Veloso dos Santos (12/03/2007)
9. Joaquim José Moreira Baptista (12/03/2007)
10. Luisa Maria Câmara Todorov (12/03/2007)
11. Maria José dos Santos Rosa (14/03/2007)
12. Peter Kreuzer (14/03/2007)
13. Aritson Henrique Soares Santos Lúcio (19/03/2007)
14. Cátia Sofia da Costa (19/03/2007)
15. Maria de Fátima de Sousa Fernandes (19/03/2007)
16. Maria Isabel Ferreira Machado (19/03/2007)
17. Miguel Salcedas Coelho (19/03/2007)
18. Nuno Gonçalo Marques Vicente dos Ramos Bernardo (19/03/2007)
19. Ricardo Alexandre da Luz Oliveira (19/03/2007)
20. Sofia Bento Barbosa (19/03/2007)
21. Tiago Rocha Barreiros (19/03/2007)
22. Antonio Manuel Gingeira (20/03/2007)
23. Sandra Maria dos Santos Lourenço (25/03/2007)
24. John Sholto Young (26/03/2007)
25. Maria Manuela Antónia José (26/03/2007)
26. Nelson Luis da Silva Rodrigues (26/03/2007)
27. Pedro Alexandre Gonzaga Ribeiro (26/03/2007)
28. Ecatarina Dobrioglo (27/03/2007)
29. Alexandra Nicole de Souso (01/04/2007)
30. Pedro Miguel Gonçalves Albino Silva Bandarra (01/04/2007)
31. Ana Marilia Do Carmo Silva (02/04/2007)
32. Cecilia Paula Dias Firmino Carmo (02/04/2007)
33. Jorge Miguel Trindade Cintra (02/04/2007)
34. Stefan Kotsev Todorov (02/04/2007)
35. Tiffany Carol Horner (03/04/2007)
36. Jerónimo Tomás Rodrigues Salcedas (04/04/2007)
37. Maria de Jesus Rodrigues de Almeida (05/04/2007)
38. David Miguel Marino Barroso (09/04/2007)
39. Gustavo César Cabral Campos (09/04/2007)
40. Paula Cristina da Costa Vieira (09/04/2007)
41. Virginia Vieira Monteiro (09/04/2007)
42. Vera Lúcia Rodrigues de Almeida Valério (11/04/2007)
43. Svetlana Starkova Vitorino (19/04/2007)
44. Sergio António Sandoval Janini (20/04/2007)
45. Eduardo João Oliveira Martins (21/04/2007)
46. Maria da Piedade dos Reis João Batista (23/04/2007)
47. Auzela Tania Damião André Bingui (26/04/2007)
48. Tiago Filipe Pinheiro de Freitas (26/04/2007)
49. Joelson Fábio Soares Santos Lúcio (27/04/2007)
50. Alayn Hernandez Fundora (01/05/2007)”
No Fernando Cabaço.
And to say that Mr Cabaço was only hired afterwards is to overlook the fact that in the photo it’s said that he served the McCanns.
Plus, there’s no statement from Mr Cabaço in the files.
If we are to believe what is said on the Alamy website based on what is said there on the pictures, then we have another Fernando Cabaço:
 |
| (original webpage here) |
And we are also to believe that Maddie and Gerry were served at Paraíso:
 |
| (original webpage here) |
It seems that Jules has overlooked the fact that in September 2007, being a very-high profile case, no one dreamed that what they said would one day be scrutinised against the PJ Files. That includes all those who spoke “freely” for the files as well.
Jules just trying to be clever and ending up being her usual self.
But this sushi episode is important for 2 reasons.
Firstly, because it shows that Jules visited and browsed the site tweeted by Mr Salmon but decided to tweet only about something completely unrelated to the photo that shows clearly that the BRT never existed.
Secondly, because it shows that when Jules thinks she has a trump, she plays it. That means that the secret she claims to have is nothing but bluster as we have been saying all along.
7. Jules’ reaction 2 - Photographer
As we said 4H11 after Mr Salmon first tweeted, Jules tweeted this:
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1058010843223412736
“00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @Tealtraum
He was one of the ones i spoke to too... Very nice man...
8:00 am - 1 Nov 2018”
Then, 5H38 minutes after Jules tweeted, Mr Salmon tweets that Alberto Paredes had nothing to do with the CMTV/Frog’s BRT picture:
https://twitter.com/Tealtraum/status/1058095965662523394
“Ben Salmon @Tealtraum
Replying to @strackers74 @bitconfused90 and 2 others
The 'Frog BRT' as it was christened, was not taken by Paredes. Paredes took 2 pics in September that can be found on the alamy website, I can't link it as it's all copywrite, easy to find though. No idea who took the 'Frog' one. Hope that clears up confusion
1:38 pm - 1 Nov 2018”
Jules had clearly jumped the gun.
Now it’s not only one photographer, the CMTV linked one, as we all thought, but photographers. And this other photographer (are there more?), Alberto Paredes, has absolutely nothing to do with CMTV/Frog’s BRT picture, so where did Jules get Alberto Paredes’ name from?
Was it from the Alamy website? That would mean that she had seen the Alberto Paredes photos and didn’t reveal that? If she thought the BRT was shown in both photos, why didn’t she show it? And if she thought that was the really the case, why didn’t she react to Mr Salmon’s photo?
In a comment 12 Oct 2018, 11:59:00 in our post “It’s September 2018 – Comments continue II” we parodied how Jules had talked to her “photographer” who has given her THE secret about the BRT.
It was absolutely ridiculous but nothing is so ridiculous that it cannot be made even more ridiculous, paraphrasing one of Murphy’s laws. Is there any question that we were spot on when we said in our post “The Frog’s BRT”:
“Did that make sense? Because if it did, it is because the reader without realising has just figured out that the Frog is the ‘photographer’ Jules alleges to have talked about.
Jules has nothing up her sleeve other than the Frog. That simple and that little.”
8. Paris Match BRT
The Alberto Paredes’ photos also help to debunk 2 BRTSs: Silverdoe’ BRT and the Paris Match BRT. Both involve a little round table about which Silverdoe has raised the possibility of being extendable,
This is the second photo that Mr Salmon tweets refer to:
 |
| (original webpage here) |
Very clearly, not an extendable table. It has a hole in the centre, presumably for a sunshade if used outside.
This is the Paris-Match BRT, represented in this photo:
The picture shows Silverdoe BRT. Taken from Paris-Match BRT. Allegedly, the camera was set on the BRT when the picture was taken:
 |
| (photo from here) |
Getty images states very clearly that the camera is set on the BRT but of the table itself we apparently have but a glimpse of the edge. We pointed this out because if this was true, then the people sitting at Silverdoe’s BRT would block the view to the apartment.
But, as we now know by looking at the Paredes’ photo, there simply isn’t a Paris-Match BRT. Between the bar and Silverdoe’s BRT there is only an empty space.
However, the reporter said something that wasn’t. Why?
9. Silverdoe’s BRT
We have seen that it was not extendable. But we want to show that how raising the possibility of it even being the BRT is quite disrespectful to Mr Amaral.
If we look at Mr Amaral’s book, it’s very clear he points to where the BRT was supposed to be. This has a very logical and a very simple reason and we will address it when we deal with the Sr Amaral/PJ BRT and answer in a future post the question that was put to us in this comment:
“Anonymous 14 Oct 2018, 22:49:00
Are you suggesting that in all the visits to the Tapas to take statements etc the PJ never once asked where the McCanns were sitting?”
For now, it’s clear that Mr Amaral has an arrow pointing to a table near the tarpaulin. Neither Frog’s nor Silverdoe’s BRT are anywhere near where Mr Amaral has pointed.
We know that the Frog would have no problem in calling Mr Amaral incompetent but were rather surprised seeing Silverdoe doing that after accusing us of this:
https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1058382576379969549
“xxMicheLLeSxx @xxSiLverdoexx
Now I am going to say this once and once only. I'm not jumping through table hoops for anyone - I believe in GONCALO AMARAL and the PJ files and the truth - In his book there's the pics and in the files. placing doubt on both is IMO disgraceful
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/AMARALS_BOOK.htm
#mccann
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DrAhOZvX0AAhtiE.jpg
8:37 am - 2 Nov 2018”
https://twitter.com/xxSiLverdoexx/status/1058989075460448256
“xxMicheLLeSxx @xxSiLverdoexx
The more snide comments and discrediting of the PJ and Amaral you do textusa is more vindication for others here who you've persecuted, bit of free advice, ta ta I won't be responding again the more you goad the more of a twat you'll look #JustSaying #mccann
12:47 am - 4 Nov 2018”
Suggesting the BRT could have been a table that Mr Amaral has clearly not pointed to is saying that one simply doesn’t care what Mr Amaral had to say, isn’t that so?
And isn’t it showing the exact same disrespect for Mr Amaral by showing support to Jules and the Frog when they say that the BRT is not where he pointed to in his book? We think it is.
But Silverdoe’s BRT is very useful to prove a point: it's very easy to prove that it existed. That small round table just outside the canopy as one heads from the entrance to the bar is easily provable that it was there. No one questions its existence. No one had any problem in photographing it or see a picture of it be made public. A much smaller object than the alleged BRT.
It did exist. Now in its place there something much bigger, clearly put there to convince guests that was there the T9 had their dinners.
Again, another useful object: how hard would it be to prove that big octogonal table existed? It would be very easy, it’s so big that it cannot be missed. To keep it from appearing whenever the esplanade was pictured, would be very difficult to do, wouldn’t it? It would.
10. BRT and swinging
When there are no arguments against the truth, the last resort to fight it is to try and ridicule it:
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1050153891680145414
“00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @JBLittlemore
100% yes...
Now that's out the way what about Operation #CillitBang
Another thing... I go to restaurants as we all do, should we consider it a swinging venue if it has BRT's .. for future reference...?
#McCann
3:39 pm - 10 Oct 2018”
One thing we have been wrongfully accused of is that we say that the fact the BRT didn’t exist, means there was swinging.
We don’t say that because that’s not we believe. The same goes when it’s said that we base all our theory on the fact the table doesn’t exist. That is not true.
When we show that the table didn’t exist, we have only proved that the Tapas dinners didn’t exist.
The fact these dinners didn’t exist means that people have lied about them. Upfront and most obvious are the T9 and the Tapas staff.
But not only them. Also, the guests who have allowed their names to be used on the reservation sheets, as well as the Ocean Club management who created them.
Lastly, all those who have promoted the idea that there were queues to reserve each day have also lied.
All of the above is factual and we have not mentioned the word swinging. Because, as facts, they are independent of any thesis about what happened. Any theory about what happened has to fit in all facts, and not pretend that they don’t exist because they don’t fit a theory.
What we have done with the swinging theory is to see if the facts above fit or not in the theory. They do, so we keep believing in our theory. If they didn’t then we would have to revise our beliefs. Facts don’t change, beliefs do when there are new facts that justify that change.
But if the facts above fit other theories, then they should be used. If they don’t fit, then it’s the theory that has to be abandoned and not the facts. No matter how much one tries to ignore them, the facts will always be there regardless of how much money one wastes in smokescreens.
Those who don’t believe in swinging – which is their right which we respect – looking at the evidence we have shown, if they are honest once they realise that we are being truthful, they will embrace it into their own theories. If the facts don’t fit, then they must revise their position.
Unfortunately, people have pinned their colours to the mast of a theory and then refuse to change under the fear of looking ridiculous, when by holding to a tattered rag is what is making them ridiculous.
Before we are accused of the same, we don’t ignore any evidence that supports other theories.
We have previously expressed why we distance ourselves from them. Note, we do not deny the facts that support them.
Let’s just use the empty CATS files as an example. We are using it because a parallel can be established with the BRT because both issues deal with absence. The CATS files with the absence of documents and the BRT with the absence of a table.
We acknowledge the file is empty. We don’t invent possible papers that could be inside it. We don’t say that the CATS folder is not the one it is said to be but one that was next to it. We don’t ridicule people who say it is empty, we don’t make childish jokes about it being empty.
Where we differ from the believers in the paedo theory is about the explanation as to why it is empty. Not if it was empty. They say the documents were taken out of it, we say no documents were put in it ever. We disagree, but do not disagree on the fact, only on what that fact may mean.
Likewise, all who disagree with the swinging theory should do the same with the BRT. They should not deny it didn’t exist because it’s more than evident that it didn’t. They must, if they are really serious about their beliefs, find a different explanation from ours as to why all those people lied.
So, to all those who say that our theory revolves around the BRT existing or not, it doesn’t. The BRT is just one of many factors. If we were to sum up into a single factor what sustains our theory, we would say it is the fact that many people lied and who were not expected to lie.
We look at this fact and ask ourselves, would they lie to protect a paedophile who murdered a 4 yr old? We say they wouldn’t but respect all those who think they would.
11. Conclusion
The BRT doesn’t exist. Has never existed.
In the following posts we will address the various BRTs out there. Which we have said, there are loads of them that it’s hard to keep track and will likely miss one or two.
This number only reinforces the fact that there was no BRT.
The BRT apologists have become what the abduction apologists were back in the first years: they come up with the most absurd theories to justify what everyone has realised by now is something as real as the abduction.
In fact, the story of the burglar behind the door while Gerry was in the toilet is now becoming more plausible, hearing the wiggling, turning, squirming and Brunt-supporting tactics we’ve seen to try to make the BRT real.
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1059081069310427136
ReplyDelete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @Anvil161Anvil16 @Millsyj73
What did they eat every night then Anvil and where did they eat instead...? Or were they all on class A and didn't need feeding...? #McCann
5:52 am - 4 Nov 2018
*****
Are you serious Jules?
Aren’t you aware that your lord and master NT says that Praia da Luz was FILLED with wonderful restaurants, that being one of the reasons, if not the main one, he gives for so many people wanting to visit Praia da Luz at that time of the year??
You people need to synch watches!
Hi. You need to get out more.
ReplyDeleteWe published your comment so readers can go and visit you Google+ profile and see this picture you published on Jun 24, 2014 of Mr Amaral wearing a dunce hat:
Deletehttps://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-ELIyJJXl-kQ/U6n4lKr380I/AAAAAAAAAH8/sCdiumYvvDo/w530-h530-n/GoncaloAmaralb.jpg
Jules has replied. First on Twitter:
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1060502064483233793
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
The pics were taken at different angles by 2 different people.. The counter can be seen in one..
#McCann
https://twitter.com/i/status/1060502064483233793
3:59 am - 8 Nov 2018
******
Jules and has also replied on NT. Has used the alias “eu sou nojento…” which tranlated is “I’m disgusting” being “nojento” for the male gender:
eu sou nojento...8 November 2018 at 12:31
Hi NT.. if I can just leave this here for Tex please, who has gone beyond losing the plot.. And, might accidentally on purpose miss my tweet..
The 2 pics are 1: taken at different angles.. 2: By different photographers.. 3: 2 different dates..
The Tapas counter can clearly be seen in Frogs BRT.. I'm not even going to go into sushi..
One last thing.. Tables can move.. Even BIG ones..
Replies
Not Textusa8 November 2018 at 13:03
Of course! I am just reading it, but I am only about 2ft in. Another 12ft to go!
eu sou nojento...8 November 2018 at 13:28
Thanks.. :D
I feel your pain..
*****
Really?
The Frog’s BRT picture is taken from a different angle? Really?
And by different photographers as Mr Salmon said? Really?
And on different dates? Really?
Wow.
Don’t go into sushi. Stick rather to kebabs.
Jules, has thought best she should correct us. On NT:
Delete“eu sou nojento...8 November 2018 at 16:54
ele é nojento refers to the male gender... Tex can't get anything right..
Off to eat my kebab.. With salad.. I hate sushi..”
*****
Next time we will use Japanese to write this: “[Jules] Has used the alias “eu sou nojento…” which tranlated is “I’m disgusting” being “nojento” for the male gender”.
To clarify this nojento v gender thing.
DeleteIn Portuguese, when referring to a man, one says “ele é nojento” (he’s disgusting) and when referring to a woman, one says “ela é nojenta” (she’s disgusting).
So to decode what Jules meant to say with her “eu sou nojento” was to say that Textusa is a man.
Powerful piece, Textusa/sisters. Blows their lies out of the water. Expect the usual lick spittle bile from the usual suspects.
ReplyDeleteIt's all they have. They're getting rinsed all over the show. If it wasn't such a tragic case it really would be comical. The lengths they are willing to go to, to try and prove black is white whilst being pretendy seekers of truth reeks of desperation. Keep going sisters, the weakness of their defence is illuminating.
DeleteI am fairly new to your blog, not because I disagree with your theories I just prefer Twitter & FB. However, the BRT has been talked about before but recently it's been non-stop on Twitter. I didn't understand the relevance or hold an opinion.This post has finally explained it so thank you.
ReplyDeleteIt also makes complete sense to me now why the same people, day in day out, are at pains to contradict you. They obviously want people to dismiss it for a reason. If they thought your opinion was so ridiculous and you are so "deluded" they would surely just ignore you?
I'd like to personally thank Ben T for drawing so much attention to you as I now know that you are indeed here for the right reasons. Justice for Maddie.
You seem to unnerve him so I will be reading your blog religiously from now on.
Thanks Textusa. Agree, there was no Big Round Table at the Tapas bar on the night (the one and only night) that the Mc Canns and friends dined there. However badly some people want it to have been there, and have gone to great lengths to show how much they want it to have been there, it simply wasn't there. I didn't need convincing of this in the first place, but if I had needed convincing … you did it!
ReplyDeleteWe usually (don’t think we have ever) don’t promote NT’s blog here. But we recommend that readers visit his latest post and read for themselves how this post seems to be affecting him:
ReplyDeletehttp://nottextusa.blogspot.com/2018/11/big-round-fucking-table.html
We would say that defending Brunt is not a good look…
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1060619747782549504
ReplyDelete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog @Anvil161Anvil16
Have you seen their new piece...
11:47 am - 8 Nov 2018
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1060638965185892357
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @jules1602x @Anvil161Anvil16
Yes :). There is an acceptance that "my" photo was taken on 4th May 2007 but an absolute denial the BRT was there. Angles & spaces rule OK.
1:03 pm - 8 Nov 2018
*****
Oh, yes. We are totally and absolutely convinced that it was on May 4. The fact that it was on May 4 is VERY IMPORTANT. So, so very important.
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1059179960022323200
ReplyDeleteGreen Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @zampos @adlyd_meg
Nevertheless, the Smith family evidence remains the linchpin to the antis belief of parental culpability alongside the equally dismissed cadaver dog alerts. #mccann
12:25 pm - 4 Nov 2018
*****
Equally dismissed, according to the Frog:
- “the Smith family evidence”
- “cadaver dog alerts”
The Frog who has also said this:
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1058871684546154497
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @CarlaSpade
I will never understand you in a million years, Carla. There is no evidence of swinging involving MW guests & no evidence of Madeleine's death, accidental or otherwise. #mccann
5:00 pm - 3 Nov 2018
*****
Can anyone tell the difference between what the Frog believes in and what Pamela Gurney does?
It’s so interesting to see alleged antis cosying up to the Frog, isn’t it?
And Mr Salmon’s reply:
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/Tealtraum/status/1060666745164304384
Ben Salmon @Tealtraum
For Text: My rule of thumb is that if it's on google images (as quoted MW/GM pic was), it's fair game. If I can ONLY find it on a stock website, I'm safer saying where 2 find it. I've not engaged in brt debate, just sourced images, tired of others not doing & monotony on #McCann
2:53 pm - 8 Nov 2018
When Ben S and Jules spoke to Paredes, why not ask for permission to use his photos?
DeleteThen they could either go ahead and use them, or say Paredes didn’t agree to their use.
Anonymous 9 Nov 2018, 12:58:00,
DeleteFor someone who "just sourced images, tired of others not doing & monotony on #McCann" the link to the Alamy webpages where the 2 photos were, would be expected, so people could see them.
In the post above, we have acknowledged Alamy fully and have provided readers with the links where the pictures could be seen.
Seeing as I am included in this, I'd like the opportunity to make some points clear?
ReplyDelete1 - I don't give a damn about the tables.
2 - I don't play "Tit for tat" like you clearly do - I am on Goncalo Amaral's side all the way and this is why....
3 - My points were thus - 1 There WERE round tables in there end of AND it WAS possible to have an extending one AND I go by the PJ files, it's you, not I denying there was a big enough table there yet you try to imply I am......Exactly?
You have just contradicted yourself whilst trying to make it seem like I am "Anti Amaral?" you are trying to prove there was NO round tables like in his book and in the PJ files.
I am the one saying I stand by both hence, I will NOT be playing your foolish games.
Ego over rationality??
P.S - Everyone knew about Walker's google account was revealed months ago - You've revealed nothing, Bugsy already did :) https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/962388601450455040
I hope he doesn't mind me adding the link, but when one like yourself textusa tries to be as egomanical as yourself? I hope one understands WHY I've added it - Now, I'll stay on twitter tweeting other facts other than keep getting drawn into Bennett's nonsensical Smithman saga and Tablegate and you stay here, taking screenshots, NEVER twist my words again, this WILL go on twitter also, screenshots after all a "Gals" Best friend.
Team MADELEINE And Amaral, AND Brenda. Shame on you Textusa with respect, I thought you were better than this!
PS - If you weren't so arrogant and wrong I'd have told you all about the "Sushi" IF you were a nicer person, or is that now "Sushigate" along with "Smithgate" and "Tablegate?"
ReplyDeleteBut nahhhhhhh, I'll leave you wondering, have a good day! Excuse me for not adding before, from Silverdoe chief troll owner of a non BRT!
Lol norabatty, silverdoe and michelle, with blogs like these, you could be advised to get some sleep love.
Deletehttp://xmichellesx.blogspot.com/2018/09/who-are-real-trolls-in-mccann-world.html
https://therealmccanntrolls-therawtruth.blogspot.com/2018/10/happy-halloween-pampam-gurney-head.html
Awww sweetie, it's not just me, there's a few of us doing that blog, thought you knew?
DeleteThat blog is for every person the pro McCann's have wronged, that was just MY entry, sorry to disappoint... I'm not the one arguing constantly about tables sweetie.
I'm curious, and proud of the blog by the way, it's time the pros got a taste of their own medicine after what they done to Brenda, and others sadly many others have contributed to the blog, it isn't just mine, I just helped set it up, if no one likes it that's their choice, I won't be belittled for it though.
DeleteAnd if I cared what people thought about me, I'd have stayed quiet a long time ago, and if I cared what people now about me, I'd have gone, I care about neither, I do care about the fact that the pros are the vilest of creatures who deserve to be shamed for what they have done, I encourage if ANYONE wishes to say something on there how they feel because of them, DM me, as textusa has said themselves, we all have a choice on what we do and don't read, it's NOT my blog, it's every ones, it's not just my words, it's every ones and reveal what you wish about me, it a shame sometime's to me that respect seems to be a one way street. As for the sushi? Type in #mccann sushi scroll down, hope that helps, no secret, no code, I'm not interested in blog wars, personal info throwing, name throwing, theories, but I will stand up for my friends and what I personally feel is wrong, Hope that clears a few things up, if I cared I wouldn't have answered in this name, I'll leave you with that..... :) Respect to all as I said, shame it's not returned at times.....
Unpublished Anonymous at 9 Nov 2018, 15:06:00,
DeleteThis post is about the BRT not about that blog or Silverdoe. You have provided the link, people can go there, read it and judge for themselves. We have given Silverdoe to defend herself and let’s leave things at that.
We ask readers to focus on the subject of the post.
Thank you and hope you understand.
Yes, I can understand that, sorry for trying to distract from the point. It can be tricky to keep up with it all when you have people up all hours, in need of recuperating sleep!
Deletehttps://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1060810780503879680
ReplyDelete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @Anvil161Anvil16
Look love.. I also know sushi from kebab.. You totally missed other posts where food at the Tapas was being discussed.. I was called disgusting on that blog.. Get it now...? Shove your table where a monkey shoves it's nuts.. The.End.. #McCann
12:26 am - 9 Nov 2018
*****
If we were to call you disgusting, we would say ‘nojenta’ instead of the ‘nojento’ you used.
Care to share which posts food at Tapas was discussed?
Oh dear! So Jules WAS trying to say "I am disgusting" after all, but didn't realize that the adjective must agree in gender and number with the noun it describes. Apparently her Portuguese is only as good as Google Translate, much like her BFF The Frog's ;)
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 9 Nov 2018, 10:35:00,
DeleteThe tweet from Jules above shows how when one is under pressure from the facts and to try to distract that one is not in the possession of them, one takes the metaphorical water cannon discharging torrents of abuse to the protesters and tries to drown out their words. A monkey, as far as we know, shoves nuts into his mouth.
It seems that when Jules used the alias “eu sou nojento...”/”I’m disgusting” at NT we gave her more credit than we should have.
It never crossed our minds that when she was using a word referring to male gender, she would be speaking about herself.
When we read the “eu sou nojento”, she was being ironic and unsurprisingly taking a side in the ongoing gender guerrilla around Textusa. Basically, those who don’t like us, say that Textusa is a man and those who like us refer to Textusa as a woman.
So we took use of the word “nojento” as just another swipe at Textusa.
It seems that it was not the case. It was because, as her tweet clearly expresses (“I was called disgusting on that blog.. Get it now...?”), was a response to this comment by Anonymous 6 Nov 2018, 14:19:00:
“Jules is jumping over and back from NT to Twitter. On NT she really shows her disgusting side. On Twitter she likes to fuck around and play coy.”
It seems then that she was whining and referring to herself but, confusing kebabs with sushi again, got her genders wrong.
If one types “I’m disgusting” in Google translate, one gets “Eu sou nojento”.
Why is this important? Because it shows, again, that Jules did not speak to any Portuguese photographer and so the mystery as from who the Frog got the picture known as the Frog’s BRT continues to be unsolved.
Jules, you can now ask the person who gave Frog that picture to write you a passage in Portuguese so you can show how fluent you are. If not him/her than just ask one of the many Portuguese judases of the case.
Jules is now (as if…) BFFs with the dog-denier, Smith family doubter, Malinka supporter and abduction apologist Frog, seems to be devoid of any sense of shame, as she continues to put out tweets like this:
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1060811198357217280
“00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog @Anvil161Anvil16
I'm not contacting any more photographers lol...3 was enough.. (sunglasses emoticon)
12:27 am - 9 Nov 2018”
It was never funny and now is even stopping to be pathetic. Jules should now just cringe in embarrassment.
PS – The Portuguese for Frog is Rã, not Sapo. Sapo is toad. As you know.
All this work going into the non existent BRT. This isn't truth seeking, it's truth suppression activism. Funny game for supposed Madeleine supporters. If we all had a pound for the times they say they are done with Textusa yet still return with their bile we'd all be well off.
ReplyDeleteNot Textusa seems to thrive on trolling McCann sceptics. Reading the replies to his "deleted by author" comments on Cristobell's blog, I would say he was trolling antis along with disparaging GA's theories. http://cristobell.blogspot.com/2016/02/why-i-wont-support-richard-hall-videos.html?spref=tw Time was when the "antis" knew that NT was a wrong 'un, but the Johnny & Jane-come-latelies to the case, (and the pretendies) think he is the Second Coming for some reason. talk about hoodwinked!
ReplyDeleteFrom "FB Anon":
ReplyDelete"How convenient, just when people on twitter are becoming polarised about the BRT, and Michelle Silverdoe makes it clear that she doesn't believe in your theory at all Textusa, some "anon" posts an insulting comment about Michelle on the NT site. Not Textusa "allows it through" for some reason, then our Marvellous Misogynist, Super Sexist, Not Textusa, comes to her defence! Sade and Jules also add their support with Jules saying how lovely she is. (How do they know? Have they met?) If NT only deals with FACTS why did he bother to publish the conveniently timed insult? It hasn't added anything to the argument. Or are the Lick-Spittles trying to show what a great gang they are in their gushing support of Michelle?"
From NT:
Delete"Not Textusa31 October 2018 at 18:24
Anne, your posts are always welcome.
I try to publish every comment unless it is:
1. Abuse aimed at another poster
2. Libel or gratuitously offensive.
If anyone ever feels this has not been fairly applied, they are welcome to submit another comment or email me."
*****
We think Silverdoe should email NT in protest for having allowed that comment.
That said, we condemn that comment, as anyone should.
Who supports me or not is their choice, perhaps that's the difference? :) just like I make MY own choices in life, another difference.
DeleteAnd I told you to knock yourself out with my comments, care to show where I've complained PERSONALLY about copyright? I'll wait....... :)
From "FB Anon":
ReplyDelete"BIG ROUND FUCKING Table shouts NT. Anyone who doesn't believe it's round SHOULD BE SECTIONED he says. Oh dear then, as Anne Guedes describes it as OVAL!!!!"
@jules1602x
ReplyDelete1m1 minute ago
More
Hi Tex... I don't use Google translate love, it's about as reliable as a chocolate poker... You've taken the whole thing out of context again... Who said I, actually it doesn't matter...
#McCann
Translation: "Of course I used Google Translate but I can't dig myself out of this one, so I'm just going to brush it aside & hope it goes away."
Frog will be along later to come to Jules' aid :)
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1060665251283300352
ReplyDelete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog @Anvil161Anvil16
The table is having it... (laughing enoticon)
2:47 pm - 8 Nov 2018
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1060665544867831808
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @jules1602x @Anvil161Anvil16
That'll be the octagonal one I assume, seeing as the big round one doesn't exist?
2:49 pm - 8 Nov 2018
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1060665739370225670
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
FollowFollow @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog @Anvil161Anvil16
The 5 small ones that were used the first night... (sceptical emtoticon)
2:49 pm - 8 Nov 2018
******
Frog,
If the BIG round one existed on Sunday, why then, as per your suggestion, mackle up the 5 small ones into a BIG circle for the group on that night?
So, according to you the BIG round one didn't exist, so we were correct in crossing it out for that night, weren't we?
I’ve been to a lot of weddings where tables and chairs are decorated like in Frog’s BRT pic.
ReplyDeleteThey are for one-off functions, because if anything is spilled, the table skirts will be cleaned after table dismantled after the event.
Can you imagine the mess if used by kids for meals for 4 days running?
And why weren’t they there on the previous day when they first arrived?
Did they set up the BRT with skirts, then do the same for the other tables on first night, or were the T9 on the only decorated table? If so, when were the other tables decorated and why all gone by September?
Anonymous 9 Nov 2018, 16:12:00,
DeleteThank you! Finally someone brought up the difference of decorations between the 2 photos!
We have seen in the post that the Frog has noticed that too, that the tablecloths were different.
As she seems to know so much about all that was going on at Tapas, maybe the Frog can tell us when the table skirts were abandoned and why. That would be interesting to know.
https://twitter.com/EricaCantona7/status/1060866504370122752
ReplyDeleteKaren Lowe Sanders @EricaCantona7
Replying to @PollyGraph69
No of course not but GA himself said : how they were seated round the table, what they drank, what they ate, how they were dressed, everything is important. So don’t you think he will have checked everything plus of course there is a photo of said table in May 2007
4:07 am - 9 Nov 2018
*****
This goes in line with this comment we received:
“Anonymous 14 Oct 2018, 22:49:00
Are you suggesting that in all the visits to the Tapas to take statements etc the PJ never once asked where the McCanns were sitting?”
It seems that some are clinging for dear life that the Frog’s BRT photo was taken on May 4 as if that proves anything. It doesn’t but as it’s the ONLY thing they have (strange isn’t it, to have ONLY one thing?) they will not let go.
Plus they now throw Mr Amaral into their melee. Saying we are calling him incompetent because he certainly would have this and would have that…
They seem to forget that we have showed that Mr Amaral has pointed to a different location for the BRT than that of where the big round table that appears in Frog’s picture is. Again, we ask, do these people think that Mr Amaral just draws arrows for the sake of it?
We recommend that readers look at the Frog’s picture again. Look at the layout. Does it look like the kind of layout that one shuffles tables around?
Does it look like that big large table was on May 3 in one location, then on May 4 in another and on that same day, it was put back where it was on May 3 and then taken away so that it wouldn’t appear in the photographs that appear in Mr Amaral’s book?
And why move the table from where it was on May 3 (where Mr Amaral has put the arrow) to where it appears on Frog’s picture on May 4? It’s daylight on the May 4 picture, so between when Maddie disappeared and the day of the next day was there reason to move it?
By the way, this whole thing is debunked by many, many things but could be debunked by just one word. Does the reader know what that word is?
A hint:
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2016/06/reconstruction-for-may-3rd-3007.html
There, would be established the differences between what people said they did and what they could show they did. Was Mr Amaral able to accomplish this? No. So stop saying he checked if all added up. He didn't because they didn't let him.
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1060937777842454528
ReplyDelete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @xxSiLverdoexx @AndyFish19 and 4 others
Is Tone dissing the whole of the Smith family again to frame Murat....? Murat was questioned by OG... #McCann http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm … From Aoife Smith's statement...
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Drk1RzUXgAA-hGi.jpg
8:50 am - 9 Nov 2018
*****
It appears that Mr Bennett is indeed dissing the whole Smith family. But you know who else disses the whole Smith family? You lord and master NT and your BFF the Frog.
I think somebody during this whole BRT saga mentioned about why the PJ didn't notice there was no BRT in the tapas. I think its quite clear from the questioning of Kate and by the questions put to Jane Tanner in her rogatory interview that they did not believe there was a BRT. Why would someone writing up a list of questions regarding a missing child bother to get as much details as possible about a table. The questions were designed to get Jane and Kates reacton
ReplyDeleteK
K,
DeleteNice to hear again from you. We have not forgotten to address the little uphill thing but as you can see we have been quite busy. We still have “arguido” questions pending as well as having to finish to answering Anne Guedes and her swinging questions after she agreed with us that there would not be expected to be found any evidence of swinging. All in due time.
About the BRT, it’s quite disgraceful what the BRT apologists are doing to Mr Amaral. They are conveying the idea that it’s either the BRT or Mr Amaral. To be specific, either the BRT existed and he’s a good man and a good professional or it didn’t and that means he was incompetent.
Basically, telling all that whoever says that there wasn’t a BRT is calling Mr Amaral incompetent. An obvious and deceitful connection much like saying that of there was no BRT then that automatically means that there was swinging.
As we have said in the current post, we will address this in detail in the future but for now, we would like to show what these BRT apologists are doing to Mr Amaral’s reputation – not that they care about that as they haven’t cared for the man and his family, why care for his reputation?).
In a normal case of a person allegedly going missing from a certain room and in that room as in other areas of that house, there were personal belongings of the missing person, it would be of the utmost incompetence for the police not to use those objects to determine the missing person’s DNA to so that later it could be determined if samples collected in the crime scene belonged or not to that person.
Said it like that, of course it would. Only an idiot would state the contrary.
But this apparent incompetence would only be incompetence a normal case but not in Maddie’s one, as we know, the PJ had to wait for a pillow case from the UK to be able to collect the girl’s DNA and was not “allowed” to use any of Maddie’s belongings in 5A.
Did this reveal any incompetence on the part of the PJ? No, it revealed a clear intent to obstruct the investigation, to allow it only to look at what was “allowed” to. Someone was making certain that the investigation was toeing the line.
So, to say today that Mr Amaral was absolutely incompetent because he didn’t use one of Maddie’s belongings to obtain her DNA would be extremely unfair to the man.
Likewise saying that he had all checked and verified about where the group dined at what table and who sat where, something that we now know was a hoax, is to be unfair to the man.
And to knowingly stain his reputation as in the back of the mind they have ingrained the idea on people that the existence of the BRT is directly linked to his competence and it has nothing to with it.
It only has to do with the circumstances under which he and the investigation so themselves in. Completely unaware of who they were really up against. Inhumane to ask them to have done better than they did and extremely unfair to question what they weren't able to do.
Hi Textusa ,been thinking about those tablecloths that were photographed on May 4th.I suppose tables dressed appears to show that they are in use .Maybe because it was May and a quiet time of the season the tapas wasn't serving food.Now if someone wanted to give the impression food is being served ,I'd say tablecloths would do the trick .
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 10 Nov 2018, 09:52:00,
DeleteThe relevance of the tablecloths (note the plural) in that picture is that they are clean. Not used.
We agree with you that in May it wouldn’t be profitable to serve dinners at Tapas but as we have seen, there was an unusual number of guests staying there then, so it’s understandable they would have had the Tapas open that week.
However Arlindo Peleja’s statement tells us it wasn’t a great success. He walks in and only the Tapas group is there, meaning that if Maddie had not died accidentally a few hours earlier, then the place would have been empty that night.
Empty but open as Peleja goes there for some reason.
The relevant issues to that picture is to understand the purpose of why it was taken. We will explain in a post but for now we consider relevant the following factors: that table skirts, the swung over tablecloth, Mr Len Port’s presence in the photo and the Frog asking Mr Len Port confirmation of the date of when it was taken.
All sorts being served there, according to Balu, the cook who appeared on a later video saying she cooked her signature fish dish, the cook that wasn’t with his kebabs, the T9’s description of the food.... anything but tapas is described.
Deletehttps://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1061045303133069313
ReplyDeleteGreen Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @CarlaSpade
You've seen the photo of the table named after me on Tex.
Taken on 4/5/07.
None of your business.
Photo proves BRT existed (and a 6 seater one too).
Police had all Tapas holiday photos.
Now, where is your evidence?
#mccann
3:58 pm - 9 Nov 2018
*****
Frog,
Oooops, a 6 seater? A typo there? Trying to sell a mini-van for a bus, are you? Anyway, we counted 7 chairs and around it and said it there was space for 1 or 2 more, making it a possible 9 seater. Stretching it to a 10 seater (to accommodate Quiz Mistress) would be to take things too far.
Now let’s get things straight. What you have done is produce A picture of the Tapas esplanade. A picture that first saw the light of day in November 2013 even though the case has been highly scrutinized since day 1.
You haven’t proven the picture was taken on May 4. We have acknowledged it was but we haven’t yet explained why we think this is so, so if you are going to take our word for this, please take it for everything else.
Your evidence that it was on the 4th, is that Mr Len Port’s polo shirt appears to be the same. Note the word appears. We will concede to that, that it is the same polo shirt. That proves only the Mr Len Port was using the same polo shirt on the esplanade picture that he wore on May 4. That’s it.
We are certain that, as Mr Len Port is a frequent visitor to Luz, in the many times he went to Luz as a journalist, he wore that same polo which means there may be other photos of him with that polo that were not taken on the 4th.
So until we explain why we think it was taken on that day, stop saying you have dated the photo. You haven’t. By the way, has Mr Len Port replied?
Nor have you proven that the BRT existed. You have shown a picture of the esplanade where indeed, apparently, appears a big round table. Is it the BRT?
Let us give you a hint: NT, in his somewhat angry post to try and prove that there was indeed a BRT used Brunt’s BRT, not yours.
Why? Brunt’s BRT one only gets, allegedly, a partial view of the infamous object while in yours, it appears in, allegedly, its full glory. And yet the Watcher prefers his over yours. Why?
Didn’t your mum tell you not to play with matchsticks? Because that’s the only thing we haven’t been able to figure out yet, as to why you insist in playing with the fire.
You appear to be totally unaware of the importance of the photo, so in your best interests we suggest you talk to Watcher about it.
Hint again, as we said, it only saw the light of day in November 2013 and even then, in a low-quality version and after that everyone from your side of the fence tried to smother its visibility no matter how much we tried on the contrary. For some reason, when you first tweeted it, we said “Finally!”.
“Police had all Tapas holiday photos”, could you tell us the number of the over-saturated black and white photos in the files are those Dianne Webster took of the Tapas dinners? Because if they aren’t there, either you are lying or Dianne Webster is.
Oh, loved to see you use the NT/Walker "None of your business" bit. Copyright infringement there?
DeleteDO NOT PUBLISH Anonymous at 10 Nov 2018, 11:41:00,
ReplyDeleteThat's what we hope to show in our next post. :)
DO NOT PUBLISH Anonymous 10 Nov 2018, 12:10:00
DeletePlease allow us publishing your comment in our next post! Please!
To know permission is from you, please mention the fruit you have mentioned in your comment.
Thank you!
Comment received that we have censored:
Delete“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The BRT that never existed":
Strawberry (censored)
Textusa - Pls let me know when you need to know by. I need to think about this. I take it you have reached a similar conclusion although I don't know who you are or who you are working for :)
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 10 Nov 2018, 13:42:00”
*****
Anonymous 10 Nov 2018, 13:42:00,
We have censored your comment because you were giving away too much for now 😉. Quite obvious, isn’t it?
Yes, it seems we have reached the same conclusion as we have. We have given as many clues as we possibly could give, now it will be up to us to put our money where our mouth is.
We work for no one on the case. We are only doing an exercise of citizenship. It’s been a tougher road than anticipated but a very rewarding one.
Textusa - yes we have had the same thoughts about the references (which are censored for now). It may appear to be obvious but who knows what their real purpose was - were they to lead, mislead, distract or blackmail? By whom and directed to whom? I look forward to reading your next post to see how you interpret them.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 10 Nov 2018, 16:10:00,
DeleteWe will see if we have the same thoughts, then. For now it's the weekend so will put together all thoughts team has thrown around on this subject starting Monday, so maybe in the middle of next week we will publish something, no promises.
About "were they to lead, mislead, distract or blackmail? By whom and directed to whom?" we would say as the Occam's razor principle states, that the simplest solution tends to be the correct one.
Once one understands why that tablecloth was swung over on purpose, then all is indeed simple.
If the photograph was for publicity purposes - to advertise the Tapas for special occasions, then maybe the tablecloth would be turned back to show the type of table tops that would be used. Just a thought. Kind regards.
DeleteWistle,
DeleteAnd what a valid thought indeed! So much so that we will use your comment in our post as well.
A post which is practically being written by our readers. In fact, we think with your comment all the dots are on the table, so to speak. All needed now is just to join them.
Your comment just needs only a correction, and that’s where Mr Len Port’s presence in the background is very important: if for publicity purposes, to advertise for special occasions then would he be in the background? We don’t think so.
Plus, publicity purpose pictures do not show types of table tops. They are destined to customers and customers just want to see the end result not how it was obtained. The picture would be of the tables, no Tapas employees or Mr Len Port in the background, no turned tablecloth, all nice and neat. As nice and neat as all other tablecloths.
For those not paying attention, we repeat what we said at 6 Nov 2018, 11:33:00:
ReplyDelete“Our ship is set on course for the BRT and that’s where we will be heading. We will not be distracted by this [a Sun’s article]. By this or by the recent stepping up of attacks against us.”
So you can paint your face bright fuchsia, put on a tutu and dance the can-can while holding a sign saying “Textusa, PLEASE throw rotten tomatoes at me” that we won’t be distracted.
But do continue, it’s just more rope you’re collecting.
Please do not publish identified reader at 10 Nov 2018, 21:58:00 and 10 Nov 2018, 22:09:00,
ReplyDeletePlease understand that we cannot reply to questions put in do not publish comments as that would be totally unfair to our readers as they wouldn’t know what the questions were in the first place.
Your questions are valid and helpful. You have come to the wrong conclusions in our opinion but that’s the part of the discovery process, what makes it fascinating. Please don’t be afraid to make them publicly and we’ll gladly answer them. Being wrong helps eliminate the possibilities proposed and that helps all to find what is correct.
We suggest that you either submit new comments or if you prefer, you can submit another do not publish comment telling us to copy and paste your comments and submit them either under your identity or as an Anon, so we can reply.
Thank you.
Unpublished identified reader at 10 Nov 2018, 22:09:00,
DeleteThank you for understanding and looking forward to your future comments.
We will try to address all the questions that you have put in your comments, in the future post.
We are not publishing your comment so as to protect you identity.
https://twitter.com/DaveHallCoLtd/status/1061555717134565376
ReplyDeleteDaveHall @DaveHallCoLtd
Replying to @jules1602x
Btw, for Christmas, I am sending you the book "How To Tell Sushi From a Kebab" in 4563467467985674852935 volumes by TeXtUsa.....
1:46 am - 11 Nov 2018
******
No need. Didn't think we needed to explain that when we put up the picture in the post as we thought it would be so obvious but here goes: one has a little stick and the other doesn’t. You will find out which is which when you write your picture-book.
Do send a copy to Jules afterwards.
https://twitter.com/DaveHallCoLtd/status/1061556164788396032
DeleteDaveHall @DaveHallCoLtd
Replying to @jules1602x
"Now, after that I face-plant into a small round table covered in bright fuchsia paint before I do a negligence pirouette Can Can..."
1:48 am - 11 Nov 2018
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1061589906403835904
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @DaveHallCoLtd
Ok that thought is stuck in my head now... (2 x laughing emoticons)
4:02 am - 11 Nov 2018
*****
Oh, Orlov (now Hall), you seem to think that we included you when we mentioned the distracting attacks against us. If that is the case, our apologies.
You have no importance whatsoever. Please understand that and understand that we’re not doing this to belittle you. That, you do a nice job by your infantile self.
For the case, and that is what matters, it has to be noted the importance you have, which is, we repeat, none.
You were just a tool that we used to out Mr Thompson. Then, we were quite clear and stressed that fact, that you had absolutely no importance whatsoever.
That is important because if you had any importance whatsoever, the storm Mr Thompson created in a glass of water because of you would have a reason. As you really have no importance whatsoever, everyone could see that he used his friendship over you to try to get to us, his hysteria being transparently disproportionate.
So, as you can see, you having the no importance you have is really important to the case. We can’t stress that more.
You are a simple supplier of spittle for the lick-spittles. Nothing more.
Now that Mr Thompson is going to spend his Christmases (to keep on topic) with his new BFF, NT, and no longer with you (basing this solely on the passionate friendship Mr Thompson showed to have for you) you might now consider spending them with your new BFF, Jules. A person you publicly so much respect, endorse and love and seem so willing to overlook all her untruths and her close friendship with a clear abduction apologist, Frog.
You do make a lovely couple and after all, why care about a dead little girl when one can try to be funny and win the ladies over?
The only surprising thing about you is your indignation when someone calls you a pro. Where’s the surprise?
From "FB Anon":
ReplyDelete"It's interesting to see on this on Twitter from Scotlass and the reply from Jilly CL.
Scotlass: I find it hard to believe that 8 parents and 1 grandmother were all in agreement to leave the children alone night after night while they wined and dined, with children that was unwell to boot, Pact of negligence , introduces abductor storyline. #mccann
1 reply . 1 retweet 8 likes
Reply 1 Retweet 1 Like 8 Direct message
JillyCL
@JillyCL
Follow Follow @JillyCL
More
Replying to @RScottnanna @Meadowuk @Andreamariapre2
Six of those parents being doctors, one of which was an A & E doctor who would have seen plenty of harrowing accidents that could happen to children. I've never believed 8 under 4s were left alone in 4 dark, strange apartments. #McCann #ALIBI
3:22 pm - 10 Nov 2018
1 Retweet 10 Likes Phil (Bang On!) TannAnn-KristineDebbie Lee PerryAndrea maria prestonMadeleine CaseTweets The Ponce of DubaiScotlassSholena WoolleyxxMicheLLeSxxDohBot
1 reply . 1 retweet 10 likes.
What I don't understand is how someone could like the tweets and presumably agree that neglect is the alibi and that the children weren't left in the apartments alone, but having agreed with the tweet, they still believe that the Tapas dinners took place."
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1061767851953000450
ReplyDelete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Carla...
Va te foder palhaco...
#McCann
3:49 pm - 11 Nov 2018
*****
Apologies to our readers for bringing over, again, rude language from the dark side but this tweet shows exactly how much Portuguese Jules knows.
The phrase above not even a 1st year old would write it.
Starting with gender, it’s clear that Jules thinks @CarlaSpade to be a woman:
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1061755463522574336
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @jules1602x @DaveHallCoLtd
I will! :) The Spade has now arrived, asking questions which we pros refuse to answer.
3:00 pm - 11 Nov 2018
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1061756317365354496
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog @DaveHallCoLtd
It's an hour early.. Did she forget to turn her clock back..
3:03 pm - 11 Nov 2018
The translation for a woman clown is palhaça and not palhaço (or as Jules has written, palhaco).
Then there’s the “Va te” which doesn’t make sense. It’s either “Vai-te” or “Vá-se”. The difference is in the formality intended.
If one wishes to treat the other person by the more formal “você”, then “vá-se” should be used and if one wishes to be more familiar, intimate and treat the other by “tu”, then it’s “vai-te”.
“Vá-te” is a hybrid between “Vé-se” and “Vai-te”. “Vá te” is that hybrid without the hyphen, which is wrong. “Va te” means absolutely nothing.
Let’s recall this tweet from Jules:
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1060908586782679040
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Hi Tex... I don't use Google translate love, it's about as reliable as a chocolate poker... You've taken the whole thing out of context again... Who said I, actually it doesn't matter... #McCann
6:54 am - 9 Nov 2018
Well, we did some testing on Google translator and the closest we got was this:
“go fuck yourself clown”, for which it returns this: “vá se foder palhaço”. Palhaço as in male gender.
Do compare that with Jules’ “Va te foder palhaco...”
The correct wording would should have been “Vai-te foder palhaça…” if the “tu” used or “Vá-se foder palhaça…” if the “você”.
We will let readers judge for themselves how proficient in Portuguese Jules is and how truthful is her tale of having spoken to a Portuguese photographer.
Funny thing, Jules has deleted this tweet. Why?
Jules,
DeleteEtsás cá a faezr uma fiugraça de prava qeu se tivseses dios ddeos de tetsa, enifavas-te num buarco e só saaís de lá qunado as galihnas tievssem detnes. Mas praa isso era perciso teers vegronha nsesa craa que é ciosa que não tnes.
(to our English speaking readers, our apologies but anyone fluent in Portuguese is able to read the above)
How does a person not needing Google translate know how reliable it is? If someone told them, was it accepted without evidence?
DeleteIf someone raised the subject of my fluency in a foreign tongue which I knew, I wouldn't say 'I don't use Google translate', implying that I use some kind of translator, I'd simply say, 'I don't need it'
Crikey - she’s not Pedro Silva is she?
DeletePedro’s google translation was hilarious, much missed.
Hahaha yes has made a massive fool of herself by asking the wrong person to give her a rude phrase in Portuguese. Maybe next time she should ask someone who is more than semi-literate. You're right though.. she won't feel any shame.
ReplyDeletePlease don’t publish Anonymous at 12 Nov 2018, 10:35:00.
ReplyDeleteThe absence of the cedilha (for the English-speaking readers it’s the ‘ç’ in Gonçalo and palhaço) can be explained by a non-Portuguese keyboard. As well as the absence of the acento on the “Va” which should be “Vá”.
But the absence of the hyphen would be unusual if it was a source outside Google translator, as it’s instinctive. Without the hyphen ‘-te’ or ‘-se’ the ordering “vai” or “vá” wouldn’t make sense even though grammatically it is correct. To use another word other than the used, it would be the difference between “vá-se catar” and “vá catar”, totally different meanings.
Plus, the gender is an unacceptable mistake even for someone with “sloppy” Portuguese. That’s not primary school Portuguese but pre-school one. No, pre pre-school. No way someone with just the basics of the language would make that mistake.
The gender mistake, the obrigado v obrigada is more common as the gender is about one self and not the addressee. So people with rudimentary knowledge of the language may use the wrong word. A woman saying thank you to a man, it could happen the use of obrigado and likewise a man thanking a woman to say obrigada. But they wouldn’t be native speakers or people with regular fluency in the language.
I watched the debate live last night, so the moment I saw that, I captured it. It was strange as Jules had been chatting up with the insignificant one while trying her best to pull the Frog away from the BRT debate. Jules must have felt frustrated and just butted in angrily.
Once the tweet captured, I then tried to find out from where it came from.
Speculating, the best I could come up with was that Jules typed in the English expression on the translator, and instead of copying and pasting, for whatever reason, typed it. Forgot the hyphen and tried to play clever by changing the ‘s’ for a ‘t’ to show she was really proficient in the language and ending up doing another kebab for sushi.
The knowledge of knowing to change the 's’ for a ‘t’ may have come from the person you mention.
However, all is speculation and only Jules can clarify what happened. Fact is that what she wrote even though the intent is perceptible, it's really, really bad Portuguese.
“please do not publish again” Anonymous at 12 Nov 2018, 12:40:00 and “Do not publish again ..” Anonymous at 12 Nov 2018, 12:47:00
DeleteThank you for your inputs. We do agree on the sloppiness. And do agree that the Judas you speak of is very much involved.
But more interested in that Judas, we are interested in the Judas who has given the Frog that picture.
One of the many Judases populating this case.
Was Judas any different from all other disciples before the Last Supper? No.
If there was the technology then to write blogs and someone wrote on the afternoon of the Last Supper that Judas was a traitor, would s/he be believed? No, nothing would set Judas apart from the all other disciples.
But truth is like olive oil, as the Portuguese say.
Thank you. Frog is very sly and she likes to give the impression she is connected to the case. Maybe she is.
DeleteWhat is the point of this?
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 12 Nov 2018, 12:24:00
DeleteThank you for asking!
We recommend you read our comment at 12 Oct 2018, 11:59:00 in our post “It’s September 2018 – Comments continue II”
https://textusa.blogspot.com/2018/10/its-september-2018-comments-continue-ii.html?showComment=1539341993972#c5082883659231817647
It was quite a long comment that had to be broken up in various parts:
Part 2 - 12 Oct 2018, 12:00:00
Part 3 - 12 Oct 2018, 12:00:00
Part 4 - 12 Oct 2018, 12:01:00
Part 5 - 12 Oct 2018, 12:01:00
We recommend that you read parts 4 and 5 where we parodied the contacts Jules had to have made to have the photographer tell her THE big secret that will prove once and for all the BRT existed and that she hasn’t (and apparently won’t) disclose to this day.
Note, she clearly says she spoke to him as she felt “a right brucey” while doing it:
https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1049776133607235588
J B Littlemore @JBLittlemore
Replying to @jules1602x
Sounds classy ; ) No formica there then? So was the photographer willing to discus the photograph of the BRT with you? #Mccann
2:38 pm - 9 Oct 2018
*******
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1049777616977350657
Special Agent Jules... 🕵️♀️ @jules1602x
Replying to @JBLittlemore
He probably thought I was off my trolley..
Understandable...
I felt a right brucey asking...
But he was very helpful yes... :)
#McCann
2:44 pm - 9 Oct 2018
The point is that Jules claims to have spoken to 3 photographers (one Portuguese, one Spanish (Alberto Paredes) and the other unknown), one at least, being Portuguese, are being questioned.
Her language skills appear to be somewhat lacking. Interesting we having received this comment that we didn’t publish then:
“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The Frog's BRT":
Jules does speak Portuguese and German, she is in relations with an ex pat, now in Marbella, she did not give a statement to pj. It is commonly known. What does it matter
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 4 Nov 2018, 17:31:00”
This Anonymous appears to know a lot about what languages Jules is supposed to speak, even though we haven’t the faintest idea what the statement to the PJ mentioned is about.
Now, please go back to your blog. You have 2 books to review and you are really falling behind. Plus, it’s been ages since you have updated your FB page. All this is reflecting poorly on you.
Makes it look like that we are setting your agenda and not the other way around.
As a sidenote, we wonder how Mr Bruce Springsteen will feel like, and what legal actions he may take because of that, when he finds out that you people are linking his name to possible swinging. As we have said and maintain, swinging is not illegal but is socially damning, so we don’t think he will be pleased taking into account that the association is being made in the high-profile case of Maddie McCann.
DeleteBut that’s between you and him. You were the ones associating the man to the case, not us.
A few tweets where a “Bruce Swingstein” is mentioned, in a clear reference to Mr Bruce Springsteen:
Deletehttps://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1004049521091936256
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1004051198867996672
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1004051198867996672
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1020711767402573825
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1026145845899608064
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1034166174441975809
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1042572222907510784
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1044269855841669128
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1045257090334363650
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1046051635582173184
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1049729858505457664
https://twitter.com/TheBunnyReturns/status/1051514454125539328
Is your keyboard really as needy as you show it to be?
DeleteSo Jules is supposed to speak German & Portuguese, (badly) just like Frog? ...
ReplyDeleteAnd Jules has replied:
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1062003303456874498
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
Hi Tex.. 1.. Could you show where i said this please..?
Not saying i have or haven't, just wondering where you've seen me say it.. Tar love..
#McCann
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Drz-X__X0AAvBx3.jpg
7:24 am - 12 Nov 2018
[Picture attached says: “We will let readers judge for themselves how proficient in Portuguese Jules is and how truthful is her tale of having spoken to a Portuguese photographer.”]
*****
Interesting how when others ask, they are demanding but you seem to have no problem in asking others about things we are not saying you have or haven’t done.
Those with clear consciences have no problem in answering questions, they don’t dodge them nor say “it’s none of your business”.
This is where you have said it:
https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1049766510988791809
J B Littlemore @JBLittlemore
@jules1602x Good evening! Since I gather we are under observation by some shady character on here, I thought I'd ask if you had any joy in finding out when the BRT photo was actually taken? #mccann #operationbrt
2:00 pm - 9 Oct 2018
*******
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1049767928663564290
Special Agent Jules... 🕵️♀️ @jules1602x
Replying to @JBLittlemore
Good evening my friend...
Yes, if the real shady would please stand up... :)
I sure have JBLittlemore... And who took the pics... :)
Photographer and date... With tablecloths too... I'm so happy .. :)
#McCann
2:05 pm - 9 Oct 2018
*******
https://twitter.com/JBLittlemore/status/1049770604809912320
J B Littlemore @JBLittlemore
Replying to @jules1602x
Perhaps you could just whisper who you think the Real Shady might be ; ) ?? So you found the photographer? That is above and beyond the call of duty! It takes all sorts ... pleased to hear the tablecloths made you happy ; ) So, was the photo taken in the Tapas bar?? #Mccann
2:16 pm - 9 Oct 2018
*******
At this point in time, only the picture from the CMTV documentary taken from our blog and screengrabs from the Chilean TV show were known. As it’s clear now that you are mentioning the Frog’s BRT, then you have to know Portuguese and talk Portuguese fluently to find your way to the one of the photographers you say you have spoken to.
Jules has replied:
Delete"https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1062135357402214400
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌🌸🐌🌸🐌🌸 @jules1602x
Hi Tex.. So nothing from me that I had spoken to a Portuguese photographer then..Just your assumptions.. Thanks for clearing that up.. #McCann
3:51 PM - 12 Nov 2018"
*****
Saying that things aren't what they look like doesn't make them to be different to what they are and, in this case, they look like they are.
https://mobile.twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1043248356393410560?p=p So that clears it up. Jules definitely DOESN'T speak or understand Portuguese. So why does she try to make out that she does?
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1043241667292291074
DeleteGreen Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @jules1602x @TheSun
There are a few of them who attach themselves to this #. How's the Keyboard Kaiser tonight? Busy preparing more fodder for the faithful?
1:52 PM - 21 Sep 2018
******
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1043242542760906752
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌🌸🐌🌸🐌🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog @TheSun
Are you referring to Sir Blacksmith Frog... :)
1:56 PM - 21 Sep 2018
******
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1043243654901653505
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @jules1602x @TheSun
Who else speaks in German? :)
2:00 PM - 21 Sep 2018
******
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1043244928153923584
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌🌸🐌🌸🐌🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog @TheSun
You... :)
2:05 PM - 21 Sep 2018
******
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1043246163045040129
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @jules1602x @TheSun
Alemão é minha terceira língua. (laughing emoticon)
But yes, HRH Antonio Sharplessio.
2:10 PM - 21 Sep 2018
******
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1043248356393410560
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌🌸🐌🌸🐌🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog @TheSun
Translate for a thicko...? (laughing emoticon)
2:19 PM - 21 Sep 2018
******
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1043249576092872704
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @jules1602x @TheSun
"German is my 3rd language" lol. But yes....AJS Sharplessio.
2:24 PM - 21 Sep 2018
******
Frog, it’s “Alemão é a minha terceira língua” and not “Alemão é minha terceira língua”.
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1062136496461938689
Delete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌🌸🐌🌸🐌🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog
For the second time too.. The anonymous commentor knows their stuff though and is bang on.. I know.. I'm really the real Arg Argent.. :)
4:14 PM - 12 Nov 2018
*****
To remind readers what Anon has said:
“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The Frog's BRT":
Jules does speak Portuguese and German, she is in relations with an ex pat, now in Marbella, she did not give a statement to pj. It is commonly known. What does it matter
Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 4 Nov 2018, 17:31:00”
Jules has replied to the above:
Deletehttps://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1062647218161836032
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 🐌 🌸 @jules1602x
FollowFollow @jules1602x
More
Hi Tex.. I wasn't referring to the anonymous commenter on 4th November 2018 17.31.00.. If that could be corrected please.. They are clearly lying.. Or a WUM.. As are you.. Interesting to say the least, as is your lifting of off # tweets..
#creepy
#McCann
2:03 am - 14 Nov 2018
*****
Jules, will gladly correct it. Unfortunately could not find comment at 4 Nov 2018, 17:31:00.
The nearest to that time we could find was 4 Nov 2018, 17:21:00. Is that it?
You keep referring to Textusa of lying/being a liar. When are you going to list these lies with the proof of how that it so? Please back up your statements otherwise it's just all noise.
Deletehttps://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1062135357402214400
ReplyDelete00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌🌸🐌🌸🐌🌸 @jules1602x
Hi Tex.. So nothing from me that I had spoken to a Portuguese photographer then..Just your assumptions.. Thanks for clearing that up.. #McCann
3:51 PM - 12 Nov 2018
*****
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1062131825835958272
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @jules1602x
More importantly - have your chickens got teeth yet? #mccann
3:55 PM - 12 Nov 2018
*****
https://twitter.com/jules1602x/status/1062132690797899779
00The Jules... 🕵️♀️ 🐌🌸🐌🌸🐌🌸 @jules1602x
Replying to @FragrantFrog
I know, what the hell is all that about.. ? My post on here last night proved an awful lot.. Tex is a blagger.. More interesting is you speak German.. ? :)
3:59 PM - 12 Nov 2018
*****
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1062135357402214400
Green Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @jules1602x
Tex has played anagrams with several Portuguese words. You have to decipher the word before you can properly translate. The German part is a historical joke between B/S, me & a few others. What's this about you & Marbs?
4:09 PM - 12 Nov 2018
*****
It is not an anagram. Yes, it’s misspelled text but anagrams are meant to fool, to make one work out what the correct order of the letters in a word are and this has the intention to generate an IMMEDIATE and EFFORTLESS reaction in finding the solution.
It shows that we don’t read words, as reading syllables or letters but we look at them as a whole, as pictures. The human brain reads without any problem a heavily misspelled word.
One just has to keep the first and last letter of the word in place and no matter how one writes the letters in between, one’s brain picks up IMMEDIATELY and EFFORTLESSLY what that word is.
An example:
The barin is a wodnefrul tnihg taht alolws us to be albe to udnertsand tihs.
An English-speaking person can easily understand the above. A person who is not familiar with the language can’t. And no Google translator helps. That’s the point.
Jules, once again, shows that she didn’t communicate in Portuguese speaker in her quest, having only a screengrab from CMTV, to speak with 3 photographers, one of which was Alberto Paredes.
But interesting is the fact that the Frog, with her “have your chickens got teeth yet?”, shows she was able to understand what we wrote. If not fully, at least that part.
This confirms that the Judas is indeed a link between the Frog and CMTV.
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1062148995282333698
DeleteGreen Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @strackers74 @CarlaSpade @McnaughtsStella
It's only one paragraph, aimed at Jules, as Tex doesn't believe Jules is proficient in Portuguese.
5:03 PM - 12 Nov 2018
*****
It's not a question of belief. Jules has clearly shown she isn't in any way.
So they have shared historical jokes about speaking German?
DeleteWhere did these jokes take place? Blacksmith isn’t on twitter is he, so must have been on the blog with name Antonio and Watcher/NT?
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1062126296254308354
ReplyDeleteGreen Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @CarlaSpade
Why is Tex so upset a Judas may have provided me with a photo proving the BRT really did exist on May 4th 2007?
3:33 PM - 12 Nov 2018
******
We’re not upset at all because it’s ridiculous to suggest the tables appeared for later that week and then disappeared.
We are sad, disappointed. We already knew but having the confirmation that the treachery reached so near Mr Amaral is something that always leaves anyone quite sad.
Much like when we don’t understand when we see people fill up their social media with political views of fighting the unfair concentration of power and influence the wealthy have but when they can make a difference, like in the Maddie case, they do the bidding of the wealthy.
Everyone has, indeed, a price.
https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/1062130535001219072
ReplyDeleteGreen Leaper @FragrantFrog
Replying to @CarlaSpade
Consider yourself a carrier pigeon. You know nothing. You weren't there.
3:50 PM - 12 Nov 2018
*****
Yes, we know you were there. Question is, did you know what was photographed on May 4?
We would be surprised if you were informed.
Frog now saying:
ReplyDelete1: has photos. Won’t say from where.
2: Webster photos, she may have seen (blows everything to Smithereens).
3: thinks that’s the end of it. ��
Seems like Townsend is back. What timing!
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/SkyNewsBreak/status/1062388386546233345
ReplyDeleteSky News BreakingVerified account @SkyNewsBreak
Sky Sources: the Home Office has agreed to provide a further £150,000 for the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann
8:55 AM - 13 Nov 2018
*****
1. Not criticising but noting, by continuing Grange without funding news in the last cycle, we thought the Gov wasn’t going to talk again about it and continue the operation until it deemed it should;
2. The Gov chose to make this news completely out of “usual” cycle;
3. By coincidence – we think NOT – this is also news just now: “Brexit: UK and EU 'agree text' of draft withdrawal agreement”
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-46188790
https://news.sky.com/story/live-ministers-summoned-to-downing-street-to-see-draft-of-brexit-agreement-11553451
Now on Sky News, now in the link above:
DeleteBoris Johnson calls for cabinet resignations over Brexit agreement
The latest as Brexiteers lining up to attack a draft agreement that the PM will try to sell to her top team.
which could be the bad news to bury on a good day?
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/The_Truth_II/status/1062713982866411520
ReplyDeleteThe Ponce of Dubai @The_Truth_II
Replying to @jules1602x @EricaCantona7
Table shmable. On & on it rumbles
6:28 am - 14 Nov 2018
******
Just a question. You have said this:
https://twitter.com/The_Truth_II/status/1062497755980091392
The Ponce of Dubai @The_Truth_II
Replying to @janamb @CarlaSpade
If they said the kids were babysat they couldn’t say #MadeleineMccann had been abducted #mccann #fakedabduction #hidCorpse #AskTheParents
4:09 pm - 13 Nov 2018
Could you please tell us why, if the kids were babysat, did this group limit themselves to Tapas for dinner? Why not explore Luz for that?
Oh, and it will rumble on and on…. and then some. And after that some, some more. Really, really boring. Booooooring. So don’t say you weren’t warned. If you’re not interested, don’t read it. Putting chihuahuas yapping how boring it is, just shows that it isn’t boring at all.
Apologies to readers, the collection of “thoughts” for the next post has turned to be, fortunately, much more complex and revealing than anticipated… we ask for your patience. Thank you.
They were on an inclusive package. Can’t see why they would pay for meals in one place then pay again somewhere else.
ReplyDeleteGood reply. Can’t argue with that. If it’s true.
DeleteOther than the T9 and Mark Warner/Ocean Club saying that, is there any other proof that they were indeed on an inclusive package that included dinner?
Note, we don’t expect for their to be others but are just saying that if both the T9 and Mark Warner/Ocean Club are stakeholders, as we think they are, then that information is not exactly reliable.
By the way, the "Table shmable. On & on it rumbles" is to prove that Mark Warner/Ocean Club are stakeholders in the case.
DeleteWho else would you expect to confirm it? That was the norm; I can't see what could be gained by lying about it
DeleteAnonymous 14 Nov 2018, 19:11:00,
DeleteJust realised that I have misspelled ‘there’ for ‘their’. A mobile, pudgy fingers, predictive text are a dangerous combination. My apologies to readers.
For that reason we accept you not having understood what we said above. It was meant to read “Note, we don’t expect for there to be other [sources of proof]”, so that answers your question.
Who says it was the norm? The T9 and Mark Warner/Ocean Club? Again as we believe they were stakeholders, we don’t deem that as reliable.
Considering that Tapas was empty when Arlindo Pelejas walked in and that the Mill is not exactly well located, it’s our opinion that there were very few guests there on combined packages.
If we believe that the Tapas dinners didn’t exist, it would not be consistent of us to take as reliable anything that Mark Warner/Ocean Club have said regarding this case.
The Mcs paid for breakfast at Mill, then said they didn’t eat there apart from once.
DeleteAlthough that’s contradicted by the woman who received them daily, Cecilia Firmino.
DO NOT PUBLISH Anonymous at 14 Nov 2018, 18:08:00
ReplyDeleteHaving reread your comment, which we would like to use, we see nothing libellous about it. Your references are in Kate’s book and so they are public. We have written them in our post “Freud and Maddie”
http://textusa.blogspot.com/2016/09/freud-and-maddie.html
We would like to use your comment because it’s candid and it shows that others see what we see. But if you prefer that we don’t, we won’t, no problem.
If that is the case, then you can’t accuse us of plagiarism as we will be using words from Kate’s book and not from your comment! 😊
We don’t control IPs. For various reasons and the first being that it would be a waste of time as those not wishing to be caught (they don’t believe we don’t control IPs) have many ways to hide theirs, rendering the exercise, as we said, useless.
DO NOT PUBLISH Anonymous at 14 Nov 2018, 23:20:00
DeleteAs is evident, we will fully respect your desire and understand your reasons.
Thank you for your support.
You don't control IPs because you can't.
ReplyDeleteGood. That clears up this issue.
DeleteThank you. We didn't know but do trust you know what you're talking about.
Formal dinners were served at the Millennium Restaurant, and not at the poolside Tapas snack bar. The Mill also had big round tables situated outside the venue.
ReplyDeleteI have been reading Blacksmith's latest posts and did a little checking.
ReplyDeleteIs John Blacksmith Antony Sharples the author or are they different people?
And either way around, why does he often hint he has important contacts' in the know'? Is this true or probably just artistic license?
Anonymous 15 Nov 2018, 08:52:00,
DeleteHe’s made no secret of the fact they are the same person.
We are certainly not the best to answer questions about him and if we were we wouldn't.
He seems to be present elsewhere on the internet where you can address all your questions to him.
http://portugalresident.com/maddie-investigation-receives-new-cash-injection
ReplyDeletegroup of businessmen offer reward....wwhat?
Bringing it over to the blog:
Deletehttp://portugalresident.com/maddie-investigation-receives-new-cash-injection
Posted by portugalpress on November 14, 2018
Maddie investigation receives new cash injection
The Home Office has announced further funding of €150,000 for the Metropolitan Police investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann from the Algarve almost 12 years ago.
Operation Grange has already spent over €13 million .
Pundits suggest “Something is clearly going on. Kids are being murdered on the streets of London, people are howling about the loss of 3,000 police officers, yet this can happen”.
Bizarrely, this funding has taken its time to be announced.
The last tranche of finance officially ran out over a month ago (click here).
At the time, long-term Portuguese critics of the British investigation reiterated their opinions that it has always been “politically directed” - an opinion shared by former Metropolitan police detective chief inspector Colin Sutton, and former British diplomat Craig Murray (click here).
This latest chunk of funding should take ‘Grange’ to the end of March 2019.
The Met’s inquiry has been drastically scaled down since its original workforce of 28 detectives plus seven others and a Detective Chief Inspector from Homicide & Serious Crime Command.
Sources within the Metropolitan Police have been calling for ‘Grange’ to be shutdown since 2015 (click here), on the basis that the money would be better spent on funding police work within the UK.
In the absence of breakthroughs over the years, an anonymous group of British businessmen is reported to be offering a €600,000 reward for any information leading to the resolution in this case.
The reward was posted 'some time last year', a source has told the Resident, describing it as "unique".
"Until now, despite fantastic large financial inducements, anyone with information has to have give personal details, which of course anyone who knows something, would probably not want to do", the source explained. Thus this reward can be accessed anonymously, depending on the value of the information offered.
http://www.anonymousreward.co.uk/claim-your-reward/
natasha.donn@algarveresident.com
interestingly the reward is on offer for Ben Needham,Corrie McKeague and Madeleine McCann...why would that be??
DeleteAnonymous 15 Nov 2018, 09:45:00,
DeleteInteresting to be finding out in the middle of November about something "unique" that was posted 'some time last year'.
Going on the link, the reward is not exactly for Maddie. It's for Ben Needham, Corrie McKeague and Maddie (they are listed in this order).
Are the €600,000 for each or is it just €200,000?
Then one calls, leaves the information on a tape and then 14 days later collects the money? Why 14 days? Shouldn't it be after charges be made?
One would expect a better Portuguese to have been used in the Maddie part, considering that someone is willing to give away €600,000.
All very strange to say the least. But at least now those saying that there would be whistleblowers because of a reward, they FINALLY have one!