At a certain point we asked our readers the following questions:
"Hands up all readers that call the 2009 McCann reconstruction a Mockumentary?
Why? Because you don't believe the witness statements it was based on?"
Although it was the common perception that those statements offered little or no credibility, we took the trouble to meticulously dismantle them so that the said perception would become a certainty.
These are the 18 posts we wrote about the Mockumentary and its Pimpleman:
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/03/for-english-eyes-only.html, absurd internal written instructions between just two people obviously to be seen by the general public, which set the mood and showed, together with many other things, the intention (and care) with which the Mockumentary was made and what credibility it offered.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/03/proof-that-kate-mccann-reads-textusa.html, the appearances of all three witnesses who claim to have seen Pimpleman are detailed and it was highlighted the fact that CFT’s sighting is in Kate’s book and not in the Mockumentary.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/03/edgars-cronic-discrepancy-syndrome.html, the Mockumentary debunks TS’s statement by placing her on the opposite side of the street from where she says she was.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/03/child-abused.html, TS’s credibility as a witness is questioned and the abuse done by the BHs in using a child to serve their purposes is strongly condemned.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/04/not-even-alice-in-wonderland.html, TS’s statement about her first sighting of Pimpleman is completely debunked.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/04/in-previous-post-not-even-alice-in.html, the “Now I see, now you don’t” tactic used both by TS & TS’s MOM and DEREK FLACK & CHRISTINE when it comes to seeing Pimpleman explains, in our opinion, why TS and her MOM are filmed coming from the opposite direction from the one they reside in.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/04/mockery-within-mockery.html, TS’s statement about her second sighting of Pimpleman is completely debunked.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/04/another-edgar-discrepancy.html, the inexplicable discrepancy between where DEREK FLACK says he lives in the UK and where is said he’s from in the Mockumentary.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/04/debunking-urban-myths-pimpleman.html, based on the PJ Files, contrary to myth, it’s shown that none of the three versions of Pimpleman have been found to date.
It’s absolutely false that TS’s Pimpleman has been ruled out to be MICHAEL ANTHONY GREEN. It’s also absolutely false that DEREK FLACK’s Pimpleman is BARRIGTON GODFREY NORTON. About the latter, it’s clearly shown in the files that FLACK himself denies that NORTON is the man he allegedly sees.
There wasn’t any need to use the PJ Files as the fact that all the three witnesses participate voluntarily in the Mockumentary in April/May 2009, long after the case had been archived, shows how the three agree that then their respective Pimpleman hadn’t been identified. He’s still out there.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/04/lapse-of-memory-or-lack-of-character.html, it’s showed the incomprehensible and ridiculous inconsistencies of DEREK FLACK’S statements about when did he exactly see Pimpleman and about what led FLACK to be in that street.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/05/faulty-memory-day.html, making use of the fact that this year the days fell on the same weekdays as in 2007, we showed how ridiculous FLACK’s “lack of memory” really is.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/05/flack-and-pimpleman.html, DEREK FLACK’s statement about his sighting of Pimpleman is debunked.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/05/flack-and-white-van.html, DEREK FLACK tries subtly to bring BARRINGTON NORTON into the case as a suspect by showing to have, after all, a very selective memory.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/05/flack-distances-and-angles.html, it’s showed how unfamiliar DEREK FLACK was with the surroundings of Apartment 5A as well as is proved that Pimpleman couldn’t be looking at that apartment when DEREK FLACK crossed with him.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/05/pimpleman-very-very-sick-man.html, a possible explanation for Pimpleman’s unexplainable inhuman behaviour is given: autism.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/06/pdls-sudden-heat-wave.html, it’s showed how impossibly erratic the weather had to be for Pimpleman to be seen wearing the clothes he was said to be in by the three Mockumentary witnesses.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/06/number-1-is-always-first.html, based on his address in PdL it’s showed how highly unlikely it was for DEREK FLACK to be where he is when he says he sees Pimpleman.
http://www.textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/06/what-is-most-outstanding-feature-of.html, it’s showed how improbable it was for Pimpleman to have been seen by only three people: one an Ocean Club tourist, another an Ex-Pat and the last one a Brit tourist with his own apartment in PdL.
I think we made it pretty clear that JW, TS and DEREK FLACK are LYING and we’re not talking about three people looking for their 15 minutes of fame.
Two of them voluntarily showed their face only two years after their initial statements and the other, JW, opted to have an actress represent her and thus maintain a low profile to this day.
All three witnesses are referred to anonymously both in the Mockumentary and in Kate’s book.
We know that the schoolgirl is TS and the couple to be DEREK and CHRISTINE because we’ve read the PJ Files, and we know JW is JW because of Edgar and his whiteboard.
No, these people are not seeking fame. If it wasn’t for blogs like ours they would’ve remained nameless to this day.
Two of these people, TS and DEREK FLACK, went to the PJ before a week had passed. from Maddie's disappearance. Much before sighting-fever began. Neither of the two would be people of interest to the PJ. Both lived, or resided, at a significant distance from Apartment 5A and the Tapas complex, so it was them who approached the PJ and not the other way around.
We know little of JW’s statement. Basically just what is shown in the Mockumentary. But there’s little doubt that her statement is interlinked with those from the other two witnesses.
Kate does feebly warn us that the different sightings may refer to different men. We know that there are two kinds of sightings: real ones and fictitious ones.
Smith, Carol Tranmer and Tanner belong to the category of the real. All of them saw people of interest to the case. Tranmer saw a blonde man and Smith and Tanner saw Gerry McCann, although the latter lies both about from where she sees him and about what path she saw him walk up to the farthest corner from Apartment 5A between Rua Dr. Francisco Gentil Martins and Rua Dr. Agostinho da Silva.
But our attention today is focused on the other three sightings. The fictitious ones.
If it’s absurd to think that TS, JW and DEREK FLACK saw a PimpleMAN, it’s a total irrational lunacy to even think that they saw three different PimpleMEN.
That would mean that we had to have abductors attacking in packs in PdL, all choosing the same child and all choosing the same spot from which to observe the apartment she was in.
Besides, we don’t even have to say that the statements from JW, TS and DEREK FLACK are interrelated because that’s the conclusion reached by all Mockumentary participants, in front and behind cameras, by using a single actor to play the part.
These three characters refer to one, and only one character and a fictitious one at that.
As we’ve shown, both TS’s and DEREK FLACK’s statements are so much filled with detail that it means they the subject of intricate planning. The intentionality is clear and the message was carefully delineated by its authors, pity the messengers failed.
Not only are they lying individually, as their statements are so clearly interlinked and intertwined, that it shows that they’re also lying “collectively”. That's what is most significant about the statements from these three witnesses.
There's absolutely no apparent connection relating the three witnesses, JW, TS and DEREK FLACK, between themselves. There's also no apparent connection relating TS and DEREK FLACK with the McCanns or with the remainder T7.
If JW is JENI WEINBERGER as we think she is, then there's a link, albeit weak, between her and the McCanns and that's the Tapas tennis. However we don't believe that the sport would create, in less than a week, such a bond that would be strong enough to make one make up stories about a stalker in which the disappearance of a child was at stake.
It’s quite clear that JW, TS and DEREK FLACK are LYING, in a scheme greater than themselves, in their statements concerning Pimpleman made to the PJ with the clear intent to obstruct justice.
Anyone think otherwise? Please do raise your hands.