Friday 2 March 2018

The paedo offensive


1. Introduction

We published our post “Very important concessions” on Friday Feb 16 2018 at 09:00.

In it we have shown how Walkercan1000, Insane’s character as the other side’s top Twitter minion, had been helpful in letting us understand what had happened in the Maddie case when Gemma O’Doherty announced she was going to publish an article about Maddie on Jan 7 and which she did so on Feb 3.


We showed that Walkercan’s tweet on Jan 23 containing the words “Madeleine” and “messing with” and having annexed a cropped version of the make-up photo– showing clearly that he searched for it, copied it, meddled with it and annexed it, so all intentional – was a distress call made by Insane when, from his minion point of view, he saw things getting way too uncomfortable.

That confirmed that when under pressure he is unable to control himself, very typical of his temper in other circumstances, but has also shown that he is a coward who cannot be trusted as when he caves in he turns on his own.

This, evidently, did not go down well with his higher echelon.


2. The dilemma

As we attacked Walkercan1000 and Not Textusa, we were intrigued as to how Insane would react to the post.

On one hand, Walkercan1000 supposedly does not read our blog so he could not say anything and on the other Not Textusa could not come out and defend someone who he says he isn’t.

So, we put Insane in a dilemma and we were curious about how he was going to go about solving it.

And he surprised us.

His reply came with a post not about us but about having created another of his blogs, this one dedicated to Cristobell, called “Cristobell Unhinged”.


The post announcing the blog was published 16 hours after we published our post, on Feb 17, 01:07 GMT (Feb 16, 17:07 Western Standard Time (WST)).

But the funny thing, and what baffled us, was that the link there took us to a blog made up of picture of a cat. Nothing else but that-.

A post announcing a nothing blog, or in other words, something about nothing, or so it appeared.

His Walkercan1000 persona had then stopped tweeting since Feb 14, 22:27, so as far as we could see Insane was not occupied.

The first conclusion we came to was to think that the dilemma had tied his hands and as he saw himself unable to react to the exposure, he published this post to try and say that he was “too-busy-to-respond-at-the-moment”, a tactic he has used previously, more specifically when he abandoned blogging against us during his break for over a year and a half.

But then he replied to our “Very important concessions” post with one on his blog published on Feb 17, 19:41 (Feb 17 11:41 WST). So, the post about the nothing blog couldn’t be about him pretending to be too busy.

Nonetheless, it took him over a day and 10 hours to respond. And 18,5 hours when he last blogged about that nothing blog.

We assumed that it had taken quite a long time for him to come up with some sort of solution for the conundrum we had put him in: while wearing the costume of Not Textusa defending why Walkercan1000 had been so stupid as to needlessly draw attention to the “make-up” photo in that moment of panic.

We will now apologise to our readers because we are about to do a very off-putting thing: we are going fully transcribe here his uncensored response.

We know it will be very unpleasant but we don’t want to be accused of ignoring, intentionally or not, some important point he may have made, so this is ALL he has written in his response post (we have only taken out what we wrote and he copied):

“Evening all. Having had a quick glance at this week's feeble offering from the gobshite, I can only hope we all get through what follows with our will to live still intact.

In case I lose you along the way, I want you to know you've meant a great deal to me, gentle readers.....

No it wasn't

Yeah, you did

We don't care

Never stopped you before

Why?

You weren't

Oh dear, didn't your Textaloons gather round and carry you shoulder-high from the building?

Oh get on with it you frigging mental.

Oh ffs - more conspiralunacy

She must be thrilled

Get. The. Fuck. On. With. It.

That sentence makes no sense whatsoever

Have you been drinking? Petrol?

Your friend David is a twat

See?

Having sustained multiple fractures and permanent brain damage

You are talking out of your gigantic arse

Consensual?

Alleged? So that's what you are going to go with, is it?

What the utter fuck is the point of this? Are you going to list every tweet she made? Why not go the whole hog and stalk the poor cow?

Why? What is the point of this?

Oh fuck this for a game of soldiers. The tweets are there on twitter if you want to read them, but bollocks to this navel-gazing by Textusa. I am going out for pizza and will be back when her meds kick in

And you're back. Seriously, what was the point of that?

At which school of journalism do they teach hacks to reveal the content of their exclusive articles a tweet at a time for a whole month before publication? Because it's weapons-grade fuckwittery

Well if it is so ridiculous that even you, a famous idiot, finds it ridiculous, for what possible reason would she include it?

So fucking what? It's factual that you are a weapons-grade fucktard but I don't mention it in every response, do I? Even though - and I must stress this - I am always thinking it.

Is it an article about Mary Boyle? Then shut the fuck up, chimpface

You remaining in ignorance is not a new development, trust me

Implied to whom - you and the twatdangle chorus who have affixed their lips to your arse cheeks?

Yes we can. You are completely insane.

So, ladies and gentlemen, the point of the last 25 ft of utter bullshit was that Gemma did not include every fact in her article.

Textusa is not familiar with the concept that less is more

I know you like to pretend that you're a journalist, Maria, but you're not. If the article was shorter than she originally planned there's a whole host of reasons why this might be, including deadlines and sheer physical space. Not everyone has the luxury of producing articles which are 22 feet long and covered in flecks of spittle

Probably for a lie down, if she's read that garbage

Matron, the tinfoil please!

Cobblers. You really think MI5 get involved every time Lapizlazuli writes another shit column?

God give me strength

She's really gone this time

Oh for fuck's sake

Don't flatter yourself, pet. I'm an equal opportunity piss taker

Okay

Firstly again, for the record, I am not connected in any way shape or form to this Walker twat. Secondly, I was taking your retarded article to bits, angel. That's what I do

What?

Find another word which means the same as ''grate'', you festering nitwit

There now follows a party political broadcast on behalf of the Stalker's alliance

Oh do fuck off, Maria. You are well aware he isn't me. In fact, most people know who I am; you're just too thick to catch on

Girl, you've got a problem.

Well, give the girl her dues, she's a top-notch stalker

Oh yes, I remember this bit - when you posed a question and no-one responded so you answered it yourself?

Ah - so the 'make up' photo is the ultimate distress signal, is it? Well, that's useful to know. So in future we won't dial 911, but rather sidle up to people sitting on a park bench, whisper "The Lion Sleeps Tonight" before pressing a shitty copy of the photo into their hand and basically fucking off?

You leave my hole out of this

Okay, folks, enough of this bollocks. The Maddie case has nowt to do with Brexit not least because the poor child had probably been dead for years before the Brexitshambles hove into view

Absolute bollocks. Seriously, where do you get this nonsense from?

Theresa May has NEVER been in a winning position - she campaigned to remain, you cloth-eared horse

That is top quality looning. Even for you.

It's the local paper, you fuckwit. What possible interest would the national press have in a sad little man sitting in his bedroom wanking like a theme park chimp to pictures of little girls?

Don't be utterly ridiculous.

I wish I had a green army and a blue army. I would pay both of them to shoot you.

Oh not this bollocks again

That fucking ship has sailed, dearie .

Demented. Just..... demented

At this point, dear readers, I am going to let you read ahead or skip to the end, as is your wont. Frankly, reading the whole thing in one go should be on some kind of prohibited list, because I am quite certain Textusa has previously melted away human brains like something off Dr Fucking Who

You are mad. Seek help.

There wasn't one, you plum

He [Walkercan1000] sounds as mad as you.”

And as captions for the pictures he had this to say:

“Despite having her internet privileges revoked, Textusa still couldn't stop scribbling on the walls

Textusa's challenge - to post a comment 27 times the length of the original article without making a single, substantive point. This was going to be a piece of piss

The medical team were in agreement - Textusa's OCD was getting worse

Every breath you take.....

Every move you make.....

Every bond you break, every claim you stake......

I'll be watching you

Textusa had to be honest - this game of Space Invaders was not going her way

Of one thing the doctors were decided - they were going to kick the living shit out of the person who reactivated Textusa's Clip Art privileges”.

This is what he had to say after putting 1 day and 10 hours of thought into it.

Almost all passionless insults, no heart in it, showing that it was more about accomplishing a chore than expressing any sort of response.

We would say that out of that waste of words, Insane only speaks of 3 relevant points.

Firstly, he repeats that he’s not Walkercan1000, something that seems to bother him a lot.

“Firstly again, for the record, I am not connected in any way shape or form to this Walker twat.

(…)

Oh do fuck off, Maria. You are well aware he isn't me. In fact, most people know who I am; you're just too thick to catch on

(…)

He [Walkercan1000] sounds as mad as you.”

Another coincidence is that Wakercan1000 also says people know who he is:


Michael Walker@walkercan1000
Replying to @CarlaSpade
I'm Wright, I'm Corner, I'm Gerry, I'm Gamble, I'm Marian, I'm Mitchell and now I'm Julie. I've told you all who I am Sunbeams. XXX #mccann
12:20 am · 5 Feb 2018

Secondly, he distances himself from Nigel Nessling and even gives (why?) a reason as to why the mainstream media did not echo the news from a local paper about an assumed McCann supporter being sentenced for a serious crime:

“It's the local paper, you fuckwit. What possible interest would the national press have in a sad little man sitting in his bedroom wanking like a theme park chimp to pictures of little girls?”

It would be interesting to know how Insane knows the pictures Nessling had were of little girls and not of little boys or not even of both.

Thirdly, and most important, he tries to minimise why Walkercan1000 had tweeted the make-up photo:

“Ah - so the 'make up' photo is the ultimate distress signal, is it? Well, that's useful to know. So in future we won't dial 911, but rather sidle up to people sitting on a park bench, whisper "The Lion Sleeps Tonight" before pressing a shitty copy of the photo into their hand and basically fucking off?”

Trying to shrug off the importance of both the photo and of that tweet.

As all the rest is puerile and gratuitous insult and the first 2 points are about the past, one can only conclude that this response is all about him doing the best of his abilities and possibilities and without being noticed doing, to minimise the “make-up” photo tweet, which was something that supposedly someone else had done and not him.

That’s the chore he had to do. Him saying, you Textusa have said that tweet was a distress call Walkercan1000 sent out but I must now say it isn’t and I must say it isn’t really that important, so people should overlook he published that.

And that’s how he solved the dilemma.

Using the Not Textusa character to diminish the enormous and serious blunder made by Walkercan1000.


3. The attack on Cristobell

But the question remained, why open up a blog in the middle of a crisis and do nothing with it?

There had to be a reason for doing this in his mind but he simply wasn’t showing it.


Only 4 days after creating the blog, on Feb 21, he does write something on it. And 4 posts on that day. Then 6 posts on the next one and 1 on Feb 23.

A total of 11 posts in 3 days and then no more. A blogging frenzy that lasted only 3 days, well, 2 only as the third day only was limited to a single post-

By coincidence, in this blog only the dates in which the posts are published are known, not the hours. Not a coincidence when one takes into account he knows we are monitoring his McCann case activities.

Reading the content of the posts, one gets the idea that he’s angry, that he’s resentful, that he hasn’t yet forgiven Cristobell for having been “made” to leave her blog.

Before we go any further we would like to make a point about the content of these posts, on Insane’s Cristobell blog.

We are fully aware that Cristobell does not like us, which she’s entitled to and we respect.

We debate ideas, we agree or disagree with them, but irrelevant of whether we like Cristobell or not, we have to say that we find abhorrent Insane’s dismissal of the personal experiences that she has described that she has gone through.

That is an utterly disgusting and totally reprehensible behaviour on his part but unfortunately is one we have gotten used to from him, both on his blog and his Twitter account.

People like Tigger and others who support him must carry that weight with them in their consciences.

But back to this strange blogging frenzy.

Him having pressure coming from all sides due to that stupidity of tweeting that tweet during “Gemma crisis” he very strangely just decides to go on what appears to be pointless rambling against Cristobell.

Could it be he was simply venting?

Limited to keep in Walkercan1000 character and to not be Walkercan1000 while being Not Textusa, was this a release valve for all his pent-up anger? If so, why only 3 days of it?

And it was during days that he had put in a very solid work of tweeting as Walkercan1000:

- On Feb 21 he started at 11:23, put in 12:29 hours of work and ended it at 23:52, after 47 tweets;

- On Feb 22 he started at 08:32, put in 16:00 hours of work and ended at Feb 23 at 00:32, after 25 tweets;

- On Feb 23 he started at 08:55, put in 11:44 hours of work and ended at 20:39, after 17 tweets

So, it wasn’t because he had nothing to do. Why this tweeting/blogging frenzy? There had to be a reason.

And there was as we’ll later see.


4. Insane and Martin Smith

To understand all we have to, once again, thank Insane for helping us along.

After the publication of Gemma O’Doherty’s article it started with his “relationship” with Martin Smith.

Gemma O’Doherty had tweeted about the Smith sighting before the publication of the article, to be more precise on Jan 31 and Feb 2.

But the truthfulness about the sighting that the article was to have, seems to have caught Insane by surprise.

His second tweet of the day for Feb 3 was this one (please add 8H00 for GMT to all the mentioned hours):


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
Replying to @Heavy_Dave
I spoke to Smith. He is 100% certain that the man he saw was not G #mccann .
2:17 am - 3 Feb 2018

At 10:17 that morning no one knew what exactly the article contained but Insane says this very interesting phrase “I spoke to Smith”.

Then, this 10 minutes later:


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
The #mccann Trolls won't be happy with @gemmaod1. Half the Bums were expecting a film (dim as) and the Smith sighting bebunks all their fruitloop theories. Happy days. XXX
2:27 am - 3 Feb 2018

This seems to be him goading someone who has for many years defended that Martin Smith had changed his mind, and in fact the article totally debunks that theory.

But only debunks that one, as the remainder of the Maddie internet world saw being confirmed all that is in the files and all that Mr Amaral had said in the TVI documentary about this sighting.

This shows that Insane was not himself.

In the space of 10 minutes he says Mr Smith told him he did not see Gerry, so what the article says is false, but then what the article says serves to debunk a theory. What is it? Is it true or is it false?

Insane seems to be confused. He isn’t. He’s blinded by anger.

So much so that he keeps on insisting that he has personal knowledge of what Martin Smith knows or doesn’t know and with whom the man speaks with or doesn’t:


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
LOL. Held back. @gemmaod1 has no more interviewed Lord Lucan than Smith. Smith speaks to no one anymore, following hounding and harassment from the #mccann Bum Trolls.
10:34 am - 3 Feb 2018


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
Bullshit. @gemmaod1 has not spoken to Smith. Behave. Liars. #mccann
3:20 pm - 4 Feb 2018


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
So @gemmaod1 is claiming credit for changing BBC's Panorama? She's such a liar. It was changed months ago AND Smith confirmed to me he would no longer discuss the case with anyone following abuse from #mccann Trolls.
11:24 am - 6 Feb 2018


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
"Her investigation". Too funny, she even starts her Tweets with a lie. She's not spoken to Smith, she's a liar. Nor the BBC. The iPlayer was edited a long time ago. Deceitful. XXX #mccann
4:34 am - 10 Feb 2018


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
100% Bullshit. @gemmod1 has no more spoken to Smith than Lord Lucan. Imbeciles. XXX #mccann
1:29 pm - 10 Feb 2018

7 days of “I spoke to Smith. He is 100% certain that the man he saw was not G”, “Smith speaks to no one anymore”, “@gemmaod1 has not spoken to Smith”, “AND Smith confirmed to me he would no longer discuss the case with anyone”, “She's not spoken to Smith, she's a liar” and “@gemmod1 has no more spoken to Smith than Lord Lucan”.

For 7 days Insane kept himself in denial and repeating that he not only had spoken to him as he had told him that he wouldn’t speak to anyone else.

Who was he trying to convince?

Well, we think he was telling the truth. And letting others know he was telling the truth.

We think Insane was part of the group of people who contacted Martin Smith back in 2008 after he declared publicly that he had recognised Gerry as Smithman when he saw him coming down the stairs of the plane.

A group of people who sat down with Martin Smith and his family and convinced him that it would be best if they did not speak to anyone anymore about the issue and that the press would start reporting that the family had changed their minds, that they were no longer certain that it wasn’t Gerry they had seen.

And then the Smith family “agreed” to do just that until they were released of these shackles on Feb 3, 2018.

If the reader researches this change of mind the Smith family is supposed to have had, the reader will not find a single quote from Martin Smith to that effect.

Nor will the reader find any journalist saying they had spoken to any member of the family and “s/he now says that s/he’s certain it wasn’t Gerry McCann”.

This change of mind was just one more lie the British media spread about the Maddie case.

But seeing the truth written in black and white in Gemma O’Doherty’s article meant a lot to Insane.

For example, it meant that his distress call/threat had really fallen down badly among his side of the fence.

It also meant that he had been kept completely out the loop in the negotiations that happened and no one bothered to tell him what was really going to appear in the article.

He was completely ridiculed before the eyes of all those who knew he had indeed spoken to Smith, which basically were all the people on his side of the fence.

The proof that he was furious is that he tweeted more angrily against Gemma O’Doherty AFTER the article was published than he did before it was.

Logic dictates that after an armistice the parties involved treat each other politely even if they continue to hate each other.

After the publication would it would have been expected and accepted as part of the game for him to have made polite ridiculing of Gemma O’Doherty. No real animosity, just keeping in character.

One must not forget that the side that had to concede to see truth being published was the UK, so it was the weaker side in the negotiations.

So, it is absolutely incomprehensible for someone from the weaker side, to go on an insulting rant against a player of the stronger side but that is what Insane went on doing.

He was so angry that he tweeted the following about Gemma O’Doherty and the Mary Boyle case (note the journalist had blocked Insane on Twitter long before the article was published):


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
Interesting that @jemmaod1 thinks that Uncle Boyle was porking his own sister yet feels free to block anyone on #mccann Tag that doesn't agree with her. Free speech on a one way street. XXX
1:34 pm - 3 Feb 2018


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
#Boyle latest. The Uncle did it. XXX
4:48 pm - 10 Feb 2018

As far as we know Gemma O’Doherty has never said what Insane accuses her of.

He was simply in a rage and using her to lash out.

As this was after the UK had negotiated with the Republic of Ireland and able to leave all that other damning stuff that would link the McCanns to Maddie’s death that had been tweeted by the journalist, we would say that those who were on the UK side of things, weren’t pleased with either Insane’s insistence on telling the truth about himself and Martin Smith nor with him libelling Gemma O’Doherty in this manner.


5. Insane and Malinka

Insane’s rebellion started to show with this tweet:


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
Replying to @Loverandomleigh @nowayjomo and 2 others
Interesting that @gemmaod1 had to imply some sort of sinister Irish connection between Boyle and #mccann to drum up inquisitiveness. Typical journo (albeit unemployed) tactic worthy of the gutter press. What a fail, first Malinka now this fraudster. Poor Trolls.
12:49 pm - 8 Feb 2018

The tweet seems to be an attack on Gemma O’Doherty once again but is not, it’s Insane starting to turn against his own.

Otherwise why mention Malinka in it and call Malinka a failure?

The Malinka campaign had gone badly and not only had exposed Sergey but had also shown clearly that the Murats were not innocent bystanders as some persistently insist they are, as well as showed that the Mirage bar, owned by David S Jones, had been a “collaborative” location for the hoax.

The Malinka campaign had shown with total clarity that Praia da Luz is collaborating with the hoax.

But the Malinka book campaign had died in December.

Nothing to do with this article or with the Smith sighting, so why bring it up?

Because Insane was starting to feel isolated and hearing a gurgling sound coming from below deck and he wasn’t liking it.


6. Insane and his breaks

In our last post an Anonymous published the following comment:

Anonymous19 Feb 2018, 12:46:00

Walkercan hasn't tweeted for ages. Gone thanks to you?”

To which we replied:

Textusa 19 Feb 2018, 15:02:00

Anonymous 19 Feb 2018, 12:46:00,

We have also noticed his absence but we don’t think we have anything to do with it.

After the publication of the article on Feb 3, Walkercan100 went “AWOL” at the following intervals:

- from 05/02/2018 00:53 to 06/02/2018 18:16 (01d 17h 23’)

- from 07/02/2018 05:22 to 08/02/2018 15:47 ((1d 10h 25’) – but if one takes into account that on Feb 7 he only tweeted for 14 minutes at strange hours (05:08 to 05:22), one should consider that this silent period started at 06/02/2018 21:15 and that would mean a break of 1d 18h 32’)

- from 12/02/2018 01:10 to 13/02/2018 10:29 (01d 09h 19’)

- from 13/02/2018 19:22 to 14/02/2018 19:28 (01d 00h 06’)

We published our post at 16/02/2018 09:00.

He then broke his silence of 2d 18h 24’ (which had started at 14/02/2018 22:27) at 17/02/2018 16:51, tweeted 7 times in 37’ minutes and hasn’t returned since 17/02/2018 17:35.

So, credit is due where credit is due and his “tweeting crisis” started long before we published this post, as we said in it, it was equally interesting to watch the afterwards of the post as it had been watching what had happened before it.

These silence periods are between him and his higher echelon, in our opinion nothing to do with us.”

He was to return tweeting 2 days and 3 hours later on Feb 19 at 20:30.

As we have seen, during this prolonged break he created the Cristobell blog on Feb 17, 01:07 and responded to our post on Feb 17, 19:41.


7. The paedo offensive begins

What we call Insane’s paedo offensive started long before in his head, as we will see, but its visible sign was on this tweet:


Words‏ @QuotesMcCann
"As you can imagine Madeleine's parents are distraught and not doing very well at all. It's still questionable as to whether it's abduction. We are hoping that Madeleine is found as soon as possible and safe and well." John Hill BBC News 04/05/2007 #McCann”

Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
Replying to @QuotesMcCann
Is that the John Hill who worked for Mark Warner who with the local authority worked to conceal child sex crime in the vicinity to protect and preserve their tourist dollar. That one? #mccann
2:17 pm - 20 Feb 2018

Those following the #McCann know there are 3 subjects that Walkercan1000 keeps on repeating: that Grime wasn’t a cop and his dogs were useless, that Mr Amaral had beaten up or had Leonor Cipriano beaten up and that Luz is a “Pedville”.

But the Pedville accusations have only, until this tweet, been circumscribed to the Portuguese.

He has repeatedly posted a Daily Mail article about the Casa Pia case and has repeatedly implied that the Portuguese authorities have hidden the multiple attacks against little British girls that were invented by Operation Grange and their Burgundy man.

Basically, his message was consistently that Praia da Luz was a paedo haven but of Portuguese paedos and that the Portuguese authorities had put a lid on it so that the ignorant Brit tourists with their little Brit girls kept coming to the region pouring in their euros and their daughters and so leave the Portuguese business people and the Portuguese paedos wholly satisfied.


All heinous but all Portuguese doing. He has even said on Twitter that the leader of this alleged child sex ring was Mr Amaral.

But with this tweet, he turns on John Hill.

The man who we only know worked in Praia da Luz together with his wife. We don’t know if for the Ocean Club or Mark Warner as neither appear in either respective employee lists.

At least her name initially gets named as responsible for the Mark Warner childcare but then her name disappears into thin air.

We remind readers the Hills were called in by Operation Grange to be heard via the PJ in December 2014.

And with this tweet Insane links John Hill to this alleged paedo-cover up.

He couldn’t be clearer than he is when he says that Hill is someone “who worked for Mark Warner who with the local authority worked to conceal child sex crime in the vicinity to protect and preserve their tourist dollar”.

Insane had turned on his own.

On that same day, he launches the second attack of this paedo offensive by tweeting this, 02:23 after he had tweeted about Hill:


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
Dirty swines ex-pats avoiding HMRC and hiding child sex attacks to preserve their holiday lets. When the #mccann NoWin NoFee lawyers turn up McAlpine style (en masse) they and the libellers will be taken to the cleaners. All Trolls are easily found when they break the law. XXX
4:40 pm - 20 Feb 2018

No longer it’s a Portuguese thing.

Instead it’s a British one.

Link this tweet with the Hill one and the accusation is clear: Praia da Luz is a Pedville because of the Brits, who want it that way and have worked to keep at it like that.

And if it’s of the British interest that Praia da Luz is a Pedville, would it then be a paedo haven for Portuguese paedos? Of course not.

The accusation is clear, Praia da Luz is a Pedville created by the Brits to cater for British paedos.

Paedos who travel all the way there from the UK. The powerful and important British paedos.

Insane was on a roll, taking huge chunks with his teeth from the hand that had fed him all these years.


8. Insane and Cristobell

Let’s now go back to Insane’s Cristobell’s blog. The one he created on Feb 17.

Let’s revise the timelines so readers don’t get lost (all GMT times):

- On Feb 17, 01:07 he creates his Cristobell blog and puts only a cat picture on it;

- On Feb 17, 19:41 he responds to our post in a very lame and dispassionate way to try to minimise the make-up picture threat that he had made with his distress tweet of Jan 15;

- On Feb 20, 22:17 he tweets accusing John Hill is in on a paedo scam in Luz;

- On Feb 21, 00:40 he tweets accusing the Brit immigrants of Luz to be behind that paedo scam;

- On Feb 21, he publishes 4 posts on his Cristobell blog;

- On Feb 22, he publishes 6 posts;

- On Feb 23, he publishes 1 post.

Now let’s look at some excerpts of his words in that blog (our caps):

“Really, Ros? We are not the ones repeatedly blogging on the topic AND SENDING OUR REGARDS TO JAILED PAEDOPHILES

(…)

What a fucking nerve. How many times is this now that you have blogged on the topic?

Even the words you have just used there - "It blinds them to the real horrors" - illustrates perfectly how twisted your attitude is. YOU APPEAR NOT TO REGARD CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE AS ABUSE AT ALL, and certainly not in the same league as physical abuse, which is what you claim to have suffered from. You constantly downplay the impact of CSA on the victims and can only see the issues with reference to your own circumstances.

(…)

Again, YOU ARE THE ONE SENDING YOUR REGARDS TO CONVICTED PAEDOPHILES and describing your lack of understanding or concern for the victims in your numerous blogs on the topic, so don't even try that trick, lady.

(…)

What is your evidence that it is inflated, hugely or otherwise?

I provided a statistic the other day showing that more than 100,000 men in the UK had convictions for CSA [Child Sex Abuse] at a given point in recent years

You surely acknowledge that those with actual convictions represents the tip of the iceberg?

So what is your issue with an estimate of 700,000?

Where does it suggest that ''no man can be trusted''? There are 35 million men in the UK, give or take a million.

How does it ''put a distance between men and children''?

Police, doctors, teachers, writers - all professions where convicted paedophiles were employed at the time of their arrest.

Your claim that they are ''pretending to be normal people'' is just so, so ignorant. THAT'S WHAT THEY ARE - PAEDOPHILES EXIST IN EVERY WALK OF LIFE, EVERY PROFESSION, EVERY STRATA OF SOCIETY.

IF YOU DON'T KNOW THIS BASIC FACT, THEN WHAT ARE YOU DOING BLOGGING ON THE TOPIC?

(…)

“Official statistics, published annually, show the amount of child sexual abuse recorded by authorities in the year. The problem is much bigger than shown in official statistics, as most crimes are not disclosed and/or reported.

Most sexual abuse isn’t reported, detected or prosecuted. Most children don’t tell anyone that they’re being sexually abused. It’s a crime that is usually only witnessed by the abuser and the victim.

1 in 20 children in the UK have been sexually abused

Over 90% of sexually abused children were abused by someone they knew

Source: Radford, L. et al. (2011) Child abuse and neglect in the UK today. London: NSPCC.

Over 54,000 sexual offences against children were recorded by the police in the UK in 2015/16

Source: Bentley, H. et al (2017) How safe are our children? The most comprehensive overview of child protection in the UK 2017.

In 2012, there were nearly 30k registered child sex offenders on the register at that time. This takes no account of those unconvicted or who had come off the register

Source: Hansard

All published data, all in the public arena. There really is no excuse for your "I'm not buying it" response”

[Our note: interesting how when sources interest Insane he doesn’t hesitate in publishing them, and when they don’t, he either tells people to find them or calls them ignorant for not knowing.

Also, interesting that he speaks of Luz as Pedville yet goes on to give statistics about abuse in U.K. which is documented rather than speculative, and shows the Portuguese town is even speculatively probably paradise by comparison]

(…)

I didn't mention 'child sex' Ros. You did. If it's all the same, I prefer the term 'child sexual abuse'.

So what are some of the other situations where you were referring to predators, Ros?

Cannibals, perhaps?

Do tell.....

(…)

So there are no paedophiles because Ros says so. She doesn't know any so it must be true. But they are all at home anyway.

Can't you see how utterly at odds with each other your assertions are?

(…)

Here we go again.

Being in possession of those images IS a crime, no matter how much you complain that it shouldn't be. Searching for the people consuming those images is the route to making those children safe; why can't you understand that? The children are not being 'let down' by those trying to free them from this, they are let down by all those involved in the abuse and that included the consumers of it.

Once again you make reference to a child being 'battered'

This brings us to the heart of the matter, doesn't it?

You think the abuse you endured was worse than theirs and you don't see why they should be compensated when you weren't. That's it in a nutshell.

(…)

So there are predators everywhere, but you don't believe the estimates?

Your ignorance surrounding this subject is truly epic

(…)

Or - and here's a radical thought for you - how about we stop blaming children for the abuse they have endured?

How about you stop standing up for paedophiles and sending them messages of support?

(…)

Fascinating. Except you are the one who brought up 'child sex' actually; I am assuming you were in fact referring to child sexual abuse.

So basically you are now applying the term ''predator'' to anyone who isn't very nice. The term actually means those who exploit others, so now that we've got that sorted out, and given that you have been provided with data on the prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse from several published, robust sources, CAN YOU NOW PLEASE TELL US WHAT THE REAL FIGURE FOR ''ACTIVE PAEDOPHILES' IS IN THE UK, seeing as you are not buying the expert's data?”

Basically, accusing Cristobell of using her blog to protect and defend British paedophiles and as her blog is mostly about the Maddie case, to protect and defend British paedophiles possibly involved in the Maddie case.

If one links this accusation to the ones made in the tweets we have just mentioned , Insane is very clearly on the offensive against the powerful paedophiles involved in the Maddie case.


9. Insane and Anon

As the reader can see, it’s a quite complex set of dots to join but as we said all was due to Insane’s help.

And that decisive help came when an “Anon” decided to comment in our blog, in our post from last week.

He submitted 3 comments, 2 of them were replies to a reply from an Anonymous in last week’s post.

To contextualise

The first comment we received to our last post was from Anonymous 16 Feb 2018, 12:54:00.

This anonymous in this comment said this: “Also, I am still interested to know if you intend to do a post about the makeup photo - it fascinates me. Thanks again Textusa for your involved post which explains the intricacies of the 'game'.”

We replied by saying that we didn’t wish to do a post on the make-up picture and that we had only seen it used by the other side when it first appeared in 2010, then because they wanted to give the then government a warning to leave the Maddie issue alone.

In this reply we asked this anonymous if “would a heavily pro-McCann (to understate) media allow the surfacing of a picture of Maddie reeking of paedophilia if the secret to hide was that?” and answered it ourselves by saying “of course not, only if they were idiots. And they are not idiots and it was in the mainstream media the picture first appeared”

The anonymous in turn replied and stated quite clearly what was his/her opinion about paedophilia in the case: “paedophilia has always been used as a massive distraction at pertinent times. It immediately gets people talking about paedophilia (which I agree with you is simply not directly involved in M's disappearance). So when WalkerCan used it - it was a 'last resort' flashcard...”

And that’s when Anon makes his entrance by replying to the anonymous above with the following:

Anon 24 Feb 2018, 12:29:00

But it was about establishment paedophillia. It was targeted at government figures...a "we know about your predilections" warning shot. New government in place etc. Still think using paedophillia to hide swinging alone is too big a stretch though. The reverse would be far more likely.”

We replied to this with quite a long comment that the reader can read in its entirety in last week’s post.

There we only addressed the unlikelihood of Maddie having been a victim of paedophilia.

We put to Anon 28 questions – to which he has failed to answer to this day – based on a very simple and straightforward reasoning: if Maddie had indeed been a victim of paedophilia then she was raped and murdered by a nepiophile, and if the Maddie case is an establishment paedophile cover-up as Anon implied it was, then all those who are working and have worked in all the entities/agencies mentioned in the Operation Task debrief – the official document about UK’s participation in the case – knew they were aiding, know they have been aiding and know they are aiding that nepiophile/infantophile and have lived comfortably with that knowledge in their consciences for the last 11 years.

And besides the people above, the same reasoning was valid for all those besides them that we have seen being untruthful about the case in the same number of years: the media, the Ocean Club and the Mark Warner staff, guests and British immigrants.

As Anonymous 26 Feb 2018, 15:04:00 has said:

“And impossible to agree with the list of questions without blindly believing that child sex abuse was the reason for a cover-up. It’s absurd...”

Those who defend that the secret is paedophilia must agree that all the people above live in peace with their consciences. All and every single one of them.

But this post is not about that we think that paedophilia is clutter to distract as we have insisted for many years now but about Insane’s attack on paedophilia.

What Anon has said in this particular comment is that Maddie was a victim of the “establishment paedophilia” and the picture was put out to warn them that “we know about your predilections.

Or answering our question that we had put to anonymous, the heavily pro-hoax mainstream media had been immense idiots to the point of giving a warning shot to hide the paedophilia involved in what had happened to Maddie by using a picture of Maddie that reeked with paedophilia.

Basically, trying to hide paedophilia around Maddie by linking Maddie with paedophilia.

Does this make any sense under any scenario? No, it doesn’t.

But then Anon didn’t seem to us want to make any sense. He just wanted to send a very clear message.

To understand it, the reader just has to abstain from thinking that the comment is about the make-up photo and extract from that comment the following: “…was about establishment paedophillia. It was targeted at government figures...a "we know about your predilections" warning shot”.

Join this with the offensive Insane has driven against the powerful paedos since he started it with the Hill tweet.

And with this comment Anon makes things clearer by putting a name to those powerful paedos Insane was threatening: the “establishment paedophilia”.

To our new readers we would like to clarify that we are certain paedophilia is involved in the case but we DON’T think it had anything to do directly or indirectly with Maddie’s loss of life which we believe happened as a result of a tragic accident involving Kate McCann and David Payne around 18:30 on May 3.

The paedophilia we think is involved in the case is the one Anon mentions: the establishment paedophilia. In our opinion it is involved in the pulling of favours by those knowing their sick predilections and using that knowledge them to force them to participae and help in the hoax.

Please do not limit “establishment” to government.

Remember Insane’s words when ranting against Cristobell: “paedophiles exist in every walk of life, every profession, every strata of society”.

Inside and outside politics. In the media, in the justice system, in the police forces just to name a few relevant areas of society there are people susceptible to blackmail and so easily manipulated.

But even though a serious problem in the UK, it is a small number of people, especially compared with the one of powerful people who engage in socially reprehensible but LEGAL sexual behaviours.

One of these legal but socially reprehensible sexual behaviours is swinging.


From Natalie Rowe’s book, “Whipping up a storm”, when she refers to her friend Stephen:

“…he was into swinging and took me with him to Paris, to a secret, exclusive and expensive club (the annual membership was several thousand pounds) called Cleopatra. Everyone seemed completely respectable, well-heeled and with reputable careers.... [skipping here explicit details].

Stephen also took me to an even more exclusive get-together in a huge chateau about 45 minutes outside Paris. We drove through huge electronic gates into expensive grounds. This swingers club was for judges, lawyers and politicians- nobody could be a member without being recommended by another member and then going through a thorough vetting by the club. Members, who were sworn to secrecy, could bring a guest but they had to take responsibility for the way they behaved. Anything against the rules and you were immediately black balled.”

Natalie Rowe who we remind people has tweeted this:


Natalie Rowe@RealNatalieRowe
(link: https://twitter.com/skynews/status/963135789675802625) twitter.com/skynews/status… Well according to @theresa_may the Police need to make do ! There’s no money left, so tell Scotland Yard to get jogging and come to think of it, how about arresting the #McCann under caution and start asking them for a recap on their movements that NIGHT
Sky News@SkyNews
Police investigating the disappearance of Madeleine McCann have requested more money from the Home Office (link: https://trib.al/etlOTkY) trib.al/etlOTkY
7:59 pm · 12 Feb 2018

These “judges, lawyers and politicians” that Natalie mentions in her book, know the right people who know what there is to know about the establishment paedophiles, and so can blackmail them.

They then can use these establishment paedophiles to protect their own legal but seedy secrets in a society that is highly judgemental when it comes to sex, which the recently produced sex-pest list to discipline politicians by sex-shaming them, is proof.

Insane is not threatening the establishment swingers. They would swallow him whole between 2 appetizers and not even notice his taste.

Insane is threatening the establishment paedophilia. Why, we will see later.


10. Is Anon Insane?

As we said, Anon submitted 3 comments and most readers only noticed 2. One we spoke of above and the other we will speak of later.

But the reader didn’t notice the 3rd one because he submitted it to a different post, the “The reliability of the cadaver dogs” again in reply to a comment from an anonymous.

Again, we need to contextualize his participation.

Anonymous 29 Jan 2018, 14:36:00 replied the following to another poster:

“Anon29 Jan 2018, 07:26:00

Don’t you think that swinging was a plausible *initial* reason to simulate an abduction? The “big hitters” could have the Portuguese police under control with some appropriate political help, but what about the media? Who knows if some Portuguese journos would not find out about the swinging event and leak some names in the local press? Who is powerful enough to prevent that? Such scoop, even unlikely, would then be taken up in the UK and surely be devastating for some reputations, even more so if associated, loosely or not, with the death of a little girl, accidental or not.

In this scenario, the simulated abduction would be part of a quickly decided fallback strategy in the aftermath of Maddie’s death, the main goal of which was to exfiltrate some relevant people “incognito”. It is also possible that the McCanns accepted to play their role in the story on the promise of some kind of reward for being “helpful”, despite having *initially* nothing serious to fear on the judicial level. This would partly explain their pretty arrogant attitude.

Once the initial panic moment had passed, the motivation for the cover-up changed as a consequence of what this blog has called a “snowball effect”. With the PJ being less controllable than expected, there was some pressure to let the truth out, and that was probably possible without exposing the swinging, but not without exposing many people involved in the cover-up itself. And all this further escalated over time, with the government finally putting the whole reputation of UK on the line Operation Grange... Bloody dogs!

BTW, this is personal speculation. My view is clearly influenced by this blog, but may not be endorsed by the blog team.”

To this comment, Anon replied:

Anon 24 Feb 2018, 13:17:00

In a word...no.”

Could that be more Insane/Not Textusa/Walkercan1000?

No, it couldn’t. But he wasn’t. We had every reason to believe he was. The fact that when we were writing the post he did not reply to our 28 questions, the fact that when we contradicted his statement that the establishment only communicates with the same level people offline and don’t use social media, he also hadn’t reacted, his reference to the “establishment paedophilia” during Insane’s paedo offensive and the typical Insane one word answer above all made us believe that Anon was Insane.

But, after publication of this post, we have come to realise that Anon is someone who believes in the known as the COMARE one, which we strongly disagree with. Now is not the time to explain in detail why we disagree but can say we fail to see how any secret dealings at government level, nuclear or otherwise, could be used to hide the death of a little girl by drawing attention to that same death, nor are we able to see how a death that did not implicate in any way the government, nor was the government involved in the death, would the government bend back to comply to any sort of threat that was related to that death.

But, that is what the Anon believes in and we must respect that.

But the fact that we were wrong that Anon was not Insane, does not alter the fact that by thinking that he was, Anon had unwittingly pointed us in the right direction: that Insane was executing a Paedo offensive.

Anon not being Insane does not make unreal Insane’s unnecessary Malinka reference, his attack on Hill, his attack on the British immigrants and his attack on the establishment paedophilia via his vicious and abhorrent attack on Cristobell.

Insane had laid out the dots and Anon was the thread that helped us connect them.

Joining what Anon had said about the establishment paedophilia with all Not Textusa had blogged against this paedophilia under the guise of attacking Cristobell and with Walkercan1000’s tweets against Hill and the Brit immigrants, we were able to see that all was but an offensive against the establishment paedophilia on Insane’s part.

Now the reader can understand why, thinking that Anon was Insane, we replied to the above with the following:

Textusa 26 Feb 2018, 13:59:00

"Anon" 24 Feb 2018, 13:17:00

Thank you for such a CLARIFYING reply.

As usual, we can always count on you to clarify things, as you'll see in a forthcoming post.”

And as promised we are doing that.


11. Insane and messaging

Lastly, Anon’s (who we wrongly thought to be Insane) 3rd comment:

Anon 24 Feb 2018, 12:47:00

What i also mean is establishment don't threaten establishment using twitter warriors and media. Those threats and games are played well out of public view.”

To this we replied:

Textusa 26 Feb 2018, 13:56:00

"Anon" 24 Feb 2018, 12:47:00, 

"What i also mean is establishment don't threaten establishment using twitter warriors and media. Those threats and games are played well out of public view." 

When messages are sent to a collective, they have to be done publicly, usually done in a cryptic way so that the general public doesn't understand them but those meant to understand, do. 

Mind you, twitter warriors working for the establishment are only foot warriors and only have Twitter at their disposal to send out their threats.” 

As the reader has hopefully realised by now is that we had figured out that Insane wanted to threaten the establishment paedophilia into action and he only has social media with which he could do it.

Anon had helped us, unwittingly, get our ideas straight.

Social media is all Insane has and that is what he’s using. He’s a minion, he has no other means but by golly, he’s using it.

Insane as Walkercan1000 and as Not Textusa has put the foot down on the paedophilia pedal and floored it, he’s going full gas.

As if this is all he has, as if this is his last option.

But if has no more options, why not then the goal be to give the game away and expose all?

Because it’s his last option to cut a deal and he knows that even if he doesn’t get one, he’s too small to expose the truth.

If paedophilia was the BIG secret being hidden in the Maddie case, would he really be doing this paedo exposure? No, he wouldn’t.

He would divert the subject away from it and point all to swinging to distract. Instead, he and all others involved in the hoax have done the exact opposite for years.

Even if he doesn’t cut a deal and his future looks bleak, Murphy’s law that nothing is so bad that cannot be made worse, applies.

If he tries to expose anyone without due authorisation, that bleak future will be far, far bleaker.

No threats implied, all he has to do is look at the McCanns to understand.

It’s easy to understand why he’s doing it. It’s his last stand in his fight for survival.

He’s reminding those powerful paedos who his people have dirt on, that now is the time for them to put their shoulder to the wheel and to do all they can to stop the Maddie truth from being outed under the penalty of their truth being outed.

Whether he’s speaking only in his name, or together with others who are as uncomfortable as he is, we don’t know.

How much these powerful paedos should be scared or not by this threat is up to each one of them to know but as we said in our post “The Red Card”, we think Nessling’s sentencing was done by the government to show quite clearly that the word ‘paedophilia’ is not exactly a trump card Insane’s people hold any longer.

Yes, his people may have the information on these powerful paedos but the question one has to ask is if his people can really use it?

Like all those who have had the information about what really happened to Maddie and have not been able to use it for all these years, now the tables have turned and they just sit helplessly and uselessly on the information they have.

It’s that old question of “if a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?”, or in this particular case would be if one has the info but no one is willing to make it public, does one really have the info? No, even though one is holding it, one simply doesn’t have it.

So, it will be interesting to see what the reaction from the other side will be to this rebellious stance from one of their own, after having been through a really tough period with the “Gemma crisis”.


12. Silencing Insane

On the strategic/political level, the Gemma crisis has shown the UK how embarrassing the Maddie issue can be for its interests in these critical Brexit times.

What that article has shown, is that all a nation, any nation, has to do is wave the Maddie issue even just slightly by suggesting that it will allow one of its journalists to do an article with some “depth” on the subject, that it will weaken the UK’s position on anything.

And it has shown there’s absolutely nothing the UK can do about it if it decides to do that.

That’s how internationally embarrassing the Maddie case has become to the UK.

On the battlefield level, Insane has now become a liability.

Unfortunately, like the international politics have demonstrated, Twitter is literally at the touch of a finger.

Even if one is told to stop tweeting, all one needs is an internet provider, a mobile phone and some folly and there’s nothing stopping one from speaking directly to the entire world.

The same with blogging.

However, one can be convinced that it is in one’s own best interest to behave, paraphrasing one of Walkercan1000’s most used words and apparently that is what has been done in Insane’s case.

On Feb 22 he announced he was going to be absent:


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
Following my success last year in France, Spain, Amsterdam and Egypt my USA event kicks off next week. All tickets are sold. However, in Cuba, due to visa problems, the event is still not confirmed. Apologies, but my team r working hard to resolve the issue. #mccann #bamber #knox
1:40 pm - 22 Feb 2018

This was in the middle of the Cristobell blogging and before we mistook Anon for Insane.

On the next day he tweets normally, starts at 08:55 and during 3 hours and 20 minutes sends 15 tweets until 12:15.

Then, something strange happens, as he only sends 2 more tweets, 8 hours and 21 minutes later, at 20:36 and 20:39.

On his Cristobell blog he blogs only once, we don’t know at what time.

Then he’s absent on Feb 24 and on Feb 25 at 04:34, after being 1 day and 8 hours absent, he sends this tweet:


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
@lycamobile @LycamobileUK Previously working iphone 6 displays this error message in USA. Help required.
8:34 pm - 24 Feb 2018

One just has to google “The SIM Card inserted in this iPhone does not appear to be supported” to understand immediately how ridiculous this tweet is.

That screengrabbed message is received when an iPhone is blocked by a service provider. Only that service provider can unlock it.

Note, the message itself says it: “Please insert another SIM card from a supported carrier or request that this iPhone be unlocked by your carrier”.

Can’t Insane read what he has posted? If he can, then why is he posting it at all?

And a man so with so many FBI friends, or so he claims there is no one to help him out and tell him that the problem is solved by getting a cheap unblocked phone?

Apparently, his iPhone6 (which is not exactly a recent phone) worked fine in France, Spain, Amsterdam and Egypt last year, even though we are certain that if he was ever there as he claims and we very much doubt, there were different service providers so his SIM card didn’t work there either.

And, one is invited to go, supposedly to a conference in the US, knows he has a blocked phone and doesn’t take care of the issue before leaving?

But the big question that one has to ask, as was pointed out by one of our internet friend J privately, is how was he able to tweet that screengrabbed message?

His iPhone has no internet connection as he says, so even if that message has appeared offline and he can screengrab it, he has no way of sharing it to a laptop from which, supposedly he has tweeted it.

So how did that screengrab get out of an offline iPhone?

a screengrab from a mobile phone

Plus, it isn’t a screengrab taken on a mobile. Screengrabs done on mobiles are vertical rectangles and the screengrab annexed is a horizontal one.

That is much a screengrab from a mobile as Mona Lisa is the Eiffel Tower.

Lycamobile has a website:


In that website, it evidently has a “contact us” button which is what any normal human being uses first to contact Lycamobile and not go and look to see what the Twitter handle is the company uses there.

Insane, instead, decides to announce publicly his problem via Twitter.

Overegging the pudding to tell us all that he’s in the US.

He sends another tweet to Lycamobile 9 hours and 41 minutes later at Feb 25 14:15. That tweet we will analyse later in detail but just wanted the reader to understand that he asks Lycamobile for help twice with an interval of almost 10 hours.

How he “survived” without a phone for those 10 hours in the US, we don’t know.

Lycamobile, certainly not used of getting requests for technical help via Twitter, responds to both tweets 19 hours and 37 minutes later, on Feb 26 at 09:52 and 10:01 respectively.

And when does Insane, the desperate Insane with a blocked phone reply back to Lycamobike? 17 hours and 54 minutes later, on Feb 27 at 03:55 and 03:57, respectively.

And only after he tweeted a receipt from a restaurant at 03:53 which we will also deal with later.

Asks for help twice, gets on Twitter and his first priority is to tweet a receipt and not respond to Lycamobile.

So where was the urgency?

There wasn’t any, it was just him using Lycamobile to show the world that he was supposedly in the US.

But let’s get back to the second tweet asking for help from Lycamobile, the one he sent almost 10 hours after the first one:


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
Michael Walker Retweeted Michael Walker
@LycamobileUSA HELP REQUIRED.
6:15 am - 25 Feb 2018

Notice the all caps? Not ours but his.

Our internet friend J pointed this out to us.

A show of despair. He’s not calling for help from Lycamobile (as is later tweets would show) but asking for help. In all caps.

To those familiar with Walkercan’s tweets, we would say it was the first time we remember seeing him using all caps on a tweet. And one begging for help.

He not only was trying to tell everyone that he was in the US and he was in some sort of really big trouble, or so it seemed to him.


13. Insane and the restaurant

To overegg the already overegged pudding of him trying to show all that he was indeed in the US, he decides, as we said above, to tweet a receipt from a restaurant in Florida.

The receipt was allegedly issued on Feb 26 21:54 local time (16:54 GMT) for a meal of 3 for $136.80.

Before we show the tweet, it’s convenient to understand that in the McCann minion-world a receipt from a restaurant or from coffee shop constitutes proof of presence.

This became standard procedure, by coincidence (NOT) quite recently, more exactly on Feb 20 at 17:43  when minion-tweeter Loverandomleigh sent out the following tweet:


Rebecca@Loverandomleigh
Good morning @Trbnsky, wondered if you could tell me why your handwriting is the exact same as Walkers ?? Same arrow, same high up little c, is this just a McCoincidence too ?? (winking emoticon)
Walkers receipt on the left. If only we could ask Columbo (2 monocle emoticons)
(2 laughing emoticons)
#McCann #photoshopexpress
9:43 am · 20 Feb 2018 from Kildare, Ireland

The details of the photos above:


Did the reader notice that both are screengrabs from mobiles? Compare them with what Walkercan1000 posted when asking for help from Lycamobile.

To the Loverandomleigh tweet above Walkercan1000 replied with this on the same day at 20:06:


Michael Walker@walkercan1000
Replying to @Loverandomleigh and @Trbnsky
The one on the left is definitely mine. When I flew into Tallard last year.
12:06 pm · 20 Feb 2018

So, before getting into the details above, let’s fit this into the paedo offensive timeline: it all happened on Feb 20, the Loverandomleigh tweet was at 17:43, Walkecan1000’s reply was at 20:06 and the tweet accusing Hill was at 22:17. The blogging on his Cristobell blog would only start the next day.

Let’s then look at the tweet exchange.

Firstly, supposing it genuine, what does a receipt prove besides that a purchase was made at certain location at a certain time for a certain value of purchased goods?

If I have two friends one in South Africa and the other in Australia, and they both have a coffee say around 10:00 am on the same day and mail me the respective receipts, does that prove I was in those 2 countries at the same time? It doesn’t.

Secondly, what’s this about writing #McCann on receipts?

Is it a fad? A fetish? Are they being submitted to some accountant for reimbursement?

If so, where and who is managing such #McCann account?

Thirdly, why on earth would Loverandomleigh have in her possession, in original form or a photo of it (why take photo of a receipt?), a receipt of a purchase allegedly made by another person on June 30, 2017 at 22:37 in some Pizzeria in the South-East of France?

Fourthly and lastly, why on earth would Walkercan1000 want to have his handwriting recognised publicly? Yet, he does just that.

All the questions above have a simple answer: after this, the next time Walkercan1000 is to show a receipt with that handwriting and with the #McCann on it, it will prove without a doubt that he was where he will say he will be.

As we have said, Walkercan1000 is the other side’s top-minion, and he just told minion-tweeter Loverandomleigh what to do and the minion-tweeter Loverandomleigh did what s/he was told to do.

And when did the next Walkercan1000’s receipt appear publicly? In Orlando, Florida on Feb 26 21:54 local time (16:54 GMT) with his alleged handwriting on it as well as the #McCann:


Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
For those wishing violence towards me ( you know who you are, all threats were cached) you just missed me. LOL. Payback time for sponsors, fully sold tonight, great turnout. XXX #mccann (ps Havana STILL not confirmed, politics).
7:53 pm - 26 Feb 2018

“Payback” wouldn’t be a word we would use, we would rather say sponsors were being repaid for their outlay.

And let’s be honest but repaying sponsors who had arranged a “fully sold tonight, great turnout” conference with a $45.60 a head meal, seems to us either stingy or the event was indeed quite unimportant, if it ever existed, which we very much doubt.

We have checked and the restaurant is genuine and the dishes mentioned are in its menu:

- the Beef Tenderloin Medallions (Portabella Mushrooms, Balsamic Cream Sauce, Garlic Mashed Potatoes) does cost $31.50:

- the Chef KB's Lobster Carbonara (Spaghetti, Lobster, Smoked Bacon, Sugar Snap Peas, Truffle Cream Sauce) does cost $28.95;

- the Center-Cut Filet Mignon (8 oz., Italian Herbs, Asparagus, Garlic Butter, Steak Jus, Crispy Vesuvio Potatoes) does cost $34.50.

As we think the receipt to be genuine, we won’t go into how easy it is to create fake US receipts:

http://www.fakereceipt.us/sales_receipt.php

Knowing the IRS in the US does not joke around, we would also discard the possibility of the owner of the restaurant altering the cash register to give a receipt a fake date.

So, factually, a receipt has been exhibited with his alleged handwriting and the #McCann trademark on it by someone who really is trying hard to convince everyone that he is in the US.

But let’s pay attention to the content of the tweet. Please remember that this one is the one that follows the “HELP REQUIRED” one 37 hours before.

It’s easy to understand that the absurd claim of political problems around holding a conference in Cuba now that the country has long opened its borders to the world is just a justification for his forthcoming prolonged silence and most likely also for his physical absence from the UK.

But very interesting for him to have said “For those wishing violence towards me (you know who you are, all threats were cached)”.

As we have shown, we have been monitoring his Twitter account and publicly he has not received any threats.

We don’t know what sort of messages he’s getting via DM.

We are not seeing the so-called Twitter-antis sending him DM threats. We see them express their disgust for the man publicly.

For example, we do not wish the man any physical harm, however much we dislike him and we do. What we wish to happen to him, is for the police (please note that it’s the police and not anyone else) to identify this individual and legally charge him with his share of responsibility in the obstruction of justice in the Maddie case.


We also would like to see, after the police identify this man and link him to the Walkercan1000 Twitter account, for a British lawyer to offer up his services to Mr Amaral so he could sue him for all the libel he has committed against him.

This is no threatening, simply wishful thinking within the full boundaries of the law.

However, we would not disregard him getting real threats but from those he feels he should fear, threats coming from those that made him feel the compulsory need to fly to the US and give a conference there that is not to be found anywhere on the internet.

So, he may really be in the US and is not showing us all he is there but showing others that he is.

Making the paedo offensive threat from there as if to show how he really means it as he is outside the country and any move made against him for his arrest, for example, implicates first getting him and then extraditing him.

We repeat the interest we see in the use of the word “Payback” in the tweet.

When one only has Twitter to communicate and wants to convey a message, one has to be cryptic and subtle and payback has a very negative connotation.

We would like to point out that the owners of Boavista golf, Emerson Jones also have developments in Orlando, Florida.

He has threatened Hill, he has threatened the British immigrants, could he now be giving a coded message to the Boavista golf club in his tweet? Possibly.

For that reason we don’t think the use of green ink on the receipt was accidental. Especially if one takes into account that the waiter’s name has been blurred out with a blue ink pen.

We are not certain he is in the US as he could get that receipt in different possible ways, but we would say he is.

It’s evident that this paedo offensive took some planning.

And since Walkercan1000 has “left” the building the #McCann minions seem to have disappeared.


14. Conclusion

The Gemma O’Doherty has had a bigger effect than we even thought it had.

It has made Insane go rogue as because of it he may have felt the hairs on the back of his neck tingle really hard.

He certainly has pulled the last rabbit out of his hat by threatening the establishment paedophiles into action.

This is the reason we believe he has been silenced. Reading this he’ll probably tweet and blog something just to prove us wrong but his absent periods will grow longer and prove us right.

We have said that we think that Jim Gamble got to handle the Maddie case in the UK due to his performance with Operation Ore, which is alleged to have involved establishment paedophiles, many now publicly being targeted by the other side’s top minion Insane.

It will be interesting to watch the reaction of the other side about this rebellious behaviour. That’s why we will see how the minions will now act with this absence of leadership.

Insane was by far the most knowledgeable of the contents of the PJ Files. Without his help the minions are basically helpless.

If he returns, then that will mean that the other side has conceded to his blackmail. That would show a weakness that these people have never shown and if it happens we will be sincerely surprised.

It will also be interesting to watch the government’s reaction to the rebellion of one so relevant from the opposing camp.

If it continues to pursue the hoax, not only it will confirm its weakness before the other side, as now it will be seen as folding before the establishment paedophilia.

Finally, one cannot go without saying that during the entire month of February we had only 1 “event” supporting the closing of Operation Grange, and that was the Feb 9 Mirror article by Tom Pettifor and Tracey Kandohla “Madeleine McCann's parents have £750k in Find Maddie Fund to help find daughter if police probe is axed”, which was quickly rebutted 3 days later by having the Met ask for the funding of Operation grange to be continued.

The deadline for the decision to continue Operation Grange for another semester is April.

By now we would be expecting for much more action to have happened and all is so eerily quiet.

And there’s always a quiet before a storm.

And did the reader notice the faux pas, or maybe not, that Insane made when he responded to our blog?

We didn’t. It was our internet friend J who pointed it out to us. Let’s highlight that:

“Okay, folks, enough of this bollocks. The Maddie case has nowt to do with Brexit not least because the poor child had probably been DEAD for years before the Brexitshambles hove into view”


POST SCRIPTUM:

As we have recognised in our comment at 5 Mar 2018, 18:50:00, we have mistaken Anon for Insane.

As we strive only for truth and enjoy feeling comfortable with our consciences we had to correct the post accordingly-

Its message is not altered in any way: Insane in his Walkercan1000 and Not Textusa has, and is, executing and paedo offensive with the objective of pressuring the establishment paedophilia into action to stop the truth about Maddie from emerging.

For historic reasons, we will put here what we have changed in the post:


On #9. Insane and Anon

The original:

“And that decisive help came when he decided to comment as “Anon” in our blog, in our post from last week.”

Was corrected to this:

“And that decisive help came when an “Anon” decided to comment in our blog, in our post from last week.”

********

The original:

“But then Anon/Insane doesn’t want to make any sense. He just wants to send a very clear message.”

Was corrected to this:

 “But then Anon didn’t seem to us want to make any sense. He just wanted to send a very clear message.”

********

The original:

The paedophilia we think is involved in the case is the one Insane mentions: the establishment paedophilia.”

Was corrected to this: 

“The paedophilia we think is involved in the case is the one Anon mentions: the establishment paedophilia.”

******** 

The original:

“And with this comment he makes things clearer by putting a name to those powerful paedos he is threatening: the “establishment paedophilia”.”

Was corrected to this:

“And with this comment Anon makes things clearer by putting a name to those powerful paedos Insane was threatening: the “establishment paedophilia”.”


On #10. Why is Anon Insane?

The original:

“10. Why is Anon Insane?”

Was corrected to this:

“10. Is Anon Insane?”

********

The original:

“Could that be more Insane/Not Textusa/Walkercan1000? No, it couldn’t.

That told us that Insane was trying something on.

Joining this with what Anon – now knowing that he was Anon/Insane – had said about the establishment paedophilia with all Not Textusa had blogged against this paedophilia under the guise of attacking Crsitobell and with Walkercan1000’s tweets against Hill and the Brit immigrants, we could see that all was but an offensive against the establishment paedophilia on Insane’s part.

Now the reader can understand why we replied to the above with the following:”

Was corrected to this:

“Could that be more Insane/Not Textusa/Walkercan1000? No, it couldn’t.

But he wasn’t. We had every reason to believe he was. The fact that when we were writing the post he did not reply to our 28 questions, the fact that when we contradicted his statement that the establishment only communicates with the same level people offline and don’t use social media, he also hadn’t reacted, his reference to the “establishment paedophilia” during Insane’s paedo offensive and the typical Insane one word answer above all made us believe that Anon was Insane.

But, after publication of this post, we have come to realise that Anon is someone who believes in the known as the COMARE one, which we strongly disagree with. Now is not the time to explain in detail why we disagree but can say we fail to see how any secret dealings at government level, nuclear or otherwise, could be used to hide the death of a little girl by drawing attention to that same death, nor are we able to see how a death that did not implicate in any way the government, nor was the government involved in the death, would the government bend back to comply to any sort of threat that was related to that death.

But, that is what the Anon believes in and we must respect.

Anon not being Insane does not make unreal Insane’s unnecessary Malinka reference, his attack on Hill, his attack on the British immigrants and his attack on the establishment paedophilia via his vicious and abhorrent attack on Cristobell.

Anon not being Insane does not make unreal the Insane’s unnecessary Malinka reference, the attack on Hill, the attack on the British immigrants and the attack on the establishment paedophilia when attacking Cristobell.

Insane had laid out the dots and Anon was the thread that helped us connect them.

Joining what Anon had said about the establishment paedophilia with all Not Textusa had blogged against this paedophilia under the guise of attacking Cristobell and with Walkercan1000’s tweets against Hill and the Brit immigrants, we were able to see that all was but an offensive against the establishment paedophilia on Insane’s part.

Now the reader can understand why, thinking that Anon was Insane, we replied to the above with the following:”


On #11. Insane and messaging

The original:

“Lastly, Insane’s 3rd  comment as Anon:”

Was corrected to this:

“Lastly, Anon’s (who we wrongly thought to be Insane) 3rd  comment:”

********

The original: 

As the reader has hopefully realised by now Insane wants to threaten the establishment paedophilia into action and he only has social media with which he can do it.

The message above is him saying exactly that. That is what he has and that is what he’s using. He’s a minion, he has no other means but by golly, he’s using it.

Insane as Walkercan1000, as Not Textusa and now as Anon has put the foot down on the paedophilia pedal and floored it, he’s going full gas.”

Was corrected to this:

“As the reader has hopefully realised by now is that we had figured out that Insane wanted to threaten the establishment paedophilia into action and he only has social media with which he could do it.

Anon had helped us, unwittingly, get our ideas straight.

Social media is all Insane has and that is what he’s using. He’s a minion, he has no other means but by golly, he’s using it.

Insane as Walkercan1000 and as Not Textusa has put the foot down on the paedophilia pedal and floored it, he’s going full gas.”


On #12. Silencing Insane

The original:

“This was in the middle of the Cristobell blogging and before he came on our blog as Anon/Insane.”

Was corrected to this:

This was in the middle of the Cristobell blogging and before we mistook Anon for Insane.

105 comments:

  1. Hi Textusa, another good article,well researched by your selves congratulations. Perhaps if "Green Ink"is in America,he can get in touch with the Donald,46 POTUS for advice on his well researched child secrets?

    If has you say it is an attempt to cast aspersions to the "Known Individuals" who may have carried vile acts against minors,that they or their cronies are likely to unveil their knowledge to the public,Once and for all times sake,as Dirty Harry would say,"go ahead Punk,Make my Day",come on green Ink,you know your way to Portugal,don't you,have a nice day!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It’s very disheartening to see so many push this paedo link.
    Some genuinely believe it, others don’t , but to believe a government and police cover up of a large U.K. ring is to believe justice is perverted on a massive scale
    We know there have been cover ups in the past but not when the case is also covered by the police force of another country and never for abuse of children of this age.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 2 Mar 2018, 16:52:00,

      Unfortunately they are the vocal bullies on social media.

      Fortunately, the feedback we get from various sources, show us that a silent majority supports us.

      Reason why so many try to ridicule us and the swinging.

      As the Portuguese say "the voices of the dunce don't reach the sky" (vozes de burro não chegam ao céu)

      Delete
    2. Hi Anon 16.52. The Portugal PJ may not be involved with what happened to the original investigation on Madeleine McCann's disappearance,they were some what caught off guard on the Operation Grange Review,by David Cameron,they then made reparations of the reopening of the original case notes.
      It was only when super sleuth DCI Andy Redwood,revelation moment turned into a witch hunt for a "Portugal bungling burglar"wanting to access DNA of four Portuguese person's and what happened at the FSS in Birmingham,began to Ring alarm bells in their ears!
      Now four years later,what happened to that Thesis and Purple Woman,with the dead Paedophile husband,it seems every person in Portugal is was a suspect in the case,with special dispensations thrown for good measure to Simon Foys"Thesis",just listen to his explanation, it speaks volumes!

      Delete
  3. And it seems that Insane is back on Twitter.

    No, not as Walkercan1000. At least not yet. Him and he's team are too busy trying to solve the Cuba political problem.

    He has now a new handle. Won't reveal which is it yet. Will just observe.

    Clue, it fits totally with what has been said in this post.

    :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unpublished Anonymous at 2 Mar 2018, 20:45:00,

      Yes, that account.

      So obvious it hurts the eyes.

      We are not publishing your comment for now because we want to let him play around a little more, to see what he's up to with these new robes and see how many "Tiggers" fall for his act.

      Delete
  4. There seems to be a bit of activity directed at scorning your post Textusa - which means its very much on the right track!
    A great post, as usual, hitting many nails on the head. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 2 Mar 2018, 18:34:00

      As most people know, the Portuguese have a typical song which is called Fado.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fado

      There are 2 types of Fados. One from Lisbon and the other from Coimbra.

      In Lisbon, it was (and is) sung in small restaurants dedicated to the music even called Houses of Fado (Casas do Fado). Historically linked to the lower classes of society which found in the Fado a way of singing away their woes.

      In these restaurants, the applause at the end of each song is noisy. Even shouts of “Ah, Fadista!” to show the praise for what is been performed.

      In Coimbra, it was sung by the University students. Upper class people. To be applauded was beneath them, as they didn’t need such common display of recognition of their value.

      So, very little people know this, it became tradition that to applaud a Fado from Coimbra, one does not clap but clears one’s throat. As if pretending not to be applauding but producing a discreet sound recognising approval.

      It is quite spectacular on hearing the artist ending a song and an entire crowd clearing up their throats.

      This to say that there are many ways of applauding and of one understanding if one has hit the mark or not.

      A standing ovation is one of them but not the only one.

      About heckling, all we can say is that we know not of a single kind of spectacle where and heckler is welcomed or isn’t simply looked at as the fool he/she really is.

      Delete
  5. Unpublished Anon at 2 Mar 2018, 22:54:00,

    We repeat, we do not have an ISP to compare him with whatever your ISP might be, which we haven’t even tried to discover.

    We make deductions, we don’t rely on ISP identities.

    We have published your words, unaltered and even went to the effort of contextualising them.

    If it’s a case of mistaken identity, then only you can be certain.

    If you’re sincere, then you can be sure you’ve made your point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. I have no time for these disgusting creatures who troll for a shilling.

      Delete
  6. I remember when I first started to read your blog and thinking how swinging probably had nothing to do with this.How wrong I was.Your posts leave me with no questions only clarity.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Textusa,this latest post of yours has made me remember a conversation I watched being exchanged on Twitter a couple of years ago.It was the early hours of the morning and what caught my eye was two women discussing the McCanns.One of the women I'll call Ann was inferring that she had a friend who was in contact with one of the tapas 7.To my amazement she went on to say how the story had changed the next day,this friend could no longer talk about the case and she had recieved a legal letter which said this.Now of course this is Twitter & she wasn't saying anything that had'nd been suspected before.What struck me about this is that Ann deleted her tweets within minutes.A closer look at her account showed that she was a self confessed sex worker.Never once had she tweeted about the McCanns since.Her conversations on twitter talk about her extensive travel around the world.

    ReplyDelete
  8. http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/mccanns-and-other-victims-of-press-intrusion-say-they-have-no-confidence-in-government-after-leveson-inquiry-closure/

    1 of 24,489

    Hypocrisy of Mcs
    They paid for newspaper publicity
    £500k according to Bell Pottinger- Tim Bell.
    Narcissists are able to behave like this

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anon,
    Have been reading your comments and you're not making much sense:
    You say 'I don't think madeleine was raped and killed...i believe known paedos in establishment are having their predilections used against them to aid the cover up...'
    And you say ?Still think using paedophillia to hide swinging alone is too big a stretch though. The reverse would be far more likely.'
    Is swinging being used to cover-up the paedophilia that is being used to cover-up... what?
    I'm just not following

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is more than swinging being covered up...its a tool one side has in its armoury against another side with paedophilia its weapon. Its a game within in a game..a little girls death is being used to control individuals to do as they are told.

      Delete
    2. The comare nuclear link was a big part of it imho...especially as deals were being done to build reactors in portugal.

      Delete
  10. This seems to be Insane’s response in his blog to this post:

    “They're coming to take you away.........

    I will be blogging in more depth about Textusa's latest mad rant, but before I do, this needs saying.

    Maria, get some help.

    Cards on the table - I don't give a shit about you, frankly, but even so it is not pleasant to watch someone slide into mental illness and be egged on by sycophants and idiots.

    I don't know why you took it into your head that I am this Michael Walker character, but who knows why you take anything into your head? I have become, just like your obsession with swinging, invisible tables and grand conspiracies, another of your delusions. It matters not how many times I reiterate that you are wrong, you are utterly incapable of ever accepting that. You have never been able to - even when provided with proof of your error - like a video of a reporter sitting at the famous 'big round table' you swear never existed. You merely invent yet another narrative to try to explain away your error.

    However, what is genuinely disturbing now is the extent of your obsession.

    You appear to be reconstructing Michael Walker's day based on his tweets.

    You attempt to do the same to me, based on blog entries.

    You assail anonymous posters with aggressive replies because you believe them to be me.

    You even look up restaurants and check out the prices to see if a receipt is genuine

    These are not normal behaviours, Maria. I don't know how long you have spent doing this, but whatever the total, it is too long.

    However, this paragraph is the most revealing of all:

    “[Quoting us] For example, we do not wish the man any physical harm, however much we dislike him and we do. What we wish to happen to him, is for the police (please note that it’s the police and not anyone else) to identify this individual and legally charge him with his share of responsibility in the obstruction of justice in the Maddie case. [end of quote]”

    That suggests to me you really have lost all reason.

    So what I want you to do is this:

    Report him to the police. Report me to the police. Show them all your ''evidence'' and cyberstalking. Tell them we are obstructing justice.

    Because that might be the quickest way to get you the help with your mental problems that you so obviously need.

    Edited to add:

    Just spotted this

    “[Quoting us] Textusa2 Mar 2018, 23:45:00
    Unpublished Anon at 2 Mar 2018, 22:54:00,
    We repeat, we do not have an ISP to compare him with whatever your ISP might be, which we haven’t even tried to discover.
    We make deductions, we don’t rely on ISP identities.
    We have published your words, unaltered and even went to the effort of contextualising them.
    If it’s a case of mistaken identity, then only you can be certain.
    If you’re sincere, then you can be sure you’ve made your point. [end of quote]”

    That looks to me very much like one of the anonymous posters you insist was me has not taken too kindly to it. You should be careful, Textusa. It's not like you have that many readers to begin with, so you probably shouldn't shoot the ones you do have in the head.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Firstly: ONE swearword. Just ONE. How NOT Not Textusa is this? Please compare with Insane’s wording we have transcribed in the post.

      Secondly note, just whining.

      Thirdly, “I will be blogging in more depth…” when has EVER Not Textusa been this polite?

      Fourthly, “That looks to me very much like one of the anonymous posters you insist was me has not taken too kindly to it”.

      Why would in Insane’s opinion, someone not take kindly being mistaken for him? Shouldn’t that make him proud, to see that, supposedly, there are more like him, so many more that we are seeing him everywhere we look?

      Instead, he’s worried about our possible scarce readership and even advises us to cherish it, as if he’s worried about we not losing readers!

      Fifthly, no ref as to him having said that Maddie was dead.

      Clearly, someone impersonating Insane and doing a lousy job.

      Lastly, pretendy Insane, when you say “Report him to the police. Report me to the police. Show them all your ''evidence'' and cyberstalking. Tell them we are obstructing justice”, now that truth has yet to be surfaced you know you are simply asking us to go report to the Sheriff of Nottingham how naughty Guy of Gisborne has been.

      But times do change and when the Maddie truth will be fashionable, we trust justice will deal with how you, and others, have obstructed justice.

      Delete
    2. Pretendy Insane,

      When you say "You have never been able to - even when provided with proof of your error - like a video of a reporter sitting at the famous 'big round table' you swear never existed", do you mean this?

      http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/11/textusa-correcting-textusa.html

      http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2012/11/swan-lake-act-3.html

      Delete
    3. Totally agree Textusa - not a very good impersonation at all.... must do better next time..

      Delete
  11. All this Walker = Insane nonsense just emphasises how utterly clueless Textusa is regarding every aspect of this whole case.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps you’ll enlighten us?

      1: paedo?
      2: abduction?
      3: pizza gate?

      Do tell.

      Delete
    2. With every passing day an abductor is not found,the pro hangers on fall one by one.

      Delete
    3. Anon 08.25
      Ha ha!
      Why doesn’t Walker use his twitter to deny he’s a blogger?
      He says he doesn’t visit hate blogs, so he’ll be non the wiser about what Textusa is saying or if he is, he doesn’t care.
      And would he be worried about being confused with NT, who hates Textusa as much as Walker hates all antis?
      NT should contact Walker and ask him to put a disclaimer on twitter!
      Oh but Walker is not tweeting anymore, is he?

      Delete
  12. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Havana_Conference

    Will Insane's conference in Havana be like this? Lolol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.congressesincuba.com/en/events-and-congresses/2018

      We have checked conferences programmed for Havana, and no reference to anything possibly related to Insane.

      Interesting to notice that a conference about nuclear security has no political problems in being held:
      XI Congreso Regional de Seguridad Radiológica y Nuclear
      FROM APR 16, 2018 TO APR 20, 2018

      Delete
    2. It's been 7 days since he Insane has allegedly held his conference in Orlando, Florida.

      We are getting worried. He best solve his Cuba political problems because for someone who can only afford a $46 a head gratitude meal must not be running on a comfortable budget and hotel bills must be piling up.

      Delete
  13. Interesting tweet from a Pro-McCann

    https://twitter.com/FragrantFrog/status/970279775485988864

    Green Leaper‏@FragrantFrog
    Replying to @aFairDebate @CaroleShooter
    If the dog alerts had occurred at Murat's, he'd have been in jail by now & we wouldn't be here talking about it. #mccann
    4:48 am - 4 Mar 2018


    We remind readers that this frog was the fiercest Malinka supporter.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Why does Insane/NT want to distance himself so vehemently from Walker?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 4 Mar 2018, 17:14:00,

      Please see our reply at 4 Mar 2018, 23:36:00

      Delete
  15. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5721746/haunted-kate-mccanns-50th-birthday-tinged-with-sadness-as-scotland-yard-probe-draws-to-a-close-but-madeleines-family-insist-they-will-never-give-up-the-search/amp/

    'MY BABY'S NOT WITH ME'
    Haunted Kate McCann’s 50th birthday tinged with sadness as Scotland Yard probe draws to a close – but Madeleine’s family insist they will never give up the search

    A pal said: 'Kate’s big birthday is another tough date for her.'

    EXCLUSIVE
    By Tracey Kandohla
    4th March 2018, 3:26 pm
    Updated: 4th March 2018, 4:48 pm

    KATE McCann celebrates her milestone 50th birthday tomorrow and hopes police will continue the search into daughter Madeleine’s disappearance.

    Close friends and family will help her mark the special occasion which will be tinged with sadness as the haunted mum is still no closer to knowing what happened to Maddie after nearly 11 years.

    A pal said: “Kate’s big birthday is another tough date for her. While celebrations go on there is a always a reminder that Madeleine, who would now be a teenager, almost 15 years old, is still missing.

    “Kate’s only birthday wish is to find out what happened to her eldest child and she hopes and prays that police will be granted extra funds to carry on their important work to help find her.”

    In a past interview with The Sun she said: “We just want to know if she is alive or dead. The worst thing is not knowing.”

    Met Police assigned to Operation Grange have less than four weeks left of guaranteed funding.

    They applied to the Home Office mid last month for more money to “pursue one significant final line of inquiry” but as yet no decision has been made.

    One of Kate’s pals said: “They’re trying to keep her buoyed up and helping her celebrate a significant birthday. It’s a few months of milestones – the twins became teenagers last month, Kate’s turning 50 and Gerry’s 50th birthday is in June.

    “While the family’s determined to have fun and enjoy as normal a life as possible, these occasions are marred with a tinge of sadness because Madeleine is not here to join in the celebrations.”

    Kate and heart doctor husband Gerry, 49, of Rothley, Leics, celebrated twins Sean and Amelie turning 13 on February 1 with prayers too for Maddie “wherever she is.”

    Next Sunday Kate will face her 11th Mother’s Day without Maddie – a day she has previously described as painful and “a constant reminder that one of my babies isn’t with me.”

    The brave parents cling onto a glimmer of hope that Maddie, who was snatched as a three-year-old, could still be alive.

    (Cont.)

    ReplyDelete
  16. (Cont.)

    They believe she was taken by a child trafficker, sex predator or during a bungled burglary at her family’s holiday flat in the Algarve resort of Praia da Luz in May 2007.

    Family spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: “Kate and Gerry are extremely grateful to police for all they have done and are doing in the continued search for Madeleine .

    “They are very encouraged that there remains work to be done that requires a request for an extra budget and they remain thankful to the Home Office for considering it.”

    The current funding of £154,000 runs out at the end of this month. It is understood cops are seeking an extra £150,000. The inquiry has already cost the taxpayer £11.2million.

    Home Office spokesperson said: “The Metropolitan Police has made a further application for funding, which is currently being considered. A decision has not yet been made.”

    A SY spokesperson said: “The inquiry has not reached a conclusion and we’re hoping to continue with focus and determination.”

    The McCanns have nearly £3/4million saved in a fund to help find their daughter – giving them a lifeline if the police hunt is axed next month.

    ________________________________________

    We pay for your stories! Do you have a story for The Sun Online news team? Email us at tips@the-sun.co.uk or call 0207 782 4368. We pay for videos too. Click here to upload yours.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The ever reliable Kandohla.

      No Colin Sutton. Disappointed.

      Now Kate's birthday is a newsworthy event.

      How does Kandohla know how much funding Operation Grange has at the moment? Is Operation Grange running their expenses through the Sun?

      Delete
    2. From the article.
      "They believe she was taken by a child trafficker, sex predator or during a bungled burglary at her family’s holiday flat in the Algarve resort of Praia da Luz in May 2007".
      Compare this with Brunt sept 2017.
      "Early ideas about sex predators, child traffickers and "a burglary gone wrong" were largely dismissed before both detective teams joined forces to focus on the latest theory".

      Delete
  17. Insane is back to his blogging.

    The supposedly same person who yesterday said “I will be blogging in more depth “ has today provided that deep analysis of his.

    Please compare the language and the style used in this post and yesterday’s one and come to your conclusion if it’s the same person.

    Insane is back on his blog. On Twitter, he seems a little bit more shy. We will keep watching.

    If the readers wish to entertain themselves, do count the times he stresses he’s not Walkercan1000. We haven’t.

    If he wasn’t, would he really be that bothered if we were wrong? No, he would be laughing.

    And if we don’t have any credibility as he says we haven’t, then why is he worried we say he’s Walkercan1000?

    We have taken out what we wrote and he copied to the blog (the same thing we did in the current post):


    “Evening all.

    Well, having read Textusa's latest, I can only really plead with her carers to review her medication and perhaps double it

    (It's either that, or triple mine.....)

    [The only caption he put on the photo was this ]Textusa's carers were in a quandry - should they own up that they'd lost her, or hope she'd return to the zoo when she was tired?

    Yes, we know.

    Again, neither I, nor this blog, has anything to do with Mr Walker

    Of course it was. Matron, the syringe please .

    I literally have no idea who she is talking about now, seeing as she thinks I am lurking behind every account

    And who would that be? The PM? His Holiness the Pope? The Dalai Lama?

    Let's make something clear. The only person who has ever suggested I have anything to do with him is you. You have absolutely no basis for this false claim, you literally just made it up, and you seem to think that repeating it endlessly will make it true. Well, it won't, any more than repeatedly shrieking "Swingers!" will make that true.

    That has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with you. I know that is difficult for you with your textusa-centric view of the world, but that's just tough.

    Are the words "Coming soon - bookmark the page" that difficult for you to understand?

    He is not me.

    I abandoned it because I could no longer be arsed. I can barely be arsed now.

    Some of us have lives, dear. Plus, it takes that long to read one of your nonsense posts

    He is not me

    Oh good.

    Hmmm - dilemma.

    (Cont)

    ReplyDelete
  18. (Cont)

    None of this will make any sense without the context, so I'll just delete it all. You know where to find it if you want to read it.

    No, that was what I had to say after putting about 15 minutes thought into it. You don't merit any more effort than that, dear.

    You cheeky fucker

    Of course you would

    It doesn't bother me one iota. It just makes everything that you subsequently say utterly meaningless, as it is entirely predicated on your insistence that I am him

    I think he was taking the piss, Maria

    See what I mean?

    Why not? You were the one trying to weave yet another conspiracy around it

    Read the fucking newspaper report, Einstein.

    I said nothing about why he tweeted it, nor could I give a shit.

    Thank you

    Is there a translation available?

    No dear, I was taking the piss out of you

    No dear, I was taking the piss out of you

    Have you ever heard of a teaser campaign, Textusa? Go look it up.

    I don't think you quite understand the concept. Cristobell, like you, is a liar. Her posters have been having problems with her refusing to publish their replies if they undermine her position - like you. So now they can send them to me and I make sure they are published. I am not interested in commenting on her blog.

    Whereas I critique your nonsense blogs.

    See the difference?

    You really need to find a job.

    No, you are monitoring someone else's ''McCann case activities''. Or 'stalking', as the police call it.

    Oh dear, how little you know

    She's almost as mad as you are.

    I haven't dismissed anything

    I have no twitter account

    Ah yes, the typical approach of a bully. I think Tigger is able to look after herself.

    Because it wasn't me

    He isn't me.

    He isn't me.

    (Cont)

    ReplyDelete
  19. (Cont)

    He isn't me.

    He isn't me

    He isn't me.

    He isn't me.

    Oh for fuck's sake.

    Have you? How was that, then?

    I have no relationship with Martin Smith

    Nope.

    Ah - I see the problem. He isn't me.

    Yeah - none of this is anything to do with me, so........

    I literally have no idea what you are rambling on about

    Er no, on account of him not being me.

    And your point is?

    No, not me. Your friend Mr Walker.

    Nope

    Nope

    Nope.

    Indeed they won't, because he never said that. Martin Smith has, to the best of my knowledge, never changed his position at all.

    So why are you asking me about it?

    It confirmed my own belief, yes.

    The 'distress call' you made up, dear.

    I have never spoken to Smith.

    I have never tweeted to or at or about Gemma O'Doherty

    I doubt that very much.

    What?

    Okay, I'm bored with this now. There is very little point continuing because as you understand perfectly well, Textusa, I am not Michael Walker. I don't know what bizarre thrill you get from this, but it's just really tiresome

    What I will do is interject here

    In all seriousness, what you are doing is cyberstalking, especially in the monitoring of his internet activity - that is actually one of the hallmarks of a cyberstalker. If he was to make a complaint, you could find yourself in rather a lot of trouble.

    (Cont)

    ReplyDelete
  20. (Cont)

    And now, for those of you who couldn't read them the first time........

    he isn't me.

    He isn't me

    He isn't me

    He isn't me

    He isn't me

    He isn't me

    No dear - that's a blank, default page

    What are you on about?

    He isn't me

    He isn't me

    I'm not going to discuss another blog and comments left by others.

    Ditto

    As I stated some time ago, I would not be commenting on your blog again. The fact that you are imagining that I left anonymous posts is a symptom of your obviously deteriorating mental health.

    And anyone who has ever read my blog would know I would never express an opinion like that, so why you would think so is utterly beyond me.

    There now follows an interminably dull bit about the standoff she had with some anonymous poster. I literally can't be arsed, nor with her regular attempts to drag swinging in.

    See you on the other side.

    So you think I am using the comments page on an obscure and barely-read blog written by a certified lunatic to threaten establishment figures?

    You are even more demented than I thought, and I thought you were a raving lunatic.

    Yes, I'd be interested to know how you arrived at this erroneous conclusion

    No, I have submitted no comments on your blog, anonymous or otherwise, since I stated that all comments would be confined to my own blog

    It wasn't me

    That tells me that you are suffering from paranoid schizophrenia

    Yes, because you are quite, quite mad

    Yeah - not me, sorry

    Okay readers - there now follows a long diatribe from her looniness. She displays clear symptoms of mental illness throughout, including paranoid delusions. Please be gentle with her, she can't help it. Having said that, have a big syringe full of ketamine ready in case she gives her carers the slip

    Seriously dear, take your meds

    No it hasn't

    (Cont)

    ReplyDelete
  21. (Cont)

    Have I? Oh dear, that's a bit of a fucker

    He isn't me

    I wouldn't know dear, on account of not being him

    No dear, I'm right here. No idea where Mr Walker is

    You do know that carrying out and then publishing this sort of surveillance on a private individual is actually an offence, don't you? Just thought I would mention that in the spirit of helpfulness.

    I think your internet friend J probably needs to get themselves looked at too

    And once again, it isn't me.

    All fascinating stuff, but sadly for you it is nothing to do with me.

    That is serious paranoia. You need help.

    So let me get this straight: you have researched every conference in the United States to see where he is? Maria, this is seriously disturbed behaviour which could get you into a world of trouble. So do carry on........

    Is that what you were ostensibly talking about? Jesus.

    Oh really? 😁

    What? Where?

    Wait - so if I am here, it makes your prediction a pile of shit? Okay ..........

    What is your issue with that? It is nothing to do with Brexit and I have always maintained that Madeleine was almost certainly dead on the night she disappeared, years before the Brexit vote
    Anyhoo, here is a word to the textaloons

    If you actually give a shit about your glorious leader, you might want to give her some advice. Her behaviour is seriously disturbed and disturbing. Stalking people and then inciting others to take acts of retribution is a serious crime. I don't know how much internet access she would be allowed from jail, but if you want to continue to be bored shitless on a weekly basis, you ought to tell her to behave herself

    Oh - and a quick PS

    She has responded to my previous post. Apparently:

    [Quoting us] Clearly, someone impersonating Insane and doing a lousy job. [end of quote]

    So now the only one writing who is actually me, and not a figment of her imagination, is an impersonator.

    Readers, she is fucking nuts.”

    ReplyDelete
  22. This is a reply to the comment made by Anonymous 4 Mar 2018, 17:14:00 that because of Kandohla’s and Insane’s long in-depth-I’m-not-him reply.

    Anonymous’ question was “Why does Insane/NT want to distance himself so vehemently from Walker?” and the reply to it seems to us very apt to come after his thought-out reply:

    Anonymous,

    Thank you for that question.

    The answer lies in the purposes of the characters and the costumes each pretends to be wearing.

    Not Textusa seeks to be credible. Reason why people who hate our guts find him amusing and interesting.

    Walkercan1000 doesn’t give a penny about credibility. He’s a master of the current politics. He doesn’t care about facts, only about what is said in the moment. He lies. He invents, counting on the fact that the interlocutor is caught off-guard and is not able to deny what he has just said.

    When caught out lying he shuts up about for a couple of hours, days or weeks and then repeats over and over what he has been caught out over and over. He doesn’t care. He just wants soundbites.

    He also distorts fact. A raindrop is water, so he’ll state it is a hurricane or a drizzle depending on the convenience, as both involve the water that makes that single raindrop.

    Not Textusa does not deny fact. He seeks credibility. So unlike Walker, Not Textusa cherry-picks facts from the files or articles, takes them out of context and gives them meanings they don’t have in the context in which they were originally stated. He then says we can’t read the facts.

    The most telling difference between the 2 are the dogs. Walkercan1000 simply slates them. They are useless and ridiculous. For Not Textusa they are reliable (but only when convenient). They are so reliable they are able to pick up a cadaver scent that simply wafted into the apartment we don’t know from where.

    For Not Textusa, the problem with the dogs is that they are too reliable. Yes, they picked up the scent but because their noses are so good it is possible to say that it is cadaver scent but not possible to determine if that scent even came from the apartment.

    Not Textusa plays with facts, distorts things but always underlining his credibility. He says that he is a dog believer, but as shown above he’s a dog denier. For him, the EVRD dog is as reliable as described above but Keela, not that much. Ask him if Keela’s signalling confirms the existence of blood in the apartment and he will do a Walkercan1000 and change the subject.

    For that reason, it has been interesting to watch the irony of someone whose name reflects a faith in the dogs, to find Not Textusa, a dog denier, amusing.
    https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/970271150847811584

    Walker’s lack of credibility is what affects Not Textusa and from which he must dissociate from. He, who says Eddie is able to pick up wafting cadaver scent, cannot be seen as the same person who says that Grime’s useless dogs can only smell pork (without explaining why the McCanns decided to hold some sort of barbeque in that corner of the living room and in the closet).

    Walkercan1000 and Not Textusa pursue the same objective but have conflicting personalities, and for Not Textusa to be exposed as Walker, it destroys his reputation which his basically built on the dislike, even hatred, that some have for us. They see him as our enemy so take him as their friend.

    No one in their right mind trying to be an anti will support Walkercan1000 because the man is absurdly radical

    But with Not Textusa, because he puts on an aura of credibility as he quotes what appears to be facts, he gains support from those against us.

    One also has to understand the difference in purpose. Insane as Walkercan1000 has the purpose to drive people away from the #McCann. Not Textusa has the objective to make us, specifically, look off-putting.

    One is more generic and so can be absurd, the other is more specific, and has to work on his image of credibility. Not Textusa cannot afford to be confused with Walkercan1000. And everyone knows he’s the one and the same.

    Hope we have answered your question.

    ReplyDelete
  23. In the dark sun article you posted above this is what jumped out.
    "The McCanns have nearly £3/4million saved in a fund to help find their daughter – giving them a lifeline if the police hunt is axed next month."
    Well if they have they have that much money why do they not give this money to Grange to continue ......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Su,

      Firstly, nobody can fund a police investigation when they are involved in some way with that investigation.

      The police must be seen as acting independently and not subject to any influence like funding, from any quarter other than government funding.

      Secondly, and it is something the public should really ask is where have these millions come from because last time they published their accounts, the figure was nowhere near as it was referred to the end of March 2017, there was still the money to be paid to the Portuguese Justice system for court costs and for , allegedly, the ECHR process.

      Where have these millions come from?

      The British media with the money the fraudulent fund has at a certain moment of time is like Walkercan1000 with facts, it just invents what is convenient to say it has at that particular moment.

      Delete
    2. The police must be seen as acting independently and not subject to any influence like funding, from any quarter other than government funding.....agree....but

      Of course Leicester Police did have a direct link to Find Madeleine website and Gerry spoke at a CEOP confrence...but....apart from that as Monty Pytgon team once said....

      Delete
  24. Have the McCanns paid Amaral yet?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 5 Mar 2018, 08:16:00,

      To be very clear, the McCanns do not owe a cent to Mr Amaral.

      What they owe, if they haven't already paid and which we don't know, is the Court costs and Mr Amaral's legal fees.

      So, again, if they haven't paid, they only owe money to Mr Amaral's lawyers and to the Portuguese Justice System.

      There was a rumour that the court had not yet returned his seized assets.

      We don't know if this was true but can only say that if that was the case, it would be only concern money assets. The state has to pay interests, which are quite high, and there has to be an agreement by the parties of what the due amount is.

      Once agreed, the Ministry of Justice has to approve the payment out of its budget, in which which we believe it has a fund meant for these cases.

      It's all procedural and as we have seen, procedures take long in Portugal but this time, with each passing day, the amount due to Mr Amaral in question grows bigger.

      But, and going back to your question the legal relationship between Mr Amaral and the McCanns has ended with the Acórdão of the Portuguese Supreme Justice Court.

      Between these 2 parties, no one owes anything material to the other.

      Delete
  25. https://mobile.twitter.com/CaroleShooter/status/970265821313413120

    Someone is saying you made a bad call...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 5 Mar 2018, 08:53:00,

      We used a popular Portuguese saying.

      Its literal translation is “Donkey voices don’t reach heaven”.

      However, it is a word play. In Portuguese the word “burro” besides being used to identify an animal, has a popular pejorative use, which is to call a person stupid, a fool: “Não sejas burro” means “Don’t be stupid/a fool”.

      We find donkey’s to be very intelligent animals, so writing the literal translation would make the English speaking miss the point of the saying.

      Dunce, has in our opinion, the meaning intended.

      Another popular expression we could have used “the dogs bark and the caravan passes” (os cães ladram e a caravana passa).

      It was addressed to verbal bullies. People who dominate a conversation and stop others from voicing their opinion.

      Anyone offended by our words is assuming they are vocal bullies. Or as the Brits say, if the caps fit, wear it, if it doesn’t, don’t.

      Delete
  26. Something the blog fully agrees with:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/The_Truth_II/status/970677804756099073

    “The Ponce of Dubai@The_Truth_II
    very embarrassing for chief #McCann groupie Walkercan saying he'd met Mr Smith & insisting @gemmaod1 was lying when she said she had .Made Walker look a complete idiot.maybe Mr Smith was glad to unburden himself after all these years #smithman #Panorama #lies #Bias
    3:09 pm · 5 Mar 2018”

    ReplyDelete
  27. We have said that when one is shown to be wrong and the mistake was out of ignorance, one should be happy to correct one’s hand because one has been enlightened.

    When one is shown one is wrong and the mistake was because one was indeed mistaken, one only has to be happy for having been shown the opportunity to correct the path one is treading.

    That said, we inform our readers that we have now concluded that Anon we have mentioned repeatedly in the post, is not Insane.

    We have come to the conclusion from Anon’s comments after the post was published.

    Credit has to be given to Anon who stood his ground and showed us to be wrong. From what we understood Anon is someone who believes in the COMARE theory.

    We have now corrected the post accordingly.

    We have now published a Post Scriptum to the post where we have shown what we have corrected.

    As we say in that Post Scriptum, the post’s message is not altered in any way: Insane in his Walkercan1000 and Not Textusa has, and is, executing and paedo offensive with the objective of pressuring the establishment paedophilia into action to stop the truth about Maddie from emerging.

    As always, in pursuit in the truth and as always, correcting ourselves when we see that we are wrong.

    We have to live with our consciences and persisting in error out of pride or stubbornness is not our way of living life.

    Lastly, we would like to thank Anon for having corrected us.

    Our sincerest apology is to him for linking his name to such an objectionable character.

    ReplyDelete
  28. And Insane, as Not Textusa has blogged again. Third time in 3 days. Meanwhile, at this exact moment Walkercan1000 has not tweeted for 06 days, 18 hours and 26 minutes.

    We are publishing what he has written again uncensored but this time, one thing is to be noted: we have not deleted anything we have written. This is the full post:

    “Cards on the table, fucktard

    In her latest reply to a question, idiot Textusa closes with :

    [Quoting us] Not Textusa cannot afford to be confused with Walkercan1000. And everyone knows he’s the one and the same.

    Hope we have answered your question. [end of quote]

    As usual, Maria is treating everyone with contempt. So ''everyone knows he's one and the same'', do they?

    Okay - here is a challenge to you:

    Without wittering on for page upon page of meaningless drivel, explain, in no more than two paragraphs, how you come to believe this?”


    First, to Insane. You do not challenge us to anything. Much less tell us in how many words we are to say whatever we wish to say. But so you know, one of the reasons that we know that you are both the same person is that arrogant personality of yours that makes you think that you may walk in grocery, a butchery or even in a court and order the grocer, the butcher or the judge on what they are to do.

    But then reality bites. You are just who you are and you are not that grandiose self you have convinced yourself you are.

    Don’t flatter yourself. We are not debating with you. We are publishing your words because they help us prove a point.

    You are a minion, trained to show your teeth to try and get us scared. But to get what you want, you have to turn to whoever holds your leash, sit, wag your tail and if you do it nicely and be an obedient boy you may even get a biscuit.

    Now go away and go amuse those who find you amusing, like the ones who think your Cristobell Unhinged blog (which we have said to be absolutely abhorrent) is “a hoot” even though we fail to find in it a single piece of humour, even by your sick standards.
    https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/970382351153983488

    By the way, we hope you understand that not many of those who have read that blog realise that in blue it’s not supposed to be you. It’s supposed to be someone who you say has been unable to post their comments on Cristobell. But it’s clear to all that it’s you, again, impersonating someone else and doing the usual bad job in going about it.

    Now to those who matter, our readers.

    As we have noted, this time he didn’t copy fully our comment. He just put in what was convenient. Why? Because we mention Keela and Insane runs away from her as the Portuguese say as “the devil runs from the cross” (o diabo foge da cruz).

    But what is interesting to note is that Insane has been allowed back to blogging and that Walkercan1000 has been ditched.

    As we said in our comment at 4 Mar 2018, 23:36:00 “Insane as Walkercan1000 has the purpose to drive people away from the #McCann. Not Textusa has the objective to make us, specifically, look off-putting.”

    The first conclusion to take is simple. If Walkercan1000 has been shut down and Not Textusa continues to be allowed to blog, that means the other side’s reaction to Insane’s rebellion was to turn all their guns on us on social media and abandon that repugnant Walkercan1000 character on the eyes of the “outside” Maddie world.

    The reason has to do with the dogs as Not Textusa’s supposed belief in the dogs may come in handy in the future while Walkercan1000’s dissing of them is now a liability.

    (Cont)

    ReplyDelete
  29. (Cont)

    To shut down one and allow the other to continue, it tells us that the other side is exploiting Insane’s rebellion against the establishment paedos.

    This has 2 objectives, separated in time. One until the truth is outed and another if and after that happens.

    Until the truth is outed, it’s to maintain the pressure on the establishment paedos and getting them to stop the truth to get out.

    But, and as is most likely, if the truth is unable to be stopped, they will revert to the next objective: mystifying Maddie’s death into a paedo one.

    Until the truth is outed, Not Textusa will continue to defend the reliability of the cadaver dog with that caveat that it is cadaver odour but it does not determine that it’s from the apartment and will continue silent about Keela.

    After the truth is outed, Insane will start to defend that he has always maintained that the BOTH dogs were reliable, so even though the cadaver dog doesn’t determine the body was in the apartment, Keela is the one – because he always maintained that the dogs are reliable – proving that the body had been indeed there.

    Remember this is to happen only after truth has been outed. The media will be reporting that Maddie did indeed die in that apartment so Insane will just be confirming it but boasting that he had always said it.

    However, until truth outed he best remain silent about Keela because truth may never emerge. The moment he recognises Keela the dam has burst.

    But NOW the pressure on the establishment paedos has to be maintained. Why?

    Because if the truth is indeed outed, they are counting on the good people of the internet who honestly believe in the paedo theory. For them, Maddie was the victim of a nepiophile and anything that anyone, even the government, says in the contrary to that, it is a cover-up.

    The idea is to then kill the true story as quickly as possible in the media and let paedo death grow legs as fast as possible on the internet.

    Even If the McCanns come out and say it was all a cover-up for a swinging holiday and even if Operation Grange says the same, then the obsession of the paedo-theory subscribers is to be explored.

    No matter how transparently and backed-up the truth is to revealed there will always be the die-hards that will say that it was paedophilia, period.

    The “unknown powerful British paedo” who really killed and raped Maddie and is being protected theory will emerge and the McCanns will go from the evil couple to being patsies, protecting that evil powerful one the establishment insists in protecting.

    Operation Grange will be closed, and things will be left to the social media in which, whatever fate justice determines for the McCanns it will all just be a cover-up.

    Plus, the campaign now set by the other side on pushing paedo (again we ask if it was THE secret would they be doing it?) will provide that aura of mysticism required for the “unknown powerful British paedo” theory to fully blossom.

    That’s why Walkercan1000 needs to shut up about pork and the uselessness of the dogs. The dogs may be required to confirm that Maddie did die in that apartment and dissing them is counter-productive.

    What needs to be fed now is that it was a powerful establishment paedo whodunnit.

    The more focus is put on paedophilia now, the better are the odds that the swinging truth will last as much as the “sex-pest” list did last year, and that all the attention will quickly divert towards paedophilia which, they hope, the social media will be bursting with.

    And the Maddie case although solved, will continue in time as one of history’s biggest mysteries.

    (Cont)

    ReplyDelete
  30. (Cont)

    For the government, the case will be closed and it can rest in peace, as the internet no matter how hard they look for stuff to support their theories they won’t as there’s nothing to be found.

    For the other side, it will be a burden lifted.

    It will just have to let that unpleasant moment pass and then sit back and watch people fighting and bickering until patience wears out and only always resistant nutters remain.

    After all, all will have been revealed but no one will really have paid attention to it, so will quickly be forgotten.

    This is the reason why we are witnessing their Twitter minions cosying up to the fiercest anti “paedo-believers”.

    These people need watering now and are being watered with plenty of it.

    And it’s also the reason why the blog has be fought and shown as off-putting as possible.

    Thus Not Textusa’s hyper-activism.

    To be clear. If Operation Grange concludes that it was a nepiophile who killed Maddie and presents the appropriate proof, we will be in the front-line accepting the truth and recognising we were wrong all these years.

    We are not trying to sell a theory, we are trying to find the truth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems Insane blogged again before we published this comment.

      That would make it 4 times in 3 days.

      Very active indeed.

      Delete
    2. Thanks, it does explain why Insane is putting in the extra effort in dissociating himself from Walker

      Delete
  31. Agree with that, all makes sense.

    Question is, will SY follow this scenario or will they now pursue a truthful ending?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 6 Mar 2018, 09:30:00,

      The scenario above IS the truthful ending.

      What we described is what will be attempted to smother its impact on the public opinion by creating the idea that the truth is just the cover-up continued.

      Delete
  32. Keep trying to find the truth Textusa. It all makes sense to me that they would would be trying to divert the truth, and what better way than to push a theory contrary to the truth. Hopefully people will see what you see clearly and the truth will out. Thank you for helping me make sense of it all. I’m sure the paedo element is there in the background, but not directly involved with Maddie or her disappearance.
    It’s good to see you stand up to your mistakes and admit when you are wrong. I for one respect that greatly.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Textusa, don't you think that Gemma O'Doherty has unwittingly helped this "paedo offensive"?

    It is a disturbing coincidence that her name is strongly associated with the Mary Boyle case, in which she quite openly supported the theory that the murderer was a paedo protected by the Irish establishment. This fact has unavoidably led the public to make a mental association between both cases.

    Some of the tweets she sent in January suggest that she may sincerely believe that both cases are related to paedophilia. Could it be the reason why she was "picked" to write a "truthful" article about the Maddie case before realizing that she had been played? I know you have presented a slightly different interpretation, in which the "other side" did not have the initiative, but this coincidence is rather strange considering the current Insane's surge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 6 Mar 2018, 11:28:00,

      We can’t speak for Gemma O’Doherty but she may be connecting the 2 cases because she sees the disappearance of both girls as linked to paedophilia.

      In addition, there are the Irish connections- Donegal being the place both families had connections with and the Smith family living in Drogheda.

      As we said, we believe someone motivated Gemma to choose to write about this particular subject, knowing her independence and her passion for the Boyle case. And as is our belief, the Maddie case has been efficiently poisoned with paedophilia, so we imagine with no fault of her own, that she felt attracted to it and write with her usual passion about it.

      It must be pointed out that in her tweets she pointed towards sedation. None of the paedo elements that in our opinion are “infecting” the case was shown in any of her tweets.

      As the end-result did not contain anything related to the Boyle case, the Insane’s paedo offensive was not in our opinion, even unwittingly, helped.

      We do wonder what opinions Colin Sutton may have shared with her on the subject of paedophilia in general or his thoughts about the motives of “Smithman”.

      If they even spoke with each other, as we believe that the “Sutton bit” was handed over to be included without any contact between him and the journalist.

      We do hope she will return to the subject and enlighten us. Our next post will be encouraging her to do so.

      Delete
    2. Thank you for your reply.

      To be specific, I got the impression that Gemma was in line with Wendy Murphy's theory

      http://www.patriotledger.com/article/20090328/NEWS/303289833

      because of her pointing to sedation, in addition to suggesting a link with paedophilia via the Mary Boyle case.

      This is speculation, of course.

      Delete
  34. In our comment at 5 Mar 2018, 22:23:00 we didn’t focus on one VERY IMPORTANT aspect which pushing the myth of an “unknown powerful British paedo” being protected BENEFITS SIGNIFICANTLY those who we believe were swinging in Praia da Luz at the time Maddie died there accidentally.

    We have said before, and have said also in the comment mentioned above, that if truth is outed, the news on it will quickly disappear.

    They will be very rapidly replaced by new ones in this voracious world of news-addicted modern world we live in.

    The news cycles are getting absurdly shorter and shorter. What was in the past said figuratively that something was yesterday’s news, is now said literally. We really mean yesterday.

    What happened yesterday has now become a long passed historic past. Yesterday’s news these days is what has happened the morning if we happen to be in the afternoon.

    But what we also have said is that the problem these swingers have is not with the national news or even local news but with their social circles.

    A social circle made up by their neighbourhood relationships, that of their parish, of their children’s school, of their workplaces. People who they greet every single or other day and who will never, ever forget that they were in Luz the truth is outed. When the papers’ headlines will be on that day, or possibly up to a week, about how Maddie’s death scandal had all been because they were covering-up a large swinging “party” which was taking place in Luz at the time.

    It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that our neighbours who we haven’t forgotten that were in Luz the week Maddie disappeared (even though more than 10 years have passed, we haven’t forgotten) to add two and two and conclude that they hadn’t gone on a family holiday after all as they always alleged they had when commenting the amazing coincidence of being there when Maddie disappeared.

    The conclusion that one will come to is simple: they were there because, well, because they are disgusting perverts.

    Yes, “disgusting perverts” are words we are using on purpose because that’s what the British society deems swingers to be even though what they do is completely and absolutely legal and between consenting adults.

    BUT, there’s a way the swingers can escape this fate.

    If the “death-by-paedo” campaign is successful, the swingers can always turn to these neighbours, look them in the eye, do a shake of the head together with a tut-tut and say in that patronising way only those with ‘inside information’ can that “…we were there, we know there was no swinging… the paedo they just continue covering-up for and protecting must really be powerful!”.

    And follow this with a long and prolonged sigh and end it with the punch-line: “… oh, the government and what it is willing to cover-up is really flabbergasting… one just has to go on the internet and see that there’s plenty of evidence that it was a paedo who killed that poor little girl”.

    And their life will simply continue because when their neighbours do go online, as what the swingers have said is what they will find.

    An internet blowing up with how a the “establishment paedophilia” had been able, again to protect one of their evil own.

    That is what the other side is hoping for and is betting all their chips on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree totally with what you are saying. The emphasis on 'what the neighbours will think' is very important. Everyone cares what the neighbours think. To dismiss swinging as not being important enough to warrant covering up a child's death is being naïve. Also, the higher up the social standing positions you are the more important it becomes to keep it under wraps. So, if you are a Consultant, GP, Magistrate, Judge, Lawyer, Solicitor and respected in your working life, you really do not want that respect diminishing which will automatically happen if it is discovered you swing. Maybe its not right or fair (seeing that swinging is legal) but it is true - you will be ridiculed and have fingers pointed at you. Hence these people like to keep their swinging activities away from their work, out the country if possible, and with people of similar social standing. It makes sense - they aren't going to tell on you if you don't tell on them.
      And yes, if the truth emerges, then it makes sense that their strategy is to blame it on a cover up of paedo activities...
      It all makes great sense now.. thanks Textusa

      Delete
  35. "Do not publish" Anonymous at 7 Mar 2018, 09:43:00,

    Please allow the publication of your comment.

    It is very pertinent and quite relevant.

    In the comment authorising us to publish, please mention the content of the comment so we know it's from you.

    Something like "I allow you to publish the comment I submitted saying/asking..."

    Thank you

    ReplyDelete
  36. Hi textusa,I will allow you to publish my comment asking if those places were mentioned at random in walkercan1000 tweets.Didn't know if I was right.Let's see are if the rest of your readers can work it out .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So that it’s clear that we had authorisation to publish a “do not publish” comment, this was what was submitted:

      “Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The paedo offensive":
      Do not publish
      Hi textusa,you said the walkercan1000 account may have tweeted in code.
      can you tell me if he had mentioned France ,Amsterdam ,Egypt ,Usa & Cuba in tweets before? Or have the names of these places been mentioned at random?
      Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 7 Mar 2018, 09:43:00”

      Anonymous 7 Mar 2018, 11:21:00 (09:43:00)

      We have every reason to believe that France, Spain, Amsterdam and Egypt were indeed picked at random.

      And the reason we say this is because Walkercan1000 has mentioned them twice before. When one mentions conferences one has held, one tends to list them chronologically because that’s how the memories of them appear in one’s mind.

      However, with Walkercan1000, the 3 times he tweets about the conferences he’s held, he changes the order. In the first tweet he says “Egypt, Amsterdam, Spain and France”, on the second “Holland, Spain, France and North Africa” and on this latest one “France, Spain, Amsterdam and Egypt”. So very clearly he just randomly picked those 4 locations, to use as an excuse.

      But your questions called to our attention of when did he mentions them:

      https://twitter.com/walkercan1000/status/924962451858296834
      Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
      Following success in Egypt, Amsterdam, Spain and France I'll be lecturing in Florida and, subject to Visa constraints, Havana in Feb/Mar 18.
      4:33 am - 30 Oct 2017

      https://twitter.com/walkercan1000/status/945397119816552448
      Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
      To all the #mccann Trolls wishing violence towards me(U know who you are), I'm stuck in my London Pied-a'-terre this Christmas but following success in Holland, Spain,France and North Africa don't forget to book for my Spring tour of USA and Cuba. Now,who are these presents for?
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DR65j2eWsAExNL3.jpg
      12:53 pm - 25 Dec 2017

      To note, that on his first tweet, he mentions Florida, so Orlando was already on his plans and that then the problems with Cuba were about visas and not political.

      On the Christmas day tweet (yes, the man up to the “Gemma crisis” tweeted 265/7/24) he doesn’t mention any problems regarding Cuba.

      But he does mention being threatened: “To all the #mccann Trolls wishing violence towards me(U know who you are)” which is very similar wording to the ones used on Feb26 “For those wishing violence towards me ( you know who you are, all threats were cached)”

      But most interesting is the date of the first tweet about his forthcoming conference in the US: Oct 30, 2017.

      We recommend that our readers revisit our post “Red Card”. This tweet was sent after a decision was taken to send Nigel Nessling to court, where he was sentenced in November.
      http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2017/12/red-card.html

      This means that this tweet shows very clearly that the decision to shut the Walkercan1000’s twitter account was not because of the “Gemma crisis” but because of what the sentencing of Nigel Nessling represented as we showed on that post.

      We hope that you now see the importance of your question and the reason why we asked you to allow us to publish it.

      Thank you

      Delete
    2. To be very clear about the importance we believe our comment (7 Mar 2018, 12:19:00) above has:

      IF #1:

      - If one believes, as we do, that Walkercan1000’s “Florida conference” tweet are directly linked to his twitter shutdown, temporary or not we don’t know as the future only to the future belongs;

      - If one believes, as we do, that the first of these “Florida conference” tweets that was published on Oct 30 2017 at a time no one publicly knew that Nigel Nessling was to go on trial, long after his house having been raided on April 11 and the Ipswich Star reporting that he had always been cooperative;

      Then the above establishes a clear link between Walkercan1000/Not Textusa/Insane and Nigel Nessling.

      IF #2:

      - If one believes, as we do, that Jim Gamble is linked to the “Troll Dossier” that led to Brenda Leyland’s death;

      - If one believes, as we do, that Nigel Nessling/Vee8 had prior knowledge of that same dossier before it was made public;

      Then the above establishes a clear link between Jim Gamble and Nigel Nessling.

      IF #3:
      - If one believes, as we do, that IF#1 and IF#2 are joined together then all of the above establishes a clear link between Walkercan1000/Not Textusa/Insane, Nigel Nessling and Jim Gamble.

      If one believes in what we do, things couldn’t be clearer.

      If one doesn’t believe in what we do, all of the above is nonsense. Ignore it.

      Delete
    3. About the linking that we have established above (7 Mar 2018, 15:09:00) between Insane-Walkercan1000-Not Textusa/Nessiling/Gamble, we would like to quote ourselves from our post “The reliability of the cadaver dogs” about Insane’s prolonged absence of 563 days:
      http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2018/01/the-reliability-of-cadaver-dogs.html

      “He [Insane] last posted on his blog on May 22 2016, to announce the opening of another of his useless blogs, which we believe didn’t even happen.

      Note that between February and May 2016, when he ‘abandoned’ us, although he didn’t find time to respond to our “Third Option”, he found time to dedicate posts on his other blogs on important subjects such as one on May 21 2016 in which he replies to Sharon Osborne as per our post “The “friend” and the appeal”.

      His last entry was on May 26 2016 in a comment posted on his blog.

      From then on, Not Textusa went into total and absolute hibernation.

      Until he resurfaced last year, on Dec 10, to comment on our blog.

      And why did he come back? Because we had said he was FiremanDave and Michael Walker/Walkercan1000 on Twitter:

      (…)

      Because we said he was on Twitter under different personae, he broke his silence. 563 days of it.

      And he was so upset about it that he even ‘reopened’ his blog to write a post on Dec 11 2017:

      (…)

      And he must have spent Christmas mulling over this because on Jan 5 2018 he insisted on the issue [demanding we remove our comments where we stated he was Walkercan1000] in another post:

      (…)

      Now, it’s important to note, that when he reopened the blog on Dec 11 2016, he started his post with the following words:
      “Hello all, long time no see
      I haven't bothered blogging as, frankly, there wasn't anything worth blogging about.””


      And on that Dec 11 post and on the one that followed (Jan 5 2018) he’s ONLY worried about us saying he was Walkercan1000.

      Walkercan1000 publishes his first “Florida conference” tweet on Oct 30.

      Nigel Nessling was sentenced on Nov 16 so the decision to take him to court we have estimated to have been in the September/October period.

      And Insane decides to reappear on Dec 10, denying, insistently, that he was Walkercan1000.

      Coincidence? We say not.

      But then again, we are only speaking to those who believe in what we believe about our beliefs we have mentioned above.

      For them and for us, the pieces of the puzzle fit nicely and neatly together.

      Delete
  37. It could be a possibility that the place names relate to certain people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 7 Mar 2018, 12:47:00,

      As we said, we believe it was random picking. If it were initials of people or encrypted messages, then there would be a consistent sequencing as we tend to recollect things in the same order.

      And we may be wrong. We are only providing an opinion and have justified why we have it.

      With no other data, it's impossible to come to any different conclusion and all else is guesswork which is something we prefer to keep away from the blog.

      Delete
  38. Unpublished Anonymous at 7 Mar 2018, 13:34:00,

    We are not publishing your comment for the reasons we have given to Anonymous 7 Mar 2018, 12:47:00.

    Hope you understand.

    ReplyDelete
  39. This comment is about Insane’s response to the one we made at 6 Mar 2018, 22:00:00 in which we explained why we thought Maddie’s death by a “protected unknown powerful Britsh paedo” would significantly benefit the swingers who were at Luz, who we believe are those who feel they are to suffer the most with the outing of the truth.

    It’s common place to say that one just wants to drop and leave all and go live in paradise on a tropical island.

    That is probably true (we wish we knew) BUT with an important caveat: said tropical island needs to be connected to the outside world.

    Otherwise, one is simply on deserted island in the middle of the ocean and having only a volleyball to talk to.

    And that is Insane’s problem. When he left Cristobell’s blog in a tantrum because she refused to subscribe to his opinions, he stormed out to go live on his tropical island, his blog.

    And there, he’s speaking to a volleyball. Half a dozen of them of them at best. The visits he gets are more from people interested in seeing how the monkey is playing than to go there to decipher his chatters, gibbers, whoops or screeches.

    Since we published our latest post, he has blogged 10 times now. It’s not a blogging frenzy it’s him being hysterical.

    A frenzy was when he published those 7 posts in his recently created blog accusing Cristobell of protecting paedos

    This is absolutely manic.

    And it can only be for one of 2 reasons. It’s either withdrawal syndrome from abandoning a severe tweeting addiction – to go from a 100 to 0 in tweeting so abruptly is like suddenly stopping smoking when one burns 3 packs a day – or our what we have written in our post and subsequent comments are making him very angry.

    He lives in the delusion that he sets our agenda. He knows for his masters he’s just a minion but fails to understand that he’s one for us as well. He’s just a tool we use. And a very useful tool he’s been for years now, as what originated the post “Reliability of the cadaver dogs” is but one example.

    During this post, we have fully transcribed 3 of his posts. Because it was convenient for us. To show how barren his insults are, how devoid of content his words are and how all covered in rage. But in particular we wanted to highlight his humungous effort in dissociating Not Textusa self from his Walkercan1000 persona.

    We think we achieved that in those 3 transcriptions. Having served his purpose, the uninteresting noises he makes are just that, uninteresting.

    But sometimes he makes an interesting sound. Of the kind that help us towards truth. And when he wants to help, who are we to refuse?

    This time was in reaction to our comment above and of us having said that the British society deemed swingers as “disgusting perverts”.

    This is what he said:

    “So your story now is that the ''disgusting swingers'' make up stories about elite paedos to cover up their swinging in case the neighbours find out ?
    Here is a story from the Daily Mail, a british newspaper
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5467509/Swingers-say-lifestyle-strengthens-relationship.html
    Read the comments. No-one cares”

    And immediately one opens the link and it’s about… a Canadian couple living in Montreal.

    It’s basically an article is about a couple of “Swingers who married after their exes fell in love claim having sex with other people STRENGTHENS their relationship”

    If that was to prove anything, all he had to do was to say so as we believe that we can find hundreds if not thousands of articles in which couples say that the swinging alternative life-style strengthened their love and even saved their marriages.

    (Cont.)

    ReplyDelete
  40. (Cont.)

    It would be really strange for a couple to pursue swinging if swinging diminished their love and ruined their marriage. When that happens, and also there are numerous accounts to that effect, the couple simply stops swinging, at least together

    But we couldn’t care less what a swinger couple thinks about swinging. The view of its social reprehensibility we speak of, comes from outside the couple, and repeating ourselves, from neighbours, business associates, priests, teachers, grocers, butchers, fishmongers, lady at the supermarket, etc, etc.

    And at a certain point in the article this couple even seems to address this question: “Our children and friends are happy for us. We've been together twelve years now and we learn more about each other every time. Life has never been better.”

    Note, children and friends and nothing about remainding community. But let’s give them the benefit of the doubt and say they have no problem in being seen in the street and everyone knowing they are swingers. In fact, as we will explain, they probably relish in it and we can see they have a reason for that.

    In our research we have found that there are 4 kinds of articles on swinging: publicity, scandalous, personal and informative.

    Publicity, is about people running a business directly linked to swinging. Scandalous is when the media wants to make a profit our of swinging, personal are about accounts about the supposed pleasures or displeasures of swinging and informative are the dispassionate ones explaining what it is all about and the rules one has to abide by if one wishes to engage in such activity.

    We only see the picture of the faces of the swingers in the first 2 publicity and scandalous. And when that happens in the last, it is to shame the perverts.

    Swingers’ faces only appear with positive vibes in articles that seek publicity. And then their faces appear a lot. Like in this article.

    It has loads of photos. 7 of the couple plus a video of them sitting on a couch. 2 more of the woman, one of which was “with Laura and Marina from naked news at an event”.

    Only 2 other photos with others appear. One with 2 employees, one of them cannot be recognised and the other one has to make an effort to do be able to do so and they are not swingers and one with another swinger couple. 11 photos and 2 videos and in only one, another swinging couple but who are evidently posing.

    And then we find out that:

    “Carol and David, who works in sales, now host their own relationship advice radio show called 'The Sexy Lifestyle with Carol and David' on VoiceAmerica.com.

    The couple, who married in 2013, are also in talks to produce a feature-length film about swinging.
    David said: 'We love teaching people about different ways they can spice up their sex lives and "live happy, healthy and horny". Not just through swinging but through just having a great relationship.'”

    In other words, they seek publicity. They make money out of swinging. Not only don’t they mind being known as swingers but they wish that to be so.

    We have yet to see a candid photo of a swinger in a media article. Not talking about any nudity but a simple gathering of people assuming to be swingers. Normal Joe and normal Jane with other couples, easily recognisable by all those they meet and greet everyday of their lives with the caption saying, we are here to change partners and have sex with each other.

    If Insane can find such an article, we would be grateful.

    (Cont)

    ReplyDelete
  41. (Cont)

    We, for example, have found this one, https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/567199/Swinger-drowns-James-Bond-sex-party/amp, where a tragedy happened during a swinging party there are pictures with faces and the only people identified are those running the business of holding the swinging parties: “Richard Stanley, 66, runs the business with his partner Janet Harrison, 58, and was the person who rushed to give first aid to the man.”

    Oh, and in the article it says that swingers attending these particular swinging parties are advised to avoid a nearby pub: A notice on their website says: "Please avoid the Red Lion hotel in the village who have let us know they find any association with the hot blooded sexual Olympians who frequent our parties offensive."”

    We also found this one: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2208406/Husband-takes-revenge-teacher-ex-wife-claiming-swinger-caught-dogging.html, where “A vindictive husband launched a campaign of revenge against his teacher ex-wife by falsely claiming she was a swinger and had been caught dogging.”

    And from the outside the UK this one: http://stories.avvo.com/relationships/can-open-relationship-cost-job.html , where the question “Is non-monogamy a legitimate reason for dismissal?” is discussed, meaning that to be known as a swinger could cost one’s job.

    We have in the blog repeatedly mentioned the case of Tommy Sheridan, Scottish politician who sued the extinct New Of The World:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Sheridan

    “Following Sheridan's resignation, the News of the World named him as the MSP they said had had an extramarital affair and visited a swingers' club in Manchester.[18] The party declined to support him in legal action against the paper. He later branded those who refused to support him as "scabs".

    (…)

    The minutes included a discussion by the party's executive committee about a recent article that alleged a married MSP had visited a swingers' club in Manchester. According to the minute, Sheridan admitted that he had in fact visited the club on two occasions, in 1996 and 2002, with close friends. Some of those present at the meeting gave evidence that they had heard Sheridan acknowledge he had been "reckless" in his behaviour which had, with hindsight, been "a mistake" and that "his strategy was to deny the allegations". Sheridan claimed this minute was not accurate.

    Eleven members, including four of the party's MSPs, stated they heard Sheridan admit to visiting the swingers' club at that meeting. Rosemary Byrne MSP and two other members of the executive committee, Graham McIver and Pat Smith, gave evidence that Sheridan made no such statement. The minutes record that Sheridan left the meeting early, but before leaving, "he repeated that he did not believe there was any evidence which would prove him to be lying. He did not accept that he should admit the visits to the club and felt that no-one should comment on private lives".”

    (Cont.)

    ReplyDelete
  42. (Cont.)

    Insane now has time on his hands, and the best he was able to do to show us how the UK is, according to him, supposed not to care, was to find a Canadian couple from Montreal who make money out of swinging.

    Interesting to note that according to Insane’s article, this Canadian couple was initiated in swinging by a… British couple. Who goes unnamed.

    Lastly, as a last ditch of his unshakable and unquestionable reason that supports all his arguments, is when we say “Yes, “disgusting perverts” are words we are using on purpose because that’s what the British society deems swingers to be even though what they do is completely and absolutely legal and between consenting adults” he responds with:

    “No it doesn't. I can say this quite categorically because I am a member of said society, and you're not"

    How can one argue against such substantiated wisdom? One can’t. He got us beat, there. Have to start thinking in packing our bags…

    Such desperation is cringing.

    A last piece of advice to Insane: don’t correct or point out errors other people make in their writings.

    No offense taken but that’s just so Walkercan1000 and you’re not supposed to be him, remember?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brilliant!
      If the man who died in the swinger party (Express article) had died while jogging he would be news and his name and face would be all over the article.
      Why say only he was 35 yrs old? Revealing his identity would be an embarrassment for him and his family!

      Delete
    2. Not sure if you want to publish this, but Insane's response to this made me laugh out loud:
      Textusa claims to know the British psyche. She claims that swingers are regarded by Brits as ''disgusting perverts''. I think this is nonsense. I think the usual response is "Well, it's not for me, but so long as they keep themselves to themselves, I have no problem with it"
      Does he live in the UK???

      Delete
    3. Anonymous 8 Mar 2018, 19:15:00,

      It seems he has lost the plot and is only trying show something to justify his salary and doesn’t even realise that he is contradicting himself.

      He first says the what you quoted and then says this:

      “…and ignoring the fact that British tabloids are awash with salacious stories of people shagging the neighbours just as car parks are awash with people out for a spot of dogging.”

      Which is it?

      Is it the “the usual response is "Well, it's not for me, but so long as they keep themselves to themselves, I have no problem with it"” or is it the fact that “that British tabloids are awash with salacious stories” out of which they make money by selling to people interested in the salacious details of the lives of others?

      It can’t be both.

      A clue. “Tabloid” is a typical British term.

      Delete
  43. Textusa

    I haven't had a chance to read todays comments but wanted to comment on your comment " We have said before, and have said also in the comment mentioned above, that if truth is outed, the news on it will quickly disappear"

    Isn't that just the truth these people have been manipulating the public for 11 years why should it stop now. We had the blatant lies, we had the dogs, we had Martin Brunt's 100% match, we had the digging in PDL, we had the not alive when she left the apartment etc etc etc and still the MSM lied and manipulated the truth and people quickly forgot what they had been told earlier. I wonder do these people who forget easy feel they are doing the child an injustice. I wonder do they think if it was their child would they like people to be as easily swayed and forgetful of what they knew was the truth.

    K

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. K,

      When we say that the news will quickly disappear, we are referring to the time the issue will be kept on the headlines. It will be short and brief.

      It will be, like all current news are, swallowed by the next news cycles, and in these Brexit times we are certain there won't be a shortage of subjects that will very quickly supersede the news about Maddie.

      The people that you say have manipulated the public during 11 years have seen their power significantly eroded. That's why the truth is being outed. Nessling's sentencing was a clear sign of that.

      So the answer to your question, we would say that we believe that it will stop because after 11 years the people who have manipulated (by forcing the government to go along with the lie) have lost their capability to continue to do so.

      If we don't see the outing of the truth, it will mean that we are wrong in our evaluation, and that these people maintained that capability.

      But, it must be said, if it's not worn out now, it will wear out one day. Hiding the truth never solves a problem, only delays it as these 11 years have shown.

      Hope to have answered.

      Delete
  44. The following tweets have come to our attention:

    https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/971694196938723329
    Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
    I must confess that I don't know much about swinging:
    1. Do swingers apply elaborate makeup to 3 yr old girls?
    2. Do swingers discuss the sexual favours offered by 3 yr old girls?
    3. Is their any evidence that GB intelligence have covered up the innocent act of swinging? #McCann
    2:28 AM - 8 Mar 2018

    *******
    https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/971702644745146369
    Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
    4. Did the social worker Yvonne Martin recognize David Payne from a case she worked on that involved swinging?
    5. Was Clement Freud also a swinger? #McCann
    3:02 AM - 8 Mar 2018

    *******
    https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/971726613095346177
    Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
    Replying to @TeddyShepherd @leicspolice @metpoliceuk
    Of course. However, you can't blame decent good-thinking people, even those at TextUSA, for underestimating the sheer scale + scope of the rot in the UK system. #McCann #Savile #CyrilSmith #SpecialBranch #JillDando #Janner #CPS #Hampstead #SamanthaBaldwin #DanielMorgan
    4:37 am - 8 Mar 2018

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1. Do swingers apply elaborate makeup to 3 yr old girls?

      You are obviously speaking about the make-up photo, about which we won’t say any more than we have said, so to this question you can write it off as answered as you wish.

      But what we have already said, is in our opinion enough to come to a conclusion about it: if paedophilia was the secret, would the heavy pro-McCann media publish it in 2010? Only the stupid and unconscious would do that and the media is neither stupid nor unconscious.

      Even if there had been the unthinkable rogue paper who would have leaked it, would the remainder media echo it as it did?

      *******
      2. Do swingers discuss the sexual favours offered by 3 yr old girls?

      You are obviously speaking about the Gaspars statement. We will answer this questions with 4 questions of our own:

      a. As these statements are inserted into the PJ Files in October 2007 after the AFTER BEING REQUESTED by the PJ, from where and when did the Portuguese police have knowledge of the existence of these statements? (please read our post “The Brit Snitch” – http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2016/09/the-brit-snitch.html))

      b. Why did the British police (again we are not talking about stupid and unconscious people) without anyone intervening in the entire UK establishment hierarchy to stop, send these such incriminating statements if paedophilia was THE big secret?

      c. Why did the Gaspars go to the McCanns for a birthday party after having witnessed Gerry “discuss the sexual favours offered by 3 yr old girls”, which happened to be his daughter?
      http://themaddiecasefiles.com/statements-from-the-gaspars-t50.html#p516

      d. Why did Katerina Gaspar meet with the McCanns and the Paynes in a restaurant in U.K. after what she had witnessed?
      http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATERINA-PAYNE-INCIDENT.htm

      *******
      3. Is there any evidence that GB intelligence have covered up the innocent act of swinging?

      First, why use the term “innocent” before you say “act of swinging”? It’s far from being innocent. It is legal but seen by many people as reprehensible and certainly no one finds themselves surprised they are swinging when they expected not to be. One engages after making a conscious decision to do it.

      Then where is there “any evidence that GB intelligence have covered up the act of paedophilia?

      Please don’t reply with CEOP because that agency was supposed to be specialised in online paedophilia and not in a possible case of “offline” paedophilia, as for that there are other specialised police agencies.

      Also, please don’t say the CATS file because the only fact that it presents is that it’s empty. Nothing says that documents were taken away from it, as you probably believe, and nothing says that nothing was put in there, as we believe.

      However, if compromising documents were taken out of it, why wasn’t the CATS file filled with perfectly innocent documents (again we are not talking about stupid and unconscious people)?

      (Cont)

      Delete
    2. (Cont)

      4. Did the social worker Yvonne Martin recognize David Payne from a case she worked on that involved swinging?

      We have dealt with Yvonne Martin in our posts “The Saint of Salem I” (http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2015/09/the-saint-of-salem-i.html) and the “Saint of Salem II” (http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2015/10/the-saint-of-salem-ii.html) and have other posts to write about her which we haven’t written.

      She interacted with the authorities 9 times:

      #1 – When she arrived in Luz and says she approaches a GNR officer to ask directions and is escorted by that GNR officer to near apartment 5A (her initiative approaching officer);
      #2 – When two weeks later she writes an anonymous letter to the British police, finger-pointing Payne (her initiative);
      #3 – When she calls the PJ saying that she wants to speak to them (her initiative and we suppose in JUNE);
      #4 – When she speaks to PJ at her residence – 1st statement (her initiative, in JUNE);
      #5 – When she speaks to PJ at PJ – 2nd statement (the day after her 1st statement);
      #6 – When PJ “archives” both of her statements (she's unaware of this);
      #7 – When PJ “unarchives” her statements (she's unaware of this after receiving the Gaspars statements);
      #8 – When she’s notified to come to PJ to give a statement;
      #9 – When she’s heard for the 3rd statement.

      Only in the last interaction does she say that Payne may be a paedophile. That doesn’t look very strange for a social worker to do?

      If she was scared, why do it? If not scared, why not say it out loud immediately the moment she suspected.

      Yvonne Martin says that it was these words from the PJ that made her think the man the PJ was looking for was Payne:

      “Part 4: The PJ make the first public appeal, 25 May 2007
      Detectives issued a description of a man seen on the night the four-year-old went missing in the resort of Praia Da Luz in the Algarve. Officers said the man was "carrying a child or an object that could have been taken as a child".
      The man is said to be white, aged 35-40, 5ft 10in tall, medium build with hair that was short on top. He was wearing a dark jacket, beige or golden long trousers and dark shoes. At a news conference, Ch Insp Olegario de Sousa urged the man or anyone who had seen him to come forward.”

      Can you please tell us in what way the above said describes in any way David Payne on May 4, from the pictures we have seen of him?

      *******
      5. Was Clement Freud also a swinger?

      He might have been. We have no proof of that but he had an “open marriage”. That doesn’t mean he was swinger but he could hardly disapprove of the practice.
      https://amp.theguardian.com/books/2001/oct/14/biography.features3

      The accusations of paedophilia were mainly made by a 16 yr old girl who slept over alone in the man’s house and took pyjamas with her, so the sleep over was not a surprise.

      We believe he is also accused of abusing a 14 yr old. Not in any way excusing his despicable behaviour, but there are countries in the Western world in which if a girl between 14 and 16 has sex with a partner not more than 2 yrs older than her, it’s not considered paedophilia.

      We are making this point just to say that the attraction for a 14 year old is completely different that the one felt for an infant. The first is the sick and disgusting idea that one is initiating a young woman into womanhood (and under no circumstances a 14 year old should be pressured by an older man because he chooses to believe he’s doing her a favour) while the last is simply an active of violent sadism.

      We believe that you, like us, believe that the McCanns are in on the secret that is being hidden.

      If that secret was paedophilia, and if Clement Freud was in any way involved in Maddie’s death, would Kate include him in her book? Of course not.

      Delete
    3. K9 has replied to our questions, so far with 2 tweets. Tweet #1:

      https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/971903850780164097
      Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
      Let's get the ball rolling on Q1. Here's TextUsa's "answer", which doesn't go anywhere near answering the fundamental question about why adults would apply such makeup to a 3 yr old. It also ignores the fact that the photo was part of a video released by K&G #McCann to the media.
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DXzlTuDW4AAlrlS.jpg:large
      4:21 pm - 8 Mar 2018

      The picture annexed is quoting our blog in the following:
      “Textusa8 Mar 2018, 20:54:00
      1. Do swingers apply elaborate makeup to 3 yr old girls?
      You are obviously speaking about the make-up photo, about which we won’t say any more than we have said, so to this question you can write it off as answered as you wish.
      But what we have already said, is in our opinion enough to come to a conclusion about it: if paedophilia was the secret, would the heavy pro-McCann media publish it in 2010? Only the stupid and unconscious would do that and the media is neither stupid nor unconscious.
      Even if there had been the unthinkable rogue paper who would have leaked it, would the remainder media echo it as it did?”



      We have clearly said we would not answer the question fully, so indeed we didn’t “go anywhere near answering the fundamental question about why adults would apply such makeup to a 3 yr old” because we said we wouldn’t.

      However, this tweet only shows us right on what little we have said about it.

      If the McCanns were in a lawsuit with an insurance company over a burned down house, would they ever publish a video containing images of them playing with a flamethrower inside said house? No, they wouldn’t. That would be a very stupid thing to do.

      Like they wouldn’t put the make-up photo in a video if the big secret being hidden was paedophilia, as they did because it’s a “fact that the photo was part of a video released by K&G”.

      Delete
    4. Tweet #2:

      https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/971906131793711104
      Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
      Some newspapers, like the Independent quoted below, and one so-called CSA expert (MWT) even questioned the wisdom of including such a photo in "a case over which paedophilia casts such an obvious shadow". But why apply the makeup? And where + when was the photo taken? #McCann
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DXznTH8WsAAkuK0.jpg:large
      4:30 pm - 8 Mar 2018

      The image annexed is that of the make-up photo with the following quote next to it:

      “Can the McCanns be thinking straight?
      To keep their story [about Madeleine] alive, they have just released a moody video, complete with a musical soundtrack, which includes a photograph of the three-year-old wearing make-up and gazing into the camera- It is that image which, predictably, has featured in the media. It seems a bizarre and unsettling development. Clearly ... someone should surely have pointed out to them that, in a case over which paedophilia casts an obvious shadow, it looks downright weird when a photograph which has the effect of sexualising the missing child becomes part of the campaign to find her...”

      This answers basically answers begs the following question (our caps):

      If “Clearly ... SOMEONE SHOULD SURELY HAVE POINTED OUT TO THEM that, in a case over which paedophilia casts an obvious shadow, it looks downright weird when a photograph which has the effect of sexualising the missing child becomes part of the campaign to find her...” no one did in the ENTIRE UK ESTABLISHMENT?

      And if that picture had got in by accident in that McCann video out of sheer stupidity, would that sheer stupidity be replicated by the heavy pro-McCann media at the time, if paedophilia was the secret? No, it wouldn’t.

      We will be waiting for further comments on our other 4 answers.

      Delete
    5. https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972089631775784961
      Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
      TextUSA has replied to these tweets without answering the fundamental question. I'm busy this afternoon, but will try to reply over the weekend. In the meantime, have a look at the Jon Corner video that was released by K&G #McCann in May 2010. Pic @ 1.14.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghIWyEdEB00
      4:40 am - 9 Mar 2018

      *******
      K9 is wrong. Picture is not at 1:14.

      It’s from 1:13 to 1:19.

      That’s 6 seconds. No other image in this video lasts that long. It was indeed meant to be seen.

      Delete
    6. https://joana-morais.blogspot.pt/2010/05/mccanns-release-madeleines-lolita-photo.html

      We invite readers to look at the comments and see how the public reacted to the outing of this picture.

      Remember that this was not a leak. This was done by those hiding a huge secret, one that involved the entire UK establishment as we have seen in the Operation Task debrief.

      So, that huge secret was paedophilia (nepiophilia to be precise) and the McCanns went and decided to taunt everyone and all those involved in Operation Task + Nº10 just let them do it and the highly biased media helped them along by echoing this taunt. Does this make ANY sense? To us it doesn’t.

      Delete
    7. And a very interesting tweet exchange about the video K9 published:

      https://twitter.com/TeddyShepherd/status/972094693134782465
      Teddy‏ @TeddyShepherd
      Replying to @K9Truth
      First time I've seen that. Overall, quite bizarre. In parts, given the choice of photo's, more than questionable. In fact it could easily be construed as a not too subtle message to people in high places. #McCann
      5:00 am - 9 Mar 2018

      https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972099461005627397
      Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
      Replying to @TeddyShepherd
      Yup, there are so many questionable images in that video that you have to doubt the agenda or mental health of both Jon Corner + the people who approved its release (K&G #McCann, Clarence Mitchell + Lord knows who else).
      5:19 am - 9 Mar 2018

      https://twitter.com/TeddyShepherd/status/972105072955068416
      @TeddyShepherd
      Replying to @K9Truth
      I think we could question the mental health of a lot of people, on both sides of the divide. But none more so than the #McCann's photo op's. Never ever have I seen anything like them, or such a lack of self awareness in any one person, let alone two. Staggering!
      5:41 am - 9 Mar 2018

      https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972110138999037952
      Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
      Replying to @TeddyShepherd
      Indeed. However, instead of rambling into endless speculation about the motives/reasons for releasing it, I would prefer to focus on the core question of why any parents would take such a sick photo of their 3 yr old at an undisclosed date and at an undisclosed location. #McCann
      6:01 am - 9 Mar 2018

      Teddy‏ @TeddyShepherd
      Replying to @K9Truth
      Indeed indeed. The make up and the pose were far from accidental. One cannot help but wonder what the purpose of the photograph was prior to its questionable release. It's hardly normal is it? #McCann
      6:09 am - 9 Mar 2018

      Delete
    8. Basically, K9 defends that “instead of rambling into endless speculation about the motives/reasons for releasing it” it’s preferable to go on an “rambling into endless speculation about (…) why any parents would take such a sick photo of their 3 yr old at an undisclosed date and at an undisclosed location” that reeks of paedophilia when paedophilia is what is supposed to be being hidden.

      Delete
    9. And when things start to get too close for comfort, nothing like a timely distraction:

      https://twitter.com/2for1Tickets/status/972114689672073216
      aleksandr orlov‏ @2for1Tickets
      Replying to @K9Truth @TeddyShepherd
      I'd heard the 'Lolita' pic derived from a Corner vid - but I've never seen this, either. Why the zoom in on Kate's arse? Or was it a nod towards the cadaver pants? Either way, it must have taken ages to find #mccann looking busy, ringing the banks, SKY, Mitchell, etc..
      6:19 am - 9 Mar 2018

      Delete
    10. Teddy posted this tweet which we have transcribed above:
      https://twitter.com/TeddyShepherd/status/972112106303696896

      To it, K9 replied the following:

      https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972147254424416256
      Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
      Replying to @TeddyShepherd
      I agree. It seems that some are suggesting that K&G created a stomach-turning photo of their 3 yr old daughter in an Ovendesque pose in a devious attempt to distract from the real heinous truth at the heart of the case - swinging. Ummm, I don't quite get it. #McCann
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DX3CxT7WkAICOw6.jpg:large
      8:29 am - 9 Mar 2018


      One correction, swinging is not heinous. Some people may not like it and some other may even consider that if falls below the minimum moral levels a human being should have but from there to being heinous goes a long distance.

      We do not defend or condemn swinging but one thing we don’t do is insult the options made by free-thinking, able and consenting adults.

      We also doubt very much that K&G created that photo. We have strong reasons to believe who did but will keep that to ourselves.

      Sometimes one is so accurately true without realising it.

      We agree FULLY with the description made by K9 about the make-up photo: it IS “a stomach-turning photo of their 3 yr old daughter in an Ovendesque pose”.

      To be, in our opinion absolutely correct, we would rephrase the above into the following:

      “It seems that some are suggesting that it was created a stomach-turning photo of the 3 yr old Maddie in an Ovendesque pose in a devious attempt to warn government that it should leave alone the real truth at the heart of the case - swinging.”

      We do not believe that the intent when releasing it for the government to see, was to create an Ovendesque product. That, we believe, happened by accident and indeed is what it ended up being, as we already agreed.

      The photo annexed to this tweet is not of Maddie. But of another girl. That raises an interesting question to both the pros and the anti die-hard paedo theory subscribers.

      To the pros, why is it that there is only ONE photo of Maddie playing with make-up. It would appear that she was a girl prone to play with other things, and as there are no smudges we imagine she had done this before and probably after. Why no other pictures?

      To the anti die-hard paedo theory subscribers, same question: why only ONE photo? It seems the paedo(s) who took this photo had no shame and had confidence to make this one public, why not continue to taunt us all with others? Or was this a ONE photo session only?

      Delete
    11. K9 has replied to our comment above with the following tweet:

      https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972192672134959105
      Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
      Canine Truth Retweeted Canine Truth
      Needless to say, "heinous" was intended to be ironic.
      IMHO, swinging is far too banal + innocent an activity to trigger the mobilisation of the apparatus of the state against the PJ.
      Do the swinging theorists believe the photo was staged/photoshopped purely to distract?#McCann
      Canine Truth added,
      https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972147254424416256
      1:29 am - 9 Mar 2018

      It seems no matter how much we use the word “warn”, K9 insists on saying that we say “distract”.

      To be very clear, and if K9 wishes to use a word that starts with a “d”, then we will say that the make-up photo was used in an attempt to DIVERT the government from engaging in a review of the Maddie case outside their terms, or to be specific, out of the control of their man, Jim Gamble.

      The video was released in May 2010 and Theresa May would become Home Secretary later that month.

      According to Gamble himself, in Bilton’s BBC Panorama – Madeleine, 10 Years On, Theresa May ignored him totally when it came to the Maddie case.

      It seems someone was right, in early May (when said photo was released as per K9’s video), to believe that Jim Gamble was about to be unburdened of all his responsibilities in the Maddie case and that a forthcoming review of the case would best not take place.

      We, at the blog – and we can only speak for ourselves – believe indeed “the photo was staged/photoshopped”.

      If it was, as we believe, then one thing is certain: it was not staged/photoshoped to protect a secret of paedophilia.

      It would have to be to protect ANY other secret BUT that of a paedophilia one as that picture has drawn attention to paedophilia in the Maddie case as we all have witnessed since it was first revealed.

      About swinging being “far too banal + innocent an activity to trigger the mobilisation of the apparatus of the state against the PJ”, we have responded to that in our long comment at 8 Mar 2018, 09:03:00.

      Delete
    12. https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972249637481537541
      Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
      All is clear, at last,
      TextUSA believes the makeup photo was staged/photoshopped to pressurize the government into establishing the right sort of review + to hide a secret about swinging.
      Any difference of opinion should be welcomed + respected. A good weekend to all. #McCann
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DX4f4FdWAAUfC7V.jpg:large
      3:15 pm - 9 Mar 2018

      Delete
  45. From K9:

    https://twitter.com/TeddyShepherd/status/972526458383077376
    Teddy‏ @TeddyShepherd
    Teddy Retweeted Canine Truth
    I don't have the words. I think it may be something to do with the despair I feel. #McCann
    Teddy added,
    https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972249637481537541
    9:35 am - 10 Mar 2018

    https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972530983546376193
    Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
    Replying to @TeddyShepherd
    You should've seen the obstinacy with which they ignored the stench of paedophilia from the makeup photo, Gaspar Statements + Yvonne Martin's statements/letter. Truly worthy of on-message pros, although a more charitable excuse would be naivety + ignorance of GB history. #McCann
    9:53 am - 10 Mar 2018

    ******
    We have addressed all the 5 questions K9 has put.

    Even if in one, about the make-up photo, we have not, by option, fully addressed it and will accept that s/he write it off as unanswered.

    However, as can be seen, we have presented above our arguments, transparently, about said photo. The readers can read both our and his arguments and make up their own minds about them.

    The debate ended with K9 saying “Any difference of opinion should be welcomed + respected” which is contradicted in the tweet above with him qualifying our arguments as “Truly worthy of on-message pros”.

    We are waiting for K9 to say where we are wrong in the other 4 questions he raised.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Again, K9 misleads, which is becoming indeed interesting:

    “https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972799071382638592

    cherry berry‏ @cosyring
    swinging could well come into play but sadly links show a lot more involved than that :(

    Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
    Replying to @cosyring
    I agree. I was referring to my ongoing discussion with the TextUSA blog that believes that paedophilia is a cover for swinging + that the release of the makeup photo was a strategic attempt to pressurize the govt into appointing Gamble as head of Op Grange. It's bonkers! #McCann
    4:39 am - 11 Mar 2018”

    We have never said it was to pressure appointing Gamble as head of Operation Grange. Gamble is quoted by a newspaper article saying that it was Colin Sutton who would head a forthcoming review on the Maddie case.

    When the Jon Corner video was put out, Gamble was already minced meat as events according to the man himself have shown.

    We will again try to be very clear, using only a few words: the make-up picture was to tell government to lay-off Maddie.

    Hope that is now clear.

    One has to wonder why so much misleading on K9’s part. No, one doesn’t. One just has to read his tweets and who he interacts with. But we’ll get back to that later.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. K9 published this tweet and has deleted it:

      Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth 4m4 minutes ago
      More
      Replying to @K9Truth @cosyring
      I may have misunderstood TextUSA. Her claim is that the release of the makeup photo was intended to pressurize the govt into allowing Gamble to "control", and not necessarily to head, the review that later turned into Operation Grange. #McCann
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYAcAKgWkAAp9OM.jpg:large


      Then he has since published this:

      https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972808316341583872

      Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
      FollowFollow @K9Truth
      More
      Replying to @K9Truth @cosyring
      I may have misunderstood/misrepresented TextUSA. Her claim is that the release of the makeup photo was intended to pressurize the govt into allowing Gamble to "control", and not necessarily to head, the review that later turned into Operation Grange. #McCann
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYAcAKgWkAAp9OM.jpg:large
      5:15 am - 11 Mar 2018

      The difference is the word “misrepresented” which we will get back to.

      The image annexed is both the same in the deleted tweet as in this one. It’s quoting us in our comment Textusa9 Mar 2018, 21:06:00:
      “It seems no matter how much we use the word “warn”, K9 insists on saying that we say “distract”.
      To be very clear, and if K9 wishes to use a word that starts with a “d”, then we will say that the make-up photo was used in an attempt to DIVERT the government from engaging in a review of the Maddie case outside their terms, or to be specific, out of the control of their man, Jim Gamble.”

      Note, this is evidently after we published the comment above. And again he tries to mislead

      It seems that K9 is unable to understand the following phrase: “: the make-up picture was to tell government to lay-off Maddie”.

      We see no Gamble in it,

      As it seems K9 is have some problem in understanding us, let us break this down like we would to a six-year old:

      - There was this man called Gamble who was going to a review about the case of a little girl who disappeared;

      - This man Gamble would control that review control by putting a friend of his, Sutton, in charge of it;

      - The people who really, really wanted Gamble to control that review realised that a lady, Theresa May would soon come into a position she could and would determine who would control that review;

      - The people who really, really wanted Gamble to control that review realised that Theresa May was going to say that Gamble was not going to control that review;

      - The people who really, really wanted Gamble to control that review realised that it was best to have no review than to have one that was not controlled by Gamble;

      - The people who really, really wanted Gamble to control that review put out a picture of Maddie, properly changed but with what was needed to be seen there, to try to convince Theresa May not to hold a review at all and leave the case alone.

      Hope, now it’s clear.

      About representing or misrepresenting us, we can only hope K9 has the common decency of not using our work in any way to substantiate any of his opinions.

      Delete
    2. https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972842774201618433
      Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
      Indeed, I have problems understanding TextUSA's theories, even her simplified version. Why would K&G create a photo that reeks of paedophilia to pressurize the government, if, as TextUSA claims, paedophilia plays no role in the case? Who exactly is being threatened? #McCann
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYA7QgXXkAAxkLV.jpg:large
      7:32 am - 11 Mar 2018
      *****

      Interesting. K9 seems to have read, understood our blood and DNA post but struggles to understand even the simplest breakdown.

      Who exactly is being threatened?
      How are they being threatened?
      In what way does the picture threaten them?
      Are all question we won’t answer because we don’t want to. As we said in the beginning, when we answered k9’s FIVE questions (we still have to hear from him about our answers to the other 4) we said we wouldn’t answer fully the question about the photo.

      In any case, we have strong reasons to believe K9 knows the answers to all these questions.

      Delete
    3. https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972867670294061056
      Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
      FollowFollow @K9Truth
      More
      While I'm flattered by TextUSA's attention + grateful for the exposure she gives my tweets, I must confess that I still don't have a clue what she's on about. I hope her followers can follow her, but I'm completely lost by her gnomic pronouncements. #McCann
      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYBR-CeWsAIiNfD.jpg:large
      9:11 am - 11 Mar 2018

      Delete
    4. Interesting comment from K9:

      "Why would K&G create a photo that reeks of paedophilia to pressurize the government, if, as TextUSA claims, paedophilia plays no role in the case?"

      But it makes absolute sense for K&G to create a photo that reeks of paedophilia and include it in a video when the secret to hide is paedophilia?

      Go figure.

      Delete
  47. https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972794602460733441
    Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
    Replying to @cosyring
    Clearly another diversion from the sordid swinging that apparently lies at the heart of this case. TextUSA and the Spade would probably argue that this was a fake conviction or that Nessling's downloading/creation of 40,000 obscene CSA images was an elaborate distraction. #McCann
    4:21 am - 11 Mar 2018
    *****

    So K9 knows what our opinion is about how Nigel Nessling relates to the Maddie case, we wrote in our post the “Red Card”.
    http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2017/12/red-card.html

    ReplyDelete
  48. And after 12 days, 15 hours and 17 minutes Walkercan1000 has returned:

    https://twitter.com/walkercan1000/status/972898488701915136
    Michael Walker‏ @walkercan1000
    Replying to @Colin_Lawton1 @McCannCaseTweet
    Unlike you, St Colin of Healed Up Arseholes. XXX #mccann
    11:14 am - 11 Mar 2018

    Nothing about Cuba, nothing about success, nothing about restaurants in the US.

    He returns and picks a fight with a @Colin_Lawton1.

    All so transparent that it is really cringing.

    For some reason we prefer to put this comment here, where it fits nicely, rather than in our most recent post, where it would be totally out of place.

    ReplyDelete
  49. https://twitter.com/K9Truth/status/972954854233726977
    Canine Truth‏ @K9Truth
    Replying to @zodiaczephyr @Cerb32 and 4 others
    I suspect none of us are sufficiently qualified to offer an accurate assessment of the sort of mental condition that lies behind this sentence, the release of the makeup photo, the decision to play tennis days after the disappearance + various other bizarre statements. #McCann
    2:58 pm - 11 Mar 2018

    *****
    In the tweet above “this sentence” refers to the words used by Kate in her book about Maddie’s genitals being torn apart, which all those interested in the case are familiar with.

    K9 basically is saying those words are the same as the release of the make-up photo: if the secret was paedophilia, then why would Kate refer to Maddie’s genitals in the book?

    Making a comparison with what we wrote above: “But it makes absolute sense for K&G to create a photo that reeks of paedophilia and include it in a video when the secret to hide is paedophilia?”

    K9 forgets that when Kate refers in her book to that kind of paedophilia, she’s referring to a “common abductor”. A low-life piece of scum who is supposedly raping her child.

    One, who we don’t think the British establishment would be protecting within the “the sheer scale + scope of the rot in the UK system.”

    Comparing what is not comparable and pretend that it is, is deceit.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Hi Textusa - please can you share your thoughts on where, when and who took the make-up photograph of Madeleine? The photograph looks to me as if it's been photo-shopped in more than a couple of places - what are your views on it, please? Like you, I don't see it as evidence of paedophilia but rather as some sort of a warning message to all those involved in Maddie's death and the cover-up. If this is something you have previously covered, I would be grateful if you would point me to where I can read it. Many thanks. Wistle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wistle,

      We apologise but all we want to say, for now, about that photo we have said in the comments to this post in the debate we had with K9.

      We agree with you that it is "a warning message to all those involved in Maddie's death and the cover-up". Why, we prefer to keep to ourselves.

      Apologies and hope you understand.

      Delete
    2. Hi again - I do understand and respect your decision to do so. Kind regards. Wistle.

      Delete

Comments are moderated.

Comments are welcomed, but its reserved the right to delete comments deemed as spam, transparent attempts to get traffic without providing any useful commentary, and any contributions which are offensive or inappropriate for civilized discourse.

Textusa