tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post8951083792792721727..comments2023-10-30T07:28:35.018+00:00Comments on Textusa: CarmanTextusahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comBlogger68125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-58682932690468228202016-02-05T13:19:23.733+00:002016-02-05T13:19:23.733+00:00Anon 18.07,it's only "Mistaken Identity&q...Anon 18.07,it's only "Mistaken Identity" when you need to mask the real one, who stated he was Mr John Geraherty to the press,public persona?<br />Now people have been able to identify the resemblance of a person,"Staring at Gerry McCann", who was hot stepping it back to the UK with Kate and family 8/9 September 2007,Renault Scenic and close associations to a Portugal Golf course Captain, we are able to digest,why they wished for his identity to be secret?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-14212428085273276352016-02-04T22:21:32.798+00:002016-02-04T22:21:32.798+00:00Not Textusa 4 Feb 2016, 13:36:00 and 13:42:00
Who...Not Textusa 4 Feb 2016, 13:36:00 and 13:42:00<br /><br />Who cares where his statement is? We know it EXISTS just like we know Stephen Carpenter's first statement EXISTS even though it's not in the files. <br /><br />As for this:<br /><br /><i>"A situation was investigated relating to two individuals, Neil B. and Rajinder B., especially as regards the former, whose information was crossed with Tasmin Silence’s witness account, the photofit showing that this was not the same individual. In spite of the inquiries made, including by means of the Letter of Request, nothing was found to link him to the disappearance of the British girl.''</i><br /><br />We know all that, Neil Berry was investigated because he was positively identified by Mario Marreiros as the man lurking in the stairwell of block 5, so that's nothing new.<br /><br />As for the PJ ruling him out, of course he was ruled out, Neil Berry wasn't involved in the disappearance of Maddie McCann. No, Neil Berry was lurking in the stairwell of block 5 looking like he got caught with his fingers in the sweetie jar because he was involved in the SWINGING.<br /><br />And that had to be covered up at all costs. <br /><br />NualaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-14944185953275661752016-02-04T13:42:32.125+00:002016-02-04T13:42:32.125+00:00Oh, incidentally:
"A situation was investiga...Oh, incidentally:<br /><br />"A situation was investigated relating to two individuals, Neil B. and Rajinder B., especially as regards the former, whose information was crossed with Tasmin Silence’s witness account, the photofit showing that this was not the same individual. In spite of the inquiries made, including by means of the Letter of Request, nothing was found to link him to the disappearance of the British girl.''<br /><br />So the PJ ruled him out. But of course, you know better than them....<br />http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post245356.html#p245356Not Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17268234937980889735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-56521166604351141192016-02-04T13:36:37.063+00:002016-02-04T13:36:37.063+00:00So if he spoke to the police several months after ...So if he spoke to the police several months after Madeleine went missing, where is his statement?<br /><br />Why don't you come back when you have something other than a tabloid newspaper to quote from, hmmm?Not Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17268234937980889735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-90546255850532456342016-02-03T20:58:51.139+00:002016-02-03T20:58:51.139+00:00Anonymous 2 Feb 2016, 23:30:00
That's a very ...Anonymous 2 Feb 2016, 23:30:00<br /><br />That's a very good question, however I believe I've shown in my last post that it was indeed Mario Marreiros.<br /><br />Mario Marreiros himself says it was him, he had no problem telling the newspapers it was him who saw someone lurking in the stairwell of block 5, he even described the person to the newspaper.<br /><br />So we await Not Textusa's response to your question and my last post. I'm greatly looking forward to him showing everyone that I've been talking nonsense as he claims :)<br /><br />NualaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-73660013456277843622016-02-03T18:07:37.668+00:002016-02-03T18:07:37.668+00:00I see you've been very busy responding to Insa...I see you've been very busy responding to Insane on your blog.<br />How wonderful it is to see him so silenced by both yourself and Nuala. Both so very incisive.<br />Glad to see that in future you're going to be censoring his referrals to 'conspiracy' <br />What a strange character Geraghty is, mysterious and elusive, nothing seemed to add up, so glad you have managed to reveal the discrepancies <br />Why has no one ever felt the need to correct the case of a mistaken identity?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-67608069200844838792016-02-03T17:42:54.248+00:002016-02-03T17:42:54.248+00:00https://mobile.twitter.com/AdirenM/status/69464948...https://mobile.twitter.com/AdirenM/status/694649483913793536<br /><br />"Walker must be a twin of GreenInk Wright, because their hired dementia is= #McCann"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-17571425048253162822016-02-02T23:30:34.687+00:002016-02-02T23:30:34.687+00:00Not Textusa,
I'm curious to know who do you t...Not Textusa,<br /><br />I'm curious to know who do you think was the witness mentioned by the PJ in this sentence from the files when questioning N Berry "Considering the fact that you were seen by a witness, clarify what you were doing at that time next to the stairs leading to the upper floor". If not Mario Marreiros, who?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-4435374919694862572016-02-02T20:39:50.900+00:002016-02-02T20:39:50.900+00:00Interesting debate.Interesting debate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-71307563126091327992016-02-02T19:41:53.995+00:002016-02-02T19:41:53.995+00:00Not Textusa 2 Feb 2016, 18:14:00
Here is the arti...Not Textusa 2 Feb 2016, 18:14:00<br /><br />Here is the article confirming Mario Marreiros identified Neil Berry as the man lurking in the stairwell of block 5 on the evening Maddie disappeared:<br /><br />http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/madeleine-mccann-witness-saw-weird-1918572<br /><br />In the article Mario Marreiros says he "identified a potential suspect to Portuguese police a few months after Madeleine went missing. He spent hours with an officer looking at pictures and videos." Mario Marreiros identified the man from pictures and videos, and here is the man:<br /><br />http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/NeilBerry1.jpg<br /><br />That's the man who Mario Marreiros said “had a really fat face and had two-tone sunglasses on, they got lighter at the bottom and were big" and had "lots of hair, close to his head — like it was glued. It was straight hair. He was about my age now — 45, 46.”<br /><br />That man is Neil Berry, and should there be any doubt about it, note the article says this "according to Portuguese files, officers asked British police to put more questions to this man – a full year after Madeleine vanished."<br /><br />And indeed they did, and the man they put those questions to was NEIL BERRY:<br /><br /><i>"Considering the fact that you were seen by a witness, clarify what you were doing at that time next to the stairs leading to the upper floor , which are located next to the lift of Block 5 at the Ocean Club, i.e. not far from the apartment from where Madeleine McCann went missing ?<br /><br />On that occasion, did you actually pass by an Ocean Club employee that went there to pick up laundry ?"</i><br /><br />Neil Berry was POSITIVELY IDENTIFIED by Mario Marreiros (from photos and videos) as the man lurking in the stairwell of block 5 and when Neil Berry was asked by the PJ what he was doing there, he denied being there at all. He LIED.<br /><br />As for the rest, If it's nonsense then it would be easy to show that it was nonsense wouldn't it. And yet . . . . nothing.<br /><br />NualaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-56624174185912552392016-02-02T18:14:14.376+00:002016-02-02T18:14:14.376+00:00Nuala, as I said, if you think he identified Neil ...Nuala, as I said, if you think he identified Neil Berry, please provide a statement where he does so.<br /><br />As for the rest, you are merely repeating nonsense over and overNot Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17268234937980889735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-82203343668403865832016-02-02T17:32:59.013+00:002016-02-02T17:32:59.013+00:00Not Textusa 1 Feb 2016, 23:11:00
Neil Berry lied,...Not Textusa 1 Feb 2016, 23:11:00<br /><br />Neil Berry lied, he denied being in the stairwell of block 5 early evening on the day Maddie disappeared even though he WAS there. The laundryman Mario Marreiros saw him and identified him to the PJ.<br /><br />As for Stephen Carpenter, this is from his statement:<br /><br /><i>DCF: Its in the part where it mentions that there was a van, and says that it was parked at the back of Robert Murat'' garden, and that you never saw anyone use the van, but you remember that it had something to do with the cleaning staff.<br /><br />SC: Yes, to transport the bedlinen and towels.<br /><br />DCF: Yes. It says here that you never saw anyone drive it, you just know that you saw it parked, did you ever notice that it was missing or do you remember always seeing it there'<br /><br />SC:Humm, no...no it was not always there, I saw it about two or three times.</i><br /><br />So Stephen Carpenter said he saw the van "about two or three times" and it's clear that in his previous statement (the one he was clarifying, which DC Ferguson is reading out to him) that he NEVER saw anyone use the van "you never saw anyone use the van" and he NEVER saw anyone drive the van "It says here that you never saw anyone drive it". Stephen Carpenter also said this:<br /><br /><i>"the van was parked there, I never saw anyone and more than once assumed that it would be cleaning staff and only this thought coincided with the presence of the man from the laundry, and if there were any reply to be made in relation to the link between the van parked there and the laundry man."</i><br /><br />He NEVER saw anyone "I never saw anyone" but despite never seeing anyone use the van, or drive the van, and despite saying that in fact he NEVER saw ANYONE at all anywhere near the van he "assumed" the van was used by the laundry man. Utter tosh, and a clear attempt at implicating Mario Marreiros in the abduction of Maddie. And why would be want to do that? Because Mario Marreiros positively identified Neil Berry as the man lurking in the stairwell of block 5 looking like he got caught with his hand in the sweetie jar, and so Mario Marreiros HAD to be discredited. But unfortunately for Stephen Carpenter he was so bad at doing the task he was required to do that his LIES jump out from the page.<br /><br />As regards the garage, it doesn't exist. There are no garages in the area where Stephen Carpenter said they searched, and in fact what the poor unfortunate Mr Carpenter didn't know when he made up this fictional garage is that there are barely ANY garages at all in PdL.<br /><br />NualaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-86366120201883965702016-02-01T23:11:00.676+00:002016-02-01T23:11:00.676+00:00Nowhere in Marreiros' statement did he identif...Nowhere in Marreiros' statement did he identify Neil Berry as the man he saw<br /><br />He police are free to put statements to people they question such as ''You were seen...'' without them necessarily being true<br /><br />If you think He identified Neil Berry, by all means provide a statement in which he does so.<br /><br />If you cannot provide such a statement, which you can't, it automatically follows that you cannot state that Neil Berry lied.<br /><br />Stephen Carpenter did not lie. He clarified a previous statement to which we do not have access, and appears to connect the laundryman with the van. As far the garage, how would you know?<br />Not Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17268234937980889735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-58604393591823807952016-02-01T23:07:19.631+00:002016-02-01T23:07:19.631+00:00Nuala, that silenced Not Textusa. Not surprised
:)...Nuala, that silenced Not Textusa. Not surprised<br />:)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-46485373504787032312016-02-01T19:22:33.166+00:002016-02-01T19:22:33.166+00:00It's always an indication you've done a go...It's always an indication you've done a good job when Not Textusa gets this worked up! Well done sisters!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-66597259831335701502016-02-01T18:10:29.553+00:002016-02-01T18:10:29.553+00:00Not Textusa 31 Jan 2016, 23:12:00
I never make an...Not Textusa 31 Jan 2016, 23:12:00<br /><br />I never make anything up, I don't need to. <br /><br />Mario Marreiros DID identify Neil Berry as being the man lurking in the stairwell of block 5 early evening on the day Maddie disappeared. This is what the PJ said to Neil Berry:<br /><br />"Considering the fact that you were seen by a witness, clarify what you were doing at that time next to the stairs leading to the upper floor, which are located next to the lift of Block 5 at the Ocean Club, i.e. not far from the apartment from where Madeleine McCann went missing?"<br /><br />The PJ didn't ask Neil Berry if he was in the stairwell, they TOLD HIM he was in the stairwell of block 5. He was positively identified by Mario Marreiros as being the man lurking in the stairwell of block 5. But he denied it, so he lied to the police. Neil Berry said:<br /><br />"I was not in block 5"<br /><br />It's in this paragraph here:<br /><br />"I am not certain where I was at 18.00. It is possible that I was already in my apartment or returning from the bar. In order to arrive at my apartment I would walk along the side of the pool, crossing the stairs of block 4. If I were with someone, this person would be Raj, but as I have already said I do not remember whether I returned with him or before him. I do not remember having seen a lift in any of the apartment blocks. <i>I was not in block 5,</i> but had to pass by it in order to arrive at my apartment. It is possible that I was on the other side of the street opposite block five."<br /><br />As regards Stephen Carpenter, if he saw a van but never looked in the van, never saw anyone near the van, never saw anyone in the van, never saw anyone drive the van, then he didn't know who used it. He saw NO-ONE, that's what he said and YET Stephen Carpenter told the police the van belonged to the laundryman and was used to carry the bed linen. So he lied as well.<br /><br />As for the garage he claims he went into which had a bed and children's toys, it doesn't exist.<br /><br />NualaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-65216536704693281982016-02-01T13:10:03.759+00:002016-02-01T13:10:03.759+00:00The article is regarding the accuracy of LCDNA Tes...The article is regarding the accuracy of LCDNA Testing methods by the FSS . Not the accuracy of the dogs. There were several problems with the FSS and with LC-DNA methods . In fact LCDNA evidence was suspended for a while after this case until correct methods were put in place. Namely by the FSS which, according to police reports, was using an incorrect method to perform them. <br /><br />In 2007 A joint statement issued by the Home Office and Acpo said: "Towards the end of 2006 we become aware that a small percentage of DNA samples may need to be re- examined as a result of differences in the way forensic suppliers were using new techniques to analyse forensic material between 2000 and 2005. This is now referring to the use by the FSS of the non recommended LCDNA technique “The review relates to cases where the FSS analysed tiny samples of blood or saliva for a DNA profile, only to get a negative result when detectives had expected otherwise.“ DNA evidence became traceable in very small traces of bodily fluids from 2000 following advances in testing techniques."<br /><br />http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6381969.stmAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-37556122602963701482016-02-01T01:22:16.542+00:002016-02-01T01:22:16.542+00:00The article on the meeting was clearly an attempt ...The article on the meeting was clearly an attempt to possibly use this 'expert' in case any sniffer dog alerts were eventually used in court! Seems obvious....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-6062863333545864492016-01-31T23:18:32.277+00:002016-01-31T23:18:32.277+00:00Censored comment received from Insane:
"Not ...Censored comment received from Insane:<br /><br />"Not Textusa has left a new comment on your post "Carman":<br /><br />You can't even make stuff up convincingly, can you?<br /><br />This is what Neil Berry said<br /><br />"With regard to where I was at 18.00, whom I was with and the fact that I was seen by a witness at this time next to stairs and lift of block 5 of the Ocean Club:<br />I am not certain where I was at 18.00. It is possible that I was already in my apartment or returning from the bar. In order to arrive at my apartment I would walk along the side of the pool, crossing the stairs of block 4. If I were with someone, this person would be Raj, but as I have already said I do not remember whether I returned with him or before him. I do not remember having seen a lift in any of the apartment blocks. I was not in block 5, but had to pass by it in order to arrive at my apartment. It is possible that I was on the other side of the street opposite block five.<br /><br />With relation to one of the Ocean Club employees having passed close by:<br />I do not remember having seen Ocean Club staff collecting dirty laundry at this hour.''<br /><br />Nowhere does he say he wasn't there. He says he can't remember where he was, nor does he remember seeing anyone collecting laundry.<br /><br />Mario Marreiros did not identify Neil Berry<br /><br />I really do not know where you are getting the stuff about Stephen Carpenter from because it's perfectly clear from his statement; (censored).<br /><br />There is no indication whatsoever that either of these witnesses lied<br /><br />Posted by Not Textusa to Textusa at 31 Jan 2016, 23:12:00"Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-71363737428668158842016-01-31T23:06:31.496+00:002016-01-31T23:06:31.496+00:00Dearly me not Textusa we are sinking to new lows n...Dearly me not Textusa we are sinking to new lows now. Would the mccanns even sink low enough to use this guy Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-28102060663642999102016-01-31T22:56:06.717+00:002016-01-31T22:56:06.717+00:00In the words of the song, "You say it best, w...In the words of the song, "You say it best, when you say nothing at all"Not Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17268234937980889735noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-79487340521657656822016-01-31T22:44:51.836+00:002016-01-31T22:44:51.836+00:00Not Textusa 31 Jan 2016, 13:48:00
We KNOW some of...Not Textusa 31 Jan 2016, 13:48:00<br /><br />We KNOW some of the holidaymakers lied because it's in the PJ files. Neil Berry, for example, was positively identified as being seen lurking in the stairwell of block 5 early in the evening on the day Maddie disappeared. This is the question the PJ asked Neil Berry:<br /><br />"Considering the fact that you were seen by a witness, clarify what you were doing at that time next to the stairs leading to the upper floor, which are located next to the lift of Block 5 at the Ocean Club, i.e. not far from the apartment from where Madeleine McCann went missing?"<br /><br />The PJ didn't ask Neil Berry if he was in the stairwell, they TOLD HIM he was in the stairwell of block 5. And what he was doing there when the laundryman Mario Marreiros saw him looking like he'd got caught with his fingers in the sweetie jar had nothing to do with the disappearance of Maddie, he was there for other reasons, and whatever those reasons were he wasn't happy he'd been seen. Because he lied to the police and denied ever being there.<br /><br />And so what was important then was trying to discredit the laundryman Mario Marreiros and Stephen Carpenter was given that job. Stephen Carpenter told the police he'd seen a white van near his apartment in PdL. He said he'd never looked in the van, he'd never seen anyone near the van, he'd never seen anyone in the van, he'd never seen anyone drive the van. In fact he told the police absolutely NO-ONE had been near this white van at all and YET Stephen Carpenter told the police the van belonged to the laundryman and was used to carry the bed linen. Not only that, this laundryman he'd never seen also had a garage in PdL in which there was a bed and children's toys. That's what Stephen Carpenter told the police in his statement.<br /><br />A clear attempt to implicate Mario Marreiros in the abduction of Maddie because Mario Marreiros identified the man he saw lurking in the stairwell of block 5 as Neil Berry.<br /><br />All this is FACT, it's in the PJ files.<br /><br />http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/NEIL_BERRY.htm<br /><br />http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/STEPHEN-CARPENTER.htm<br /><br />NualaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-19875411743976504652016-01-31T22:26:09.415+00:002016-01-31T22:26:09.415+00:00http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1573193/Oma...http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1573193/Omagh-bombing-Sean-Hoey-found-not-guilty.html<br /><br />He was found not guilty so presumably Mcs would have used this case IF they could.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-2785756098824153432016-01-31T22:05:45.673+00:002016-01-31T22:05:45.673+00:00We have amply answered.We have amply answered.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-10095531919490226712016-01-31T21:59:32.731+00:002016-01-31T21:59:32.731+00:00Fact, a man who isn't John Geraghty has been t...Fact, a man who isn't John Geraghty has been taken by him. We have corrected such error.<br /><br />Fact, John Geraghty is said to be a Leicester businessman. We have corrected such error.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.com