tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post6382391083729116120..comments2023-10-30T07:28:35.018+00:00Comments on Textusa: Tourism DietTextusahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comBlogger42125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-51199992726180043142015-04-16T19:25:39.595+01:002015-04-16T19:25:39.595+01:00A very angry Assistant Chief Constable of LP inter...A very angry Assistant Chief Constable of LP interviews on Channel 4 tonight, saying Janner should have been taken to court. Alison Saunders, CPS chief, defending her position, after receiving medical evidence of Janner's dementia.<br />Maybe LP are still smarting over the way they were manipulated in the Maddie case?<br />This isn't the end of the Jenner affair!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-78688334626455266392015-04-16T18:44:23.547+01:002015-04-16T18:44:23.547+01:00Richard d Hall!! Very informative.
But how have th...Richard d Hall!! Very informative.<br />But how have those "suspects",the Man and woman, not gone to the PJ to clear their names??Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-69931515544654642902015-04-16T15:01:41.513+01:002015-04-16T15:01:41.513+01:00Every photograph of the couple, the man and/or the...Every photograph of the couple, the man and/or the woman speaks for itself. All the time. McCann Erickson wouldn't do better. Richard Hall dissected the Phantoms in this case. To see for free at Richplanet.sloganmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14863986821574734718noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-13612306431443222262015-04-16T13:42:03.267+01:002015-04-16T13:42:03.267+01:00http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershir...http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-32329924<br />Richard Henriques will be investigating past CPS decisions on JannerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-19476093813379207972015-04-16T11:23:11.462+01:002015-04-16T11:23:11.462+01:00Hi Textusa, I know it is not relevant to this post...Hi Textusa, I know it is not relevant to this post,"Operation Enamel"love the name?<br />This investigation carried out by Leicestershire Police Force were deeply "disappointed" that the Crown Prosecution Service announced there decision Not to Prosecute a Peer with sexual abuse, The 86 yr old Labour Peer is now suffering with Dementia (no offence to dementia suffers intended) up until 2014, this peer was still active enough to attend the House of Lords and claim expenses in this role as a Lord?!<br />Rest in peace Mr Frank Beck, who had the integrity to stand up for the "Abused subjects". Mr Beck was jailed and was in the process of appealing his conviction when he apparently had a Heart Attack with in the prison, prior to this the man was in good health and the Solicitor representing him had a mysterious car accident!?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-43895049507002125982015-04-15T15:58:07.356+01:002015-04-15T15:58:07.356+01:0013.02 how is that a response to me(13.03) my comme...13.02 how is that a response to me(13.03) my comment was that people finding themselves in the same position knowing what they know today i.e. the release of the files and the rise of social media blogs, forums etc would not have allowed themselves to be caught up in this the way they have. I've said many times before I cringe when I read how Textusa exposes their lies imagine how they feel. I'm a law abiding citizen and this case makes we think twice before I commit anything to record. Besides the need to correct that I agree with your postAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-54143873431791879272015-04-15T15:57:56.537+01:002015-04-15T15:57:56.537+01:00Stand corrected then, JJ.
Maintain she said it al...Stand corrected then, JJ.<br /><br />Maintain she said it also in the memorable moment described.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-81492778132311822892015-04-15T15:44:11.053+01:002015-04-15T15:44:11.053+01:00Jane Tanner made the statement about the football ...Jane Tanner made the statement about the football in her rogatory statement to the Leics police .(Part 4)JJnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-42717394728923629532015-04-15T14:55:57.050+01:002015-04-15T14:55:57.050+01:00Wasn't Jane's Partner Russell O'Brien ...Wasn't Jane's Partner Russell O'Brien looking after their daughter who was struck by illness on his children check with Matt Oldfield around the same time as Gerry was absent from the BRT?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-86694607514197599812015-04-15T14:49:43.366+01:002015-04-15T14:49:43.366+01:00Anonymous 15 Apr 2015, 14:23:00,
It's Jane Ta...Anonymous 15 Apr 2015, 14:23:00,<br /><br />It's Jane Tanner who says that Kate was worried about Gerry taking too long in his check because he was probably watching football.<br /><br />It's not a statement to the police. It's something she says for the Channel 4's "The Cutting Edge" a 2009 documentary which we call here the Mockumentary. She says when she's told that not knowing on which side ot a street 2 men (one with a stroller facing "that way") are is just a discrepancy.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-36021108386550079902015-04-15T14:23:49.569+01:002015-04-15T14:23:49.569+01:00Hi Textusa,on the night that Madeleine disappeared...Hi Textusa,on the night that Madeleine disappeared/Abducted? <br />Did GM/KH say in a statement that Gerry was watching Football on TV in the Apartment on his 21.05 check of the children?<br />You would think it "Odd" that a parent would be watching football in an apartment, whilst you Kin are a sleep,"Gerry must have had the sound turned down, so as not to disturb the Abductor, Sorry about being flippant?!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-59419611327335787782015-04-15T13:02:10.357+01:002015-04-15T13:02:10.357+01:00in reply to anon 13.03, "Celebrity status&quo...in reply to anon 13.03, "Celebrity status"All we know for certain is reliance on the "Witness Statements taken"that Madeleine McCann was last seen a live by her parents and DP in apartment 5A Ocean Club Complex 3 May 2007.17.30-22.00hrs Fact?!<br />Sonia Poulton and Rosilinda Hutton, must have kissed and made up from their MSM/SC*M spat,be wary, the Neglect of the parents scenario?<br />SP has not produced her response documentary about the disgusting treatment of Mrs. Brenda Leyland of the disappearance of Madeleine wanting the Truth to be heard!<br />Aspersions are being cast that the MSM/Murdoch's are possibly funding this documentary?<br />It is becoming some what "cloak and dagger" and would seem to be based on the Judicial proceedings in Portugal defamation case of who triumphs, I would like to remind people that it is not Celebrity status that has made this case?<br />The person's who made the disappearance of "Madeleine into celebrity status" were the McCann and Healy,Corner, famlies/CM subverting the "Official Investigation process?" Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-61144140427205737162015-04-14T22:23:29.457+01:002015-04-14T22:23:29.457+01:00A poem for the latest unpublished anons:
The List...A poem for the latest unpublished anons:<br /><br />The List<br /><br />Now listen carefully ,<br />I'll only say this one time<br />as I'm only a little cat<br />and I don't 'do' rhyme<br />I know you're new here<br />and that's understood ,<br />but if you want to stay here<br />you have to be good<br />There's a list of rules<br />for this house<br />that includes no climbing curtains<br />or chasing the 'pet' mouse<br />If you follow the list,<br />life here<br />can be very, very sweet<br />you'll get a nice comfy bed<br />and plenty to eat<br />Talking about food<br />there' s just a couple more things<br />I'd like to say<br />before we dine,<br />We have to say 'Grace' first<br />so please get in line<br />and what's more important<br />is this fact,<br />That 's your bowl there<br />and this one' s mine.<br /><br />From our friend Rosemary Smith from Facebook<br />https://www.facebook.com/MoondampRoses/posts/10206992271032234Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-20196338234436198592015-04-14T22:16:56.257+01:002015-04-14T22:16:56.257+01:00Working for a private health company, whose shareh...Working for a private health company, whose shareholders comprise mainly GPs / consultants / specialty doctors etc I can assure that no drug company would stage any conference / sales exhibition in such a place as this. Please think again. YOu have only to use google to see a typical location ofr a drug related conference. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-57873470833538532622015-04-14T21:13:29.561+01:002015-04-14T21:13:29.561+01:00Anonymous 14 Apr 2015, 19:51:00,
To say "the...Anonymous 14 Apr 2015, 19:51:00,<br /><br />To say "there were quite a few more doctors than one or two" is a little too generic.<br /><br />Could you please list the other doctors present besides the T9? The 6 to 8 (at least) others you say you think were present plus name the NHS PFI expert you speak of.<br /><br />Also, could you please say where in PdL is that 75 seat conference room?Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-92163734945677592372015-04-14T19:51:44.983+01:002015-04-14T19:51:44.983+01:00There were quite a few more doctors than one or tw...There were quite a few more doctors than one or two, they did not all seem to have their title on the guest list. I would think at least six to eight more plus NHS PFI expert. Looked more like a pharma freebie hence reluctance to reveal how booking was paid by GM. Plus conference room with 75 seats - could be to push latest drugs. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-37487805787454213482015-04-14T17:54:32.639+01:002015-04-14T17:54:32.639+01:00Hi,i am new here to this Blog,and the research and...Hi,i am new here to this Blog,and the research and detail of the case is so commendable!<br /><br />I have followed this case since day one and it's unbelieveable that it hasn't been solved!(poor Madeleine)<br />It is simply heart wrenching!!<br />Thank you for all your work on putting this great Forum together,i do very much enjoy reading,along with The Mccann Files!<br />Lilly,HamshireAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-42745315589046701572015-04-14T13:03:33.259+01:002015-04-14T13:03:33.259+01:00Of course you are correct in this. I think that ha...Of course you are correct in this. I think that had the rest of those involved been aware of the "celebrity status" that this case would attract, everyone (barr none) of them would have made different decisions with regards the lies and deciet they perpretrated. I think this is a massive advantage that the current investigation has over the first investigation. Those being interviewed this time are forewarned.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-11989038798326834202015-04-12T22:50:58.671+01:002015-04-12T22:50:58.671+01:00Thanks Textusa for another detailed and well resea...Thanks Textusa for another detailed and well researched post.<br /><br />That staff to guest ratio is rather extraordinary isn't it, pre-season.<br /><br />I hadn't realised the Hills didn't appear on either the Ocean Club or Mark Warner staff lists.<br /><br />That's very interesting.<br /><br />Nuala xAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-73808261045466476422015-04-12T19:34:18.943+01:002015-04-12T19:34:18.943+01:00Anonymous 12 Apr 2015, 18:44:00,
Please do not co...Anonymous 12 Apr 2015, 18:44:00,<br /><br />Please do not confuse cannot with will not. We will not.<br /><br />The political courage to solve this case (using Mr Amaral«s words) is independent of political power.<br /><br />The arguments we have presented against closure of case are valid independent of individual at Nº10. It was Nº10 who opened the case, only Nº10 can close it. With all the implications that means.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-25034994351246624002015-04-12T19:31:20.890+01:002015-04-12T19:31:20.890+01:00Anonymous 12 Apr 2015, 17:35:00,
Mr Edmonds says ...Anonymous 12 Apr 2015, 17:35:00,<br /><br />Mr Edmonds says he handed the pictures over to the police. The pictures in the files have been intentionally saturated into black and white to avoid recognition as stated in the PJ Files.<br /><br />If we were to recognise Mr Edmonds photos, it would mean the PJ had done a bad job. <br /><br />The photos we do recognise are those which we have the original to compare with.<br /><br />This means we do not know if the Mr Edmonds pictures are or not in the files (saying this because he could have handed them over to the British authorities, who, as we know, have withheld documentation).<br /><br />The option to show them publicly is a choice to be made by Mr Edmonds, not anyone else.<br /><br />We see no reason for Mr Edmonds to lie and see many for him to be have been truthful, namely the "celebrity status" that the case had already achieved when he wrote the letter, which would strongly advise not to put on paper anything that he wasn't sure of.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-44940912699282436912015-04-12T18:44:11.011+01:002015-04-12T18:44:11.011+01:00Hi Textusa, If you cannot debate"sub child th...Hi Textusa, If you cannot debate"sub child theory"Doe's this mean another addition to your theories post threads, as a previous post I had read, that "No Cadaver"was detected on a male person's clothing or it wasn't subjected to Eddie and Keela, Cadaver dogs are unreliable when their work is scrutinised,GM?<br />I know it is not your concern,but if the Labour Party are elected to form the next UK Government, will they suddenly bring to conclusion "Operation Grange"certain Buddies had close friends in 2007-2010.former Home Secretary Alan Johnson declined to re-open Madeleine's disappearance,what did he know and who it could implicate?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-50625130529722838272015-04-12T17:35:56.457+01:002015-04-12T17:35:56.457+01:00More great writings Textusa!
Can i ask why you thi...More great writings Textusa!<br />Can i ask why you think Edmonds' photographs of Madeleine weren't shown publicly,surely it isn't just because of "Swinging"??<br />And ,that being the case,Edmonds would'nt have mentioned annything about his Photographs????<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-37209406566813864592015-04-12T10:25:40.692+01:002015-04-12T10:25:40.692+01:00We do no go for death before 3rd ecause existing e...We do no go for death before 3rd ecause existing evidence points otherwise.<br /><br />Hastily changed timelines, conflicting statements Gerry and Kate's attitudes suggest a panicky response on the night (if planned, would they not be actively participating in bogus search, being themselves the first to convince others to play along?)<br /><br />The mistakes made, window, pointing to wrong bed, no sheets on the cots, sedated twins show that they were reacting rather than acting.<br /><br />What was the gain in waiting? To get their act together? It seems they didn't make any good use of that time. Not even to get a big round table to show where they sat at.<br /><br />Don't the retrofit stories you allege prove the exact opposite? If they did have the time to think things through, why the need to retrofit the thought out story?<br /><br />What about Philip Edmonds letter about Maddie being in playground on May 3rd He states clearly he photographed Maddie. Is Edmonds a liar? We think he was telling the truth.<br /><br />Is it because of the créche sheets (evidently as fake as the Tapas reservation sheets) have doubtful handwritings? Those sheets have a purpose and it wasn't to show that Maddie was or wasn't there.<br /><br />Is it because of the last picture being evidently photoshopped? And the photoshopping of other pictures? And that proves what? For us it proves that they were desperate in showing a family time that did not exist. They were not there to take family pics, so they didn't have them. But to justify a "family holiday" they had to produce some, didn't they? Aren't the ones known too few for a week's holiday? We think they are, but to photoshop takes time and effort and it's not as easy as taking a picture, is it?<br /><br />We are not persuaded by early death theories based on pre-planning, premeditated murder and substitute child - the one who has been named, has been so without ANY no supporting evidence the child was ever present. A terrible way to involve a real child in a totally unbelievable scenario.<br /><br />We do not fall for the myth that all blonde-girls look alike. That is as stupid and xenophobic as saying that all Chinese or all black people look alike. We challenge people to google up a pic of a 4 yr old blonde girl we would confuse with Maddie.<br /><br />And did sub-girl have a coloboma (or significant "fleck" in her eye as per late mind changing of her parents about the illness)? The picture on the cover of Kate's book shows clearly a girl with a very significant mark on her eye which would make inevitably anyone looking at her notice it.<br /><br />Please understand why death before the third exists.<br /><br />It benefits only one person.<br /><br />All others (guests, Ocean Club and nannies) are "thrown" from participants who were caught up in events and complied lie so as to "confirm" a scenario that was condemning to the T9 into being active participants who acted in a disgusting and sick play in roles they accepted for days to be a part of.<br /><br />This said, we inform we will not get into any debate on the sub child theory. We think we have sufficiently justified why we won't.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-31492464346789895642015-04-12T10:19:04.351+01:002015-04-12T10:19:04.351+01:00Anonymous11 Apr 2015, 17:56:00
As promised we wil...Anonymous11 Apr 2015, 17:56:00<br /><br />As promised we will do so. According to our own timings, evidentlly.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.com