tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post5881273413379700192..comments2023-10-30T07:28:35.018+00:00Comments on Textusa: Doing a TANNERTextusahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comBlogger116125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-74826009459298987632011-08-29T19:00:11.960+01:002011-08-29T19:00:11.960+01:00I went back to Insane's post. The all post is ...I went back to Insane's post. The all post is a self- confession as Angelique pointed out a very important sentence. But I get curious with some other passages as well:<br /><br />..." I have said and posted many constructive things.....Like that second list of diners, on the S&S notepaper - you made false claims about certain of those diners, which I <br />corrected.....You have confused one of the people listed with another individual with the same surname who stayed there the previous week. I posted the correct copy of the register......<br /><br />.....The inclusive tariff at Mark Warner's allowed people to take dinner at the Tapas, limited covers were available.....<br /><br />....There is no evidence whatsoever that the OC staff or <br />management, third party guests or local residents were involved...."<br /><br />- Which second list is Insane talking about?<br />- "You have confused one of the people listed with another individual with the same surname who stayed there the previous week"- what is that? Confusing one people(person) with another individual( person) with same surname? How can he says that without knowing those people? Up to now, I saw on the S&S list one surname which could have been wrote with a mistake - Newman. But I was thinking is the same individual and who wrote the list made a spelling error. Now Insane is saying there is two individuals with same surname and one stays in the resort one week before. Waw! What a coincidence! And a big WAW!!! how he knows that if such information is not on the police files? I didn't remember to see it on the files. But he didn't stops to surprise me... He said, he provide a correct list. Where is that list and how can he have a correct list? Is it a bluf? If not, where he found the correct list? Is he talking about the Hindy, which name was crossed on one of the lists?<br />- And what about that part on his post ..."local residents were involved"- why bringing the local residents if we are discussing a guests list? There is residents on the Tapas list. Or there was residents there that night which names are not on the list?<br /><br />Off course the shape of the table is relevant, specially because Kate and Tanner made a huge mistake. The table they describe on their statements is not the same they show or somebody show to polices and journalists as the T9 table. That is available at Pamalam and you can see it while clicking on Tapas/ bar photos. is the same in Amaral book and the place (canopy) is the same in Martin Brunt video. BUT YOU CANNOT SEAT 9 PEOPLE AROUND THAT TABLE AND YOU CANNOT JOIN 2 TABLES TO MAKE A BIG ROUND TABLE. Even, if the T 9 were special guests, I don't believe the Tapas brought a special furniture to that guests on that special week and the table was removed immediately after the alarm. Journalists have been there, with an accurate eye, and they will have described the table with some adjectives, like " different", " big", if was different then the others. I revisited many articles from the first week and not a single journalist reports any difference between the tables. Then, must be the table available in Pamalam. On that table you can have people seating around with drinks, but not with food. This bring me again to what I believe... The Tapas was a meeting point for May 3 and not a dinning point. That's why Diane W. Did not get bothered with alarm and just left the table 5 minutes after.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-88908212780835973532011-08-29T11:12:30.274+01:002011-08-29T11:12:30.274+01:00Anon @ Aug 29, 2011 10:31:00 AM
They're going...Anon @ Aug 29, 2011 10:31:00 AM<br /><br />They're going after anyway who has earned a cent on this. And that is what they're attacking, not facts. They can't discuss facts. And if there's anyone who's made a bundle out of this, it was them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-7842767448364404922011-08-29T10:41:56.688+01:002011-08-29T10:41:56.688+01:00Angeligue,
Not only does he say it TWICE on
Aug ...Angeligue,<br /><br />Not only does he say it TWICE on <br />Aug 28, 2011 9:27:00:<br /><br />"How would any of you idiots like it if your name came into the public domain BECAUSE YOU WERE WITNESS TO CRIME, and some mad bitch set up a site in which she called you a liar, and claimed you were ACTUALLY INVOLVED IN THE CRIME YOU WITNESSED? Just ponder on that for a moment"<br /><br />as he says it again on Aug 28, 2011 1:09:00 PM:<br /><br />"I notice no-one had the balls to answer my question about how you would feel if this was done to you - IF YOU WERE A WITNESS TO A CRIME and some deranged cow on the internet accused YOU OF BEING INVOLVED. You are all a complete disgrace."<br /><br />Why is he so worried about the reputation of those he says offended by Textusa who arrived 4 days after as he says? According to him they couldn't possibly have been WITNESSES.<br /><br />Notice how he often uses DEATH and CRIME. <br /><br />It's plain to see why he has such a keen interest in all this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-45300649818142631752011-08-29T10:31:00.905+01:002011-08-29T10:31:00.905+01:00"...All the false claims you have made again..."...All the false claims you have made against innocent third parties have been logged and recorded so that they can be passed on at the relevant times.<br /><br />I think you will find that when you are called to account for the lies you have published about innocent people, endlessly bleating ''tapas booking sheets!'' and ''we are getting to the truth'' is going to fall some way short of saving your bacon."- insane<br /><br />Too much for who just witness a crime .... Too much for who pretend to look like a Samaritan by defending unknown people. Too much bothered for a so small detail, the lists and the round table. <br />We know why the McCann's don't touch Textusa. Because they don't want to publicize a place where the truth is being exposed. They want people away from here and from Joana Morais and are trying to use the libel against Tony Benneth to scare who touch their abduction fairy tail. In van....a secret can't last forever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-84241625384111395222011-08-29T09:11:06.664+01:002011-08-29T09:11:06.664+01:00From The Last Post......
"You have confused ...From The Last Post......<br /><br />"You have confused one of the people listed with another individual with the same surname who stayed there the previous week"<br /><br />And who would this person be????? The one who wanted 2 weeks childcare but only stayed at OC 'one week'?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-61285541187299608072011-08-29T07:50:54.964+01:002011-08-29T07:50:54.964+01:00Thank you for spotting that Angelique!
It about s...Thank you for spotting that Angelique!<br /><br />It about says it all, doesn't it?Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-1553945440838134032011-08-29T00:46:27.121+01:002011-08-29T00:46:27.121+01:00Does this comment posted mean what I think it mean...Does this comment posted mean what I think it means?<br /><br /><br />"How would any of you idiots like it if your name came into the public domain because you were witness to a crime, and some mad bitch set up a site in which she called you a liar, and claimed you were actually involved in the crime you witnessed? Just ponder on that for a moment<br /><br />Aug 28, 2011 9:27:00 AM"<br /><br />It's this bit that puzzles me "and claimed you were actually involved in the crime you witnessed"<br />Or am inreading it wrongAngeliquenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-35458189557708698022011-08-28T23:53:56.731+01:002011-08-28T23:53:56.731+01:00He/she is one of them and is very scared. The last...He/she is one of them and is very scared. The last post is a confession on itself and reminds me another guy- Marcos Aragao Correia, who tried to destroy Amaral with the despicable excuse of defending a crap criminal which judges had no doubts, she is guilt. He, it was obvious what were the motivations: The easy money and the publicity. End up running back to Madeira and I have serious doubts if he will escape untouched because one day the case will be reopenned.<br /> It is clear, they had a 10, 11 or 12 Tapas, who help them that night. Must be somebody close to the location or in loccus and somebody speaking english to avoid been lost in translations but knowing portuguese. Insane, knows portuguese and the way he/she talks about the lists he/she is not the waiter who bring the food to the tables, or who is cooking at the kitchen. those are small characters which cannot play a big roll. they are too danger, too risky to have them involved. As we can see in SOL articles, most of the workers from the OC were criticising the Mccann's. Some lost their jobs, probably due to the dificult to close their mouths specially to inquisitive journalists. But those were the minor players who could suspect something but know nothing. Who knows, must be close to the top and is now very scared. Isn't interesting seeying Insane saying Madeleine death? <br /> From his/her post, is quite clear how Insane hate the Mccann's. He must have his/her reasons for that. They leave him/her under that situation and still pressuring, which better word is threatning.<br /> Textusa blog is a space of free opinion. Mccann's refused to do the reconstruction and prove their innocence. The case could be solved by now and that blog, like many others, without any reason to exist. They choose to remain suspects and leave all the people who shared the space and the moments they spend in PDL under the same suspiction. As PJ said, all are suspects untill they can be cleared. I believe, many were cleared already by what the police knows and is not in public domain. Few remain attached to the circumstances without credible explanations to justify some stranges behavior. There is not a logical reason to have 2 lists of the same guests and one in a so strange papers. Gerry already prove how he wants to control everything. O'Brien told it to Felicia Cabrita and the words of the owner of a bar in Vilamoura are one more proof. They moved the world that night, before the alarm. Too much for who don't get bothered with search and wait until the sunrise to go out, was too cold and too dark.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-71422572694094984782011-08-28T19:31:43.964+01:002011-08-28T19:31:43.964+01:00Thank you Ross and I do hope we hear more from you...Thank you Ross and I do hope we hear more from you.Sina Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07122327122783750562noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-52713995812191496932011-08-28T19:28:27.723+01:002011-08-28T19:28:27.723+01:00Insane's post:
"Blogger Sina J said...
...Insane's post:<br /><br />"Blogger Sina J said...<br /><br />..... It is noticeable that you never mention wanting to seek the truth of what happened to little Maddie. If fact you never mention her at all.<br /><br />As it is the intention of this blog to find the truth of what happened on 3rd May(and readers do consider various possibilities) I suggest unless you do have something to contribute that you stay away. It is giving you stress beyond credibility if, as you say, you do not know any of the people involved or are part of OC or MW staff.''<br /><br />I have often wondered what your motivations is - I guess you are just as thick as the others.<br /><br />Contributors to my blog - an intelligent bunch, it has to be said - see you and this blog for what you are. A group of witless liars intent on promoting yourselves at the expense of innocent people.<br /><br />The really laughable part is that I have said and posted many constructive things, many of which you have been too cowardly to publish, probably because they would show up your desperately poor research. Like that second list of diners, on the S&S notepaper - you made false claims about certain of those diners, which I corrected, but perhaps you are just too much of an egotist to admit you made a mistake. Why don't you go back and look again? You have confused one of the people listed with another individual with the same surname who stayed there the previous week. I posted the correct copy of the register, but you ignored it. Sadly, all of this gets posted to my blog, so my contributors can see what a fraud and a liar you are.<br /><br />Don't kid yourselves that you are ''truthseekers''<br /><br />You started off with a theory of what happened to Madeleine, and have tried to construct a case around this. If anything doesn't fit with your central thesis, it is rejected or ignored.<br /><br />So here are a few home truths for you<br /><br />You and the other idiots who contribute to this blog are providing assistance to the McCanns, by making it appear that those who do not believe them are all nutcases<br /><br />Textusa's central thesis is just that - a construct. It has no basis in truth whatsoever.None. Nada.<br /><br />The inclusive tariff at Mark Warner's allowed people to take dinner at the Tapas, limited covers were available<br /><br />The obsession with a table sufficiently large enough, be it round or otherwise, is completely ridiculous. As are your further claims about what size groups were placed on various tables. The Tapas group dined at the Tapas. Get over it.<br /><br />There is no evidence whatsoever that the OC staff or management, third party guests or local residents were involved in any conspiracy to cover up Madeleine's death, or that they were involved in any way. Nor do you have any justification for your cruel comments about Mrs Fenn, Robert Murat, his mother or any other resident of PdL.<br /><br />In summary, your claims and theories are as ridiculous as those put forward by the whackjobs who believe the US government blew up their own citizens and flew holographic planes into the WTC which they then felled in controlled explosions.<br /><br />The McCanns do nothing to discourage blogs like yours - do you know why? Because every day you convince people that they are right when they say they are persecuted by mentally ill posters.<br /><br />You can publish my posts or not - it's immaterial. Any laughable crap you post on here will be pulled to pieces on my place in any case. All the false claims you have made against innocent third parties have been logged and recorded so that they can be passed on at the relevant times.<br /><br />I think you will find that when you are called to account for the lies you have published about innocent people, endlessly bleating ''tapas booking sheets!'' and ''we are getting to the truth'' is going to fall some way short of saving your bacon.<br /><br />Go and find something useful to do with your lives, preferably without hurting other people the way you do at present.<br /><br />Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at Aug 28, 2011 5:18:00 PM "Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-16552088484958607522011-08-28T19:27:59.475+01:002011-08-28T19:27:59.475+01:00As Sina J said, we've put a stop to Insane'...As Sina J said, we've put a stop to Insane's comments. We have since received another. As it is a befitting FINAL comment of the character because it sums up Insane's opinions, which is more than he is done in previous posts, we've decided to publish it. It will be up to the readers to read, understand and come to a conclusion. The blog is to continue to be an Insane-free blog. As it has quite a lot of wording, we'll publish it in a separate post.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-29987604049120654262011-08-28T19:13:06.646+01:002011-08-28T19:13:06.646+01:00Sina J and Textusa you have been very tolerant so ...Sina J and Textusa you have been very tolerant so far and Insane does not impress me as a searcher of truth.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-63889688098853922362011-08-28T19:12:07.370+01:002011-08-28T19:12:07.370+01:00This is the first time I have commented here, but...This is the first time I have commented here, but I wanted to thank the Anon who posted the Sol article. I don't see how anyone could read that with an objective eye and not draw the obvious conclusion. What struck me was learning that when they were staying at the villa they dumped the twins at the Ocean Club crèche every day. They were surrounded by friends and family who could look after them while they were busy giving interviews to the press and organising the fund, and you would think that their mother would not want to let them out of her sight, let alone send them back to the place where it all happened. Truly there is cold blood running in those veins. Personally, I don't think there will ever be a satisfactory conclusion to this matter, the powerful interests that have been present from the very start will see to that. <br /><br />For anyone who is British and under the age of thirty, that Sol article is what is called investigative journalism, a symptom of a free press. A journalist tracks down the facts and details, and lays them out in a form known as reportage. We used to have that occasionally in the UK, but not any more. If there is one thing that people can learn from all this regarding, to coin a phrase, the wider agenda, it is that we do not have a free press (or media) in Britain. In this case they have acted en bloc, serving up variations on the 'Kate's anguish at abduction hell' theme while absolutely ignoring or dismissing the realities laid out so methodically by Felicia Cabrita above.<br /><br />The investigative journalist in the British media is as relevant today as the fletcher is to the armed forces. Now there is just the official view, deviation from the Ministry of Information press release is unpermitted. In to this void of veracity, for the time being at least, steps the citizen journalist. In this era, of what I suspect we will one day look back on and call the free internet, conscientious individuals with no vested interest other than a nagging desire to right wrongs, can piece together puzzles and take up the task so egregiously neglected by the Fourth Estate. Textusa and her kin are such examples, and I would like to add my support to them for their diligence and steadfastness in the face of the screaming beast.Rossnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-61633678327653020902011-08-28T19:00:39.605+01:002011-08-28T19:00:39.605+01:00Well done Sisters!Well done Sisters!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-80650616561321754242011-08-28T18:51:40.752+01:002011-08-28T18:51:40.752+01:00Anon Aug 28, 2011 6:21:00 PM
Second that!Anon Aug 28, 2011 6:21:00 PM<br /><br />Second that!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-27463289386752339282011-08-28T18:21:28.104+01:002011-08-28T18:21:28.104+01:00"If you can translate that into English, I..."If you can translate that into English, I'll answer it"<br /><br />I think this sums up the kind of we're up against. <br /><br />The kind of person that the UK opted to defend, and making itself to be publicly humiliated.<br /><br />To the all the Portuguese readers who make a significant effort to contribute in a language foreign to them, I for one thank you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-49136179671823662202011-08-28T16:30:14.506+01:002011-08-28T16:30:14.506+01:00Aug 28, 2011 2:45:00 PM
You have been given a cha...Aug 28, 2011 2:45:00 PM<br /><br />You have been given a chance to say something constructive but have so far contributed abuse. It's juvenile and unproductive. <br /><br />As you have your own blog, which we really don't want to know about, then I suggest you post comments there where your attitude will be welcome.<br /><br />It is noticeable that you never mention wanting to seek the truth of what happened to little Maddie. If fact you never mention her at all.<br /><br />As it is the intention of this blog to find the truth of what happened on 3rd May(and readers do consider various possibilities) I suggest unless you do have something to contribute that you stay away. It is giving you stress beyond credibility if, as you say, you do not know any of the people involved or are part of OC or MW staff.Sina Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07122327122783750562noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-20361248454740447682011-08-28T15:03:42.535+01:002011-08-28T15:03:42.535+01:00. CONT: "According to a member of the Ocean C.... CONT: "According to a member of the Ocean Club's staff who was helping out as an interpreter that night, between the group of nine friends and the GNR, the McCann couple didn't stop calling journalists. They were moving influences in the British media, where they also have relatives. Around 6 a.m, Sky News breaks the first news. The abduction idea is launched. "<br /><br />Policia Judiciaria reconstructs crime Sol-15 sept 2007:<br />"If Maddie was in fact murdered, the McCanns could not have hidden the cadaver alone – which means they had to have the help from a third party.".." PJ wants to verify the only routes that the McCann family and their friends knew, which derived from their daily routine. The first leads to a vacant terrain, behind the Millennium restaurant; the second one was usually made to go to the beach. Both routes have already been trailed by the sniffer dogs."..."Before the dogs went onto the terrain, an airplane which is equipped with temperature and infrared rays cameras made a complete 'sweep' of the area from the Ocean Club until the cliffs. The infrared cameras detect the existence of land shifts (in England, they have detected cadavers under cement) and the temperature cameras are used to detect changes of temperature in the earth (given the fact that decomposing bodies register more elevated temperatures)."..."As Sol could discover, the dogs detected cadaver odour behind a couch in the apartment's living room, close to a window that leads to the resort's back area.<br /> <br />This window had curtains that were removed and analysed by police, and a small blood sample was detected. Both the curtains and the wall where it was located at, had been washed. If the information that the Irish citizen gave to Sol three months ago is confirmed, the child was wearing pink pyjamas, and Smith noticed no blood stains...."<br /> ""People are saying they always walked hand in hand, and that he squeezed her hand when she talked too much". <br /><br />ONE HOUR, WAS THE DURATION OF THE DINNER, ACCORDING TO THE WAITERS. HOW CAN KATE GET 2 SO DIFFERENT MAIN COURSES IN A SO SHORT TIME?<br />They lie trough the all mouth and who help them lies along with them. Why? Because they received money from the fund or because they help them that night?<br /><br /> <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-87332978529946787032011-08-28T15:02:06.487+01:002011-08-28T15:02:06.487+01:00CONT: CONT: ."Aurelio Guerreiro, the owner of...CONT: CONT: ."Aurelio Guerreiro, the owner of a bar at the marina in Vilamoura, was close to being involved. His testimony to Sol confuses the McCanns' time version. Sometime between 0.30 and 1 a.m., Aurelio got a phonecall from an old customer: Pat Perkins, the human resources director from a public English organism. She calls him, upset: "She told me the daughter of British friends of hers, who were holidaying close to Lagos, had disappeared over 3 hours ago, that they were completely alone and that nobody was helping them to search for her".<br /><br />Kate McCann had just informed her parents of the tragedy. Pat, who lives in Liverpool, confirms: "I was at Kate's parents' house at that moment. But I have nothing further to add". <br /><br />Guerreiro tells what he did after Pat called him: "I understood she wanted me to go meet them, but I was an hour away from their location, and I could not close the bar, I decided to call the police". After PJ in Portimao confirmed to him they already knew about the case, Aurelio phoned Kate, at the number that Pat had given him: "An Englishman picked up. He thanked me, and contrary to what I expected, he didn't ask me for anything". Minutes after this phonecall, Gerry asks for the priest from the Luz parish to be called for him - but the Ocean Club staff members refused, given the time it was. Gerry, given the fact that the priest didn't appear, asked another element of GNR to show him the way to the church. "...."The path that the English dogs followed 2 weeks ago, in the surroundings of the apartment, exclude the possibility that the child was abducted and is still alive. The dogs walked the only two paths that Maddie's family and friends knew. <br />One of them leads to Luz beach. The Irish citizen Martin Smith, a local resident for years, told Sol that on that night he crossed ways with a man who was carrying a child with the characteristics of Maddie. That path was searched by police and other people. Six days after the disappearance, Gerry, who was accompanied by an unknown individual, also seemed to participate in the searches, but on the opposite side of the way the dogs walked. "CONTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-50494384882734902232011-08-28T14:57:20.333+01:002011-08-28T14:57:20.333+01:00CONT: CONT: "Under the magnifying glass- 4 Au...CONT: CONT: "Under the magnifying glass- 4 Aug 2007:<br />"The tests that were made this week on the car that was used by the McCann couple, indicates that the police believe that Maddie's body may have been moved from the place where it was initially hidden, over the last two months."..." authorities bet on the reconstruction of the route that was taken to hide the body. During this week, the PJ and elements of the English police - accompanied by the Cockers that SOL surprised on the beach and in a valley that is close to the resort, last week - performed several diligences inside and outside several houses. The <br />authorities seem to have concluded that Maddie's body is buried in the vicinity of the apartment that was occupied by the McCanns, or was thrown into the sea."..."The English dogs marked the death inside the apartment. And Portuguese dogs did not find any trace on the outside....Pinto da Costa, a forensic doctor, who says a<br /> perfume on the body is enough to lose the dogs."<br />"It is in these four hours - between the time the McCann couple picked up their children at the creche and the time Kate noticed her daughter was missing - that lies the solution to this mystery. This is also where the inconsistencies are found, between the versions that are reported by the couple and their friends. "<br />..." Matthew met Gerry McCann when both doctors worked together at a hospital in Leicester. Matt has a pending accusation for medical negligence in that hospital, after a late diagnosis resulted in the death of a patient."..."After studying at the same university as David Payne, O'Brien met Jane, with whom he has two children. The friendship between Russell and David is so strong that he chose him as his wedding godfather when he made his relationship with Fiona official, in Italy. Coincidentally, Jane and Kate became pregnant at the same time, as the O'Brien couple's oldest daughter is exactly the same age as Maddie."..<br /><br />New contradictions in Maddie's case- 18 Aug 2007:<br />"The version that the McCann couple and their group of friends have been giving about what happened on the night that Madeleine disappeared, is shaken by new testimonies that were collected by Sol"..."Mrs Fenn told Sol that, on the night before she disappeared, Maddie cried for quite some time, calling out "daddy, daddy!". Also the table waiters that were working in the resort's restaurant -the Tapas, where the group of friends had dinner that night - didn't notice much movement of checking on the children. One of them guaranteed to Sol that, since the beginning of dinner (which started between 8.30 and 9 p.m.), only two men got up, almost simultaneously. One of them was Russell <br />O'Brien....During the short hour that dinner lasted, the group asked for, and consumed at their table, eight bottles of red wine and six of white wine, according to the restaurant's records....CONTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-22916699550774082832011-08-28T14:52:14.428+01:002011-08-28T14:52:14.428+01:00The possible involvement of the remainder of the t...The possible involvement of the remainder of the tapas group is utterly irrelevant. The issue is the false accusations made against other holidaymakers, residents and the OC staff. You could have saved yourself all that cutting and pasting.<br /><br />I think you will find that the PJ didn't make unsupported statements accusing all those people of being involved in a conspiracy to cover up the death of a child.<br /><br />Like Textusa did. <br /><br /><br />Really, is this the best defence you can come up with? It's a pretty poor effort. But then, you are thick enough to have been taken in by Textusa, so I guess I should set the bar pretty lowAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-350335596622130942011-08-28T14:51:30.487+01:002011-08-28T14:51:30.487+01:00CONT:.CONT: McCanns talk to Portuguese on Friday S...CONT:.CONT: McCanns talk to Portuguese on Friday Sol- 8 Aug 2007:<br />"After the interview for the BBC, the McCanns plan a new contact with the media, promising they will not exclude the Portuguese journalists this time. According to the couple's public relations, David Hughes, Gerry and Kate "are planning a series of events" to mark the 100 days that <br />have passed since little Madeleine disappeared, next Saturday. One of those moments will be, as Hughes explained to Sol, a "collective interview, with several media" that will also be attended by Portuguese reporters "from TV and press". The revelation is made after the new attitude of Maddie's parents towards the media was criticised by Portuguese journalists"..<br />"The McCanns have been giving interviews to 3 English TV stations since 3 p.m. in a private villa in the Meia Praia area, near Lagos, answering questions from the British journalists. A video reporter from ITN, one of the TV stations that interviewed Kate and Gerry McCann today, talked to portuguese journalists that were on location and <br />commented that the interviews had been planned for two weeks. The interviews for three TV stations - BBC, Sky News and ITN -....last for one and a half hours. <br />...Yet, portuguese media only heard about the exclusive interviews to English journalists today, although they have contact with the McCanns spokespersons every day. In spite of not having been invited, Portuguese journalists <br />went to the place where Kate and Gerry give the interviews, hoping to talk to the couple, or at least to <br />understand why they changed their attitude towards the Portuguese media....During the trip between Praia da Luz and the villa in Lagos, the three cars that were accompanying the McCanns split in different directions in order to lose the Portuguese journalists. The English media guaranteed that the interviews will be released to the Portuguese media, but with an embargo until 7 a.m. <br />Friday. Portuguese journalists had no opportunity to ask questions to the couple, and did not manage to ask any questions through the three British channels. "CONTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-53966492664404165442011-08-28T14:47:26.823+01:002011-08-28T14:47:26.823+01:00CONT: CONT: ..." A journalist with the Daily ...CONT: CONT: ..." A journalist with the Daily Express – who has repeatedly contacted Sol searching for new information on this case – recognised this week that it is "difficult for an English newspaper to adopt a critical tone concerning Madeleine's parents...The Daily Express cited, in one of its last reports, the news that had been published by Sol, describing it as a "hate campaign" against the McCanns. The same journalist ended up confessing that "it's the only way we can transmit your data"....<br />"The 'Leaving No Stone Unturned' fund is not recognised by the Charity Commission, the entity that regulates all beneficient activities in the UK. "In order to be considered a charity, the fund would have to be constituted for the benefit of the public, and not to benefit one individual or a specific case", a source from the comission explained to Sol. According to the same source, the Charity Commission decided not to accept the request that was made by Madeleine's parents to register the fund, after analysing the<br /> purpose of the collection of donations: "The McCanns failed to prove that they are collecting money to help other cases that are similar to Madeleine's"..."The information that was collected with the English authorities contradicts the statements made by the McCanns' public relations to Sol, in our edition of July 7. Then, Justine McGuinness assured that the money that is received by Maddie's parents "is subject to very strict rules, that are imposed by British law on any charity fund". At that time, the spokesperson for Kate and Gerry even explained that the decision to establish a fund was born from the need to <br />"ensure that everything is done in a transparent way".<br /> Confronted with this inconsistency, Justine McGuiness corrects her initial statement: "The fund is not considered a charity, but it aims to comply with the high standards that are demanded by the Charity Commission".<br /> McGuinness does not explain why she did not clarify this from the beginning, but she guarantees that her role in the campaign to find Madeleine is to "be Gerry and Kate's spokesperson, and not the Fund's". ..."According to a source from the Charity Commission, this juridical status means that the money that is collected by the fund "is not exempt of taxes in the UK."CONTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-42862907780039029752011-08-28T14:47:11.310+01:002011-08-28T14:47:11.310+01:00''“Why lose sleep if some lunatic accuses ...''“Why lose sleep if some lunatic accuses you of doing something outrageous? I wouldn't.<br />Why lose sleep over what a lunatic has to say about other people? That's taking altruism to an absurd level.”<br /><br />Good to see you acknowledging that Textusa is a lunatic. The penny seems to have droppedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-8606465150971283192011-08-28T14:45:11.992+01:002011-08-28T14:45:11.992+01:00''I'm Anon Aug 28, 2011 10:47:00 AM.
...''I'm Anon Aug 28, 2011 10:47:00 AM.<br /><br />I'll rephrase Evidence A: There's no reason for for the existence of two identical lists of same guests, who arrived 4 days after Maddie disappeared, in separate pieces of paper, one nothing to do with the purpose of reserving dinner.<br /><br />Please don't divert and answer what is asked: why are there TWO lists?<br /><br />And don't forget again to discredit the other two. One, the one about the discrepancy of numbers involve DIRECTLY the OC Staff. Having only 20 covers was the justification for the T9 doing a block booking. The sheets show there were 47, and FREE tables. This clearly shows the involvement of the staff.''<br /><br /><br /><br />Utter horseshit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com