tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post5826769140757852163..comments2023-10-30T07:28:35.018+00:00Comments on Textusa: Game changerTextusahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comBlogger63125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-73566217816540509982017-02-19T11:18:40.849+00:002017-02-19T11:18:40.849+00:00Anonymous 16 Feb 2017, 18:04:00,
Just noticed now...Anonymous 16 Feb 2017, 18:04:00,<br /><br />Just noticed now that you seem to imply that the Supreme Justice Court came up with a new proven fact that was damaging to the McCanns.<br /><br />Let us remind readers that all the points numbered in the ruling (acórdão) are already from the first instance under proved and not proved facts.<br /><br />Then, even when they had won, they had lost.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-84357358901515349782017-02-17T00:16:21.464+00:002017-02-17T00:16:21.464+00:00I wonder if there are shades of the Ben Needham &q...I wonder if there are shades of the Ben Needham "result" afoot ie. "We've established that Ben is probably dead, and left it at that." I watched "The Moorside" second episode and was interested to note that the first charge the jury returned a verdict on was that of reckless abandonment, placing a child in a position wherein harm could have befallen it. Karen Matthews was found guilty on that count in the program.I haven't seen this mentioned in any of the red tops which reported on the program and public reactions to it,including the McCanns' "fury" etc. Hmmmm! New to commenting here Textusa but have been following your excellent work for a long time. Final point, I watched the interview where Gerry takes off his mic and refuses to participate futher (He's too ot) with a deaf friend lately.I could never fully make out what was being said but my lip- reading friend assures me that it went like this. When asked how they felt about the blood found in 5G he replies " You know what? THIS is all investigation and we're just being suspects". He then removes the mic and begins to protest that he was being asked questions about the POLICE investigation which he was not permitted to answer. However, my friend assures me that his word "THIS" was referring to the interview itself. Not important maybe, but it opened my eyes to how swiftly and convincingly he could dissemble. Hopefully Grange after its massive waste of tax-payers money and police resources will be compelled to account for itself without any wishy washy conclusions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-78002847105896941212017-02-16T19:41:48.752+00:002017-02-16T19:41:48.752+00:00Content of article:
Posted by portugalpress on Fe...Content of article:<br /><br />Posted by portugalpress on February 16, 2017<br />McCann spokesman admits parents “sufficiently realistic” to admit Maddie “probably dead” <br /><br />It’s the elephant in the room that media sources, up until now, have been carefully avoiding.<br /><br />Page 38, clause 75 of the Supreme Court ruling that blew a massive hole in the plans of Madeleine McCann’s parents to block the book by former PJ coordinator Gonçalo Amaral - that suggests they essentially invented their daughter’s abduction - states that as early as October 2007 (only five months after the little girl went missing), the couple’s spokesman Clarence Mitchell “affirmed” that Kate and Gerry McCann “were sufficiently realistic to admit that their daughter was probably dead”.<br /><br />In other words, nine months before Amaral even wrote the book that the couple claim “hampered the search” for their missing daughter, they were already “sufficiently realistic” to admit that the search would not bring her back to them.<br /><br />This is another slow-burning stick of dynamite hidden in the lengthy court ruling that also highlighted the panel of judges’ conclusion that the McCanns “have not been proved innocent” in their daughter’s disappearance (click here).<br /><br />It is not that the UK media has ‘missed’ the damning clause - the Daily Mail did in 2007 reveal that Madeleine’s father did not agree with it - but rather that it appears for now to be choosing to ignore it.<br /><br />A source working for a several tabloids has been in touch with the Resident to find out if the clause was highlighted by Portuguese papers.<br /><br />He reiterated his opinion that “the tide in UK is changing”.<br /><br />But it hasn’t stopped the rehashing of some very old stories as if they were new.<br /><br />The Daily Star’s this (Thursday) morning reports that the TVI documentary in which Amaral expounds his ‘theory’ that Madeleine died in a tragic accident in the holiday apartment has “appeared on the Internet in English after the couple spent nine years trying to ban it”.<br /><br />The story claims Madeleine’s parents are “considering legal action”.<br /><br />But what it fails to make clear is that the documentary has been online for the last eight years. It was uploaded on April 30, 2009 - and well over a million people in UK appear to have seen it.<br /><br />What will happen next is what everyone following this mystery is wondering.<br /><br />Our source continues to predict a media onslaught in Praia da Luz for the 10th year ‘anniversary’ of Madeleine’s disappearance, claiming most news services will “just rehash old stuff” but there are plans afoot to “present all the victims in this story who have since died”, including witnesses and former suspects.<br /><br />Meantime, Clarence Mitchell has been talking to the Sun online, saying that the McCann couple: “want to make it clear that they are not making any money out of Madeleine’s disappearance”.<br /><br />Any claims that they are, he said are “spurious nonsense” that “fits in with the Portuguese agenda”.<br /><br />natasha.donn@algarveresident.comTextusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-50745120129239552082017-02-16T18:04:01.979+00:002017-02-16T18:04:01.979+00:00Quite extraordinary!
"It’s the elephant in...Quite extraordinary! <br /><br />"It’s the elephant in the room that media sources, up until now, have been carefully avoiding.<br /><br />Page 38, clause 75 of the Supreme Court ruling that blew a massive hole in the plans of Madeleine McCann’s parents to block the book by former PJ coordinator Gonçalo Amaral - that suggests they essentially invented their daughter’s abduction - states that as early as October 2007 (only five months after the little girl went missing), the couple’s spokesman Clarence Mitchell “affirmed” that Kate and Gerry McCann “were sufficiently realistic to admit that their daughter was probably dead”.<br /><br />In other words, nine months before Amaral even wrote the book that the couple claim “hampered the search” for their missing daughter, they were already “sufficiently realistic” to admit that the search would not bring her back to them."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-75230276652969332302017-02-16T17:04:36.088+00:002017-02-16T17:04:36.088+00:00Reply to Su,is this the article
http://portugalres...Reply to Su,is this the article<br />http://portugalresident.com/mccann-spokesman-admits-parents-%E2%80%9Csufficiently-realistic%E2%80%9D-to-admit-maddie-%E2%80%9Cprobably-dead%E2%80%9DAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09860766080102193055noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-56984407889604549462017-02-16T15:29:50.109+00:002017-02-16T15:29:50.109+00:00I wish I could remember where I saw this today. Bu...I wish I could remember where I saw this today. But there was an image of Clarence Mitchell (black and white makes it easier on the eye) and the headlines were Kate and Gerry accept that Madeleine could be dead.<br />I found this interesting in the light of the case results that they are changing their story.<br />It is almost as if when they claimed that they believed so vehemently that she was still alive and yet using the funds to find her for costly legal battles - that this was a game changer and suddenly they can accept her death.<br />Any thoughts?suhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01229359526524987174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-81603248848291946272017-02-16T01:28:22.394+00:002017-02-16T01:28:22.394+00:00Anonymous, as I attended all the hearings, I have ...Anonymous, as I attended all the hearings, I have no doubt at all about the deep integrity of the first instance judge. She was certainly sorry for the MCs to have lost their daughter and sorry for GA to have no access to assets that would have allowed him to start a new activity, but she obviously had no sympathy for either the first or the latter. She perhaps thought that the MC didn't say all the truth and that GA took the success of his best (but short) seller book for granted. She was above all these trivialities, hence she sanctionned GA for not having been at the level (according to her criteria at least) of his charge in the Justice department.<br />I don't think she ever dreamt that GA would not lodge an appeal. She knew that the Appeal Court wouldn't grant the MCs the ridiculous amount they were resquesting.Anne A. Corrêa-Guedeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17652561394570212256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-82037931082994899612017-02-15T21:01:33.567+00:002017-02-15T21:01:33.567+00:00On one of the morning programmes a neighbour of Ka...On one of the morning programmes a neighbour of Karen Mathews was ask when she first suspected her involvement and she replied that it was when she went against police advice and gave the interview to the press. She went on to question who would do such a thing when they had been warned that giving interviews would potentially harm their child. Both presenters enthusiastically confirm that that was indeed a Big red flag that she knew more than she was saying.........the hyprocrisy of the British media never ceases to amaze Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-61750052600908181922017-02-15T12:41:47.270+00:002017-02-15T12:41:47.270+00:00Judges DESTROY McCanns - They should NOT be consid...Judges DESTROY McCanns - They should NOT be considered innocent! - YouTube<br /><br />https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=u8aNe18GGko&ebc=ANyPxKq6y6EOi3FMZKIm8dcqDe4Q3NBslBaCLWxqE4M9cFgTFXjFmdRs3iwypnRo_iKbPCvvMGqx2bW55VTY5eBXyHVz_XeeiQ<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-16485398619755334702017-02-15T12:39:54.666+00:002017-02-15T12:39:54.666+00:00http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2017...http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2017/01/31/mundo_global/1485884529_303379.html<br /><br />La Justicia de Portugal da la razón a un policía frente a la familia McCann<br />14 FEB 2017 - 16:25 CET <br /><br />El 3 de mayo de 2007, el matrimonio McCann se fue a cenar con unos amigos en el restaurante del Resort Playa de la Luz, en el Algarve, Portugal. En su apartamento de la planta baja, a 50 metros del restaurante, dejaron durmiendo a Maddie, su hija de cuatro años. Cuando regresaron de la cena, 90 minutos después, Maddie había desaparecido. Nunca más se ha sabido de ella.<br /><br />En la investigación estuvieron envueltos policías de Portugal y de la británica Scotland Yard, sin resultados positivos. En 2008, en el libro Maddie, la verdad de la mentira, su autor, el policía judicial Gonçalo Amaral, acusaba a los padres de la niña de ocultar información y de estar implicados en la desaparición de su hija. Los tribunales habían archivado cualquier implicación de los padres en la desaparición de su hija, pero tres días después el policía publicó el libro en el que les acusaba de nuevo.<br /><br />Hace dos años, el Tribunal de Justicia de Lisboa condenó al policía a pagar medio millón de euros a los padres de Maddie por los daños causados, además de prohibir la reedición del libro, la difusión del DVD y el reparto de los derechos de autor.<br /><br />Tras una sentencia del Tribunal de Segunda Instancia en sentido contrario, ahora el Tribunal Supremo zanja la cuestión a favor del policía y en contra de la familia McCann.<br /><br />En la sentencia, hecha pública el pasado martes, el Supremo señala que en una situación de conflicto de derechos, entre el honor y la libertad de expresión, “el criterio de ponderación de intereses, actuando según el principio de proporcionalidad y la especificidad del caso, apunta en el sentido de estar la libertad de expresión del reo (Gonçalo Amaral) necesitada de mayor protección”.<br /><br />Según el Tribunal, el ejercicio de libertad de expresión del policía no fue abusivo. “Está dentro de los límites admisibles de una sociedad democrática y abierta, lo que excluye la ilicitud de una eventual lesión del honor de los McCann”.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-23901675528848315352017-02-14T19:24:25.343+00:002017-02-14T19:24:25.343+00:00Yes, indeed. It's just that I don't believ...Yes, indeed. It's just that I don't believe they ever begged for money from their fund to help another cause...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-70250271892163627452017-02-14T18:29:17.217+00:002017-02-14T18:29:17.217+00:00http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/maddie-...http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/maddie-s-dad-s-support-for-dewsbury-family-1-2172449/amp<br /><br />Gerry was happy for their name to be associated with Shannon's family when it suited them!Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-41337334023296124252017-02-14T16:14:57.299+00:002017-02-14T16:14:57.299+00:00http://campaignopposingpolicesurveillance.com/2017...http://campaignopposingpolicesurveillance.com/2017/02/13/union-leaders-call-hogan-howe-explain-shredding/<br /><br />Isn't it time for Hogan Howe to be leaving?<br />Going out on a low? As opposed to a high.<br />Still no news on who will replace him.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-3574431133992103012017-02-14T15:14:38.667+00:002017-02-14T15:14:38.667+00:00I find the whole thing obscene and very hard to be...I find the whole thing obscene and very hard to believe. 'Begging' their own fund for money to help another cause is, in my view, a cock-and-bull story. The McCanns' would do anything - say anything - harm anyone - to stay in the limelight. How THEY are perceived is all that's important. Not a word of a continuing search since when: possibly 8 years ago? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-29418148822081792242017-02-14T10:17:38.267+00:002017-02-14T10:17:38.267+00:00https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2852963/maddie-mccan...https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2852963/maddie-mccanns-parents-anguish-as-shannon-matthews-drama-the-moorside-reveals-they-offered-shamed-mum-karen-financial-support<br /><br />It's on tonight, hence timing of this article.<br /><br />"They were even prepared to beg officials controlling their own public fund to find their daughter to amend strict rules and release some money to aid the search of another missing girl"<br /><br />Who are officials controlling Fund? And why did McCanns need to beg them to give money? To excuse their refusal to help?<br /><br />Or are they controlled by officials?Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-67192127730051698752017-02-13T19:53:56.163+00:002017-02-13T19:53:56.163+00:00https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2852963/maddie-mccan...https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2852963/maddie-mccanns-parents-anguish-as-shannon-matthews-drama-the-moorside-reveals-they-offered-shamed-mum-karen-financial-support/<br /><br />The comments from general public under this article:<br />No body believes the McCanns anymore too many people have learned the truth about the case. When will the media report the fact that the general majority of the public don't believe them!<br /><br />The McCanns need to stop this sham now and come clean, too many people have read the police files and know that Madeleine is dead, many more will find out when Goncalo Amaral's book goes on sale and then what? people are already angry at the injustice and angry at how our corrupt governments and msm have helped and supported these two all down the line. It's utterly despicable as is the waste of 12 million pounds spent on pretending to look for a child who is dead. How can spending such a huge amount of money on a scam be justified? I really hope that the McCanns and all those who helped them cover up a crime are punished and that dear little Madeleine finally gets justice, she deserves that<br /><br />You tube search<br />Madeleine McCann - Sniffer Dogs Eddie and Keela<br /><br />Has this article been written 'again' to incite anti-McCann feeling?<br /><br /><br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-51870190191405771952017-02-13T16:23:31.361+00:002017-02-13T16:23:31.361+00:00https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_M...https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Madeleine_McCann<br /><br />Interesting to see that this Wikipedia page, which has been updated very recently fails to mention that the Portuguese Supreme Justice Court confirmed that the McCanns were never cleared, just saying "the decision was overturned in 2016; the McCanns' appeal to Portugal's Supreme Court failed in 2017"<br /><br />The age progression picture does not fit with the fact that the Portuguese justice system considered as PROVEN FACT that the dogs detected human blood.<br /><br />Also, we think Brenda Leyland deserved a mention by name and not this: "and the following year a Twitter user was found dead from a helium asphyxiation after Sky News confronted her about her McCann tweets."Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-54625619788304122982017-02-12T19:26:08.764+00:002017-02-12T19:26:08.764+00:00RE your last question anon 13.00
Simple..THEY WON...RE your last question anon 13.00<br /><br />Simple..THEY WONT !!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-60309973485940493812017-02-12T09:21:41.847+00:002017-02-12T09:21:41.847+00:00Operation Grange are caught between the rock and h...Operation Grange are caught between the rock and hard place,with a seemingly winding down all that is left is the wording,its clear that the McCann were not exonerated of any involvement in the archiving process,it'll be interesting to see where OG go.A statement along the lines of the Needham case won't satisfy many but how many demonstrations have there been because of their finding's in that.A simple ending with the words along the lines of persons or persons unknown removed Madeleine from apartment 5a leaving no clue as to her whereabouts,whilst this in no way apportions blame nor will it rule any one out of any involvement,yep rock and a hard place imo.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-29575089023075507792017-02-12T01:17:25.448+00:002017-02-12T01:17:25.448+00:00Page 66 really drives home how important they thou...Page 66 really drives home how important they thought the reconstruction was......<br /><br />Those doubts that the investigation intended to see clarified by the reconstitution of the events mentioned in the closing dispatch, an initiative however that was made unfeasible by the witnesses' failure to appear after being summoned to.<br /><br />This speaks volumes imo!!<br /><br />Bampots<br /><br />It is a real slog reading that ......<br /> <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-9486949477647663562017-02-11T21:14:31.951+00:002017-02-11T21:14:31.951+00:00http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Supreme_Court_3...http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Supreme_Court_31_01_2017.htm<br /><br /><br />Translation of Supreme Justice Court complete.<br /><br />A huge thank you to all who collaborated in this!!Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-83634092829612199192017-02-11T20:42:19.641+00:002017-02-11T20:42:19.641+00:00Those police dogs have to be certified on a regula...Those police dogs have to be certified on a regular basis. False negative are forgivable, false positive are eliminatory.Anne A. Corrêa-Guedeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17652561394570212256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-29119257101055912582017-02-11T18:32:18.307+00:002017-02-11T18:32:18.307+00:00What I meant is that indirectly it is saying that ...What I meant is that indirectly it is saying that Eddie may have been mistaken... BUT we know that the training of these dogs ensures that sort of mistake cannot happen. <br /><br />So we have Moorside and Katy Hopkins...possibly all part of the gamesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-62295444142977146382017-02-11T15:48:59.534+00:002017-02-11T15:48:59.534+00:00https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08...https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-websiteAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09860766080102193055noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-20789479073256199932017-02-11T14:34:40.945+00:002017-02-11T14:34:40.945+00:00Thank you Textusa it certainly clarifies it. From ...Thank you Textusa it certainly clarifies it. From previous things you wrote I would have taken it that you thought she was overwhelmed and besides removing the 2 twins portion of the claim generally left it intact for the higher court. Sometimes I read things into it that is not there but like to clarify it rather than let it vester Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com