tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post3719926576360230767..comments2023-10-30T07:28:35.018+00:00Comments on Textusa: The Brit SnitchTextusahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comBlogger30125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-1670288659986745132016-10-13T01:07:13.024+01:002016-10-13T01:07:13.024+01:00The Gaspar statements were for meany reasons sensi...The Gaspar statements were for meany reasons sensitive matter. Why then weren't they suppressed along with all sensitive documents (as the TP7 rogs) ?<br />"As requested" supposes, yes, that Ricardo Paiva had heard of them before, but the request itself isn't in the files. As well the David and Fiona Payne's written answers to LC or PJ questions, though they so strangely differ from their unique 4th of May statements (btw why only one statement ?), didn't motive a request of clarification by RP. Funny.Anne A. Corrêa-Guedeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17652561394570212256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-37947135336715308492016-10-08T10:26:21.426+01:002016-10-08T10:26:21.426+01:00http://www.mccannfiles.com/id18.html
Scroll down f...http://www.mccannfiles.com/id18.html<br />Scroll down for article which refers to a man from T7 under pressure.<br />Lawyer London based.<br />Matt Oldfield lived in London at the time.<br />I think this article at the very end shows pressure being applied to T7.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-52886948223597318162016-10-07T08:24:46.263+01:002016-10-07T08:24:46.263+01:00We would like to make it clear that we have never ...We would like to make it clear that we have never said that the T9 “change-the-mind” meeting ever took place. The point we were making by using its example was to exemplify the very palpable terror campaign against truth about Maddie launched by the entire UK (as in its government, its media, its authorities and legal system).<br /><br />Indeed the PJ Files do not reflect such a meeting ever taking place or even being arranged but that doesn’t mean that there was such an intention about which the participants could have been “convinced” to change their minds about changing their minds and did not even establish any sort of contact with the PJ.<br /><br />This, obviously, is speculation. What is not speculation is the terror set around anything related to Maddie at the time and following years.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-64979421897652497662016-10-07T08:08:45.038+01:002016-10-07T08:08:45.038+01:00T3 who returned on July 11 came for the confrontat...T3 who returned on July 11 came for the confrontation meeting with Murat.<br />There is nothing in PJ files about formally asking to change their statements(although analysis of statements made originally and later reveal contradictions and changes).<br /><br />According to K's book, Silvia Batista was also due to attend, but did not do so.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-71076857928785546162016-10-06T14:03:29.980+01:002016-10-06T14:03:29.980+01:00http://joana-morais.blogspot.pt/2008/06/pj-brought...http://joana-morais.blogspot.pt/2008/06/pj-brought-back-to-portugal-3-of.html<br /><br /><br />3 June 2008<br />PJ Brought Back to Portugal 3 of the McCanns Friends in Secrecy<br /><br /><br />WITNESSES CAME TO THE ALGARVE TO REINFORCE TESTIMONY THAT CONTRADICTS THE MCCANNS<br /><br />Friends are the PJ trumps<br /><br />In a secret visit to Portugal, three persons who had dinner at the Tapas Bar shattered the McCanns and Jane Tanner versions<br /><br />Fiona Payne, her mother Dianne Webster, and the husband David Payne. Are the main trumps of the Public Ministry that will lead the parents of Madeleine McCann, the missing girl, on the 3rd of May of 2007, from an apartment in Praia da Luz, Algarve, to be accused of the crimes of exposition and abandonment since they left the girl alone in that critical night. It is a crime that is punishable up to ten years of prison and allows the respective preventive arrests, like 24horas announced last week.<br /><br />These three witnesses returned to Portugal, on the 11th of July of 2007, in a travel paid by the Portuguese State, and where accommodated in a hotel unity of Portimão. They were still questioned by Gonçalo Amaral’s team, the superior coordinator who was removed from the case, and they contradicted the McCann’s version regarding to what went on in the night of the disappearance.<br /><br />Remember that Kate, Gerry and the other two couples with whom they had dinner, assured that they were taking turns in the vigilance to the children. A fact that was contradicted to the authorities in the above-mentioned secret travel by Fiona Payne and that had already been put in question in two previous statements, given on the days that followed to Maddie's disappearance, by her mother and her husband.<br /><br />Jane Tanner Contradicted<br /><br />“ Fiona Payne gave three statements to the authorities, as well as Matthew Oldfield and his companion, Rachel. Dianne Webster statement [Fiona's mother] was very solid and there was not need of questioning her again”, revealed to 24horas a judicial person in charge connected with the process. In accordance to the same source, “other persons who had dinner with the McCanns - Jane Tanner, her companion, Russell O'Brien, Matthew Oldfield and his wife, Rachel – gave contradictory statements”. And the judicial person in charge exemplifies: "”Jane Tanner always said that she went out from the restaurant to see her oldest daughter. Fiona, David and Dianne guaranteed to the PJ that she never left the restaurant before the alarm was given by Kate. This information was corroborated by several workers of the Tapas Bar restaurant”. These witnesses also stated that Gerry McCann did not even go to check on the children, when he went away of the restaurant, and that he only stayed at the apartment of Praia da Luz entrance.<br /><br />The only person who stayed in Tapas Bar<br /><br />Dianne Webster, of 63 years old, mother of Fiona Payne (36 years), was one of three persons who were available to return to Portugal and to help the authorities in the reconstitution of the facts taken place to the 3rd of May of 2007.<br />She was the only one that was quiet and calm when Kate McCann entered in the Tapas Bar shouting “they’ve taken her!”. The authorities were suspicious of her attitude and she told them that she did not believe in the version of the McCanns. She also pointed out to the PJ that each couple was responsible for their own children and that no one entered in the apartment of the friends[in each other’s apartments].<br /><br />Facts<br />SECRET. The McCann organized a "secret" dinner with all the friends with whom they had dinner with at the Tapas, in the Praia da Luz, Algarve, before the rogatory letters sent for England were carried out.<br /><br />ACCUSATION. The accusation to the McCanns is almost concluded and it should be known before of the 14 of July, the end date for the extended term to incriminate or not the British couple. The judicial authorities are still considering if they will not constitute more arguidos, since the McCann were not the only ones leaving their children alone.<br /><br /><br />Source: 24HorasAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-38804418561415486522016-10-04T10:50:29.009+01:002016-10-04T10:50:29.009+01:00Last night CMTV in Portugal aired a short piece on...Last night CMTV in Portugal aired a short piece on the Maddie “Ghoul Tours”. To show the blog in question, CMTV showed an image of one of its posts about the subject.<br /><br />In the image, it can be seen the word “Textusa” isolated above the text of the post and that it is one of the posts from that blog that are tagged “Textusa”.<br /><br />We are in no way related to that blog, we would like to make that clear. We have no control or opinion about where and how our name is used to tag posts.<br /><br />However, the blog is getting free publicity and a good one as it seems that these tours were a reaction from said blogger in response to our post “Praia da Luz”: <br />http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2015/10/praia-da-luz.html<br /><br />Apparently, so we have been told, he has only written 9 posts on the subject.<br />https://shininginluz.wordpress.com/2015/12/09/madeleine-foot-luz-1/<br />https://shininginluz.wordpress.com/2016/01/04/madeleine-essence-of-luz/ <br />https://shininginluz.wordpress.com/2016/01/08/shininginluz-coming-attractions/<br />https://shininginluz.wordpress.com/2016/01/19/madeleine-the-mccanns-did-it-luz-tour-2/<br />https://shininginluz.wordpress.com/2016/03/06/madeleine-og-tour-march-2016/<br />https://shininginluz.wordpress.com/2016/03/09/madeleine-luz-tour-1-part-1/<br />https://shininginluz.wordpress.com/2016/03/11/madeleine-luz-tour-1-part-2/<br />https://shininginluz.wordpress.com/2016/07/01/madeleine-luz-tour-3/<br />https://shininginluz.wordpress.com/2016/08/12/madeleine-luz-tour-4/Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-69686992471361729432016-10-03T18:25:59.299+01:002016-10-03T18:25:59.299+01:00The content of Anonymous3 Oct 2016, 17:28:00 comme...The content of Anonymous3 Oct 2016, 17:28:00 comment was moved above as readers can see.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-73184187837906794352016-10-03T18:22:29.683+01:002016-10-03T18:22:29.683+01:00Anon 3 Oct 2016, 00:20:00 has placed the response ...Anon 3 Oct 2016, 00:20:00 has placed the response to our comment as a reply to another comment. We have taken the liberty to copy and paste his/her comment and placing it here where it belongs:<br /><br />"Anonymous3 Oct 2016, 17:28:00<br /><br />Thank you for your answers.<br /><br />Please note that I am not, in any way, putting swinging and paedophilia in the same category, just considering the possibility that someone in that group could have engaged in both activities. Arthur Rimbaud was both a great poet and a weapons dealer, two qualities that obviously do not fall in the same category.<br /><br />One strong argument against paedophilia in the Maddie case is that it suggests a murder (involving premeditation), which we certainly agree is implausible. However, I am wondering about the reasons we have to rule out paedophilia without the intention to kill.<br /><br />Regarding "the amount of people we see have witnessed being involved", how many of them knew the exact circumstances in which Madeleine McCann died? Many probably understood that it was a violent death: that did not prevent them from taking part in the cover-up. By doing so, they not only covered up a peccadillo, they also protected manslaughter against a child and obstructed justice at different degrees.<br /><br />That said, I am fully convinced by the main message of your post: that paedophilia was not the big secret to protect. And, frankly, I lean towards your interpretation that the Gaspard statement was a red herring. But I can imagine that the fear of being associated with paedophilia, be it real or not, was among the initial motivations for the cover-up."Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-52497391482094116302016-10-03T17:28:10.163+01:002016-10-03T17:28:10.163+01:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-40757637573742883952016-10-03T17:08:28.851+01:002016-10-03T17:08:28.851+01:00I may be wrong Textusa (apologies if so) but it se...I may be wrong Textusa (apologies if so) but it seems to me that some of those who do not agree with your theory have not understood that a feature of your theory s that the 'other side' wish the finger to be pointed at the T9 and that the T9 are the focus of all attention. That is what they want. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-88667689336199038712016-10-03T15:05:50.022+01:002016-10-03T15:05:50.022+01:00Anonymous 1 Oct 2016, 16:20:00,
About that phone ...Anonymous 1 Oct 2016, 16:20:00,<br /><br />About that phone call, we refer you back to the crux of the post which was why on earth were the Gaspar statements sent to Portugal, if that call was really damning (and under the paedophilia scenario) would the information about it ever have left the UK?<br /><br />What we say is that it wouldn't. Ever.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-4230201653729030282016-10-03T15:02:18.594+01:002016-10-03T15:02:18.594+01:00Anonymous 2 Oct 2016, 14:29:00
Very interesting a...Anonymous 2 Oct 2016, 14:29:00<br /><br />Very interesting article, isn't it?<br /><br />Well, it seems that according to the Mail we only have until Wednesday before we know Grange is closing :)Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-73323594649794463782016-10-03T15:00:32.983+01:002016-10-03T15:00:32.983+01:00Anonymous 3 Oct 2016, 00:20:00,
"Also, if pa...Anonymous 3 Oct 2016, 00:20:00,<br /><br />"Also, if paedophilia was used as a red herring, why was Payne targeted? Why point so close to the truth?"<br /><br />If paedophilia red herring, then targeting Payne wouldn't be anywhere close to the truth.<br /><br />The T9 are not liked by anyone. <br /><br />Not by us because we want the truth out and we know they're lying. Not by their "friends" because it was because of them, T9, that everyone is in the pickle they are. The accidental death happened, in our opinion, within the T9.<br /><br />If we don't like them, the other side even likes them less.<br /><br />It's not everyone doing the T9 favours but the T9 being forced to do the favour of playing the main acting of the absurdity which is the abduction scam.<br /><br />Pointing to Payne, punishes him, sets an example to others and provides a very addictive distraction.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-34269693090909847232016-10-03T14:53:21.035+01:002016-10-03T14:53:21.035+01:00Anonymous 3 Oct 2016, 00:20:00,
For us, it’s prof...Anonymous 3 Oct 2016, 00:20:00,<br /><br />For us, it’s profoundly wrong to put paedophilia and swinging in the same category (we have, unfortunately seen this equivalence being made elsewhere as we pointed out in a previous post.<br /><br />In fact we think one rules the other out.<br /><br />The comparison between both would be the same as comparing baby seal killing with Mount Everest climbing. Both are outdoor activities and similarities end there. The gratifications drawn from either have nothing to do with each other.<br /><br />Could a mountain climber be a baby seal killer? There’s nothing to rule that out, but one thing is certain, if one person happened to be both, when s/he was killing baby seals, s/he wouldn’t be climbing a mountain and vice-versa.<br />Paedophilia is all about dominance and sadism. The victim’s suffering is essential to be present for the perpetrator. And please remember that we would be talking about an infant rapist, a nepiophile.<br /><br />Swinging is all about consent. To understand how important that it is, when one shows interest in another, the reciprocity must exist, explicitly. To put it in simple terms, one shows interest, other welcomes it and reciprocates and both proceed or in case one shows interest and there’s no reciprocation, one just moves along. To insist in any way is very much frowned upon and can even mean being invited to leave.<br /><br />Another significant difference is gender. “Collective” paedophilia, the one which the sadist(s) enjoys to exhibit the victim’s suffering before others, is perpetrated and watched mainly, almost exclusively, by the male gender.<br /><br />In Swinging, there’s a balance between the numbers of participants from both genders, which seems to be the case in Luz at the time.<br /><br />Also the victims of “collective” paedophilia are not related in any way with the perpetrators. They are usually poor children, whose absence won’t be noted and cannot be traced back to the criminals.<br /><br />The paedophile victims of family members suffer their terrible fate in a private manner. These criminals never publicise their actions.<br /><br />For the secret of Luz to be paedophilia, we would be talking of “collective” paedophilia against their own children. Note the plural, as we cannot see any reason, within that scenario, for Maddie to have been singled out, to have been the only victim.<br /><br />Lastly, and most important is the legal aspect.<br /><br />Swinging is subject of social shaming but there are no legal implications.<br /><br />Paedophilia brings also social shaming but it’s a crime. If not the most heinous one committed by a human being.<br /><br />Swinging is a peccadillo, paedophilia a horrible crime.<br /><br />Answering your question very directly, yes, we think that if the crime had been paedophilic there would not be any cover-up. Because there wouldn’t be the amount of people we see have witnessed being involved.<br /><br />One thing is to protect a “white lie” to cover-up a peccadillo, the swinging, which can be understood if one thinks the loss of life in question was accidental and the child’s parents were fine with lying as well, another, completely different, is to lie to cover-up for a 3 yr old having been raped and murdered even if her parents were alright with that lying.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-47055332982401358832016-10-03T00:20:09.485+01:002016-10-03T00:20:09.485+01:00Please let me ask a truly appalling question: do y...Please let me ask a truly appalling question: do you think that if Madeleine McCann died following paedophile acts rather than accidentally, the whole cover up would not have taken place?<br /><br />I am not saying that paedophilia happened (hopefully not!), but I fail to see why it is incompatible with the swinging theory.<br /><br />Also, if paedophilia was used as a red herring, why was Payne targeted? Why point so close to the truth?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-53297607237260242042016-10-02T14:29:30.201+01:002016-10-02T14:29:30.201+01:00McCanns really scraping the barrel in Daily Mail t...McCanns really scraping the barrel in Daily Mail this time:<br />http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3817801/Sick-tour-based-Madeleine-McCann-s-disappearance-takes-customers-apartment-seen-tapas-bar-parents-ate-tragic-night.html Anonymous ex-pat? I think the locals might recognise him and name him! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-77424099420786648452016-10-01T18:33:22.430+01:002016-10-01T18:33:22.430+01:00It has been noted to us, that our reply to Anonymo...It has been noted to us, that our reply to Anonymous 30 Sep 2016, 19:08:00 may seem as attack against Mr Amaral.<br /><br />Nowhere in the post have we criticised Mr Amaral. Nor in the comment.<br /><br />We have said he was the person responsible for the numbering. Of course he was. As the team head, the numbering was but one of his many responsibilities. <br /><br />We are not saying that those numberings are of his handwriting. We’re certain he had clerks to do that for him but the responsibility was his.<br /><br />That means that on Oct 2, he passed that same responsibility to Mr Rebelo, the new team head.<br /><br />Mr Rebelo responsible for all the volumes after that date and so responsible for Volume XIII in which are the Gaspar and Martin related documents. <br /><br />But there’s nothing wrong about the numbering. There was an error, which was detected and appropriately corrected. The integrity of the sequencing did not suffer anything from it.<br /><br />Hope this clarifies things.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-48032384482060667842016-10-01T16:20:13.948+01:002016-10-01T16:20:13.948+01:00Hi Textusa,congratulations on another excellent po...Hi Textusa,congratulations on another excellent post,in regard to doctor David Payne and the Madeleine McCann disappearance,Mr Payne was at odds in his "Mind"about how he had phoned a specific Telephone Number to the UK for reassurance on what was worrying for him at that present moment in time?<br />Was it Dr Payne,who wished to speak"Openly" in 2007? Yet in 2008 when giving a Police statement to DCI 1485 Mesina April 2008,"something that was relevant and Pertinent to the Investigation"but the Police station in the UK wasn't the right time,DCI 1485 Mesina reply,Ok end of Interview?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-9450221055030462832016-09-30T22:42:49.899+01:002016-09-30T22:42:49.899+01:00@19.08
'we think it should be best left to the...@19.08<br />'we think it should be best left to the experts'<br />Who is WE? Is your comment from a team of people or the royal we, as used by the Queen?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-27202196670638603712016-09-30T19:28:48.899+01:002016-09-30T19:28:48.899+01:00Anonymous30 Sep 2016, 19:08:00
"The last thi...Anonymous30 Sep 2016, 19:08:00<br /><br />"The last thing on his mind would be page order"<br /><br />No it wouldn't be the last thing, agree. It would be a permanent thing on his mind. And that of his subordinates.<br /><br />It's a question of working methodology. Like punching the holes on the left side of the page. After a while it becomes a second nature. Otherwise it's a chaos of papers. The investigation moves forward as the documents are appropriately archived, or get appended to the binders.<br /><br />It's naturally chronological. It's not the objective of being chronological. The objective is to keep things organised and easily found when needed.<br /><br />Only you know what the definition of expert is to you.<br /><br />The rest, is your opinion which we must respect even if we don't agree. <br /><br />Opinion is subjective, very hard to debate. Unlike fact, that is quite objective.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-21274017144540307402016-09-30T19:21:25.504+01:002016-09-30T19:21:25.504+01:00https://mobile.twitter.com/K9Truth/status/78189413...https://mobile.twitter.com/K9Truth/status/781894135175405569?p=v<br /><br />Canine Truth – @K9Truth<br />A big shout-out to the girls at TextUsa for their detailed + thorough replies to my earlier tweets. <br /> http://textusa.blogspot.ie/2016/09/the-brit-snitch.html?m=1 …<br />#McCann<br />09:31 - 30 Sept 2016<br /><br /><br />Thank you!Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-82596308086024418742016-09-30T19:08:54.264+01:002016-09-30T19:08:54.264+01:00Anyone in their right mind [when it comes to this ...Anyone in their right mind [when it comes to this complex case] would indeed keep a very open mind. Nothing has been proved, nothing has been set in stone. As it stands, the paedophilia is an option, make of it what you will but it has been thrown into the mix, just like the 'neglect' theory.Without qualified proof of all occuring [or not], there's no reason to debunk it. Picking up on Goncalo Amaral saying the Gaspar statements arrived 'underneath' other papers is perhaps a trifle trivial. The last thing on his mind would be page order, he was incensed on why it took so long for the statements to reach the Portuguese police, I don't believe that would have been his first thought of importance given the circumstances.That said, you do some neat investigative work, but when it comes to trying to debunk some relevant points we think it should be best left to the experts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-74969536921737430462016-09-30T17:00:58.728+01:002016-09-30T17:00:58.728+01:00It was been noted to us that we have not mentioned...It was been noted to us that we have not mentioned the baby bathing issue.<br /><br />That is within the contents of the Gaspar statements, which we didn't analyse in post and will do so on a later date.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-12367883461781738982016-09-30T15:56:22.345+01:002016-09-30T15:56:22.345+01:00Cont.
2. There is nothing to say that the Greek h...Cont.<br /><br />2. There is nothing to say that the Greek holiday is mentioned retrospectively. It is mentioned very clearly within the context of the Majorca holiday. Chapter 9, from where we quoted him, is called exactly that: Majorca September 2005. There can be no doubt Mr Amaral is speaking about this holiday.<br /><br />What we think happened is that when these rumours began, the only holiday that was known (because the T9 mention it in their statements) was the one in Greece. So, then, in mid-July, a ref to something happening in a previous holiday that the group went together, it would be natural to think it was the Greek one, the only one known.<br /><br />3. About the picture known as the make-up picture we don’t wish to speak much about it for reasons we prefer not to reveal. Readers will just have to trust us ion this one when we say it has nothing to do with paedophilia.<br /><br />If it did, we ask the same question we have asked about the Gaspars statements: if paedophilia is the national secret to be protected at all costs, then why would it ever be released?<br /><br />The way we see it, whoever dared to do it (we are talking about a NATIONAL secret) would be very quickly identified and face the same fate of the Brit Snitch, one REALLY very, very unpleasant near, mid and long future.<br /><br /><br /><br />Besides, it seems Twitter K9Truth agrees fully with us:<br /><br />LoveTextusaBlog @LoveTextusa<br />@K9Truth Comments made here are now posted to their blog. I am sure you will receive a reply asap. #mccann<br /><br />Canine Truth @K9Truth <br />@LoveTextusa I see. They are correct to Q the circumstances behind how + why the Gaspar Statements were eventually sent to the PJ. #McCannTextusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-9769322425709357742016-09-30T15:54:58.505+01:002016-09-30T15:54:58.505+01:00Anonymous 30 Sep 2016, 12:21:00
Thank you for the...Anonymous 30 Sep 2016, 12:21:00<br /><br />Thank you for the heads up. Let’s break this into various subjects:<br /><br />1. The site to which K9 refers to is a business, Jacinto&Murat, established in 1972, by João Jacinto and John Murat, Robert’s father. John Murat stopped being a partner of it in 1977, 39 years ago.<br />http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JOAO_JACINTO.htm<br /><br />We think this business we think still exists:<br />http://www.directorio.iol.pt/jacinto-murat-lda--206765.htm<br /><br />It has nothing to do with Robert Murat, so we don’t know why it is even being brought up and suggesting a link between it and paedophilia is not exactly doing it a favour.<br /><br />But we will go one up on K9 and say that paedo keywords were indeed searched by the PJ, in the computers seized from Murat and Malinka, before the Gaspar statements were appended to the files.<br /><br />We spoke of this in our post of April 4, 2014 “Why Swing”:<br />http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2014/04/why-swing.html<br /><br />“On reading them [keywords searched], one immediately understands why all of them are keywords related to the case. All with the exception of 2: “Sophie” and “swing”.<br />In fact we can separate the keywords into 3 major groups:<br />To do with Maddie: “eiddam”, “Mad”, “Madd”, “Maddie”, “Maddy”, “Madel(ale)ine”, “Madelaine”, and “Madeleine”.<br />To do with Murat: “Malinka”, “Murat”, “Robert”, “Robert Murat”, “Serg(ily)”, “Sergei” and “Sergey”.<br />To do with paedophilia: “encomenda”, “kid”, “lolita”, “pack”, “package”, “pacote” and “pedo”.<br />About paedophilia we also noted that all computers were checked for “sexual abuse on minors” having been cleared of that.<br />Two computers returned the word “lolita”: computer “705” related to computer software and computer “987” related to porn sites with “lolita” in their names having been visited.”<br /><br />We have not forgotten about this in our post. We have mentioned it when we said:<br /><br />“The only interest paedophilia had at that time to the investigation was in terms of a possible abduction within a child trafficking crime.<br />Not for a minute was it ever considered, then, that Maddie could have been a victim of such a crime in situ.”<br /><br />The hypothesis of Maddie having been abducted by a paedo ring was public and obvious. If the PJ had then reason to make Robert Murat an arguido, in an investigation about this kind of crime, it is expected for those paedo related keywords to have been searched in the seized computers.<br /><br />All computers seized were cleared. That is said very clearly.<br /><br />The paedophilia this post speaks about is not about an eventual paedo ring but of a paedophile crime that warranted a national cover-up. About that, nothing is mentioned in files, directly or indirectly, before the Gaspar statements were appended.<br /><br />Cont.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.com