tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post3559448721668997415..comments2023-10-30T07:28:35.018+00:00Comments on Textusa: Non-postTextusahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comBlogger88125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-17751867785845872018-01-09T21:36:41.823+00:002018-01-09T21:36:41.823+00:00Hi - sorry to go on about this again ... just read...Hi - sorry to go on about this again ... just read my posts above and realise that I didn't make it clear that the photo I referred to is one of a group of photos of Madeleine that were in Kate and Gerry's room (on what looks like a bedside table). One photo of Madeleine is the one of her at the poolside but alone - no Gerry, Amelie or elbow. Just felt I wanted to make it clear it was a photo in Kate and Gerry's possession that GA included in his book. Thank you and best wishes. Wistlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18142725009334235904noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-23244991508013834222017-10-21T11:10:41.248+01:002017-10-21T11:10:41.248+01:00Apologies for the error - the picture mentioned ab...Apologies for the error - the picture mentioned above is from GA's book, "The Truth of the Lie" and not from Kate's book. Kind regards. WistleWistlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18142725009334235904noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-5873053661459600542017-10-20T22:46:28.948+01:002017-10-20T22:46:28.948+01:00Hello Textusa - I have been looking at a site call...Hello Textusa - I have been looking at a site called mmKnowthetruth and Chapter 17 shows a photograph (from Kate's book, I believe) of a group of different photos of Madeleine. One is the picture of Madeleine as she appears on 'the last photo' but there is no sign of Gerry's elbow which is odd as it appears very close to her head on 'the last photo' ..... there is some background there but no sign of an arm.. (Textusa - I understand if you don't wish to publish my comment with my referring to another blog). Kind regards. WistleWistlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18142725009334235904noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-19879597510547438752017-02-11T17:02:39.198+00:002017-02-11T17:02:39.198+00:00Hello Textusa I love your site. I noticed, on the...Hello Textusa I love your site. I noticed, on the very first photograph on this post, there appears to be a third lens, just above Gerry's head and to the right slightly. It appears as a blue, lens shape in the shrubbery - I think this is further proof of photo shopping, if I'm right! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-78949231103438582962015-11-27T12:01:04.431+00:002015-11-27T12:01:04.431+00:00Textusa, with this new post of yours the Last phot...Textusa, with this new post of yours the Last photo will now die down I think. I think it is important to bring over the results of the 2 polls that CMOMM did regarding the photo:<br /><br />First Poll:<br />http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t12126-textusa-releases-new-statement-6-nov-2015-on-the-last-photo-says-it-is-a-photoshopped-composite-of-three-different-photographs-two-of-which-were-taken-on-friday-18-may-2007<br /><br />Textusa releases new statement (6 Nov 2015) on 'The Last Photo' - says it is a photoshopped composite of THREE different photographs, two of which were taken on Friday 18 May 2007<br />Views: 13,297<br />Replies: 231<br />Last comment by: joyce1938 on Wed Nov 18, 2015 2:27 pm<br /><br />Results:<br />The Last Photo…<br />1. I agree with Textusa; this is a composite of three different photographs, like she says: 31% [ 62 ]<br />2. I don't agree with Textusa but do agree that this photo has been photoshopped in some way:23% [ 46 ]<br />3. I agree with the two experts consulted by PeterMac that the Last Photo is a genuine photograph, and probably taken on Sunday or Monday that week: 36% [ 70 ]<br />4. I have some other explanation for the Last Photo: 1% [ 2 ]<br />5. I don't know: 9% [ 17 ]<br />Total Votes : 197<br /><br />Second poll:<br />http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t12152-textusa-s-revised-theory-published-13-november-of-the-last-photo-explained-for-further-discussion<br /><br />Textusa's revised theory, published 13 November, of The Last Photo - explained for further discussion <br />Views: 11,483<br />Replies: 182<br />Last comment: j.rob on Mon Nov 23, 2015 7:55 pm<br /><br />Results:<br />I've carefully read the explanation of Textusa's Last Photo theory of the composite of 3 images and I think...<br />1. She's right: 58% [ 76 ]<br />2. She's wrong: 32% [ 42 ]<br />3. I don't know: 9% [ 12 ]<br />Total Votes : 130<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-19959853847752776732015-11-25T14:15:55.057+00:002015-11-25T14:15:55.057+00:00Surely it's more than curious to have the SAME...Surely it's more than curious to have the SAME reflected image on sunglasses that are hooked/hanging from Gerry McCann's t-shirt as when said sunglasses are on his nose? Would be nice for the 'experts' to explain that one, please.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-37724579282252206382015-11-24T10:53:53.991+00:002015-11-24T10:53:53.991+00:00http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34904705
** Most sex...http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34904705<br /><br />** Most sex abuse 'in families and missed' **<br />The prevalence of child sexual abuse in England has been vastly underestimated, particularly within families, a Children's Commissioner report suggests.<br /><br />9 is most likely age.<br />Mostly within families.<br />Why in OC would families take their small children for others to abuse?<br />It doesn't make sense. A lot of distressed children. Where would it take place?<br />Paedo ring theory is nonsense.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-31023799021187848032015-11-22T12:37:07.116+00:002015-11-22T12:37:07.116+00:00300 VIPs
http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/...300 VIPs<br />http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/People/article1636051.ece?CMP=OTH-gnws-standard-2015_11_21<br />This shows there's no way SY can cover-up. It comes out in the end, we hope.<br />Not saying Mc case is linked to this in any way - just that when a lot of people are involved, total secrecy is never guaranteed forever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-81224504001782791612015-11-20T14:51:14.713+00:002015-11-20T14:51:14.713+00:00Brilliant stuff Textusa! I suspect "Insane&qu...Brilliant stuff Textusa! I suspect "Insane" must be feeling like Ronda Rousey right now (...)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-48970605627331622342015-11-20T11:46:20.533+00:002015-11-20T11:46:20.533+00:00It seems that for you to prove your point you have...It seems that for you to prove your point you have to sit Gerry (face be the same) with those sunglasses (glasses be the same) to sit on that pool (pool be the same) in April or May (to be same light) next year. Otherwise it's junk.<br />On the other hand they can say it's taken on 29 because there's sunlight.<br />And that it's the original picture is not open for debate because an expert has said there was no tampering on 'a first glance'.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-79795101401524642912015-11-20T09:49:10.840+00:002015-11-20T09:49:10.840+00:00Good. Keep it up, Textusa Sisters. Look forward to...Good. Keep it up, Textusa Sisters. Look forward to your posts every week. <br />1,682,322 views surely mean your blog is a reference for information. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-75319001336841663442015-11-20T09:17:43.047+00:002015-11-20T09:17:43.047+00:00This post has been very revealing - - not simply t...This post has been very revealing - - not simply through it's content, which I have to say is excellent (as expected from you) but especially through the reactions to it. Very revealing! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-11257507820378092242015-11-20T07:54:04.470+00:002015-11-20T07:54:04.470+00:00Very good point Daisy!
The blue can either be the...Very good point Daisy!<br /><br />The blue can either be the sky or the water. It makes no sense being the sky. If the water the rippling is also impossible.<br /><br />All makes sense when one rotates the glasses to the vertical position.<br /><br />Thank you!Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-6629564757390529512015-11-19T22:48:49.504+00:002015-11-19T22:48:49.504+00:00I agree to the physical impossibility of the refle...I agree to the physical impossibility of the reflection. <br /><br />The blue parts of the lenses, whether these are sky or pool water reflections shows ripples in the vertical, which is NOT possible.<br />daisyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05629358592672607097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-36153257898600753722015-11-19T21:05:37.912+00:002015-11-19T21:05:37.912+00:00Anonymous 19 Nov 2015, 18:04:00,
When criticised ...Anonymous 19 Nov 2015, 18:04:00,<br /><br />When criticised by the wise, worry; when by fools, smile.<br /><br />“When you judge others, you do not define them, you define yourself”<br />― Earl Nightingale<br />Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-81123773374441527192015-11-19T18:04:00.280+00:002015-11-19T18:04:00.280+00:00It's interesting that this photoshopped discus...It's interesting that this photoshopped discussion is now being used to try and undermine virtually all of Textusa's blogs. I find it cowardly in the extreme. On the one hand, Textusa is accused of not being 'scientific' enough. Then this is used to dismiss other postings on a hunch!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-16889870722538165472015-11-19T17:48:51.539+00:002015-11-19T17:48:51.539+00:00Read it here:
http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t1...Read it here: <br />http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t12152p160-textusa-s-revised-theory-published-13-november-of-the-last-photo-explained-for-further-discussion<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-42016999049183480572015-11-19T16:36:05.790+00:002015-11-19T16:36:05.790+00:00Anonymous 19 Nov 2015, 16:29:00,
Could you please...Anonymous 19 Nov 2015, 16:29:00,<br /><br />Could you please provide a link to where this is from?Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-61189159689869161622015-11-19T16:29:17.995+00:002015-11-19T16:29:17.995+00:00“Reading back through it I was wrong on my theory ...“Reading back through it I was wrong on my theory of polarised glasses causing what I thought at the time was a rotated reflection. I am kicking myself now for not realising the real cause for the reflection and it seems so flaming obvious now when considering how the reflection would look with curved glasses and curved pool as demonstrated in the youtube video. Those who still doubt, consider this: If there was a flat mirror in place of Gerry's left lens, how would the reflection of the curved pool look? Yes, it would appear to curve away to the right from our point of view looking at the mirror. Now think about a curved lens and a straight edged pool... yes, it would still appear curved because the reflection of the curved lens would affect the straight line of the pool edge reflection. Now add the two together and what do you get? Curved edge, curved pool... voila.”<br /><br />Seriously?? A curve to the left on a mirror is reflected curving to the right? SERIOUSLY???Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-45516798894765170542015-11-19T09:07:06.511+00:002015-11-19T09:07:06.511+00:0020:07
Do you think Darren Ware's video is cre...20:07 <br />Do you think Darren Ware's video is credible?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-41831448836547771552015-11-18T23:39:01.154+00:002015-11-18T23:39:01.154+00:00@20:07
Exactly the point about Newton.
Why is the ...@20:07<br />Exactly the point about Newton.<br />Why is the photo of G's sunglasses the only evidence provided so far as the evidence? Where are the other photographs of people wearing sunglasses which demonstrate this repeatable phenomenon?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-55939050021833983722015-11-18T22:54:25.315+00:002015-11-18T22:54:25.315+00:00When is Nottextusa - not Textusa? When he's p...When is Nottextusa - not Textusa? When he's pretending to be someone else, but the 'style' gives him away.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-21831911072677558182015-11-18T20:07:16.629+00:002015-11-18T20:07:16.629+00:00Oh by all means continue to make a fool of yoursel...Oh by all means continue to make a fool of yourself, you are doing awfully well on that score, but I thought the point of you accepting comments was so that people could debate the point ? You claim to welcome debate and corrections if you make a mistake, but in fact anyone doing so is met with barely-concealed hostility. It would be one thing if you claimed that your theory is built on opinion, but if you claim a factual, scientific basis to it, then you should accept that leaves it open to challenge. Your rather snide remark about Newton and the apple is interesting, as you seem incapable of realising that his observation is capable of being tested and of giving reproducible results. Your attempt to do so with your observation was completely flawed.<br />I realise you generally preach to the already-converted, but the danger of trying to disseminate your message to a wider audience is that your wider audience is a touch more intelligent than your regular one, and less likely to fall for your guff.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-44449269795811998132015-11-18T19:06:41.671+00:002015-11-18T19:06:41.671+00:00It seems to us that if we were so wrong you would ...It seems to us that if we were so wrong you would be begging for us to continue and make fools of ourselves instead of asking for us to stop.<br /><br />One would be mislead to think you care about us.<br /><br />By the way, as one cannot replicate Newton's experience with the original apple, does that mean to you that there's no gravity?Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-56865689639621331832015-11-18T18:00:02.950+00:002015-11-18T18:00:02.950+00:00Verbal bullying? How is asking you to please stop ...Verbal bullying? How is asking you to please stop using fraudulent comparisons, bullying? Which language do you intend to censor - the language that says you are wrong? I object most strongly to that accusation. It seems designed to throw up a smokescreen for you to hide behind.<br /><br />You made a comparison and expect people to draw a conclusion using filmed footage of a different pair of sunglasses, shot from an entirely different angle and distance, in a moving vehicle. How are they supposed to draw a conclusion which the comparison is completely invalid?<br /><br />As regards your closing sentence, I literally have no idea what you are talking about. I assume you have confused me with someone else.<br /><br />Look, I really don't care what fairy story you want to make up, but it's completely dishonest to pretend there is any factual or scientific basis to your claims when there simply isn't. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com