tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post3132952180491929346..comments2023-10-30T07:28:35.018+00:00Comments on Textusa: Every dog has its dayTextusahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comBlogger24125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-52559080648945600002016-04-19T08:18:11.942+01:002016-04-19T08:18:11.942+01:00What has happened to Nicola Wall?
She arrived in a...What has happened to Nicola Wall?<br />She arrived in a blaze of glory based on past achievements amidst much lauding and fanfare.<br />Top Cop!<br />Catches criminals faster than the speed of light!<br />Fresh , New energy. <br />Confident and assertive.<br />Smart and sassy.<br />Yet, she has disappeared from public view in the case, has been a silent entity and indeed in this article, she is very notable by her absence !<br />One is aware that the police are not going to comment on this ongoing "investigation", but how strange her absence from this article.<br />The last incumbent was forever in the media, spouting gobbledygook.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-39675162309936481492016-04-19T00:15:49.441+01:002016-04-19T00:15:49.441+01:00This is your blog. It is your prerogative to censo...This is your blog. It is your prerogative to censor anyone whom you perceive as disagreeing with you. Myself included.<br /><br />Feel free to ignore Clarence Mitchell's connections at the highest levels of the British Establishment.<br /><br />The truth is that "Mickey Mouse" has been a key element ("errand boy" or otherwise) right from the inception of this cover-up. <br /><br />You only need to analyse his professional track and/or talk (off the record) with some media "insiders" to confirm that.<br /><br />It is common knowledge Clary has played an important role (and still does) in the (ideological) dynamics of this cover-up. <br /><br />Incidentally, do you have any evidence, names etc. to think otherwise? <br /><br />Ah! I thought so, darling! <br /><br />Good night and good luck!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-52055074050279381762016-04-18T21:30:08.095+01:002016-04-18T21:30:08.095+01:00Anonymous 18 Apr 2016, 18:13:00,
The mention of a...Anonymous 18 Apr 2016, 18:13:00,<br /><br />The mention of alive was given headlines but not the mention of murder which he also speaks of.<br /><br />Mixed messages: “There is ongoing work. There is always a possibility that we will find Madeleine and we hope that we will find her alive” and “there is a missing girl and if she has been murdered and if we think we have got justifiable and reasonable lines of inquiry to pursue then they should be dealt with.”<br /><br />SY has to peddle she may still be alive to get money. Public won't stand for spending on search for dead body.<br /><br />What else could he say?<br /><br />That they thought she was dead? That they needed more money to find out what happened to her remains?<br /><br />Sensibly, what he said means future funding more likely to be given. That’s why in the para where he speaks of hope of her being alive that he speaks of money: “There is ongoing work. There is always a possibility that we will find Madeleine and we hope that we will find her alive. That’s what we want and that’s what the family and the public want and that is why the Home Office continue to fund it. There is work that needs to be done still.”<br /><br />The article confirms what we said in our post “Six months to find Maddie?”:<br /><br />“I imagine that if we have not completed our inquiries within six months we will go back to the Home Office and ask for more money” or, we will go on until Lisbon court decides.<br /><br />To be noted, two things.<br /><br />One, both scenarios, alive OR dead, are still options<br /><br />Two, it is “Detective Chief Superintendent Mick Duthie, the head of the Yard’s homicide squad” who speaks. The article says “Mr Duthie, who is in overall charge of the investigation Operation Grange”. <br /><br />We believe Mick Duthie may be Nicola Wall's line manager, who isn't even mentioned in the article.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-31050567303717109582016-04-18T18:13:32.630+01:002016-04-18T18:13:32.630+01:00Sorry - I do not really get the motive for the pus...Sorry - I do not really get the motive for the push to make people believe she is alive...who is pushing this 'alive' suggestion? What is the strategy behind it...and whose strategy is it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-79113100617501249492016-04-18T16:29:44.644+01:002016-04-18T16:29:44.644+01:00Anonymous 18 Apr 2016, 16:01:00,
We ask you to ta...Anonymous 18 Apr 2016, 16:01:00,<br /><br />We ask you to take elsewhere comments glorifying Clarence Mitchell in this affair. <br /><br />We think he's a nobody, has no voice and absolutely no manipulation capability. <br /><br />In our opinion, he was paid to play a role and he played quite feebly. He has the a say in this script as much as any other third-rate actor has in a production, which, we repeat ourselves, is none.<br /><br />For us it's completely irrelevant whether he sleeps or doesn't because irrelevant people matter nothing.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-6216470776962650132016-04-18T16:01:02.889+01:002016-04-18T16:01:02.889+01:00; ) Do bear in mind Clarence Mitchell - Head of El...; ) Do bear in mind Clarence Mitchell - Head of Election Media Monitoring, based at Conservative Campaign HQ, during the 2010 UK General Election and the McCanns' "reputation manager" never sleeps ... <br /><br />May be "Mickey Mouse" is anticipating a Portuguese appellate court ruling on his clients behalf pretty soon. Who knows...<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-72792381556666857922016-04-18T15:48:47.483+01:002016-04-18T15:48:47.483+01:00We placed a comment on our post “Third Option” rec...We placed a comment on our post “Third Option” recommending readers to follow closely the Brazilian political situation:<br /><br />“Textusa16 Mar 2016, 15:11:00<br /><br />We recommend that readers follow attentively what is going on right now in Brasil, with former President Lula da Silva being appointed minister simply to ensure he has judicial immunity.<br /><br />http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-35808706”<br /><br />We are a rigorously apolitical blog (we refer to politics solely when it pertains directly the Maddie case) and our recommendation had to do solely with the fact that the President Dilma Rousseff had nominated Lula da Silva as minister so he would avoid being prosecuted for corruption.<br /><br />Yesterday, the Brazilian Chamber of Members of Parliament (Câmara de Deputados) passed the 2/3 vote needed for the procedure to impeach the President to go forward – it will now go to the Brazilian Senate where a simple majority can make that impeachment a reality.<br /><br />We will not give here our opinion about what may have moved the President to make that nomination, nor about how the various political parties took advantage of the popular outrage to benefit their own interests.<br /><br />Dilma’s supporters call it a coup-d’état against democracy and the constitution, her opposition call it a significant step against corruption. We will not give our opinion on who we think is right although we think we won’t damage our apolitical position by saying we think neither are.<br /><br />The point we want to make is to have some people in the UK answer the following question: if Dilma Rousseff hadn’t made that just-a-little-too-much of nomination would she be in the position she is after last night?<br /><br />We think not. We think the reality has proved in Brazil that there are limits that those in power have to abide by, under the penalty that they will lose control of the situation.<br /><br />Talking about the nomination and the nomination alone, of what “a little-too-much” was Rousseff’s fault? Sometimes there aren’t words that can express exactly what is meant to say although we know exactly what we want to say. A mix of arrogance, petulance and shamelessness. But we prefer that our readers and those who we have addressed the question to define for themselves what too much of what it was she did.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-18030048180503965512016-04-18T14:05:45.175+01:002016-04-18T14:05:45.175+01:00http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/madeleine-mcc...http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/madeleine-mccann-detective-we-still-hope-to-find-her-alive-a3227561.html<br /><br />It is nice to be proved correct on our 6 months to find Maddie post.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-10254014660743911932016-04-17T15:12:19.330+01:002016-04-17T15:12:19.330+01:00Addenda:
Sniffer dogs are like us - like everyone...Addenda:<br /><br />Sniffer dogs are like us - like everyone else.<br /><br />Some are good (well-trained or educated) others pretty good; others not so good; and so on. <br /><br />Eddie and Keela were good. Pretty good. Very good. The Sherlock Holmes of sniffer dogs you might say.<br /><br />So good they were in great demand by the FBI in the USA. They were quite simply "the best sniffer dogs in the world" (quote). <br /><br />References:<br /><br />The original "The Times" article is only available for subscribers but for a taster see the link below:<br /><br />http://dogsdontlie.com/main/2005/12/on-scent-of-success-sniffer-dog-keela-earns-more-than-her-chief-constable/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-90423497315899950902016-04-16T14:32:05.500+01:002016-04-16T14:32:05.500+01:00If you think of this news as being old rubbish - w...If you think of this news as being old rubbish - why is it so important to you to repeat the link to it? <br /><br />...probably it has something to do with the fact that the last postings took a different direction bringing back the focus of the discussion to the need of having the whole truth coming out (as it usually does in my opinion, sooner or later)? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-71004910766108996002016-04-15T23:36:36.173+01:002016-04-15T23:36:36.173+01:00Confirming my suspicions that the "news"...Confirming my suspicions that the "news" story a couple of days ago about the sniffer dogs in Manchester airport was a planted load of old rubbish. They could have at least released it on April 1st to give it a slight angle of credibility............<br /><br />http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/14/airport-sniffer-dogs-manchester-cheese-and-sausages-not-drugsanonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15781309983033824518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-81420129081291468082016-04-15T21:57:38.520+01:002016-04-15T21:57:38.520+01:00So why is it so hard for DC to take a decision reg...So why is it so hard for DC to take a decision regarding the resolution? Surely he needs to take a step away and see this as an eagle would see it, soaring high above. He was elected as our PM - to make the right decisions. The truth WILL come out sooner or later, no matter what. To let this drag on much longer is unwise and unjust.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-68776641695996201782016-04-15T21:37:17.510+01:002016-04-15T21:37:17.510+01:00Anonymous 15 Apr 2016, 20:42:00,
This ridiculous ...Anonymous 15 Apr 2016, 20:42:00,<br /><br />This ridiculous farce will go on forever. Forever as in many generations to come, and as it is a hoax of monumental proportions and scope involving the death of a little girl, we guess it will be remembered for centuries in the future.<br /><br />THAT is what the other side must realise. They must realise the memory of this will last, last and last. What they also must realise is that it's in their hands of what this memory will consist of. If and how it was solved and who helped solve it.<br /><br />The memory of all involved, in a good or a bad way, will be attached to the perdurable memory of this affair.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-91094602934809939782016-04-15T20:42:08.330+01:002016-04-15T20:42:08.330+01:00"How much longer is this ridiculous farce set..."How much longer is this ridiculous farce set to continue?"... sums it up for me - true and tragic <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-32822367174713166892016-04-15T16:00:03.613+01:002016-04-15T16:00:03.613+01:00Guardian article:
Manchester airport dogs detected...Guardian article:<br />Manchester airport dogs detected 181 kg of illegal meat, £28 k cash, 3 occasions illegal drugs as well as cigarettes and tobacco.<br />Dogs did make discoveries!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-29504803824158301272016-04-15T15:49:19.191+01:002016-04-15T15:49:19.191+01:00That report was misleading!
Many countries are mu...That report was misleading! <br />Many countries are much more concerned about people bringing in plant diseases than drugs and as you say few people would try to smuggle drugs this way so trained drug dogs would be a huge cost for little return. I know you can't bring in uncooked meats too so the dogs used for these two things have nothing to do with drug dogs. Drug dogs would be far more useful at ferry ports than airports.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-33012633279538356362016-04-15T14:48:58.853+01:002016-04-15T14:48:58.853+01:00Isabel's post is absolutely spot on !Isabel's post is absolutely spot on !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-25919387226747836962016-04-15T13:53:11.844+01:002016-04-15T13:53:11.844+01:00The dogs always have and always will clinch it or ...The dogs always have and always will clinch it or me.aurora68https://www.blogger.com/profile/08655133595672969261noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-34194518952230242472016-04-15T13:34:33.770+01:002016-04-15T13:34:33.770+01:00I know for a fact that drug dogs don't alert t...I know for a fact that drug dogs don't alert to food. I'm a retired schoolteacher and once taught in a problematic neighbourhood where drug dogs were once brought into the classroom. I said to the handler that I had a sandwich in my bag. He said the interest the dog showed in the sandwich wouldn't make him alert. He would only alert if he found drugs.<br />Which he didn't, of course!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-85242478066578502792016-04-15T13:24:29.109+01:002016-04-15T13:24:29.109+01:00I don't see how the report in media re the dog...I don't see how the report in media re the dogs will in anyway compromise the sniffer dogs. The dog who detected Food products is trained to detect illegal animal products, hence it found what it was trained to find. Food stuff.<br /><br />Some consignments of Viagra were also found, meaning that the drug sniffer dogs clearly are alerting to drugs and detecting what they should .<br /><br />It all has to do with the readers' attention span as well as not being lazy and reading the article rather than just the headline.<br /><br />"But one dog, trained to detect illegal animal products, often found “small amounts of cheese or sausages” carried by holidaymakers, the report said."<br /><br />AS for not detecting heroin or cocaine, well there simply wasn't any to detect. That is quite simple and evident. Maybe Manchester airport is not a preferred drug route, who knows. OR maybe they are trying to cut costs and reduce the dog "squad" that is what it reads like to me.<br /><br />Supply and demand. There are not enough drugs going through the airport - there is no reason to deploy so many dogs.... Sadly , bad thinking. Traffickers as any others study their market. Should the use of dogs be reduced, there will be then a high demand to traffick via Manchester Airport.<br /><br />http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/14/airport-sniffer-dogs-manchester-cheese-and-sausages-not-drugs<br /><br />Isabel Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-18464250304377302072016-04-15T12:41:26.815+01:002016-04-15T12:41:26.815+01:00Regarding airport dogs, who in their right mind wo...Regarding airport dogs, who in their right mind would attempt to smuggle class A drugs through a UK airport these days, given the tight security because of terrorist threats?<br />Only someone very desperate. People using drugs at a personal level will buy them at their destination. Large scale consignments now likely to arrive by lorries through ports and shipping containers.<br />2 different types of search dog are conflated in this report - food and drug dogs.<br />Food detecting dogs are there to find illegal products, like bush meat. People probably don't try and smuggle it in, as used to be more common, if tight security now in place.<br />The point of having dogs in place, like having speed traps on motorways, is surely to deter the behaviour.<br />If the deterrence - the tight security, the dogs - is removed, the activities, smuggling and terrorist attacks, will return.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-5715242774079847042016-04-15T10:30:26.774+01:002016-04-15T10:30:26.774+01:00The Guardian Report also states: “A senior manager...The Guardian Report also states: “A senior manager agreed that there was a lack of innovation in the use of the dogs and told us that a new management structure was being put into place to take a fresh look at their deployment,” the report said. <br />It goes on to mention mistakes in nearly all departments. No mention of baggage inspectors finding any drugs. Criticism seems to be about border controls - an obsession in UK. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-48885733932697858232016-04-15T10:06:45.179+01:002016-04-15T10:06:45.179+01:00Nobody with an IQ above 1 takes any notice of mr t...Nobody with an IQ above 1 takes any notice of mr twitters ramblings. The british public who look further than what the mccann media machine and their well connected helpers push out know that 1. The dogs are correct and 2. The case stinks to high heaven of more than the death of a young child.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-20227358423351311292016-04-15T09:57:57.418+01:002016-04-15T09:57:57.418+01:00Dogs don't and can't lie.
Interesting tha...Dogs don't and can't lie.<br /><br />Interesting that Textusa chooses the dogs and their evidence as a subject for this week's blog.<br />Yesterday, in the UK press there was an article online declaring that airport sniffer dogs failed to detect heroin but plenty of cheese and sausages!<br />These findings have been reproduced in several newspapers today.<br />The survey was conducted at Manchester Airport between November 2014 to June 2015<br />No Class A drugs were detected but plenty of cheese and sausages from returning travellers !<br />One wonders surely why the dogs failed to detect such drugs? could it possibly be that there simply weren't any to be found during the period of study?<br />That's the most logical explanation for me!<br />That summation is not commented upon however, reporting concentrating on the dog's failings !<br />No doubt, Team McCann Will have a field day with this report and it's interesting that it has suddenly appeared out of the blue into the UK Media !<br />Of course, the McCanns fear the dogs and their evidence. Gerry did his utmost to ridicule and dismiss them!<br />One does that out of fear!<br />"Ask the dogs Sandra!"<br />The McCanns would have us believe that human interpretation of the dogs' findings is at fault.<br />This is what we, the public have been fed, that the dogs are unreliable, the dogs were 'handler led'.<br />This, despite the wealth of evidence Eddie and Keela provided and which Textusa documents above, based on the PJ Files.<br />Whichever way one looks at it, the evidence returns to the McCanns.<br />Kate's cadaver reeking trousers, the key fob, the apartment, three amongst many.<br />How much longer is this ridiculous farce set to continue?<br />The people are getting restless for justice.<br />Justice for a little girl, Madeleine.<br />Shame on all those who have taken part in the cover up!<br />Shame on thoe who advised, aided and abetted in this Abduction Hoax.<br />Shame on those who do their utmost to discredit the role that dogs play in helping to solve the most stubborn of crimes.<br /><br />The exoneration of the McCanns would be a crime in itself and would never be accepted by the public at this stage of the game.<br />It will be very interesting to see what transpires.<br /><br />http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/14/airport-sniffer-dogs-manchester-cheese-and-sausages-not-drugs<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com