tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post1821803100978414557..comments2023-10-30T07:28:35.018+00:00Comments on Textusa: Squaring The CircleTextusahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comBlogger50125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-76423424063298958952012-02-24T19:38:24.341+00:002012-02-24T19:38:24.341+00:00http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-ea...http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-17142957<br /><br />The Spanniels( CSI dogs) used on a murder trial, for Mccann's nightmares.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-536799214156158382012-02-24T16:54:10.217+00:002012-02-24T16:54:10.217+00:00No matter where Gerry and Jez where positioned in ...No matter where Gerry and Jez where positioned in the street, there was no way for them to not noticing the guy saw by Jane. Remember the shoes described by her and the type of pavement? A guy wearing such shoes and carrying a child in such uncomfortable position will be waking up the all neighbors. Turning the head into a strange noise is an innate reaction. Nor Gerry or Jez could control that reaction.<br /> All the 3 lied about been on that street at the same time and sawing nothing. <br /> Most probably Jane and Gerry were there and Jane saw Gerry carrying away her daughter in a direction that somebody could see him. Opposite Murat's house. Jez was the BH added to give an alibi for Gerry. That alibi just works if the dinner has any leg to be true. Imagine if the dinner was a lie, Jez keeps Gerry close to the crime scene just before the Smiths had seen him carrying a girl. Well done BHs, the circle is being closed and you all trapped by your own mouths.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-79726714319782910262012-02-24T16:30:17.089+00:002012-02-24T16:30:17.089+00:00From the latest post of Pat brown on her blog. Abo...From the latest post of Pat brown on her blog. About Jane Tanner:<br />..."Jane says she walked right up to them and passed them. Jeremy Wilkins says he never saw her or the man. Gerry says he never saw her or the man which he must say or he has to call Wilkins a liar. I think he solves this problem by moving their location to the opposite side of the road where it is possible for them to both have not seen Jane or any man with a child. Then he doesn’t have to go up against Wilkins, but merely state he remembers where they were standing a bit differently.<br /><br />It is Kate who sums the whole situation up quite interestingly in her book, Madeleine.<br /><br />Either way, exactly where they were standing is not crucial. What may be important is that all three of them were there.<br /><br />Indeed! What is important is all three of them were there. What does it really matter if all three of them are there? What does it matter if Jane Tanner saw the man five minutes later when she returned and neither man was on the street? It matters because Jeremy Wilkins gives Gerry an alibi. No, not Jane. Jane Tanner is not that useful in giving Gerry an alibi because she is one of the Tapas 9. Jeremy Wilkins is the LAST UNBIASED WITNESS who saw Gerry before Madeleine was found missing and before the Smiths’ 9:50-9:55 sighting of a man carrying a little child toward the beach.<br /><br />No one outside the Tapas 9 can verify that Gerry returned to the table after his 9:15 check on his children or that he remained at the table until Kate gave the alarm. Jeremy Wilkins, being with Gerry at the time Jane sees “the abductor carrying off a child,” gives Gerry an airtight alibi for the only time that he can get one for that evening during that time frame."<br /><br />Interesting. Is Pat Brown believing the dinner happen and the negligence too? I don't think so. Slowly she will present her conclusions. Not a good time for all BHs who decide to help on the crowd and remain in silence for so long.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-74029640108928472782012-02-24T16:21:43.983+00:002012-02-24T16:21:43.983+00:00L, you have a point. We haven't written anythi...L, you have a point. We haven't written anything on it. It could be open for discussion in a soon to be published post. (sorry readers, this a response to a DO NOT PUBLISH comment)Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-44229457082896843772012-02-24T15:03:14.020+00:002012-02-24T15:03:14.020+00:00If Goncalo Amaral is a wolf by the ears, Paul Dacr...If Goncalo Amaral is a wolf by the ears, Paul Dacre could be a tiger by the tail<br /><br />(my meaning is his paper will make mincemeat of the McCanns if he ever gets the opportunity, after his humiliation at Leveson)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-13978638883542148962012-02-24T10:05:04.999+00:002012-02-24T10:05:04.999+00:00Desculpe Textusa, acho que enviei para aqui um com...Desculpe Textusa, acho que enviei para aqui um comentario que dizia respeito ao Post de Filomena Teixeira. Peco desculpa pelo erro. <br /> Tambem me incomodou a entrevista do Afonso.<br /> Bjs e bom dia para voces.<br /> Espero que alguem publique a entrevista de Pat Brown no Algarve, na net.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-23665445149344123342012-02-24T09:59:56.753+00:002012-02-24T09:59:56.753+00:00Comecaram as duvidas na minha cabeca, tambem em re...Comecaram as duvidas na minha cabeca, tambem em relacao a este caso. Como eu desejo que se dissipem depressa. Este sim, parece-me nao ser um caso Tao simples de perceber quanto o de Madeleine. <br /> Definitivamente, o caso McCann mudou a perspectiva com que olho para todos os desaparecimentos de criancas, agora. Ha as que desaparecem porque assim o desejam e nestas cai a faixa etaria dos adolescentes e jovens adultos. E ha as que sao feitas desaparecer, quando a sua idade ainda nao lhes permite uma autonomia de escolha. Enfim, nada mais sera como dantes e eu espero sinceramente, em relacao ao Rui Pedro, nao ter andado 13 anos a acreditar numa mentira.<br /> Infelizmente, a Historia ja nos mostrou que ha mentiras muito bem representadas e com o passar dos anos Passam a ser vividas, como se de verdades se tratassem. <br /> Acho que alguma parte de Portugal, esta como eu hoje, angustiada e cheia de duvidas. <br /> Que a sorte ajude estas criancas e ajude a policia a clarificar o que lhes aconteceu.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-63875565730202182152012-02-24T08:53:40.117+00:002012-02-24T08:53:40.117+00:00Post deleted, as explained, from the Filomena Teix...Post deleted, as explained, from the Filomena Teixeira post, and placed here:<br /><br />"http://www.mccannfiles.com/id405.html<br /><br />The above link details where some of the fraudulent mccann fund money has gone, and its not gone on any searching!<br /><br />SY need to leave no stone unturned in their investigation of the mccanns.<br /><br />Feb 23, 2012 1:27:00 PM"Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-75385698967519054442012-02-24T08:49:08.804+00:002012-02-24T08:49:08.804+00:00Post deleted, as explained, from the Filomena Teix...Post deleted, as explained, from the Filomena Teixeira post, and placed here:<br /><br />"Joana Morais left that comment on her blog:<br /><br />"Read Pat Brown's latest post Criminal Profiling Topic of the Day: How Jane Tanner got Lost in a Crowd on an Empty Street «It is Kate who sums the whole situation up quite interestingly in her book, Madeleine.<br /><br />Either way, exactly where they were standing is not crucial. What may be important is that all three of them were there.<br /><br />Indeed! What is important is all three of them were there. What does it really matter if all three of them are there? What does it matter if Jane Tanner saw the man five minutes later when she returned and neither man was on the street? It matters because Jeremy Wilkins gives Gerry an alibi. No, not Jane. Jane Tanner is not that useful in giving Gerry an alibi because she is one of the Tapas 9. Jeremy Wilkins is the LAST UNBIASED WITNESS who saw Gerry before Madeleine was found missing and before the Smiths’ 9:50-9:55 sighting of a man carrying a little child toward the beach.» http://patbrownprofiling.blogspot.com/2012/02/criminal-profiling-topic-of-day-how.html<br /><br />A wolf by the ears at The Blacksmith Bureau «Welcome to the world of the McCanns’ Portuguese libel claims. Spin and lies are at the heart of them, as they have been since the very beginning; only now, three and a half years after the case was archived, can we see that gradually but inexorably the legal system has begun to catch up with the couple: spin has encountered the courts and the courts are winning.» http://blacksmithbureau.blogspot.com/2012/02/wolf-by-ears.html<br /><br />And an absolute must-read at the McCann files «Madeleine's Fund - Review & Investigation of Accounts | The official launch of 'Madeleine's Fund: Leaving No Stone Unturned Limited' on 16 May 2007<br />Enid O'Dowd takes an in depth look into the setting up and subsequent running of Madeleine's Fund: Leaving No Stone Unturned Limited - A review of the background to setting up the limited company Madeleine's Fund: Leaving No Stone Unturned and a forensic examination of the company accounts» http://www.mccannfiles.com/id405.html"<br /><br />Post" American criminal profiler .... Mccann's mystery"<br /><br />Feb 24, 2012 1:18:00 AM"Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-11523244783408872282012-02-23T10:51:25.117+00:002012-02-23T10:51:25.117+00:00I see the ridiculous Spanish sighting piece in the...I see the ridiculous Spanish sighting piece in the Olive Press has been removed. Who on earth thought putting that in the media was a good idea? Unless to show how ubbelievable all sighting are by inventing even more incredible stories.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-69485452274643629772012-02-23T08:55:44.809+00:002012-02-23T08:55:44.809+00:00Anon Feb 23, 2012 8:50:00 AM
Thank you for your &...Anon Feb 23, 2012 8:50:00 AM<br /><br />Thank you for your "We were always one step ahead", because it shows how you feel part of this wonderful family. That was always one of the main objectives of the blog. Thank you.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-5615808203429642602012-02-23T08:50:17.000+00:002012-02-23T08:50:17.000+00:00Textusa
On MMF they’re discussing here your http...Textusa<br /><br />On MMF they’re discussing here your http://textusa.blogspot.com/2012/01/fancy-meeting-you-here.html:<br />http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t19121-the-exeter-connection-and-other-coincidences<br /><br />On JH they’re discussing here your http://textusa.blogspot.com/2010/10/mistaken-identities.html:<br />http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t4418-did-madeleine-sleep-in-the-bed-they-say-she-did<br /><br />We were always one step ahead. It’s taking time for people to come around and understand how right you’ve always been!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-88287649394116427532012-02-23T00:25:50.867+00:002012-02-23T00:25:50.867+00:00With your permission Textusa - the following:
htt...With your permission Textusa - the following:<br /><br />http://www.mccannfiles.com/id129.html<br />Report of PJ discards abduction theory Correio da Manhã<br /> <br />05 July 2008<br />Translation by Joana Morais <br /> <br /><br />Snip<br /><br />"KATE JUSTIFIES DEATH ODOUR<br /> <br />Kate McCann didn't negate the fact that her two pieces of clothes and the stuffed animal had been signalled by the English dogs trained to find cadaver odor and justified it by her profession. Madeleine's mother alleged that as a doctor at the Leicester health centre, she was present at six deaths directly before she came to Portugal on holiday, giving the same excuse for Madeleine's stuffed animal, that was with her in the months after her daughter disappeared."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-25309851541667144272012-02-22T22:30:49.500+00:002012-02-22T22:30:49.500+00:00Anon @10:26
Remember that typical high-school raf...Anon @10:26<br /><br />Remember that typical high-school raffle game, where you had a jar full of jelly-beans, and you had to guess how many there were?<br /><br />With the McCanns is the same. Only when the beans are spilled will we know how many there really were...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-25676970657670222452012-02-22T22:26:36.439+00:002012-02-22T22:26:36.439+00:00Cherie Blair is taking action against NoW for hack...Cherie Blair is taking action against NoW for hacking her phone. I wonder if this was during a call to the Mcs? <br /><br />How odd the Mcs are not taking action for their phones being hacked....or maybe not.<br /><br />More edges taken off the circle.<br /><br />How will this be woven into the picture?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-39754884882828767662012-02-22T21:25:09.966+00:002012-02-22T21:25:09.966+00:00I noticed the BH strategy too. From zero to 100% k...I noticed the BH strategy too. From zero to 100% knowledge within hours. Wanting to go over and over the same ground as though people will be worn down and give in to their conclusions. Trying to force others to engage in their flights of fantasy.<br /><br />Other forums keep the momentum going but thank goodness it doesn't happen here.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-53216671925401396102012-02-22T21:12:22.256+00:002012-02-22T21:12:22.256+00:00Anon's Feb 22, 2012 5:33:00 PM, is a typical B...Anon's Feb 22, 2012 5:33:00 PM, is a typical BH comment: "let's discuss AGAIN what has been discussed, shall we? And after we've discussed it, let's start AGAIN from the beginning..."<br /><br />BH, funny how from 5:12 to 5:33, you're go from a state of ignorance to one where you're able to say "...cooks waiters bar staff the carpenters, wilkins, and others lying...". That's fast reading by any standard.<br /><br />And if you can read and interpret so quickly, wonder why you find things bizarre...<br /><br />Textusa, they've tried to get into your blog with boots, no success, waltz in with dancing shoes, no success, and sneak in with silent slippers, and no success... they won't stop trying for some reason, and it's not bizarre.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-37721154667837974492012-02-22T20:06:28.293+00:002012-02-22T20:06:28.293+00:00Just to add to my on/off topic experience this poo...Just to add to my on/off topic experience this poor couple were totally unaware of anyone or anything around them.I could see there was no way they were going to spend a second checking the lock on the door.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-90368231381702211232012-02-22T19:51:54.556+00:002012-02-22T19:51:54.556+00:00Good that Kate wrote about when she went back to w...Good that Kate wrote about when she went back to work. She cannot dismiss what she wrote because that came from her hands. A clever judge will quickly put side to side that page of her book and the letter sent by Leicester police and will ask both to clarify the situation. An avalanche of lies is the best adjective to classify that case.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-9557809762604310832012-02-22T19:44:07.631+00:002012-02-22T19:44:07.631+00:00Anon 6: 51, if the Leicester police has no credibi...Anon 6: 51, if the Leicester police has no credibility, Kate less and less has it. She lied on many circumstances and her book could be everything but was not for sure, an account of the truth. Everything she wrote has a purpose. Her lawyers already read everything she delivered during the 4 years, and what the police has as evidences. They teach her on what she should write, in order to change everything previously delivered that could trouble her defense.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-16841461000336246152012-02-22T19:43:13.991+00:002012-02-22T19:43:13.991+00:00Off-topic, but on-topic, I think.
I have just wit...Off-topic, but on-topic, I think.<br /><br />I have just witnessed something on the way home that made my blood run cold. A couple dashed out of their house like a couple of maniacs screeching “Molly! Molly!” at the top of their voices. I presumed their little daughter had gone out of the house and they had just discovered she was missing. They both went in different directions still yelling at each other at the same time, so loud I could hear everything. Between shouting her name they shouted directions at each other and also swearing at each other as if to blame the other. The father was distraught yanking over bins and looking behind everything along the way. The mother flew like the wind down the road and out of sight before I got anywhere near. As I approached and was about to ask if I could help I could hear the mother screech “I can hear her”. The father bellowed like a bull in sheer relief. Now that is exactly how I would have expected parents to react if their child had gone missing. I have no doubt that they would have been searching until they dropped if they hadn’t found her.<br /> <br />I know what sort of parents they are and they are a lovely family but under circumstances like that I can understand they would yell blame at each other. They were cursing each other. K & G have done the opposite (in public) but they must do so behind the scenes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-46380607485835131042012-02-22T19:42:39.167+00:002012-02-22T19:42:39.167+00:00So where did the lie come from?
K telling Leicest...So where did the lie come from?<br /><br />K telling Leicester Police she was on maternity leave or the police making it up?<br /><br />K has no shame when she changes facts in her book so who knows.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-55811129831668822032012-02-22T19:40:54.875+00:002012-02-22T19:40:54.875+00:00On 143 she does say she was a locum GP and they of...On 143 she does say she was a locum GP and they offered her 2 months pay, but I understand that to be a part- time locum? She doesn't clarify that in her book.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-10678844681374355622012-02-22T18:51:28.504+00:002012-02-22T18:51:28.504+00:00Pg 39 of book, once the twins passed their first ...Pg 39 of book, once the twins passed their first birthday she returned to work part time as a GP and also as a clinical tutor to medical students for a half day every week.<br />As she says no more after this, can we assume this is the situation when they went on holiday?<br />It would be strange if she then went off on maternity leave.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-7309634711104818662012-02-22T18:36:05.165+00:002012-02-22T18:36:05.165+00:00Anon Feb 22, 2012 5:54:00 PM
Please be careful in...Anon Feb 22, 2012 5:54:00 PM<br /><br />Please be careful in the use of humour, on a very humourless subject such as the Maddie Affair. Jest as you may, but not here, and certainly not on this subject.<br /><br />I was offered Kate's book by a dear friend who paid the full price for it.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.com