tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post154237646336086350..comments2023-10-30T07:28:35.018+00:00Comments on Textusa: Imagining thingsTextusahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-73241974643877551902016-01-23T13:40:14.994+00:002016-01-23T13:40:14.994+00:00Fail to see your point.
Are poor people less like...Fail to see your point.<br /><br />Are poor people less likely to not be worried about their own well-being? You imply, that because people have modest salaries they have nothing to lose in speaking out?<br /><br />That's rather patronising on your part.<br /><br />By the way, the minimum wage in 2007 was 403€. That's 2.29€ an hour. That's 40% of what you mention.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-41690068237351788732016-01-23T10:36:48.518+00:002016-01-23T10:36:48.518+00:00".. we have said that we believe the T9 never...".. we have said that we believe the T9 never set foot in Tapas with the exception for the dinner of the 3rd."<br /><br />Did the T9 never have dinner? Did they have dinner somewhere else before ... Why did the staff at the Tapas supposedly lie about this? Please, no contracts guff or financial incentive. The minimum wage is €5.70 per hour, around £4 per hour. Were they all given massive bungs to keep quiet?<br /><br />Feel free to allow this post through, or suppress if you choose. I don't care. I can always post this on my blog as it is now in the public domain.<br /><br />Cheers, SILAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-50757072292418418682016-01-18T19:05:51.981+00:002016-01-18T19:05:51.981+00:00We would like to call the attention to readers tha...We would like to call the attention to readers that we have just added a "Post Scriptum"/Correction to the current post.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-16625108643812399152016-01-18T17:29:58.479+00:002016-01-18T17:29:58.479+00:00Censored comment:
"Anonymous has left a new ...Censored comment:<br /><br />"Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Imagining things":<br /><br />Ahahahahahahah! (laughing) I wonder how is the (censored) (you know who) going to try and de-construct all this (...)<br /><br />Well, we know how ... with a torrent of poorly differentiated perceptions interspersed with vituperative words.<br /><br />One think is for sure. The Google search engine in the UKGB places his dark corner of the Web as if included in your blog!<br /><br />The (censored) knows a bit about SEO or could it be Clarence Mitchell's outfit who does that for him?<br /><br />Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at 18 Jan 2016, 17:21:00"<br /><br />Reason for censoring: no need to stoop down to the level used by some of those who attack us. Hope you understand.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-88391793708961097252016-01-18T10:39:06.709+00:002016-01-18T10:39:06.709+00:00They've all been silenced, IMO. Someone got to...They've all been silenced, IMO. Someone got to them and frightened them into believing that whatever 'leaked out' would implicate them also. Incredibly strange that little or no one was on duty that night, and none of them saw anything! One wonders how they had such a hold on them, even to this day. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-65828238095064402592016-01-17T17:21:50.445+00:002016-01-17T17:21:50.445+00:00i guess if susan owen wanted to tell the truth the...i guess if susan owen wanted to tell the truth there are plenty of websites/discussion forums where she could spell it out quite clearly, even here !!!! What does seem odd to me is that of all the people that were in PDL that week, not a one of them has turned up on a forum to say what they saw, even if it was one of the many locals out searching that night to say they did/didnt see the mcanns or their friends searching, what the mood in this tiny village was like or to tell us any of the gossip that would surely have permeated the whole village. It seems to me that PDL has a wall of silence around it, or is that a pact to far?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-43667070795612099642016-01-16T00:45:17.321+00:002016-01-16T00:45:17.321+00:00Great post textusa I like everyone else who has co...Great post textusa I like everyone else who has commented feel sad that such a young girl has been forced to live most of her adult life with the knowledge that she lied in circumstances in which a wee baby lost her life. I think they went into the job fully aware that what was going on couldn't and wouldn't be exposed at any cost. When the maddie incident occurred to protect the secret they simply followed orders because that is what they had done since arriving. When I read your post I was uplifted with the knowledge that because people like Susan Owen had been asked to lie because she was unable to tell what she was doing there is no way this can remain a secret forever. A lot of people have said why have these people who lied originally not told the truth. I say when have they got the opportunity since to retract it. The Pj archived the case without 're interviewing them. The powers that be have prevented any negative stories or books about the case to be suppressed so even if they spoke to journalists it wouldn't have been reported. As I say I take heart that OG must have seen from this and other statements the blatant lies that lay within and have provided an avenue where people like Susan Owen can tell the truth.I hope I'm not deluded Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-10853173496379653112016-01-15T22:37:46.460+00:002016-01-15T22:37:46.460+00:00If Susan was not telling the truth, and it seems ...If Susan was not telling the truth, and it seems very clear that this is the case from your post, then one assumes that she was asked not to tell what she was really doing that evening. <br />How can those who asked her 'not to tell the truth' be sure that she will never ever tell the truth? In my opinion, they had to be 'very sure' she would never admit the truth. How did they achieve this ? For me, they would have had to perhaps make her feel guilty in some way... If I simply asked a young girl to lie for me, I would be forever worried that one day that young girl would admit the truth.. <br /><br />Excellent thought provoking post and research. Glad you are back and on such good form! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-73978620381900873762016-01-15T13:28:34.523+00:002016-01-15T13:28:34.523+00:00It is not just the nannies that have scars to bare...It is not just the nannies that have scars to bare over their enactments of 3 May 2007, they just join an ever increasing bunch of conniving people whose skins had to be saved of the involvement of a crime in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann,Abducted??<br />I think a big part of this case lies with the original Inspector Goncalo Amaral and his defamation trail issued by Carter Ruck cohorts, to try to"Silence"once and for all any machinations of the Tapas7 families involvement in any "Criminal Activity"leaving no case to answer?<br />Let us hope for the safe keeping of Mr Goncalo Amaral and his family who have been clearly affected by this case,but choose to behave with dignity and honesty to what has happened since the possible demise of Madeleine McCann!<br />The MSM and the Murdoch clan (empire) have had an extremely close association with regard to Madeleine's disappearance and the involvement of funds generated back and forth to the McCann family,book deals, headlines in news papers,Sky News and the Death of Mrs Brenda Leyland,screened every 15 minutes purported as a ***ll, when all she wanted was the Truth!<br />The UK police are held in contempt by a huge swath of people over their consistent shenanigans of involvement in the non prosecution of certain elite members of society,brutal unsolved murder of Daniel Morgan,Operation Tiberious,Police corruption,protection of the Establishment in order to try to maintain civil society, when they are helping to corrupt it? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-1334449023318872762016-01-15T12:26:12.040+00:002016-01-15T12:26:12.040+00:00The last few Blogs from Textusa have been exemplar...The last few Blogs from Textusa have been exemplary in their research and fact finding.<br />I refer back to ''Praia Da Luz', 'Sagresman' and 'Cinderella of Luz' all of which helped me to deepen my understanding of this sad and tragic Abduction Hoax.<br />This latest post nails yet another lie.<br />The use of detailed maps showing the complete ridiculousness of Susan Owen's statement.<br />Lies!, Lies! and yet more lies!<br />This case is full of them.<br />Susan Owen is clearly out of her depth owing to the embellishments within her statement..<br />Like all liars under duress, one reverts to withholding information deemed relevant whilst supplying information that is vastly irrelevant.<br />One only has to look at the 'over the top' descriptions of Madeleine by both Payne and Corner to witness this.<br />Oh yes, liars have to have good memories and once the embellishments start then the problems begin and the lie becomes more unmanageable and yet at the same time, more transparent.<br />One can only go with the presumption as Textusa points out, that pressure was quite clearly exerted on the Nannies.<br />The pressure to comply, to follow the script, to sing from the same hymn sheet.<br />I wonder, was the enthusiastic, puppy dog 'eager to please' sentiments so befitting of youth ever considered by those perpetuating the hoax?<br />It seems not.<br />Susan Owen's post reminds me of such. Going out of her way to please, conform, do what was asked with a few added embellishments!<br />Why?<br />Maybe out of fear of losing her job, overwhelmed by events, who knows?<br />Pressure was obviously exerted.<br />Susan Owen was to be no where near the vicinity of the "Abduction!"<br />Such confusion and contradictions from ALL the Nannies in their statements, not just Susan <br />I agree that the Nannies, with the exception of maybe four, were unimportant in the grand scheme of events, yet taken collectively, their statements give further weight to the confusion of the 'Abduction scenario'<br />For me personally this post is tinged with some sadness.<br />What a weight, what a burden these young Nannies have been given to bear over a lifetime, all in the pursuit of a cover up and protection of those deemed to matter much more.<br />Despite the sadness of Madeleine still not receiving the justice that she so richly deserves, the innocent pawns in this sick, tragic hoax, the Nannies, deserve some thoughts too.<br />Susan Owen could have been doing anything that fateful night as Textusa says.<br />So, why go out of the way to lie and embellish outpside of one's experience?<br />It does not make sense.<br />No, it does not, unless you have been told, quite specifically what to say and then being cast aside to hang out and dry!<br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-55598878537131272802016-01-15T09:11:08.909+00:002016-01-15T09:11:08.909+00:00Welcome back!!!!Welcome back!!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com