tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post8835034720951106223..comments2023-10-30T07:28:35.018+00:00Comments on Textusa: My Thanksgiving Turkey to ALL of You.Textusahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comBlogger31125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-52836272535532631592012-04-10T14:45:48.053+01:002012-04-10T14:45:48.053+01:00Don't worry about the pseudo psychoanalytical ...Don't worry about the pseudo psychoanalytical critics Textusa, at least your analyses are logical and well documented not just pure rhetoric - there are not many doing what you do. Very few in fact. <br /><br />Happy Easter to you too (retroactive). Keep your brain lights flashing and your thought-provoking stuff coming!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-10140182105516922702010-11-27T10:11:20.377+00:002010-11-27T10:11:20.377+00:00Thank you for such a great show of hands!
For all...Thank you for such a great show of hands!<br /><br />For all the suggestions and information, thank you.<br /><br />Promise to answer all the questions.<br /><br />From the character, received ONE further comment, which, from what I read, is the desire not to be published, so I won't. I just copy it here:<br /><br />"I see you are too much of a coward to print my replies, Textusa.<br /><br />That figures.<br /><br />You're only brave when you're bullying people who can't respond to you. <br /><br />:-)"<br /><br />A smile back at you!Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-7739371212002948032010-11-27T00:22:37.253+00:002010-11-27T00:22:37.253+00:00Anon Nov 26, 2010 10:18:00 PM said...
Textu...Anon Nov 26, 2010 10:18:00 PM said...<br /><br /> Textusa, you haven’t yet explained why is Mrs Fenn is lying. I am now sure that she is, but I’m far from understanding the why. <br /><br />That is correct. Textusa only kinda stressed out, that she is lying. Proving that only with her written statements allover one can find allover the net. As to why: Nobody knows the Why, I gave a lil hint tho in a another post in another article of Textusa. But that is just my opinion. Others might have other opinions with regards to the "Why" Ms Fenn did lie.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-58552605383230895662010-11-27T00:13:28.316+00:002010-11-27T00:13:28.316+00:00So that you guys do understand my previous posting...So that you guys do understand my previous posting and have a good laugh as well:<br /><br />"Hear ye, hear ye..... come hither all ye xenophobes and treat thyself to a copy of Kate's book..... if ye hate foreigners, and believe we Brits are superior and beyond reproach, ye won't be disappointed!"<br /><br />LMFAO!!!<br />That was posted on the MissingMadeleineForum by a British women, I think. According to her, those are the customers of Kate's book. I was ROTFLMAO. :-)<br />I suppose she is copying the accent of the McCanns (Gerry and Auntie Philomenia). When I heard them speaking... LOL<br />Issat how English ppl talk, really?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-48472848652034186132010-11-26T23:07:45.991+00:002010-11-26T23:07:45.991+00:00"Christ you are such a fuckwit.
Loads of stu..."Christ you are such a fuckwit.<br /><br />Loads of stuff gathered by LP is missing, mainly because it would have infringed every civil liberty to have allowed them to be published. There are documents about this in the process file if you could be arsed to read them"<br /><br />Is this person a joke??? <br />Is s/he saying that the witheld documents that are not published because they infringe civil liberty CAN be read...please give us the link that 'you' know about and have obviously read!<br /><br />Why has this person had access to what the rest of us don't? <br /><br />Oh my goodness....what a spooky verification I have been asked for to post this comment...mcguilt!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-82194491126961021392010-11-26T23:04:47.423+00:002010-11-26T23:04:47.423+00:00Anon Nov 26, 2010 6:49:00 PM said...
You’...Anon Nov 26, 2010 6:49:00 PM said...<br /><br /> You’re scared aren’t you Yawn? You’re starting to really fear that one of these “innocent” witnesses that you promised that there would be no problem, starts to get upset, aren’t you? And they haven’t much to lose, do they? Not as much as those, like yourself, that asked them to lie. You told that there would be NO problem, you told them that you had the Police covering your back, and you told you had the full support of the Government that this wouldn't be known, didn’t you?<br /><br />-----<br />Tehehe. You nailed it. Funny. :-)<br />Booh fucking hooh... <br />The Secret Service is no longer what it was supposed to be... Darn.<br />Thy cannot simply come here and try to intimidate ppl. Darn.<br /><br />Thy who hate foreigners! Thy who hate foreigners! LMAO!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-21990781573526875062010-11-26T22:56:53.185+00:002010-11-26T22:56:53.185+00:00So is Yawn telling is that we should all go to our...So is Yawn telling is that we should all go to our local police station and put in an official complaint? I did suspect he was something to do with the police but not after that statement. OR maybe that is a challenge because he knows no-one would be taken seriously if they did.<br /><br />Ever read the book by Inspector Gadget 'Perverting the Course of Justice'? Brilliant insight into UK policing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-72237592246009168112010-11-26T22:20:39.763+00:002010-11-26T22:20:39.763+00:00I’m not anon 8:26 but let me tell you that, as thi...I’m not anon 8:26 but let me tell you that, as this blog is public, the police may read it, and take action or not, and what Tex highlights in this post, is what is the use to report anything to THIS police? They’ll look at it, say thank you, wait for you to leave and then wait instructions for what to do with it.<br /> <br />But I’ll make deal with you. I hereby promise that I’ll file an official citizen’s complaint against Mrs Fenn’s for perjury and obstruction of justice, within a week of the McCann’s requesting the REOPENING, without limitations, not reviewing, of the process.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-78378966253224070572010-11-26T22:18:31.397+00:002010-11-26T22:18:31.397+00:00Textusa, you haven’t yet explained why is Mrs Fenn...Textusa, you haven’t yet explained why is Mrs Fenn is lying. I am now sure that she is, but I’m far from understanding the why. I’ve read Carol’s statement very attentively this time, and there are many other things that Mrs Fenn “forgets” to say, like it was in the afternoon and not morning, that the action that called Carol’s attention was the curious way the man opened and closed the gate (I think she’s talking about the Oldfield’s gate) and not because he was looking at the apartment. I honestly think that Carol is speaking truthfully. Am I wrong, and there’s something that has escaped me?<br />Another thing, she has the visit the niece on a Sunday, hears the crying on the Tuesday that coincidentally is her niece’s birthday, and has the visit of her niece again on the Thursday. Three events that she would certainly refer to if she was speaking naturally “It was on the first of May, I remember because it was the birthday of a niece that visited me a couple of days before, and also on day that all the confusion happened…” <br />Sorry to occupy so much space, but why does she come forward? She doesn’t give any explanation as to this. Carol explains quite in detail why she decided to call the authorities and she’ s in the UK, and Mrs Fenn one day decides to talk to a tabloid and then go to the police. Innocent is not a word I would to describe this ladyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-37551078074718652012010-11-26T22:13:18.089+00:002010-11-26T22:13:18.089+00:00Should we say Yawn or Gerry Mccann? Who else could...Should we say Yawn or Gerry Mccann? Who else could be so worried with discredit of some witnesses and keeping an eye on what is going on on some blogs? Only who run a fraudulent Fund based in a crime against his own daughter. And after more then 3 years, he remain the first suspect. As more time is passing, more information we achieve,more we read and more we appreciate the work of PJ- They were in the correct track and the British authorities have done a bad job to all British childs by helping a group of criminals run away and have a good life at the expenses of a child tragedy. This, yes, is so insultuous that is almost pornographic.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-53975320669606772922010-11-26T19:06:33.108+00:002010-11-26T19:06:33.108+00:00"I'll tell you what, if you are so convin..."I'll tell you what, if you are so convinced these witnesses are complicit in some vast conspiracy, or lied in their witness statements, have you reported them to the police? No, of course you haven't. You are having far too much fun attacking them on here."<br /><br />What a ridiculous statement! If Dr Amaral doesn't get heard what chance have we, the mere mortals who read on blogs, have. So we walk into our nearest police station and provide them with information we have gathered from 'blogs' and they are going to take us seriously? <br /><br />Your challenge is worse than clutter! <br /><br />I have noticed the obsession with porn on pro Mc blogs too. Maybe that needs looking into? <br />It could explain why they pros lose it big time if there is a chance their own nefarious pastimes will come under scrutiny.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-81028254707833262892010-11-26T18:53:04.355+00:002010-11-26T18:53:04.355+00:00People, look at how many words you've wasted o...People, look at how many words you've wasted on someone that isn't worth even one.<br /><br />This post is about the shameful behavior of the BRITISH POLICE. Textusa asks where are the journalists of our time?!? Isn't this enough evidence for you?!?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-9526199034268907842010-11-26T18:49:37.437+00:002010-11-26T18:49:37.437+00:00You’re scared aren’t you Yawn? You’re starting to ...You’re scared aren’t you Yawn? You’re starting to really fear that one of these “innocent” witnesses that you promised that there would be no problem, starts to get upset, aren’t you? And they haven’t much to lose, do they? Not as much as those, like yourself, that asked them to lie. You told that there would be NO problem, you told them that you had the Police covering your back, and you told you had the full support of the Government that this wouldn't be known, didn’t you?<br />You do ask how many other “innocent” witnesses is Textusa going to accuse next. You should. It's an interesting question, isn’t it? And you wish you knew the answer, because the next one might be one of those that won’t be pleased with you at all.<br />Let’s wait and see. You, at least, insist in coming back and in keeping a very close watch on this blog. And you’re entitled to that, it’s public.<br />And as we’re still on the accusation topic, what is the reason for you, in all the blog, yo use the expression “almost pornographic terms” applicable? Stop accusing the authors and readers of this blog of having sick, perverted minds. Promoting that idea is not a very good one, because people do, just like you, READ every these "long" posts, and don’t find anything of the like, It then it back at you. Do find in your vocabulary some other non-sexual related offensive wording to use next time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-72467312144584693912010-11-26T18:33:08.071+00:002010-11-26T18:33:08.071+00:00Yawn... you say “Mrs Fenn did report the incident ...Yawn... you say “Mrs Fenn did report the incident to the police very soon after Madeleine was taken - it was months before they decided to take a proper statement from her.”, but Mrs Fenn and The Sun say that “Meanwhile Portuguese cops were again under fire. The woman living in the apartment above the McCanns claimed she had not been spoken to by police until the British team arrived two weeks ago.”<br />So did she speak or not to the Police soon after the incident?… Don’t tell me your innocent witness lied to you too!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-18146128265976360282010-11-26T18:24:05.719+00:002010-11-26T18:24:05.719+00:00Yawn, this time 9:59, you’re RIGHT.
TEXTUSA didn’...Yawn, this time 9:59, you’re RIGHT.<br /><br />TEXTUSA didn’t read the justifications for having those pages missing. Here they are:<br /> <br />A - In the inquiry there are passages that contain information that can contend with the right to private life of people, not only British citizens, for whom there was found not the faintest hint of implication in this case, namely: <br /> <br />Volume I, fls. 211/212: reference to an individual with a past linked to crimes of a sexual nature with children. <br /> <br />Volume II <br />- Fls. 293/297: is a list of individuals connected with the practice of sex crimes with minors and adolescents. <br />- Fls. 298/300: reference to an individual linked with the practice of acts of pedophilia and exhibitionism; <br />- Fls. 473/474: reference to an individual linked with the practice of acts of exhibitionism. <br /> <br />Volume III, fls. 754/757: information and bibliographic record of a citizen in connection with acts of paedophilia. <br /> <br />Volume V, fls. 1246/1254: list resulting from the search carried out in the PJ Database related to individuals of foreign nationality and linked with child sexual abuse and paedophilia. <br /> <br />B - Taking into account that the essence of the Crimestoppers program is anonymity, creating a trust between the source and the police, and taking into account further that sometimes the identification of the source is not revealed, other than its e-mail address, because we believe that the rule of judicial secrecy should remain then those pages would also be removed and placed together in the Appendix previously mentioned in A above, to remain in the custody of the entity considered competent for its safe-keeping, for the sole purpose of demonstrating its existence, pursuant to Article 86(7) of the CPP. <br /> <br />C - Finally one has to refer to Attachment VI - 2: it holds work and exploitation of information regarding any possibly relevant crime as well as a survey of localized crime and crime of a sexual character. The intelligence obtained, coming to the PJ from their own knowledge base, through the British authorities and by other sources, consisting of five volumes, also contains information that can contend with the right to a private life of persons, such that its remaining in the case file would be a violation of the rights of those same people, it being certain that nothing was found relating to the purpose of this case file.<br /> <br />************<br /> <br />There you have it. The OFFICIAL explanation for all the missing pages mentioned in this post.<br /> <br />As YOU can see, NONE of the missing pages are of CFT’s Statement which, even though she didn’t read this, makes TEXTUSA’s reasoning ABSOLUTELY correct, in terms that the missing pages were NOT of the missing statement.<br />Do not divert attention. The statement is missing from the files. The pages in the process are numbered exactly to prove that all pages are there or not, so whatever was shown to CFT in April never came to Portugal. Read the post as to the reasons why.<br /> <br />By the way, don’t you find it strange for a newspaper to know what a witness is to say before the police does? Independent of whatever the disgusting The Sun spews out, it’s a fact that on this particular instance, it reports on one day what is on the files two days later. Isn’t that telling?<br /> <br />Don’t bother to answer, they’re rhetorical questions, for the readers of this blog, we know you’ll never provide an intellectual honest answer, not because you’re incapable, but because it serves you purposes to “clutter” up things.<br /> <br />By the way… you people are quite fixated with porn, aren’t you?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-18928828354766517852010-11-26T15:52:31.375+00:002010-11-26T15:52:31.375+00:00“blog appeals to one type of person in particular ...“blog appeals to one type of person in particular - shallow, stupid, unable to think for themselves. They come here for their little frisson of excitement”<br /><br />Well dear sir you are one of them / us<br /><br />Keep reading the blog you may learn something.Archimedesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-71847141881067533362010-11-26T15:15:55.226+00:002010-11-26T15:15:55.226+00:00To who accuse Textusa of bringing up a theory, why...To who accuse Textusa of bringing up a theory, why don't you spend some time reading what is available in many sources ( Pj files, Mccannfiles, Parmalan, Joana Morais blog, Hasta que se sepa la verdad blog, The Blacksmith Bureau blog, Amaral book, the book "Porque adoptamos Maddie)( This book was wrriten by many portuguese journalists who were been in the crime scene since day one) or a very interesting book called " A culpa dos Mccann" to get informed and able to made a factual opinion instead of coming to blogs like this one to insult and accuse who is doing a great research and not buying things that did not make sense. <br /> The Mccann's did not want a review? Then, some blogs are doing such review for free. Some anonymous as well. Sorry if what we find in our review is not helping their Theory, their agenda and their business. It really open other ways, far away from an abduction done by strangers. And who in one moment or another came to the saga and appeared in British tabloides seems to have the team Mccann behind.<br /> Regarding Mrs. Fenn statement to PJ. The time that she gave it is really interesting for me- It is when in UK, the DNA was under test, PJ was in standby waiting for the results and the British tabloids very busy trying to bring some entropy to the public to dismiss the work of the police and blame PJ. <br /> Carole is also an interesting character. She manage to see exactly the guy described by Jane Tanner looking to Mccann's flat, from her aunty terrace. How she knows that he was looking to Mccann's flat and not to any other since she said there is more flats and from the terrace the view was not clear or helping at all. <br /> Then come something interesting, she was looking for a property and was not the first time she went there to search for a property. Weeks before, she have been there. Murat and his girlfriend were property sellers. She came on the 28 April, same as the Mccann's and the Tapas. There is no many flights from UK in the same day. Not all the Tapas 9 came on the same flight. Then there is a huge possibility of Carol being travelling with Mccann's or with Some tapas. <br /> Leycester police, when interviewing Carol, came up with name of the place where she was staying in Algarve. Seems that that information was not gave by Carol. Then, who gave that information? Mrs. Fenn? Murat or the Tapas 9?<br /> Carol did not gave any account about the rest of the week. Only Sunday and the day that Madeleine went missing and on that day she said that Mrs. Fenn went out for lunch(Lagos) with her. And Carol leave Mrs. Fenn flat at 6:30. Was not that the time that Payne was arriving to help Kate? I can imagine somebody leaving a relative and looking at the watch to see exactly the time that the visit finnish. She seems to suffer from the same amnesia as other people- Not remembering vital information and then coming up with such details that I have to say WAW, unbeliverable. But there is more... Amazing to review what is available.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-71001153264098733952010-11-26T13:32:36.933+00:002010-11-26T13:32:36.933+00:00Well, if Textusa's "pornographic" th...Well, if Textusa's "pornographic" theory of what really went on in that fatidic afternoon of the 3rd of May is sooo outrageous, so damaging to "some people's" reputations, then how come none of "those persons" have stayed silent and quiet and did absolutely nothing about it?! How is it possible that none of them has taken Textusa to court for grosse defamation???!!!<br />I think Textusa is too close to the truth..."some people" are thinking..."better not stir the bees in their nest...let's play dead..."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-79053854150090374932010-11-26T10:57:42.512+00:002010-11-26T10:57:42.512+00:00I had my doubts, why you think Ms Fenn is lying. B...I had my doubts, why you think Ms Fenn is lying. But then I have read elsewhere, that apart from her statement of a "crying Maddie" on Tuesday night which she only gave months later, she also supplied a niece immediately, who has seen a "suspicious man" in front of the McCann appartment.<br />Seems she did a lot to support the abduction theory, yes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-48926458526356150122010-11-26T10:44:40.083+00:002010-11-26T10:44:40.083+00:00Should I say,
I Yaum @ 4:29?
You seems to be d...Should I say,<br /><br /> I Yaum @ 4:29?<br /><br /> You seems to be describing yourself in your post. You lost the north everytime Textusa come with something very well fundamented, based on facts related with the investigation, showing a hard and very intelligent work behind scenes.<br /> Are you related with Mccann's or with some witnesses? If not, why so many worries and a completely despicable vocabulary when some issues are discussed or exposed here? You can disagree. Free opinion is a most. What is unacceptable is the complete waste of words, insulting people that work without being payed, just because innocent childs deserve to be respected and deserve justice. You know, if witnesses feel unconfortable with what is been said about them in the blogs, they can always contact PJ to give their statements. The case was shelved, not closed. Any relevant statement from a witness close to the crime scene is relevant and could lead the case to be reopenned. Who is stopping this people? I believe, nobody in Portugal. Somebody behind scenes knocked on their doors to buy or impose their silence. Murat was approched by Brian Kennedy. Why should I retray my feeling that other witnesses were aproached as well?<br /> I can assure you that PJ and GNR knocked on the doors of all people around the OC few hours after being called there. Because that is a normal procedure for all polices including Portugal. Few years ago I had my Puppy stolled from a small vilage in the north of Portugal. I report the missing dog to GNR office and they immediately start questionning the people in the village and on the surrounds. Nobody signed papers. Two weeks later, GNR call me saying that they already know what happened to the dog and where it could be. It was summer time and a couple driving a car with a french plate was seen in the street in front of my granny house and in the cafe with a dog fitting the description of mine. The couple return to France and GNR wants to know if I want them to go ahead trying to locate the dog in France or not, because I will maybe need a lawyer if the couple refuse to hand the dog back voluntarely and even if I had the vaccination card with me and the municipality registration, will be hard to prove that the dog was mine. He had no chip ( at the time was not usual to put the chip). <br /> I have no doubts that in a so sensitive case, as Madeleine, the police have done all the procedures they were allowed to do in the proper time. The British tabloids can print everything they want to fit thair agendas and destroy the reputation of PJ and Amaral. But Amaral is a top investigator, very respected in Portugal and Spain. He have solved with success many misterious and sensitive cases in Portugal. He is a very clever and intelligent Cop that's why he was called and incharged of that case. Then not surprised that Prime suspects and strange witnesses don't like him and don't like who defend his job and support the investigation of the official police. He and we, are disturbing their business.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-6001483138911207242010-11-26T09:59:58.765+00:002010-11-26T09:59:58.765+00:00Another load of idiots who haven't read the pr...Another load of idiots who haven't read the process files, but pretend to have done so.<br /><br />Can I suggest you read the sections pertaining to the legal discussions regarding which information could be included in the released files? <br /><br />Preferably BEFORE you accuse people of wrongdoing. <br /><br />As for anon @8.26, you are clearly another one with the same paranoia issues, fixated on entirely innocent witnesses. I'll tell you what, if you are so convinced these witnesses are complicit in some vast conspiracy, or lied in their witness statements, have you reported them to the police? No, of course you haven't. You are having far too much fun attacking them on here.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-42621942824960455482010-11-26T09:40:21.898+00:002010-11-26T09:40:21.898+00:00Anon 4:29
After three and a half years, there isn...Anon 4:29<br /><br />After three and a half years, there isn't a single evidence to state that Madeleine was abducted. Furthermore, the windows shutters in apartment 5A were not «jemmied» as alleged by Gerry's sister and other McCann family members. <br /><br />On the "scathing" attacks made by the McCann family and PRs, regarding the CSI dogs (and on the Portuguese Police) - brought to Portugal on the advise of the British NPIA's Homicide Experts - the only traces of cadaver odour, human blood and human fluids, inconclusive but compatible to Madeleine's DNA, were found on the McCanns' car, on Kate McCann clothes, on Madeleine's plush toy, on other McCann family belongings and inside apartment 5A.<br /><br />After three and a half years, there isn't a single evidence to state that Madeleine was abducted, in fact, all the investigation to Madeleine's disappearance made by several police forces in cooperation with the Portuguese Judiciary Police, point that: <br /><br />1) The child, Madeleine McCann, died in the Ocean Club Apartment, in Praia da Luz, on the evening of the 3rd of May, 2007;<br />2) A simulation of an abduction took place;<br />3) Kate Marie Healy and Gerald Patrick McCann are suspected of being involved in the concealment of their daughter’s cadaver,<br />4) The death may have been the outcome of a tragic accident;<br />5) There are indications of neglect regarding the guardianship and security of the children.<br /><br />Why do you think Kate has washed the Cuddly Cat days before the British police arrival with trained dogs? Even then, the dog found death accent. Questioned by the police Kate said that she used to take cuddle cat to the morgue. Simple as that. That's how the toy was contaminated.<br /> <br />Now, a question for you: do you use to take your kid's toys when you're cleaning your toilette? Very often? Oh Boy!<br /><br />Why do you think McCanns have not a public support from Theresa May?<br /><br />Is it because this case is a bomb? What kind of bomb (you're asking now). The EXPLODING KIND!<br /><br />I'm sure they will never wave from a jail window but I assure you they are condenmed to have peace no more. <br /><br />This case and all they've made with it is absolutely UNFORGIVABLE!<br /><br />5-AAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-22759410285975203482010-11-26T09:07:35.615+00:002010-11-26T09:07:35.615+00:00Anon @ 4,29
"
Your blog appeals to one type o...Anon @ 4,29<br />"<br />Your blog appeals to one type of person in particular - shallow, stupid, unable to think for themselves"<br /><br />I ca assure you I and many, many others do not fit this description, quite the opposite. You are talking about Chaosrapters blog where everone follows the Mc spin. I guess because it has closed down you have to post elsewhere. <br />As soon as someone gets as defensive as you have there is a reason. Why are you so involved in defending potential witnesses? <br />How can Textusa or anyone else read something that is MISSING? <br /><br />I'm not at all surprised Textusa allowed your comment, it speaks volumes. Readers here have open minds and the intelligence to weigh up the available evidence. I notice you offered nothing to the debate apart from aggression. Being rude to someone who has given plausible information is 'leaving no stone unturned' which is what the Mc purport to do. Have they ever spoken to Mrs F? I doubt it, what would be the point? I know I would quiz my neighbours mercilessly for any recollections. <br /><br />You can be as rude and defensive as you like but the readers here will not be put off taking on board the things Textusa has to say. She is not afraid to speak out.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-30313259193076131142010-11-26T08:54:00.945+00:002010-11-26T08:54:00.945+00:00Murat, Fenn and Wilkins - The triumvirate of evil,...Murat, Fenn and Wilkins - The triumvirate of evil, all involved in an epic tale to support a twisted theory that has no basis. <br /><br />It could be so simple. A child dies and the parents decide to hide the body and enact a nightly kidnapping while everybody is asleep. No danger of neglect charges, no need for elaborate timelines that don't fit. Then comes along a family of nine in a usually deserted lane and the whole plan is turned upside down.Johannahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02326174422980784779noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-79894631502357915172010-11-26T08:26:48.364+00:002010-11-26T08:26:48.364+00:00Anon 4:29, or should we say yawn, stop your futile...Anon 4:29, or should we say yawn, stop your futile attacks on the messenger and question, if you nay the message. Ans do stop being vague as you're usually are. If you say it's written, say where, as Textusa is doing, if you say someone said, say who says it like Textusa is doing. It seems you're the one NOT reading the comments. Mrs Fenn from the FACTS presented (and please don't ask what facts, they are there for you to read) is far from an innocent witness. Neither is Murat. Neither is WilkinsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com