tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post8273946145612520090..comments2023-10-30T07:28:35.018+00:00Comments on Textusa: All the world's a stage (1/3)Textusahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comBlogger46125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-1890119690798704712015-02-26T20:51:56.586+00:002015-02-26T20:51:56.586+00:00Thanks for the reply Textusa :)
I'm really lo...Thanks for the reply Textusa :)<br /><br />I'm really looking forward to reading your next post tomorrow :)<br /><br />Nuala xAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-43778924062083106312015-02-26T16:00:15.275+00:002015-02-26T16:00:15.275+00:00Hi textusa, just realised my mix up of names in my...Hi textusa, just realised my mix up of names in my post from13.12.<br />Russel O'brien, Jane Tanners partner instead of the name I used (Rob Oldfield) apologies to any Rob Oldfields!<br />so should read as,<br />Perhaps DCI Nicola Wall can find out why Russell O'Brien had Robert Murats phone contact details in his mobile phone as didn't DCI Redwood state he had phone records from around the time of the disappearance of Madeline 3 May 2007.<br /><br />Russell states his first contact with Robert Murat the morning of 4 May 2007 outside his mothers villa residence, when Madeline was seen alive by the Tapas group of Special friends on the previous evening.<br />So Robert Murat meets both Gerry McCann and Stephen Carpenter,Russell O'Brien in one Morning, was (Jane Tanner their as well?)<br />Perhaps, DCI Wall can explain how Gerry's and Robert's mobile phones both have a sudden reconnection time at a certain time/date in Portugal,Golf course may be when they are supposedly not to have been introduced to one another yet?<br />Sincere apology over the name mix up,got carried away reading your posts, brain freeze! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-45576323482842163472015-02-26T13:53:05.843+00:002015-02-26T13:53:05.843+00:00Hi Textuas, one thing bothering me about DCI Redwo...Hi Textuas, one thing bothering me about DCI Redwoods creche Dad explanation,bundle man why would creche Dads daughter be wearing Pyjamas when she is supposed to have been in the creche,did he dress her for bed then decide to to take her to the creche, very strange?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-27422060540829849912015-02-26T13:12:28.070+00:002015-02-26T13:12:28.070+00:00Hi textusa, I wonder how long before ex DCI Redwoo...Hi textusa, I wonder how long before ex DCI Redwood will become an associate as a private Investigator in "Leaving No Stone Unturned" into the disappearance /Abduction by a stranger as his conclusion whilst being lead detective on Operation Grange/whitewash?<br /><br />The lead ex- detective wanted to hear from the first named arquido, RM as a Person of Interest in this case,which he was to investigate as though the "Abduction had happened from the UK's perception" in the UK,which of course did not happen!.<br /><br />Stephen Carpenter so called introduces Robert Murat to Gerry as an interpreter?<br />So how can DCI Nicola Wall not be able to interview Gerry of how well he knows Robert Murat,("i'm not going to comment on that") when Clarence Mitchell was stood at his side on the video? Person of Interest. Nicola?<br />Perhaps Nicola can also find out why Rob Oldfield had Robert Murat's phone contact details in his mobile, as didn;t DCI Redwood state that they had phone records available from the disappearance 3 May 2007, Rob Oldfield states he was first introduction to Robert Murat outside his Mothers Villa, morning of the 4 May 2007, when Madeline was last seen alive by the Tapas group of special friends,3 May 2007!<br />Perhaps, DCI.Wall can explain how Gerry's and Roberts mobile phones both have reconnection times at a certain time /date in Portugal,Golf course? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-18685514166268714632015-02-25T22:45:54.134+00:002015-02-25T22:45:54.134+00:00Anonymous25 Feb 2015, 22:30:00 and 22:38:00,
To b...Anonymous25 Feb 2015, 22:30:00 and 22:38:00,<br /><br />To be clear, we find manga profoundly distasteful. For the reason you speak of: portrayal of young teens, 14/15 yr old girls (would disagree with manga portraying pre-teens, 10-13 yrs girls)<br /><br />But, and that is what matters in this case, not considered illegal in Portugal. So it's wrong saying (we know you didn't, but some do) that there were found paedo images in one of Murat's computers.<br /><br />Distasteful, yes, illegal, no.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-21114628028491033652015-02-25T22:38:12.558+00:002015-02-25T22:38:12.558+00:00Sorry, forgot to add that RM cartoons would now be...Sorry, forgot to add that RM cartoons would now be illegal in UK. They portray pre teensAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-10940820498708481052015-02-25T22:33:37.623+00:002015-02-25T22:33:37.623+00:00http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/CARLOS-COSTA.htm...http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/CARLOS-COSTA.htmAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-85020723440195195372015-02-25T22:30:15.515+00:002015-02-25T22:30:15.515+00:00Textusa,
http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teessid...Textusa,<br />http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/anime-fan-convicted-over-illegal-7958896<br />Manga illegal images<br />The law has changed in UK since 2007.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-14304338838894946462015-02-25T21:03:07.531+00:002015-02-25T21:03:07.531+00:00Nuala,
We are into subjective territory on this.
...Nuala,<br /><br />We are into subjective territory on this.<br /><br />We have thought up to now that the paedophilia stigmatisation was centered solely on David Payne.<br /><br />Involving Gerry in the Gaspars episode, may prove us wrong and you right.<br /><br />We saw the encryption as a possible means of communication between him and "Very Important Guests".<br /><br />Reading your words, makes us think that you may be more spot-on on this than we are.<br /><br />VIGs use third parties to do the communications for them, so we would agree with you.<br /><br />Gonçalo Amaral considers your possibility.<br /><br />The "manga" (japonese adult cartoons) found on one of the computers didn't help him much.<br /><br />In our defence, we were clear that we were just speculating on the encrypting thing! :)<br /><br />Thank you!Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-47867826370208044132015-02-25T20:12:39.963+00:002015-02-25T20:12:39.963+00:00Thanks for the update Textusa, you go to so much t...Thanks for the update Textusa, you go to so much trouble to give us such detailed analyses and it's very appreciated :)<br /><br />The anon phone call on 8th May re Robert Murat, I thought that was someone trying to implicate him, rather than being someone who actually knew him, particularly because of this bit:<br /><br /><i>"She said most of the mails he sent were encrypted due to the monitoring of the kind of content they possessed."</i><br /><br />That implies correspondence related to paedophilia. Swinging isn't illegal and any correspondence involving adults and sexual activity wouldn't require encryption, I imagine cyberspace is full of it, only if it concerned children would extra care need to be taken.<br /><br />It seemed to me the anon woman was trying to imply RM was a paedophile hence a prime suspect for abducting a little girl and it was received the same day CEOP arrived whereas Costa's statement wasn't received until 15th May and RM was made a suspect on 14th May.<br /><br />I'm probably missing something obvious though as usual ;-)<br /><br />Nuala xAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-63576930562898501432015-02-25T18:54:55.773+00:002015-02-25T18:54:55.773+00:00They say there was a wedding in Italy, it doesn...They say there was a wedding in Italy, it doesn't make it true.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-15468242992803654332015-02-25T15:24:28.363+00:002015-02-25T15:24:28.363+00:00Knowing how the BH's have tried to shape perc...Knowing how the BH's have tried to shape perception of this case (stink bombs , clutter etc.), I wonder if the concept of TAPAS 9 was invented from the start to make us think this was a group of doctors on holiday. It is clear that a wider bunch of guests were involved and helped in the 'cover-up' - and that some of the other 60 guests knew members of the TAPAS 9 better than the TAPAS 9 knew each other. The focus on the TAPAS 9 may have been intended to mislead - to make us associate this with a small number of doctors (possibly there on a medical conf / pharmaceutical conf), deflecting from the wider group of guests who were evidently from all walks of life united by a 'party'. From their rogatory statements, some members of the TAPAS 9 only knew Kate and Gerry from FP's wedding in Italy and had scarcely met since then. Why link these 9 people when there were clearly stronger links between other members of the TAPAS 9 and other guests.. just wonder if it was clutter aimed to confuse and distract..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-84188162844150254772015-02-25T13:54:52.447+00:002015-02-25T13:54:52.447+00:00Good for you ! They have been hi jacking the truth...Good for you ! They have been hi jacking the truth and have expected everyone to shut up while they were busy covering their tracks, causing havoc in people's lives. Appreciate your investigation and that you are finding all the rats who helped mccanns build the confusion stories around their little girl. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-18565561328155673812015-02-25T12:03:38.062+00:002015-02-25T12:03:38.062+00:00Anonymous 25 Feb 2015, 11:32:00,
Thank you for yo...Anonymous 25 Feb 2015, 11:32:00,<br /><br />Thank you for your question, we have already answered it the Post Scriptum we wrote to our "Planting a spy" post"<br />http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2015/02/planting-spy.htmlTextusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-64666331513640473332015-02-25T11:32:58.667+00:002015-02-25T11:32:58.667+00:00Just another puzzle from SC. When he relates meeti...Just another puzzle from SC. When he relates meeting RM for the first time he proceeds to take him to see Gerry. The way he describes this is as if he had been to the apartment on the same morning,possibly having just come back from there? Can you ( or will you soon.)throw some light on that?<br /><br />From SC interview McCannPJfiles......<br /> he told me he was Robert and this was the first time I had seen this man. Robert mentioned that he had a daughter in Norfolk who was the same age as Madeleine, and that is why he was able to understand what they were going through. We walked back along the path that I had taken to Gerry's apartment and I explained that Robert spoke Portuguese fluently, he told Gerry that it was important to have someone who spoke the language so that nothing would be lost in translation.. And that was how Robert Murat was presented as a translator.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-33633986660117707792015-02-25T11:06:52.926+00:002015-02-25T11:06:52.926+00:00Thanks for updating the background. You do such a ...Thanks for updating the background. You do such a great job in understanding all the little elements behind the actions. These people were reacting on a daily basis to events and thinking on their feet. What an enormous effort was made to hamper the investigation. That you have been able to see through it - and Amaral was too - is excellent. To hide the swinging party was so essential to them that it warranted this effort and resource Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-7424535770594551062015-02-25T09:02:28.165+00:002015-02-25T09:02:28.165+00:00We inform readers that we have now published the u...We inform readers that we have now published the updated "Background".Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-92106935166770369882015-02-24T23:57:29.814+00:002015-02-24T23:57:29.814+00:00Unpublished Anonymous at 24 Feb 2015, 22:03:00,
W...Unpublished Anonymous at 24 Feb 2015, 22:03:00,<br /><br />We won't be told by you what we MUST do or when.<br /><br />If you want to develop a contamination theory, there are blogs, possibly yours, where you can do that (not must, as we won't give you orders)-<br /><br />You will have to wait patiently for what we intend to publish.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-13340998909730725832015-02-24T18:17:29.961+00:002015-02-24T18:17:29.961+00:00Good point.Good point.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-44206263735287986552015-02-24T15:17:23.853+00:002015-02-24T15:17:23.853+00:00Thanks for letting us know. Look forward to the re...Thanks for letting us know. Look forward to the revisions so that we get an even greater understanding of the case.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-85425367638269950022015-02-24T13:48:52.379+00:002015-02-24T13:48:52.379+00:00We would like to warn our readers that we’re curre...We would like to warn our readers that we’re currently updating partially this post.<br /><br />To be more precise, in its point 2 “Background”.<br /><br />This post, as we have said was lengthy. Reason why it is being posted in 3 parts. Its extensiveness caused for us to overlook crucial information.<br /><br />In continuing our research we realized that 3 statements in the files plus other assorted material were of the utmost importance to truly understand the background to Stephen Carpenter’s statement.<br /><br />With this “new” information things about the background changed significantly.<br /><br />It reinforces our beliefs and what we have written.<br /><br />There is one correction to be made on what we have published last Friday and that was to say that “Operation Bait” was a success. It wasn’t. It was indeed a flop.<br /><br />However, due to surprising twists and turns in what is indeed a complex set of events, this correction has made us to be even more convinced in our beliefs as to what the material truth pertaining the Maddie’s case is.<br /><br />The current “Background” is wrong, by default.<br /><br />We owe it to our readers to correct it before we publish part 2.<br /><br />We hope to do that tomorrow morning.<br /><br />Thank you all for understanding.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-33186519665250779752015-02-23T16:11:18.642+00:002015-02-23T16:11:18.642+00:00Hi Textusa,
Thanks for the latest addition, insi...Hi Textusa,<br /><br /><br />Thanks for the latest addition, insightful as always.<br /><br /><br />Some other miscellaneous oddities not o often reference in SC's statements. perhaps to highlight your point that SC often gives away too much information, or just too many words, more than are required to relay details as perhaps actually intended.<br /><br />1<br /><br />"A man was sitting on the esplanade having a drink whilst waiting for a take away" - how do you know he was waiting for a take away?<br /><br />"I hadn't realised that the Tapas bar had a take away service" - Well isn't that great? and who enlightened you they did then?<br /><br />Full quote:<br /><br />"Another couple whose names I do not remember, sat at the table opposite us. A man was sitting on the esplanade having a drink whilst waiting for a take away, I spoke to them briefly, I hadn't realised that the Tapas bar had a take away service." - What? So did they tell you about this man's takeaway for some reason? Was this the topic of conversation? Who were this couple? You say you spoke briefly, was it about the guy having take away or you concluded this because he was sitting with a drink - what are the reasons you believe he was waiting for takeaway? Too many info droplets into the 'validation needed' test tube.<br /><br />2<br /><br />"..and afterwards [after searching other apartments and contaminating possible crime scenes] we walked to the beach in the attempt to find the scent, to see of she had got lost alone or had fallen into the sea, and it was just him and me and the dog handlers, so that there was not any big theme of conversation, just walking the route - or on the way back, when we arrived we talked with different Portuguese police" <br /><br />- What route? to the beach? there are many routes to the beach - or do you mean route the police [or handlers] were walking with the dogs, as in, up and down the beach? if so, why don't you just say something softer to that effect. Odd word choice, 'the route' quite specific. There was a lot of hanging out with the police that day.<br /><br />3<br /><br />UK Police officer - "then you met Neil and Raj who began to talk and told you that they had collaborated in the searches the night before" - that's that covered off.<br /><br />4<br /><br />"You told them that you remember that some of the reporters were being unfair and incorrect because they were treating the situation as that of a missing child and not of a child whom had been abducted" <br /><br />This is gargantuan - he met them 3 times, and has decided it is unfair, inappropriate, to use the word 'missing' instead of 'abducted' when referencing a missing child - For some reason, SC is already into politics and PR - to a BBC reporter no less.<br /><br />5<br /><br />"That is why it could obviously be seen, these apartments could be looked over from above and all the lower parts and where we, hummm.. this is where the grey haired man was."<br /><br />Continue please - 'where we, hummm' what? - Do continue... Where we were searching? No? Where we were doing what?<br /><br /><br />Lastly:<br /><br />[UK officer reading PJ question in rotatory}<br /><br /> DCF: OK, and it asks here what his behaviour was like on Thursday, 3rd May' <br /> SC: His behaviour during the day or'<br /> DCF: On all the occasions that you saw him.<br /> SC: Always very good. <br /><br />- Why then differentiate to explicitly ask for a time if he was 'always very good' - you said you didn't see him the night of the 3rd, bar at the Tapas, but not after the alleged abduction by virtue that you were gone by 9:30pm - so why would you need this clarification? - Why the need to check the time the question refers to if you hadn't seen a need for his behaviour to be different than any other time you saw him?<br /><br /><br />Looking forward to your next post.<br /><br /><br />GP.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-82698071872159589402015-02-23T15:14:49.865+00:002015-02-23T15:14:49.865+00:00hI Textusa, with regard to post of 13.58 credit ca...hI Textusa, with regard to post of 13.58 credit cards, Did Gerry McCann pay for the hire car, Renault Scenic,which he and a group of cohorts used by credit/debit card,Mr John Brown? <br />As he or spokesperson's stated he did not have a credit card whilst in Portugal 2007, but then had his wallet/ credit card stolen when returning back there from the UK, with special books not for sale to the public, found in the rented apartment?<br />The UK Government refused the PJ access to this information, Why, freedom of information Act, National Security?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-25251461838711005332015-02-23T13:58:09.478+00:002015-02-23T13:58:09.478+00:00Textusa I suspect that the BHs may have been a bi...Textusa I suspect that the BHs may have been a bit unlucky that the Smiths time was set in stone with the credit card receipt. If it had not been the 45 minutes between bundleman and smithman would have been explained away as the smiths being mistaken about the timeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-60786740516179688562015-02-22T18:18:51.707+00:002015-02-22T18:18:51.707+00:00Hi Textusa!
Re reading some of the Staments and t...Hi Textusa!<br />Re reading some of the Staments and the Rogatory Statments,iam continually agast at the almost Blase' approach these "witnesses" have!!!!<br />It's as if those people were involved in an Investigation into missing Luggage and not the whereabouts of a 3yr,nearly 4,years old little girl! Absolutley astounding! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com