tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post6585772963463331107..comments2023-10-30T07:28:35.018+00:00Comments on Textusa: Textusa Is Giving Up On The Maddie AffairTextusahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comBlogger39125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-88293246792989142342012-01-11T10:17:29.707+00:002012-01-11T10:17:29.707+00:00I apologize for ruining the mysterious interpretat...I apologize for ruining the mysterious interpretation given to my comment! Certainly I believe Tex has a more clear idea about what I wrote. In fact I have a personal insight about of what has happened on May 2007 except using my intuition about the most important data and first reactions in the early days (after that special timing information was already intoxicated).<br /><br /> And I'm not coming here to "grab some data" because you know as much or as little as me. What I meant - and it was eventually confirmed by Textusa two posts later - is that the thesis that will persist officially (SY and other official sources) will be ABDUCTION! Again, truth is out of our reach! There are two fronts "laundering evidence": strategical broadcasted information released by media with high coverage (to reinforce the message frequency "abduction, abduction, abduction...") plus a respected source "the police is investigating abduction not the parents". <br /><br />The other front is nature itself - it's action is a well known "lifting" produced by erosion agents - especially devastated it's action over sensitive evidence. <br /><br />Time seems to be the most important agent that contains itself two contradictory aspects: on one hand, destroying possible evidence that could be valuable to unravel the mystery. On the other hand, acts like a data corridor, where one can exposed a set of available information (recorded data, behaviors and reactions) to be evaluated and analyzed with great care and deep knowledge.<br /><br />Time allow us to put "things in perspective" and asks things like: " why there is not one single clue about the whereabouts of the most advertised girl on planet earth.... Should we start looking for evidence on Mars instead of someone's backyard?<br /><br />A.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-24211900974798163292012-01-08T06:34:21.300+00:002012-01-08T06:34:21.300+00:00Quite a mysterious posting by A. It seems like the...Quite a mysterious posting by A. It seems like the person who wrote those words has a personal insight into what happened and it appears she is teasing us; I'm assuming it's a woman.<br /><br />Said person believes that in retrospect the reason that they decided to cover up the tragedy does not seem to be much of a reason now, certainly it does not justify the turmoil that was unleashed into their lives. This person describes life as being unpredictable, which is true, for example who would expect to lose their child forever while on vacation. I fully agree with this person when she states that our lives are further complicated when we choose not to do what is right, in this case failing to tell authorities how Madeleine died. I can imagine the fear that a couple would live with knowing that the people that sided with their story, their lie, did so only for convenience and may in the future go against them when it's no longer in their best interests. According to this person the couple wants to walk away from the limelight but can't, possibly because there are people taking advantage of the predicament they put themselves in. They thought they could conceal the truth, their cancer, by controlling the information fed to the media but they did not imagine that there would be an insidious and relentless search for the truth. A search that has further aggravated their way of life. Apparently the hardest part of all this for the couple in question is when they are alone and faced with their true images not those false images reflected back to them by the people they have duped. The truth is always at risk of spreading especially when more than one person knows it.<br /><br /><br />I'm also available for Palm Readings.guerrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04421453698147101869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-59263439695381750052012-01-07T14:44:43.379+00:002012-01-07T14:44:43.379+00:00One lie buys another lie. From lie to lie, the cou...One lie buys another lie. From lie to lie, the couple ruin their defense in any impartial court. The only reason they still free and able to debit more lies, is because other people are involved on the main behavior that took them to PDL AND THIS PEOPLE ARE PROTECTING THEM BY PREVENTING THE CASE TO REACH A PROPER COURT. If the case reach a court with independent judges, Carter-ruck methods will be exposed and the lawyers from that office, ridicularized. The Portuguese lawyers already lost the credibility. The only one that remains with some dignity is Pinto de Abreu, who manage to get out of the circus at the right time. Wonder he never appears in TV to make comments on Mccann's case. He knows, PJ was right, the girl is dead and the evidences are strong enough to make the parents arguidos ( suspects). Kate is so stupid that immortalized that on her book. She act like a child when is caught in a lie. Try to cover it with some more lies.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-9397386225082243222012-01-07T12:41:09.391+00:002012-01-07T12:41:09.391+00:00Anon @ 11.51. Further to your comments article goe...Anon @ 11.51. Further to your comments article goes on to say about the fluids found in the car (which K lied about at the inquiry and committed perjury.<br /><br />"But the McCanns say the fluids probably came from Madeleine's unwashed pyjamas and sandals which were carried in the boot when the family was moving apartments."<br /><br />UNWASHED pyjamas carried in the car! But wasn't Maddie supposed to have been 'abducted' wearing her pyjamas?<br /><br />That's the trouble with lying you have to explain them with more lies.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-82997978762256169472012-01-07T11:51:26.235+00:002012-01-07T11:51:26.235+00:00Exactly, anon 10:44. That is exactly my feeling. W...Exactly, anon 10:44. That is exactly my feeling. When they discovered, the police was not buying the abduction and there is no evidences to bake it, they start fabricating the evidences. The brown stain falls on the same pile as the Maddie crying on the previous night and the conversation Kate claimed , she had near the pool where she highlighted to the OC worker the fact they are leaving the kids unattended when they went for dinners. She is trying to force evidences. The abductor who had a key and entered the flat knowing the kids were alone and the parents away for dinner. The abductor, who enter the flat on the previous night and scared Madeleine, that's why she cried. The abductor who used a chemical to sedate the 3 children.<br /> She is really perverted. Now look in to another detail that kills all the strategies of that mother: the abductor, who appears to be a very well informed and organized person, manage to commit such major erros- be in the flat when Gerry went there( according to Gerry words) and carry the girl when a friend of the parents was outside the flat, in the street( Jane Tanner with her egg man). The guy was so slim and so powerful that he was not spotted by JW or GM and took less then a blink to carry the child in a uncomfortable position and descend the all street. What a joke that mother become and the Leveson judges who aligned with her lies.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-82672466600553949462012-01-07T10:44:04.060+00:002012-01-07T10:44:04.060+00:00Reading the article I noticed this.
They washed t...Reading the article I noticed this.<br /><br />They washed the children and had breakfast at the apartment between 08:00 and 08:30 a.m .... During breakfast .... She noticed a stain .... on Madeleine's pyjama top, which she washed a little later that same morning.<br /><br />Why would the children be washed BEFORE breakfast? If they were washed wouldn't that be when they are dressed? <br />The stain was noticed DURING breakfast so what were the children wearing during breakfast? Kate implies she was looking at Maddie dressed in pyjamas not a washed and dressed child like the first sentence indicates.<br /><br />If Maddie was not wearing the pyjamas then Kate would not be at the breakfast table to find the stained pyjamas. <br /><br />The whole thing doesn't make sense. I tend to go woth the theory Kate was trying to make a case for the 'abductor' being in the apartment the previous night and sedating the children with chloroform which can leave a brown stain.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-62131201571388775462012-01-07T07:53:46.332+00:002012-01-07T07:53:46.332+00:00A very good article from Dr. Martin Roberts at Mcc...A very good article from Dr. Martin Roberts at Mccannfiles, " Washed up". It shows the inconsistencies delivered by a desperate Kate, while describing her movements on May 3. No surprise they run away from a reconstruction.<br /> Anybody remembers how was the weather in PDL on May 3, 2007? I could be confused but I think I read somewhere that the weather was terrible that week and May 3 was a cloudy day. If so, no any chance of having a cotton pyjama washed at late morning, dry by the afternoon, no matter if was a late afternoon. <br /> Only who don't know the Algarve can believe another lie delivered by Kate. It happen to me in sunny July and august having to wait a day and night to have a cotton cloth dried. Only swimming suits and light shirts dry quickly. The Winnie the pooh pajamas presented by Mccann's to the press, looks thick cotton. No any chance to have it ready for the night of May 3.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-50289716371898273822012-01-06T17:51:00.511+00:002012-01-06T17:51:00.511+00:00A. Well, when the McCanns were named arguidos. It&...A. Well, when the McCanns were named arguidos. It's not something you could ignore. It's not something where you could just present a story that was based on a comment from the McCanns' official spokesperson.<br /><br />Q. LORD JUSTICE LEVESON: Did you do any work to find out precisely what that meant in Portuguese law?<br /><br />A. Yes, a lot of work, yeah. We spoke to lawyers in Portugal, and it was explained to me that there were subtle differences between arguidos and suspects. There's no legal equivalent.<br /><br />Q. LORD JUSTICE LEVESON: They're merely entitled to have legal representation and have other advantages, isn't that right? That's what Dr McCann told us, I think. I remove the word "merely" from what I just said.<br /><br />A. No, we were given a completely different version by the lawyers in Portugal. We were told that effectively an arguido is a suspect. It gives the police an opportunity to put much tougher questions than they could to a witness, and they were allowed legal representation and I think the McCanns themselves were given some very, very tough questions from the Portuguese police.<br /><br /><br />I think Pilditch should name the Portuguese lawyers who told him that Police can ask “tougher” questions than to a witness. <br />It’s been explained to deaf ears what an arguido is: a citizen considered, by Justice, to may having committed a crime. In other words, the legal system is warning him, in HIS DEFENSE, that he’s being considered OFFICIALLY a suspect. A person has to sign a notification to that effect, where it’s explained ALL the rights one has due to this status. One is, unlike the WITNESSES, to be heard by the Police in the presence of a lawyer.<br />How much more ridiculous can this become?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-63827249082458960242012-01-06T17:23:22.483+00:002012-01-06T17:23:22.483+00:00Leveson's either a knave or a fool. The latter...Leveson's either a knave or a fool. The latter if the Mcs have influenced what he believes. A knave if he knows the truth and pretends otherwise.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-34283683385396619772012-01-06T08:35:22.380+00:002012-01-06T08:35:22.380+00:00With google translator:
Good day!
About A. :
By...With google translator:<br />Good day!<br /><br />About A. :<br /><br />By chance I also agree about the comment from A. It is puzzling, yes.<br /><br />But think about everything that is worth more than generalities without pointing to any particular purpose. Speaking of poor decision-making is a situation that happens to us all at any time.<br /><br />But for me, there is another aspect to consider: ends with a question mark<br />(Question text / Sisters).<br /><br />Usually it is a technique of those who want to know more, not giving data.<br /><br />It is the technique of psychotherapy:<br /><br />repeat the last sentence of the "patient" transforming it into question, so that it responds.<br /><br />Signing with A. is a more generalist.<br /><br />A. It can be A non.<br /><br />And A. (s) there are many in every nationality.<br /><br />Therefore, the said A. want to grab some data or response through this blog.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15248067846422149470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-90646685851880746992012-01-06T08:27:49.091+00:002012-01-06T08:27:49.091+00:00Bom dia!
Acerca de A. :
Por acaso também concor...Bom dia! <br /><br />Acerca de A. :<br /><br />Por acaso também concordo acerca do comentário de A. É enigmático,sim. <br /><br />Mas, sobre tudo considero que se vale mais de generalidades sem apontar para algum dado objectivo. Falar de tomada de decisões erradas é uma situação que nos acontece a todos em qualquer momento.<br /><br />Mas, para mim, há mais um aspecto a considerar : acaba com uma interrogação<br /> ( pergunta a Text/Sisters).<br /><br />Costuma ser uma técnica de quem quer saber mais, não dando dados.<br /><br />É a técnica das psicoterapias: <br /><br />repetir a última frase do " paciente" transformando-a em pergunta, de modo a que este responda. <br /><br />Assinando com A. é por de mais generalista.<br /><br />Pode ser A. de A non. <br /><br />E A. (s) há muitos em qualquer nacionalidade.<br /><br />Portanto, o dito A. quer sacar algum dado ou resposta através deste blog.<br /><br />xxs to Text and Kind Regards to all Sisters.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15248067846422149470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-74395089883789094442012-01-06T05:59:44.325+00:002012-01-06T05:59:44.325+00:00What an enigmatic comment A.!What an enigmatic comment A.!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-80098520841683573862012-01-05T10:12:58.508+00:002012-01-05T10:12:58.508+00:00I found this post interesting Tex.
You know there...I found this post interesting Tex.<br /><br />You know there is a lot of things that we will not know about through official channels. Reasons are sometimes simpler than we thought. But until we reach them we never know. And when we got it we might say (this was the reason?)<br /><br />Yet there is something that is out of control of any human being, whoever he is, or a pressure group: is life itself, that part of it we cannot control, which takes place sometimes in the most unpredictable way... Seems naive, is not! It happens often.<br /><br />The possibility of developing this process begins when you choose not do the right thing. The error starts here. Then you can chew on that error, try to control it, but there's always a chance of that thing empowering itself and surprise you the way you never thought it will.<br /><br />It is especially difficult when these issues are depending on the description of others, who now took our side for any convenience, but tomorrow who knows what other decisions may have to take.<br /><br />There should be no reason to oblige to this hell but why all this then? Another question that remains unanswered for now...<br /><br />Such as cancer, you can use the control of the information broadcasted as a therapeutic process to control the spread of the evil to other vital organs (avoiding court keeping freedom). But if the thing is bad (this case seemed to strain) you can never control the branches of evil that seems to have discovered the ideal environment to develop... slowly... creating focus of infection here and there (stress caused by police, new clues, disturbing evidence...) wearing you down the immune system (resistance to fear of being caught and exposed) and of course making your life a hell, despite marketing campaigns. <br /><br />Regardless of all that might happen on this case, there is something we must not overlook: when the day ends and the curtains cames down and the stage light go out we have no choice but to live with ourselves! It seems a minor thing but... this can be very painful for some...<br /><br />I wish you a New Year full of LIGHT and much more protected from darkness and obsessions that for unknown reasons it's solution is beyond our possibilities. This does not mean that we are no longer angry, mean that we shook the sandals and left to other lands (always curious to know the truth one day). <br /><br />The way to the truth is mysterious but achievable. One has to follow the right track. The truth is lying in a secret place somewhere out there and more than one holds the key... that the trouble of controlling the thing... you know what I mean?<br /><br />A.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-32322332354679258602012-01-05T09:00:09.662+00:002012-01-05T09:00:09.662+00:00Portia, please read the post again as I think you ...Portia, please read the post again as I think you might have misread what Textusa is saying. It will put your mind at rest.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-59826665744585591692012-01-05T06:59:30.335+00:002012-01-05T06:59:30.335+00:00At this stage of the game those who murdered this ...At this stage of the game those who murdered this child and those that went out of their way to protect them, must share equal culpability and accountability.<br />As far as I am concerned Clarence Mitchell must get equal time.<br />And whoever covered for him likewise.suhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01229359526524987174noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-32498657885523229512012-01-04T21:39:22.120+00:002012-01-04T21:39:22.120+00:00Dear Text!
Couple of weeks ago I bowed out myself...Dear Text!<br /><br />Couple of weeks ago I bowed out myself, vowing never to click into any one of the McCs connections.<br /><br />Some days later I got up again, precisely because apparently there once was a small child which vanished into thin air, a child which one might have taken for a walk, holding its tiny hand; having a laugh with, looking at the Muppet show with;<br />but this god-send small human being has disappeared without a trace, and tracing it is of the essence. <br /><br />She lived among us , she disappeared, and she is entitled to us finding out what happened. <br /><br />Once committed, we ought to persevere, having come so far. <br /><br />So, dear Text: we'll have no more of this nonsense, and you'll continue alongside all of us, bringing down the murderers of Madeleine Beth McCann. <br /><br />See you in Lisboa around february 12th!<br /><br />PortiaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-88494702914680504722012-01-04T20:01:38.523+00:002012-01-04T20:01:38.523+00:00May I suggest that you leave this post while the L...May I suggest that you leave this post while the LI lasts? It’s due to resume soon and now the public will be watching and listening with sharper senses. The whitewash word is being used by all and I have yet to ONE person saying the inquiry is fair and impartial. I hope the clown gets the message he’s not funny.... not big or clever, time to beat a hasty retreat before the last shred of credibility he has is the latest joke.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-73830900766340459672012-01-04T16:51:35.547+00:002012-01-04T16:51:35.547+00:00Predictions do come true. Leveson can't say he...Predictions do come true. Leveson can't say he wasn't warned. Is this sheer arrogance or just a quest for a salary? Either choice he made to take the inquiry chair is wrong.<br /><br />http://beneaththewig.com/why-lord-justice-leveson-should-stand-downAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-22825182879231928882012-01-04T14:48:55.746+00:002012-01-04T14:48:55.746+00:00Guardian G2 The Revolution goes Viral
" Onc...Guardian G2 The Revolution goes Viral<br />" Once information networks become social, the implications are massive: truth can now travel faster than lies, and all propaganda becomes instantly flammable. Sure, you can try to insert spin, but the instantly networked consciousness of millions of people will set it right: they act like white blood cells against infection so that ultimately the truth, or something close to it, persists much longer than disinformation."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-72410127090183288672012-01-04T14:32:31.146+00:002012-01-04T14:32:31.146+00:00Anon 2:15
I think you're missing the point on...Anon 2:15<br /><br />I think you're missing the point on this post. Textusa is not stopping championing her, is she? If you're talking about other blogs, Pamalam has "suspended". Who else?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-57235549010000664742012-01-04T14:15:41.670+00:002012-01-04T14:15:41.670+00:00Poor Madeleine ,her champions are getting fewer an...Poor Madeleine ,her champions are getting fewer and fewerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-42350266102786564402012-01-04T13:47:30.529+00:002012-01-04T13:47:30.529+00:00Leveson unsavory connections with the Freud/Murdoc...Leveson unsavory connections with the Freud/Murdoch clan...the McCanns invited several times to meals at one of the Freuds holiday house in Luz ("the best risotto" Kate has ever had, so she boasted in her book!), it all STINKS!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-59160714247167234782012-01-04T13:23:02.692+00:002012-01-04T13:23:02.692+00:00'What took you so long', would sound right...'What took you so long', would sound right if all of this fuss wasn't but a catchy headline ...<br /><br />Many people have realised that this case has become a joke ever since the McCanns were allowed to go back to the UK and seized GA's book. Particulary in Portugal where people and have turn their backs to the story - as we say here - we've already donated to this collection.<br /><br />What we know for sure is that Madeleine will never be found alive. Case closed.<br />What will happen to the McCanns, I agree with you - probably nothing, in terms of judicial punishment. But I have a feeling they will get their tuppence worth from the twins, once they can think for themselves and get the story right...<br /><br />It can't hurt to keep campaigning for the truth, though. And we're all with you in that goal.<br />Have a good year.Formerly Known as 'Justice'noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-68434769421611736332012-01-04T12:11:33.033+00:002012-01-04T12:11:33.033+00:00So by asking these questions is Leveson admitting ...So by asking these questions is Leveson admitting he has no knowledge of something he is making accusations about? Making judhgenments without knowing what he's questioning? <br />The inquiry putting the cart before the horse? Hoping bloggers will feed him the information to implicate themselves? The questions read as though they were wrirten either when his mind was on something else or he got a 5 year old to think up some questions for him too use.<br />Who is this man Leveson and who chose him and why? Was he democratically elected? I'm guessing not!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-78211185005150249362012-01-04T12:04:40.694+00:002012-01-04T12:04:40.694+00:00Interesting set of questions that Leveson has put ...Interesting set of questions that Leveson has put to a blogger at http://order-order.com/2011/12/21/leveson-questions-guido/ :<br /> (1) Who you are and a brief summary of your career history;<br />(2) What material your website “Guido Fawkes” publishes, and Why;<br />(3) The Inquiry wishes to understand the extent to which your website is based in the UK. Where are your servers located? Do you consider the UK courts to have jurisdiction over the Way in which your website is operated in the UK, and how far does this jurisdiction extend?<br />(4) How you source stories (there is no need to name individuals) and Where you consider the responsibility for checking sources of information to lie, with you, or with the person who has provided you with the information;<br />(5) To what extent to which you are aware of the sources of the information which make up the central stories featured on your blog;<br />(6) The extent to which you consider that ethics can and should play a role in the blogosphere, and what you consider ‘ethics’ to mean in this context;<br />(7) Do you have any policy which relates to complaints about articles or web pages which are libellous, defamatory or considered to be an invasion of privacy? If not, do you have any relevant practices? Do you ever remove availability to such pages on that basis? The Inquiry would be grateful for some examples of this (anonymised if necessary). Copies of any policies should also be provided.<br />(8) How do you consider yourself to be regulated?<br />(9) The Inquiry would also welcome your views on the extent to which the content of Websites, and the manner in which you operate, can be regulated by a domestic system of regulation.<br />(10) Anything else which you consider will assist the Chairman to arrive at considered conclusions on any aspect of the Terms of Reference, set out above.<br /><br />Now, if only he had the same determination in getting answers with the journalists he “questions”…Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com