tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post503327204996361697..comments2023-10-30T07:28:35.018+00:00Comments on Textusa: Number 1 Is Always The FirstTextusahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comBlogger91125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-76231347123207047192012-09-25T16:50:33.805+01:002012-09-25T16:50:33.805+01:00"#1 is always the first house in any street. ..."#1 is always the first house in any street. Lote 1 is the first block apartment of Rua do Ramalhete." <br /><br />It is not true, lote 1 is near the other side of Ramalhete street in front of three tennis courts. I think it is due to the old numersation of the street: there are old houses there ...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-15795431332226646552012-06-24T19:39:04.169+01:002012-06-24T19:39:04.169+01:00Concerning the dna it is rather odd that the Mccan...Concerning the dna it is rather odd that the Mccanns did not pass to the police Cuddle cat as that would have had plenty of Maddie's dna on it being her special toy.<br />Then tellingly Kate deliberately washed it once cadaver was discovered on it.<br />Cuddle cat like everything else was 'a good marketing ploy'.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-48044260882180293442012-06-24T18:32:39.565+01:002012-06-24T18:32:39.565+01:00No surprise for me, they used pieces with a possib...No surprise for me, they used pieces with a possibility of weak DNA to show to the police. They are Doctors. They know very well the power and the infallibility of the DNA. Since their first approach with police, they played a trick game because the last thing they wanted, was the police finding Madeleine, when she was not yet in a safe place. They know, dogs are reliable and Portugal has a good reputation and a well trained team of dogs used in earthquake scenarios to locate people. Scared, if the police bring immediately to the crime scene, dogs. Like what happen. A Portuguese Camera man hired by Sky News, arrive very early on May 4 at the OC, and he reported the dogs searching everywhere. They gave to the police a bath towel as a source for Madeleine scent. Why not the clothes she wear that day ? A bath towel, in a resort, with 3 children having bath more or less at the same time, is a poor material to help the police locate a child. Unless, you don't want the child to be found. Which, I think, was the wish of who lived the last day of Madeleine.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-41374300671497783892012-06-24T11:42:16.669+01:002012-06-24T11:42:16.669+01:00Tex,
My comment was not referring to neglect it r...Tex,<br /><br />My comment was not referring to neglect it refers to the contempt shown by the parents towards their children.<br />I am fully aware there was no neglect as I have often mentioned in my previous posts. The neglect was another lie to introduce the abductor.<br />These children never stood a chance with such deceitful selfish parents.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-74669249666391442662012-06-24T10:20:41.744+01:002012-06-24T10:20:41.744+01:00Anon Jun 24, 2012 9:32:00 AM
It's unfortunate...Anon Jun 24, 2012 9:32:00 AM<br /><br />It's unfortunate that we get repeated references to neglect on a blog that maintains exactly the opposite position and that there are many other blogs to visit if you still believe neglect happened.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-52355796002355997882012-06-24T09:32:15.247+01:002012-06-24T09:32:15.247+01:00I was also shocked when I read that they had one t...I was also shocked when I read that they had one toothbruth for the three children. This says so much about the Mccanns and the treatment of their children Madeleine or the twins was an accident just waiting to happen with parents like that.<br /> Selfish parents that put their own pleasure before their children then lie about what happened, they are a disgrace.<br />Just like to say thanks to the brilliant poster that has countered the BH comments on here about dna - brilliant loved reading your comments you certainly know your biology and you helped me understand some things better as well so thanks x.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-64665680382031893772012-06-24T00:38:53.964+01:002012-06-24T00:38:53.964+01:00I say that it takes a lot of need to come here and...I say that it takes a lot of need to come here and disrupt after a post about disrupters has been published recently. Why the need? A raw nerve?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-72864696710745151262012-06-23T22:35:56.966+01:002012-06-23T22:35:56.966+01:00About Madeleine's DNA, I don't think it wa...About Madeleine's DNA, I don't think it was difficult to isolate it, among others.<br />3x children of the same parents. Father and mother the same, different other characteristics in the rest, one boy, two girls.The laboratorium had to separate the two girls.There must have been hair on her bed in Rothley and in 5a. If science managed to identifie the members of the family of the last Tsar, after so many years, identifying Maddie's DNA is much easier.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-56204368803591474222012-06-23T22:19:51.557+01:002012-06-23T22:19:51.557+01:00As far as I understood, there was only one toothbr...As far as I understood, there was only one toothbrush for the three todles.<br />At that time the McCanns did not have the fund yet,in order to help them to afford three brushes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-5173725331867759262012-06-23T19:25:22.658+01:002012-06-23T19:25:22.658+01:00Textusa, can you by chance remember an article tel...Textusa, can you by chance remember an article telling that Madeleine and Kate were regularly shouting at each other at the end of the afternoon, in 5a?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-19560889671629511642012-06-23T14:41:27.525+01:002012-06-23T14:41:27.525+01:00Goodness gracious me!!! My head is spinning with a...Goodness gracious me!!! My head is spinning with all the scientific information going back and forward in the comments! It's just too much for me ("muita areia para a minha camioneta"), but what really bothers me, the question that has benn on my mind for a long time regarding Madeleine's DNA is how it was obtained. WHERE AND WHAT FROM was her DNA sample taken??? If I'm not mistaken it was from a pillow, not from the apartment bvut from...Rothley!? Why from Rothley? Who can assure 100% that it was Madeleine's pillow? Her parents?! What I would very much like to know is why the sample was not obtained from the holiday apartment or any of the clothes she wore on the holiday, or her comb, hairbrush or tooth brush! Can anyone believe she did not have any of those items (which obviously would be of personel use, mainly the toothbrush) in Luz? One can accept the sharing of a comb or hairbrush, but a TOOTHBRUSH??? No way!<br />I, personnaly have deep reservations about what was analyzed as being "Madeleine's DNA", maybe we are here pulling our hairs out about something that never was...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-72396669742690648212012-06-23T14:36:30.301+01:002012-06-23T14:36:30.301+01:00The McCanns are living under a terrible pressure o...The McCanns are living under a terrible pressure of internet.Most of the blogs are against them. Bloggers have documentation about what happened, posters analyse them, they come up with ideas. Easy for the Scotland Yard to collect everything, specially the Freudian slips. They are living in a hell.And I also wonder if Kate regrets the offenses made to the PJ, "f...... tosser".<br />They never expected the Met to get involved in the case. They trusted Rebecca Brooks who betrayed them.<br />.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-73994212760695012932012-06-23T12:01:31.222+01:002012-06-23T12:01:31.222+01:00They know they are trapped not only by their lies ...They know they are trapped not only by their lies and the lies of the helpers they dragged in, but also by the forensic evidences. That's why they loose all cases that reach the courts in Portugal. Amaral book won against their wishes and will be like that in the future, unless Judges could be corrupted by the money from the Fund or a promise of any promotion on their careers. The money in the Fund is going to less and less.<br /> Murdoch, trough Rebecca Brooks, played a double roll, ensured his business while pretending to play the roll of a naif character who was easily foolish by the parents. The way he passed to their hands the money, tells us a lot. Which paper pass such amount of money without involving a court and doing everything to prevent waste that money? Only a clever rat, who knows they were trapped and under his hands, to be used and explored on the best interest of the papers. In fact, was an investment, a good business. When they have done that step, they must know that the business was a long term business with "big events planned". Was a good source of money, because during almost 2/ 3 years, everyday there was an article ( fabricated or not) to attract the public and sell the papers. The 500 thousands payed to each part, were quickly recovered.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-6522649806110001162012-06-23T11:23:26.974+01:002012-06-23T11:23:26.974+01:00Stuart Prior seemed baffled by the results so he m...Stuart Prior seemed baffled by the results so he must be one of the ignoramuses amongst us.<br />On 4/9/07 Leicester Police sent a FSS report citing 15/19 matches of Madeleine DNA profile in the car boot.<br />"With respect to the trace evidence behind the sofa all the confirmed DNA components coincide with the corresponding components in the DNA profile of Madeleine McCann."<br />Portimao 11 September 2007<br />Inspector Joao Carlos<br /><br />No wonder us less scientific souls are confused.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-46484054632341371002012-06-23T09:41:17.171+01:002012-06-23T09:41:17.171+01:00just few small questions to the BH who posts here:...just few small questions to the BH who posts here: <br /> Why Paulo Rebelo don't change the lign of the investigation? He had the same reports, the same results, the same material.<br /> Why he did not dismiss the reports and clearly pointed the investigation in to another direction?<br /><br /> Don't tell me de bla, bla, bla of the case been shelved and the arguido status lift.<br /> The case was shelved only because the Portuguese Prosecutor realized that they were wasting time and the public taxes in a case where the British authorities were not cooperating with their part of the investigation- steps that need to be done in UK were not done, using rubbish excuses. Lifting the arguidos status was just a normal consequence of the first reason. Not a passport of innocence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-62257619548304325392012-06-23T08:29:34.727+01:002012-06-23T08:29:34.727+01:00Good morning Text and Husband, Sisters.
Beware o...Good morning Text and Husband, Sisters.<br /><br /> Beware of the heat that will get it for our age it just makes us be careful. Also watch out ultraviolet radiation. We do not have to risk age. And I respect that care for me.<br />*************************<br /> Good morning everyone.<br /><br />The DNA evidence from what I see here, some comments from non-specialists, is a top concern. They know well that even the DNA and what is around it is a cause for fear. If not, nor answered.<br /><br />People concerned with DNA (not about the comments for the expert in biology, biologist) be careful because fear also brings problems of balance in physical and mental health.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15248067846422149470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-16227090987685512342012-06-23T08:00:43.893+01:002012-06-23T08:00:43.893+01:00to dear annon 12.26 fantastic posts you certainly ...to dear annon 12.26 fantastic posts you certainly know what you are talking about and you have definitely upset the BH with your knowledge.<br /><br />I am enjoying reading your responses well done.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-4831347175448636922012-06-23T07:24:31.187+01:002012-06-23T07:24:31.187+01:00Censored comment, this time from our biologist rea...Censored comment, this time from our biologist reader. Reason the use of the same expression against the BH that he used against you.<br /><br />"Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Number 1 Is Always The First": <br /><br />To my dear BH friend.<br /><br />If I want to be nasty, I could say that STR on that issue could also stand for DNA structure. But non, I go direct to the subject and to avoid calling me a liar,I will say that STRs are 'Short Tandem Repeats' which means short repeated sequences of DNA (the DNA profiling). I copy and paste this information from a link available to anyone, where you can go and learn something. That is an important piece of information that could clarify the point and help anybody to understand what was checked in Madeleine case. Was the DNA profiling, because that is the procedure in all crimes:<br />'STRs have become popular DNA markers because they are easily amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) without the problem of differential amplification; that is, the PCR products for STRs are generally similar in amount, making analysis easier. An individual inherits one copy of an STR from each parent, which may or may not have similar repeat sizes. The number of repeats in STR markers can be highly variable among individuals, which make these STRs effective for human identification purposes.<br /><br />For human identification purposes, it is important to have DNA markers that exhibit the highest possible variation in order to discriminate between samples. It is often challenging to obtain PCR amplification products from forensic samples because either the DNA in those samples is degraded, or mixed, such as in a sexual assault case.'<br /><br />Source:http://www.forensicdnacenter.com/dna-str.html <br /><br /><br />(censored) She got half STRs from each parents which could have similar repeat sizes or not. <br />The number of repeats is STRs has high variation between individuals, even belonging to the same family.<br />Was not me, was the forensic specialist who said that among the all shared markers found on the sample, 15/19 alleles match perfectly Madeleine DNA ( The DNA profiling, because there is no reason to search any other DNA). The specialist didn't say this 19 alleles from Madeleine were also found on Gerry or Kate DNA matching perfectly. And he had perfect samples of uncontaminated DNA( references) from Gerry and Kate to be compared. If that alleles were there under the same repetition, he will say 'exactly like one of her parents'. Instead, he went on with a rethoric to entertain the portuguese police. A music, the portuguese don't buy and some of the UK media didn't buy it as well, because where I heard first about the evidences found in the Scenic to be compromised to the Mccann's, was at Sky News with Martin Brunt. They were talking about this 15 alleles in the Scenic. <br /><br />With last post of dear BH, he/she shows that is somebody from inside the case. Trapped by the STRs. She/he knows that what was checked were the STRs and is not happy with what is being discussed. <br />Sorry, the business did not work well to your side today.<br />Mr. Redwood will have a hard time with PJ, if he goes there using your arguments to dismiss the details available on the reports. I can tell you, if the case become reopenned in Portugal involving a court, the Mccann's will have a hard time with the judges to give good excuses for Madeleine STRs in the boot of the Scenic.<br />Explained why they runaway from any repoen in Portugal or UK. Some important evidences are there to be seen, and the others, very quicly PJ reach them, if UK allow them to do a proper and independent investigation, passing all information requested.<br />Amazing your strategy to discover if I'm a she or a he. What is the importance of my gender? Did it make any difference in my brain or my skills? Stop being sexist. Is one more point against you, very'demode'. <br /><br />Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at Jun 23, 2012 12:26:00 AM"Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-76200001050783292762012-06-23T00:52:15.905+01:002012-06-23T00:52:15.905+01:00I don't believe that the PJ sent all of the sa...I don't believe that the PJ sent all of the samples to England. I believe they kept a lot with themselves because Portuguese laboratories are also good.Besides it became clear, from day one, that it was a politic/diplomatic case. Portugal would not take the risk to send everything to a British laboratory.We are not stupid, are we?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-8534849335874841892012-06-23T00:26:45.154+01:002012-06-23T00:26:45.154+01:00To my dear BH friend.
If I want to be nasty, I co...To my dear BH friend.<br /><br />If I want to be nasty, I could say that STR on that issue could also stand for DNA structure. But non, I go direct to the subject and to avoid calling me a liar,I will say that STRs are 'Short Tandem Repeats' which means short repeated sequences of DNA (the DNA profiling). I copy and paste this information from a link available to anyone, where you can go and learn something. That is an important piece of information that could clarify the point and help anybody to understand what was checked in Madeleine case. Was the DNA profiling, because that is the procedure in all crimes:<br />'STRs have become popular DNA markers because they are easily amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) without the problem of differential amplification; that is, the PCR products for STRs are generally similar in amount, making analysis easier. An individual inherits one copy of an STR from each parent, which may or may not have similar repeat sizes. The number of repeats in STR markers can be highly variable among individuals, which make these STRs effective for human identification purposes.<br /><br />For human identification purposes, it is important to have DNA markers that exhibit the highest possible variation in order to discriminate between samples. It is often challenging to obtain PCR amplification products from forensic samples because either the DNA in those samples is degraded, or mixed, such as in a sexual assault case.'<br /><br /> Source:http://www.forensicdnacenter.com/dna-str.html <br /> <br /><br />understand now? She got half STRs from each parents which could have similar repeat sizes or not. <br /> The number of repeats is STRs has high variation between individuals, even belonging to the same family.<br /> Was not me, was the forensic specialist who said that among the all shared markers found on the sample, 15/19 alleles match perfectly Madeleine DNA ( The DNA profiling, because there is no reason to search any other DNA). The specialist didn't say this 19 alleles from Madeleine were also found on Gerry or Kate DNA matching perfectly. And he had perfect samples of uncontaminated DNA( references) from Gerry and Kate to be compared. If that alleles were there under the same repetition, he will say 'exactly like one of her parents'. Instead, he went on with a rethoric to entertain the portuguese police. A music, the portuguese don't buy and some of the UK media didn't buy it as well, because where I heard first about the evidences found in the Scenic to be compromised to the Mccann's, was at Sky News with Martin Brunt. They were talking about this 15 alleles in the Scenic. <br /> <br /> With last post of dear BH, he/she shows that is somebody from inside the case. Trapped by the STRs. She/he knows that what was checked were the STRs and is not happy with what is being discussed. <br /> Sorry, the business did not work well to your side today.<br /> Mr. Redwood will have a hard time with PJ, if he goes there using your arguments to dismiss the details available on the reports. I can tell you, if the case become reopenned in Portugal involving a court, the Mccann's will have a hard time with the judges to give good excuses for Madeleine STRs in the boot of the Scenic.<br /> Explained why they runaway from any repoen in Portugal or UK. Some important evidences are there to be seen, and the others, very quicly PJ reach them, if UK allow them to do a proper and independent investigation, passing all information requested.<br /> Amazing your strategy to discover if I'm a she or a he. What is the importance of my gender? Did it make any difference in my brain or my skills? Stop being sexist. Is one more point against you, very'demode'.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-63137249418714978812012-06-22T22:19:33.845+01:002012-06-22T22:19:33.845+01:00Censored comment:
“Anonymous has left a new comme...Censored comment:<br /><br />“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Number 1 Is Always The First": <br />Ha ! You (censored). You know I'm right, that's quite clear from the bits you are chosing to omit from my posts.<br /><br />You might want to tell her she is making such a fool of herself. I actually feel sorry for her. Tell her she doesn't understand the difference between profile and sequence, really, it's painful to watch. Great fun though <br /><br />Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at Jun 22, 2012 10:05:00 PM”<br /><br /><br />To our biologist reader, I've been posting the last comments because among the aggressive and abusive language this BH places some questions to you.<br /><br />Since he's not able to use reason or reasonable language, I'll no longer be publishing his comments.<br /><br />To all our readers I apologise for this unpleasantness, but you may be happy to know that we've gone back to being a laughing stock somewhere out there, more precisely in fictionland.<br /><br />It's fascinating the amount of time they "waste" on what they deem to be a "nonsensical" blog...Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-29528636846685953282012-06-22T21:50:26.061+01:002012-06-22T21:50:26.061+01:00Censored comment:
“Anonymous has left a new comme...Censored comment:<br /><br />“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Number 1 Is Always The First": <br /><br />(censored)<br /><br />Ask her what STRs are? (censored)<br /><br />Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at Jun 22, 2012 9:38:00 PM”Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-44289972670791521812012-06-22T21:49:31.029+01:002012-06-22T21:49:31.029+01:00Censored comment:
“Anonymous has left a new comme...Censored comment:<br /><br />“Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Number 1 Is Always The First": <br /><br />(censored)<br /><br />This is the best bit.<br /><br />''. On Madeleine DNA( used as a reference), they found 19. if they found 19, means they found a piece of DNA which has a sequence of 19 genes that appear on that combination only on her DNA.''<br /><br />So completely wrong. (censored)<br /><br />(censored)<br /><br />Posted by Anonymous to Textusa at Jun 22, 2012 9:35:00 PM”Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-6683361978966843792012-06-22T21:45:26.638+01:002012-06-22T21:45:26.638+01:00A very measured response to refute 'MR angry&#...A very measured response to refute 'MR angry's'version of the DNA results. His attack was very desperate and came down to personal insults so obviously his nerves had been touched. <br /><br />It gave me a far better understanding of DNA when read alongside the PJ Files. Thank you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-34572476452109662302012-06-22T20:51:23.884+01:002012-06-22T20:51:23.884+01:00Cont:
Back to the DNA, I can't stop laughing ...Cont:<br /> Back to the DNA, I can't stop laughing with that exercise of numbers and letters. To achieve what? You don't even understand what you are trying to prove with your exercise. The best part was that one: "If I gave you a big pot which contained all the DNA markers from mum and dad, what would you be able to assemble? Child A or child B". Wrong: <br /> - first to have a child, you don't use all DNA markers from the parents. You use only half of each parent, since the sexual cells have half of the chromosomes, then half of the markers which accurately need to be called genes.<br /> - second, if you have in a pot all genes from both parents to produce a child, you don't get only child A and child B. In theory, you get millions, since each girl has on her ovaries millions of eggs ( no matter if only 1 or 2 mature in each menstrual cycle) and the man's have even more spermatozoids. Due to the limitation of the body nature, only one egg is normally released each month and ready to meet a spermatozoid, but the probabilities in theory are enormous. On your exercise the combination could also be child C or D, or E, or a child that never born. <br /> - When there is a crime and DNA is analyzed, there is a special test applied to the samples to determine the "DNA profiling" of the victim or the perpetrator, or both. it is called also DNA fingerprint because while using that technic what the investigator is trying to find is the sequence of markers ( genes) that are subjected to variation even in people belonging to the same family. On Madeleine DNA( used as a reference), they found 19. if they found 19, means they found a piece of DNA which has a sequence of 19 genes that appear on that combination only on her DNA. They had samples of the DNA of her parents, as references to be compared. In any part of the report, the scientist says that this 19 markers are also in the DNA profiling of her parents.<br /> She shared most of her markers with her parents and with the rest of the population in less possibilities. Amazingly, we share almost 99% of our DNA with everybody. But there is 1% that is different and that is enough to make each one of us unique. The DNA profiling searched when there is a crime is looking for that 1%. Why that DNA was found on the boot of the Scenic is what PJ wants to understand. <br /> Why discussing that here is disturbing so much somebody? Is a good point.<br /> Don't speak about markers like if they were a complicate subject, their accurate name is genes and the best image for genes is a collored bead and the way they combine, a beaded collar with different collors. Our DNA is a lottery that happen when the egg and the spermatozoid meet and the life began. Madeleine has on her collar a small part with 19 beads that appear combined in a particular way.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com