tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post4739461387390141323..comments2023-10-30T07:28:35.018+00:00Comments on Textusa: Planting a spyTextusahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comBlogger57125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-92842276445383592018-12-12T14:14:41.252+00:002018-12-12T14:14:41.252+00:00That doesn't half look like a flat bed van par...That doesn't half look like a flat bed van parked near Mr Murats property in the aerial shots in this post. Just a coincidental observation :) Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-18267337726464873422015-02-18T22:47:05.771+00:002015-02-18T22:47:05.771+00:00Hi Textusa I am currently working my way through a...Hi Textusa I am currently working my way through all your posts which I find enthralling! In fact I'm being naughty and reading at work. I have just been through the post with regard to the booking sheets for the supposed Tapas and just wondered if these could be simply booking sheets for staff at the OC to pass the bookings on to the Mill/Chaplins ie OC package holidays? With them being copied I just thought that the names on the sheets were the ones who had booked for the week and the add-ons were those who hadn't booked a package holiday?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-85578438782383498282015-02-18T21:39:51.961+00:002015-02-18T21:39:51.961+00:00https://mobile.twitter.com/Lord_Sugar/status/51906...https://mobile.twitter.com/Lord_Sugar/status/519065318720024577?p=vhttps://mobile.twitter.com/Lord_Sugar/status/519065318720024577?p=v<br /><br />Lord Sugar@Lord_Sugar Brenda Leyland:If she took her own life by pressure from media.There maybe a legal case against the media for incitement to commit suicide<br /><br />Well done, Lord Sugar!!<br />http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_SugarAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-7458549004876244742015-02-18T10:53:10.820+00:002015-02-18T10:53:10.820+00:00Hi textusa,I have just read from the jillhavernfor...Hi textusa,I have just read from the jillhavernforum that,"Leicestershire Police Force have wrote to Sky" on behalf of the coroner as part of the coroners inquest?<br />Wasn't this the same Police Force who told people if they had information on the disappearance of Madeline to contact certain person;s with it instead of the Police?<br />You can be sure of one thing,Leicester Police Force will have informed Sky that the Coroner will have to apply to a Judge to divulge to them "provide their source of information to Martin Brunt",protection for certain "Fat Ankles"could this source of information be one of Gerry's relatives,PM? <br />Who is protecting who?<br />Police advising Sky of their legal rights of revelation of their source of information! Or of how to protect their source and non disclosure of identity of the person, after all you can trust Leicestershire Police Force, FSS results to a Mr. Prior and PJ in the Madeline McCann missing person/ child case? <br />Why did the Police Advise the FSS to destroy the DNA after they had finished "Analysing this DNA"? <br />Surely this must be a first that the Police Force Advise/ Or ordered this in an unsolved case?<br />Can the Times be trusted, owned by Rupert who has paid out nearly £500,000 in damages to the parents of Madeline McCann.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-57174664330521448762015-02-18T10:20:30.037+00:002015-02-18T10:20:30.037+00:00The full article:
McCann tweets journalist told t...The full article:<br /><br />McCann tweets journalist told to reveal source<br /><br />Fiona Hamilton Crime Correspondent<br />Published 17 February 2015<br /><br />A coroner has demanded that a Sky News reporter divulge his source for a story about a woman who was found dead after the broadcaster revealed that she had “trolled” the parents of Madeleine McCann.<br /><br />The demand has raised fresh concerns about the state encroaching on journalists’ rights to keep their sources confidential, in the wake of revelations that police forces looked into their phone records on hundreds of occasions.<br /><br />Martin Brunt, Sky’s crime correspondent, is due to give evidence next month at the inquest of Brenda Leyland, 63, whose body was found in October.<br /><br />Mrs Leyland, of Burton Overy, Leicestershire, had been confronted days earlier as part of Mr Brunt’s exposé of a vitriolic online campaign against Kate and Gerry McCann. Their daughter, Madeleine, was three years old when she vanished from their holiday apartment in Portugal in 2007.<br /><br />Mrs Leyland, a divorced mother of two, was said to have used the Twitter handle @sweepyface to post thousands of tweets about the McCanns, describing them as the “worst of humankind”.<br /><br />Leicestershire police wrote to Sky on behalf of the coroner, Catherine Mason, asking a series of questions including the identity of the person who was behind the dossier of tweets. Sky has said that it will protect its source, arguing that its rights are protected under European law. It is understood that neither the police nor the coroner have responded since.<br /><br />Mr Brunt and Jonathan Levy, director of news gathering and operations at Sky News, are expected to be called to give evidence as witnesses on March 20.<br /><br />Coroners were given extra powers to question witnesses in new rules issued 18 months ago.<br /><br />Gavin Millar, QC, a prominent media lawyer, said: “I don’t think coroners really understand the limits of their powers in terms of trying to force journalists to reveal their sources. It’s a specialist area of law and they are not media lawyers.<br /><br />“As the investigations of coroners become more forensic and more determined, and they are given extra powers to require information from witnesses, they are going to have to start confronting these issues and acquire some learning about the rights of journalists.<br /><br />Bob Satchwell, executive director of the Society of Editors, said that it was “always worrying” when a journalist was asked to reveal their source as they should “obviously” remain confidential. He said that there had been a drive by the authorities in recent years to know journalistic sources, which had previously been “sacrosanct”.<br /><br />He added: “Its almost like they think the media is a fair game, and that’s a highly dangerous position.”<br /><br />The demand comes after the government promised to change legislation so that police must gain a judge’s agreement before they can snoop on journalists. It took action after it emerged that phone or email data was accessed to uncover confidential sources on 600 occasions.<br /><br />Police admitted using the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act to obtain email and phone communications between 82 journalists and 242 sources across 34 investigations in the past three years.<br /><br />Sky News and Leicestershire police declined to comment.<br /><br /><br />http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/medi ... 357525.ece (I pinched it from JAT)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-69333397220088740052015-02-18T08:23:20.173+00:002015-02-18T08:23:20.173+00:00Is it beginning to stir on the Western Front ? ......Is it beginning to stir on the Western Front ? ...Brunty and the times Slowly but surely our suspects who fled pdl are revealing their workings 'behind the scenes' and what is it with NSY who are just not making any 'progress' What is it now, DCI Hall, waiting for better days ? Almost 8 weeks into 2015 and no visible action ! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-61580955447172598392015-02-18T06:58:53.147+00:002015-02-18T06:58:53.147+00:00If Brunt reveals his source, his career as a journ...If Brunt reveals his source, his career as a journalist is ruined. Are we looking at Brunt doing time?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-46996331075849720012015-02-17T23:52:55.187+00:002015-02-17T23:52:55.187+00:00DO NOT PUBLISH reader at 17 Feb 2015, 21:44:00,
W...DO NOT PUBLISH reader at 17 Feb 2015, 21:44:00,<br /><br />We hope to answer your questions soon. Simplicty is the key.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-3236482399717089362015-02-17T23:52:00.701+00:002015-02-17T23:52:00.701+00:00Loz and Anonymous 17 Feb 2015, 23:45:00,
The Time...Loz and Anonymous 17 Feb 2015, 23:45:00,<br /><br />The Times? How interesting.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-15428412550261564792015-02-17T23:45:43.853+00:002015-02-17T23:45:43.853+00:00http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/medianews/artic...http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/medianews/article4357525.ece<br /><br />McCann tweets journalist told to reveal source <br /><br />Fiona Hamilton Crime Correspondent<br />Published at 10:01PM, February 17 2015<br /><br /> A coroner has demanded that a Sky News reporter divulge his source for a story about a woman who was found dead after the broadcaster revealed that she had “trolled” the parents of Madeleine McCann.<br /><br />The demand has raised fresh concerns about the state encroaching on journalists’ rights to keep their sources confidential, in the wake of revelations that police forces looked into their phone records on hundreds of occasions. <br /><br />Martin Brunt, Sky’s crime correspondent, is due to give evidence next month at the inquest of Brenda Leyland, 63, whose body was found in October. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-35342137738635716022015-02-17T23:43:03.444+00:002015-02-17T23:43:03.444+00:00Im feeling quite buoyed by this from The times med...Im feeling quite buoyed by this from The times media online today.... A coroner has demanded that a Sky News reporter divulge his source for a story about a woman who was found dead after the broadcaster revealed that she had “trolled” the parents of Madeleine McCann.loznoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-37695214372463471972015-02-17T21:43:29.135+00:002015-02-17T21:43:29.135+00:00Thanks for the reply.
I know what NB looks like b...Thanks for the reply.<br /><br />I know what NB looks like but I don't know what SC <br />looks like.<br /><br />Good stuff though from yoursel and Nuala.<br /><br />Who was leading who and why?<br /><br />The thing tha's always puzzled me vis - RM and his mother is why they <br />never heard anything on the night ,being as 5a is about 75 metres away from Casa Liliana?<br /><br />Keep upthe good work.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-51295819814999764562015-02-17T12:11:16.203+00:002015-02-17T12:11:16.203+00:00It looks like the cat has got the tongue of the bl...It looks like the cat has got the tongue of the blogger who created the anti-textusa blog. No reaction to the last 3 postsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-68874079881417567152015-02-17T11:48:05.835+00:002015-02-17T11:48:05.835+00:00Yes - you can read through these statements passiv...Yes - you can read through these statements passively and say OK or you can actually 'read' the statements and gain lots of wonderful insight and information. Textusa has thankfully made lots of us more aware of how to read & understand properly..also thanks to Nuala's contributions! It is now becoming apparent who is part of the charade Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-53847416851281413012015-02-17T10:49:17.883+00:002015-02-17T10:49:17.883+00:00Textusa,
Many thanks indeed for the Post Scriptum...Textusa,<br /><br />Many thanks indeed for the Post Scriptum reference and the subsequent investigating of.<br /><br />The sentence can most definitely be explained as such; heading back the path he had already been - so appreciate you investigating and pointing out the translation as a key point here. However, as you say, a sentence to note. :)<br /><br />The real undercurrent to highlighting these is in my enjoyment calling out the ambiguity, the loose language and rubbish phraseology, and as a result the poor quality of all and every 'witness' statement within the circle of trust. Like any lie - no detail versus sudden, tremendous detail - it is skill make it elastic. That's why sometimes, little things come out in the smallest of ways, lost, or revealed, in translation.<br /><br /><br />Nuala - great posts, thank you. A great example of how Textusa has made clear - it's all there for everyone to read for themselves! <br /><br />GP.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-14929348313520582552015-02-17T03:56:26.355+00:002015-02-17T03:56:26.355+00:00Textusa have you any assessment yet of the reactio...Textusa have you any assessment yet of the reaction of the BHs to these latest blogs. I get the impression that you havent really got started on your offensive and yet your evidence is already quite damming Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-40679495749672079172015-02-17T01:49:57.033+00:002015-02-17T01:49:57.033+00:00My thoughts also GP. For a holiday maker he seems...My thoughts also GP. For a holiday maker he seems very familiar with his fellow guests and their arrangements. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09417140193735527433noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-33136923077861865492015-02-16T21:14:02.841+00:002015-02-16T21:14:02.841+00:00Seems JW and SC were both going round in circles a...Seems JW and SC were both going round in circles and down dead-ends on the 3rd and 4th.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-12095435043700384162015-02-16T20:11:34.904+00:002015-02-16T20:11:34.904+00:00Thank you Textusa, but sadly work gets in the way ...Thank you Textusa, but sadly work gets in the way during the week and unfortunately I don't have so much time to ponder these things, so I'm afraid I'm going to let you down for Tuesday ;-)<br /><br />Thanks also for the info re the garages and the Portugese/English translation. So it's Mr Torchman then :)<br /><br />Your post scriptum prompted me to take a look at Kate's book to see what she had to say about events though I don't know how helpful it is because she's not exactly reliable, but this is what she had to say about the morning of 4th May:<br /><br />"At about nine o'clock we all went out on to Rua Dr Agostinho da Silva to find out what was going on and to look out for the PJ."<br /><br />Then she talks a bit about tracker dogs etc etc then:<br /><br />"Several people I recognised as other Mark Warner guests were milling around and a few of the men offered to help. Steve Carpenter told us that he had approached John Hill, the resort manager, insisting that all the apartments, occupied or not . . . should be opened <br />up and searched."<br /><br />Then a lady tells her about a car going up the Rocha Nigra, then Yvonne Martin arrives. (Note: YM's statement says "At around 09H00, she met the McCann couple next to the apartment from where the child had disappeared, accompanied by a third person, a male, who seemed quite familiar to her.")<br /><br />Kate continues:<br /><br />"Steve Carpenter returned with a man who had offered his assistance. He was, he'd told Steve, bilingual in English and Portugese and could maybe assist with interpreting."<br /><br />This was, of course, Robert Murat. <br /><br />So if you go by Kate's version SC was outside Apt 5A about 9am, he talked to Kate and whoever was with her and told them he'd spoken to John Hill. SC then goes off and returns with RM.<br /><br />Nuala xAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-76846751928975258572015-02-16T10:33:21.958+00:002015-02-16T10:33:21.958+00:00We inform readers that we have just added a Post-S...We inform readers that we have just added a Post-Scriptum to the post.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-59433922251083015522015-02-16T10:27:08.168+00:002015-02-16T10:27:08.168+00:00They haven't had to keep it up for 8 years.......They haven't had to keep it up for 8 years........they mad statements early in the investigation and were to the best of my knowledge not questioned since. If SY have questioned them we are not aware if they have continued to cover up or some of them have decided to come clean Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-88208076303499363672015-02-16T00:34:17.027+00:002015-02-16T00:34:17.027+00:00What I can't get my head round is that it seem...What I can't get my head round is that it seems to me almost all the guests/employees there that week were/are in on it or got convinced to tell a story.<br /><br />I just can't think what/who would compel them to do such a thing and then (seemingly) keep it up for 8 years.<br /><br />Can I just thank you TextUSA for these highly detailed blog posts of yours. Love reading them!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-5156074595390024102015-02-15T23:30:56.562+00:002015-02-15T23:30:56.562+00:00Nuala,
It’s Sunday. At this rhythm and enthusiasm...Nuala,<br /><br />It’s Sunday. At this rhythm and enthusiasm on your part (which we cannot put into words our appreciation and gratitude) we predict that by Tuesday you will have written the follow-up post completely!<br /><br />Your reasoning in ALL your posts is spot on!<br /><br />One minor (or major) correction. You, like us have been misled by an incorrect translation.<br /><br />Carpenter says, in Portuguese “E explicaram-lhe que tinham avistado um homem com tochas e sentiram algo de suspeito acerca dele, que não estavam nada satisfeitos com ele”<br /><br />This translates into "And explained to him that they had seen a man with torches and felt something suspicious about him, that they were not at all satisfied with him”.<br /><br />A man who Carpenter afterwards describes as being “na casa dos cinquenta e de cabelo cinza” or “in his fifties with grey hair”. Not blond or in his thirties.<br /><br />The question resides in the meaning of the word “tochas”. The literal translation would be burning torch.<br /><br />The document in the files is a translation from English into Portuguese. We don’t have access to the original transcript, so we don’t know what word DC Ferguson said which ended up being translated as “tochas”.<br /><br />We’re supposing that the original word would be torch (singular), or torches (plural), which would translate into a Portuguese “lanterna” (singular) or “lanternas” (plural).<br /><br />The word “tochas” related with hair means chunks. As in chunks of hair falling off, which remind one of flames of a burning torch. <br /><br />It’s only mentioned related with hair in cases of serious diseases, which we don’t think was the spirit of the sentence.<br /><br />So our assessment at this point in time (which is subject to correction) – in the post we have referred that Carpenter speaking of a man with dreadlocks, which we will now correct to a man with grey hair – is that he speaks of a man with a torch, or torches, who NB and RB had met and found suspicious. Nothing to do with dreadlocks.<br /><br />We thought important to make the correction as soon the mistake was detected, which, we repeat, we also made.<br /><br />About the garages, we have found some collective ones. We would signal 2:<br /><br />One in Rua da Escola Primária, which we have shown in our post “Public Misleading of Public, by McCanns” which seems to be a colective garage.<br />http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2010/07/public-misleading-of-public-by-mccanns.html<br /><br />The other, near block 5, in the building that is NOT part of the Ocean Club, at the crossing of Rua Dr Agostinho da Silva with Rua do Ramalhete. Doesn’t seem to be the "laundryman garage" described by Carpenter.<br /><br />We have only found 3 individual garages. It was on Beco da Alegria, just as one turns right coming from Rua da Escola Primária.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-10296423085552673132015-02-15T22:06:16.191+00:002015-02-15T22:06:16.191+00:00Anonymous 15 Feb 2015, 20:58:00,
Yes, laundryman ...Anonymous 15 Feb 2015, 20:58:00,<br /><br />Yes, laundryman who Carpenter speaks about is Marreiros. Why we say so, we will explain in a follow-up post.<br /><br />No, the man who Marreiros saw was not Carpenter but Neil Berry.<br /><br />PJ is very clear that it is Neil Berry.<br /><br />As we said in our post "Two men and a baby (cot)", PJ considers it a FACT in one of the questions to Berry; “considering the fact that you were seen by a witness, clarify what you were doing at that time next to the stairs leading to the upper floor, which are located next to the lift of Block 5 at the Ocean Club, i.e. not far from the apartment from where Madeleine McCann went missing?”<br />http://textusa.blogspot.pt/2015/01/two-men-and-baby-cot.html<br /><br />Neil Berry and not Carpenter.Textusahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06160632687242190030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6891574965172458848.post-89532173921452468612015-02-15T20:58:45.573+00:002015-02-15T20:58:45.573+00:00Textusa or Nula
Is this laundryman Mario Marreios...Textusa or Nula<br /><br />Is this laundryman Mario Marreios? ( or Mario Fernando as the Mirror calls him).<br /><br />The laundryman who says he saw a " very fat faced " man emerge from the shadows in the foyer near the stairs of the 5a block?<br /><br />My question is: does SC have a very fat face?<br /><br />SC says he never saw this mystery laundryman but if he (SC ) is the one who was near the stairs talked about in the previous blog he will know what the laundryman looks like.<br /><br />The question is - does Mario know what SC looks like?<br /><br />Or is he not the " very fat faced man " afterall ?"<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com